Handgun Gauss was recognized as a "serious weapon"

85
Screenshot from ArcFlash Labs' GR-1 Anvil Portable Gauss Rifle video (Forgotten Weapons YouTube channel)

The past year 2021 gave the gun world not so much News. Therefore, information from a relatively small American company Arcflash Labs, which experimented with unusual samples weaponshas interested many. Unexpectedly for the townsfolk, the Gauss rifle from the TV screens and monitors took a step into the real world.

True, the price of the novelty turned out to be large even for the American market. The weapon, which many still view as a very expensive toy, albeit one that is proven to be effective, went on sale for $3. With pre-order, you could buy the model with a 750% discount, but even $ 10 is an impressive amount for a country where the Colt M3 sport shooting carbine can be purchased from the manufacturer at a price of $ 375.



Perhaps it was to stimulate sales of not the cheapest model in the oversaturated US civilian weapons market that Arcflash Labs released a detailed review of its new product. For solidity, the company invited an American expert and the host of the popular firearms blog Forgotten Weapons, Ian McCollum.

This expert is known in our country. Russian state publications, for example, Rossiyskaya Gazeta, published some expert reviews when it came to samples of Soviet or Russian weapons, and the weapon reviews themselves were made in a complimentary way for us.

Arcflash Labs monetizes science fiction


Electromagnetic weapons were glorified by the scientist Carl Gauss and science fiction, which in the XNUMXth century stepped from the world of fiction to cinema screens, and then to computer monitors. Movies and computer games have expanded the audience of science fiction writers to the maximum. For example, the Gauss rifle featured in the world-famous Fallout video game series, being one of the most lethal weapons available to the player.

Model EMG-01B, which Arcflash Labs began selling in 2018, photo: arcflashlabs.com

Sooner or later, someone had to try to monetize this popularity. At the same time, Arcflash Labs did not go the easy way. The company could have limited itself to selling ordinary models and toys, made, as is now customary, on industrial 3D printers. But the Arcflash Labs engineers decided to make real weapons, albeit of limited use.

Any Gauss gun or Gauss cannon (Gauss gun, Gauss cannon), as in the case of Arcflash Labs, is a kind of electromagnetic mass accelerator. As you might guess, the weapon got its name in honor of the German scientist Carl Friedrich Gauss, who in the XNUMXth century left a noticeable mark in various fields of scientific knowledge: mechanics, mathematics, physics, geometry. Among other things, it was Gauss who laid the foundations for the entire mathematical theory of electromagnetism.

In 2018, Arcflash Labs introduced a commercial model of the EMG-01A electromagnetic rifle, which everyone could purchase. The model with a 6S LiPo battery and an 18-round magazine, which is actually small metal bars of a certain length and diameter, was the first commercial Gauss rifle model on the market.

This model EMG-01A was as close as possible to toys. In terms of power, the device was comparable to traditional air rifles, but the price for the EMG-01A was already sci-fi. Sales then started at $ 950, now the stock price of the model is $ 1.

Gauss rifle GR-1 ANVIL, photo: arcflashlabs.com

The GR-1 ANVIL (“Anvil”) Gauss hand rifle, which Arcflash Labs launched pre-sales in the second half of 2021, has become a more serious development. In promo videos, the company positioned the GR-1 ANVIL as the world's first serial Gauss rifle. At the same time, the declared muzzle energy was 100 J, which was comparable to models of pistols made for the small-caliber cartridge .22 LR (5,6x15,6 mm) common in the world.

What did the GR-1 ANVIL rifle show in the end?


As you already understood, the price of the GR-1 ANVIL Gauss rifle does not look like a toy at all. This is confirmed by testing the model. At the same time, outwardly, the Anvil still most of all resembles a toy from a store. This is largely due to the unusual appearance and a large number of components printed on a 3D printer. Despite the resemblance to a battery-powered plastic craft, the GR-1 ANVIL model is definitely not a toy anymore.

At the same time, the term “rifle” is also inaccurate in relation to this model of weapon, although this is purely a matter of taste. It is clear that there are no rifling in the barrel of the weapon, and technically we have before us something resembling a smoothbore gun, but in practice the phrase “Gauss rifle” itself has long become common in the world.

Gauss rifle GR-1 ANVIL, photo: arcflashlabs.com

The rifle stock, battery holders, magazines are 3D printed, some elements of the weapon are made of acrylic plastic (plexiglas). The model is equipped with a small LCD screen, which displays important information: battery charge, capacitor charge, coil temperature and other information that is diagnostic in nature.

The GR-1 ANVIL rifle uses a chain of coils that create a magnetic field, which gives acceleration to ferromagnetic ammunition more than one centimeter in diameter. The weapon accelerates these iron-rich metal bars to a speed of 75 m/s. The supply of ammunition is carried out from a magazine designed for 10 such cartridges.

The developer company notes that three main types of ammunition can be used with the GR-1 rifle: 32, 42 and 52 mm. Depending on the use of ammunition, the size of the magazine also changes. Ammunition diameter is stated as 0,5 inches (12,7 mm). To facilitate aiming from weapons weighing more than 9 kg, the model was equipped with a laser designator.

Gauss rifle GR-1 ANVIL, photo: arcflashlabs.com

Arcflash Labs says the GR-1 ANVIL is the most powerful electromagnetic rifle available on the market. They also highlight an advanced or advanced capacitor charging system that allows the 25V lithium ion battery pack to charge the coils fairly quickly. It takes three seconds to reload to shoot at full power. If the speed of the ammunition is not of fundamental importance to you, then the weapon can shoot faster.

The distinguishing feature of the weapon is its noiselessness, this model is no louder than a crossbow. Also, the GR-1 ANVIL has an important feature - the weapon creates a fairly strong magnetic field around itself. For this reason, it is strictly forbidden to use it within a radius of 15 meters from people who have pacemakers or similar devices installed that directly affect human life and health.

The power of the GR-1 ANVIL can't be compared to traditional firearms, but this model pierces plywood targets with confidence. There is also a moment in the video when a metal ammunition fired damages the wooden stand that held the target. Actually, this alone shows that the GR-1 ANVIL ceases to be a toy weapon. The model is much more powerful than air rifles and is able to deal real damage.

Frame from ArcFlash Labs' GR-1 Anvil Portable Gauss Rifle video (Forgotten Weapons youtube channel)

Of course, if we consider this electromagnetic weapon in terms of the amount of muzzle energy, then it will be small in comparison with traditional firearms. But what is now is potentially deadly, it all depends on the "success" of your shot. Ian McCollum notes that the GR-1 ANVIL should be treated with respect, like real models of firearms.

But even with this approach, the GR-1 can still cause criticism, both for its appearance and the general impression of experimental development and the feeling of a prototype of a future weapon. Ian McCollum also noted the random misfires that occur, which may be due to the low quality of fitting parts with the implemented 3D printing technology.
85 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    19 February 2022 04: 57
    The power of the GR-1 ANVIL can't be compared to traditional firearms, but this model pierces plywood targets with confidence.
    Make a trauma for our market and you will be happy. And our lawyers are in trouble. Not a firearm! feel
    1. KCA
      +10
      19 February 2022 05: 50
      And what is the headache? Firearms or not weapons are not the most important thing, there is a restriction on muzzle energy, for example, on pneumatics, there’s no firearms for anything, but there is a ban, I won’t tell you the exact numbers, crossbows and bows, well, I’ve never firearms either, but you need to get permission
      1. +2
        19 February 2022 17: 02
        Quote: KCA
        I won't give exact numbers.

        7,5 j and cal. up to 4,5 mm.
      2. Two
        0
        April 6 2022 14: 48
        For which group or type, you order ... Throwing, firearms, crushing ...
    2. +2
      19 February 2022 19: 11
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      Make a trauma for our market and you will be happy.

      With such a weight and dimensions, it is easier to beat on the head with such an injury! laughing
      1. 0
        19 March 2022 21: 12
        Don’t tell me if you pull such a elda out of your pants, then the potential target can crap. In extreme cases, as Boris-Razor said, it can be thrown at the enemy
  2. Cat
    +16
    19 February 2022 05: 50
    But even with this approach, the GR-1 can still cause criticism, both for its appearance and the general impression of experimental development and the feeling of a prototype of a future weapon.

    It always happens that way. The first airplanes also once seemed like a rattling misunderstanding - and how it happened! I think that there will also be something similar with these magnetic arrows, although personally I think that development will go towards caseless or, in principle, cartridgeless weapons and "liquid powders". This is more promising both in terms of specific energy consumption and logistics.
    1. -5
      19 February 2022 06: 17
      Quote: Gato
      This is more promising both in terms of specific energy consumption and logistics.

      If scientists could know all the prospects... You mentioned airplanes. It is true that:
      Quote: Gato
      how it happened!

      Only it did not go far until the jet engine appeared. I assume that caseless or cartridgeless has a right to exist. How much more PRACTICAL it will be than usual - time will tell. It may turn out that things will not go further than fundamentally new models for special forces.
      1. Cat
        +14
        19 February 2022 06: 22
        It just didn’t get far until the jet engine appeared

        Come on. Compare some Blerio XI and Tu-95 - not far lol - and this is for half a century. Strelkovka has not changed so fundamentally since WWI.
        1. +1
          19 February 2022 06: 49
          Quote: Gato
          It just didn’t get far until the jet engine appeared

          Come on. Compare some Blerio XI and Tu-95 - not far lol - and this is for half a century. Strelkovka has not changed so fundamentally since WWI.

          Not only from the WWI since the middle of the 19th century has not gone far.
          1. Cat
            +8
            19 February 2022 07: 27
            has not gone far since the middle of the 19th century.

            Well, yes, although probably from the middle of the XX - with the advent of mass personal automatic weapons. And with the advent of an assault rifle / machine gun for an intermediate cartridge - in general, in principle, nothing new. Maybe only large-caliber sniper rifles, but even then - there were some elephant fights at the beginning of the last century (as there: "first the shooter falls, then the rifle, then the elephant" laughing )
            1. +2
              19 February 2022 09: 21
              Quote: Gato
              Well, yes, although probably from the middle of the XX

              Well, new gunpowder began to appear there, and here too - as soon as sane super compact energy sources appear, progress will immediately take a step ..
              1. +1
                19 February 2022 09: 48
                Quote: mat-vey
                Well, so new gunpowder began to appear there, and here - as sane super compact energy sources appear, progress will immediately take a step

                This rifle has a limitation on "muzzle energy" and not on the power source. And this limitation is connected with electrical engineering - the capacitance of capacitors, the inductance of coils, the voltage on the capacitors (the time the capacitor is discharged through the next coil). High-current keys... Well, not a cheap solution... And you need to increase the energy ten times (100 J is 22 LR) and learn how to twist the bullet to stabilize it.
                Or use some kind of aerodynamic stabilization methods.
                1. 0
                  19 February 2022 09: 53
                  Quote: Mountain Shooter
                  And the energy must be raised ten times (100 J is 22 LR)

                  And how to raise it without a source of this very energy? So that the weapon itself could be raised ...
                  1. 0
                    19 February 2022 10: 10
                    Quote: mat-vey
                    And how to raise it without a source of this very energy? So that the weapon itself could be raised ...

                    How much energy is in the battery, for example, 20 Ah at 25 V? 1 800 000 J!!!
                    Even with an efficiency of 1%, this is a large reserve. With such an efficiency and a shot power of 1000 J, it will be enough for a couple of dozen shots. Although with such an efficiency of the coil and all the electronics it will be terribly warm ... Therefore, it is not the battery that limits this rifle. And the acceleration system, which requires you to turn off the coils in time, when the ammunition passes the center along the length of the coil. Otherwise, it will start to slow down the bullet. Therefore, there are many coils, so the circuit is complex. Railguns work more efficiently, but not at all like that. And the electrically conductive guides wear out a lot.
                    1. +1
                      19 February 2022 10: 18
                      Well, this confirms even more that no one “slows down” anything - it’s just not because it can’t be yet ... It’s banal that you can’t do it before solving objective problems ..
                      1. 0
                        19 February 2022 10: 22
                        Quote: mat-vey
                        Well, this confirms even more that no one “slows down” anything - it’s just not, because it can’t be yet ... It’s banal that you can’t do it before solving objective problems

                        It is possible that with the advent of high-temperature superconductors with operating temperatures of 200 C and above, such weapons will become both relevant and very compact. wassat
            2. -1
              19 February 2022 13: 12
              Quote: Gato
              first the shooter falls, then the rifle, then the elephant"

              So even now there are enough such elephant fights, according to the American video laughing laughing laughing
  3. +3
    19 February 2022 06: 04
    Handgun Gauss was recognized as a "serious weapon"

    Loud statement. Probably, those "eternal" nuclear batteries that were invented in Russia are littered with counters of all stores? Not? Then why the hell to disassemble what is prestigious here?
    Two fighters hold an exemplary duel. One with a Gauss rifle, the other with small arms of choice ... I don’t think that there will be many who want to resist the same AK-12.
    As for the seriousness of the Gauss rifle, then the price is undoubtedly serious in it.
    ***
    But what promising fantasies ... fellow
    1. +3
      19 February 2022 06: 16
      Everything starts somewhere. Progress is clear and very fast. And the noiselessness and cheapness of the shot, without the consumption of resources - gunpowder and shells, open up a wide road for this weapon in the future.
      1. +2
        19 February 2022 06: 21
        Quote: Snail N9
        And the noiselessness and cheapness of the shot

        I understand you. Only I always remember about:
      2. -1
        19 February 2022 06: 51
        Quote: Snail N9
        Everything starts somewhere. Progress is clear and very fast. And the noiselessness and cheapness of the shot, without the consumption of resources - gunpowder and shells, open up a wide road for this weapon in the future.

        From this point of view, the crossbow is also a promising and progressive weapon. laughing laughing
  4. +5
    19 February 2022 06: 30
    Yes, at first it will be like small things, but the evolution of batteries does not stand still. The first electric bicycles also traveled 20 km. And now even 200 can. By the way, such a fart will shoot perfectly on the Moon or Mars and you don’t have to bother with specials. There is nothing to burn here with cartridges.
    1. -2
      19 February 2022 06: 54
      Quote: Klingon
      Yes, at first it will be like small things, but the evolution of batteries does not stand still. The first electric bicycles also traveled 20 km. And now even 200 can. By the way, such a fart will shoot perfectly on the Moon or Mars and you don’t have to bother with specials. There is nothing to burn here with cartridges.

      Yes ... but where can you put the influence of the electromagnetic field? Already, everyone with pacemakers is advised to stay away, with an increase in power and, accordingly, the field, the heart will be able to stand up in a healthy person
      1. +8
        19 February 2022 07: 58
        How interesting will it look? In combat, should I ask the opponent about this? Hey dude, you don't have a pacemaker by any chance. And now I'm going to kill you.
        1. -2
          19 February 2022 13: 17
          Quote: Free Wind
          How interesting will it look? In combat, should I ask the opponent about this? Hey dude, you don't have a pacemaker by any chance. And now I'm going to kill you.

          No, they mean that if you have heart problems, then it’s better to stay away from such a gun. But this is low-power, and if you increase the power, then the negative impact of the magnetic field will hit a healthy person.
      2. 0
        19 February 2022 08: 47
        Quote: Alexey Sedykin
        Yes ... but where can you put the influence of the electromagnetic field?

        And the detection of such an arrow in the electromagnetic field is generally the simplest task. And the device for this is cheaper and simpler than a thermal imager or a night light, because it is not required to translate into the range visible to a person.
    2. +4
      19 February 2022 07: 54
      Gunpowder does not need oxygen to burn.
    3. +4
      19 February 2022 09: 58
      By the way, such a fart would be great to shoot on the Moon or Mars

      What, a gunshot can't? Gunpowder in the sleeve burns without air access ...

      ...It seems you have confused warm with soft. For shooting at weightlessness a recoil compensation mechanism is needed - for this they once muddied with Gyrojets. And to shoot - there will be a gunshot.
      1. -1
        19 February 2022 11: 00
        I wrote about the moon and Mars, what does weightlessness have to do with it?
    4. +3
      19 February 2022 11: 08
      Quote: Klingon
      By the way, such a fart will shoot great on the Moon or Mars and you don’t have to bother with specials. There is nothing to burn here with cartridges.
      On the moon, an ordinary gun can also shoot: the oxidizing agent is in the gunpowder itself.
    5. +3
      19 February 2022 14: 30
      I remember the first Gatling guns on cannon carriages. They also did not look progressive, but turned out to be the first weapon of mass destruction. So this "rifle" - looks like a toy-collective farm. Until you think that you can put it on the car, and at the same time recharge it. Especially if this car. - electric. Modularity is the simplest to implement: I added a "trunk", added batteries - that's the easel version. "Cartridges" can be manually made if necessary. I'm not talking about the fact that they are stored without problems and will not detonate - you can make a layer of armor reinforcement directly from the "cartridges" without increasing the mass of the vehicle.

      Finally, the rifle allows you to adjust (lower) the power of the shot immediately before this shot. While the rifle is a fart, there is nowhere to lower it, but with sufficient shot energy, the quality is useful. You can choose quieter and closer, a non-lethal shot, but you never know what else you may need! And without recoil, that is, it is possible to put three bullets at one point, if one is not enough.
  5. 0
    19 February 2022 06: 50
    Another confirmation that advertising is the engine of trade, and fashion is its driving force.
  6. 0
    19 February 2022 07: 15
    Gaussian efficiency is very low.
  7. +3
    19 February 2022 08: 18
    The morning on the collective farm began with "electricity"!

    60 mm ETH(ETS) gun...
    1. +6
      19 February 2022 10: 47
      Hello Nikolaich! smile
      Somehow, on a drunken case, I was brought to the city of Pripyat, as far as the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, so there the local people, besides the standard firearm, already used Gauss guns to the fullest, a lethal thing, I will tell you, they hit an elephant from a hundred meters on the spot. Yes, you don’t know, probably, elephants have already appeared there, with two heads. laughing

      1. +5
        19 February 2022 11: 44
        Hello, Kostya! I won’t say anything about Pripyat ... I don’t remember! But there was a time when Gauss sniper rifles were created by all schoolchildren, and who is not lazy!
        1.Ufimets Maxim Kotelnikov, a student of the 8th grade, assembled a working sample of a sniper rifle that works on the principle of a Gauss gun.
        The idea for this invention came to the boy's mind after he watched a television program about modern weapons that are used in Korea and the United States.
        It took the young Ufa man a year to create a rifle, and the idea was prompted by a friend’s broken toy - a children’s gun. Further, various improvised details were used. The weight of the rifle is 6 kilograms, and it shoots with special magnetized cartridges.
        “The weapon is promising, if only because it can shoot without recoil, without sound and without a flash from a shot. Currently, no sniper rifle can do this. I invented a system that I called "The Core System" and based on the principle of an accelerating coil. The system is powered by electricity. The bullet picks up speed instantly, ”said the inventor. (2010)

        2.Tambov sixth grader assembled a gauss gun and is thinking about a turbojet engine. (2019)
        3. A student from Armenia invented the Gauss gun with the highest efficiency (2018)
        If the "mind kids" are indulging in gausses with might and main, then for the "mutants" from Pripyat it's just spit and grind!
        1. +4
          19 February 2022 11: 56
          Enterprising kids, this is a real nightmare, I'm surprised that so far none of them have brought an atomic bomb to school. laughing
          1. +4
            19 February 2022 12: 05
            Quote: Sea Cat
            Enterprising kids, this is a real nightmare, I'm surprised that so far none of them have brought an atomic bomb to school.

            In the USA, a few years ago, one made an operating nuclear reactor ... In the garage. Rustle was...
            1. +3
              19 February 2022 12: 21
              There you go, that's exactly what I'm talking about. laughing


              Hi, Vyacheslav! hi
              1. +2
                19 February 2022 12: 31
                And all the best to you!
          2. +4
            19 February 2022 12: 34
            Spit! Spit! And then jinx it! belay
            1. +2
              19 February 2022 12: 38
              He spat, but to no avail, the director of the school just called - someone set fire to the local garbage dump. laughing
              1. +1
                19 February 2022 12: 42
                Quote: Sea Cat
                He spat, but to no avail, the director of the school just called - someone set fire to the local garbage dump.

                Well, garbage is still tolerable! It's good that it's not a nuclear power plant!
                1. +1
                  19 February 2022 13: 47
                  And who had fun in Chernobyl? laughing
  8. 0
    19 February 2022 08: 37
    The power of the GR-1 ANVIL cannot be compared with traditional models of firearms, but this model pierces plywood targets with confidence. There is also a moment in the video when a metal ammunition fired damages the wooden stand that held the target. Actually, this alone shows that the GR-1 ANVIL ceases to be a toy weapon.

    So far, this is a competitor to the slingshot, maybe with time ...
    1. +6
      19 February 2022 10: 20
      Quote: riwas
      So far, this is a competitor to the slingshot, maybe with time ...

      And why is it so dismissive about a slingshot? am
  9. 0
    19 February 2022 10: 57
    Quote: Alexey Sedykin
    Quote: Klingon
    Yes, at first it will be like small things, but the evolution of batteries does not stand still. The first electric bicycles also traveled 20 km. And now even 200 can. By the way, such a fart will shoot perfectly on the Moon or Mars and you don’t have to bother with specials. There is nothing to burn here with cartridges.

    Yes ... but where can you put the influence of the electromagnetic field? Already, everyone with pacemakers is advised to stay away, with an increase in power and, accordingly, the field, the heart will be able to stand up in a healthy person

    When you stand near the transformer box, does your heart stop? Or when you go through the scanner at the airport? Have you heard of such a thing as an MRI? Did someone die of cardiac arrest during an MRI scan? But there the magnetic field is a hundred times stronger wassat
    1. -4
      19 February 2022 13: 23
      Quote: Klingon
      Quote: Alexey Sedykin
      Quote: Klingon
      Yes, at first it will be like small things, but the evolution of batteries does not stand still. The first electric bicycles also traveled 20 km. And now even 200 can. By the way, such a fart will shoot perfectly on the Moon or Mars and you don’t have to bother with specials. There is nothing to burn here with cartridges.

      Yes ... but where can you put the influence of the electromagnetic field? Already, everyone with pacemakers is advised to stay away, with an increase in power and, accordingly, the field, the heart will be able to stand up in a healthy person

      When you stand near the transformer box, does your heart stop? Or when you go through the scanner at the airport? Have you heard of such a thing as an MRI? Did someone die of cardiac arrest during an MRI scan? But there the magnetic field is a hundred times stronger wassat

      Do you know that all this for those with a pacemaker is allowed to pass at your own peril and risk? In order to get something killer, you need to be much more powerful than the frame at the Airport, but about MRI it’s generally funny ... do you go through it every day, like you stand for hours at the transformer box?
      1. 0
        21 February 2022 02: 12
        There are already pacemakers who do not care about MRI and detector frames
        1. -2
          21 February 2022 08: 31
          Quote: FireLake
          There are already pacemakers who do not care about MRI and detector frames

          Is this how you decided to jump off the discussion? As I understand it, you have no intelligible proof of the harmlessness of such weapons.
          1. 0
            23 February 2022 16: 38
            Discuss what? Pacemakers or what?
            1. -1
              23 February 2022 17: 57
              Quote: FireLake
              Discuss what? Pacemakers or what?

              Obviously, no... request
              1. 0
                26 February 2022 12: 08
                An MRI study is absolutely harmless for the body. The field strength of 3T is now being done at 4T. So please take off your tinfoil hat.
  10. 0
    19 February 2022 11: 04
    The very low efficiency of this method of accelerating the projectile (I remember on some resource it was indicated that only 1.5% of the energy goes directly to the acceleration of the projectile, the rest goes into heat, magnetization) in general, it puts an end to the idea itself. Any such weapon will be very bulky - a battery, a capacitor bank, increased insulation, bulk electromagnets, the inevitable length of the accelerating barrel.
    What are the benefits of this product? Relative noiselessness is leveled by increased visibility in the IR spectrum (and increased detectability by EM radiation). The caseless and powderless nature of the cartridge is offset by low muzzle energy and the lack of automatic fire.
    Theoretically, this type of weapon can become attractive only if high-temperature superconductivity is discovered, which will make it possible to create more powerful and more compact magnets, and thus can radically increase muzzle energy.
    1. +2
      19 February 2022 11: 11
      I remember someone famous at the beginning of the last century said that airplanes are nonsense and the future belongs to balloons and balloons wink
    2. +3
      19 February 2022 14: 32
      Such a weapon is currently only at the very start of its evolutionary development, but the fact that it will eventually come into use in the army and civilians is a fact.
      1. 0
        19 February 2022 14: 56
        Well, the directly lethal qualities of "Gauss" can be increased (without further increasing the mass and dimensions) only through progress in superconductivity. Progress with the battery will give capacity and some increase in power (small), progress in the direction of capacitors is not expected, as far as I know (here we are talking about purely physical limitations). Perhaps some progress would be made if we switched to the best magnetic materials for bullets - but all this is a penny increase, in fact, because there is physics that quite severely limits the efficiency of such devices according to the principle of their operation. A radical increase in the efficiency of the principle is not expected, with the exception of superconducting magnets. Or follow the path of increasing linear dimensions and mass.
    3. Cat
      0
      19 February 2022 16: 03
      lack of automatic fire

      I think this is what negates any benefits
  11. +3
    19 February 2022 11: 40
    what can I say ... Some acceptable "kill" has already been achieved at a certain distance. Shop food, reload in three seconds, not the largest dimensions. Not bad. But the main thing - "almost noiselessness". And this factor "product number 62" certainly makes it interesting for some organizations. Incl. and "forbidden". Moreover, the development of the topic "Gauss" continues ...
    1. -3
      19 February 2022 13: 26
      Quote: Tarasios
      what can I say ... Some acceptable "kill" has already been achieved at a certain distance. Shop food, reload in three seconds, not the largest dimensions. Not bad. But the main thing - "almost noiselessness". And this factor "product number 62" certainly makes it interesting for some organizations. Incl. and "forbidden". Moreover, the development of the topic "Gauss" continues ...

      The crossbow is generally silent ... just a godsend for interesting organizations in your words
      1. +5
        19 February 2022 14: 35
        For crossbows, the speed is insufficient - but for Gaus it can be increased to several kilometers per second and more - the only question is for materials, energy-generating capacities and energy storage devices.
        1. -2
          19 February 2022 22: 09
          Quote: Vadim237
          For crossbows, the speed is insufficient - but for Gaus it can be increased to several kilometers per second and more - the only question is for materials, energy-generating capacities and energy storage devices.

          In theory, anything is possible, but in real life...
  12. +3
    19 February 2022 15: 55
    In the future, gauss guns will be an ideal tank gun, since the caliber cannot be increased indefinitely (152 mm, hardly any further), and there is also active protection. And such a gun will destroy any tank with any armor.
  13. 0
    19 February 2022 16: 37
    Yes, I’m afraid that it’s still a toy, and the energy of 100 J seems to me a little strained, I watched a lot of videos with this rifle. She, in general, is still far from rsr-pneumatics. PCP is now really replacing the melkans, I myself have one.
  14. -1
    19 February 2022 17: 27
    Useless dangerous for the shooter ... rather they will find some kind of hydrogen replacement for gunpowder.
  15. 0
    19 February 2022 19: 39
    Quote: Alexey Sedykin
    Quote: Free Wind
    How interesting will it look? In combat, should I ask the opponent about this? Hey dude, you don't have a pacemaker by any chance. And now I'm going to kill you.

    No, they mean that if you have heart problems, then it’s better to stay away from such a gun. But this is low-power, and if you increase the power, then the negative impact of the magnetic field will hit a healthy person.

    Do not write nonsense with a better study of the issue with magnetic fields. Physics grade 6
  16. +2
    19 February 2022 20: 18
    I wonder if there are any prospects for a gaus gun or a railgun in a monitor implementation!?!?
    T. E.
    Do not immediately try to create a hand weapon of a fighter. And design it as a support weapon installed on light and medium vehicles (cars, buggies, helicopters) or as a stationary one (like a machine gun for checkpoints or pillboxes). Then you can temporarily move away from the problems of ergonomics, nutrition and weight. And concentrate on the very mechanism of firing and supplying ammunition. And already from the operating experience to bring to the "manual" model.
    Like with a firearm. There have always been projects to increase the firepower of a fighter since the advent of a firearm as such. But it was the appearance of the Maxim machine gun and the study of the experience of its use that showed how these machine guns should grow to hand weapons.
    1. 0
      21 February 2022 20: 43
      I wonder if there are any prospects for a gaus gun or a railgun in a monitor implementation!
      Looking at what prospects to lay. In the sense of cutting the dough - this is generally a gold mine.
      1. 0
        21 February 2022 21: 17
        This perspective can be stuck anywhere. But we are considering scenarios where they work not for profit!
        1. 0
          22 February 2022 09: 54
          Zumvolt's example shows the promise of such scenarios. In the variant of the Gauss gun, it will be the same.
          1. 0
            22 February 2022 10: 54
            You did not understand. Any project can be sawn. But we are sitting here on a "military review" and not on a "corruption review". So let's think about technology and perspectives. Let others think about money.
            1. 0
              22 February 2022 11: 02
              But we are sitting here on a "military review" and not on a "corruption review". So let's think about technology and perspectives. Let others think about money.
              So I'm already telling you almost openly - there are no prospects there. The United States has enough pieces of paper for any cut and with a slide. But this did not help to make the railgun concept (based on Lorentz forces) a competitive model compared to powder artillery or rockets. With a Gauss gun (magnetic acceleration) it will be the same. According to cost/effectiveness criteria.
  17. -1
    19 February 2022 20: 33
    Even a weak crossbow has more killing power.
    1. +2
      19 February 2022 21: 17
      Today he has 100 J and tomorrow he will have 1000 J and after tomorrow 2000 and so on.
  18. 0
    19 February 2022 23: 16
    The distinguishing feature of the weapon is its noiselessness, this model is no louder than a crossbow.

    Well, at this speed, where does the sound come from? Vintorez also shoots almost silently. The shutter clicks louder. The main sound of the shot is the bullet crossing the sound barrier. So there will be speed, there will be a roar from this prodigy. Yes
  19. +1
    20 February 2022 00: 18
    even $3 is a hefty sum in a country where the Colt M375 sport rifle can be purchased from the manufacturer for as low as $4.

    The fact is that this particular product from the Colt company is, as it were, far from being a standard of cheapness. On the US arms market, there are quite acceptable quality self-loading carbines based on the AR15 / M16 design in the price range of $ 500-600 "per gun". For example, the same carbines from the manufacturer Palmetto State Armory.
    The weapon accelerates these iron-rich metal bars to a speed of 75 m/s

    Modern hunting crossbows easily accelerate an arrow (something tells me a noticeably larger mass than the shells of this Gaussian) to 90-95 and sometimes even more meters per second. With a mass noticeably less than 9 kilograms.
    The power of the GR-1 ANVIL can't be compared to traditional firearms, but this model pierces plywood targets with confidence. There is also a moment in the video when a metal ammunition fired damages the wooden stand that held the target. Actually, this alone shows that the GR-1 ANVIL ceases to be a toy weapon. The model is much more powerful than air rifles and is able to deal real damage.

    What kind of air rifles? The ones sold without a license and limited to 7,5 Joule muzzle energy?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Girardoni_air_rifle
    Girardoni air rifle. 152 m / s muzzle velocity, 159 Joules - muzzle energy. Invented at the end of the 18th century. And even despite this, its mass is only 4,5-4,6 kg. Against 9 kg for the "Gaussian" in question.

    Actually, the main obstacle on the way to turning gauss guns into a really serious weapon essentially remains the same - a sufficiently powerful, but moreover, compact, light and reliable source of energy for them has not yet been invented. Alas.
  20. 0
    20 February 2022 08: 53
    Progress does not stand still, the first firearm was also not recognized by anyone
  21. -1
    20 February 2022 12: 15
    A toy printed on a printer with Arduino electronics .. Why write about this at all on VO?
    1. +1
      21 February 2022 10: 59
      I made a potato gun with semi-automatic reloading, let's write about it. And what? Her muzzle energy is many times greater than that of this fart, and the caliber in general is 50mm))) It’s a pity that her name is not as euphonious as “Gauss rifle”, of course this can ruin everything))))
  22. -1
    20 February 2022 13: 27
    Toy. Too heavy, and lethality - like a scarecrow. Dead-end direction for hand weapons. If you increase the power to the desired values, it will become unsafe for the shooter himself. What happens to meat in the microwave? The same thing will happen to the flesh of someone who tries to fire a kilowatt-powered railgun. The eyes are definitely hurt. Yes, and how the electronic filling will survive the alternating electromagnetic field is also a question.
  23. 0
    20 February 2022 19: 18
    Down and Out trouble started! wink
  24. 0
    21 February 2022 02: 16
    Quote: Gato
    It always happens.

    Right.
    They will raise the muzzle energy, reduce the weight (earlier, with cell phones it was possible to fight off a crowd of hooligans in Biryulyovo at night), and you will never change Gauss for an "ancient" firearm)
  25. 0
    24 February 2022 09: 06
    Quote: Comrade Kim

    They will raise the muzzle energy, reduce the weight (earlier, with cell phones it was possible to fight off a crowd of hooligans in Biryulyovo at night), and you will never change Gauss for an "ancient" firearm)


    Bad cell phone analogy. Different devices and different purposes.
    Due to what it is possible to increase the muzzle energy, and even so significantly?
    The question of the safety of such weapons for the shooter himself is still unanswered.
    Even if the railgun is created, it can only be used as a sniper weapon, since the high reload speed (necessary for assault weapons) is simply unthinkable for it. And if you shoot from a sniper, your face (eyes) is very close to the weapon (the sight on it). The effect of microwave radiation on the eyes has been sufficiently studied (very detrimental).

    In short, when such a system can be brought to mind, making it efficient and safe, it will become morally obsolete. With compact and powerful energy sources, it will be possible to create laser-blasters-plasma guns that you will never exchange for an "ancient" gauss rifle.
  26. 0
    April 23 2022 22: 54
    Well done, develop and improve. I always thought that such a weapon is a fairy tale, but here it is what)