Russia deployed Tu-22M3 long-range bombers and MiG-31K interceptors with the Dagger complex to Khmeimim

91

The Ministry of Defense deployed Tu-22M3 long-range bombers and MiG-31K interceptors with Kinzhal hypersonic systems to Syria. According to the military department, the planes have already landed at the Khmeimim airbase.

The MiG-31K and Tu-22M3 relocated to Syria will take part in joint exercises with the Russian Navy grouping, which will be held in the eastern part of the Mediterranean Sea. The crews of the aircraft performed a flight from the points of deployment, covering more than 1,5 thousand kilometers. The report refers to two Tu-22M3 long-range bombers armed with supersonic anti-ship missiles.



It should be noted that the Khmeimim airbase already hosted both Tu-22M3 and MiG-31K last year, when long-range bombers were deployed to Syria for the first time. This was made possible by the reconstruction of the second runway with its lengthening, new coating and the installation of new lighting and radio equipment. Now the airbase can receive aircraft of all types, including heavy ones.

In addition to participating in joint exercises, aircraft crews will acquire practical skills in new geographical areas, in particular, over the Mediterranean Sea, and study a possible theater of operations. In addition, the MiG-31K and Tu-22M3 will take part in combat missions, including the defense of two Russian military bases in Syria - Tartus and Khmeimim.

And the Russian exercises will have many spectators, there are now three aircraft carrier groups in the Mediterranean Sea, one each from the USA, France and Italy. So there will be someone to follow the flights of Russian aircraft. It is likely that the MiG-31K and Tu-22M3 will work out the tasks of destroying the enemy aircraft carrier group, although completely different tasks will be named aloud.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    91 comment
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. 0
      15 February 2022 16: 21
      And I thought they could say hello to Turkey? Whatever once again thought to be naughty
      1. +24
        15 February 2022 16: 25
        Quote: APASUS
        And I thought they could say hello to Turkey? Whatever once again thought to be naughty

        In the Mediterranean Sea, the grouping of NATO ships is being pulled together. Apparently, a counterweight is being prepared for them.
        1. -10
          15 February 2022 17: 41
          Quote: A resident of the Urals
          Quote: APASUS
          And I thought they could say hello to Turkey? Whatever once again thought to be naughty

          In the Mediterranean Sea, the grouping of NATO ships is being pulled together. Apparently, a counterweight is being prepared for them.

          That is, everyone here is sure that there will be no Russian invasion. But, is everyone sure that the goals of the exercises are not bearded men, but ships and points located on the other side of the sea?
          1. +21
            15 February 2022 18: 06
            Quote: Vol4ara
            That is, everyone here is sure that there will be no Russian invasion. But, is everyone sure that the goals of the exercises are not bearded men, but ships and points located on the other side of the sea?

            =======
            And supersonic anti-ship missiles and "Daggers" - it will be too fat for a bearded one! They will have enough with their heads and something simpler and cheaper! bully
            1. 0
              16 February 2022 16: 50
              Quote: venik
              Enough and something simpler and cheaper!

              F-1 at the special forces
          2. 0
            15 February 2022 20: 53
            Many people need to see the dagger in work. We are waiting for the picture ..
            1. -1
              16 February 2022 16: 51
              Quote: 2306
              need to see.waiting for picture..

              Which one? In flight, or how does it explode?
      2. +3
        15 February 2022 16: 26
        The Turks do not have such ships to spend Daggers or x-22 on them
        1. -2
          15 February 2022 16: 39
          They have a lot of frigates. In short, a scoundrel, everything suits him .. More precisely, in the face, at least X22, at least with the "Dagger"
          1. +7
            15 February 2022 16: 53
            Well, there are Bastions there for these purposes, and it seems that there hasn’t been an aggravation with the Turks yet, but with the Americans it’s in full swing ..
        2. -4
          15 February 2022 16: 53
          Quote: Barberry25
          The Turks do not have such ships to spend Daggers or x-22 on them

          X-22 in modern conditions is not applicable only if X is 32.
          1. +3
            15 February 2022 17: 56
            Quote: 1976AG
            X-22 is not applicable in modern conditions

            Why?
            1. -5
              15 February 2022 18: 58
              Quote: Bez 310
              Quote: 1976AG
              X-22 is not applicable in modern conditions

              Why?

              Read what this rocket is and you will understand everything.
              1. +3
                15 February 2022 19: 02
                Quote: 1976AG
                Read what this rocket is

                Yes, I read it a long time ago...
                So what are you talking about? Why was this missile able to work on NK before, but now it cannot?
                1. +2
                  15 February 2022 19: 22
                  Quote: Bez 310
                  Quote: 1976AG
                  Read what this rocket is

                  Yes, I read it a long time ago...
                  So what are you talking about? Why was this missile able to work on NK before, but now it cannot?

                  Well, if very briefly - there is no noise immunity. Plus, a very hemorrhagic service, as it is equipped with a rocket engine with aggressive fuel components. It was decided to eliminate these shortcomings back in the days of the Soviet Union, it was then that the development of the X-32 to replace the X-22 began.
                  1. +2
                    15 February 2022 19: 31
                    Quote: 1976AG
                    equipped with LRE

                    Isn't the rocket engine on the X-32?
                    And what's the engine? Or is the fuel different?
                    Tell me, very interesting.
                    1. 0
                      15 February 2022 19: 43
                      The X-32 also has a rocket engine, but upgraded, most likely the fuel is different. A new noise-immune radar-inertial guidance system with radio command correction and reference to the terrain has been installed. Instead of an autopilot, an automatic control system was installed. Unfortunately, there is still no detailed information on the Kh-32, although it was officially put into service in 2016.
                      1. +2
                        15 February 2022 19: 46
                        Quote: 1976AG
                        Probably different fuel

                        That is, you do not know anything about this, and you simply quote the Internet? Clear...
                        On the Internet, I can rummage myself.
                        1. +2
                          15 February 2022 19: 48
                          So I just told you to read. Maybe you missed this moment?
                        2. +3
                          15 February 2022 19: 49
                          Quote: 1976AG
                          I told you to read

                          I read...
                          I read the flight manual, all sorts of instructions.
                        3. +1
                          15 February 2022 19: 50
                          Quote: Bez 310
                          Quote: 1976AG
                          I told you to read

                          I read...
                          I read the flight manual, all sorts of instructions.

                          Then maybe you can tell something about it?
                        4. +3
                          15 February 2022 19: 59
                          Quote: 1976AG
                          can you tell me something about her?

                          No.
                        5. 0
                          15 February 2022 20: 01
                          It's a pity. There is an information vacuum on it ((
                        6. +1
                          16 February 2022 05: 21
                          Offset drinks
                          I have the same clever younger cousin. Even arguing is not interesting. Knows everything from the word at all. only from the army mowed for 10 years with my grandparents.
          2. +2
            15 February 2022 18: 21
            quite applicable, a rocket is like a rocket, if it undergoes maintenance
            1. -2
              15 February 2022 19: 01
              Quote: Barberry25
              quite applicable, a rocket is like a rocket, if it undergoes maintenance

              Maintenance is non-existent here.
              1. +3
                15 February 2022 19: 33
                1) who said that there is no noise immunity? The fact that it is low does not mean that it does not exist,
                2) taking into account the fact that guidance occurs at a great distance and diving from 20 km at an angle of 30 degrees to the target at a speed of the order of Mach 4, jamming is not very helpful
                1. -2
                  15 February 2022 19: 46
                  Quote: Barberry25
                  1) who said that there is no noise immunity? The fact that it is low does not mean that it does not exist,
                  2) taking into account the fact that guidance occurs at a great distance and diving from 20 km at an angle of 30 degrees to the target at a speed of the order of Mach 4, jamming is not very helpful

                  Well, because it is so beautiful, work began on a new rocket back in the 80s of the last century.
                  1. +2
                    15 February 2022 20: 53
                    This is called modernization and development)
                    1. -5
                      15 February 2022 20: 56
                      This is called non-compliance with modern requirements) And it ceased to meet these requirements almost 40 years ago
        3. +1
          15 February 2022 17: 39
          I agree, rather X32 ...
      3. +1
        15 February 2022 16: 30
        Such planes can say hello to everyone ... if only they would give an order
        1. 0
          15 February 2022 16: 55
          I think there are at least 3 APCs in the CRM: Pike, Antey and Ash - straight fable
          wrote that diesel-electric submarine pr.677 St. Petersburg came
          it is still unknown how many of the 6 diesel-electric submarines pr.636 in the World Cup and SRM
          concrete subfloor assembled
          1. +2
            15 February 2022 20: 44
            And three groups (squadrons) of ships, one in the western Mediterranean, the second in the eastern. third in the Black Sea. At the head of each missile cruiser of project 1164 "Atlant". It is clear that each group of ships has a pair of submarines. And now sickly planes with deadly weapons .. This waltz group is not simple... belay Conducive to thinking about war and peace .. Better about peace ... with Russia.
      4. +2
        15 February 2022 20: 45
        It’s necessary to show the cartoons in action .. relevant. everything is according to the plan as BB says. and drive the barmaleev
      5. -2
        16 February 2022 16: 44
        Quote: APASUS
        And I thought they could say hello to Turkey?

        Is it okay that they have our S-400 complex? And not alone
    2. +10
      15 February 2022 16: 24
      By the way, is it now correct to call the MiG-31K an interceptor? Tactical missile carrier
      1. +2
        15 February 2022 16: 29
        The classification depends primarily on the purpose of the equipment, especially since MiG-31 interceptors continue to fly quite well. In this case, these are journalists, they are still professionals for the most part.
      2. +2
        15 February 2022 17: 18
        Quote: El Chuvachino
        Tactical missile carrier

        Strategic interceptor. Yes fellow
      3. +3
        15 February 2022 17: 43
        Quote: El Chuvachino
        By the way, is it now correct to call the MiG-31K an interceptor?
        31Kshki, of which there are very few, and 31Ishki, which are now being mastered, oddly enough they relate to the economy of “far-farers”, they also squeeze airfields from air defense workers wink
        1. +2
          15 February 2022 20: 32
          Quote: Pete Mitchell
          belong to the economy of "distant",

          However, which was to be proved. Yes
    3. 0
      15 February 2022 16: 28
      We need to have a firm agreement with the Persians so that their military airfields can be used by our Aerospace Forces for strikes against pro-Turkish militants and ISIS.
      1. 0
        15 February 2022 17: 48
        Quote: Thrifty
        We need to have a firm agreement with the Persians so that their military airfields can be used by our Aerospace Forces for strikes against pro-Turkish militants and ISIS.

        There was an agreement. And even used for an intermediate landing. But not everyone liked it there, they evicted and the contract ended.
    4. +2
      15 February 2022 16: 29
      MiG-31K and Tu-22M3 will work out the tasks of destroying the enemy aircraft carrier group

      There are now three carrier groups in the Mediterranean, one each from the United States, France and Italy.

      Which of the three is ready? Or all three at once? lol
      1. +2
        15 February 2022 16: 36
        Three poplars on Plyushchikha in front of a brigade of lumberjacks. winked situation, however.
      2. -6
        15 February 2022 16: 41
        No one ... A pair of Tu-22m3, and even more so a pair of MIG-31K, are not particularly terrible for AUGs. It is unlikely that they will even come close to them.
        1. +2
          15 February 2022 17: 40
          Quote: Wedmak
          It is unlikely that they will even come close to them.

          And the MiGs do not need to fly up to the range of the NATO air group.
          The Dagger has a range of 2000 km without a carrier combat radius, so the Mig 31K can shoot from the Black Sea right up to the Italian boot, without any problems for itself.
          1. 0
            15 February 2022 17: 51
            Quote: kventinasd
            Dagger has a range of 2000 km

            Ага.
            And target designation is also from the Black Sea?
            1. 0
              15 February 2022 18: 10
              Dagger has INS with Glonasov correction + optical seeker, AWACS is not needed there.
              1. -1
                15 February 2022 18: 47
                Quote: kventinasd
                ANN with Glonasov correction

                And will the GLONASS coordinates be invented by him, or should someone first find the enemy and transmit the coordinates further on command?
                As far as I remember, Kinzhal works with IL22, but they are not there.
                1. 0
                  15 February 2022 19: 32
                  Quote: Jacket in stock
                  As far as I remember, Kinzhal works with IL22, but they are not there.

                  Isn't a submarine suitable for determining coordinates?
              2. +5
                15 February 2022 20: 21
                Quote: kventinasd
                At Dagger INS with Glonasov correction + optical seeker

                where are the firewood like GOS from? Share a link?
                Quote: kventinasd
                there AWACS is not needed.

                How will you look for the target? How will you determine the coordinates of the target, how will you issue the control center? INS missiles must be programmed before launch (download a flight task)
              3. +2
                16 February 2022 21: 38
                Quote: kventinasd
                optical seeker

                Poke her lens finger, if you don't mind. lol
          2. +1
            15 February 2022 17: 57
            Quote: kventinasd
            The Dagger has a range of 2000 km without a carrier combat radius

            Нет!
        2. -2
          15 February 2022 18: 24
          1) why approach when the launch range of the x-22 is more than 500 km, the range of the Dagger is more than 1, if I'm not mistaken, up to 000 km.
          2) the use of long-range anti-ship missiles is complicated by only one thing - knowing the location of the target at the time of the missile launch, but there are no problems with this in the Mediterranean Sea, tea is not an ocean)
      3. +3
        15 February 2022 16: 59
        I strongly doubt that the paddling pools with pasta, in which case they will climb into this storm .. Is it for them - on feijoa ??
      4. 0
        15 February 2022 17: 07
        1 PC. Ameram (deserved)
        1 PC. French (know your place)
        And the Italians, according to the old tradition, drowned themselves. wassat
    5. +4
      15 February 2022 16: 32
      Yesterday. 2 B52s flew out of England according to plan, they were to demonstrate their determination to us in the Mediterranean Sea. After refueling, one of them had technical malfunctions and returned to England. The second passed through Egypt and Saudi Arabia. Interfax. And not "too much" forces, to drive three AUGs?
    6. +3
      15 February 2022 16: 39
      And the Russian exercises will have many spectators, there are now three aircraft carrier groups in the Mediterranean Sea, one each from the USA, France and Italy.


      Why viewers? They will make excellent training targets (I hope they will remain educational).
      It is a sin to miss such a moment for training, when you can practice on the whole "herd" at once.
    7. -6
      15 February 2022 16: 54
      I wonder how many missiles are in a salvo?
      On each Tu-22 3? Total about ten for the whole group?
      How much lower is the range of those launched from the Tu-22 than those launched from the MiG-31?
      1. KCA
        +2
        15 February 2022 17: 03
        TU-22M3 do not carry Daggers, their anti-ship missiles are Kh-32, range up to 1000 km, Daggers are planned to be suspended on TU-22M3M, but so far the first modernized one is only being tested
        1. +3
          15 February 2022 17: 17
          TU-22M3 do not carry Daggers, their anti-ship missiles are Kh-32

          I wonder what they have there so large under the "belly"?
          1. KCA
            +2
            15 February 2022 17: 32
            X-22 and X-32 length 11.65m, suspension options one under the belly, two under the wings or three both here and there, depending on the flight range, after all, the weight of each is under 6 tons
          2. +3
            15 February 2022 18: 00
            Quote: KCA
            Kh-32, range up to 1000 km

            In what variant is such a range?

            Quote: alexmach
            What is it they have there such a large under the "belly"?

            If you think that there is a "Dagger", then you are mistaken.
            1. +5
              15 February 2022 18: 30
              Mikhail, you know very well that IN NO OPTION it flies to 1000 (unfortunately, of course), although it should be noted that the launch range has increased compared to x22, and there are more launch modes. You can’t work out according to AUG, but according to KUG or according to DESO ..... At least all missile carriers will return home
              1. +1
                15 February 2022 18: 36
                Quote: Rushnairfors
                IN NO OPTION does it fly at 1000 (

                I guess about it, but what if the guys know something that we are not supposed to know?
                1. 0
                  17 February 2022 13: 12
                  but suddenly the guys know something that we are not supposed to know?
                  Even if they do know, we are not supposed to. So don't share. And it is right. Because... it's not allowed. hi
            2. KCA
              0
              16 February 2022 06: 30
              Unfortunately, I can’t give a link to official information, KTRV, for some reason, closed the website of the developer X-22 and X-32 of the Raduga GosMKB, where there was information on almost all their developments, and there is no nichrome on the KTRV website itself, but other sites indicate the range from 600 to 1000
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. +4
        15 February 2022 17: 31
        TU22m3 from the Khmeimim strip with 3 three missiles is unlikely to be able to take off. And strictly speaking, even two fully fueled missiles are already a reloading option. Something like this
        1. +6
          15 February 2022 17: 33
          According to the video, the tu22m3 has one x22 on the ventral bd, and at the mig31 I didn’t see anything at all, maybe the daggers were rammed on the il76 with a convoy?
      3. +2
        15 February 2022 20: 29
        Quote: Bogatyrev
        I wonder how many missiles are in a salvo?
        On each Tu-22 3?

        Tu-22M3 carry X-22 anti-ship missiles. They don't have daggers.
        From one to three (maximum) Kh-22s for each Tu-22M3 - one under the wings and one under the fuselage.

        1. 0
          16 February 2022 08: 40
          Just not x-22 .. but X-32 for a long time
          1. 0
            16 February 2022 08: 48
            Quote: Skipper
            Just not x-22 .. but X-32 for a long time

            How can you prove that it is X-32, and not X-22, on the pendants?
            How can you prove that the plane is a Tu-22M3M, and not a Tu-22M3? Because under the X-32 the missile carrier must be upgraded to the M3M version

            As far as is known, there is currently only one Tu-22M3M unit in the Russian Aerospace Forces

            I hope for a correct and reasoned answer hi
    8. +4
      15 February 2022 17: 12
      What would the NATO fleet crouch a little?!
      The British tabloid The Sun "learned" the exact time when Russian troops will invade Ukraine. They refer to "American intelligence" data.
      According to these data, the attack will begin at 03.00 Kyiv time (04.00 Moscow time) on February 16. 200 thousand soldiers will participate in the offensive.
      1. +3
        15 February 2022 17: 46
        Quote: GELEZNII_KAPUT
        According to these data, the attack will begin at 03.00 Kyiv time (04.00 Moscow time) on February 16. 200 thousand soldiers will participate in the offensive.

        Where do they get such nonsense from? Weedy weed these days?
    9. +7
      15 February 2022 17: 17
      About such curtsies towards "partners", on our part, a few years ago, we only talked ...
    10. +3
      15 February 2022 17: 43
      This is not a MiG-31K, but a MiG-31I. The name is no longer secret, Shoigu also voiced it, the plane is also with a dagger, the equipment is more advanced
    11. +1
      15 February 2022 17: 51
      The MiG-31K and Tu-22M3 relocated to Syria will take part in joint exercises with the Russian Navy grouping, which will be held in the eastern part of the Mediterranean Sea.
      . Everything is according to plan ... EXERCISES GOING ON.
    12. -1
      15 February 2022 18: 07
      Now aMerika will think whether to start something on the outskirts or not.
      And then, after all, support for the Outskirts from the Mediterranean, now may not sail ...
      (There are ways to meet them in the Black Sea).
    13. +1
      15 February 2022 19: 55
      They promised .... immediately Tu22M3M with a dagger
    14. +6
      15 February 2022 22: 56
      Allegedly, the troops were withdrawn from the borders .... AUG killers were driven to Middle-earth ... our castling for the Yankees did not improve their position ... it even worsened - the panheads did not become much calmer from the removal of a part of the l / s of our aircraft, but over the Yankees hung "strategists". Putin boldly and boldly operates even with minimal means, extracting the maximum to strengthen his position and image.
      1. +2
        16 February 2022 05: 11
        Quote: Fisherman
        our castling for the Yankees did not improve their position ... it even worsened - the panheads did not become much calmer from the withdrawal

        Let the owners with tobacco strain.
        1. +3
          16 February 2022 22: 03
          "That's right!" (comrade Sukhov)
    15. -1
      15 February 2022 23: 20
      Blocking of the gas pipeline Qatar - Turkey and without
      bombers are still working.
      The mercenaries were dispersed.

      When we stop defending
      interests of Gazprom, the gas pipeline will continue
      his march to the borders of Turkey.

      The agreement was signed in early 2000 between
      Qatar and Turkey.

      When there were simply no "flows" at all.
      And as far as I know, not cancelled.
      Compare gas reserves of Qatar and Russia
      it doesn't even make sense.

      My opinion.
    16. -1
      15 February 2022 23: 34
      All three Ukrainian boats are in trouble, they fly to destroy them ...
    17. 0
      16 February 2022 01: 15
      It is a mistake to call the MiG-31K an interceptor.
    18. -1
      16 February 2022 05: 17
      Yeah, and once again the United States will demand an explanation from Russia, like what the hell are your fighters doing there with the Dagger on board))
    19. -3
      16 February 2022 08: 37
      So they pulled up a sickly ship grouping and even all Atlantes .. once again ALL ATLANTS in the Mediterranean Sea together .. and Moscow and Admiral Ustinov and Varyag ..... it will be very interesting and fun ... we need more popcorn ....
    20. kig
      0
      16 February 2022 17: 37
      The MIG-31 with the Dagger is no longer quite an interceptor. Or rather, an interceptor, but not those.
    21. 0
      16 February 2022 18: 02
      it will not be enough !!!!! wink winked smile
    22. 0
      16 February 2022 19: 01
      YES, no, this is against terrorists !!!! - bastards are running everywhere, you’ll catch hell !!!! wink

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"