The American observer does not exclude the possible participation of the F-15 fighters transferred to Poland in the defense of Ukraine in the event of an “attack” by the Russian Federation

71

US Air Force F-15 fighter planes were sent to Poland from the UK as part of a mission to strengthen the defense capability of NATO's eastern flank. The main task of deploying aircraft at the Polish airbase Lask is to counter the so-called Russian military threat. Fighters are planned to be used in regular patrols of the Baltic airspace.

The American press does not rule out the possible participation of the F-15 fighters transferred to Poland in the defense of Ukraine in the event of a Russian "attack". Aircraft can take part in operations or divert the attention of the Russian military to themselves. Also, the deployment of F-15 aircraft in Poland is seen as a response to the military maneuvers of Russia and Belarus. This opinion is voiced by the American columnist Thomas Newdick.



F-15Cs and F-15Ds from the 48th Fighter Wing, usually based at RAF Lakenheath in England, were deployed to Poland. They will have to interact with the aircraft of the Polish Air Force and the Royal Danish Air Force. Danish and Polish fighters fly from a base in Siauliai, Lithuania, ensuring the security of the airspace of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. US F-15s are known to have arrived in Poland carrying AIM-120 medium-range air-to-air missiles (AMRAAM).

American Command aviation specifically mentioned the need to contain Russia in the region and emphasized the readiness of the aircraft to work with other US allies in NATO, which will consist in practicing air-to-air and air-to-ground operations. The planes will operate as part of the "air police" mission, which was launched in 2014 after the events in Crimea and involves US aviation supporting the air forces of friendly Eastern European countries. The commander of the US Air Force in Europe and Africa, General Jeff Harrigian, noted that the appearance of new aircraft will strengthen the collective defense on the eastern flank of the North Atlantic Alliance.

The American observer notes that Russia has increased its military presence on the border with Ukraine and has concentrated significant forces in Belarus for maneuvers. It is also noted that MiG-31 Russian Aerospace Forces are deployed in Kaliningrad, which the United States calls a response to the movement of NATO troops on the territory of several states of Eastern Europe.

While the F-15s were being transferred to Poland, four US Air Force B-52H strategic bombers from the 5th Bomber Wing stationed at Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota, arrived in the UK. Their appearance, as noted by the American press, will also increase the potential of NATO forces in Europe.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

71 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +15
    11 February 2022 10: 17
    Aircraft may take part in operations or divert the attention of the Russian military to themselves
    Particularly pleased with the second part of the proposal. Will they be substituted for Russian air defense systems or somehow distract from the Armed Forces of Ukraine? Participation of American aircraft in the Ukrainian conflict and against Russia? Sheer nonsense, unless the Americans are going to start a war with our country.
    1. +7
      11 February 2022 10: 27
      The American press does not rule out the possible participation of the F-15 fighters transferred to Poland in the defense of Ukraine in the event of a Russian "attack".
      What is there some kind of "command" or "committee of staffs" ... Here is the American press - YES !!! That's what the press says - that's how it will be wassat
      I would call this conclusion as "the American press is in endless delirium"
    2. +1
      11 February 2022 10: 32
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Sheer nonsense, unless the Americans are going to start a war with our country.

      That's it. Because everything starts small and then on the rise and so it is not possible to stop.
      1. +1
        11 February 2022 10: 52
        Quote: YOUR
        everything starts small and then on the rise and so it is not possible to stop

        On the one hand, yes, but on the other ... today only the article was:
        ...The cost of renting US Air Force fighters (hourly):
        F-35A $18
        F-22A $38
        F-15E Strike Eagle $17...

        And what will be paid? For future victories? Or on credit like the rest of the weapon. Another thing is that it is useless - we will land anyway, especially if they are "drawn", but fly anywhere. And there can’t be many of them, even these ... hegemons will go bankrupt
        1. 0
          11 February 2022 11: 01
          The one who always pays will pay. In this case, the American taxpayer.
          1. +1
            11 February 2022 11: 37
            Quote: YOUR
            The one who always pays will pay. In this case, the American taxpayer.

            Everyone who supports the circulation of dollars in the world and the public debt of the striped people pay.
            Including Russia. hi
    3. 0
      11 February 2022 11: 18
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Particularly pleased with the second part of the proposal. Will they be substituted for Russian air defense systems or somehow distract from the Armed Forces of Ukraine?

      Let them not climb under the Russian air defense. Or under fighter missiles. ... do not move bags. They all won in the media space. Because they monopolized the world media. We thought Orwell wrote his 1984 about us... Naive. He wrote about his own.
      1. -1
        11 February 2022 16: 25
        And tell me, at what distance will the S-400 / S-300 complex detect this same American fighter that will drop to a height of 1000-1500 meters?
        1. 0
          11 February 2022 17: 03
          Quote: Osipov9391
          And tell me, at what distance will the S-400 / S-300 complex detect this same American fighter that will drop to a height of 1000-1500 meters?

          At an altitude of 100 m - 41 km, at an altitude of 1000 meters about 100 km
          This is if he does not turn on his radar.
          1. -2
            11 February 2022 18: 48
            And why would an American turn on his radar when his work will be coordinated by AWACS?
            The detection range of 100 km of a fighter flying at an altitude of 1 km is nothing if they fly in the depths of the territory.
            Yes, and it takes him a minute to get out of the detection zone, no more. As the SPO squeaked, it simply dropped 100-200 m of the ceiling and disappeared from the radar.
            1. 0
              11 February 2022 18: 54
              Quote: Osipov9391
              And why would an American turn on his radar when his work will be coordinated by AWACS?

              Is he an all-seeing AWACS? And invincible? For him, just a long-range S-400 can reach out. If he approaches the border. And if you don't get close, you won't see anything. Its range is 400 km. By Wiki.
              1. -1
                11 February 2022 23: 46
                AWACS cannot have a range of 400 km. At least 550-600 km. and this is optimal. And it costs the crew nothing to leave the detection zone - they threw off 500-800 meters of the ceiling and you can’t be seen.
                True, the viewing radius will drop a little, but not critically.
    4. 0
      11 February 2022 11: 35
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Participation of American aircraft in the Ukrainian conflict and against Russia?

      Experts from the press have already calculated everything. Do the pilots know?
    5. -1
      11 February 2022 12: 42
      - "to distract?!" - not for long, but they are enough ...
      8-))
    6. +1
      11 February 2022 16: 51
      This is the appearance of help. Like, don't ssy, Greenery, come on! If anything, we will stand up for you! The same was true in Georgia. And when it smelled of fried, no one from the West helped the Georgians. I very much doubt that the F-15 shines on flat terrain. There is nowhere for them to hide from air defense, there are no mountains, everything is visible and translucent in this direction, and the Baltic states are small. Aircraft are visible immediately after takeoff.
  2. +2
    11 February 2022 10: 25
    The American observer does not exclude the possible participation of the F-15 fighters transferred to Poland in the defense of Ukraine in the event of an “attack” by the Russian Federation
    It seems very likely that many journalists and others who consider themselves media, ie. the fifth power, they believe that the tail twirls the dog and there will be NOTHING for that tail !!!
    For whom, old Joe said \ expressed fears that drawing their contingent into a small-town conflict, maybe, for everyone, would end SAD!!!
    Do they have brains at all?
    1. -1
      11 February 2022 10: 37
      Quote: rocket757
      The American observer does not exclude the possible participation of the F-15 fighters transferred to Poland in the defense of Ukraine in the event of an “attack” by the Russian Federation
      It seems very likely that many journalists and others who consider themselves media, ie. the fifth power, they believe that the tail twirls the dog and there will be NOTHING for that tail !!!
      For whom, old Joe said \ expressed fears that drawing their contingent into a small-town conflict, maybe, for everyone, would end SAD!!!
      Do they have brains at all?

      And what in reality can their media do? Nothing. And they really consider themselves a branch of power, since the tail wags the "dog", and the "dog" allows it.
      1. +2
        11 February 2022 10: 52
        The media can only work for babosiki ...
        Those. some have options, sponsorship, count kept women! or work in such a way that it would be interesting for the layman, and at the same time for advertisers.
        In general, one of the oldest ... in all its glory, and even imagined itself above all rules.
        1. +1
          11 February 2022 11: 31
          Quote: rocket757
          The media can only work for babosiki ...
          Those. some have options, sponsorship, count kept women! or work in such a way that it would be interesting for the layman, and at the same time for advertisers.
          In general, one of the oldest ... in all its glory, and even imagined itself above all rules.

          This is all clear. I do not mean it. Not in vain, the director of the SNN was removed, apparently he felt like a "tail" wagging a "dog". But it was they who removed it so that IMI would not wag. What can we do with such media? Here I am talking about this?
          1. 0
            11 February 2022 12: 28
            Quote: SKVichyakow
            Not in vain, the director of the SNN was removed,

            I can repeat what I heard ... CNN is catastrophically losing popularity ... accordingly, advertising is leaving them, and these are not small losses. Okay, with the losses of the Demo Party, its bosses would have put up with it, not the poor guys, after all ... but the rating has dropped below the baseboard (for such a large edition), readability is declining, and this is not in the arc for their bosses, especially now.
            Quote: SKVichyakow
            What can we do with such media? Here I am talking about this?

            And we have something that, everything is on schedule, everything is on the shelves ... Tina Kandelaki was appointed to TNT! The question is WHY?
            Although, in my opinion, TNT sucks ... however, like some other channels!
            Honestly, I practically don’t watch TV ... I’m very safe from them!
            Internet and radio, although somehow, at least something, you can find.
        2. +1
          11 February 2022 11: 39
          I can only add this reviewer, you can’t call him anything else, not the only one in the press, carries everything that just came to mind, without thinking about the meaning of his words. A complete waste of that.
          1. 0
            11 February 2022 12: 31
            Quote: Alexander 3
            Sheer waste.

            This is true, there is a waste of that and labor la la enough in abundance. They are artisans, on order, for specific grandmas and only for their audience ...
            if they hadn't been shoved here, we wouldn't have known about them at all.
            1. +1
              11 February 2022 13: 02
              If they also read our comments addressed to them, they would be very pleased with themselves. They would be proud of their reflection in the mirror.
              1. +1
                11 February 2022 13: 12
                The most unpleasant, and even tragic, for many, is when they are not noticed, they are not celebrated at all ...
                This is not such a place, one way or another, at least a little, but they will note.
          2. 0
            11 February 2022 17: 16
            Quote: Alexander 3
            I can only add this reviewer, you can’t call him anything else, not the only one in the press, carries everything that just came to mind, without thinking about the meaning of his words. A complete waste of that.

            It doesn’t carry from itself, because someone puts it in the ears.
            1. 0
              11 February 2022 17: 50
              The talking head must think what it is talking about.
              1. 0
                11 February 2022 18: 27
                Quote: Alexander 3
                The talking head must think what it is talking about.

                Sometimes conflicting "requests" may be received from different applicants and from different departments, it is impossible to disobey.
                1. 0
                  11 February 2022 18: 32
                  Lavrov is three heads taller than everyone else. He thinks what he says.
  3. +4
    11 February 2022 10: 26
    They can hang around there, but if they want to participate on the side of Ukraine, then this can already lead to a full-fledged war with all the ensuing consequences, and it’s far from a fact that according to their scenario.
    1. -2
      11 February 2022 10: 34
      There is a concept: "volunteers".
      Russian volunteers fought in Donbass.
      Russia does not deny this.
      Volunteers from Europe can fight in Ukraine.
      As if, under their own responsibility, without the participation of their
      States.
      Including the pilots.
      The plane is transferred "as a gift".
      The pilot came as a volunteer.
      1. -1
        11 February 2022 10: 40
        let the f35 be sent immediately to Ukraine as a "gift", what a trifle
      2. 0
        11 February 2022 10: 43
        Yes, the flag in his hands! If this is a "volunteer", then this is no longer an American aircraft. Well, let him fight with the Russian Army, if "the gut is not thin." I don't think his adventures will be long... Especially since the F-15 is a pretty fat target on the radar.
        1. +3
          11 February 2022 10: 53
          "Moreover, the F-15 is a rather fat target on radar" ///
          ---
          Exactly the same as the Su-27 and Su-30.
          The S-300/400 radars detect this type of 4th generation aircraft very clearly.
          1. -2
            11 February 2022 11: 58
            yes, but the situation in terms of support will no longer be like in Iraq, where Ravens and AWACS stood behind the F-15.
            now the F-15s, as a gift or even gifts, will operate without the support of the West, while the Aerospace Forces will be supported by the not-so-modern but quite effective A-50U and Nebo-U, Container and Mi-8MTPR.
            and for a long time these F-15s will not live, especially on the ground, because there is nothing to protect the airfields from the kaklov.
            and the West needs such a blow to the image of Western aircraft without much success in countering the Russians?
        2. -3
          11 February 2022 12: 53
          Following your logic, Henderson should have inevitably lost to Emelianenko (after all, he is racially / spiritually disabled).
          Similar to Joshua/Povetkin.
          Big mistake to underestimate the enemy.
          The average flight time of the US Air Force exceeds that of the Russian Aerospace Forces.
          There are more planes, the possibilities for their production are an order of magnitude (10 or more times) greater.
      3. +3
        11 February 2022 10: 44
        Quote: voyaka uh
        There is a concept: "volunteers".
        Russian volunteers fought in Donbass.
        Russia does not deny this.
        Volunteers from Europe can fight in Ukraine.
        As if, under their own responsibility, without the participation of their
        States.
        Including the pilots.
        The plane is transferred "as a gift".
        The pilot came as a volunteer.

        winked No. On the Ukrainian side, there are already "volunteers" like dogs not cut from Europe and other neighborhoods, but the scenario you described is generally unlikely. Absolutely unrealistic and unrealizable scenario. Who will figure out whether this is a tourist or an enthusiast if the NATO plane works according to the Russian one? Will bring down all the planes that will hang out in the sky
        1. -4
          11 February 2022 12: 56
          Will bring down all the planes that will hang out in the sky

          So the "dangling" planes will attack themselves, they will have to exchange them, incurring combat losses.
          Question: bottleneck more pilots and aircraft, and the ability to produce new machines in greater numbers?
          1. +1
            11 February 2022 13: 04
            Quote: 3danimal
            Will bring down all the planes that will hang out in the sky

            So the "dangling" planes will attack themselves, they will have to exchange them, incurring combat losses.
            Question: bottleneck more pilots and aircraft, and the ability to produce new machines in greater numbers?

            Yes, with this, everything is clear, no one canceled the economy of the war.
            It’s just that Russia will not be indifferent to how NATO planes strike ours, believing that this will pass with impunity only because they do not enter the b / action zone and operate from the airspace of neighboring countries.
            1. 0
              11 February 2022 13: 34
              I understand what you mean. Yes, there will be head-on battles for air supremacy.
              I'm talking about the question of the price of "a trip to Kiev."
              And after all, all this will be accompanied by the exclusion of us from the financial and technological systems (rollback to the end of the 80s-90s).
              The price is unacceptable in my opinion.
              1. +1
                11 February 2022 16: 25
                Quote: 3danimal
                The price is unacceptable in my opinion.

                This is if you do not look at what is at stake ...
                And if according to the Hamburg account, then - "all as one", and "we will not stand up for the price"!
                What can I not say about "wild geese". Dying for dollars is not the same thing as dying for your own land, free from Bandera's scum!
                1. -2
                  11 February 2022 16: 55
                  This is if you do not look at what is at stake ...

                  What is at stake for me, who lives in the Krasnoyarsk Territory?
                  Loss of currency savings? Empty shelves in electronics stores and a radical rise in the price of its leftovers?
                  An even greater increase in food prices and a decrease in purchasing power?
                  Dying for dollars

                  If you forgot, the most combat-ready units of the RF Armed Forces are contract soldiers. It turns out that they will die for rubles?
                  for their land, free from Bandera evil spirits!

                  Your land? Someone invaded Rostov or Voronezh?
                  Is the main “Banderite” a Jew by nationality, President Zelensky? (As far as I remember the story, Bandera and his comrades would be very upset by such a choice).
                  Not glued request
                  1. +1
                    11 February 2022 19: 36
                    Quote: 3danimal
                    What's at stake for me

                    And the assessment of the situation with Ukraine in NATO by Lavrov and Putin, apparently, does not suit you. I see you all measure in Navalnov's way: with devices and sausage. You are talking some nonsense about our contractors ... From the former, or what?
                    1. 0
                      11 February 2022 19: 54
                      And the assessment of the situation with Ukraine in NATO by Lavrov and Putin

                      Lavrov is completely dependent, in comparison with the president. Surrounded by such lovers of conspiracy theories as Patrushev, who apparently fell under the influence of the ideas of quite strange personalities, like the former general of the FSO B. Ratnikov.
                      https://rg.ru/2006/12/22/gosbezopasnostj-podsoznanie.html

                      You are talking nonsense about our contractors
                      Can you argue with reason?

                      I see you all measure in Navalnov's way: with devices and sausage

                      I don't know what or what Meriet Navalnov.
                      For myself and my family, I want at least NOT a deterioration in the standard of living, which I do not observe. Any ideological remakes are secondary.
                      (I noticed: the better a person is educated and the better he was able to realize his potential in terms of income, the more he shares this position)
                      Of course, this does not apply to a handful of the elite, sitting on a budget ...
                      1. +1
                        11 February 2022 20: 11
                        Quote: 3danimal
                        Can you argue with reason?

                        Yes, at least twice!
                        "Contract soldiers" are military professionals who perform complex and responsible work in the maintenance of military equipment and the performance of duties of military service, placing increased demands on the knowledge, skills, state of physical fitness and health of a soldier. They devote the best years of their lives to this. In addition, many are married. And a man is obliged to adequately support his family. The state pays for all this. Moreover, in parts of constant readiness - increased.
                        If you are not satisfied with this state of affairs, remember Napoleon's words about the fate of those "leaders" who do not want to feed their own army. And you can shove the disparaging "contractors" at a well-known address. A decent salary for the work done to ensure the country's security is not a whim of someone, but a normal assessment of the military labor of people in uniform, because military service is a special kind of "sovereign" service.
                        I hope I have explained my position on this matter clearly.
                        PS / For the mistake made in the word MERIT, I apologize to the "graphomaniac" from the Krasnoyarsk Territory. Yes
                      2. 0
                        11 February 2022 21: 41
                        Contract soldiers are professional servicemen who perform complex and responsible work in the maintenance of military equipment and the performance of military service duties, placing increased demands on the knowledge, skills, physical condition and health of a serviceman. They devote the best years of their lives to this. In addition, many married.A man is obliged to adequately support his family.For all this, the state pays a monetary allowance.

                        Question: what of what you said does not apply to the military, receiving dollars (pounds, euros) instead of rubles?
                      3. +2
                        12 February 2022 11: 03
                        Quote: 3danimal
                        which of the things you said does not apply to the military who receive dollars (pounds, euros) instead of rubles?

                        In Donbass, they do not protect THEIR HOUSE, their families from destruction. They are fighting for the interests of the Bandera bastards.
                      4. +1
                        12 February 2022 13: 14
                        The American military in the Donbass are fighting for the interests of .. Zelensky? request
                        Is Donetsk region not part of Ukraine?
      4. +3
        11 February 2022 10: 53
        Quote: voyaka uh
        There is a concept: "volunteers".
        The pilot came as a volunteer.


        Listen, dear Warrior Wow, you are here with such shoulder straps !!! ... Moreover, I have no doubt that in the IDF you have both a position and a rank no less, but to carry such a blizzard about a volunteer pilot, excuse me, you can current on drunk head!

        Although today is Friday, you may have already put 100-150 grams behind your collar (I don’t know if it’s possible for you by faith or other considerations, it’s just that a normal person won’t write such a flood on a sober head)?

        But, if this "thought" of yours is developed, then he (the pilot) does not receive travel allowances and salaries for the duration of his, so to speak, voluntary mission, all the pilots took vacations at their own expense, while in the reports they wrote that they had become over time serving as a single combat organism, along with their SERVICE combat aircraft Fu-15, that they feel like themselves, and therefore those (aircraft) also go on vacation to participate with their "rider" in volunteer affairs. Do not offer fuel and ground handling - the hussars do not take money, at their own expense they refuel their war horses and do pre-flight preparations themselves and do all other technical measures, well, or psheks will help "for free", they (psheks) have up to *** money (lots of).
      5. +4
        11 February 2022 10: 54
        Quote: voyaka uh

        Including the pilots.
        The plane is transferred "as a gift".
        The pilot came as a volunteer.
        Lyokha, whether we were there or not, you have no documents! And if the United States "gives" Ukraine an F-15 without US Air Force identification marks, then who will condemn us for shooting them down? Telavi? wink
      6. +1
        11 February 2022 11: 33
        Quote: voyaka uh
        The plane is transferred "as a gift".

        The planes are provided by the country for which the volunteers are fighting. Usually.
      7. +1
        11 February 2022 11: 43
        Quote: voyaka uh
        The plane is transferred "as a gift".
        The pilot came as a volunteer.

        Uncle Sam is not Santa Claus.
        It's time to introduce the concept of "malicious".
    2. +1
      11 February 2022 11: 02
      They can hang around there, but if they want to participate on the side of Ukraine, then this can already lead to a full-fledged war

      Here they are more likely to consider the Turkish-Israeli option
      to fire from the extreme edge of their airspace, under the pretext that someone flew in the wrong place, crossed the border. Here, consider 100-150 km on average from the border they can shoot through without serious consequences (Israel, the Turks are an example of this)
      1. +2
        11 February 2022 11: 23
        Quote: spirit
        They can hang around there, but if they want to participate on the side of Ukraine, then this can already lead to a full-fledged war

        Here they are more likely to consider the Turkish-Israeli option
        to fire from the extreme edge of their airspace, under the pretext that someone flew in the wrong place, crossed the border. Here, consider 100-150 km on average from the border they can shoot through without serious consequences (Israel, the Turks are an example of this)

        So after all, the stick is usually "two-edged" Yes
  4. +3
    11 February 2022 10: 27
    Aircraft can take part in operations or divert the attention of the Russian military to themselves.

    Does this mean that Russian air defense can shoot down US planes and bomb the points of deployment of these planes, in particular the Emari airfield, located near the Russian border?
  5. +4
    11 February 2022 10: 29
    Here, the crazy statements of UK and US officials do not have time to digest.
    There is no need to react to the statements of journalists in any way, because modern media do not have a word of truth, neither honor nor conscience.
    1. +1
      11 February 2022 12: 12
      no responsibility for your market.
  6. avg
    +1
    11 February 2022 10: 31
    How deeply the concept of one's own exclusivity sits in mattress covers. This bold scribbler does not even allow the thought of responding to "taking part in the operation" and will wake up only when A V G is knocked on his window with spray from the tsunami.
  7. +4
    11 February 2022 10: 33
    The American observer does not rule out possible participation transferred to Poland F-15 fighters in defense of Ukraine in the event of an "attack" by the Russian Federation

    Still ... True, Russia does not exclude the possibility of the entire American arsenal concentrated in Europe to take part in an attack on its territory for the slightest, even a potential reason ... This is how the Americans have it: shake some kind of test tube in front of everyone's nose and...
    What to do - democracy!
  8. +2
    11 February 2022 10: 33
    The American observer does not exclude the possible participation of the F-15 fighters transferred to Poland in the defense of Ukraine in the event of an “attack” by the Russian Federation

    Well, firstly, Russia is not going to attack, from the word at all, on anyone.
    Secondly, fools do not understand that in the event of an attack by Russian troops with pin dosniks, "gifts" in the form of missiles for various purposes and equipment will fly to them across the ocean, to their homes along with their families.
    So the best thing they can do for their families, for the sake of their health, is to stay away from Russian troops and Russian borders.
    You look and there will be where to return after the end of the contract. lol
  9. +2
    11 February 2022 10: 36
    American press does not rule out the possible participation of the F-15 fighters transferred to Poland in the defense of Ukraine in the event of an “attack” by Russia. Aircraft can take part in operations or divert the attention of the Russian military to themselves.
    As they already got, these debiloid-like! laughing
  10. +1
    11 February 2022 10: 38
    It is clear where the American expert is driving - the United States is going to bite off a fat piece from Ukraine, organize their zone of occupation there, and protect it by all means - by analogy with the oil-bearing regions of Syria
  11. -1
    11 February 2022 10: 46
    And what can ours oppose them?
    No, it's technically clear, but in real life?
    Here in the aforementioned Syria and the Americans, both the Turks and, especially the Jews, fly wherever they want, bomb whoever they want. Incl. and our planes and helicopters are shot down, and the Wagners are kneaded into the sand and nothing, our missiles do not fly to Ankara or Telaviv.
  12. +1
    11 February 2022 11: 05
    They can, but they won't. Do they need it?
  13. +1
    11 February 2022 11: 09
    The American observer does not exclude the possible participation of the F-15 fighters transferred to Poland in the defense of Ukraine in the event of an “attack” by the Russian Federation

    The hysteria is on the rise.
    British Foreign Minister Truss refused to recognize Rostov and Voronezh as regions of Russia

    https://ria.ru/20220211/trass-1772178465.html?utm_source=yxnews&utm_medium=desktop
  14. +2
    11 February 2022 11: 10
    So I think, should I now rejoice for our air defense or cry over the grief of American mothers, whose sons, being transferred to Poland, will start fighting for Ukraine?!
  15. -1
    11 February 2022 11: 27
    And in Russia they continue to draw red stripes and threaten with an answer. Maybe it's time to throw something on Cuba or Venezuela to support the freedom of Latin American countries.
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. 0
    11 February 2022 12: 00
    We decided to earn a no-fly zone over pshekami and panheads
    1. -1
      11 February 2022 13: 00
      Not enough will, to be limited by concern)
  18. -2
    11 February 2022 12: 10
    Purely theoretically - they can strike without entering the territory .. how does Israel do it .. so what? I will never believe in my life that our generals will give the go-ahead to shoot down an American over Polish territory, even if he fires missiles at ours .. ((
    1. +6
      11 February 2022 13: 16
      That is, they will shoot down ours in the airspace of the Russian Federation and we will limit ourselves to concern? No.
      Pretty controversial idea. This is not Syria for you, this is Russia. Here the people may not understand and easily ride in the 2024 elections and Channel One will not help.
  19. 0
    11 February 2022 12: 59
    Will there be a batch or not, what will intelligence tell us?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"