Military Review

Member of the European Parliament: Russia does not need a military conflict with Ukraine, it has enough of its own resources and problems

39

Russia will not invade Ukraine, it does not need to. All statements about alleged plans for a Russian offensive are Western propaganda. MEP Ivan David told the Czech publication Parlamentní listy about this.


The Czech politician is firmly convinced that Moscow has no plans to attack Kiev, Russia does not need a military conflict with Ukraine at all, it has enough of its own problems. The only option when the Russian army can hit the Armed Forces of Ukraine is Ukraine's attempt to resolve the issue in the Donbass by military means, in which case Russia will come out in defense of the Russian-speaking population.

In reality, Russia does not need Ukraine, the MEP is sure, if it does not hatch plans for the Donbass and its territory is not used as a springboard for an attack on Russia, Moscow will leave it to continue to wallow in debt and languish. She does not need a conflict with a country where hatred of Russia is elevated to the state level and marches are held in honor of veterans of the Ukrainian SS division.

Now the West accuses Russia of pulling its troops to the border of Ukraine, but this is a reaction to Kiev's attempts to resolve the Donbas issue by military means. Kiev is ready to attack the republics, Russia is trying to prevent this, Moscow has warned that it will defend the Donbass. At the same time, all Russian troops are located on their territory and conduct maneuvers inside the country.

In Europe, not everyone is in favor of a confrontation with Russia, although there are also plenty of supporters of tough measures. But the main supporter of the war is the United States, which intends to "bring peace" as it did in many countries, including Iraq, Libya, Vietnam, and so on.

The US is building bases on Russian borders and sending thousands of offensive troops to Europe, and our sweet official propaganda is that the threat comes from the Russian side.

- the politician said.

At present, the likelihood of a military conflict in Ukraine is not very high, but if it still breaks out, Russia will not be the initiator there, sums up the Czech politician.
Photos used:
https://twitter.com/mod_russia
39 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Egoza
    Egoza 8 February 2022 08: 43
    +11
    But it's interesting. If it comes to X hour, how many NATO countries will want to fight Russia? Or dumped, despite the union? No matter how the United States is in the minority.
    1. Civil
      Civil 8 February 2022 08: 46
      -9
      Quote: Egoza
      But it's interesting. If it comes to X hour, how many NATO countries will want to fight Russia? Or dumped, despite the union? No matter how the United States is in the minority.

      And who will ask? An exchange of nuclear strikes is the war with NATO.
      1. Egoza
        Egoza 8 February 2022 08: 53
        +8
        Quote: Civil
        An exchange of nuclear strikes is the war with NATO.

        Are you sure that they will immediately equip a vigorous loaf? Maybe for "humanitarian reasons" they can handle other missiles?
        1. Civil
          Civil 8 February 2022 09: 11
          -5
          Quote: Egoza
          Quote: Civil
          An exchange of nuclear strikes is the war with NATO.

          Are you sure that they will immediately equip a vigorous loaf? Maybe for "humanitarian reasons" they can handle other missiles?

          Well, this is the main tsimes - they have something to lose, but we, after privatization, do not. And yes, we are in heaven.
        2. Mikhail Sidorov
          Mikhail Sidorov 8 February 2022 09: 17
          +1
          Alas, they won't. Press conference of the GDP after talking with Macron. Where GDP speaks of the difference between the military potential of the Russian Federation and NATO. Only Tiao and Xiao can help us.
        3. Vladimir Mashkov
          Vladimir Mashkov 9 February 2022 15: 32
          +1
          Czech David is right! Russia does NOT need any unnecessary sacrifices, or a military conflict, or a war with Ukraine! EVERYTHING peace enforcement and the liberation of Ukraine and its people from Bandera and other evil spirits should be quick and almost bloodless! smile
    2. alex neym_2
      alex neym_2 8 February 2022 08: 48
      +2
      They will send observers at best.
    3. Pechkin
      Pechkin 8 February 2022 08: 48
      -7
      No matter how the United States is in the minority.
      In what minority, compared to whom?
      1. Egoza
        Egoza 8 February 2022 08: 57
        +5
        Quote: Pechkin
        In what minority, compared to whom?

        for example, Croatia immediately announced that it would not send its troops to Ukraine, and would withdraw it altogether if NATO decided to make war. How many countries will follow suit? How many NATO countries are really ready to fight with Russia?
        1. Alexander Salenko
          Alexander Salenko 8 February 2022 09: 14
          +6
          I support, will Greece go, for example, to save Poland, maybe Italy, or Spain? So the unity of NATO is another question.
          1. zadorin1974
            zadorin1974 8 February 2022 09: 35
            +4
            Good Alexander. they gave an unsuccessful example. If Russia ITSELF !!!! attacks Poland or the Tribaltic, then all NATO countries will fit in. Let's be honest. But if the Young Europeans themselves climb, then the majority will look here. , if Russia, then we are not in business here). But really, no one will send troops beyond the outskirts, but they will loudly condemn (at the same time, they will trade with both sides).
            1. Alexander Salenko
              Alexander Salenko 8 February 2022 09: 38
              +2
              Good, depending on how he attacks, because the question of security has been raised, a base is being built there, from which Russia can be hit. Yes, and squabbles around the Kaliningrad region and cries about the creation of a motorized rifle division there can be assessed as a ride to tear away the region. As far as I know, NATO is not obliged to provide assistance here and now. And Russia, the very first in FIG, does not need to attack Poland.
              1. zadorin1974
                zadorin1974 8 February 2022 09: 55
                +1
                I wrote to you that Poland is an unfortunate example. They don’t creak so much about the division.
            2. Leeds
              Leeds 8 February 2022 23: 18
              0
              Quote: zadorin1974
              Good Alexander. they gave an unsuccessful example. If Russia ITSELF !!!! attacks Poland or the Tribaltic, then all NATO countries will fit in. Let's be honest. But if the Young Europeans themselves climb, then the majority will look here. , if Russia, then we are not in business here). But really, no one will send troops beyond the outskirts, but they will loudly condemn (at the same time, they will trade with both sides).


              I would not check, knocking with the heel and chest, who will fit in, who will not fit in. We were very self-confident and brave in front of the loudest whips.

              The Ukrainians will still be sent to attack the LDNR by force, this will be the trigger.
        2. Pechkin
          Pechkin 8 February 2022 09: 27
          -4
          How many NATO countries are really ready to fight with Russia?
          We have only Belarus as allies, so what? And they need a lot of countries to make war with us on the territory of Ukraine. USA, Britain, Poland, Ukraine and financial assistance from others is enough.
    4. Evil543
      Evil543 8 February 2022 08: 59
      +1
      This whole hysteria is already too long.
      1. tihonmarine
        tihonmarine 8 February 2022 09: 45
        0
        Quote: Evil543
        This whole hysteria is already too long.

        The longer the song, the longer people sleep.
    5. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 8 February 2022 09: 43
      -1
      Quote: Egoza
      how many NATO countries will want to fight with Russia? Or dumped, despite the union? No matter how the United States is in the minority.

      But will the United States fight for Ukraine, at least in the majority, at least one will remain?
  2. pyagomail.com
    pyagomail.com 8 February 2022 08: 47
    +2
    the likelihood of a military conflict in Ukraine is not very high, but if it still breaks out, Russia will not be the initiator there
    I can give a couple more truths: the Volga flows into the Caspian Sea, and the horses eat oats... No, well, of course, it’s nice that some European deputies get something, but they don’t understand the main thing: Ukraine is a means to deter and weakening of Russia, so everything will continue.
    1. Alexander Salenko
      Alexander Salenko 8 February 2022 09: 16
      0
      The first statement is debatable. The fact that the Volga flows into the Caspian Sea is not entirely obvious. But essentially you are right.
  3. mojohed2012
    mojohed2012 8 February 2022 08: 49
    +4
    "Stop the thief!" The thief shouts, taking out the loot into the street.
    "Beat him. He started first!" Hooligans who attacked a passerby in a crowd are shouting.
  4. cniza
    cniza 8 February 2022 08: 53
    +6
    At present, the likelihood of a military conflict in Ukraine is not very high, but if it still breaks out, Russia will not be the initiator there, sums up the Czech politician.


    Hound a normal person...
  5. Klingon
    Klingon 8 February 2022 08: 58
    +2
    Quote: Egoza
    Quote: Civil
    An exchange of nuclear strikes is the war with NATO.

    Are you sure that they will immediately equip a vigorous loaf? Maybe for "humanitarian reasons" they can handle other missiles?

    So they can strike with tactical nuclear warheads, but it seems that they even prescribed it in the constitution. The Russian Federation reserves the right to use Yadren-Baton even if an attack on its territory is a conventional weapon
    1. Alexander Salenko
      Alexander Salenko 8 February 2022 09: 16
      +1
      So why, if you can decide without a nucleus?
  6. rocket757
    rocket757 8 February 2022 09: 06
    +3
    Member of the European Parliament: Russia does not need a military conflict with Ukraine, it has enough of its own resources and problems
    . Hello again.
    Against the general background, the voice of reason ...
    1. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 8 February 2022 09: 48
      -1
      Quote: rocket757
      Against the general background, the voice of reason ...

      And in mental hospitals come across healthy people.
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 8 February 2022 11: 11
        +1
        Not everyone there, weaned to see and count.
        Most are silent in a rag, they don’t want to get under the liberal ice rink ...
        There are also those who are tired / tired of being afraid. It happens that way too.
        However, they could also find a clearing with tryn-grass and mow it as much as necessary!
  7. yuriy55
    yuriy55 8 February 2022 09: 31
    +4
    Member of the European Parliament: Russia does not need a military conflict with Ukraine, it has enough of its own resources and problems

    Sounds like:
    Europe does not need a military conflict with Russia, it has enough of its own risks and problems...
    yes
    1. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 8 February 2022 10: 02
      +1
      Quote: yuriy55
      Europe does not need a military conflict with Russia, it has enough of its own risks and problems...

      And which country has no problems now, even on Easter Island and there are enough problems -
      Crocodile is not caught
      coconut not growing
  8. riwas
    riwas 8 February 2022 09: 52
    +2
    In Europe, not everyone is in favor of a confrontation with Russia, although there are also plenty of supporters of tough measures. But the main supporter of the war is the United States, which intends to "bring peace" as it did in many countries, including Iraq, Libya, Vietnam, and so on.

    Still would. All US policy is based on the fact that whatever happens in the world, the US turns it all against Russia and, to a lesser extent, against China.
    1. DymOk_v_dYmke
      DymOk_v_dYmke 8 February 2022 10: 56
      0
      Quote: riwas
      All US policy is based on the fact that whatever happens in the world, the US turns it all against Russia and, to a lesser extent, against China.

      Yes, she is ready to turn against Germany as a junior competitor.
      On the sly, without advertising.
    2. yuriy55
      yuriy55 8 February 2022 11: 17
      0
      Quote: riwas
      whatever happens in the world, the United States turns it all against Russia

      Moreover, even in their own slovenliness and bungling, they are primarily looking for a Russian trace. Such is the pathology. In vain we slandered the Germans. This is what is good for a Russian, but for an American - death.
      By the way, about one version of the origin of the saying:
  9. Klingon
    Klingon 8 February 2022 10: 01
    0
    Quote: Valentina Salenko
    So why, if you can decide without a nucleus?

    Indeed, it can be good. But it can be bad laughing
  10. Esso
    Esso 8 February 2022 10: 20
    0
    What good words
  11. aszzz888
    aszzz888 8 February 2022 10: 43
    0
    The United States is building bases near Russian borders and sending thousands of soldiers with offensive weapons to Europe, and our dear official propaganda broadcasts that the threat comes from the Russian side, the politician said.
    Everything was laid out on the shelves. Clear and understandable. Only rabid Russophobes cannot understand this.
  12. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 8 February 2022 10: 44
    0
    The US is building bases on Russian borders and sending thousands of offensive troops to Europe, and our sweet official propaganda is that the threat comes from the Russian side.
    Probably in the European Parliament and about the European Parliament, you can’t say better. And most importantly, to the sore European point. For greater perception, add an epigraph to Gogol's "Inspector General" - "There is nothing to blame on the mirror if the face is crooked."
  13. 1536
    1536 8 February 2022 10: 54
    0
    Quote: Egoza
    But it's interesting. If it comes to X hour, how many NATO countries will want to fight Russia? Or dumped, despite the union? No matter how the United States is in the minority.

    That's right, but first the US must suffer a crushing defeat. The main thing is that "Stalingrad-2.0" does not happen on our or Ukrainian soil. Therefore, "hour X" is best avoided.
  14. iouris
    iouris 8 February 2022 11: 59
    +1
    Practice shows that Russia does not need anything at all. But Europe needs Russia's resources. Turkey and the EU are successors of the USSR.
  15. Tarasios
    Tarasios 9 February 2022 09: 31
    0
    An extremely sensible reasoned opinion