In Belarus, they recognized the threat to the security of the republic from Ukraine

68

Belarus is forced to consider the southern direction as a threat to its own security due to the behavior of Ukraine. This was stated by State Secretary of the Security Council of the country Alexander Volfovich.

Belarus had not previously considered the southern direction as a threat to its own security, however, based on an assessment of the military-political and strategic situation, it was forced to take measures to protect the Ukrainian direction, since it poses a threat, first of all, to the Union State.



According to Volfovich, within the framework of the joint Russian-Belarusian military exercises "Allied Resolve-2022" will be worked out, including the reflection of possible aggression from the south.

Meanwhile, Alexander Lukashenko does not believe in the likelihood of a war with a neighboring country, according to him, Ukraine will never attack Belarus. However, if this does happen, the war will last no more than two or three days, after which it will end with the victory of the Belarusian army.

The Belarusian leader noted the low level of training of the Ukrainian army, and called Kiev's loud statements "window dressing." In addition, as Lukashenka stressed, the current authorities of Ukraine will not agree to this, since Zelensky is afraid of war and will not make such a decision. According to him, as soon as "a little smell" of war, he "immediately collapsed."

Earlier, Minsk accused Kiev of concentrating significant forces on the border and warned of a decisive response in the event of an escalation of the situation. Kiev has denied plans to attack Belarus, but reconnaissance of the adjacent territory is being carried out regularly, which is confirmed by a Ukrainian drone that tried to approach the Brestsky training ground, where Russian-Belarusian exercises are being held. However, it was not possible to obtain data from the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the drone was shot down.
68 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +22
    6 February 2022 14: 36
    Ukraine is not a member of NATO, but the Republic of Belarus is a member of the CSTO.
    1. -9
      6 February 2022 14: 47
      Quote: knn54
      Ukraine is not a member of NATO, but the Republic of Belarus is a member of the CSTO.

      And what is it for.
      Syria is also not a member of the CSTO, but officially turned to the Russian Federation and Russia came to the rescue.
      Who said that Ukraine cannot apply for military assistance? And moreover, she is already doing this, but no one wants to seriously quarrel with Russia, which is why they send fighters to Bandera, who, as it was immediately indicated, will not fight for anything, and a certain amount of weapons that does not make the weather.
      1. +8
        6 February 2022 17: 12
        Quote: BABAY22
        Quote: knn54
        Ukraine is not a member of NATO, but the Republic of Belarus is a member of the CSTO.

        And what is it for.
        Syria is also not a member of the CSTO, but officially turned to the Russian Federation and Russia came to the rescue.

        Asking for help and being a member of a bloc are two very different things, as Odessans say. In the first case, this is a lengthy procedure with all sorts of approvals, voting, decision-making ..., in the second - an immediate response. The CSTO operation in Kazakhstan is an example of this.
    2. +8
      6 February 2022 14: 48
      It was not Belarus that recognized the threat, but Ukraine yelled that everything was gone .. Ze really collapsed. Even a finished and d and o t understands that it is used for roast.
      1. +7
        6 February 2022 17: 15
        Quote: 210ox
        Even a finished and d and o t understands that it is used for roast.

        It's too late to realize when it's already a frying pan under your ass. It's time to just molt, but where to?
        1. 0
          6 February 2022 17: 17
          Where? Just not on KVN ..
        2. 0
          6 February 2022 18: 02
          Leksander Grygorych, still That Political Weather Vane... But here, at least with the chair on which he sits, he has decided! Already a plus for him!
          1. -2
            7 February 2022 14: 51
            Minus you for plagiarism about the Weather Vane. The topic is hackneyed.
      2. +3
        6 February 2022 17: 30
        Quote: 210ox
        Ze really collapsed

        You are too elevating the so-called. "president" of the great and independent. Who is Ze? This is a puppet puppet (a kind of controlled theatrical puppet) and he does not solve anything there at all. Whatever the puppeteers tell him to do, he will do. They will order it to go down - it will go down, they will order it to become more active in the Donbass - it will become more active.
    3. +7
      6 February 2022 14: 49
      Quote: knn54
      Ukraine is not a member of NATO, but the Republic of Belarus is a member of the CSTO.

      The situation with the probability of starting a war is the same as ours. But whether it will or not - for the uncles in Washington as a pretext for inciting a local Eastern European war - is more than tasty. The chain of events is something like this - a provocation by the national battalions - the answer of the Belarusian border guards - the supply of the Armed Forces of Ukraine with all the slag that is there - the CSTO - Poland-Tribaltika and more - "the help of the West without direct participation in the war. And away we go ...

      One uncle is not understood in Washington. As a pretext for a global world war, this can also play. And Europe will get it in this case in such a way that it’s scary to think about it. In 1914, too, no one believed in the World War.
      1. +2
        6 February 2022 19: 15
        Quote: Zoldat_A
        One uncle is not understood in Washington. As a pretext for a global world war, this can also play. And Europe will get it in this case in such a way that it’s scary to think about it. In 1914, too, no one believed in the World War.

        The fact of the matter is that the uncles in Washington understand this very well. The fact that Europe can fall under the distribution is very much in their interests, just like in 1914 and 1941, on which they managed to raise a lot of money. But what these uncles really do not understand is that this time the United States itself can be washed away by the raised "wave". hi
        1. +2
          6 February 2022 21: 24
          hi
          Quote: Nyrobsky
          But what these uncles really do not understand is that this time the United States itself can be washed away by the raised "wave".

          Here I am absolutely about the same thing.
          The armament has changed "slightly" since 1914, and even since 1939. So there will be no World War III in Europe. It will REALLY be WORLDWIDE. And America will get no less than in the Second World Europe. Although even there Poland and Germany are difficult to compare with France and Holland.

          Let them think about it between poker and Congress. About the Third World War and how it will turn out for the USA.
          1. +1
            6 February 2022 21: 46
            Quote: Zoldat_A
            And America will get no less than in the Second World Europe. Although even there Poland and Germany are difficult to compare with France and Holland.

            This time, of all European countries, Germany is positioning itself as the most consistent opponent of the war with Russia and a supporter of a peaceful solution to all problems. Apparently, the vaccination received in 1945 is still valid, no matter how hard the mattress "coronavirus" shaking the European system tries. Until Germany officially expresses its readiness to participate in military graters with Russia, nothing will burn out on the mattresses, which they really do not like. They were inviting Scholz to the carpet in Washington, but he, referring to being busy, refused to travel and expressed his readiness to meet with Bidon at the G-7 summit. But he will meet with GDP on February 15th. hi
            1. 0
              6 February 2022 22: 07
              Quote: Nyrobsky
              Apparently, the vaccination received in 1945 is still valid, no matter how hard the mattress "coronavirus" shaking the European system tries.

              I wonder why that vaccine does not work on the Poles? Do they think they are French, who had cafes, restaurants and cinemas in Paris during the "occupation"? And, oh horror!, there were only three varieties of cheese in the shop and sometimes horse meat had to be eaten instead of foie gras.
              Poles forgot about their 6 million dead? Ah, I know! It was the Russian invaders who came and shot 6 million Poles. Did I guess the new Polish history? What do you think Dmitry?

              America can be justified by some other perverted logic - they did not see Warsaw, Kiev, or Lvov in 1945. Here they go to fight. Where are these?

              *By the way, there was recently a scandal regarding horse meat, when the UK supplied canned food (in my opinion) from horse meat to France. The French were offended, deciding that their worst friends were bullying. Like, they remind the French that they were in the "occupation" and, "starving", ate horse meat.
              1. 0
                6 February 2022 23: 25
                Quote: Zoldat_A
                I wonder why that vaccine does not work on the Poles? Do they think they are French, who had cafes, restaurants and cinemas in Paris during the "occupation"? And, oh horror!, there were only three varieties of cheese in the shop and sometimes horse meat had to be eaten instead of foie gras.
                Poles forgot about their 6 million dead? Ah, I know! It was the Russian invaders who came and shot 6 million Poles. Did I guess the new Polish history? What do you think Dmitry?

                I believe that the Poles, having imagined themselves to be the beloved wife of mattresses, want to challenge the leadership of Germany and try on the skullcap of the European main span. But, it seems to me, the Poles will repeatedly hiccup for these ambitions and they will be outcasts both for Europe and for Russia.
                1. 0
                  7 February 2022 02: 15
                  Quote: Nyrobsky
                  I believe that the Poles, having imagined themselves to be the beloved wife of mattresses, want to challenge the leadership of Germany and try on the skullcap of the European main span.

                  Pan ataman Gritian of Tauride, even without a gold reserve, the ataman was not quite himself - he was delighted with the "English" lantern, like a Papuan with beads. And what ataman from Popandopulo? One laugh...

                  So here too. Germany itself knows what place and to whom it licks, however, diligently trying to hide it. And what is the "locomotive of Europe" of these jesters, who, apart from ambition, have nothing in their souls?
  2. +2
    6 February 2022 14: 38
    Meanwhile, Alexander Lukashenko does not believe in the likelihood of war with a neighboring country, according to him, Ukraine will never attack Belarus.
    .... but it will be dirty, that's why they are Bandera, they don't care about Russia or Belarus.
  3. -19
    6 February 2022 14: 39
    The six-day war was, sort of like a five-day -
    too. dad goes to the record - four days and the title
    Generalissimo ahead of schedule.
    1. +13
      6 February 2022 14: 48
      Quote: sidoroff
      The six-day war was, sort of like a five-day -
      too. dad goes to the record - four days and the title
      Generalissimo ahead of schedule.

      The Slavs are not mattresses that wage war for 5-10 years, and then, losing diapers and abandoning allies, dump them so that they do not pile on to unacceptable damage.
      1. -6
        6 February 2022 15: 53
        Anyway, it happened...
        The Afghan war of the USSR lasted 9 years: from 1980 to 1989.
        The Caucasian War of the Russian Empire lasted 47 years:
        from 1817 to 1864 year.
        1. +5
          6 February 2022 15: 57
          Quote: voyaka uh
          Anyway, it happened...

          In no war, no matter how long it lasted, the Republic of Ingushetia, the USSR, the Russian Federation never shamefully fled, like mattresses from Vietnam, Afghanistan, etc. Learn history.
          1. -4
            6 February 2022 16: 56
            the mattresses are just stupid. don't know how to properly call a fail win. and everything is forgotten.
          2. -1
            7 February 2022 05: 41
            The Russian Empire (or no longer an empire, but not yet the USSR) shamefully fled from the 1st World War, abandoning its allies.
        2. 0
          6 February 2022 17: 03
          the first world. Brest Peace. this is not a Slavic thing. .
  4. -12
    6 February 2022 14: 44
    Well done Old Man - in three days and in dust :))
    But I didn’t like Nashego’s speech at the meeting with Orban at all.
    As if in some kind of confusion - and not there and not here.
    1. +8
      6 February 2022 14: 52
      Quote: DenisI
      As if in some kind of confusion - and not there and not here.

      Why - warned NATO that in this case there would be a big war. Although, on the other hand, the Anglo-Saxons not so long ago made a film about how Russia attacked the Baltic states and occupied it, and NATO thought and thought and decided: "Let it be so." Ukraine, in such a case, will be thrown without even thinking, unless they express concern.
      1. -11
        6 February 2022 14: 54
        And in **what case**?
        What should Americans do in this case?
        The weapons are sent, the soldiers are sent. What else is needed for the case? :))
        1. +3
          6 February 2022 15: 00
          Quote: DenisI
          And in **what case**?

          I quote Putin: "... if Ukraine decides to invade Crimea ..."
          1. -13
            6 February 2022 15: 03
            Ah, about what. Well it is clear.
            But as if our Ultimatum did not concern Crimea, but something completely different.
            1. -3
              6 February 2022 15: 12
              Quote: DenisI
              But as if our Ultimatum did not concern Crimea, but something completely different.

              This was not an ultimatum, but an urgent proposal to the West for collective security, proceeding from the condition that the security of some cannot be based on increased danger to others - security must be mutual.
              1. -10
                6 February 2022 15: 14
                So I say that the Partners put on ** an urgent offer **. Then what?
                Here is what interests me.
                1. -1
                  6 February 2022 15: 32
                  Quote: DenisI
                  on **strong offer** Partners put

                  I would not say that they put it down, just out of their Anglo-Saxon habit they are trying to scare us a little - they are bringing weapons to Ukraine, chatting a little with some kind of counter proposals, but we'll see. The fact that Russia came up with such "urgent proposals" means that it has a Colt in its pocket with which it is easier to negotiate.
                  1. -7
                    6 February 2022 15: 38
                    Do you believe in **colt? **
                    I confess that I don't.
                    But let the truth be on your side. Let's see.
                2. -1
                  6 February 2022 17: 55
                  However, you are fast! "Partners" themselves are not yet aware, but you want to know what will happen. But it seems to me (I do not pretend to be correct in my judgment) that "the gentlemen were warned. And therefore the gentlemen should not be offended," as Major McNab said from the movie "Captain Grant's children." And the gentlemen understood it. Hope.
        2. +2
          6 February 2022 15: 02
          Quote: DenisI
          And in **what case**?

          And before that, Ukraine will be accepted into NATO ...
        3. -1
          6 February 2022 15: 05
          Quote: DenisI
          What else is needed for the case? :))

          The beginning of the military operation in the Donbass
    2. -7
      6 February 2022 15: 27
      Well, maybe because Putin thinks what he says, and Luka has not been responsible for the market for a long time? Not to mention the fact that the purpose of the meeting with Orban is to improve relations with Hungary and bring discord into the NATO camp.
      1. -9
        6 February 2022 15: 30
        in short again HPP.
        Well, it's possible. So be it.
        1. -1
          6 February 2022 15: 31
          Putin has been in power long enough to know what to do, or is it better, like the village Khrushchev, to beat a boot on the podium and threaten Kuzkina Mother? The task is not to make the enemy unite, but to make him NOT want to fight with us.
          1. -6
            6 February 2022 15: 42
            I will not argue, we have different views on power.
            But note that after Khrushchev's boot hit, there was no war.
            Let's see what comes out now.
            1. -3
              6 February 2022 15: 46
              the cold truth has gone to another level.
  5. -1
    6 February 2022 14: 53
    ... The end of the article invigorates
  6. 0
    6 February 2022 15: 03
    This was stated by State Secretary of the Security Council of the country Alexander Volfovich.
    Oh ... the Syabry have the same thing, they have their own Volfovich ...
  7. 0
    6 February 2022 15: 17
    according to Euronews they are being driven - Batko said that he was ready to leave his post if the situation was stable. And they show his interview, where he says this.
    1. -3
      6 February 2022 16: 42
      Quote: Nexcom
      according to Euronews they are being driven - Batko said that he was ready to leave his post if the situation was stable. And they show his interview, where he says this.

      there he said that he was going to sit until the children))
      so as far as I understand, stability in Belarus will not come soon))
      1. 0
        6 February 2022 16: 44
        yes, it is clear what was said to the public.
  8. +9
    6 February 2022 15: 56
    It must be admitted that Ukraine did everything so that Belarus, loyal to it, began to consider it as an enemy.
    1. -3
      6 February 2022 16: 40
      considers it as an enemy, and delivers fuel to Ukraine as expected))
      and they decided to ship their potassium through Odessa, which the allies from Russia probably don’t help much))
      1. 0
        6 February 2022 16: 58
        who refuses to earn hard cash from them? "war is war and lunch is on schedule"
      2. +2
        6 February 2022 18: 50
        Quote: www3
        Yes, and they decided to ship their potassium through Odessa


        The Ukrainians proposed, we agreed. Today, it seems, they said that no, we will not ship in Odessa. That is, they were also stopped," Lukashenka said in an interview for the Solovyov Live YouTube channel.

        https://ria.ru/20220206/lukashenko-1771334743.html
        1. -3
          6 February 2022 19: 06
          Quote: Flood
          Quote: www3
          Yes, and they decided to ship their potassium through Odessa


          The Ukrainians proposed, we agreed. Today, it seems, they said that no, we will not ship in Odessa. That is, they were also stopped," Lukashenka said in an interview for the Solovyov Live YouTube channel.

          https://ria.ru/20220206/lukashenko-1771334743.html


          yeah, they offered it, but out of the kindness of his heart, he agreed))
          probably also sells fuel out of desperation))
          ally such an ally)
          1. +2
            6 February 2022 19: 13
            the news is not about
            Odessa does not take cargo
            1. -3
              6 February 2022 19: 15
              key word-Ukraine refused!!!
              I understand if Lukashenka refused and took him through Russia, but it turns out that he first had a fight with all the neighbors, and then he runs around and looks for how to carry potassium.
              1. +2
                6 February 2022 19: 41
                Quote: www3
                Ukraine refused

                I understand what you mean
                but Ukraine has not yet refused
                perhaps they will find free capacities in another port
                1. -4
                  6 February 2022 19: 46
                  in Ukraine, there are no such capacities from the word - at all.
                  the maximum that they could handle was 2 million tons, but 12 are needed !!!
                  and it doesn’t bother you that Ukraine, striving for Europe, etc., takes up the transportation of sanctioned goods ???)) and by the way, Belarus blocked the transportation of goods from the west towards Ukraine)
                  1. +2
                    6 February 2022 20: 06
                    Quote: www3
                    in Ukraine, there are no such capacities from the word - at all.
                    the maximum that they could handle was 2 million tons

                    sea ​​specialized port "Nika-Tera" in Nikolaev - design capacity of 1 million 800 thousand tons per year
                    Yuzhny Commercial Seaport has two specialized complexes:
                    Odessa port plant - 3 million 600 thousand tons per year
                    TIS-Mineral fertilizers - 2 million 250 thousand tons per year

                    already more than seven and a half million tons
                    sometimes complexes overload more than their design capacity
                    1. -3
                      6 February 2022 20: 07
                      well, scrape a little more and load all the potassium)))
                      1. +2
                        6 February 2022 20: 08
                        Quote: www3
                        well, scrape a little more and load all the potassium)))

                        why should I?
                        let the Belarusians transport through Russian ports
                        I can't stand lies
                        and love precision
                      2. -4
                        6 February 2022 20: 11
                        i.e. all of Ukraine should tighten up, throw everything away and start loading only Belarusian potassium ???)))
                        and the most important question - the profitability of this action??
                        they are so truthful))
                      3. +1
                        6 February 2022 20: 22
                        Quote: www3
                        the whole of Ukraine should strain, throw everything away and start loading only Belarusian potassium?

                        these capacities are now only partially loaded
                        after all, I indicated precisely the capacities for transshipment of fertilizers
                        if I were in charge of the Ukrainian port, I would do everything to get such a tasty morsel
                        Quote: www3
                        the most important question - the profitability of this action?

                        obviously more expensive than Klaipeda
                        but Belarusians have little choice
                      4. -2
                        6 February 2022 20: 27
                        keep watching)
  9. +1
    6 February 2022 17: 20
    "According to him, as soon as "a little smell" of war, he "immediately collapsed" ..." (c) Out of fear, they can rush into all serious. Their brains are already tense, and the lumps may turn off.
  10. +2
    6 February 2022 18: 25
    Maybe I'm wrong, but, in my opinion, NATO members act in defense of one of the countries included in the bloc only if it has been attacked. And then certain countries, under a plausible pretext, may refuse to provide real assistance. If, on the other hand, one of the NATO members initiates military operations on its own, not coordinated or approved by other members of the bloc, then none of the other NATO members is obliged to come to his aid.
    1. +1
      6 February 2022 18: 27
      Yes, they chkhali on their own rules, the first time they or what? They will come up with something for an excuse and adopt a collective document "As an exception, given the current situation .... trawl-la trawl-la", etc. And then Jens, in a penetrating voice with a sad muzzle of his face (like, well, we wanted the best, but this aggressive Raska ....) will sound to everyone. And everyone hides.
  11. 0
    6 February 2022 18: 47
    "Lukashenko emphasized that the current authorities of Ukraine will not agree to this, since Zelensky is afraid of war and will not make such a decision"
    So I still do not understand the threat comes or ....
    1. +1
      6 February 2022 19: 56
      Ukraine is not only a military threat. More and others
      types of threats. For example, the threat of clouding the mind.
      1. 0
        6 February 2022 20: 18
        There have some already long ago all dimmed. And the further the stronger and irreversibly cloudy further. Only now, for their clouding, completely different people in neighboring territories are paying with their lives. But few people in power care about this, unfortunately ...
  12. -1
    6 February 2022 21: 08
    in Minsk accused Kiev of concentrating significant forces on the border and warned of a decisive response

    A haberdasher and a cardinal is a force! smile