Military Review

S-400 Triumph air defense system sent to Belarus

50
S-400 Triumph air defense system sent to Belarus

Air defense forces will also be involved in checking the response forces of the Union State. Therefore, the S-400 Triumph air defense system was sent to Belarus.


This was reported by the press service of the Russian Defense Ministry.

Upon arrival, the S-400 air defense system is preparing to be transferred to combat duty.

The equipment was transferred from the east of Russia. Previously, it was part of the Air Force and Air Defense Forces, which are at the disposal of the Eastern Military District.

Immediately after arrival, the Russian air defense servicemen will make a forced march to the Brest region. There they will prepare the equipment for work and disguise the place of their new deployment. When the complex is ready to perform combat missions, it will become part of the Unified Regional Air Defense System of Belarus and Russia.

It is known that the first stage of testing the joint reaction forces of the two states is the redeployment of personnel and equipment in order to form military groups on Belarusian territory until February 9. They will take under protection the strategic objects of Belarus and the border of the republic.

The next stage is the Allied Resolve 2022 maneuvers, which will last from 10 to 20 February. On them, the military personnel of the two states will practice repelling an attack by an external enemy, as well as measures to counter terrorist threats.
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
50 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Dart2027
    Dart2027 3 February 2022 11: 25
    +5
    Kiev, Poland and the Baltic States have not protested yet?
    1. 210ox
      210ox 3 February 2022 12: 02
      +10
      In Belarus, this should be placed on a permanent basis.
      1. vitvit123
        vitvit123 3 February 2022 12: 16
        0
        And we did not want to post or dad "danced"?
        1. 210ox
          210ox 3 February 2022 12: 28
          +3
          I do not know the intricacies of this "disco", but I saw something else, how in the early 2000s the infrastructure was liquidated in the Smolensk region. Let me remind you, Smolensk region, and then Moscow. I hope everything will be ok there now.
          1. Uncle lee
            Uncle lee 3 February 2022 13: 47
            +2
            Quote: 210ox
            Let me remind you, Smolensk region, and then Moscow.

            was at the disposal of the Eastern Military District.
            A DV not bare? There were some of them here: one, two and counted! request
            1. 210ox
              210ox 3 February 2022 14: 02
              +3
              Maybe. And that's bad. Probably decided to go where it is needed. On this issue, I argued yesterday about the "access zone" over the country. Colleagues ran away from me that everything is in order with the air defense-missile defense system. Not convinced. But this is my opinion
            2. YOUR
              YOUR 3 February 2022 15: 02
              +4
              That's the question that one air defense system does not solve anything. We need infrastructure. We need reconnaissance equipment, we need automated control systems. The regiment was torn apart. And on the spot, the traffic rules were weakened and many problems arrived there and would not solve.
              1. 28st region
                28st region 4 February 2022 08: 34
                +1
                You need to indicate your presence. That's all
          2. vitvit123
            vitvit123 3 February 2022 15: 26
            -3
            Why is the beginning of the 2000s in Russia, in the context of the 25-year multi-vector Luka and the fact that Belarus needs the military infrastructure of Russia or Ross. Production ?
            1. 210ox
              210ox 3 February 2022 15: 29
              0
              To the need to defend. The war is on.
              1. vitvit123
                vitvit123 3 February 2022 15: 31
                -2
                Even in the first comment, I tried to convey to you that not everything depends and depended on us ... there the multi-vector is very afraid for the throne ... now, of course, the situation has not changed much, but for 25 years he was the first opponent of joint actions ..
                1. 210ox
                  210ox 3 February 2022 15: 33
                  0
                  Not all, right. I hope it got there. To whom it is necessary (multi-vector)
                  1. vitvit123
                    vitvit123 3 February 2022 15: 40
                    -2
                    Maybe it got there .. but my opinion, if it got there, then he would stop doing garbage with independence, but would go down in history as a person who united Russia with a torn off region .. there, probably, only one thing came up: a deflection under Russia = his throne and power...
    2. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 3 February 2022 12: 21
      +3
      Quote: Dart2027
      Kiev, Poland and the Baltic States have not protested yet?

      And why should Poland, Ukraine and the Baltic states protest, they don’t have aviation, and the Triumph air defense system does not work on ground targets.
      1. 210ox
        210ox 3 February 2022 12: 30
        +1
        They will fidget from any "extra" ax in the Belarusian household store.
        1. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 3 February 2022 12: 32
          +5
          Quote: 210ox
          They will fidget from any "extra" ax in the Belarusian household store.

          They squirm from everything, not only from the ax in the household store, well, what can you do if lice and bedbugs are wound up in one place.
          1. 210ox
            210ox 3 February 2022 15: 34
            +1
            An ax against lice and bedbugs in one place is powerless. We need a flamethrower.
      2. Dart2027
        Dart2027 3 February 2022 13: 34
        -1
        Quote: tihonmarine
        SAM "Triumph" does not work on ground targets

        Do you think they understand it?
        1. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 3 February 2022 13: 57
          +1
          Quote: Dart2027
          Do you think they understand it?

          Jane Psaki has not answered this question yet - she thinks, or she copes with the experts.
    3. Sergey M. Karasev
      Sergey M. Karasev 3 February 2022 14: 08
      +1
      Definitely screamed. wassat
  2. yuriy55
    yuriy55 3 February 2022 11: 29
    0
    Topic from January 21, 2022:
    https://topwar.ru/191405-minoborony-perebrasyvaet-v-belorussiju-zrs-s-400-iz-sostava-obedinenija-vvs-i-pvo-vostochnogo-voennogo-okruga.html
    Everything has already been said... yes
  3. prior
    prior 3 February 2022 11: 30
    +1
    conducting maneuvers "Allied Resolve - 2022", which will last from 10 to 20 February.

    Can the date from February 10 to February 20 be considered the date of the beginning of the liberation of Ukraine from the Bandera and Anglo-Saxon invaders?
    Not?!
    Oh what a pity.... request
    1. Andrei Nikolaevich
      Andrei Nikolaevich 3 February 2022 11: 36
      +6
      In Ukraine, half of the population is latent Bandera. Why "release" them? Let's wait until they start killing each other. No need to interfere with them.
      1. Flooding
        Flooding 3 February 2022 11: 42
        +2
        Quote: Andrey Nikolaevich
        In Ukraine, half of the population is latent Bandera.

        do you propose to wait until the share increases to 90%? Or up to 100%?
        rarely resort to "minus"
        the same case
        1. just exp
          just exp 3 February 2022 12: 29
          +1
          Bandera there are 2/3, and they will start to squabble.
          those for Russia at such a moment simply should not stick out and not show their opinion, and the Bandera offspring will begin to gnaw at each other that he loves Bandera more than his opponent.
          I know that many people think that the revolution of 1917 was a people's revolution, but I will go against them (although I am an ardent Stalinist and Stalin for me is almost the standard of the right person on the "throne").
          remember how in the 20s, when the country was plundered by the "gevolutionary" and there was nothing left to rob, they began to squabble among themselves (which Stalin skillfully used). and there was a situevina one by one with a ruin (yes, the sponsors were all the same as those of the maydaun, read who the relatives of Leiba Bronstein were and where he ate before the revolution, well, why did Putin promise when the hubbad announced that they should be returned their library and the rest, too, what if we raise the topic of a sealed wagon), and there, too, the one who shouted louder that he was for the revolution and how he loves Lenin "won" too.
          everything that will be has already been, just do not stop the abscess from ripening, yes, when the abscess bursts there will be a lot of pus, but this is necessary for the health of the whole organism.
          1. Flooding
            Flooding 3 February 2022 12: 37
            +1
            Quote: just explo
            Bandera there are 2/3, and they will start to squabble.

            do not trifle
            write 4/5 - paper endure
            1. just exp
              just exp 3 February 2022 12: 52
              0
              I won’t say for 21 years, but in 19 there was an “independent survey”, in parentheses because it was Western, but generally correct because it was attached to a closed report on mattresses (that is, the static data is correct), so for them 60+% supported maydaun (I don’t remember now 61 or 64 percent) and joining NATO and the EU, 18 percent abstained, the rest believed that maydaun only worsened the state of the ruins.
              1. Flooding
                Flooding 3 February 2022 15: 28
                +1
                Quote: just explo
                I won’t say for 21 years, but in 19 there was an “independent survey”, in parentheses because it was Western, but generally correct because it was attached to a closed report on mattresses (that is, the static data is correct), so for them 60+% supported Maidaun (now I don’t remember 61 or 64 percent)

                number of respondents?
                survey geography?
                objectivity of the survey?
                link?

                do not play along with those who are trying with all their might to make the people of Ukraine hostile to Russians
                1. just exp
                  just exp 3 February 2022 16: 36
                  0
                  I'll find the link. there was an article about a closed UWB report on the ruin.
                  and the people of the ruins are already hostile to the Russians, this is a fact, and finally take off your rose-colored glasses.
                  1. Flooding
                    Flooding 3 February 2022 16: 43
                    0
                    Quote: just explo
                    the people of the ruins are already hostile to the Russians, this is a fact and finally take off your rose-colored glasses.

                    don't speak for everyone
                    taking on too much
                    once again boldly emphasize
                    thereby playing along with Bandera and the USA

                    nothing has passed
                    still fixable
                    but you want there to be an abyss between the two peoples

                    do not wait

                    Quote: just explo
                    I'll find the link. there was an article about a closed UWB report

                    or find
                    or admit that your words are not true
                  2. Flooding
                    Flooding 4 February 2022 13: 15
                    0
                    Quote: just explo
                    I'll find the link.

                    not found yet?
        2. Andrei Nikolaevich
          Andrei Nikolaevich 3 February 2022 16: 25
          0
          You can "run". I propose to wait until they destroy each other, completely.
          1. Flooding
            Flooding 3 February 2022 16: 27
            +1
            Quote: Andrey Nikolaevich
            You can "run". I propose to wait until they destroy each other, completely.

            30 years just doing what they were waiting for
    2. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 3 February 2022 12: 23
      +1
      Quote: prior
      Can the date from February 10 to February 20 be considered the date of the beginning of the liberation of Ukraine from the Bandera and Anglo-Saxon invaders?
      Not?!

      The people of Ukraine must expel Bandera themselves (unless, of course, they don’t like Bandera).
  4. Dikson
    Dikson 3 February 2022 11: 44
    -13
    .. First, we sell our latest systems to the enemies, and then we remove them from one combat duty and drive them to the other side of the country ... A living example. how money obscures the eyes of officials, undermining the defense capability of the state .. Directly far-sighted and sensible policy! ..
    1. Dart2027
      Dart2027 3 February 2022 12: 01
      +8
      Quote: Dikson
      Directly far-sighted and sensible policy! ..

      The transfer of military equipment is a standard exercise practice. Even in the USSR.
      1. Dikson
        Dikson 3 February 2022 12: 39
        0
        In the USSR, and in a nightmare, it would never have occurred to anyone to sell the latest weapons to a NATO country ..
        1. Dart2027
          Dart2027 3 February 2022 13: 33
          +2
          Quote: Dikson
          In the USSR, and in a nightmare, no one would have thought of

          The United States will gladly occupy an empty niche and thank you.
    2. Dikson
      Dikson 3 February 2022 12: 02
      -3
      Wow .. What, isn't it written in the article? We also drive aircraft back and forth, close the gaps .. The facade was covered - the backside was bare ..)
      1. just exp
        just exp 3 February 2022 12: 38
        -1
        with aviation YET, but even then the situation is much better than 10 years ago, and we already have dozens of S-400 regiments (and yes, I am aware of the size of our country).
    3. Journalist
      Journalist 3 February 2022 13: 21
      +1
      And how else are you going to practice long-range transfers without the transfers themselves?
  5. Vaўkalak
    Vaўkalak 3 February 2022 11: 55
    +6
    Just on topic
    1. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 3 February 2022 12: 25
      +2
      Quote: Vaўkalak

      +1
      Just on topic

      Right on topic.
  6. Kesha1980
    Kesha1980 3 February 2022 11: 55
    +1
    Belarus protested to Ukraine in connection with the illegal crossing of the Belarusian border by a Ukrainian unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), the press service of the Belarusian Foreign Ministry said.

    The Ministry reported that on Thursday the Ukrainian Ambassador to the Republic of Belarus, Igor Kizim, was summoned to the Foreign Ministry, who was strongly protested in connection with purposeful launch unmanned aerial vehicle from Ukraine to the territory of Belarus," TASS reports.

    It's time to start "training" from the Shells as well.
  7. APASUS
    APASUS 3 February 2022 12: 09
    +4
    I think our S-400s should remain in Belarus, on a rotational basis, as our partners do
    1. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 3 February 2022 12: 12
      +4
      I agree ... and not all countries need to sell long-range air defense .....
    2. vitvit123
      vitvit123 3 February 2022 12: 21
      0
      Now the dad can agree, but before that he danced .. ours, not only from s400 to Belarus, they don’t mind taking all of Belarus (my opinion), but there used to be a multi-vector policy and more than the West were afraid of Russian oligarchs who at night they didn’t sleep, they wanted to swallow proud independence ... I mean that there alone the dancer is afraid in every possible way (at least he was joking and sabotaging) to get closer to Russia and not everything depends on us ..
  8. evgen1221
    evgen1221 3 February 2022 12: 22
    +1
    S-400 to fight including the terrorist threat. Well, soon there will be vigorous loaves too to fight terrorists.
  9. Ros 56
    Ros 56 3 February 2022 14: 17
    0
    Well, that's good, anti-aircraft gunners must work perfectly in different conditions and places, otherwise where will you gain experience if you sit in one place.
  10. Lt. Air Force stock
    Lt. Air Force stock 3 February 2022 18: 18
    0
    It is necessary to build AWACS aircraft. AWACS in the air significantly increase the effectiveness of the S-400, expanding the radio horizon at times.