S-400 Triumph air defense system sent to Belarus

50
S-400 Triumph air defense system sent to Belarus

Air defense forces will also be involved in checking the response forces of the Union State. Therefore, the S-400 Triumph air defense system was sent to Belarus.

This was reported by the press service of the Russian Defense Ministry.



Upon arrival, the S-400 air defense system is preparing to be transferred to combat duty.

The equipment was transferred from the east of Russia. Previously, it was part of the Air Force and Air Defense Forces, which are at the disposal of the Eastern Military District.

Immediately after arrival, the Russian air defense servicemen will make a forced march to the Brest region. There they will prepare the equipment for work and disguise the place of their new deployment. When the complex is ready to perform combat missions, it will become part of the Unified Regional Air Defense System of Belarus and Russia.

It is known that the first stage of testing the joint reaction forces of the two states is the redeployment of personnel and equipment in order to form military groups on Belarusian territory until February 9. They will take under protection the strategic objects of Belarus and the border of the republic.

The next stage is the Allied Resolve 2022 maneuvers, which will last from 10 to 20 February. On them, the military personnel of the two states will practice repelling an attack by an external enemy, as well as measures to counter terrorist threats.
  • Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

50 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    3 February 2022 11: 25
    Kiev, Poland and the Baltic States have not protested yet?
    1. +10
      3 February 2022 12: 02
      In Belarus, this should be placed on a permanent basis.
      1. 0
        3 February 2022 12: 16
        And we did not want to post or dad "danced"?
        1. +3
          3 February 2022 12: 28
          I do not know the intricacies of this "disco", but I saw something else, how in the early 2000s the infrastructure was liquidated in the Smolensk region. Let me remind you, Smolensk region, and then Moscow. I hope everything will be ok there now.
          1. +2
            3 February 2022 13: 47
            Quote: 210ox
            Let me remind you, Smolensk region, and then Moscow.

            was at the disposal of the Eastern Military District.
            A DV not bare? There were some of them here: one, two and counted! request
            1. +3
              3 February 2022 14: 02
              Maybe. And that's bad. Probably decided to go where it is needed. On this issue, I argued yesterday about the "access zone" over the country. Colleagues ran away from me that everything is in order with the air defense-missile defense system. Not convinced. But this is my opinion
            2. +4
              3 February 2022 15: 02
              That's the question that one air defense system does not solve anything. We need infrastructure. We need reconnaissance equipment, we need automated control systems. The regiment was torn apart. And on the spot, the traffic rules were weakened and many problems arrived there and would not solve.
              1. +1
                4 February 2022 08: 34
                You need to indicate your presence. That's all
          2. -3
            3 February 2022 15: 26
            Why is the beginning of the 2000s in Russia, in the context of the 25-year multi-vector Luka and the fact that Belarus needs the military infrastructure of Russia or Ross. Production ?
            1. 0
              3 February 2022 15: 29
              To the need to defend. The war is on.
              1. -2
                3 February 2022 15: 31
                Even in the first comment, I tried to convey to you that not everything depends and depended on us ... there the multi-vector is very afraid for the throne ... now, of course, the situation has not changed much, but for 25 years he was the first opponent of joint actions ..
                1. 0
                  3 February 2022 15: 33
                  Not all, right. I hope it got there. To whom it is necessary (multi-vector)
                  1. -2
                    3 February 2022 15: 40
                    Maybe it got there .. but my opinion, if it got there, then he would stop doing garbage with independence, but would go down in history as a person who united Russia with a torn off region .. there, probably, only one thing came up: a deflection under Russia = his throne and power...
    2. +3
      3 February 2022 12: 21
      Quote: Dart2027
      Kiev, Poland and the Baltic States have not protested yet?

      And why should Poland, Ukraine and the Baltic states protest, they don’t have aviation, and the Triumph air defense system does not work on ground targets.
      1. +1
        3 February 2022 12: 30
        They will fidget from any "extra" ax in the Belarusian household store.
        1. +5
          3 February 2022 12: 32
          Quote: 210ox
          They will fidget from any "extra" ax in the Belarusian household store.

          They squirm from everything, not only from the ax in the household store, well, what can you do if lice and bedbugs are wound up in one place.
          1. +1
            3 February 2022 15: 34
            An ax against lice and bedbugs in one place is powerless. We need a flamethrower.
      2. -1
        3 February 2022 13: 34
        Quote: tihonmarine
        SAM "Triumph" does not work on ground targets

        Do you think they understand it?
        1. +1
          3 February 2022 13: 57
          Quote: Dart2027
          Do you think they understand it?

          Jane Psaki has not answered this question yet - she thinks, or she copes with the experts.
    3. +1
      3 February 2022 14: 08
      Definitely screamed. wassat
  2. 0
    3 February 2022 11: 29
    Topic from January 21, 2022:
    https://topwar.ru/191405-minoborony-perebrasyvaet-v-belorussiju-zrs-s-400-iz-sostava-obedinenija-vvs-i-pvo-vostochnogo-voennogo-okruga.html
    Everything has already been said... Yes
  3. +1
    3 February 2022 11: 30
    conducting maneuvers "Allied Resolve - 2022", which will last from 10 to 20 February.

    Can the date from February 10 to February 20 be considered the date of the beginning of the liberation of Ukraine from the Bandera and Anglo-Saxon invaders?
    Not?!
    Oh what a pity.... request
    1. +6
      3 February 2022 11: 36
      In Ukraine, half of the population is latent Bandera. Why "release" them? Let's wait until they start killing each other. No need to interfere with them.
      1. +2
        3 February 2022 11: 42
        Quote: Andrey Nikolaevich
        In Ukraine, half of the population is latent Bandera.

        do you propose to wait until the share increases to 90%? Or up to 100%?
        rarely resort to "minus"
        the same case
        1. +1
          3 February 2022 12: 29
          Bandera there are 2/3, and they will start to squabble.
          those for Russia at such a moment simply should not stick out and not show their opinion, and the Bandera offspring will begin to gnaw at each other that he loves Bandera more than his opponent.
          I know that many people think that the revolution of 1917 was a people's revolution, but I will go against them (although I am an ardent Stalinist and Stalin for me is almost the standard of the right person on the "throne").
          remember how in the 20s, when the country was plundered by the "gevolutionary" and there was nothing left to rob, they began to squabble among themselves (which Stalin skillfully used). and there was a situevina one by one with a ruin (yes, the sponsors were all the same as those of the maydaun, read who the relatives of Leiba Bronstein were and where he ate before the revolution, well, why did Putin promise when the hubbad announced that they should be returned their library and the rest, too, what if we raise the topic of a sealed wagon), and there, too, the one who shouted louder that he was for the revolution and how he loves Lenin "won" too.
          everything that will be has already been, just do not stop the abscess from ripening, yes, when the abscess bursts there will be a lot of pus, but this is necessary for the health of the whole organism.
          1. +1
            3 February 2022 12: 37
            Quote: just explo
            Bandera there are 2/3, and they will start to squabble.

            do not trifle
            write 4/5 - paper endure
            1. 0
              3 February 2022 12: 52
              I won’t say for 21 years, but in 19 there was an “independent survey”, in parentheses because it was Western, but generally correct because it was attached to a closed report on mattresses (that is, the static data is correct), so for them 60+% supported maydaun (I don’t remember now 61 or 64 percent) and joining NATO and the EU, 18 percent abstained, the rest believed that maydaun only worsened the state of the ruins.
              1. +1
                3 February 2022 15: 28
                Quote: just explo
                I won’t say for 21 years, but in 19 there was an “independent survey”, in parentheses because it was Western, but generally correct because it was attached to a closed report on mattresses (that is, the static data is correct), so for them 60+% supported Maidaun (now I don’t remember 61 or 64 percent)

                number of respondents?
                survey geography?
                objectivity of the survey?
                link?

                do not play along with those who are trying with all their might to make the people of Ukraine hostile to Russians
                1. 0
                  3 February 2022 16: 36
                  I'll find the link. there was an article about a closed UWB report on the ruin.
                  and the people of the ruins are already hostile to the Russians, this is a fact, and finally take off your rose-colored glasses.
                  1. 0
                    3 February 2022 16: 43
                    Quote: just explo
                    the people of the ruins are already hostile to the Russians, this is a fact and finally take off your rose-colored glasses.

                    don't speak for everyone
                    taking on too much
                    once again boldly emphasize
                    thereby playing along with Bandera and the USA

                    nothing has passed
                    still fixable
                    but you want there to be an abyss between the two peoples

                    do not wait

                    Quote: just explo
                    I'll find the link. there was an article about a closed UWB report

                    or find
                    or admit that your words are not true
                  2. 0
                    4 February 2022 13: 15
                    Quote: just explo
                    I'll find the link.

                    not found yet?
        2. 0
          3 February 2022 16: 25
          You can "run". I propose to wait until they destroy each other, completely.
          1. +1
            3 February 2022 16: 27
            Quote: Andrey Nikolaevich
            You can "run". I propose to wait until they destroy each other, completely.

            30 years just doing what they were waiting for
    2. +1
      3 February 2022 12: 23
      Quote: prior
      Can the date from February 10 to February 20 be considered the date of the beginning of the liberation of Ukraine from the Bandera and Anglo-Saxon invaders?
      Not?!

      The people of Ukraine must expel Bandera themselves (unless, of course, they don’t like Bandera).
  4. -13
    3 February 2022 11: 44
    .. First, we sell our latest systems to the enemies, and then we remove them from one combat duty and drive them to the other side of the country ... A living example. how money obscures the eyes of officials, undermining the defense capability of the state .. Directly far-sighted and sensible policy! ..
    1. +8
      3 February 2022 12: 01
      Quote: Dikson
      Directly far-sighted and sensible policy! ..

      The transfer of military equipment is a standard exercise practice. Even in the USSR.
      1. 0
        3 February 2022 12: 39
        In the USSR, and in a nightmare, it would never have occurred to anyone to sell the latest weapons to a NATO country ..
        1. +2
          3 February 2022 13: 33
          Quote: Dikson
          In the USSR, and in a nightmare, no one would have thought of

          The United States will gladly occupy an empty niche and thank you.
    2. -3
      3 February 2022 12: 02
      Wow .. What, isn't it written in the article? We also drive aircraft back and forth, close the gaps .. The facade was covered - the backside was bare ..)
      1. -1
        3 February 2022 12: 38
        with aviation YET, but even then the situation is much better than 10 years ago, and we already have dozens of S-400 regiments (and yes, I am aware of the size of our country).
    3. +1
      3 February 2022 13: 21
      And how else are you going to practice long-range transfers without the transfers themselves?
  5. +6
    3 February 2022 11: 55
    Just on topic
    1. +2
      3 February 2022 12: 25
      Quote: Vaўkalak

      +1
      Just on topic

      Right on topic.
  6. +1
    3 February 2022 11: 55
    Belarus protested to Ukraine in connection with the illegal crossing of the Belarusian border by a Ukrainian unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), the press service of the Belarusian Foreign Ministry said.

    The Ministry reported that on Thursday the Ukrainian Ambassador to the Republic of Belarus, Igor Kizim, was summoned to the Foreign Ministry, who was strongly protested in connection with purposeful launch unmanned aerial vehicle from Ukraine to the territory of Belarus," TASS reports.

    It's time to start "training" from the Shells as well.
  7. +4
    3 February 2022 12: 09
    I think our S-400s should remain in Belarus, on a rotational basis, as our partners do
    1. +4
      3 February 2022 12: 12
      I agree ... and not all countries need to sell long-range air defense .....
    2. 0
      3 February 2022 12: 21
      Now the dad can agree, but before that he danced .. ours, not only from s400 to Belarus, they don’t mind taking all of Belarus (my opinion), but there used to be a multi-vector policy and more than the West were afraid of Russian oligarchs who at night they didn’t sleep, they wanted to swallow proud independence ... I mean that there alone the dancer is afraid in every possible way (at least he was joking and sabotaging) to get closer to Russia and not everything depends on us ..
  8. +1
    3 February 2022 12: 22
    S-400 to fight including the terrorist threat. Well, soon there will be vigorous loaves too to fight terrorists.
  9. 0
    3 February 2022 14: 17
    Well, that's good, anti-aircraft gunners must work perfectly in different conditions and places, otherwise where will you gain experience if you sit in one place.
  10. 0
    3 February 2022 18: 18
    It is necessary to build AWACS aircraft. AWACS in the air significantly increase the effectiveness of the S-400, expanding the radio horizon at times.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"