Military Review

The need to transform Russian society

154

The formation of modern Russian society took place from the beginning of the 90s against the backdrop of the collapse of the Union, the dominance of the imposed ideology of liberalism and robbery through the privatization of the huge Soviet heritage. All this led to the loss of Soviet ideals and laid the foundation for the formation of a class society.


Natural questions arise: what kind of society was built in Russia and what purpose does it pursue?

Destructive processes of the 90s


In the 90s, instead of the destroyed socialist system, predatory capitalism with a right-wing liberal ideology was formed.

Power was seized by the repainted Soviet nomenklatura, which quickly grew into a comprador big bourgeoisie and contributed to the formation of the petty bourgeoisie in small ways.

Its main task was the destruction of the economic, political and social foundations of socialism, the introduction of private property at all levels and the imposition of liberal values ​​on society with the priority of individualism and an exaggerated incentive for consumerism.

In addition, the task of depriving Russia of sovereignty, surrendering national interests, embedding into Western civilization as a vassal and transferring the powers of government to supranational structures and transnational corporations was solved.

It is well known that no political doctrine can arise and develop in a society if it does not express the interests and aspirations of certain social classes and strata. So in the late USSR, the liberal ideology found serious support in society, since many were seduced by the thrown idea of ​​getting rich quick, and the nomenklatura rapidly converted its power into capital.

The new government, having established control over the information and psychological sphere, took control of the social behavior of people and began to impose perverted values, images and needs on society, and the establishment by the ruling class of control over the economy and law enforcement agencies deprived society of the opportunity to resist the impending catastrophe.

The ideology of the ruling class was bound to become the dominant ideology in the state, and this happened very quickly. The vast majority of the population thoughtlessly rushed to "get rich", destroying the basis of their well-being. The ruling class, in turn, treated the Russian state not as a form of organizing a decent life for people, but as a commercial project aimed at maximizing profits.

“Shock therapy” sobered many, the overwhelming majority simply became impoverished, and those close to power became inexpressibly rich. By the end of the 90s, the society began to see clearly and saw the depravity of the imposed social order.

An attempt by the new government to force everyone to look at the world through the prism of liberal values ​​and forget the Russian civilizational code has failed.

The majority of Russian society did not accept Western liberalism, which was alien to it, rejected the right-wing liberal ideology and was ready to overthrow the hated government.

Political maneuvers of the Russian authorities


Seeing this, the ruling class, in order to avoid losing power, tried to change the paradigm by promoting a new team headed by Putin to the political Olympus, which has already begun to introduce and implement the ideology of liberal conservatism based on defending state national interests, strengthening the role of the state, forming not a comprador, but national bourgeoisie and the revival of state corporations with the possible participation of private and foreign capital.

At the same time, liberal values ​​were not questioned and the compradors were not removed from power, they were simply pushed aside, leaving behind them a financial and economic bloc under pressure from the West.

Such state policy led to a compromise in the 2000s in the Russian political class between two liberal elite groups - pro-Western right-liberal compradors and liberal-conservative "statists".

The statesmen cannot completely get rid of the compradors, this is fraught with an intra-elite conflict that can bring down their power, besides, due to Russia’s serious economic dependence on the West, it cannot allow its proteges to be easily removed from power, who also have some support in society.

In connection with the contradictions in the ruling class, the likelihood of its split and the possibility of conspiracies and coups that can destabilize the situation in the country is growing. It is impossible to reformat the Russian political system without removing from power people who embody the right-liberal social order.

In addition to intra-elite contradictions, contradictions between elites and society are also aggravated, the political system has exhausted itself and has become a brake on the development of the state, it has been frozen and stagnant for more than ten years.

Without reformatting the system and reassessing the fundamental values ​​among the elite and society, the existing contradictions cannot be overcome.

The ruling class does not put forward any new ideas for the development of the state and society, and the country continues to go with the flow under the sails of liberalism despised by the population.

All parliamentary parties enjoy negligible prestige in society and cannot be the locomotive of change. None of them can offer a national idea that unites society, capable of forming a single political, economic and ideological semantic field.

The country today is ruled not by parties, parliament and government, but by deep power in the person of Politburo-2.0, the structure and composition of which have been analyzed in detail by Minchenko Consulting.

Perhaps this is not so bad, at critical moments in the development of the state there should be a single decision-making center, as in republican Rome a dictator was elected for this, and when the situation stabilized, his powers were taken away.

Only this center is absolutely isolated from society today, and how much society influences decision-making and in whose interests they are made can only be assumed.

Necessary basis for the transformation of society


For the successful transformation of Russian society and the reformatting of the political system, it is necessary, first of all, to understand what today's Russian society is like and what is the interest of its constituent classes and estates.

The social structure of society has a complex nature, the classical opposition of classes (according to Marx - the bourgeoisie and the proletariat) today in Russia is not even close, there is no proletariat itself - the social base of the left protest movement.

The monopoly on power and property is the ruling class, represented by the big bourgeoisie in alliance with part of the intellectual aristocracy, the upper middle class, the highest officials and the highest command staff of law enforcement agencies.

The most massive in Russia is the layer of hired workers, the so-called "new proletariat", which includes workers, student youth, the left-wing part of the intelligentsia, the lower and middle parts of the middle class, office workers, law enforcement officers and the petty and middle bourgeoisie adjacent to them.

It should also be noted that a significant part of society has become small proprietors and is imbued with a petty-bourgeois worldview.

Irreconcilable contradictions have developed between the ruling class and the “new proletariat”, which cannot be resolved within the framework of the established political system, since their interests are diametrically opposed.

The situation is aggravated by the fact that in society there is a demand for changes that are artificially hampered, and few people are satisfied with this.

The blatant stratification of the population, the lordly habits of the ruling class, the bureaucracy of state and local officials, the lack of transparency in personnel appointments, corruption and the limited social mobility cause long-accumulating irritation in society, which may one day spill over into mass protests.

Everything will depend on who will be the first to intercept this process by slipping their program and their values ​​on the masses.

Within the framework of such a complex Russian society, the transition from the liberal-conservative model to the “left turn” is a utopia; there is neither a social base nor driving forces for this. The class instinct of the liberals and the big bourgeoisie will never allow this. And it is not just that the Communist Party of the Russian Federation is losing authority and influence, it does not have mass support in society, its base is old people and leftists. Without the support of the authorities, it would have gone into oblivion long ago.

From the liberal-conservative model of Russia, the path must go through the national liberation struggle from the economic and ideological influence of the West to the transitional right-wing conservative social model, taking into account the interests of the national bourgeoisie and other sections of society, with an unconditional strengthening of the role of the state, and only then can we talk about a possible left turn .

With the preservation of today's liberal-conservative model, the country will face the class dictatorship of the big bourgeoisie with all its "charms".

Reformatting the system is possible only if there is a critical mass of the population and a political vanguard with the appropriate motivation, interests and values. That is, for this it is necessary: ​​the national idea that has taken possession of the masses, the social base and the driving forces of transformations.

The social base in today's Russian society can only be the most massive and heterogeneous layer of hired workers and their allies in the face of the petty and middle bourgeoisie. Their interests and views diverge quite seriously, and it is not so easy to work out a unifying political platform.

The driving force should be a political movement, which does not exist and has yet to be created.

This path presupposes revolutionary transformations from below with rather vague prospects and results.

Strange as it may seem, a part of the patriotic elite, which decided to lead the national liberation movement from the dictatorship of the West towards the left-conservative model of society, can also become the driving force.

This way of revolutionary transformations from above is more viable, since the state is in the hands of such a powerful instrument of transformations, and its use will be decisive in many respects.

In this regard, the pressure on the patriotic elite should only intensify in order to stimulate the transition processes to more unifying actions.

To implement the transformations according to the first and second options, a coalition of political forces is needed, united by a common goal on the basis of a political platform capable of capturing and expressing the urgent moods in society. These forces will have to intercept the agenda from the authorities and form their own.

The most problematic task is the formation of an image of the future, for the sake of which the elite, employees and part of the national bourgeoisie will be ready to unite.

With all the existing contradictions between them, the task of ensuring a high level and quality of life in society is unlikely to cause serious disagreements. But for a Russian person this is not enough, he has one more indisputable traditional value - sovereignty, characterized by the desire for independence, self-sufficiency and originality, providing the people with life according to their own laws, and not imposed from outside.

A Russian person is by nature passionate and competitive, and he is unlikely to allow himself to be an apprentice to the liberal West, which looks at Russia as its periphery, it is not in its rules.

The idea of ​​protecting the sovereignty of the Fatherland from the encroachments of foreigners has always united Russians, and now, when the West has declared a war of annihilation on us for our disobedience, this will even more stimulate the process of unity of society.

All this suggests that in Russian society there is a social basis for its reformatting, so far there are no driving forces, but on the wave of demand for changes, they will inevitably form. There is no main thing - the idea of ​​a competitive model of society that unites everyone, and the main task of Russian intellectuals is to formulate it and introduce it to the masses.
Author:
154 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 28 January 2022 15: 11
    +11
    And who are the unifiers of the Russian people. Who are the Russian intellectuals?
    1. yuriy55
      yuriy55 28 January 2022 15: 20
      +18
      The need to transform Russian society

      Leave these theses. Let's make the implementation of the law mandatory for everyone, introduce a progressive personal income tax scale and lift the moratorium on the death penalty for certain categories of crimes.
      1. 210ox
        210ox 28 January 2022 16: 27
        +18
        The author is an incorrigible idealist... However, the theses are correct. But unworkable
      2. olimpiada15
        olimpiada15 28 January 2022 20: 02
        +1
        Yes, not just introduce a progressive scale, but enter a single one. Persons with incomes above a certain level receive reduced taxes, while the rest pay the same tax, with the same tax being taken from any income, even less than the level of survival. Thus, excess income is not taxed.
        1. AAK
          AAK 28 January 2022 23: 52
          +5
          Colleague, I think it is more correct to differentiate the size of the tax rate not so much from turnover / profit, but from the type of activity (the maximum - banks, etc., then - the export of raw materials, and then, the minimum rates for manufacturers of science-intensive products, energy, etc. ., professionals can easily make such a differentiation).
      3. Sergey BM
        Sergey BM 29 January 2022 15: 00
        0
        Let's make the law obligatory for all
        What stupid thing?
        Russian laws are not designed to be enforced, they were not written for that.
        And they are written.
        At least try to cover up the purchase of vaccination certificates - there will be a riot.
        The simplest example.
        No - the laws have never been enforced in Russia and will never be enforced.
        What would not carry a variety of provocateurs.
    2. Snail N9
      Snail N9 28 January 2022 15: 24
      +59
      We do not have any liberal-conservative model of society and statehood. This is a specially replicated myth. A comprador kleptocracy has been built in the country, former scammers, bandits and their protectors from law enforcement agencies who seized power in the country on the foundation of the notorious "vertical of power". There are a lot of videos on YouTube about how this happened and about each powerful character and their relationships. This kleptocracy is now transforming into a caste society based on digital control and management.
    3. mag nit
      mag nit 28 January 2022 15: 29
      +25
      How is who? Crooks from United Russia.
    4. place
      place 28 January 2022 15: 40
      +16
      Quote: tralflot1832
      And who are the unifiers of the Russian people. Who are the Russian intellectuals?

      And who do the Russian people call the word "authorities"? Here they are the combiners. And here the intellectuals are completely incomprehensible.
      Since the time of the USSR, intellectuals have been miserable beggars ... they also learned the price for themselves only when they got the opportunity to fade to the West. And hundreds of thousands flowed there. There is nothing for intellectuals to do here!

      There was such a popular Western computer game "Kingdom" in the 90s. So in this game, if the King allows a decrease in the living standards of the people, a popular uprising immediately begins and the King is overthrown. We have the opposite, as in the poems of the poet Nekrasov;
      "People of serfdom
      Real dogs sometimes
      the heavier the punishment
      That is how dear they are, gentlemen. "
      1. user
        user 28 January 2022 16: 11
        +4
        And who do the Russian people call the word "authorities"?


        I just read the reviews, but after reading your quote, it even became interesting.
        And who is your authority?
        And what kind of people and when did they call them that?

        There are just a million options. . .
      2. Mikhail Sidorov
        Mikhail Sidorov 28 January 2022 17: 14
        -8
        Since the time of the USSR, intellectuals have been miserable beggars ... they also learned the price for themselves only when they got the opportunity to fade to the West. And hundreds of thousands flowed there.

        Who are they? Name at least three.
    5. bandabas
      bandabas 28 January 2022 15: 43
      +25
      Those who "have no money, but you hold on." By the way, I still can’t understand what the person who voiced this phrase is doing in power, but he receives loot regularly. I don't answer for anything.
      1. faiver
        faiver 28 January 2022 18: 38
        +11
        By the way, I still can’t understand what the person in power is doing
        - this person receives such a "pension" for warming the chair for 4 years and being devoted to his master ....
      2. IVANOV-GDLYAN
        IVANOV-GDLYAN 29 January 2022 20: 11
        +3
        Have you heard the 90s song "American Boy, American Joy..."? So: your favorite song of your "face".
    6. Mikhail Sidorov
      Mikhail Sidorov 28 January 2022 16: 40
      -8
      And who are the unifiers of the Russian people. Who are the Russian intellectuals?

      Alexander Prokhanov, Zakhar Prilepin, etc.
      1. Sergey BM
        Sergey BM 29 January 2022 15: 01
        +2
        And what are these peppers?
    7. boni592807
      boni592807 30 January 2022 23: 23
      0
      tralflot1832 (Andrey S.), January 28, 2022 15:11, NEW "... And who are the unifiers of the Russian people. Who are the Russian intellectuals?..."

      If you feel good, then there is no need for THEM (intellectuals). belay
      А if there are problems, then look around, there are media and VO who have not forgotten how to think, there is enough in the economy and other areas. And wow, more historical EXPERIENCE than other exits from J. Well, in extreme cases, to the mirror that there is no "circle of questions and friends" !? wink
      Yes, and the servicemen have enough experience, it was not in vain that they said (-ryat) - "The Army is a school of LIFE." repeat
      What a habit, not only to believe that Russia is "a country of orphans and the poor."
      But it is also joyful to quote - "There are no prophets in their Fatherland."
      crying
      Let for example, the organizers of VO will start voting on issues for example - What kind of state would you like - social, "democratic", as in the USA, another.
      Citizens (citizenship) in Russia - to everyone, only to the indigenous peoples of the current Russian Federation (for min. questions - there are according to history: by nationality - русские: Great Russians, Belarusians, New Russians, Little Russians (oh, krains, don't worry, it's not about you).
      According to the motherland of residence and origin - RUSSIAN - Tatars, Bashkirs, Chechens.and all the INDIGENOUS of today's Russia, ... Russians (a tautology, but we divide by the homeland and the place of indigenous residence of the people). The rest, how? repeat On business, yes it will be rewarded! How many without "official" guests with a Russian passport, and how many not even taken into account, only the media, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the FSB and "prospects" taking into account the events in Kazakhstan. bully
      That. First, decide on the range of issues, then with priorities. wink
      And, hedgehog WHAT!?
      First of all, "Big Brother" sees everything.
      Second, remember, not at night the mentioned TV program (USSR) - "If I WAS (President .., organizer, etc.) -
      The old wisdom says: "Fear not those who SPEAK. Fear those who are silent." And "It's not HARMFUL to dream, it's HARMFUL not to DREAM". repeat
      R.S. I remember in my childhood jokes about "... small groups of 1,5 ml each and one tank in the middle ..", "China exports - towels and thermos ..". What, now it’s not funny, after sparrows and a domain in every yard ..?. And China dreamed and ... what NOW ...!? This is about the fact that "Who wants, he is looking for opportunities, who is NOT! He is looking for excuses ....
      It would not be time for Russia ..... for example, that we can’t cope without guests? Even under the USSR, it was first mechanization, then automation and ... on Gorbi and .......
      etc. hi
      R.S. A funny question - "Do we have a CHOICE!? In addition to searching for opportunities ...!
      Here are the "Partners" around the perimeter, so he can "wipe himself" and start to repent wassat
      1. boni592807
        boni592807 1 February 2022 20: 40
        0
        Returning to the article.
        "The need to transform Russian society"

        Let's take a few quotes from the author as a basis: what

        - "..The formation of modern Russian society took place from the beginning of the 90s against the backdrop of the collapse of the Union, domination of the imposed ideology of liberalism and robbery through privatization huge Soviet heritage. Everything this led to the loss Soviet ideals and laid the foundations for the formation of a class society ... "-
        If everything is correct with the first part on ... "the dominance of the imposed ideology of liberalism and robbery through privatization .." pressed, but since "work is underway" зreads NOT ALL YET... hi "cleaned out" the 5th and partners, for VO, an example of wars is Chechnya (about the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation) and Syria ..., yes, "everyday life" is not forgotten ... It would be according to THEIR, if there would be EVERYTHING !!.. . belay

        "... So in the late USSR, liberal ideology found serious support in society, repeat since many were seduced by the thrown idea of ​​getting rich quick, and the nomenklatura rapidly converted its power into capital bully ....." - Usually, who knows where the ship will really sail, he gets the MAXIMUM benefit. We look at who and how much% received from the "Soviet pie" (at the place of "work activity", in proximity to SU and Insider information (useful information), related and national lines and parallels ... etc. .); bully

        - "..setting control over the information and psychological sphere, took control social behavior of people and began to impose on society ... "- this is understandable, NABOUT WE WILL ANSWER YOURSELF пwhy is it MINIMIZED for max number of defined nations, social groups, even if you look closely - states in the same European Union and NATO (the definition of the state-va - France for% of incoming information, music - only French) NATIONAL - indigenous)?

        - "...public policy led to compromise in the 2000s in the Russian political class two liberal elite groups - pro-Western right-liberal compradors and liberal-conservative "statists ...".
        Probably, this IS a "crossroads" by NECESSITY (the distribution of forces and means and the "wish of the masses" ...) we read the bygone classics .... -Further, the QUESTION is to whom WHERE and, most importantly, WHY? repeat

        Someone might wonder, no - not Chernyshevsky (Who is to blame. And WHAT TO DO!..A Dostoevsky ( beloved not only in the West) - " And, am I trembling or have the right ... "
        It is clear that REST into the PRESENT from ECONOMY to ... incl. with our "unforgettable, sorry to the PAIN of constant (including in history) "PARTNERS". With zeal, shouting WAR, war ...! Yes, and she is not particularly afraid of the War, because "House on the Hill": nah-Xia on the island, and from the lackeys, the lackeys ENOUGH to launch forward.
        USA is sure that a "VICTORIOUS" war, in the worst case, the transition to a "vapor state" of lackeys and AT LEAST almost ALL of its partners not a big price for the ability to steer further. Weaken the Russian Federation, "throw off" - "burn" Fin DEBT in the war. Acceptable losses for the USA ... t.s. "minor losses from FRIENDLY fire ..." bully

        According to the situation, the question - WHERE we are going for the Russian Federation is determined by the RIGID situation. bully
        - One group of so-called. ELITE - USA in The face of "Madame" Clinton was said after she watched the plot of the death of Gaddafi ... HARD and without sentimentality. am
        - Another was appreciated by the departed "real FRIEND" of Russia - Brzezinski, who asked a question about the oligarchs of the Russian Federation. No.
        - There was still ONE "standing" on the sidelines, if NOT the beneficiary, then toas a MINIMUM vitally interested in the fate of Russia (RF) - ITS indigenous people belay (see the list of indigenous people according to the atlas of the Russian Federation).
        What HE wants :
        - "bright brotherhood of the Turks" under the "caring hand" of Turkey. History helps...
        - "Brothers" who came to "help" and at the same time earn a LIFE. But is it worth changing for an adobe house and a donkey (for the bulk of the "brothers"), your "terrible" Russian Federation - where you have your own national apartment and a little bit more (and in Turkey or among other "brothers" this is provided to small peoples. ..).
        - there is another part of the indigenous people - 75% min, well, PEOPLE - "Look at you," said one to the other, "what a wheel! What do you think, would that wheel make it if it happened to Moscow, or would it not make it?" "He'll get there," answered the other. "But I don't think he'll make it to Kazan?" "He won't get to Kazan," answered another. - - This conversation ended. Dead Souls. N. V. Gogol.

        - Yes and social issue "not forgotten"( "heavy torment" in the USSR with his - "Everything is in the name, everything is for the good .... whom, haven't you forgotten !?") repeat "Thank you, Gorby "helped get rid of THIS" and received the US Senate medal. bully

        One of the classmates - colleagues (Ukrainian), once said to the question: "What should I do?" "... Fool I THINK richer ..".
        So where will the "wheel" of the Russian Federation go and how? what

        old joke, about how a citizen who got into a train car at the Moscow railway station, in a "seriously joyful" state, having learned from his neighbors that the train was going to Moscow, was delighted: "... What technology has come to, you are in Moscow, and I am in Peter and ALL are traveling in the ONE train and car..." won't roll anymore. hi

        R.S. Not for ... and not against .... For Russia, relatives, for us and you .. hi
        Good luck and health.
  2. Dizel200
    Dizel200 28 January 2022 15: 18
    -3
    Interesting article.
  3. Cosmemedic
    Cosmemedic 28 January 2022 15: 21
    +8
    Support for small businesses engaged in manufacturing, rather than trade, should be a priority. At the moment Completely insufficient and has no advantages over other types of business.
    1. tralflot1832
      tralflot1832 28 January 2022 15: 25
      -3
      I completely agree with the support of manufacturers. There is no money for decent development, there are a lot of plans. I judge by my company, where I sometimes work part-time.
      1. paul3390
        paul3390 28 January 2022 15: 50
        +23
        The problem is not that you don't have money - the problem is that people don't have it. What kind of production can there be with a poor population - who will buy something produced? And no one will let us into foreign markets - everything has been divided there a long time ago ..
        1. Lannan Shi
          Lannan Shi 28 January 2022 17: 10
          +13
          Quote: paul3390
          And no one will let us into foreign markets - everything has been divided there a long time ago.

          Em. And who let the Germans at them first, then the Japanese. a little later than the Koreans, followed by the Chinese? And then they were "everything was divided there a long time ago." Or, before the advent of Toyota, people traveled exclusively on foot, and before the construction of light industry by China, they walked with a bare bottom?
          Quote: paul3390
          What kind of production can there be with a poor population - who will buy something produced?

          But here yes. Who will buy Russian cars or jeans if the Russians themselves disdain them. yes
          1. paul3390
            paul3390 28 January 2022 18: 21
            +5
            And who let the Germans at them first, then the Japanese. a little behind the Koreans

            It is known who let it in - the USA is well .. Why - also not Newton's binomial, to confront the USSR. It was too expensive for some mattresses to butt, so they had to raise allies .. In the same Japan - the loot poured in exactly after the start of the Korean War ..
            1. Lannan Shi
              Lannan Shi 28 January 2022 20: 16
              +5
              Quote: paul3390
              It is known who let it in - the USA is well ..

              Apply with great reserve. Exclusively to Germany.
              Quote: paul3390
              In the same Japan - the loot poured in exactly after the start of the Korean War.

              The loot gushed there solely because Japan is a drop closer to Korea than California. delivery shoulder. Yeah.
              Quote: paul3390
              so I had to raise allies ..

              Well, the automobile trade war. with the same Japan, for example, or wooden with Canada, well, or chicken with Germany, these are elements of strengthening allies laughing
              I'm sorry, but this is all nonsense. It is in the interests of the United States to concentrate 100% of the industrial capacities of the market. Then the allies, in principle, will not be needed. But the interests of US corporations lie in a somewhat different plane. And if "everything was divided there a long time ago" ... This only speaks about it. That either hands grow from the priests, or that same butt on the shoulders, instead of the head. But this is a question of the reproduction of elites, but not of production with trade. Look at the same Korea and the Philippines. The interests and presence of the United States in the latter were more powerful, as were the resources. And infrastructure. But the former had a pak chon x=y, while the latter had only a gang of self-satisfied monkeys. The result is there. The first export equipment, the second servants.
              PS
              The states cannot control the arms market either. Even in NATO, which they rule. And you're talking about socks, vacuum cleaners and chips. Ches word, naive.
        2. tralflot1832
          tralflot1832 28 January 2022 17: 57
          -3
          I’m talking about the company where I work part-time. The creed of the management is that the work of specialists should be well paid. From a good contract, in addition to salaries, then there are continuous minuses for organizational issues and I’m not talking about kickbacks. There is only money left to enter a new tender without attracting loans. no.
        3. Vadim237
          Vadim237 28 January 2022 18: 41
          -14
          However, export deliveries are allowed to grow, and about the poor population in the country, there are really poor 400000 people, the remaining 20 million poor categories calculated by tax reports that employers provide, and so on deposit accounts with the population 97 billion in foreign currency and 38 trillion in rubles + 700000 accounts abroad in the amount of 13 trillion in ruble terms.
        4. Curt
          Curt 28 January 2022 21: 26
          +2
          Loans Comrade! under 20% per annum)
        5. ivan2022
          ivan2022 29 January 2022 09: 45
          +3
          Quote: paul3390
          The problem is that people don't have them.

          The problem is that there is enough money in the country, but the mind of the people is not enough. People with their constant "approval" cannot achieve anything under any power. The nation is quite at the level of Latinos ...........
          They don’t have any real trade unions, they don’t really support any political party (they always have one argument; “these don’t do anything for us”, and why the hell is a good gentleman obliged to do for you?), but, moreover, they always rely on the current "barina". THIS IS GENERALLY A CIRCUS WITH HORSES.
          They all blew it, and they lost their workers’ party and the country, and now their bad bosses are at stake ..... what to be, it cannot be avoided, and deservedly so!
          1. Sergey BM
            Sergey BM 29 January 2022 15: 04
            0
            The nation is quite at the level of Latinos
            I totally agree.
            Don't wait until the current generation is dead.
      2. seacap
        seacap 28 January 2022 17: 36
        +4
        There is a lot of money, they are dead weight, why, all questions are for a diligent student of Yale training, part-time head of the Central Bank
        1. Spring fluff
          Spring fluff 28 January 2022 18: 19
          +6
          you are right about the money, but you are wrong about the address. we have a fairly strong propaganda about the responsibility of the Central Bank for the lack of economic development. this is a trick to divert the attention of the population (that part of it that is at least somehow interested in why the economy is developing so badly).
          In reality (including directly under the Law, under Federal No. 86 fz), the Central Bank is not responsible for the development of the economy. Therefore, which is logical, the Central Bank has neither departments nor people responsible for the development of the economy (and how can one recruit people in a state structure, create a department and start turning something back (including creating some kind of regulatory acts), if, according to the law, this state structure cannot deal with this issue). The government is responsible for this. The government can throw money into the economy just like the Central Bank, they each have their own tools and reserves for this. But to explain to the population why the government (with the Ministry of Economic Development, with relevant ministries, etc.) does not give money and will not develop the economy is difficult, they will not believe it. This is where this trick was born - that the economy should supposedly be developed by the Central Bank, but does not develop because they are independent (unusually, maybe they are not state? :) henchmen of the West / IMF / ...
          1. seacap
            seacap 28 January 2022 18: 30
            -3
            That's right, according to the letter of the law, the Central Bank is only responsible for the stability of its currency, and the Ministry of Finance is responsible for investments. Only here there is a small trick, with big consequences. The Central Bank is guided not only by the laws of the country (and we practically do not have such), or rather, not so much as it prioritizes "recommendations" and instructions from the IMF, and this is the so-called. "the notorious budget rule", control and management of financial flows, the regulator of the banking system and various funds and reserves, in particular gold and foreign exchange, etc. and so on, and much more, indirectly sets the principles and conditions for investment, it turns out, under external control, it manages the banking and financial system, and hence the economy as a whole.
            1. Spring fluff
              Spring fluff 28 January 2022 18: 38
              +6
              so, I understood :) the familiar words of the training manual about the Central Bank, I even guessed about the IMF in advance :) so they would immediately say that at work, during execution and besides the Central Bank, there is no one to answer, period :)
              about the laws - we have their wagon and a small cart. if you don't know something, ask. tell you about the budget rule with the laws? who accepted it, signed it, what is the procedure for adopting laws in general in our country (the thought (who is in the majority there?) is the federation president (the constitution was recently changed as it should) and nothing else)?
              or sincerely believe? if I sincerely suggest that you look not like in a joke under a lantern, but start from the beginning, i.e. from the Government and the Duma. and here, lo and behold, you will see both the names of departments and positions that should be responsible for the economy, and tools in the form of the ability to pass laws (unlike the Central Bank), in particular on the budget and taxes, etc. etc.

              and if you want to continue about the responsibility of the Central Bank, then we can discuss the procedure for appointing the head of the Central Bank. Let me remind you - according to the same 86-FZ:
              Article 14. The Chairman of the Bank of Russia is appointed by the State Duma for a term of five years by a majority of votes of the total number of deputies of the State Duma.
              A candidate for appointment to the position of Governor of the Bank of Russia shall be submitted by the President of the Russian Federation no later than three months before the expiration of the powers of the current Chairman of the Bank of Russia.
              86-FZ, as you understand, was proposed by the same Duma, approved by the Federation Council and signed by the president.
              this is what comes out - all these worthy people specially appointed the wrong person to manage the most important state body? it's scary to imagine ... but who are they themselves then, for whom are they?
              1. seacap
                seacap 28 January 2022 20: 29
                -2
                Everything is clear, I agree, but what does work and manuals have to do with it?
        2. Vadim237
          Vadim237 28 January 2022 18: 43
          -11
          Money is not a dead weight; everything is in circulation.
    2. Spring fluff
      Spring fluff 28 January 2022 16: 24
      +7
      :) The topic of supporting small businesses (and any other topics about distributing money and power to someone else) fundamentally contradicts the task of a successfully functioning system in our country.
      1. Sergey BM
        Sergey BM 29 January 2022 15: 07
        +2
        Small business ass
        Park Chung Hee did not develop a small business, but a normal production
    3. Doccor18
      Doccor18 28 January 2022 16: 41
      +18
      Quote: Cosmemedic
      Supporting small businesses engaged in manufacturing rather than trading should be a priority...

      The business that a person started, despite all the obstacles and difficulties, requires certain qualities. He is a man of great intelligence and courage. If you give the "green light" to this phenomenon, then it will certainly flourish and become widespread. And now the most important question. Why do those in power need millions of smart and courageous people who understand the law, have a good income and feel free and self-sufficient? For some, it's all like a "bone in the throat" ... Therefore, all help and privileges are for beautiful legends, but the reality is the opposite, this phenomenon will never bloom, the flowers are painfully bright, the aroma hits the head ...
  4. paul3390
    paul3390 28 January 2022 15: 27
    +7
    A statesman in Russia, by definition, should be a supporter of the immediate return of Soviet power .. For 30 years of banishing the bourgeoisie clearly showed that these, uh, representatives of the LGBT will completely ruin both the country and us orphans ..
    1. Plate
      Plate 28 January 2022 15: 37
      +3
      A statesman in Russia, by definition, must be a supporter of the immediate return of Soviet power.

      Just like that without any alternative, without any pluralism of opinions?
      1. paul3390
        paul3390 28 January 2022 15: 48
        +5
        We have been admiring the alternative for 30 years already - what the hell is pluralism here .. And so everything is very clear ..
        1. Plate
          Plate 29 January 2022 12: 47
          -2
          And they admired Soviet power for more than 70 years. Didn't like it either, got rid of it.
          Why get so hung up? Neither the third nor the fourth exist and cannot exist? It seems to me that, if you think about it, there are not only the third and fourth, but also the fifth, sixth and seventh.
          Soviet power did not fit. Neoliberal capitalism (it seems that it was in the 90s) also did not fit. The government did not fit. So what's the point of choosing (or imposing a choice?) from what no longer fits and has been discarded?
      2. Lannan Shi
        Lannan Shi 28 January 2022 17: 15
        +12
        Quote: Plate
        Just like that without any alternative, without any pluralism of opinions?

        No, why is there no alternative? Last year minus a million people. There are still 145 left. A century and a half can be alternative. Then a bunch of remaining savages living on the Finnish-Chinese border will discuss pluralism. yes
        1. Sergey BM
          Sergey BM 29 January 2022 15: 10
          -3
          Minus much more
          Million it with migration
          Here she keeps us afloat and I hope it will continue
    2. Doccor18
      Doccor18 28 January 2022 17: 09
      +6
      Quote: paul3390
      for sure they will ruin both the country and us orphans ..

      The country will not be destroyed. As long as there is something to mine and sell across the border, they need a country. But the "orphans" on the side. We will, we won't, it doesn't matter. The only important thing is that the property stays longer in the same hands/families/clans. The fact that development has slowed down or even stopped somewhere is also not important, imports will take it out ...
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 28 January 2022 18: 56
        -11
        Imports will take out - of course they will take out at least what you create and build inside the country in an open market economy consumers - customers themselves choose what how much and from whom to buy, and manufacturers decide where to deliver their products for domestic or export, as well as the owners of all kinds of shops and Internet sites themselves decide what to sell based on the purchase price of goods in order to make a profit.
    3. Vadim237
      Vadim237 28 January 2022 18: 46
      -14
      The Finnish version of capitalism and the development of Russia is seen as a much higher priority than the Soviet one, thanks to which we are reaping the current fruits of its collapse.
      1. paul3390
        paul3390 28 January 2022 18: 55
        +4
        Scandinavian variants of capitalism are possible only in small countries with a small population .. When everything and everything is in sight .. And even then - mark my words, and grace will soon end there ..
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 29 January 2022 11: 58
          -4
          It is quite realistic to implement it by regions in each of the 85 regions in Russia, but this requires a lot of money and the work of local authorities and the active participation of the population.
        2. Sergey BM
          Sergey BM 29 January 2022 15: 11
          -1
          Scandinavian variants of capitalism are possible only in small countries with small populations
          Is that a problem?
          Let's share.
          Talk about that everywhere, not only in Khabarovsk ...
      2. victor50
        victor50 29 January 2022 08: 41
        +6
        Quote: Vadim237
        The Finnish version of capitalism and the development of Russia is seen as a much higher priority than the Soviet one, thanks to which we are reaping the current fruits of its collapse.

        And what else can the current system, besides reap? We are already reaping half the time of the existence of socialism, and all of it - socialism - is to blame for all the failures. The Mongol-Tatar yoke is to blame, and even the baptism of Russia.
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 29 January 2022 12: 02
          -5
          The USSR is to blame for the fact that it did not create competitively capable civilian products, did not promote brands around the world and did not occupy the market - as they did in the West, and now this is a rather costly and complex process with maximum risks, but the results are not great, but still.
          1. Plate
            Plate 29 January 2022 12: 57
            -4
            Yes, in established markets, you can no longer try to unwind, if not by titanic efforts. The same MS-21, even if it is a hundred times better than the best Boeings and Airbuses, will not be able to fully enter the world market if we promote it honestly. Here only put a gun to the temple: "Certify our plane!" Or supply it to the domestic market and closest friends purely to support the aviation industry, so that in which case it could quickly rivet fighters, bombers and BT aircraft. The same for other industries.
            Here it’s just to get involved in something new and actively push, or in some initially constantly changing industry (most likely, the development of certain software products (and even then, based on long-recognized libraries, languages ​​and operating systems, otherwise again without a market): antiviruses, games, editors, etc.).
            But no matter what we decide to do and no matter how well we do it (and we will do it if we want), we need appropriate advertisers, marketers ... "Traders", in short :) And here, for some reason, we each when problems arise.
            1. victor50
              victor50 29 January 2022 14: 43
              +3
              Quote: Plate
              But no matter what we decide to do and no matter how well we do it (and we will do it if we want), we need appropriate advertisers, marketers ... "Traders", in short :) And here, for some reason, we each when problems arise.

              And you say that we have created such an outstanding thing that it didn’t “go” only through the fault of advertisers, traders, etc.? These or those who want to be them, it seems to me, are a multiple overproduction, but, alas, we can no longer produce products. And the success of advertising, first of all, depends on the product, its uniqueness, usefulness, price, etc.
  5. Sauron80
    Sauron80 28 January 2022 15: 33
    +24
    The phrase about the "new government" after the 90s jarred - I didn’t even read further. Where is it new? All the same nomenclature from the Union, it’s just that some figures displaced others from the feeder under a promise not to imprison. ALL!!! There were no more changes in power! As there was a cult of personal enrichment, it continues. As people went into power for the sake of dough, so it continues.
    1. Spring fluff
      Spring fluff 28 January 2022 16: 29
      +1
      Well, not really :) the mask of ideology has been discarded. its maintenance was very expensive, but tactically it did not bring any benefit. new social elevators also appeared - business (albeit not always honest), show business in various forms, some kind of political opposition. And I see significant advantages in this. Yes, they are still ugly, but this is already a movement from the Soviet autocracy to an enlightened monarchy, the beginnings of feudalism, and there you see bourgeois transformations in a history textbook, and then catch up with the whole world along the high road of democracy-capitalism.
      1. Spring fluff
        Spring fluff 28 January 2022 16: 43
        -2
        I will explain my idea. even if there are no cardinal changes (Kazakhstan just recently kicked off), then gradually the children-grandchildren of the current elite will multiply, the inheritance in the form of power and money will be distributed among a wide range of not so closely connected people, there will be internal conflicts in the elite (now they are restrained, but this is not forever), someone will quarrel with someone else at school, someone will break up in business, etc. Gradually, there will be many such conflicting parties, and all of them are correct in terms of concepts. and when it is not clear which of these noble dons and worthy descendants is more right, then they will decide according to the normative. and they will go to resolve their conflicts no longer according to concepts, but through the courts and appeal to the law. and each will support judgment against his opponent with his own resources. so the role will gradually increase and the work of the courts will be adjusted, the laws will be polished. and at the same time, all this will gradually spill out into different media, and if something does not spill out, then worthy descendants will create new media with their resources to strengthen their position. and so will gradually appear "independent" media. also, gradually the native population (from which the idols in the form of ideology were finally taken away) will gradually begin to be convinced of the power of science (finally they will understand that it is usually about money, and not about lightning from the sky) and will increase their knowledge of finance and jurisprudence. and there you see already a competent civil society and forward together with the world community.
        1. soul
          soul 28 January 2022 17: 54
          +9
          You mean - to go through the path of evolution, which the West has done before. Too long, something might happen along the way.
          1. Spring fluff
            Spring fluff 28 January 2022 18: 08
            -6
            In theory, yes. In practice, now all processes have greatly accelerated due to the high availability of information, population mobility, etc. The borders are open, young people, especially those associated with IT, actively travel and migrate if they wish, they will be the conductors of information about the world for their relatives and friends. National borders are blurring, Europe has already united in fact. Culture is also becoming global. Religious denominations are no longer a reason to divide people, with a few exceptions. So I think the process of transforming our society into a kind of European-oriented one will not take much time.
            1. Aag
              Aag 28 January 2022 19: 49
              +8
              By then it will no longer be Russia.
            2. victor50
              victor50 29 January 2022 08: 44
              +5
              Quote: Spring Fluff
              In practice, now all processes have greatly accelerated due to the high availability of information, population mobility, etc. The borders are open, young people, especially those associated with IT, actively travel and migrate if they wish, they will be the conductors of information about the world for their relatives and friends. National borders are blurring

              Well, where are the positive results of this acceleration?! Or is this bright future still ahead of us?
  6. Daniil Konovalenko
    Daniil Konovalenko 28 January 2022 15: 52
    +4
    The idea of ​​protecting the sovereignty of the Fatherland from the encroachments of foreigners has always united Russians, and now, when the West has declared a war of annihilation on us for our disobedience, this will even more stimulate the process of unity of society.
    This is where we had to start. And then the "new proletariat", intercept the agenda from the authorities and so on ... Shaw, how can we rally with part of the patriotic elite who decided to lead the national liberation movement from the dictatorship of the West .. laughing Three types of articles are published on the site, which could not have been published, but they are published, those that do not burn and those that do not sink ...
  7. Proton
    Proton 28 January 2022 15: 52
    +7
    Author!
    Be careful!
    There are some names that should not be mentioned!!!
    You can scold Gref, Naibulina, Chubais, Medvedev, General Taburetkin, cosmonaut Rogozin and others like them. Do not encroach on the sacred. laughing
  8. ee2100
    ee2100 28 January 2022 15: 55
    +3
    Another utopian and whiny article. There is no special Russian way, but naturally it unites ideas. Forget!
    All people all over the world are the same. Lenin defined this studio for the development of society as imperialism, so we have achieved it. And now we will flounder here together with the whole world. You won't be allowed to die of hunger. The methods of governing the people have been worked out and they are known.
    Let's assume that the author let off steam.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 28 January 2022 18: 59
      -6
      "All people all over the world are the same" - In what ways are they the same?
      1. ee2100
        ee2100 28 January 2022 19: 08
        +3
        Equal in wants and needs
      2. alone
        alone 28 January 2022 21: 24
        +4
        Quote: Vadim237

        "All people all over the world are the same" - In what ways are they the same?

        The fact that they all die sooner or later, and they won’t take anything with them to another world
  9. Keyser soze
    Keyser soze 28 January 2022 15: 56
    +2
    Tatra will shoot you all, under a hot hand ... laughing
    And the author will be fucked for Trotskyism ... bully
    1. paul3390
      paul3390 28 January 2022 21: 39
      +5
      Well, it’s unlikely for Trotskyism .. For what happened to the USSR clearly shows that Comrade Trotsky was right in his predictions .. But - Comrade Stalin was also right !! But how to cross between these two rightness is a separate, difficult question ..
  10. Ryaruav
    Ryaruav 28 January 2022 15: 58
    +7
    In 1917 they took power because the people had weapons in their hands, the army was essentially a people’s army and it only remained to direct it correctly, and now we see a divided society and security forces (there were no strikes even against the pension reform)
    1. seacap
      seacap 28 January 2022 17: 32
      +6
      So the main task of appointing Serdyukov to the Ministry of Defense was the destruction of the Soviet heritage and traditions of the Russian army, to replace the old command staff, faithful to the oath, to plant the spirit of mercenarism and philistinism.
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 28 January 2022 19: 02
        -13
        No more left-wing experiments in our country will be enough for experimenting.
        1. paul3390
          paul3390 28 January 2022 21: 41
          +5
          You might think - someone will ask you .. You can’t argue against the laws of the development of society. Come on - the unfinished feudal lords squealed in the same way, say, in France after Napoleon - enough of our experiments with these bourgeois, never again! Feudalism is eternal. Gee...
          1. Vadim237
            Vadim237 29 January 2022 11: 28
            -8
            Society will develop, but not along the left path. Feudalism is the same capitalism, only a changed eternal formula - producer - commodity - money - consumer has not disappeared anywhere, like the desire of everyone to live better and private property has existed and will always exist as only the strong will be considered and respected.
  11. sergeant87
    sergeant87 28 January 2022 16: 10
    +3
    Thanks to the author for the article. There is no alternative to the left turn in the development of Russia. The last juices are being squeezed out of the great heritage of the Soviet Union. Soon the consumer society will finish off the last living and real thing that is left.
  12. Ros 56
    Ros 56 28 January 2022 16: 11
    +5
    The need to transform Russian society

    This idea has long matured, soon it will be covered with moss. And you need to start from school, if not from kindergarten, or rather from teachers.
    1. Mikhail Sidorov
      Mikhail Sidorov 28 January 2022 17: 08
      +8
      And you need to start from school, if not from kindergarten, or rather from teachers.

      And who will conduct seminars for teachers?
      1. Ros 56
        Ros 56 29 January 2022 07: 30
        +3
        Well, there will be people for a good cause, not everyone has gone crazy.
    2. fa2998
      fa2998 28 January 2022 17: 30
      +10
      Quote: Ros 56
      The need to transform Russian society

      This thought has been around for a long time.

      And who will allow this transformation? hi
      1. dauria
        dauria 29 January 2022 04: 48
        +2
        The power, the possessing class, lives so well !! And the law enforcement agencies guard the peace.

        So he does not live behind a stone wall. Outside, the wolves are standing, drooling. Those very "power structures" must be fed and maintained, and for this a huge people are needed with a strong economy. If you fall behind, you will find yourself with a bow and arrows against a rifle. Osceola, a Seminole chief. The leader's close associates will be quickly thrown out of Florida into the desert to feed on lizards. wassat
      2. Ros 56
        Ros 56 29 January 2022 07: 37
        -1
        Life will force you, it is the best teacher, especially in light of our recent disagreements with the West.
    3. Sergey BM
      Sergey BM 29 January 2022 15: 16
      +1
      You are completely right!
      Only now the ruling class, not only here, is strenuously ruining education, planting ...
      "We need not creators, but literate consumers"
      1. Ros 56
        Ros 56 29 January 2022 16: 40
        -2
        Only a complete idiot could say that.
        1. Sergey BM
          Sergey BM 29 January 2022 16: 57
          +2
          ... the shortcoming of the Soviet education system was an attempt to form a human creator, and now the task is to nurture a qualified consumer who is able to skillfully use the results of the creativity of others
          The Minister said, Fursenko, Andrey Alexandrovich
          What is the people, such are the ministers.
          Although I distorted the quote, this is not a quote, but a popular retelling.
          1. Ros 56
            Ros 56 29 January 2022 17: 12
            -2
            I always had a low opinion of him when I heard him speak a couple of times.
  13. Spring fluff
    Spring fluff 28 January 2022 16: 21
    +2
    "...so far there are no driving forces, but in the wake of the demand for change, they will inevitably form. There is no main thing - the idea of ​​​​a competitive model of society that unites everyone, and the main task of Russian intellectuals is to formulate it and introduce it to the masses."
    well, what a pretense - and there are driving forces and ideas, and they have already been introduced into the masses.
    just recently, one ideologist was recognized as an extremist and packed for several years, and so it’s quite a force already.
  14. maiman61
    maiman61 28 January 2022 16: 23
    +10
    Russian society has already transformed! A small handful of those close to power seized all the national wealth of the country, and the whole people fell into poverty.
  15. Maks1995
    Maks1995 28 January 2022 16: 27
    +7
    Many words about and so understandable.
    But in real life, the Russian autocracy and kleptocracy are just powdering their brains.

    All these import substitutions, Chechen buggies, Russian processors, chess mats and petrels exist only in the media.

    And in real life I buy Chinese pencils in stores.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 28 January 2022 19: 05
      -13
      This all exists in reality - and the one who denies this clearly has schizophrenia and narrow-mindedness.
    2. V means B
      V means B 29 January 2022 21: 16
      0
      And nails with spoons.
  16. Pravodel
    Pravodel 28 January 2022 16: 28
    0
    -The fact that in Russia there is an urgent need to change the existing situation in politics and the economy, only the lazy do not notice. Russia is pregnant with the necessary conservative changes in the economy and politics. The only question is when these changes will come and who will ensure these changes.
    1. Russia does not need any conservative turn from below. This has already been done many times. Next time Russia will not survive.
    2. A conservative turn is possible only from above, relying on national patriotic forces and the national bourgeoisie, with the isolation of the comprador bourgeoisie and national traitors. In what form this will take place depends on the resistance of the compradors and traitors and their support from behind the hillock. But, in any case, Russia is capable of isolating and, in extreme cases, destroying both compradors and national traitors.
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 28 January 2022 16: 51
      -1
      As an option ... we have a clear patriot / follower of the communist ideology, who, about the Communist Party of the Russian Federation and its leaders, can only use foul language.
      He is looking, looking, for real, loyal fighters for communist ideas ... by the way, I have met more than one such.
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 28 January 2022 19: 07
        -12
        All these current "Reds" are completely populists and balabols - in fact, the efficiency of which is 0
        1. rocket757
          rocket757 28 January 2022 20: 26
          +1
          Everyone is never the same!
          Public faces attached to power ... it’s clear with them, traitors at 100
          1. Vadim237
            Vadim237 29 January 2022 11: 29
            -6
            Those who come to replace them will become the same in the procession, having felt the taste of power and big money.
            1. rocket757
              rocket757 29 January 2022 11: 35
              +1
              "Fire, water and copper pipes" ... which of them is the most dangerous named?
    2. IVANOV-GDLYAN
      IVANOV-GDLYAN 29 January 2022 20: 29
      -3
      Russia ALREADY has no time to reinvent the wheel ... The people of Russia are fed up with these "ISMs". Russia will be saved ONLY by resurgent Orthodoxy, socialism of the Chinese model and / or Constitutional Monarchy. Why in England, Japan, Spain, Sweden, Denmark, the Netherlands - the people kept the MONARCHY (albeit constitutional) ??? Because - in a democracy, scum and crooks EARLY or LATE will seize power and destroy the country. Democracy has one big minus, namely, it gives too much freedom and impunity to its opponents...
  17. Mikhail Sidorov
    Mikhail Sidorov 28 January 2022 16: 31
    +6
    Liked the article. I read it nodding my head in agreement. And then bang...
    And it is not just that the Communist Party of the Russian Federation is losing its authority and influence, it does not have mass support in society, its base is old people and leftists.

    I don’t remember exactly, but in my opinion Chubais said that we must wait until those who remember the USSR die and the communist electorate will naturally decrease. But since the age of 18 I have been voting for the Communist Party of the Russian Federation now 36. And at work there are many up to 40, hardworking guys who are for the Communist Party.
    1. Sergey BM
      Sergey BM 29 January 2022 15: 18
      -2
      Only those who voted for Prokhorov, as it were, no more!
  18. Iskander
    Iskander 28 January 2022 16: 33
    +3
    it is important to understand: what are we guided by? a common good for the population of one single country? union?
    universal planetary impasse of plutocracy?
    a basis for the revival of a more harmonious and stable structure in the territory of the former USSR?
    or trying to give birth to something in a hurry under the yoke of sworn partners?
    in any case, it is important that people got wind of it, that it was possible to rebuild socialism according to the Chinese scenario, without the collapse of a large and powerful country, in the interests of other countries, with the impoverishment of a huge number of the population and the enrichment of the ultra-small ....
    in China, meanwhile, they defeated poverty and became a superpower, from which it clearly follows that there is an elite that is resistant to external influences and able to enrich themselves and maintain the growth of prosperity for their people, able to keep the good from socialism and take the best from capitalism.
    and it’s strange that we don’t want to learn from them and vegetate in timelessness and hopelessness, in a situation where rosy-cheeked colonels keep unimaginable amounts of money in their homes and apartments ....
    and discussions in the social sphere are of the nature:
    "" prohibit stealing from the budget in the military sphere, under threat of the death penalty,! steal current from grandmothers))) "", instead of proclaiming at least for a start: "" steal in the military sector, just do it very well !!! "", and then even reach the common truth that the military budget with poor intelligence, he hasn’t saved anyone yet, the army is only completing what the spies have already done))))
  19. Iskander
    Iskander 28 January 2022 16: 41
    0
    Quote: Plate
    A statesman in Russia, by definition, must be a supporter of the immediate return of Soviet power.

    Just like that without any alternative, without any pluralism of opinions?

    gi gi .... ha ha ... revive the sect of those who believe in the superiority of the Marxist-Leninist methodology????? so nonche even god kuzya and vissarion for evidence-based medicine!!!
    I don’t know if it’s for the money of sworn partners, or from a great sovereign mind, the author advances a destructive stratagem: “throw a dead cat to steal your soul” ....
  20. rocket757
    rocket757 28 January 2022 16: 44
    +6
    Political maneuvers of the Russian authorities
    . Mimicry, a chameleon, changing shoes on the go .... whatever you call it, but in principle the system is one, THE POWER OF THE RICH, THE RIGHT OF THE RICH, and duties on .... everyone else !!!
    That's all, the rest is all details, nothing and does not change anything.
  21. Knell wardenheart
    Knell wardenheart 28 January 2022 16: 45
    +7
    Seeing this, the ruling class, in order to avoid losing power, tried to change the paradigm by promoting a new team headed by Putin to the political Olympus, which has already begun to introduce and implement the ideology of liberal conservatism based on defending state national interests, strengthening the role of the state, forming not a comprador, but national bourgeoisie and the revival of state corporations with the possible participation of private and foreign capital

    Arguments about any "liberalism" of Putin make me laugh in Homeric. Where did Putin and the team work on EXPANDING rights and freedoms? On the contrary, the screws were consistently tightened - for the media, for rich people who were not involved in the circle, for entrepreneurs, for the rights of ordinary people - for some time this "as if" was profitable, after the revelry of the 90s. But it stopped very quickly. But that didn't stop the process. The author contrasts VVP and Co with the post-Soviet nomenklatura, but by the age and party service past of these people it is very clear that they are this very post-Soviet nomenclature. The last generation is.

    The social structure of society has a complex nature, the classical opposition of classes (according to Marx - the bourgeoisie and the proletariat) today in Russia is not even close, there is no proletariat itself - the social base of the left protest movement.

    Our narrow-minded leftists still prefer not to notice this. From their point of view, society is united, like the ranks of the "class enemy". And they are still looking for his "magic formula" from Marx, focusing on it with the tenacity of a maniac.
    And here it is:
    All parliamentary parties enjoy negligible prestige in society and cannot be the locomotive of change. None of them can offer a national idea that unites society, capable of forming a single political, economic and ideological semantic field.

    ... comes out of the previous one - the largest politically organized and at the same time opposition-minded part of society - has degraded (the Communist Party of the Russian Federation) to its current state, having lost 2/3 of the electorate, breaking into small, meaningless rumors, not evolving according to the current structure of society, not making their ideas more intelligibly and more attractively in relation to today's day. However, the leftist ideas themselves roam in society, on the one hand, not being able to turn into any serious political movement (due to dogmatism and archaism), on the other hand, paralyzing the further thought of a significant part of people who are in captivity of near-Left fantasies.

    This state of affairs inevitably disperses the patriotic and creative-minded part of society - either taking it out of politics or forcing it to be "fellow travelers" in the ranks of the only political force in the country.
    The traditional “left-right” mentality, the views on which are held by a significant part of society, is largely hindered by the deepening of political thought and the formation of influential parties. From the point of view of these people, the world is the result of two colors. This is another Soviet rudiment, so densely crammed into people's heads that it resonates among their offspring as well.

    I cannot share your optimism in the "unified impulse of anti-Western Antagonism." For a significant part of society, these remnants of leftist ideas and ostentatious anti-Westernism coexist very harmoniously in an environment of internal doublethink - a person will find fault and stigmatize the West, pictorially despising and overthrowing it, but at the same time - the same, if not more contempt will cause him and domestic initiatives and institutions, in this struggle he will be more inclined "passively" to the perception of the Western picture and Western culture, to greater confidence in the Western view of things.
    Behind all this talk about "the West robbed, the West humiliated" - everyone remembers very well who exactly "lost" their Soviet deposits, who takes billions of dollars abroad, who raises gas prices and lies without blinking from TV screens.
    On a subconscious level, the West will be perceived as a "little devil", just as people once chose Yeltsin "to spite" Gorbachev.
    1. kin
      kin 28 January 2022 19: 16
      +1
      Here is the first comrade who mentioned Putin, most likely a non-local one. The rest carry some kind of blizzard. The author, in general, dragged in some kind of ideological influence of the West. Who does it affect and what does it represent? Yachts, palaces, private jets - this is a purely Western influence and it has zombified so much that for thirty years the country has been flying into the abyss. Who then rules the country, according to the author, a protege of the West.
    2. Mikhail Sidorov
      Mikhail Sidorov 28 January 2022 20: 05
      0
      degraded (KPRF) to its current state, having lost 2/3 of the electorate,

      Where are you getting data about 2/3 of the electorate from? What year are you comparing it to? Lie and don't blush...
      1. Knell wardenheart
        Knell wardenheart 28 January 2022 20: 18
        0
        Quote: Mikhail Sidorov
        Where are you getting data about 2/3 of the electorate from? What year are you comparing it to? Lie and don't blush...


        Well, let me lie and not blush.
        Elections of 1996 candidate of the Communist Party (Zyuganov) - 32.03% of the vote.
        The 2018 elections are the candidate of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (Grudinin) - 11.77% of the vote.
        Conclusion on the drain of the electorate in the presidential elections - merged 2/3 of the electorate.

        Elections of 1995 to the State Duma (KPRF) - 157 seats.
        Elections of 2021 to the State Duma (KPRF) - 57 seats.
        The conclusion on the drain of the electorate for elections to the State Duma is almost 2/3.

        Dispute?
        1. Mikhail Sidorov
          Mikhail Sidorov 28 January 2022 20: 21
          -1
          You play with numbers according to the number of seats in the State Duma. And look at the numbers by the votes of the population.
          1. Knell wardenheart
            Knell wardenheart 28 January 2022 20: 25
            +1
            This, as you put it, "playing with numbers" is the whole essence of the political struggle and its effectiveness expressed in numbers. If we talk about "public support" and "voices of the population" - then I highly recommend that you remember what the actions and marches of the left forces were in the 90s and what they are now. Even so, what they were before people began to be imprisoned for paper cups. Heaven and earth.
            But you are a man of Faith, you will not be convinced by the numbers. That's what I'm writing about - we have a lot of people like you. For whom the sledgehammer at close range is not visible until they themselves are flattened.
            1. Mikhail Sidorov
              Mikhail Sidorov 28 January 2022 20: 53
              0
              You wrote about the electorate, not the number of seats in the State Duma. 1999 - 16,1 million people 2021 - there are 10,6 million losses, but obviously not 2/3.
  22. LCA
    LCA 28 January 2022 17: 06
    -4
    Any society is a self-governing system, which is under the supervision of hierarchically higher management systems, which in some way correct its self-government regime in cases where the real process of self-government does not supercritically meet the requirements imposed on it by hierarchically higher management. In other words:
    • people who make up society do what they want and what does not cause their categorical rejection, and do not do what they do not want and what causes their categorical rejection;
    • The Almighty, for his part, watches this process and, exercising the hierarchically highest comprehensive management, one way or another leads to the collapse of the cause of those who have exhausted His allowance for people to make mistakes, and provides support to all those who work to achieve the goals of His Providence.
    -----------------------
    According to this view, the entire history of Russia after the Decembrist uprising until the end of the civil war and the formation of the USSR on December 30, 1922, is a process of transfer of intra-social power from the Romanov dynasty to the Bolsheviks.
    ------------
    And one should not be deceived by the thoughts that the Almighty made a mistake and, as a result of His mistake, the ideal Orthodox empire collapsed and the Bolsheviks’ “goal-fighting power” reigned in the country, and now Russia is moving towards the church-monarchist or church-republican ideal that it once lost.
    ------------------
    Also, one should not be deceived by the thought that this was a test of the Orthodox for steadfastness in faith: the Almighty already knows everything about the capabilities and intentions of each person and therefore does not need such tests.
    One can think so only by ignoring and denying the omens-warnings that Russian culture has preserved and which were given from Above for more than half a century preceding the catastrophe of 1917.
    ----------------
    But God is neither a sadist nor a tyrant. Therefore, if the life of society flows in the direction of a catastrophe, then instructions are given on how it can be avoided. However, it is up to the people themselves to take meaningful action to avoid disaster.
    ----------------------
    The Russian military-economic miracle - the dream of some fans of "alternative history" - was objectively impossible in the Russian Empire due to the sinful cultural policy of the ruling regime for at least more than half a century. This policy gave rise to a hopeless state of society, which V.O. Klyuchevsky described in the following words:
    --------
    “In Russia there are no average talents, simple craftsmen, but there are lonely geniuses and millions of worthless people. Geniuses can't do anything because they don't have apprentices, and nothing can be done about millions because they don't have masters. The former are useless because there are too few of them; the latter are helpless because there are too many of them.
    ---------------
    And after 1991, Russia and all post-Soviet states again returned to the same state.
  23. The comment was deleted.
  24. The comment was deleted.
    1. Knell wardenheart
      Knell wardenheart 28 January 2022 19: 41
      +1
      Over the past millennium, Russia-Russia has been fluttering in the nets of the biblical project of enslaving all mankind on behalf of God: however, until now, the enslavers have not achieved such success as they were able to achieve in the West, but Russia-Russia does not have freedom either.

      Let me get to the bottom of it! Did I understand you correctly - do you reject the humanistic message of Christianity, unambiguously writing it down as evil?) Following this, you reject all the success of our civilizational project from the actual designation in the form of a state, and until today?) Otherwise, I cannot interpret the expression "On throughout the last millennium, Russia-Russia has been fluttering in the nets of the biblical project. It's hard to be successful when you're fluttering.
      But then your thought continues, and you are taken to "however, to date, the enslavers have not achieved the success that they could achieve in the West"

      In other words, are you saying that the degree of enslavement of a person-system in our country is even less than in the West?)
      I'm just afraid to read further, in fact, you probably might come across the idea that Santa Claus gives gifts to people, so that later at night he will come and eat their liver, that flowers grow in order to fill the whole earth and poison our breath with their pollen that the expansion of the migration of Central Asia to Russia is good, because there are completely strong families and highly moral people, well, and other things that can tear my miserable philistine brain to shreds.
      Where does all this hidden knowledge come from, you might be curious?
      1. LCA
        LCA 28 January 2022 20: 45
        -2
        And humanity will have to rethink what is in the creeds (Christianity, Judaism, historical Islam, Koranic Islam (the Koran) from God, which is, and what was introduced there through thoughtlessness, by foolishness or malice, and for what purpose.
        In Islam, one must distinguish between historical Islam (worship of the rug) and Koranic Islam (Koran). And in the Quran there is a lot of useful knowledge from God, who exists - this requires reflection, as in other respects the Bible also requires reflection (what is there on behalf of a god who does not exist - for what purpose and for what?).
        And creeds, churches, synagogues, mosques are the product of human hands. These are all crowd management tools.
      2. Sergey BM
        Sergey BM 29 January 2022 15: 28
        0
        Did I understand you correctly - you reject the humanistic message of Christianity
        Expressed in mass burnings, at least a little with the message of those who disagree?!
        And do not supposedly this is not Russia, in real life Russia is burning in iron cages and Joseph Volotsky.
  25. seacap
    seacap 28 January 2022 17: 25
    +4
    As, in my opinion, an ordinary layman who does not pretend to be an observer and analyst, but who has a normal Soviet education and the ability to think a little instilled since then, one can agree with much of what is stated in the article. To begin with, the term "elite" is agricultural, in our case it is better to use the nobility and the beau monde. Their task was, first of all, to destroy such a formation as the "socialist community of people." Hence the ardent anti-Sovietism, coming from the very top, passing through the media and the so-called. art, primary school and other education, all these "memorials", Yeltsin centers, Gaidar parties, etc. on the topic: how will we continue to dereban this territory, fear and rejection of any mention of the word ideology, and most importantly, systematic and purposeful creation inherited class society, separated by a social and legislative abyss. In power are all the same people who betrayed and destroyed a great power for the sake of satisfying their desire to monetize power, the unbridled desire to satisfy their petty-bourgeois ambitions, as a result of intellectual and moral degradation, all of them still continue to sleep softly and eat sweetly. Stupid from the dough, imaginary omnipotence, complete impunity and permissiveness, they rage in the devastated expanses of the once great country, and there, smearing snot on their whipped cheeks, they obsequiously say that we are the same as you, not realizing that they will never be their own there, that all the seats in the "parterre" were distributed several centuries ago, and there is no place for them even in the foyer.
    The structure and system that is taking shape in the economy is increasingly acquiring the features of a colonial type, where only that which is beneficial to the overseas metropolis and financial speculators receives relative development. Everything else is just an imitation to create the appearance and imitation of sovereignty for internal use, the true sovereignty and power of the state is determined by the economy, its potential, including mobilization, and not the presence of missiles and tanks, the production of which can be stopped by 1 click of an external source and plunged country in the Middle Ages without any bombing. Such conclusions can also be confirmed by the actions of the country's leadership, formed according to medieval principles of personal loyalty and nepotism without regard to professional and business qualities, all decisions and activities of which are more similar to the work of the colonial administration to ensure profit from controlled territories to solve the problems of the economy of the metropolis. Everything immediately falls into place, the withdrawal of capital and all sorts of budgetary rules that prohibit investing in the economy and the social sector, the uncontrolled and no longer even hidden total export of gold, before the impending crisis, when all countries collect it literally by the gram, the destruction of science and education, deindustrialization and the destruction of the people, in fact genocide. All this is covered with a cynical lie that has permeated all the structures of the state, the judicial, legal and electoral systems, representative power, which does not represent anyone, the media, all the issues of life in the country. The prospects for the future progress of such a country are sad and unpredictable, and the saddest thing is that there is no power capable of changing negative trends, Russia is tired and does not want to live.
  26. The comment was deleted.
  27. The comment was deleted.
  28. LCA
    LCA 28 January 2022 17: 44
    -3
    An accomplished person is a meaningful will in line with the personal confession of the Providence of God on the basis of an innate religious feeling - conscience. This is the human type of structure of the psyche. A person who has taken place (having a stable human mentality) is the vicar of God on Earth.
    --------
    But the achievement in the personal development of the human type of mental structure is not an end in itself, but the construction of the basis for further life and activity in line with Providence as the vicar of God on Earth.
    --------
    Moreover, the transformation of one's own psyche to the human system is the work that no one else can and will not do for the person himself.
    ------------
    But this is not an end in itself, but only the creation of a stable basis for further personal and, as a consequence, social development, since society cannot develop otherwise than through the personal development of people, this is a society of components.
    ---------
    The personal spirituality of all people should give rise to the collective spirituality of society so that our home - planet Earth - is comfortable. And God - the Creator and Almighty - to all of us in this matter - to help.
    ------------------
    Therefore:
    • the liquidation of any exploitation of “man by man” is not the writing and enforcement of laws on “public property”, the prohibition of the exploitation of “man by man”, etc.,
    • a liquidation of the system of preliminary oppression and perversion of personal development, which is necessary to ensure the comprehensive and complete personal development of all.
    -------------
    And the elimination of the system of oppression of "man by man," as is clear from history, is one of the highest-priority goals of controlling Almightiness.
    ----------
    An element of this comprehensive and complete personal development of society is universal managerial literacy in relation to the life of society in its various aspects: "every cook must learn to manage the state."
  29. LCA
    LCA 28 January 2022 17: 49
    -3
    Gaining a sufficient breadth of horizons is one of the internal incentives for the transition to the human type of mental structure from any other.
    ------------
    There is only one level of gaining freedom: a person, acting conscientiously in line with God's Providence, is able to independently master and produce from scratch new knowledge and skills for him and society in advance or at the pace of the situation.
    -------
    If all adults can do this, then this society cannot be a crowd-“elitist”, and even more so, its fascisization is impossible, since in such a society the emergence and reproduction of the monopoly of certain social groups on any knowledge is impossible.
    1. Knell wardenheart
      Knell wardenheart 28 January 2022 19: 32
      +2
      I have only one question that has been tormenting me for the second article. Sorry for the tediousness, but do you put some kind of hidden meaning into the number of hyphens that separate your thoughts?-)
      1. LCA
        LCA 28 January 2022 21: 07
        -3
        Execution cannot be pardoned. Punctuation marks are needed to convey your idea unambiguously.
  30. p0pulivox
    p0pulivox 28 January 2022 19: 20
    -1
    A very ambiguous and controversial article ...
  31. nikvic46
    nikvic46 28 January 2022 20: 32
    +2
    Now a dispute has flared up about when it was better, yesterday or today. The main accusation of yesterday's life is the shortage of food, the inability to travel abroad. Now there is no shortage, freedom to travel abroad, currency exchange. But you have to pay for everything. The absence of a deficit, free travel abroad, all sorts of freedoms is the price for optimizing health care, for unemployment, for homeless people living near us, for a beggarly salary. This is what we pay for democracy. And that's not all. Wars break out here and there around us. The ideology of man is being imposed on man is a wolf. True, most do not lend themselves to this. But the worst of trouble is the beginning.
    1. Adrey
      Adrey 28 January 2022 21: 47
      +2
      Are you sure that the weight given in your post is interconnected by 100 /?
  32. faterdom
    faterdom 28 January 2022 21: 13
    0
    In our country, the power and shades of eras are very personified.
    Over the past 100 years, only Chernenko and the Bulganin-Malenkov triumvirate, and someone else who joined them, did not define different, very different eras with their personalities.
    Therefore, our people perceive the change of the Leader with fear, they fear that it will be worse.
    Moreover, interestingly, the previous Leader almost never had in mind his next successor, except perhaps Yeltsin, and then he had little idea and knew his protégé.
    So, I am waiting with interest for the next Leader (Leader, Secretary General, Elbasy...), and only then will it be clear where we will be taken.
    By the way, Medvedev should not be listed among the Leaders - he was not one, and, I hope, will not be.
  33. p0pulivox
    p0pulivox 28 January 2022 21: 13
    -1
    As for the transformation of the Russian economy, if this is true, then everything is still sad:
    Free Press: Budget 2022-2024
    For example, we are looking for the word "machine tool industry" ... Yes, there is such a word, it is mentioned once. In the column "Other budget allocations" are "Subsidies to manufacturers of machine-tool products in order to provide buyers with a discount when purchasing such products." The total amount of funding is three times a billion, that is, 3 billion rubles.
    For comparison. “Subsidies to the federal state enterprise “Russian State Circus Company” to support the development of circus activities” - more than 3,3 billion rubles! That is, clowns are a priority, machines are not needed.
    ...
    “Technoporak, technopark… An ordinary office center, nothing more. Unless sometimes officials came and staged a “show” - they printed out a plastic one (short unprintable word) on a Chinese 3D printer, and then they reported on breakthrough technologies, ”says Sergey, a former employee of the capital’s technopark.
    We go further, we are looking for the word "radio electronics". Yes, there is such a thing - the State Program of the Russian Federation "Development of the electronic and radio-electronic industry". 1 billion rubles for three years, not even funny.
    And we compare again. The subsidy of the religious organization Russian Orthodox Old Believer Church - more than 1,3 billion rubles.
    ... There is not a word about the production of tools, machine tools, etc. in the document, all this, apparently, is superfluous.
    But there is a subsidy from a certain autonomous non-profit organization "Engineering and Innovation Support Center" in order to create tools to refine the products of technology companies to the requirements of large corporations. According to the registry, this legal entity was created quite recently, on 24.08.2021/10/XNUMX, the founders are unknown. In general, nothing is known. But they are immediately given XNUMX billion rubles. You see, they deserve it.

    Etc. etc.
  34. alone
    alone 28 January 2022 21: 35
    -1
    The number of poor people in a country is proportional to its natural wealth. This is a well-known and proven fact.
  35. olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 28 January 2022 22: 50
    +3
    I think it's time to call a spade a spade, and not be scattered - isms (capital, communal, etc.) that need to be removed or returned. A person lives, the whole complex of human actions is his life activity. The state is the result of the evolutionary process of uniting people in order to ensure the vital activity of each individual. In the state there are rules of conduct, called laws.
    The task of the state, which belongs to the civilized, is to ensure the optimal life of everyone. In detail, the following is obtained: for human life, air, water, food, and protection from the environment (clothes, shoes, housing) are needed. . Next comes the deepening of concepts (production, production of means of production, etc. until the extraction of raw materials, training (behavior, interaction, etc., the acquisition of work skills to create material wealth), recovery measures (medicine), protection from external forces. All these functions should work optimally.
    And stop misleading people with verbiage.
    Today there is a desecration of the meaning of life, the right of people to life and development. . All modern problems are from stupidity. Mankind creates artificial problems for which there is no solution. For example, the imposition of excessive consumption, which pollutes nature and destroys the planet. Having cheated, he begins to look for ways, and most importantly, means for solving .. Humanity is facing the threat of destruction, because someone decided that there are too many people. We don't appreciate what we have. And the people of Russia should be proud of their ancestors, who have mastered vast spaces for the life of future generations, take care of them, live and develop. It is useless to listen to the sweet speeches of others, accustomed to getting rich by robbing other peoples, from century to century attacking Russia in order to destroy the country and people, inventing ways of enslavement. They have nothing to be proud of, except for lies, deceit, and outbursts of misanthropy. The people of each country must live their lives, defend this right from generation to generation. It is no coincidence that people of different skin colors and eye shapes live in different territories, speak different languages, eat different foods. There should be different states in the world, each of which solves its vital problems on its own territory and on its own. We need an independent Russia, above all from the whims of others.
    1. IVANOV-GDLYAN
      IVANOV-GDLYAN 28 January 2022 23: 37
      -1
      Through the mouth of "OLYMPIAD15" - the truth speaks ... Thank you Friend!!! And in general - you are a good person and your eyes are kind ...
    2. dauria
      dauria 29 January 2022 05: 28
      +2
      The state is the result of the evolutionary process of uniting people in order to ensure the vital activity of each individual

      Go crazy .... It remains to add heredity, variability and natural selection. laughing
      Actually I'm not laughing - in general you are right. The state is the result of evolution and selection. Only now the bison mammals were generally exterminated by the mammalian monkeys walking on two legs. wink Here is your
      There should be different states in the world, each of which solves its vital problems on its own territory and on its own.

      There is such a thing in biophysics (and not only) - the trigger effect. Its essence is that if two self-reproducing systems use the same resources, then the balance is unstable and inevitably slides into the dominance of one and the half-dead existence of the other. And for balance
      someone "from above" (from outside) will have to hold both of them by the scruff of the neck.
  36. IVANOV-GDLYAN
    IVANOV-GDLYAN 28 January 2022 23: 16
    -1
    ".... the transition from the liberal-conservative model to the "left turn" is a utopia, there is neither a social base nor driving forces for this. The class instinct of the liberals and the big bourgeoisie will never allow this.... Absolutely disagree with this opinion! THE OVERHANDING MOST of the Russian people do not give a damn about the class instincts of the liberals, and especially the big bourgeoisie, and it is the liberals (+ the corrupt and thieving nomenklatura, which occasionally protects the leaders of various organized criminal groups ...) with the big bourgeoisie do everything (willingly or involuntarily ... not the essence is important ...) so that a terrible social explosion occurs with all the consequences.
    """..... There is no main thing - the idea of ​​a competitive model of society that unites everyone, and the main task of Russian intellectuals is to formulate it and introduce it to the masses ....""".
    Seriously??? Is it??? Most Russian intellectuals (by the way, the people have long had a gag reflex from these tricky and pretentious labels for the "chosen ones" ...) have long exhausted themselves and secretly (or obviously ...) work for the interests of the West, and not for the interests of the ALL people RF ... ONLY ORTHODOXY WILL SAVE RUSSIA, which for more than 1000 (!) Years has taken its true place above the VERY TOP of the power pyramid of Russia (pro-Western lovers to separate the Church from the state or the spiritual power from the secular - voluntarily or unwittingly "pour water on the mill" of the Evil ...). An effective model of state. devices in the Russian Federation (the distribution of power in the country) - there can be ONLY a UNITARY state. An effective political regime in the Russian Federation (the nature of relations between power and people) is ONLY an AUTHORITARY political regime with a DOMINATION (!) of the methods of communism (socialism) of the Chinese model. An effective form of government (who owns power) is ONLY a constitutional monarchy, where the Monarch will have power on the order is greater than that of the appointed (or elected ... it doesn’t matter ...) prime minister (essentially - supply manager, manager-manager, administrator and responsible for the "economy" ...).
  37. Scientist
    Scientist 29 January 2022 09: 20
    +2
    The author did not notice one very significant detail - digitalization. It is not just carried out at the Stakhanovite pace. And it assumes total control not only over income and expenses, but also over any movements and actions of a person, and even over his thoughts (they are already trying to create a system that determines a dangerous direction of thoughts by posts on social networks. While talking about teenagers). After building such a "digital" society, it will be possible to talk about its change only with external influence. Well, or in a catastrophic conflict among the elite.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 29 January 2022 12: 12
      -5
      And what is your claim to such a digital system for the economy and the life of society - it’s bad that more crooks and thieves will be caught at all levels, or that everyone will honestly start paying taxes in view of the introduction of a fully digital currency under the control of the tax authorities online or all sorts of extremists and their curators with terrorists in society to identify as well as potential killers and other rabble.
      1. Sergey BM
        Sergey BM 29 January 2022 15: 32
        0
        The claim is that production is unthinkable without violating tax laws.
        We have such laws.
        From the tax authorities comes a huge amount of harm to the country.
        And it survives largely due to crooks.
      2. IVANOV-GDLYAN
        IVANOV-GDLYAN 29 January 2022 20: 01
        +2
        The scientist is right. WITHOUT the eradication of corruption, embezzlement and organized crime groups in the Russian Federation (under the roof of werewolves in uniform and ties ...) - total digitalization will only bring great harm to the people ...
      3. Scientist
        Scientist 31 January 2022 17: 38
        +1
        Is it naivete or bias? Oligarchs will honestly pay taxes? Or will they tax anyone who sells an unnecessary thing over the Internet? Will detailed information be needed for the development of the economy or for the introduction of new taxes? Technology doesn't make life better or worse, it does the way it is used.
  38. Mikhail3
    Mikhail3 29 January 2022 09: 58
    -3
    Either Russian society will transform back into Russian, or the country will perish. Briefly and clearly.
    1. Sergey BM
      Sergey BM 29 January 2022 15: 40
      -2
      Transforms into a community of Turkic-speaking migrants.
      It already is.
      In prosperous enclaves.
      I work in drilling - in the town there are two Russians out of a whole crowd of 40 people!
      There are normal Russians, strong, persistent and distinguished by other worthy qualities.
      Only Caucasians, etc. there are many, many more.
      And for some reason other Russians are fat, inactive, not particularly capable of work ...
      They don’t even hire them for normal work - they don’t want to, like it’s better to drive and enjoy moonshine at home than to work at -40
    2. IVANOV-GDLYAN
      IVANOV-GDLYAN 29 January 2022 19: 52
      0
      Either the Russians will be a "cementing" and state-forming people in MULTINATIONAL RUSSIA, or there will be no Russia at all ... From the word at all ...
      1. Sergey BM
        Sergey BM 29 January 2022 20: 49
        -3
        Don't worry, there will be something else.
        We will not perish, the light has not converged on the Russians like a wedge.
        Apocalypse from their absence is not expected.
        1. IVANOV-GDLYAN
          IVANOV-GDLYAN 29 January 2022 22: 09
          -2
          Do you recall the words of Putin??? I remind you: "Who needs a world where there will be no Russia ???" ". Or here's another:" Russia will be STRONG, or it will not be AT ALL ...". I hope you understand me .... Or in an armored train sitting out your pants? :-)...
          1. Sergey BM
            Sergey BM 30 January 2022 04: 13
            -2
            Do you recall the words of Putin???
            That's what me absolutely not interested because these are the words of the old plutocrat-senile.
            There won't be any goodies.
            There will be something else.
            Russia is not the USSR, no one will cry for it, except for a handful of inadequate ones.
            1. IVANOV-GDLYAN
              IVANOV-GDLYAN 30 January 2022 19: 42
              -3
              Oh, that's how it is ... I see ... Well, your too "adequate" opinion is also of little interest to anyone in Russia ... Will there be something else? What exactly? Freedom of gay, lesbian and feminist parades??
              1. Sergey BM
                Sergey BM 30 January 2022 20: 56
                -2
                Listen, can you read?
                Did you see it above?
                I work on a drilling rig in a mostly Turkic-speaking team...
                And my social circle at home is almost the same.
                What are blue?
                Never seen in my life!
                I heard that there is, but in order to in kind ...
                What the hell are feminists?
                What are you talking about?!
                Let's cut the homosexuals to hell...
                For it is said - a thief, if he stops stealing - he will be in Paradise!
                A homosexual will never see Paradise.
                You're so specifically in the wrong place that it's even funny
                1. IVANOV-GDLYAN
                  IVANOV-GDLYAN 30 January 2022 21: 39
                  -3
                  """... It doesn't matter, there will be something else.
                  We will not perish, the light has not converged on the Russians like a wedge.
                  Apocalypse from their absence is not expected .... There will be no alright.
                  There will be something else.
                  Russia is not the USSR, no one will cry for it, except for a handful of inadequate .... ". Your words? Or will you go into a dry refusal?? You will have to answer for the market and to the fullest extent ...
                  1. Sergey BM
                    Sergey BM 30 January 2022 21: 45
                    -3
                    Just what's the gossip here?
                    Without Russians - we'll manage, this is also true of my words.
                    We have been getting along for decades, in the town I have two Russians from the whole crowd.
                    Yes - there is nothing to grieve and cry about, society and the country will not suffer much, it has been verified.
                    PS: what about the answer - are you trying to make a fuss like?
                    So it's not scary, I'll scare anyone you want.
  39. 1536
    1536 29 January 2022 11: 05
    -1
    Quote: tralflot1832
    And who are the unifiers of the Russian people. Who are the Russian intellectuals?

    How, don't you know? These are 80-90-year-old elders (God bless them) who write "history" textbooks for schools and universities, who create Russian-British universities, introduced the Unified State Examination, and "social natural selection" in society. Ask the people who make their way to work every morning in multimillion-dollar metropolitan areas, what do they want? Take a look at the sociological research conducted among the youth, what do young people want, how do they live? Ordinary people want neither parties nor revolutions. And they do not see in these concepts the goal of achieving their well-being. Unless, of course, it's not a criminal element or a hangover.
    In the 30 years since the collapse of the USSR, little has changed. The people still want to live well, but instead of giving people an education and the prospect of a better life associated with it, they are read the fairy tale "By the Command of the Pike" every day, which does not allow them to move forward. Emelya, by all indications, should become a great leader, apparently. There are already examples in the post-Soviet countries - the former republics of the USSR.
    Or they try to educate servants of the "golden billion".
    1. Sergey BM
      Sergey BM 29 January 2022 15: 42
      +1
      Yes, they destroy education, they are afraid of the informed and smart.
      More marketers, more merchandisers like...
  40. Engineer Schukin
    Engineer Schukin 29 January 2022 16: 34
    +2
    Quote: Plate
    and we will do it if we want

    we will do it if they sell us machine tools, equipment, technologies, element base, materials, etc.
    in the meantime, we ourselves can not do anything without imported technology.
    1. Sergey BM
      Sergey BM 29 January 2022 20: 53
      0
      And also - if they teach you how to do it.
      The industrialization of the USSR was forged in America, and not where ...
      Albert Kan, with his bureau, designed and organized the construction of 571 facilities, including ChTZ, KhTZ, etc. etc.
  41. UltraRed
    UltraRed 30 January 2022 15: 12
    0
    An attempt at a class analysis of Russian society, of course, pleases ..... :)
    ..... BUT, - I think this is not so .... IMHO, of course .....
    Political power in Russia (do not confuse this with the economic system!), As well as in the PRC, is in the hands of the proletariat .....:) The question is what???
    Because the proletariat did not disappear at all, but on the contrary increased, but most importantly, it very strongly differentiated into subclasses. (As well as the bourgeoisie, but that is another question.)
    so-called. The "administrative proletariat" (in the Djilas paradigm - "nomenklatura", hereinafter referred to as "stubborn") realized their subclass interests in essence and became the ruling class from the moment the "Khrushchevites" consolidated power.
    In the "collective West" (including the USA), the "upry" also achieved a significant "place in the sun", however, not replacing the big bourgeoisie, but entering into consensus with it. The latter went for it, under the influence of the revolutions in Russia and China, where the union of various subclasses of the proletariat (and the situational use of unresolved problems of the petty-bourgeois peasantry) led to the collapse of the national bourgeoisie.
    Since the beginning of the 70s, there has been a certain "sniffing" of the Soviet, Chinese and Western ruling elites on the basis of common subclass interests.
    Kuusinov's idea of ​​"Europe from the English Channel to Vladivostok" was "shaken off the naphthalene", plus the economic fantasies of O. Shik about "convergence" (I'm talking about the "Lieberman" reform, which became the political and economic platform for the revival of the bourgeois class in the USSR in the form of "shadow companies" and merging with they were part of the "controls"). But the "entry" did not work out. Despite the parody-puppet "creation of the big Russian bourgeoisie", which, of course, tried to show the attempts of political subjectivity in the "seven-bankers", but the "chekists" quickly showed "who is the boss in the house" when it smelled of the complete incapacity of the authorities "a la the summer of 1917."
    "Where do you see the state?" (c) From the reception of the freshly baked president
    one of the leaders of the Duma faction ....... :)
    "Enterprise" did not work primarily because of the geopolitical ambitions of the Yuska elite, who reasonably considered that sharing the milking of a European cow was out of their hands. Especially if the nouveau riche of the "global elite" and so "everything is crumbling."
    "Bolivar can't take two, can he?".....
    "Nothing personal....."......
    The Chinese "goons" turned out to be less gullible, and the Chiamerica project was answered with tanks on Tyaanmen, despite the huge mutual trade turnover.
    However, this is all very brief, it would be necessary to write a whole article, but all hands do not reach ......
    Now the main thing....
    And what about the prospects of the Russian society in such "layouts"?
    Optimistic:
    - geopolitical confrontation and the "general crisis of the MMC" (which, as an extensive type of reproduction, will inevitably be replaced by "something else", since the "non-rubber ball" process has been permanent since 1914) -> = the reproduction of the subclass of "techies" (practically killed by the deindustrialization of the 90s), who, in alliance with the "working aristocracy" of the industrial proletariat, will be able to "force" the ruling elite of the "upr" to a consensus that -> = recreating a "gossots" like the USSR 2.0, taking into account the errors of the first version;
    Pessimistic:
    - the "upry" are merging with the subclasses of the "financial bourgeoisie" and the top "IT techies" (most likely, not globally, but in large economic regions of sales markets) - > = creation of a "multi-story humanity", i.e. technogenic fascism, with full control over the exploited classes, up to biological-electronic.In short, "electronic concentration camp" + Orwell's "1984".

    The rest of the trends are somewhere in between.
    It's hard to calculate exactly.

    Attempts at serious state building in a large country based on the petty and middle bourgeoisie are counterproductive. And the "upry" by the way quite understand this.

    There are quite a lot of analysts who understand the problem, but it is more difficult with solutions ...
    Somehow modern Marxes and Lenins are not yet visible ....
    If anyone knows - tell me, read, think .....
    1. place
      place 31 January 2022 15: 04
      -2
      Quote: UltraRed
      analysts who understand the problems, but the solutions are more difficult ....... Somehow the modern Marxes and Lenins are not yet visible .... If anyone knows, tell me, read, think .....

      Here's what you think about ..... the progress of society initially comes not from "understanding" Marx and Lenin, but from spontaneous social movements. The Marxes and Lenins only served them in the same way that bourgeois politicians serve the interests of the bourgeois classes, "subclasses" and others.
      That's why it's "more difficult with the ways", then you turn a blind eye to such movements in our society. Bury your head in the sand.

      These movements are the gradual replacement of Russians by other peoples and the exclusion from public life (and from life in general). As a people incapable of self-organization due to chronic NOT receptivity to any ideas or religions. (Whoever does not believe in anything is ready to pretend that he believed in everything. The day before yesterday - Christians, yesterday - atheists, today again Christians, the day before yesterday "God save the Tsar", yesterday "proletarians unite", today "proletarians - yes, you all go ..."......This is our history of the 20th century in a nutshell.) But the other peoples mentioned will inevitably create the type of statehood they need. And they will instantly find their Marxes and Lenins
      It is a pity that the "state-forming" precisely today, precisely in our days, turned out to be in fact completely non-state and demanding nothing from any state. If only the State were Soviet, even anti-Soviet .. he doesn’t care and it all comes down only to complaints that everyone always oppressed him and he got kicks from everyone and everyone lived at his expense and everyone is to blame for him.
  42. The comment was deleted.
  43. amr
    amr 2 February 2022 12: 54
    0
    in short:
    - around a bunch of terry patriots
    - parties, officials are just puppets, they are used in return, they receive unlimited power and access to bribes
    - the complete absence of any ideology, the liberal-consumer-patriotic-bourgeois paradigm is not an ideology, but simply something that has taken the place of a much-needed ideology !!


    As a result, it seems to me that the adoption and implementation of any laws, decrees, etc. ... will lead to nothing until we adopt any ideology and start from it.
  44. The comment was deleted.
  45. victor_47
    victor_47 2 February 2022 16: 27
    -1
    Actually there are two main problems:
    1) in the economy - the cessation of the uncontrolled export of capital;
    2) in politics - the exclusion from the political system of persons with dual or more citizenship, close relatives with foreign citizenship, as well as those who have property and accounts abroad.
  46. UltraRed
    UltraRed 9 February 2022 20: 43
    0
    Quote: ort
    These movements are the gradual replacement of Russians by other peoples and the exclusion from public life (and from life in general). As a people incapable of self-organization due to chronic NOT receptivity to any ideas or religions. (Whoever does not believe in anything is ready to pretend that he believed in everything. The day before yesterday - Christians, yesterday - atheists, today again Christians, the day before yesterday "God save the Tsar", yesterday "proletarians unite", today "proletarians - yes, you all go ...".

    1.) "Not capable of self-organization" somehow created one of the largest states on the planet.
    2.) Since the end of the XNUMXth century, the mass consciousness of developed countries has ceased to be traditional (according to Weber). And the ability to "believe" in society is not a sign of strength - but a sign of backwardness and counter-modernity.
    The Islamists or any fanatics will not build a capable society now.
    3.) Actually, I wrote about "class analysis", and not about "Russian-non-Russians" and other "faith"
    If you do not understand what is written, do not disgrace yourself and do not write anything.
  47. Vladimir27
    Vladimir27 17 February 2022 14: 52
    0
    Rather, the need for the development of Russian society ...
    Strange, there are proposals, but they are not heard ...