The United States warned Belarus about the response of the West for the attack on Ukraine from its territory

109

The United States warned Belarus of responsibility for using the territory of the republic to attack Ukraine. The corresponding statement was made by the official representative of the State Department, Ned Price.

The United States continues to escalate the situation around Ukraine, announcing the allegedly impending invasion of the Russian army. Another statement on this topic followed from the State Department, when the official representative of the department, Ned Price, "remembered" Belarus, neighboring Ukraine. According to Washington, Russia can use the territory of the republic to attack Ukraine, especially since there is now a concentration of Russian troops in Belarus.



The State Department decided to warn Minsk that in the event of an attack by Ukraine from the territory of the republic, a "quick and decisive" response would follow from the United States and its European partners. Answering the question of one of the journalists, what is hidden under this wording, Price explained that NATO will increase its military presence in the countries bordering Belarus.

In recent days, we have made it clear to Belarus that if it allows its territory to be used to attack Ukraine, it will face a swift and decisive response from the United States, our allies and partners.

- quotes the press service of the State Department of the words of Price.

Note that the main "accusers" of Russia are the United States and Great Britain, they are also the main suppliers of weapons to Ukraine. Accusing Moscow of preparing for an "invasion", Washington and London are using the situation to pump up Kiev weapons, solving their tasks aimed at weakening Russian positions. As Moscow has repeatedly stated, the United States does not need a strong Russia, since it prevents Washington from performing the functions of "the world's policeman."
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    109 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +17
      26 January 2022 09: 28
      The State Department decided to warn Minsk that in the event of an attack by Ukraine from the territory of the republic, a "quick and decisive" response would follow from the United States and its European partners.....
      ... like in Afghanistan.
      1. +10
        26 January 2022 09: 40
        And what will happen? Let me guess - “will they impose sanctions from hell against Belarus”?)) Have they already introduced)) or will they impose bans on bans?))
        The main "accusers of Russia" the United States and the United Kingdom are still those "fighters for peace")))
        1. +21
          26 January 2022 09: 46
          Quote: Anchorite
          Let me guess - "will they impose sanctions from hell against Belarus"?))
          everything is more prosaic ... they will send the 6th fleet to the shores of Belarus.
          1. +5
            26 January 2022 09: 57
            Well, this will only be possible if the Belarusian Navy on the border with Ukraine arranges provocations "in the name of Psaki")))
          2. +8
            26 January 2022 10: 33
            Quote: Aerodrome
            . send the 6th fleet to the shores of Belarus.

            You can't do this! All shrimp will be scared away! negative
            1. +5
              26 January 2022 10: 34
              Quote: Uncle Lee
              Quote: Aerodrome
              . send the 6th fleet to the shores of Belarus.

              You can't do this! All shrimp will be scared away! negative

              Zhenya Psaki, I don’t care about the problem of Belarusians.
              1. +5
                26 January 2022 10: 42
                Quote: Aerodrome
                Zhenya Psaki, don't care

                Greta! Ay! Chilimchikov offended! stop
                1. -1
                  27 January 2022 12: 26
                  Greetings, Vladimir! hi

                  The State Department is intimidating! Old Lukashenko must have huddled somewhere in a corner and is crying! laughing laughing laughing
          3. The comment was deleted.
          4. +2
            26 January 2022 11: 39
            It's time to impose sanctions against the United States for libel against Belarus and demand compensation
        2. +4
          26 January 2022 09: 48
          Quote: Anchorite
          The main "accusers of Russia" the United States and Britain are still those "fighters for peace"

          Fighters for world domination. The Britons still cannot forgive the world - "Rule, Britannia! Britannia, rule the waves:
          Britons never shall be slaves." But they learned to make others slaves.
          1. +22
            26 January 2022 09: 54
            I wonder who exactly they said this in Belarus winked Is it really the evil Alexander Grigorievich? ..... Or to Lithuania or wherever Tikhanovskaya is now telegraphed winked laughing .... In general, since Tikhanovskaya is the legitimate president of Belarus for the West, then, according to their logic, sanctions should be imposed against her laughing And then I look, she is completely relaxed, then the exercises are on the nose, troops from the Russian Federation are arriving in Belarus, but she is silent. The cutlets are fried. laughing
            1. +1
              26 January 2022 13: 36
              Quote: Black
              troops from the Russian Federation arrive in Belarus, but she is silent. The cutlets are fried.
              For some reason, it seems to me that Sveta the cutlet is now trembling with fear for herself and her children and dreams that everyone will forget about them. With all the limitations of her horizons, she cannot help but understand that the high stakes in this political-information game increase the market value of the picture with their corpses.
        3. +3
          26 January 2022 10: 30
          Quote: Anchorite
          The main "accusers of Russia" the United States and the United Kingdom are still those "fighters for peace")))

          But the main "fighter", USA

          1. 0
            26 January 2022 15: 55
            Sergey, welcome! Enlighten, please, but what about Brazil in 1964 - even somehow already lost ?! No sarcasm. For general education.
            1. 0
              27 January 2022 13: 33
              Here, for example, data from pediviki, which, as you know, are all anti-American, can’t even eat: “The military coup in Brazil (port. Golpe de estado no Brasil em 1964) is colloquially known in Brazil as Coup 64 (port. Golpe de 64) was a series of events in Brazil from March 31 to April 1 that led to the overthrow of President João Goulart by members of the Brazilian Armed Forces, backed by the United States government.The next day, with the military already in control of the country, the speaker of the Brazilian Congress spoke in support coup and supported it by declaring the presidency vacant (although Goulart never formally resigned.) The coup ended the government of Goulart (also known as "Django"), a member of the Brazilian Labor Party who was democratically elected vice president in the same election , on which the conservative Janio Cuadros, from the National Labor Party and with the support of the National Democratic Union, took the presidency ent.

              Quadros resigned in 1961, the year of his inauguration, in a clumsy political maneuver to boost his popularity. Cuadros expected that mass demonstrations would require him to return to office and strengthen his position, but he miscalculated. Due to the fact that the presidency was vacant and according to the Brazilian constitution, Quadros was to be automatically replaced by Goulart. However, Goulart was on a diplomatic trip to the People's Republic of China at the time, and although Goulart was a moderate nationalist, he was accused of being a communist by right-wing militants who tried to prevent him from taking office. After lengthy negotiations led by Tancredo Nevis, Goulart's supporters and the right came to an agreement that a parliamentary system would replace the presidential system in the country. Goulart will remain head of state, albeit weakened, and Nevis will be named prime minister.

              However, in 1963 a referendum restored the presidential system with Goulart as president. He took office with full power, and during his reign, several problems in Brazilian politics, as well as disputes in the context of the Cold War, became apparent, which helped to destabilize his government. The plan for major reforms (Reformas de Base) proposed by Goulart had the potential to socialize the profits of large companies. It was called the "socialist threat" by right-wing sections of society and the military, who organized large demonstrations against the government in the March of the Family with God for Freedom (Marchas da Família com Deus pela Liberdade).

              The coup brought Brazil a military regime politically aligned with the interests of the United States government. This military dictatorship in Brazil lasted 21 years, until 1985, when Nevis was indirectly elected as Brazil's first civilian president after the 1960 elections." laughing hi
      2. -2
        26 January 2022 10: 14
        Quote: tihonmarine
        The State Department decided to warn Minsk that in the event of an attack by Ukraine from the territory of the republic, a "quick and decisive" response would follow from the United States and its European partners.....
        ... like in Afghanistan.

        With the same result
      3. +1
        26 January 2022 15: 20
        The State Department forgot about the ravines... In the sense of the Union State + CSTO + SCO.
        If anyone dares to offend our brother, Belarus, then the United States and its European slaves will receive a "quick and decisive" answer from his brother / brothers!
    2. 0
      26 January 2022 09: 28
      Where is our Foreign Ministry? why is silent? only Americans Americans Americans. The whole world was intimidated. Who delivered an ultimatum to whom is not clear. We only deny Zakharova's statements and that's it. It seems that the Americans were just waiting for our pseudo-ultimatum.
      1. -1
        26 January 2022 09: 34
        And for this they secretly answer, they will fulfill all the conditions of Russia. And external militancy to save face. Well, the weapons are thrown off like the last time, and not for free.
        1. +1
          26 January 2022 10: 41
          And what conditions do they fulfill exactly?
          1. +1
            26 January 2022 14: 50
            Why keep the answer secret? Nata is cooler than boiled eggs.
            1. -1
              26 January 2022 15: 53
              This is not an answer to my question. So what exactly are the conditions NATO fulfills?
      2. +13
        26 January 2022 09: 37
        And our Foreign Ministry is waiting for answers to the questions posed. Why race ahead of time.
        1. +1
          26 January 2022 10: 06
          Why race ahead of time

          we are waiting for a surprise - the new "Bogdan Khmelnitsky" is coming soon
      3. -21
        26 January 2022 09: 38
        the Americans are already openly threatening Putin, and our Foreign Ministry is only mumbling indistinctly, what kind of Belarus is there
        1. +15
          26 January 2022 09: 45
          Quote: Sergei Zabelin
          the Americans are already openly threatening Putin, and our Foreign Ministry is only mumbling indistinctly, what kind of Belarus is there

          or Belarus in Russian
          or Belarus in Belarusian

          what exactly is incomprehensible to you in the "indistinct lowing" of the Russian Foreign Ministry?
          what phrase of Lavrov requires explanation?
          1. 0
            26 January 2022 09: 48
            Quote: Flood
            Quote: Sergei Zabelin
            the Americans are already openly threatening Putin, and our Foreign Ministry is only mumbling indistinctly, what kind of Belarus is there

            or Belarus in Russian
            or Belarus in Belarusian

            what exactly is incomprehensible to you in the "indistinct lowing" of the Russian Foreign Ministry?
            what phrase of Lavrov requires explanation?

            and so, and so right. out of respect, I call Belarus.
            1. +3
              26 January 2022 09: 49
              Quote: Aerodrome
              and so, and so right. out of respect, I call Belarus.

              I'm talking about writing "Belarus"
              if you haven't noticed
              1. +2
                26 January 2022 11: 37
                Quote: Flood
                Quote: Aerodrome
                and so, and so right. out of respect, I call Belarus.

                I'm talking about writing "Belarus"
                if you haven't noticed

                I'm blind.. sorry.
          2. The comment was deleted.
            1. +1
              26 January 2022 10: 06
              Quote: Sergei Zabelin
              read here to get started

              read your link first


              ready to continue
              do you have anything to add about "Belarus"?
              1. -6
                26 January 2022 10: 12
                Answer of representatives of the Vinogradov Russian Language Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences

                “Both names - “Belarus” and “Belarus” - have the right to exist in the modern Russian literary language. “Belarus”, along with the name “Republic of Belarus”, is the official name of the state, recorded in diplomatic documents in Russian, the document says. - In all official situations and official texts, it is possible to recommend using just such options. "Belarus" is an informal name. It is used mainly in the everyday sphere of communication, and native speakers of the Russian language have the right to use it in appropriate situations.
                1. +2
                  26 January 2022 10: 16
                  Quote: Sergei Zabelin
                  Both names - "Belarus" and "Belarus" - have the right to exist in the modern Russian literary language.

                  excuse me, did you carefully read what I wrote?
                  Quote: Sergei Zabelin
                  what is it here Belarus


                  Quote: Flood
                  or Belarus in Russian
                  or Belarus in Belarusian
                  1. -1
                    26 January 2022 10: 21
                    Damn, you're talking about a spelling mistake, sorry, I just noticed, of course Belarus
                    1. +4
                      26 January 2022 10: 23
                      Here you go. And then we lit an argument from scratch with you))
                      Good day!
                      1. -1
                        26 January 2022 10: 24
                        And good to you
                2. -1
                  26 January 2022 15: 16
                  On the outskirts, don't say, BelO - don't say, it's not tolerant!
                  Russians are always afraid of offending someone, they are afraid to speak their Russian language correctly !!!, and then they are surprised that they are not respected and even with nuclear missiles they are not afraid.
                  Who will respect you, if you don’t even respect your own language, but try to please everyone, please everyone, make friends with everyone.
                  From the outside, this is perceived as weakness and cowardice.
              2. -1
                26 January 2022 10: 39
                Quote: Flood
                ready to continue
                do you have anything to add about "Belarus"?

                This Wikipedia is already in the liver to read it.
            2. +1
              26 January 2022 10: 30
              Quote: Sergei Zabelin
              ws-wiz read here to get started

              Thank you for an interesting article, or rather your comment. Now please decipher these signs. No offense.
              1. -1
                26 January 2022 10: 34
                highlight all these signs and go to
                1. -1
                  26 January 2022 10: 59
                  Quote: Sergei Zabelin
                  highlight all these signs and go to

                  Yes Yes, I understood that Wikipedia.
        2. -2
          26 January 2022 10: 34
          Quote: Sergei Zabelin
          and our Foreign Ministry only mumbles indistinctly

          Well, where did you see this "mooing"?
          Lavrov has already said that it is useless to negotiate with America
          1. -1
            26 January 2022 10: 47
            Whoever requires Lavrov to negotiate with the Americans must respond to threats to the country's top leadership, this is his job
            1. -1
              26 January 2022 11: 10
              Quote: Sergei Zabelin
              Whoever requires Lavrov to negotiate with the Americans must respond to threats to the country's top leadership, this is his job

              Lavrov as Minister of Foreign Affairs and voices the position of the country's top leadership
      4. +11
        26 January 2022 09: 38
        Quote: DenisI
        It seems that the Americans were just waiting for our pseudo-ultimatum.

        Do you think the United States outplayed Russia in the diplomatic field?
        or delay with the conclusions?

        When diplomacy falls silent, guns begin to speak

        Thank God it hasn't come to that yet.
        International diplomacy has a vast backstage.
        We see only her small public spot in the spotlight.
        1. +2
          26 January 2022 09: 49
          Quote: Flood
          When diplomacy falls silent, guns begin to speak

          Why are the Anglo-Saxons going so confidently, like a guy from Braunau in 1935.
          1. +4
            26 January 2022 10: 03
            Quote: tihonmarine
            Why are the Anglo-Saxons so confident and go

            you meant to write "push"
            1. +2
              26 January 2022 10: 07
              Quote: Flood
              you meant to write "push"

              Rather, they pull behind them, and as always, "On the attack, and we will follow you in the trenches!"
              1. +2
                26 January 2022 10: 12
                Quote: tihonmarine
                Rather, they pull behind them, and as always, "On the attack, and we will follow you in the trenches!"

                I remembered the fabulous animal about the two heads of Pushing the unforgettable Korney Ivanovich.
            2. -1
              26 January 2022 10: 38
              Quote: Flood
              you meant to write "push"

              To the war to the last outskirts
            3. +1
              26 January 2022 10: 51
              He wrote correctly. They go ahead. Look at the political map of a NATO country, compare it with the same one, but 80 years old. Bulldozer rod.
              1. +2
                26 January 2022 10: 58
                Quote: YOUR
                He wrote correctly. They go ahead. Look at the political map of a NATO country

                I see that Romanians, Poles, Balts are at the forefront of NATO

                definitely not shaved with the Americans
                they follow an island security strategy
                1. +1
                  26 January 2022 11: 01
                  Exactly. Why expose yourself if there are such. At one time, we also covered them - the Warsaw Pact. Their fate is to be a layer
                  1. +1
                    26 January 2022 11: 38
                    Quote: YOUR
                    At one time, we also covered them - Warsaw Pact

                    covered by the Poles and Romanians?
                    sent out to the slaughterhouse instead of themselves?
                    what are you writing?
                    1. +1
                      26 January 2022 14: 54
                      We fought with someone at this time?
                      No.
                      And they covered us with their territory. If it happens, you still need to get to the borders of the USSR. Now NATO troops are on the border with Russia. Who knows, maybe it’s necessary, just a multi-move stretched out in time.
                      1. 0
                        26 January 2022 16: 20
                        Quote: YOUR
                        And they covered us with their territory.

                        it's a buffer zone
                        the USSR was covered not by neighboring states, but by the SA and the Navy
                        I'm just talking about your terminology
                        what do you mean i understand
                        but you are not clear
                        no offense
          2. 0
            26 January 2022 10: 53
            Because there is no answer.
            Someone will unleash a nuclear war? Yes, fig
            Someone can influence economically? Oh, don't make fun of my slippers.
            So what are they afraid of?
        2. +1
          26 January 2022 13: 37
          Exactly. And we can only guess about what is hidden behind the scenes. And only time will tell how correct our guesses were.
      5. +12
        26 January 2022 09: 41
        Quote: DenisI
        Where is our Foreign Ministry? Why is silent?

        And our Foreign Ministry has long said everything, which is why the S-400, Su-35 and Su-30 arrive in Belarus, and also, oddly enough, marines from the Pacific Fleet! And endlessly practicing rhetoric with the State Department - there is no sense, p.i.n.d.o.s.s can chat up any problem not a millimeter without approaching its solution!
        1. 0
          26 January 2022 10: 45
          And something else surprises me. If Su30 and S400 this is understandable. Then why is there a Su35 without a Su34? Over whom are they going to provide superiority? Or for the sake of non-injection ... Su34 and Tu22 will catch up at the last moment? Then the cover in the form of Su35 makes sense.
          1. +8
            26 January 2022 10: 59
            Quote: Rusticolus
            Tu22 catch up at the last moment?

            Do not know. We have not seen the Tu-22 for a long time, since the late 80s. And today I heard a familiar sound, went out to look. Here they are, gray-winged pigeons.
            1. 0
              26 January 2022 14: 05
              Quote: NDR-791
              Do not know. We have not seen the Tu-22 for a long time, since the late 80s. And today I heard a familiar sound, went out to look. Here they are, gray-winged pigeons.

              Machulishchi?
      6. -3
        26 January 2022 11: 10
        Now fresh concerns will be brought to the Foreign Ministry and Maria's voice will wake up.
    3. 0
      26 January 2022 09: 33
      Do they threaten Belarus during the escalation in the Donbass? Is this when the banderlogs go to kill the inhabitants of Donbass? They will gather along the borders and will observe through binoculars - What is going on there? They will watch what Russia will do with the creatures in this case.
    4. +5
      26 January 2022 09: 34
      Price explained that NATO will increase its military presence in countries bordering Belarus.

      There and so that presence, like feces in the toilet for the railway station. Only now they are supposedly against Russia only. So the Belarusians will not lose much.
    5. +3
      26 January 2022 09: 34
      In recent days, we have made it clear to Belarus that if it allows its territory to be used to attack Ukraine, it will face a swift and decisive response from the United States, our allies and partners.

      - quotes the press service of the State Department of the words of Price.
      Merikatos looked like an old, mangy rooster in a chicken coop. There is no sense from him anymore; no soup, no chickens trample. Only one thing can - crow in the morning, if you do not oversleep.
    6. -4
      26 January 2022 09: 35
      The United States warned Belarus about the response of the West for the attack on Ukraine from its territory

      It is unlikely that Lukashenka will agree to this. He still supplies electricity to Ukraine.
      1. -6
        26 January 2022 09: 50
        Quote: riwas
        The United States warned Belarus about the response of the West for the attack on Ukraine from its territory

        It is unlikely that Lukashenka will agree to this. He still supplies electricity to Ukraine.

        and RF- solarium to the states ... how do you like it?
    7. 0
      26 January 2022 09: 35
      The old man was so frightened that he ordered our paratroopers to carry out military operations together with the Belarusians on the border territory. There is nothing to sit idle until February 10.
    8. +3
      26 January 2022 09: 41
      The United States has warned Belarus...
      Who has not yet been warned by the United States? Was Ukraine warned not to try to rock the boat in the Donbass? Or is it different? Naturally, they did not forget their duty and greasy
      will face a swift and decisive response from the United States, our allies and partners
      Now that the “invasion” has not taken place yet again, it can be said with a proudly raised head that the American warnings played a major role in the de-escalation.
      1. +1
        26 January 2022 10: 48
        Quote: rotmistr60
        Now that the “invasion” has not taken place yet again, it can be said with a proudly raised head that the American warnings played a major role in the de-escalation.

        Yeah, the US is the dove of peace. "If a crazy person is about to jump off a roof, you can't stop him, but you can help him fall."
    9. +2
      26 January 2022 09: 42
      The State Department decided to warn Minsk that in the event of an attack by Ukraine from the territory of the republic, a "quick and decisive" response from the United States would follow

      ***
      Again they want to send a fleet to the shores of Belarus ...
      ***
      1. +3
        26 January 2022 09: 51
        Quote: Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov
        The State Department decided to warn Minsk that in the event of an attack by Ukraine from the territory of the republic, a "quick and decisive" response from the United States would follow

        ***
        Again they want to send a fleet to the shores of Belarus ...
        ***

        not they, in revenge on the Belarusians, will hang a couple of three thousand of their soldiers around the necks of the Poles and Lithuania ....
        L-logic...
    10. +1
      26 January 2022 09: 44
      Is it possible that the light-cutlet is recognized as the "legally elected president of Belarus"? And then sanctions on Lukashenka are like fleas on a stray dog. One more, one less.
    11. +5
      26 January 2022 09: 49
      the United States is already like the Baltic "tigers" every day they threaten someone with "quick and decisive measures" ...
      like a foolish little dog on a leash - barking, barking, barking ... already foaming from its mouth, already wheezing, almost strangled itself - but cannot stop ... and strangle itself from its anger ...
      the most interesting thing is that no one pays attention to the distraught mongrel - everyone is silent, without shouting and yelling, doing their job ...
    12. lot
      0
      26 January 2022 09: 57
      Belarusians will forcibly land NATO planes.
      and transit missiles.
      there is experience. The Foreign Ministry must state this unambiguously.
    13. HAM
      +5
      26 January 2022 10: 01
      The more they talk about the "quick and decisive answer", the more this "answer" looks like a tantrum of an unsatisfied woman ....
    14. +4
      26 January 2022 10: 05
      Lots of oddities. Russia keeps saying that it is not going to attack Ukraine. Even in Ukraine they sometimes talk about it. But the West is persistently talking about possible sanctions. There are two reasons. the most harmless: gaining "points": Russia will not attack and the US and NATO will declare that they managed to scare Putin - that's how strong and terrible they are. Another, more serious: after all, they decided to drive the Ukrainians to slaughter in the Donbass and warn Russia - if it tries to intervene and stand up for its citizens, of which there are many, they will declare it an aggressor.
    15. VLR
      +3
      26 January 2022 10: 25
      Meanwhile, in Ukraine, the president of Croatia has already been added to the Peacemaker database. And they demand from this country an apology on their knees and almost reparations. The degree of inadequacy is growing, but, interestingly, all these insults are still being swallowed in Europe. However, the "residue", of course, remains: everything
      and remember everything. Sooner or later, Ukraine will have to answer for these stupid provocateurs. It is strange that the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry and the Zelensky administration do not understand this. Such, apparently, is the level of competence and intelligence.
    16. +1
      26 January 2022 10: 26
      The United States warned Belarus about the response of the West for the attack on Ukraine from its territory
      All in one information flow, the same threats .... nothing to discuss here / there!
      1. +3
        26 January 2022 10: 36
        Good time! hi

        But they don’t know how, and they don’t want to do it differently ...
        1. +2
          26 January 2022 10: 43
          They keep the agenda they need in the information space ...
          1. +2
            26 January 2022 11: 43
            Yes, at the same time, trying to chat up all our proposals ...
            1. +1
              26 January 2022 12: 17
              They take time, suddenly it will resolve itself.
              Problems, now, everyone has ... volumes and criticality are different for everyone.
              1. +2
                26 January 2022 12: 23
                Well, yes, like that girl who for the first time ...
    17. +2
      26 January 2022 10: 35
      As Moscow has repeatedly stated, the United States does not need a strong Russia, since it prevents Washington from performing the functions of "the world's policeman."


      Russia did not interfere for almost 30 years, and then they realized that not much more and Russia would be crushed ...
      1. +5
        26 January 2022 10: 46
        We don’t even need the current world order, led by minke whales, and it’s sprawling at the seams.
        To participate in its destruction is a good thing, in all respects.
        1. +3
          26 January 2022 11: 44
          Yes, everyone sees this, except for the United States itself, but this usually happens ...
          1. +2
            26 January 2022 12: 33
            And they see, BUT, there is no simple solution, so they will jump around, saying that they have it all the way ... and trying to provide problems for everyone around, which looks better themselves.
            1. +2
              26 January 2022 13: 10
              See? of course they see, but they were removed or dismissed and continue to inflate hysteria ...
              1. +1
                26 January 2022 15: 52
                If you figure it out, their life, circumstances will force them to act differently ... maybe not in the lead, but the process of finding solutions to problems is underway.
                1. +2
                  26 January 2022 17: 16
                  Smart specialists work and look for options, and politicians decide for the sake of this or that moment ...
                  1. +1
                    26 January 2022 18: 59
                    Politicians can also be fried specifically, and this contributes to the work of the brain in the right direction ... for the majority, of course, frostbitten can not fix anything ... except perhaps the guillotine.
                    1. +2
                      26 January 2022 19: 17
                      It looks like it’s already fried and not childish, so they’re spinning ...
                      1. +1
                        26 January 2022 19: 45
                        After all, it’s simple, statistics for various fields of activity and areas! And who, she, is now favorable ???
                        So they think, they scratch their heads ... you can say different things, but the facts, the facts are Karl!
                        1. +3
                          26 January 2022 20: 37
                          It was possible to draw any facts for a picture, but it doesn’t work for actions ...
    18. 0
      26 January 2022 11: 06
      Quote: Aerodrome
      Quote: Anchorite
      Let me guess - "will they impose sanctions from hell against Belarus"?))
      everything is more prosaic ... they will send the 6th fleet to the shores of Belarus.

      our submarines have already come out to meet them
    19. +1
      26 January 2022 11: 08
      Belarus, of course, will answer, but only after those countries that have deployed American bases near the Russian and Belarusian borders answer
    20. -2
      26 January 2022 11: 16
      Why is there no answer from our Foreign Ministry and the Belarusian Foreign Ministry? Why can not put in place presumptuous boors? Fearfully? Then why was all this cheese boron raised? It's disgusting, oh no!
    21. The comment was deleted.
    22. -3
      26 January 2022 11: 35
      Forget about Ukraine! The Americans are deliberately fanning the hysteria around the "imminent invasion" in order to hit the Nord Stream. And you only contribute to this for the hundredth time by relaying this nonsense. Forget!
    23. -1
      26 January 2022 12: 03
      Americans always and everyone love to "warn". As the events in Afghanistan have shown, these "warnings" are worth a penny. The Taliban still drive American jeeps and carry American weapons. God forbid, of course, but time will pass and the airport of Kiev - "Borispol" will resemble the airport of Kabul. But it’s easier for harovars and raguls. There are also Zhuliany in Kiev.
    24. +7
      26 January 2022 13: 29
      Come on, tsits there, otherwise I’ll turn off the gas, ”the AHL answered.
    25. +2
      26 January 2022 13: 50
      There is a vowel line, there is an unspoken line. And sometimes there is such a big difference between them that one contradicts the other. Forcing hysteria around Ukraine is a public line, all the unspoken ones clear their throats at "negotiations behind closed doors." And there everything is already decided. The acting parties are familiarized with their roles, and during "H", each will play his part. And the vowel part for the electorate - look, they say, what good fellows we are, we would fight (yeah, statements in the press). Therefore, the Russian Foreign Ministry does not respond to these passages (because they know that they are in public).
      We can only observe the development of the situation (although for me these are open secrets).
      And by the way:
      An attack on a CSTO member country will entail an armed response from the rest of the participating countries, so no one will rock the boat.
    26. -4
      26 January 2022 14: 10
      The United States warned Belarus of responsibility

      Listening to those who have no idea about responsibility at all is an extremely stupid and hopeless business. Anyone who does this will make a fatal mistake that can no longer be corrected.
    27. 0
      26 January 2022 15: 49
      Quote: Aerodrome
      Quote: Anchorite
      Let me guess - "will they impose sanctions from hell against Belarus"?))
      everything is more prosaic ... they will send the 6th fleet to the shores of Belarus.

      And aviation through the Rostov mountains
    28. +2
      26 January 2022 15: 54
      Quote: grassyknollgunner
      Forget about Ukraine! The Americans are deliberately fanning the hysteria around the "imminent invasion" in order to hit the Nord Stream. And you only contribute to this for the hundredth time by relaying this nonsense. Forget!

      And what is the flow? In principle, the nested grandmas in the stream are beaten off three times. Now it will be purple or not. If not, then nishtyak. This means that Aurora is an intractable side and new "streams" in the European theater of operations can definitely not be done. Use gas from Qatar and SGA. Asia is preferred. Pakistan wants a pipe. India wants a couple. China does not mind a few pieces. In these countries, consumption is growing by leaps and bounds. The pipe is stupidly cheaper than LNG.
    29. 0
      26 January 2022 15: 57
      Quote: Ramon Merkader
      There is a vowel line, there is an unspoken line. And sometimes there is such a big difference between them that one contradicts the other. Forcing hysteria around Ukraine is a public line, all the unspoken ones clear their throats at "negotiations behind closed doors." And there everything is already decided. The acting parties are familiarized with their roles, and during "H", each will play his part. And the vowel part for the electorate - look, they say, what good fellows we are, we would fight (yeah, statements in the press). Therefore, the Russian Foreign Ministry does not respond to these passages (because they know that they are in public).
      We can only observe the development of the situation (although for me these are open secrets).
      And by the way:
      An attack on a CSTO member country will entail an armed response from the rest of the participating countries, so no one will rock the boat.

      Yeah. Only if you play too hard, then it will be impossible to reduce the "vowels" and "tacit" lines to a common denominator. Those. to the benefit of "line builders" because they will be mutually exclusive...
      1. -1
        26 January 2022 20: 14
        And they do not need to be reduced to a single denominator. Questions on benefits are just solved by tacit agreements. And the vowels either cover them or legitimize them (depending on the situation).
    30. +1
      26 January 2022 16: 16
      "If the Russian Federation attacks Ukraine from your territory, then in response we will increase NATO forces in Poland by a hundred people."
      Excellent!
      Now explain how this can stop the Russian Federation if it actually decides to invade Ukraine from Belarus?
      And how will Lukashenka stop it?
      Does the West really think that some kind of sanctions can change something? But this is nonsense. No sanctions have achieved anything. Not against Iran, not against Cuba, not against the UK.
      And even more so against the Russian Federation, they will never change anything.
    31. -1
      27 January 2022 13: 28
      Syshya and their allies are obliged to urgently introduce the most stringent sanctions against the "people's" prezero ... sorry, president Sveta-cutlets! After all, Lukashenka refused to recognize the "collective West". laughing

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"