The country that could shoot down the SR-71

59

It was under this heading This Country Almost Shot Down the SR-71 Blackbird that an article appeared in The National Interest, widely known in narrow circles, and caught my eye.

To my great surprise, it turned out that this country was not even the USSR at all, but Sweden.



TNI, in turn, politely referred to several sources, and eventually I came across several books by one Paul Crickmor, who seemed to have researched quite thoroughly history creation and use of this amazing aircraft.

All books are offered on Amazon for $30-$35, but we're not that generous and the internet is such a thing...

In general, as a result, I can report the following.

difficult target


In the 1980s, at the height of the Cold War, Swedish pilots flew 400-500 times a year to intercept unidentified aircraft. The country was neutral, it was true, but it really did not like it when someone - no matter who - approached its borders.

Such encroachments occurred both from the Warsaw Pact countries and from the NATO countries, and the SR-71 was the most difficult target for the Swedish pilots.

At that time, this machine regularly, once a week, flew along the route of the so-called "Baltic Express", and the Swedes could not help but take this opportunity to train and gain experience in intercepting ultra-fast and super-high targets.

Since the Drozd tried not to cross anyone's borders without obvious need, its route, among other things, ran through a narrow corridor of neutral space between the islands of Gotland and Oland, and it was there that the Swedish pilots tried to intercept it over and over again. Of course, in jest.

The country that could shoot down the SR-71

For the time being, at best, they could only notice a dark dot that flickered in the distance. But in 1981, the JA37 Viggen fighter, which was then in service with the Swedish Air Force, received a new radar and a new guidance system.


Based on the updated capabilities of the aircraft, a new interception strategy was developed, which we would call a frontal attack.

To go from the tail, of course, one could not even dream of. The fighter had to take off in advance, gain a suitable height, lie down on a course that was indicated to it from the ground, accelerate to a speed of Mach 2 and make a slide that lifts it to approximately the same height and head-on with the SR-71.

After that, he had about two seconds left for the Skyflash missile, which was in service with the JA-37, to capture the shadow rushing towards him with its radar.

This is if everything goes according to plan, and if the target does not turn away ...

Here is how former guidance radar operator Rolf Jonsson puts it (source: Paul F Crickmore. Lockheed SR-71 Operations in Europe and the Middle East):

“The most remarkable event happened every week when the SR-71 appeared in the Baltic.
It was also the biggest disappointment, because no matter how hard our pilots tried to achieve the desired height and speed, all they could do was see a small dot flickering in the distance.
The only way to succeed was a frontal attack.
We could predict the arrival of SR-71 about an hour before it was physically within our reach. They always entered the Baltic Sea at the same point, codenamed Kodon, located 80 km south of Copenhagen, and on a course of about 90 degrees.
The usual reaction to this was to launch a pair of JA-37 interceptors that were on duty at the bases of Angholm, Ronneby or Norrköpping. The best point was the Ronneby base, since it was located 50 km southeast of Gotland.
The Baltic route SR-71 was the same.
He always remained in the international space, and first he went around the coast of Poland and the Kaliningrad region, and then laid down on a course of 15 degrees.
We often saw on the radar how the Su-15 and MiG-23 rose to intercept it in this zone, but I strongly doubt that the attempts were successful. At least they looked harmless on screen.
It then proceeded to a point about 60 km west of the island of Saaremaa and from there made a long gentle turn to the left, which brought it to a course of about 190. It then passed between the islands of Gotland and Oland, and this always impressed us, since the between the islands was only 2 miles wide.
This is where our pilots trained.
Once 75 km southeast of the coast, SR-71 turned 235 degrees and left the Baltic Sea at the same point through which it entered.
The whole loop counter-clockwise took about 30 minutes.”

The Swedes and Drozd


Now the word is given to the pilot who made the first successful interception for the Swedish Air Force, and this will be JA-37 pilot Per-Olof Eldh, now a retired lieutenant colonel.

Here's how he describes it:

“In the 80s, I served with the 2nd Blue Marlins Squadron, 13th Fighter Wing, at Bravalla Base.
We already had a digital communication link with the Air Defense Center, the next task was to establish it between fighters, which we did in 1981. By combining it with the PS46 Doppler radar and Skyflash missiles, the Viggen JA37 fighter received significantly improved capabilities.
On the multifunctional display, along with a map of the area, the pilot could see friendly and alien aircraft, the positions of anti-aircraft missiles and much more, and the information was constantly updated, both from the ground flight control service and from other aircraft.
When I succeeded in the first interception of the SR-71 in the Swedish Air Force, our target was already returning from overflying the Soviet borders and was on a course that would bring it into the gap between the islands of Gotland and Oland.
On instructions from the ground, I took a position that would lead me to the target at an angle of 180 degrees.
At an altitude of 8 m I accelerated to Mach 000, then gradually up to M1,3 and reached a flight level between 2 and 18 meters. All parameters were on my display.
The target acquisition radar operated at maximum range and immediately acquired the target, and I made a conditional launch of the missiles.
SR-71 was at an altitude of 21, moving at a speed of 500 M.
The closing speed was incredibly high, somewhere between 4,5–5 M.
I also spotted it visually.
In general, I had five successful interceptions.
In January 1986, I was the flight leader, we received data on the interception immediately after takeoff, and all three of us were able to make a conditional launch.

Now back to the previous speaker, as he recalls something interesting:

“Almost every time the SR-71 was already heading for the exit point, a lone MiG-25PD took off from the Finow-Eberswalde airfield in East Germany.
The SR-71 approached the exit point at 21, and this MiG often ended up behind it at 900, in a left turn and at a distance of about 19 miles.
After that, he completed the turn, descended and left for his airfield.
It may very well be that he simulated an attack from the rear hemisphere.

Paul Crickmore continues:

“It is very interesting that, judging by the memoirs of Rolf, the attack of this single MiG always ended at the same height and distance.
It may very well be that these were the parameters for a confident capture of the target, and it is possible that the MiG would have fired its missiles if such a command had been given to it.

After reading all this, I remembered that somewhere I once saw references to the interception of the Blackbird by our pilots, but it was in the north.

For a couple of days I rummaged around the net, somewhat perplexed why such an event was not mentioned anywhere. It seems like all the secret prescriptions should have already passed?

And finally found.

I found a very detailed description of how it all happened, and it turned out to be - where would you think?

Again in a book by the same author.

Here it is: Crickmore Paul F. Lockheed Bblackbird: Beyond The Secret Missions.

It contains the memoirs of the MiG-31 pilot of the Guards, retired Major Mikhail Myagky. How they got there is not entirely clear.

The book contains a link to a certain Russian military aviation writer Valery Romanenko, who provided the author with an interview with the major, but a request to Yandex about such a writer did not give anything.

However, before proceeding to them, let's first finish with the epic SR-71 in the Baltic.

The memoirs of the Swedes mention that the Drozd once nevertheless violated their airspace, and this is how it happened.

Recalls retired Lieutenant Colonel Tom Veltri, who at that time was the co-pilot of the SR-71, or rather, the reconnaissance equipment operator (RSO).

“We had just completed our run along the Lithuanian, Latvian and Estonian coasts and were seconds away from turning onto a new course that would take us away from the Soviet coast. I counted the seconds, because if the autopilot fails, then we will have to turn manually, otherwise we will almost instantly find ourselves violating the border.
I counted 5… 4… 3, and on this count our right engine exploded.
We had to drastically reduce speed, otherwise a strong flow of oncoming air at supersonic speed would hit the compressor of the left engine, which would cause a decrease in power and the rudders would become ineffective.
On one engine, we couldn't do 3 M, which dramatically increased fuel consumption, and there was another problem: the explosion caused both generators to shut down, this caused a decrease in pressure in the cabins, and our suits inflated to compensate for this.
As a result, we could barely move. The plane sank 40 feet and leveled off there.
The suits deflated, we felt better, and we decided to head for Gotland, where we could land.
In addition, we hoped that the Swedes would certainly treat us better than the Russians. We also decided to include a transponder to get the attention of the Swedes.
Although this would also certainly have attracted the attention of the Russians, but still I think that it was the best decision that day.
We dropped to 25 feet and slowed down to 000 knots, hoping to get to the nearest airfield.
We would have run out of fuel before Mildenhall in England, and the air tanker would not have made it in time.
Then we saw two points approaching from the left, that is, exactly from the side where the Soviet territory was. We decided that if we notice the launch of missiles, we will immediately eject.
Not the best plan, but there wasn't much choice.
But as the dots got closer, we realized that they were Swedish fighters.”

The Swedish pilots, as we already know, were well aware of the Baltic Express schedule, and they were just getting ready for the next training session when they received a message that the SR-71 had unexpectedly violated their airspace, and at low altitude and low speed.

The pilots recall that there was definitely a disturbing note in the voice of the operator. They were ordered to look into the situation and find out if Drozd poses a threat. They immediately switched to supersonic and rushed to the target.

“Suddenly the SR-71 appeared out of the clouds and it was flying slowly and low.
We knew right away that something was wrong with him.
As we approached, we noted that one of its two engines was not working.
We decided to accompany him, mainly so that if the pilots decided to jump, then we could mark this place.

One of the Swedish pilots took a picture:


The book suggests looking at the ejector nozzle of the damaged right engine, but personally I don't see anything there... alas.

Soon the Swedes began to run out of fuel, and they were replaced by another pair.

Finally, the damaged Drozd was brought to Danish territory, where they were already met by American F-15s.

Now again the word to the American pilots:

“Although we were escorted to friendly territory, the worst was yet to come.
We did not have enough fuel before our base in England, and we were forced to land at the Nordholtz airfield in West Germany.
The explosion of the engine took away our hydraulic reserves, which meant no brakes and no ability to steer.
By the time we arrived, the base had blocked all roads in the vicinity, fearing that we would roll out of the airfield.
Fortunately for everyone, there was some residual fluid in the hydraulic system, which was enough for a single operation of the brakes.
We stopped a few meters from the end of the lane.”

In November 2018, the US government awarded four former pilots with a medal.


There are only three Swedish pilots in the picture, but everything is fine with the fourth one - he is on an expedition in Canada (ha ha) and participates in the award ceremony remotely, via video link.

Soft. Interception


Now back to the Soviet Far North and Major M. Myagky, who made 1984 successful SR-1987 interceptions between 14 and 71.

Exactly the same text, almost word for word, can be found on the pages of theaviationgeekclub.com, so I don’t know who should be given priority here. I also cannot say why the major's memoirs appeared in the English-language press, and not here. I hope I just didn't find them.

The major, and then still a captain, had previously flown Su-9 and MiG-23, flew 600 hours, was selected for retraining on the MiG-31, and in October 1983 arrived at the 174th GIAP in Monchegorsk. The regiment had already flown the MiG-18 for 31 months and often tried to intercept the SR-71.

A month later, Myagky was sent to the Combat Training Center at the Savasleika airbase, where retraining took place. In July of the following year, he already took up combat duty.

He made his first flight against the SR-71 on August 21, 1984.

According to his recollections, the speed and altitude at which the Drozdy flew simply mesmerized everyone, and the successful interception of the impudent was the highest priority not only for the regiment, but for the entire 10th Air Defense Army.

The signal about the imminent appearance of the SR-71 was given by the guidance station on the Rybachy Peninsula, and the interceptors took off from all airfields where the weather allowed. The zone of responsibility of the 174th regiment was the border sector from Kharlovka to Cape Svyatoy Nos.

Exactly 16 minutes had to pass from the moment of the alarm to the command to take off, of which 2 minutes were allotted for dressing, 2 minutes to run to the plane, sit down and buckle up, and the remaining time to check instruments and taxi to the start.

Technicians first ran to the plane and removed the P60 missiles, since at speeds over 1,75 Mach they would still be blocked.

Preparations for the flight began immediately two crews. Everything had to be done quickly and accurately.

For example, if the ground power plug was pulled out sharply, the navigation system could fail. The crew that reported readiness first will be the first to take off, and the second will be a spare.

The interception scheme was worked out to the second, and the slightest delay threatened with great consequences. During this 16-minute period, the guidance station had already determined which route the SR-71 would follow: forward or reverse.

During the flight to intercept Drozd, many established rules were violated.

For example, the takeoff was made in a northerly direction, although they usually took off in the opposite direction. Some restrictions were removed: the transition to supersonic took place at 8 m instead of 000.

Information about the possible imminent appearance of the SR-71 came from the radio interception service, which listened to the conversations of the tanker crews. If a tanker appeared off the Norwegian coast, this meant that the spy had been in the air for three hours.

The interception took place using only the infrared guidance channel using the OMV - a “multifunctional optical direction finder”, which was hidden in the fuselage in the non-working position. He could detect the SR-71 at a distance of up to 120 km, thanks to the thermal radiation of its engines, and gave target designation to the guidance system. And most importantly - he worked in a passive mode, and the onboard MiG locator did not turn on.

Here is what the major tells about the eighth interception, which he remembered for the fact that he not only caught the bird in the scope, but was also able to examine it.


“On January 31, 1986, I took up combat duty.
At about 11:00 a signal was received to take off to intercept the SR-71.
First a shrill bell rang, and then an announcement over the loudspeaker.
The appearance of the SR-71 was always accompanied by nervousness, everyone began to run, fuss and react too emotionally.
I ran to put on my helmet and flight jacket with a harness, and then ran 60 m to the plane.
On that day, I did not fly with my usual weapon operator, but with Alexei Parshin, the squadron operator.
When I sat down in the chair and buckled up, the navigation system's ready lights were already on. I pressed the engine start button, reported readiness to the command post and immediately received instructions to taxi to the starting position.
We stayed there for about five minutes, and my operator "recited a prayer" - as we called the pre-flight checklist.
After the command to take off, we turned on the afterburner and took off.
Takeoff speed was 360 km / h. Without turning off the afterburner, we continued to climb with a roll of about 60 degrees and lay down on a heading of 100. At 8 m we switched to level flight and crossed the sound barrier.
Here the Gremlikha station began to guide us.
We continued to accelerate and climb, and at 16 we already had 000 M, after which we turned into a combat course of 2,3 degrees.
The operator extended and turned on the OMB, and five seconds later the target was captured, and the affected area appeared on the indicator on the windshield.
A pleasant female voice in the headphones announced "Attack".
SR-71 was on a return course, east to west.
As usual, we started aiming at 16, gradually moving up to 000.
Close to 60 km, I noticed a contrail from SR-71 on a crossing course.
I gave the bearing to my operator so that he also looked. A contrail at an altitude of 22-23 km can be seen very rarely, but on this day the weather was excellent.
I passed under the spy, he was 3–000 meters above us, and I could even see his black silhouette.
The SR-71 flew over the ocean, carefully keeping a distance of 60 km from the coastline.
I informed the command post that we were breaking contact, and turned off the afterburner.
We were in the air (at this point) 15 min 40 sec.
The Blackbird was flying its usual route over neutral waters, so there was no point in pursuing it any further.
The guidance station gave us a course for the airfield, we descended to 15, slowed down to 000 M, switched to level flight and turned on the stopwatch.
This was the so-called "lantern cooling zone".
At speeds above 2 M, the skin, including the lantern, heated up to 800 degrees, and if this mode was not maintained, the lantern could crack and even collapse.
Then we descended and slowed down as usual, and landed without incident.
The entire flight lasted 54 minutes.
While we were on the combat course, the reserve crew was in the plane with the engines running.
This was the only time in my 14 intercepts that I saw the SR-71 with my own eyes."

So the Swedes were not the only ones who could bring down Drozd.

And what about the American pilots, have they really never noticed anything?

There is no information in the book about what they knew about the persistent attempts of the stubborn Swedes.

As for the Soviet MiGs… the author of the book has done research and believes that the two interceptions of Major Myagky, who was then the captain, coincide in time with the flights of Lieutenant Colonel Ed Yeilding, who was then a major.

What did you see on the other side?


Let's look at what is happening from the other side.

Since Ed gave a very colorful description of the flights, I will start quoting him from afar.

“The purpose of our reconnaissance flights over the Barents Sea was to collect information.
We flew along the edge of the territorial waters of the USSR to the Kanin Peninsula.
We are very proud of these tasks. We knew that the USSR was a potential enemy of the free world, and keeping an eye on its military activity was a very important task.
We were given a route and targets for our cameras and sensors, but we were never told which of our intelligence agencies was interested in these things.
I think the main interest was in the images of submarines in ports and the missiles with nuclear warheads that were loaded into them.
In addition, we recorded all types of electromagnetic radiation on our route.
The flight started from Mildenehall base in England. Our crews were there on a 6-week basis, and we flew not only to the Barents Sea, but also to other areas.
The takeoff was at half load and minimal fuel, after which we immediately rendezvoused with the tanker and refueled.”


This happened at an altitude of 25 feet.
Our VHF radios were encrypted and gave us automatic bearing and range without the need for voice exchange.
After docking, we were able to communicate with the crew of the tanker via the internal intercom system.
Refueling required great attention and care, especially in conditions of severe turbulence. As you fill tanks we were approaching the “stall moment” at full load, so we had to carefully work with the thrust of the engines.
After refueling, we switched to supersonic.
To do this, we ascended to 33 feet at Mach 000 and began a gentle descent. There was a little resistance as you approached M0,9 and then you suddenly stepped over the barrier.
The aircraft was designed for continuous supersonic flight, so no noise or vibration was felt.
After leveling out at 30, I enjoyed looking through the periscope at our contrail, which looked like a rollercoaster.
Then we turned north, climbed up to 71 and accelerated to M000.
Off the northeast coast of Norway, we again descended for a second refueling, this area was informally called "Northern Viking".

Major Soft recalls that just this event was tracked by our radio intelligence and served as an indication that the SR-71 would soon appear at the borders.

After refueling, we again headed north, gradually reaching 71 feet and 000 M, following the coast of Norway to its northernmost point, and then turning east.
The aircraft was designed for the most economical mode at Mach 3,2 and high altitude, but our missions in the Barents Sea are limited to Mach 3 and a maximum bank of 32 degrees.
The turning radius at this speed and with this bank was about 80 miles, and a 90-degree turn took almost 4 minutes.
When information gathering began, we always turned on the autopilot to keep the plane as level as possible. The autopilot was programmed to maintain a certain minimum pitch, so I constantly corrected it with a small yoke on the right panel and careful movements of the thrust control. At that time, autopilots did not have the ability to maintain accurate speed.
Waypoints and turn-on points were loaded into the autopilot on the ground using magnetic tape. In flight, the autopilot received data from the astro-inertial navigation system and kept the course very accurately.
In case of a failure, I could maintain the course manually by keeping the deviation indicator in the center of a given band on the indicator, but this happened very rarely.
There was no GPS system at that time, but we had a small telescope behind the Reconnaissance Equipment Operator (RSO) seat that automatically tracked the correct stars and gave corrections to the astro-navigation system.

Flights over the Barents Sea were especially interesting because it is located beyond the Arctic Circle.
I will never forget my first visit to this place in December 1984. We had just rounded Norway's northernmost bulge at 72 degrees latitude, heading east, when I turned my head 90 degrees to the left and looked straight north.
In the ominous December twilight, I was surprised to see the Moon just above the horizon.
Having lived most of my life in relatively low latitudes, I knew for sure that the Moon appeared in the east.
Naturally, I thought: what is this, the east there?
So we're flying south, straight to Russia?
My magnetic compass showed only a 15-degree deviation from the course, which I was very pleased with.
But still, to be completely sure, I asked Steve, my RSO, if he sees the right stars.
He answered in the affirmative, and I calmed down.
It was only later, when I thought about it again, that I realized that in December the earth's axis deviated from the direction of the Sun and leaned towards the Moon, and in conjunction with the high geographical latitude and our height of 73 feet, I was able to look over the top of the Earth and see the Moon on the other side.
Although the Barents Sea lies almost entirely within the Arctic Circle, even in December we could often see the sun just above the horizon from high altitude.
Our route often forced us to cross the terminator line, and one day in late December we crossed the terminator six times, watching sunsets and sunrises almost continuously.

One of the flights was especially memorable because we encountered a MiG-31.
All of our flights were classified, so I didn't take any notes, and I can't now remember with certainty the day it happened.
However, I am certain that Curt Osterheld was the RSO operator and we only did two tours to Mildenhall with him, so this meeting must have been between 25.08.1986/08.10.1986/14.04.1987 - 07.05.1987/XNUMX/XNUMX or XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX - XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX.
I think this was the last flight of our first tour, and the flight log records show that we had a 4-hour flight on October 6, 1986.

On that memorable day, we completed the first pass along the coast of the USSR near Murmansk and turned 90 degrees to the left, due north.
After about a minute of flight in a northerly direction, we turned 180 degrees and rushed south, to the Russian shores.
The altitude was about 75 feet. From this height, we could observe an area 000 miles in diameter and see the earth's surface slightly curved.
Far ahead, perhaps 100 miles away, I noticed a long, bright white contrail reaching towards us, but much lower.
I knew it had to be a Soviet fighter, possibly a MiG-31, the newest interceptor the Russians had at the time.
I raised the periscope, looked back and saw that we, too, were leaving a well-marked trail, and realized that the Russian was also seeing us.
Since we were flying regular routes, the Russians knew perfectly well the point where we would turn 90 degrees to the right and head west along the coast.
I imagined that the Russian pilot should be like us, with love for aviation and striving to be the very best in what he does.
I also realized that he had orders to fire if I was too late to turn and slip inside the Russian borders, and that there was nothing better for him than to fire missiles at SR-71.

I trusted that he would not fire while we were on our usual route in no man's land, but I also knew that he or his ground targeting station might mistake our position and think we were closer than we really were.
In the 80s we didn't worry too much about missiles, relying on our speed and altitude.
I knew from my previous experience flying the F-4 that the MiG-31 had maneuverability problems at high altitudes and would have difficulty calculating the launch triangle.
We also thought that an air-to-air missile at that altitude and in thin air would have problems with maneuverability and range.
For missiles with a radar homing head, our small reflective surface would be a problem, and besides, we had the ability to jam.
I knew that our contrail would help him point in the right direction, and the heat-headed missiles might take us.
We didn't have protective gear like heat traps, but again we relied on our speed and altitude.
I decided that I would fly the same course.

This flight towards each other at supersonic speed reminded me of two knights galloping at each other, only we didn’t have weapons.
To survive, we relied on the accuracy of our navigational instruments, which kept us outside the Russian borders, and this made it impossible to fire a rocket at us.
In the event that this does happen, we counted on the capabilities of our aircraft.

The fighter's contrail continued straight towards us, but much lower.
I directly felt how he was trying to accelerate in order to jump out to the same height as us, and I looked at the indicator counting the distance to the turn.
The distance decreased by a mile every two seconds.
As always, I was ready to start the turn manually if the autopilot for some reason refused to do so, but this time it obediently turned 90 to the right at the set point.
The turn was programmed with a bank of 32 degrees.
I carefully watched the instruments, ready to react to any malfunction, and at the same time often turned my head, watching the fighter.
From the contrail, I determined that he went up steeply and straight at us.
About a minute after the start of the turn, I saw below, in the direction of 7 o'clock, the gray silhouette of a fighter at the top of its jump.
We were still banked 32 degrees to the right, but I saw it as a very large dot.
I couldn't see any features like the twin fins, but from my experience with F-4 interceptions, the minimum distance to the fighter was about 8 miles, and its height was probably somewhere around 65 feet - then is about 000 below us.
It seems that at this point he lost speed, his nose dropped below the horizon, and he went down.

During my three years of flying reconnaissance missions, I often saw the contrails of potentially hostile aircraft below.
But only on that day, far beyond the Arctic Circle, over the Barents Sea, I saw a metal hull, albeit barely noticeable, and even then only because our route was completely predictable.

End of quote.

It is a pity that our pilots do not write memoirs, and such interesting events have to be looked for in English-language literature.

Here is such an excursion into history. I was interested, and I hope you are too.

Sources:
1. https://www.hotcars.com/how-saabs-viggen-fighter-almost-took-down-legendary-sr-71-blackbird
2. https://nationalinterest.org/blog/reboot/country-almost-shot-down-sr-71-blackbird-199482
3. https://www.hotcars.com/how-saabs-viggen-fighter-almost-took-down-legendary-sr-71-blackbird
4. https://www.airforcemag.com/article/saving-a-blackbird
5. https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/cold-war-showdown-swedish-ja-37-viggen-vs-sr-71-blackbird-66156
6. https://theaviationgeekclub.com/ja-37-viggen-pilot-explains-how-he-was-able-to-carry-out-the-first-successful-swedish-air-force-intercept-of- an-sr-71-mach-3-spy-plane-over-the-baltic
7. https://www.historynet.com/unstart-over-murmansk.htm
8. https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/your-air-force/2018/12/30/finally-declassified-swedish-pilots-awarded-us-air-medals-for-saving-sr-71-spy-plane
9. Graham R. Flying the SR-71 Blackbird: In the Cockpit on a Secret Operational Mission
10. Paul F. Crickmore. Lockheed SR-71 Operations in Europe and the Middle East
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

59 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    25 January 2022 11: 32
    The plane is beautiful in its own way, in fact, many planes are beautiful, both ours and not ours at all. The article is interesting, as are the excerpts from the book. Like blackbirds over Kamchatka once flew into our waters. No one knows it intentionally or on purpose, at least in our country. In Kamchatka and Sakhalin, he was hunted.
    1. 0
      28 January 2022 17: 31
      When searching for the wreckage of a passenger Boeing shot down in the Far East, one of the search vessels raised the wreckage of the surface from the Black Drozd. Read the book, World War III,,. There are investigations and what slipped into the press at that time about this story. There are a lot of interesting things. And not everything that the governments at that time announced about this incident, including from the USSR, was true. I can confirm this, since the regiment commander of the pilot who shot down the South Korean was my friend. After this incident, he was transferred
      serve near Kursk.
  2. +1
    25 January 2022 11: 32
    station "Gremlikh"

    Unfamiliar name. Is this a code designation or a typo for the air defense base located in Gremikha?
  3. +9
    25 January 2022 11: 41
    Thank you for the article! Very educational.
  4. +5
    25 January 2022 11: 51
    It is a pity that our pilots do not write memoirs, and such interesting events have to be looked for in English-language literature.
    Really sorry
    1. -1
      25 January 2022 20: 21
      One writes, I like it, only "political workers" water it from a tub.
      Perhaps this is different, but the "censors" and "GT overseers" who want a stick and a daw to cut down any desire are beaten off.
    2. 0
      31 January 2022 13: 13
      All participants in those non-disclosure subscription events were for 25 years. And now they are no longer interested in this, the priorities are completely different.
  5. +2
    25 January 2022 12: 00
    Very interesting, both for those who served in air defense and for fighter pilots. The Strategic Missile Forces also had their own problems, though with space reconnaissance. In the 70s, it was decided to completely turn off communication and movement at the starting positions during the flight of the reconnaissance satellite. Regulatory work was carried out taking into account this factor. Although sometimes they specifically gave the opportunity to photograph the missile base due to some kind of interstate agreements. Sometimes they asked to open the covers of the mines to make sure that the missiles were definitely standing and not a dummy, in order to mislead the enemy. soldier
  6. 0
    25 January 2022 12: 03
    Yes, they "wrote" memoirs that the pilots, that the officers of the ground forces, for example, in the Second World War. Only ranks from colonel and above.
  7. +4
    25 January 2022 12: 08
    Great article! Respect to the author!
  8. MP
    +5
    25 January 2022 12: 35
    Very interesting! Thanks a lot!
  9. +11
    25 January 2022 12: 47
    those who want to feel like a pilot in the MiG-31)))

    and at the operator's place -

    even had a chance to sit there)))
  10. +4
    25 January 2022 13: 12
    Thanks for the interesting article! I read it in one breath
  11. +12
    25 January 2022 13: 28
    Major's story is disinformation.
    The operator extended and turned on the OMB, and five seconds later the target was captured, and the affected area appeared on the indicator on the windshield.
    A pleasant female voice in the headphones announced "Attack".

    The direction finder does not give range, there are no affected areas. The affected area is given by the radar.
    At speeds above 2 M, the skin, including the lantern, heated up to 800 degrees, and if this mode was not maintained, the lantern could crack and even collapse.

    No, there are 800 degrees at 3 M. 300-400 from the strength will be typed.
    Do not believe everything that is written on different fences.
    1. +4
      25 January 2022 13: 59
      No, there are 800 degrees at 3 M. 300-400 from the strength will be typed.

      Yes, there is a clear overkill here. At maximum speed, some elements of the airframe sometimes heated up to 1050 degrees Fahrenheit, that is, 566 Celsius. But it's definitely not a flashlight.
    2. +6
      25 January 2022 14: 07
      No there 800 degrees
      Maybe the Americans translated our "degrees" into Fahrenheit for theirs, something like this and it turns out 800 of them, a little more than 400 of ours.
    3. kig
      +8
      25 January 2022 15: 01
      Quote: KKND
      No there 800 degrees

      Sorry, but I wrote about what I read:
      During flight at speeds in excess of Mach 2, the skin, including the canopy, heated up to 800°C.
      Naturally, either an error or a typo could have crept in. The book mentions that the major's memoirs got into the book from a certain "Russian writer Romanenko, who writes about military aviation" - it is not clear what kind of person he is. That is, from the second or third words. If you know exactly the degree of heating, then great. But in this case, this accuracy is unlikely to matter.
      1. +2
        25 January 2022 15: 06
        Quote: kig
        But in this case, this accuracy is unlikely to matter.

        Indeed, this is insignificant. But the fact that the major does not understand the basic principles of the operation of the heat direction finder means that he has nothing to do with the MiG-31 at all.
        1. kig
          +4
          25 January 2022 15: 46
          Quote: KKND
          the major does not understand the basic principles of the operation of the heat direction finder, which means that he has nothing to do with the MiG-31 at all.

          Well, the principle of operation of the heat direction finder is clear, but about its use on the MIG-31 it is said, for example, here http://www.airwar.ru/enc/fighter/mig31.html:

          To carry out covert interception, the interceptor is equipped with an IR search and tracking system based on the 8TP heat direction finder. The direction finder is located under the nose of the fuselage. In the non-working position, the device is retracted into a special fuselage compartment. The direction finder is connected to the radar, with his helpyu is issued target designation for missiles with IR homing heads R-40TD and R-60.
          1. -1
            25 January 2022 15: 57
            The operator extended and turned on the OMB, and five seconds later the target was captured, and the affected area appeared on the indicator on the windshield.
            A pleasant female voice in the headphones announced "Attack".

            You consciously avoid awkward moments?
            Once again, the direction finder does not issue affected areas
            You can launch thermal rockets with one heat direction finder.
            The radar does not need to be turned on.
            Once again, to get the affected area, you need to turn on the radar.
            1. kig
              +6
              26 January 2022 02: 50
              What are the awkward moments? It seems that you are deliberately missing the point that I am not the author, but only found a book, in English, which describes this story. There is a link, read and offer your own version.
    4. 0
      30 January 2022 16: 25
      At a speed of 3200, the glazing of the lantern was heated up to 300 degrees.
      From the test report.
  12. +2
    25 January 2022 13: 32
    Thanks for the article, a friend served in the Murmansk region, as a radar operator, many of his stories were forgotten. I only remember when the SR71 appeared, there was a grandiose nix, they went exactly on schedule and drew the trajectory of its flight only with dotted lines on the screen of the operational duty air defense.
    1. kig
      +5
      25 January 2022 15: 04
      Quote: tralflot1832
      it was a big bummer

      yes of course. It's no joke - in 30 minutes to fly around the entire coast of the Baltic Sea and whistle into a mink, process records.
  13. +13
    25 January 2022 15: 13
    I read it with great pleasure! I, after all, is that “other side” for SR pilots.
    I, just in 1984 ... 86, served on the border with Norway as an operator of an early warning radar (RTV air defense of the country). And on a weekly basis I saw the passage of SR at the IKO (in our country, by the way, he bore the nickname “Black Bustard”, and not “Thrush”), and the take-off of 31 MiGs from the airfield in Moncha, and the return of everyone to their homes. Judging by the dates in the article, I saw both the American Ed and our Myagky.
    At the beginning of the service, Readiness No. 1 for the “bustard” was exotic and interesting, at the end it caused nothing but irritation, because. added several hours to the station's daily schedule.
    Thanks to the author, it’s very nice to remember the “combat” youth.
    1. +1
      25 January 2022 17: 17
      And I'm in 79-81. Leningrad separate air defense army. hi
  14. -6
    25 January 2022 15: 16
    Shit bastard!
    The 10th Separate Red Banner Air Defense Army of the country was "sharpened" for these spy planes, and as soon as it got up from the Mig-25 or Mig-31 BL, these ... spies immediately fell as far as possible from the line of interception
    1. 0
      25 January 2022 15: 31
      Apparently, they were not badly aware of the time and place of the take-off of the interceptors.
    2. +7
      25 January 2022 18: 58
      Quote: RoTTor
      as soon as he got up from the Mig-25 or Mig-31 BL, these ... spies immediately fell as far as possible from the line of interception
      Nonsense, they didn't go anywhere. They walked along the border. Our MiGs took off and accompanied them in parallel courses along the border too (only from our side). Then they returned in the same parallel courses: SR went home to England, ours went home to Monchegorsk. Not once in two years of weekly observation, I have not seen someone "blame" from someone.
  15. -6
    25 January 2022 15: 30
    If they could sit down on Avik, then it is possible that Biden could write this bird down on his battle account of those shot down))))
  16. -2
    25 January 2022 16: 20
    Quote: RoTTor
    Shit bastard!
    The 10th Separate Red Banner Air Defense Army of the country was "sharpened" for these spy planes, and as soon as it got up from the Mig-25 or Mig-31 BL, these ... spies immediately fell as far as possible from the line of interception

    10 air defense AA in the post-Soviet period was transformed into a division, then into a brigade, then it is difficult to say what was left of it.
    During these years, she became famous only for a lot of criminal cases on the theft of fuel, coal, airfield stoves, a bribe for conferring the rank of general, which is interesting - after the arrest of Colonel P. it was still awarded, he met the event in the cell. True, while he was there, the decree regarding him was canceled.
    What I mean: the army should do business. As soon as she begins to engage in certain "reforms" - put out the lights, "the house is gone," as Philipp Filppovich said.
  17. +3
    25 January 2022 17: 15
    He worked on thrushes in 79-81. A couple of times I even saw it on the indicator (Leningrad separate air defense army). They had a clear schedule, once a week flying along our borders. Sometimes with a short flight (like a sideways strike) into our space.
  18. +1
    25 January 2022 17: 25
    Very interesting! Respect to the author! hi
  19. 0
    25 January 2022 17: 26
    Yes, alas, everything is unknown to us. (Or just classified)

    Therefore, the media have to refer to foreign ones - they write how they worry when flying in the Arctic, over the sea, somewhere else ....
    There are websites, there are videos, there are photos, there are pages of social networks .... but alas, they are Western ....
  20. +2
    25 January 2022 21: 21
    The book suggests looking at the ejector nozzle of the damaged right engine, but personally I don't see anything there... alas.

    Good article, kudos to the author. The nozzle of the right engine in the picture is opened with a camomile, but the left one is not, a smooth edge. This is what was meant.
  21. wow
    +7
    25 January 2022 21: 24
    The photo of the SR-71 taken by the Swedish pilot shows that the right engine has failed. The doors of the RS are fully open, which would correspond to dir. Fast and Furious, but not here, or ground launch mode - also not. Then the engine does not work and is in dir. autorotation. But the left dvigun, judging by the maximum closing of the nozzle flaps, is in the Maximal mode.
    1. kig
      +1
      26 January 2022 05: 50
      Oh, experts have appeared, very good. Thanks!
  22. 0
    25 January 2022 22: 24
    Quite an interesting article! Thank you. I envy the flyers - they had an interesting service!
  23. -1
    25 January 2022 23: 58
    Saab JAS 37 Viggen and not some JA37 Vigen.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  24. +1
    26 January 2022 06: 16
    Very interesting article, thanks to the author!
  25. 0
    26 January 2022 15: 58
    Interesting article, but many questions.

    1. Technicians first ran to the plane and removed the R60 missiles, since at speeds over 1,75 Mach they would still be blocked.

    It’s already interesting, but there were still R-40Ts at that time ...

    2. The reasoning of the American pilot about the shortcomings of the MiG-31 is also strange: the calculation of the triangle of speeds, problems with maneuverability and launch range.
    1. +1
      28 January 2022 20: 35
      Quote: Pavel57

      It’s already interesting, but there were still R-40Ts at that time ...

      R-60 missiles - close maneuverable combat, weighing 48 kg (when intercepting SR 71 is useless), R-40 - range 30 (radio head) 36 km (thermal head), weight 455-465 kg. The letter (index P or T) at the end of the name means the type of homing head. The height of the thermal GOS is up to 30 km.
  26. 0
    27 January 2022 03: 40
    >Russian military aviation writer Valery Romanenko

    Maybe of course the namesake, but still I'll leave it here
    https://www.amazon.com/Romanenko-Spravochnik-organizacii-organization-composition/dp/B071995SRF

    https://www.ozon.ru/product/vvs-xxi-spravochnik-po-organizatsii-i-boevomu-sostavu-vvs-tom-1-evropa-33077223/?sh=5yGvegAAAA

    >look at the ejector nozzle of the damaged right engine

    The right nozzle seems to be expanded, i.e. left in Mach 3 position after the crash, I guess.
  27. +2
    27 January 2022 11: 35
    Quote: Free Wind
    In Kamchatka and Sakhalin, he was hunted.

    If it really flew in, they would have been shot down. In those days, he served in the Air Defense Forces of the SV in the PribVO, taking up combat duty, more than once took him on auto-escort, as an air target was not particularly difficult. For the air defense system that it operated, all the difficulty was only in the range of the aircraft's flight path, as a result of which the target was in the affected area for several seconds, i.e. in the event of receiving an order for destruction, it did not give time for processing, therefore, for this purpose, all preparations for the launch of the rocket were carried out in advance. The "object" air defense systems, ship forces and means, air defense fighters also worked for this purpose, there was zero chance of going home in the event of a violation of the country's airspace, therefore, due to the low efficiency and unjustified high cost of each flight, such flights soon ceased and this innovative aircraft was withdrawn from service. By the way, it was designed as a fighter, but after the advent of effective air defense, the purpose changed, yes, and as far as I remember, the MiG-25 was inferior to it only in flight time in terms of fuel reserve, all other parameters were identical or superior.
    1. 0
      27 January 2022 12: 13
      chances, in case of violation of the country's airspace, to go home was zero
      It seems that the Cubans fired at him from the 75th complex, and we had something in 84 with the participation of aviation in the Far East (like near Kamchatka), but I don’t know whether there was a real attack and I don’t know the details. Maybe someone in the know? The Americans write that all his losses were "non-combat".
      1. 0
        27 January 2022 19: 35
        the Cuban S-75 (Soviet calculation) shot down U2 in the 62nd, the same as ours near Sverdlovsk, after which the flights stopped. The SR-71 was put into service in the 66th, at that time the data obtained during flights on the island was worth nothing, unlike the preparation and departure of this aircraft.
        1. 0
          28 January 2022 08: 56
          No, I was talking specifically about the SR-71, and the fact of launching missiles does not mean the defeat of the target, in addition, the "historical chronicles" confirm the fact that the SR-71 made reconnaissance flights in Cuba.
  28. +1
    27 January 2022 15: 09
    Quote: seacap
    Quote: Free Wind
    In Kamchatka and Sakhalin, he was hunted.

    If it really flew in, they would have been shot down. In those days, he served in the Air Defense Forces of the SV in the PribVO, taking up combat duty, more than once took him on auto-escort, as an air target was not particularly difficult. For the air defense system that it operated, all the difficulty was only in the range of the aircraft's flight path, as a result of which the target was in the affected area for several seconds, i.e. in the event of receiving an order for destruction, it did not give time for processing, therefore, for this purpose, all preparations for the launch of the rocket were carried out in advance. The "object" air defense systems, ship forces and means, air defense fighters also worked for this purpose, there was zero chance of going home in the event of a violation of the country's airspace, therefore, due to the low efficiency and unjustified high cost of each flight, such flights soon ceased and this innovative aircraft was withdrawn from service. By the way, it was designed as a fighter, but after the advent of effective air defense, the purpose changed, yes, and as far as I remember, the MiG-25 was inferior to it only in flight time in terms of fuel reserve, all other parameters were identical or superior.


    1. Calculations were made on the possibility of knocking it down so that the wreckage fell on our territory. Did not work out.
    2. The history of creation is more complicated: it was made as a CIA intelligence officer A-11. From it was born the Air Force reconnaissance SR-71 and the F-12 interceptor. There were bomber projects. As far as I remember, training aircraft for the Air Force and the CIA were different.

    3. The MiG-25 was inferior to the American family in all major parameters. Unless it was cheaper to manufacture and operate.
    1. +1
      27 January 2022 19: 42
      Maybe I don’t argue, I didn’t really delve into this issue, it was not relevant. While serving in the air defense of the SV, my main opponent was the SVN TA and AA, KR, etc., and the strategists, if possible, if they wander or are able to reach my ZP, such as a load.
      As for the wreckage, there is no need for special calculations here, just a case and several conditions are needed. We sat at the b / d as if on a falconry, at first aviation worked, and we were "in the bushes" with a rifle and buckshot, waiting for someone to make a mistake and who had more stupidity.
  29. 0
    28 January 2022 15: 26
    Southeast of Gotland?
  30. +2
    28 January 2022 15: 46
    Our memories can be viewed here: [media=http://forums.airforce.ru/holodnaya-voina/printfriendly939-6/?pp=30].
    From myself I will say that in the second half of the 1980s I worked at the Sukhoi Design Bureau and they said there that almost the first Drozd interception was made in the North by Su-27. Allegedly, the pilot explicitly requested permission to destroy the target - he was also explicitly banned. And after this episode, "Drozdov" was urgently sent to the scrap ...
    They didn’t like to “bayan” in our design bureau, so I’m telling it here. But I myself "did not hold a candle" ...
    1. +1
      28 January 2022 21: 08
      Here then it is necessary to clarify what at that moment was understood by the term "interception"! If the SR-71 really violated the border, and at that time the Su-27 had the "PR" sign, this is one thing, but if it walked along the border and did not violate it, then there could be no championship, the same MiG-31 appeared earlier, had better speed and altitude, and the radar and V-V weapons had a higher range.
      1. +1
        1 February 2022 17: 10
        Quote: Hexenmeister
        If the SR-71 actually violated the border...

        Violated! The fact of the matter is that "Drozdy" regularly flew into the territory of the USSR: it accelerates to 3M, flies in and immediately turns back: like "I accidentally" ...
        But at such speeds, any turn is hundreds of kilometers ...
        And while he was turning like that, all of our air defense was caressing him ... And he was recording her signals ...
        the Americans, of course, kept quiet about this, ours too - so as not to disgrace. Since we didn’t have a fighter that could wait in the air for the Drozd in advance: both the MiG-23 and the -25 started from airfields, since they did not have enough flight duration for more.
        But when the Su-27s appeared, they began to meet the Drozds already in the air, at positions: a little flew in - and they are already leading you, the missiles are ready for launch ... After that conversation in the air, the Drozdy stopped "hooliganism" and stopped: realized that they would no longer joke with them.
        And without these "zaletov" nobody needed them!
        This is what I heard then. But now everyone is talking about the MiG-31. I can’t say anything here: maybe he did such things ...
        1. -1
          1 February 2022 17: 50
          But when the Su-27s appeared, they began to meet the Drozdovs already in the air, at positions: you just flew in - and they are already leading you, the missiles are ready for launch ...
          Here, too, not everything is so simple. The SR-71 was flying at an altitude of 22 ... 23 km, I can assume that the Su-27 could have been at an altitude of 12 km for a long time, but the launch range on a target exceeding 10 km will be small, that is, it should be essentially near the point of violation, and to rise higher to increase the launch zone, this is already a transition to supersonic, which is uneconomical for it, and the time spent on it is limited. Of course, it's good when there are several different types of aircraft that can "catch" a reconnaissance aircraft, but there are still many problems regarding the SR-71 attack.
          1. 0
            1 February 2022 18: 46
            Quote: Hexenmeister
            But when the Su-27s appeared, they began to meet the Drozdovs already in the air, at positions: you just flew in - and they are already leading you, the missiles are ready for launch ...
            Here, too, not everything is so simple. The SR-71 was flying at an altitude of 22 ... 23 km, I can assume that the Su-27 could have been at an altitude of 12 km for a long time, but the launch range on a target exceeding 10 km will be small, that is, it should be essentially near the point of violation, and to rise higher to increase the launch zone, this is already a transition to supersonic, which is uneconomical for it, and the time spent on it is limited. Of course, it's good when there are several different types of aircraft that can "catch" a reconnaissance aircraft, but there are still many problems regarding the SR-71 attack.

            I agree!
    2. kig
      0
      30 January 2022 03: 21
      Quote: PilotS37
      You can see our memories here

      I looked - there are interesting moments, but even there not a single pilot appeared who would participate in the interception.
      1. 0
        1 February 2022 16: 54
        Quote: kig
        Quote: PilotS37
        You can see our memories here

        I looked - there are interesting moments, but even there not a single pilot appeared who would participate in the interception.

        Well, how many were there?
        And where are they now?
        And only a few write memoirs among pilots.
  31. 0
    28 January 2022 21: 48
    Quote: Pushkar
    Quote: Pavel57

    It’s already interesting, but there were still R-40Ts at that time ...

    R-60 missiles - close maneuverable combat, weighing 48 kg (when intercepting SR 71 is useless), R-40 - range 30 (radio head) 36 km (thermal head), weight 455-465 kg. The letter (index P or T) at the end of the name means the type of homing head. The height of the thermal GOS is up to 30 km.

    What is the maneuverable combat on the MiG-31? And the R-40R has nothing to do with the MiG-31. But the R-40T with a launch range for a bright target in the IR range could well have been 50 km. At the same time, unmasking target light was not required. And I would get it in terms of altitude.
  32. 0
    29 January 2022 21: 44
    The book suggests looking at the ejector nozzle of the damaged right engine, but personally I don't see anything there... alas.

    - the nozzle flaps of the right engine are, as it were, "opened" compared to the left one.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"