Military Review

US President: We will consider an attack on Ukraine and the actions of Russian servicemen there who are not dressed in Russian military uniforms an attack on Ukraine

100

The US administration spoke ahead of a meeting scheduled for today between Secretary of State Anthony Blinken and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. This meeting is to be held in Geneva. The comments concern not only issues of strategic security, but also new warnings to the Russian Federation about the so-called "possible attack on Ukraine."


US President Joe Biden, who received a fair amount of criticism for his statements that "a deep Russian invasion of Ukraine will lead to serious consequences," decided to specify his words. He noted exactly what actions he intends to consider an invasion.

According to Joe Biden, this will not only be the movement of Russian troops across Ukrainian territory, but also cyber attacks against Ukraine.

Biden:

We will consider the attack on Ukraine and the actions there, including the "gray zone", of Russian servicemen not dressed in Russian military uniforms.

According to the 46th President of the United States, the United States is ready to respond to all this, "using the entire arsenal of available opportunities." At the same time, the current owner of the White House repeated his statement made during the briefing that "Russian banks will be prohibited from any operations with dollars."

Biden’s words that Washington is going to consider an “attack on Ukraine” contain an actual hint that Ukraine’s Western “partners” or (and) Ukrainian intelligence services controlled by them are themselves capable of committing a provocation, in order to later pass it off as allegedly the actions of the Russian Federation . The words about considering a cyber attack as an invasion sound almost a direct characteristic of the fact that the main message is anti-Russian sanctions, and they will find a reason overseas. And if they don't find it, they'll stage it.
Photos used:
Facebook / White House
100 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Klingon
    Klingon 21 January 2022 06: 40
    +33
    It is necessary to make a retaliatory move and convey to the striped ones that if any sanctions are introduced, the Russian Federation will not only immediately occupy Hochland, but it is possible that at the same time it will strangle one of the Baltic dwarfs. It is necessary to answer the ultimatum ohm to the ultimatum
    1. ser-pov
      ser-pov 21 January 2022 07: 25
      +12
      Quote: Klingon
      It is necessary to make a retaliatory move and convey to the striped ones that if any sanctions are introduced, the Russian Federation will not only immediately occupy Hochland, but it is possible that at the same time it will strangle one of the Baltic dwarfs. It is necessary to answer the ultimatum ohm to the ultimatum

      The light elves have gone completely nuts! And if in the form of military personnel of the Republic of Vanuatu, this will be considered an invasion laughing
      1. El Chuvachino
        El Chuvachino 21 January 2022 09: 18
        +18
        And here we are, all in white laughing
        1. Vasyan1971
          Vasyan1971 22 January 2022 05: 04
          -1
          Quote: El Chuvachino
          And here we are, all in white

          And I always giggled at the "armored bras" of the imperial assaults ... They are all clone-boys there ... wassat
          1. Vladimir Mashkov
            Vladimir Mashkov 22 January 2022 21: 00
            0
            Grandpa Joe is completely crazy promoting this idea!

            Incidentally, because of this, second the reason for Zeley's request for the entry of NATO troops into Ukraine: the "attack" is a provocation by imaginary Russian military men who are not even in uniform! negative

            Something is heating up and even unrealistic options become possible! The US/NATO has gone crazy lately and seems ready for anything!negative
        2. Akuzenka
          Akuzenka 25 January 2022 17: 48
          0
          We will consider the attack on Ukraine and the actions there, including the "gray zone", of Russian servicemen not dressed in Russian military uniforms.
          That is, if Hungarians or Poles attack 404, not to mention the Uruguayans, is it still attacked by the Russian Federation ?! Class! It's the same universal formula. It is strange why our Ministry of Foreign Affairs does not use it? After all, this formula is not one hundred years old.
    2. Vend
      Vend 21 January 2022 10: 46
      +8
      It can be seen that the United States is doing very badly with the economy, since they are pushing the war so hard. Only war can save this rotten economic and civil bubble.
      1. Arkadich
        Arkadich 21 January 2022 20: 45
        0
        Yes, they have a normal economy, no worse than others. War is needed, but the aggravation under which you can earn, expand influence, more tightly tie the very thing to yourself.
        1. Vend
          Vend 24 January 2022 11: 29
          0
          Quote: Arkadich
          War is needed, but the aggravation under which you can earn, expand influence, more tightly tie the very thing to yourself.

          Color revolutions are enough for this, it is not a matter of economic problems.
          1. Arkadich
            Arkadich 24 January 2022 14: 37
            0
            You and I are talking about the same thing. In order to reduce your economic problems (and where without them), you need to have governments ready to support your production, provide cheap raw materials, labor, and if they are also ready to fight with others for you, and even while buying weapons from you, it’s generally great.
            1. Vend
              Vend 25 January 2022 10: 41
              0
              Quote: Arkadich
              You and I are talking about the same thing. In order to reduce your economic problems (and where without them), you need to have governments ready to support your production, provide cheap raw materials, labor, and if they are also ready to fight with others for you, and even while buying weapons from you, it’s generally great.

              Disagree, it's different. War can take place in the territory of the enemy, where your troops go, and color revolutions lead to civil war.
    3. Anachoret
      Anachoret 21 January 2022 13: 52
      +9
      "Deep invasion", "double invasion" ... Is Biden talking about politics?))
      1. hohohol
        hohohol 21 January 2022 19: 59
        +1
        "Deep invasion", "double invasion" ... Is Biden talking about politics?))

        No, of course, this is an ordinary everyday situation - enter, but not very deeply!
        1. Vasyan1971
          Vasyan1971 22 January 2022 21: 17
          -1
          Quote: hohohol
          No, of course, this is an ordinary everyday situation - enter, but not very deeply!

          Yeah. Halfway. wassat
      2. Arkadich
        Arkadich 21 January 2022 20: 42
        +2
        An old, sick man. What they wrote to him and voiced.
      3. CYM
        CYM 21 January 2022 21: 45
        0
        At his age, only politics is left to talk about. Although, maybe again the assistants slipped him something else instead of the text of the speech. lol
    4. Tomato
      Tomato 21 January 2022 14: 41
      +2
      You see, what's the matter, on the territory of the Baltic dwarf units of the United States and other NATO countries. We'll have to strangle everything NATO.
      Do you think that today Russia alone is stronger than the USSR + the Warsaw Pact, or are you just voicing your fantasies?
    5. Private89
      Private89 21 January 2022 18: 43
      +2
      In 2008, they did not take Georgia, although they could, in 2014 they could take Ukraine, they did not. There is an assumption that the money spent on an ordinary person in our country reduces the length of the oligarchs' yacht by a few millimeters, can you imagine how many new people would be added with the annexation of Ukraine, no, the current government cannot do such a thing. So America can sleep peacefully as long as we have such leaders.
  2. evgen1221
    evgen1221 21 January 2022 06: 41
    +12
    If only I could object to this gift of fate officially from the rostrum, ok, then we will consider an attack on the Russian Federation of America, American servicemen not dressed in their military uniforms and from any territory. That would be the case, but I suspect it will end with a giggle over kisseltv and another concern.
    1. Aerodrome
      Aerodrome 21 January 2022 06: 43
      +36
      US President: We will consider an attack on Ukraine and the actions of Russian servicemen there who are not dressed in Russian military uniforms
      any shot from Ukraine at the DNL or LPR is considered to be made by the Americans ...
      1. ser-pov
        ser-pov 21 January 2022 07: 28
        0
        Quote: Aerodrome
        US President: We will consider an attack on Ukraine and the actions of Russian servicemen there who are not dressed in Russian military uniforms
        any shot from Ukraine at the DNL or LPR is considered to be made by the Americans ...

        Made by the Americans and the invasion is immediately transferred to the UWB ...
        1. Deck
          Deck 21 January 2022 07: 51
          -2
          Will you personally carry it? Or who do you ask?
          1. ser-pov
            ser-pov 21 January 2022 07: 55
            -1
            Quote: Deck
            Will you personally carry it? Or who do you ask?

            Do you want to participate?
            1. Deck
              Deck 21 January 2022 09: 00
              +3
              No, I see no reason. And then I'm a grown man
          2. ak1978
            ak1978 22 January 2022 04: 01
            -1
            Seryozha, according to an old tradition, is a strategist. Like all generals, a fan of the team to distribute remotely. Like those handsome men who sent soldiers of the unshelled hero city Grozny on the night of 31.12.1994/01.01.1995/XNUMX to XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX head-on to storm. Nuace? Let's throw hats!
      2. evgen1221
        evgen1221 21 January 2022 18: 44
        +2
        Exactly. It would be more shuganul violent heads than the announcement of ultimatums with a bare booty. Amers do not care about ukrov, but if they are under their control, then let them watch their dogs in order to avoid serious injuries to the owner.
    2. Bad thing
      Bad thing 21 January 2022 06: 54
      +26
      It is possible in another way, we will consider the deployment of Amer’s troops or military instructors as preparation for an attack on the Russian Federation, and the actions of the Ukrainian DRGs as an attack by Ukraine on the Russian Federation.
    3. abrakadabre
      abrakadabre 21 January 2022 07: 29
      +14
      If only I could object to this gift of fate officially from the rostrum, ok, then we will consider an attack on the Russian Federation of America, American servicemen not dressed in their military uniforms and from any territory.
      Aaaaa ... Since such a booze has gone ... Then we must take it wider:
      Any attack on citizens of the Russian Federation in any country in the world, even if it is a drunken fight or local gopniks, should be considered as America's declaration of war on total annihilation. They themselves claim to be the world gendarme. Here, let the wards control.
      In the same way, consider the presence of any citizens (not only military) of NATO countries, not agreed with the Russian Federation by name, on the territory of the countries of the former USSR. Allow 24 hours to resolve the second item.
    4. KIND LAVRENTIUS
      KIND LAVRENTIUS 21 January 2022 16: 22
      -3
      Quote: evgen1221
      When we consider an attack on the Russian Federation of America, American servicemen not dressed in their military uniforms and from any territory. That would be the thing

      you are from Ukraine, right?
  3. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 21 January 2022 06: 45
    +10
    Is it possible to sneeze towards the "nezalezhnoy"? They don't know how to get out! But what about the "hundreds of thousands" of troops on the borders? Christmas, New Year, Epiphany offensives ... In general, the striped ears confused us wassat now they propose to attack "in civilian life"? And most importantly, in the virtual world in general, a cyber attack - it's so easy to organize it, accusing anyone of carrying it out!
    1. mitroha
      mitroha 21 January 2022 07: 14
      +9
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      cyberattack - it's so easy to organize it, accusing anyone of carrying it out!

      You can not hold it at all, but just talk about it, and high-like, Russia did it.
    2. Zoldat_A
      Zoldat_A 21 January 2022 07: 26
      +8
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      But what about the "hundreds of thousands" of troops on the borders? Christmas, New Year, Epiphany offensives ...

      I understood everything, Biden explained. There were no Christmas, New Year's, Epiphany offensives, because 100 did not have time to change into "training pants and lace-ups". In uniform, judging by Biden's words, it is now "not modern" to fight.


      - Where is my military uniform?
      “Please, Your Highness, please.
      What?! Me - in this? Single-breasted? Don't you know that no one is fighting in a single-breasted one now?
  4. sergo1914
    sergo1914 21 January 2022 06: 51
    +10
    Russian servicemen not wearing Russian military uniforms.


    So he presented. Naked with machine guns go on a psychic attack, like the Kappelites in Chapaev. Tin. Where is this world heading?
    1. usr01
      usr01 21 January 2022 06: 58
      +2
      Naked with machine guns...

      And if "in a special suit, during a break, over a beer ..." (c) are these also "Russian military personnel" ????
    2. Zoldat_A
      Zoldat_A 21 January 2022 07: 30
      +2
      Quote: sergo1914
      Naked with machine guns go on a psychic attack, like the Kappelites in Chapaev.

      Our naked ones won't go. Ours are in "training pants and lace-ups".
      Naked are Americans. In connection with the latest politically correct trends in the American army, fifty genders and other... repeat
    3. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 21 January 2022 10: 34
      +3
      Quote: sergo1914
      Russian servicemen not wearing Russian military uniforms.


      So he presented. Naked with machine guns go on a psychic attack, like the Kappelites in Chapaev. Tin. Where is this world heading?

      Apparently, the world is heading for war.
      Every day, mattresses narrow the field for maneuver more and more and invent absolutely crazy reasons for imposing sanctions, which leave Russia no choice but to really use the armed forces to bring Ukraine into a sane state with the withdrawal from under the influence of mattresses.
  5. Baron pardus
    Baron pardus 21 January 2022 06: 54
    +52
    Yeah, "Russian military men not dressed in uniform", that is, you guys are WARNED that they can declare ANY FUCKER a "Russian soldier". Absolutely ANY PERSON can now be declared by the United States "Russian military out of uniform." I live in the USA, but I warn you that you will be SET. They will take a photo of ANY armed people, declare them "Russian soldiers" and slap sanctions on you. UNDERSTAND, RUSSIANS, UNDERSTAND. You are dealing with a country that: a) Blew up its own cruiser "Maine" and accused Spain of attacking Spain. b) The country that LOADED ITS PASSENGER STEAMPER - Luitizania with AMMUNITION, framed it under German torpedoes, and, "burning with righteous anger", declared war on Germany. And only in the 1970s, emnip, did the United States admit that there were illegally loaded ammunition on the Luitizania. c) The country EXPOSED its Pacific Fleet to Japanese bombs and torpedoes (since the US Navy revealed the Japanese Navy's code about a year before the attack on Pearl Harbor) in order to convince its people to vote for war. d) She stated that in the Gulf of Tonkin, American destroyers were attacked by Vietnamese boats, and only, in the 90s (EMNIP), they admitted that there were NO boats, and this was a CIA operation. e) Announced that American students - losers are in danger in Grenada (those who could not enter US universities go there to study), and attacked Grenada. f) They told Iraq that they would not interfere in its showdown with Kuwait, and ... attacked. h) They accused Iraq of creating and storing WMD, did not allow UN inspectors to make a report, attacked and destroyed Iraq and ... did not find a single WMD. Well, further down the list. RUSSIANS, YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND WHO YOU ARE DEALING WITH. America headed for the Economic Blockade of Russia (See 1920s-1930s). The decision has already been made, you will be SET, just as the Spaniards and Vietnamese were set up, and the Kaiser to boot. You have blocked ALL channels through which you could convey YOUR point of view. There is NO "freedom of speech" here, the government said to kick RT television off the air, and American corporations simply refused to lease the air to RT. Freedom of speech for the "necessary", and not the unnecessary are sent by the forest. You have already been APPOINTED guilty. And all your negotiations will lead to ANYTHING. Just get ready. And understand - no one will let you explain, or even justify yourself. How they did not give Saddam Hussein, Muammarr Gaddafi, Vietnam, Kaiser (see the list above). In the best case, in 60 years they will say "Whoops, the crumbs were wrong. They put the economic blockade wrong" (how they admitted that the Luitizania was loaded with ammunition, and how they admitted that the incident in the Gulf of Tonkin was a fake).
    1. 1976AG
      1976AG 21 January 2022 06: 59
      +22
      We know very well who we are dealing with and have not been surprised by anything for a long time.
    2. Mountain shooter
      Mountain shooter 21 January 2022 07: 30
      +7
      Quote: Baron Pardus
      And understand - no one will let you explain, or even justify

      So we will not do either one or the other ... We know history not so badly.
    3. ser-pov
      ser-pov 21 January 2022 07: 36
      +10
      I'm just wondering how your guys in the US are going to survive! We are not Spain, not Iraq, not Libya, etc. We are Russians, and that says it all ... If you pass on us (and it’s already clear that your idiots from Congress have gone too far), tanks can climb ...
      1. Baron pardus
        Baron pardus 21 January 2022 08: 51
        +8
        How do we plan to survive? I explain: no one is going to BOMB you. No one will use WMD against you. At least at this stage. I repeat, this will be an economic blockade, like the one that the "progressive" West arranged for the USSR in the 20s and 30s. Naturally, because of such sanctions, you will not start a nuclear war of complete annihilation. Especially since your (or rather already ours) elite has all the money, and even children - here, in the west. And Putin, and Lavrov, and many others. They will simply crush you with economic sanctions, and inflate your discontent trying to cause a civil war - Maidan. And most likely, they will play on existing problems: the economic gap between the oligarchs and ordinary people, poverty, the dominance of migrants who take jobs from Russians and behave as if they are a titular nation, and even in the occupied territories. They will hit exactly where the problems already exist. And yours will never respond to this with a nuclear strike on the United States. While you are under economic sanctions that will surely damage your military industrial complex, the United States will develop missile defense systems, and when they develop and feel in impunity, then they will strike.
        1. ser-pov
          ser-pov 21 January 2022 09: 28
          +4
          To put pressure on, you need to have a healthy economy, which the US does not currently have! Moreover, do not forget that soon you will no longer be the first economy! Deprive us of a dollar, so the flag will be bent to your hands faster .. And who told you that we will give you time to develop this weapon? And the "progressive" West is not as homogeneous now as you think, and now is not the 20-30s of the last century ..
          1. Baron pardus
            Baron pardus 21 January 2022 10: 17
            +14
            I sincerely hope you are right. At the same time, I hope that the United States will fall apart faster than they will develop a successful missile defense system. But nonetheless. We have the strongest army, and especially the FLEET. The bandit does not need the economy, he puts others on money. The USA is not the world's policeman, but the world's BANDYUGA. Mark Twain also wrote about it. Therefore, having such an army and navy, and a code of sixes, and the United States will not have problems with money? "You don't want to invest in our public debt? So you don't have enough democracy, LGBT people are being infringed on crap, you have little freedom and WE ARE COMING TO YOU." Until the United States is sensitively hit somewhere in the teeth (as in Vietnam), the United States will not calm down.
            1. Nyrobsky
              Nyrobsky 21 January 2022 10: 52
              +8
              Quote: Baron Pardus
              I sincerely hope you are right. At the same time, I hope that the United States will fall apart faster than they will develop a successful missile defense system. But nonetheless. We have the strongest army, and especially the FLEET. The bandit does not need the economy, he puts others on money. The USA is not the world's policeman, but the world's BANDYUGA. Mark Twain also wrote about it. Therefore, having such an army and navy, and a code of sixes, and the United States will not have problems with money? "You don't want to invest in our public debt? So you don't have enough democracy, LGBT people are being infringed on crap, you have little freedom and WE ARE COMING TO YOU." Until the United States is sensitively hit somewhere in the teeth (as in Vietnam), the United States will not calm down.

              I read your comments, to be honest, I am surprised and discouraged. your point of view, as a person from the other side, corresponds to reality and expectations to the utmost, and at the same time without any banter, which is what many who "we ourselves are not local" sin with.
              However, there is hope that the US strategy will fail due to the fact that it is being developed in a stereotyped way, according to the same schemes, completely losing sight of the fact that Russia is strong with improvisation and non-standard moves. But so far everything is going as you wrote. Let's see.
              Best regards hi
            2. ser-pov
              ser-pov 21 January 2022 12: 40
              +4
              Quote: Baron Pardus
              I sincerely hope you are right. At the same time, I hope that the United States will fall apart faster than they will develop a successful missile defense system. But nonetheless. We have the strongest army, and especially the FLEET. The bandit does not need the economy, he puts others on money. The USA is not the world's policeman, but the world's BANDYUGA. Mark Twain also wrote about it. Therefore, having such an army and navy, and a code of sixes, and the United States will not have problems with money? "You don't want to invest in our public debt? So you don't have enough democracy, LGBT people are being infringed on crap, you have little freedom and WE ARE COMING TO YOU." Until the United States is sensitively hit somewhere in the teeth (as in Vietnam), the United States will not calm down.

              Here, of course, I won’t argue with you - everything is true, but there is one BUT ... It’s not possible to come to us just like that, you can significantly get in the teeth .... hi
            3. Arkadich
              Arkadich 21 January 2022 21: 03
              +3
              Yes, your truth, but it is not our truth. After all, we can’t live by logic (you can’t understand Russia with your mind, you can’t measure it with a common yardstick, it has a special become, you can only believe in Russia) and you can’t scare us with a shitty life. I think if we don't squabble among ourselves, we'll outlive everyone.
            4. ak1978
              ak1978 22 January 2022 03: 27
              -7
              Maybe a bardyugan, but everyone dreams of living like John Smith, and not Ivan Smirnov. And those who really lived under the great and mighty, remember and understand perfectly well why we were all so happy when this bloody misunderstanding fell apart and finally it was possible to buy normal food, clothes, watch any films and say what you think without fear of being arrested . And for those who were born later, they recommend revisiting the very truthful film "Lawlessness" 1989. There the USSR, about the restoration of which you know who so dreams of, is shown from nature.
          2. ak1978
            ak1978 22 January 2022 03: 35
            -3
            The US has no economy? But. Can you give more specific examples? Maybe the entire Internet has already been transferred to Elbrus and OS Crocodile Gena version Zh5? The West is not homogeneous? Yes. Yes. What is it like? Maybe the Canadian Socialist Republic is at war with the People's Republic of Florida with the help of Scottish volunteers? Or has China stopped accepting dollars and investing in US debt? And it would also be interesting to hear about the homogeneous West in the 1920s and 30s? What is it like? Union of the Weimar Republic and the Kingdom of Bulgaria? Did I miss something?
        2. ak1978
          ak1978 22 January 2022 03: 18
          -2
          All are correct, except for one. The US will never hit. They already control all the resources and the collaborationist government of the Russian Federation. Not in the sense that direct CIA agents are in power, but in the sense that they voluntarily and with songs take out all the acquired and children to the so hated West. And these ultimatums are all theater for the layman.
        3. AndiesemgedankenZiehichallezukunft Ni
          AndiesemgedankenZiehichallezukunft Ni 22 January 2022 03: 30
          0
          Lets rememembr that submarine based tomhawks cand destroy anything precious form a propaganda point of view that russian military has to offer. Tomhawks have already been fitted with EMP coventional charge example to disable anything electronic within several dozens of kms. (or to make military planes such as Su34 fall dawn: probably a more primitive su-24 would resist better vs an EMP detonation) Russia is defenseless vs tomhawks, and USA have thousands of them. MORAL is important.
          1. Baron pardus
            Baron pardus 22 January 2022 08: 09
            +1
            You do realize that Russian air defenses knocked down your beloved rusty "tomahawk" missiles from the skies by dozens, in Syria. You realize that, right? You do realize that Tomahawk is about 30-40 year old design, right? You do realize that Russians, have absolutely the best ECM and ECCM in the world, right? Just ask US Sailors who quit after their ships electronics got fried by SU-24:-).
            1. AndiesemgedankenZiehichallezukunft Ni
              AndiesemgedankenZiehichallezukunft Ni 22 January 2022 15: 09
              0
              Buon per te se ti fa felice pensare questo.....-)
      2. V means B
        V means B 22 January 2022 00: 11
        +2
        What does that say, so what? The fact that we like to drive ourselves into an "unpleasant" situation, and then heroically overcome it? And what has not yet been transmitted and will definitely climb, the testicles of the one who needs sufficient hardness for this?
    4. Zoldat_A
      Zoldat_A 21 January 2022 07: 41
      +11
      Quote: Baron Pardus
      You have already been APPOINTED guilty. And all your negotiations will lead to ANYTHING. Just get ready. And understand - no one will let you explain, or even justify yourself.

      Here, first my father, then how many times I listed the same point by point - and all the time they laughed at us, they said that we are looking for conspiracy theories where there is none. Of course not. For some reason, only from the "Maine" all the white officers went on leave ashore, leaving two hundred blacks. And on some American ships in Pearl Harbor there are no holes with the edges bent inward, only outward. And so - nothing, no conspiracy theory ...

      I recently recalled an anecdote here, let me quote it again - it hurts to the point ...

      Two cows are talking.
      - Listen, it seems to me more and more often that those two-legged ones are looking after us, feeding us, protecting us from wolves only in order to steal our milk. And in the end they will kill and eat us.
      - You this ... Come on, tie it up with your conspiracy ... The whole herd is laughing at your stupid inventions already ...
    5. Wedmak
      Wedmak 21 January 2022 09: 31
      +6
      But I beg you. Why do you think these negotiations were started? Have you set deadlines yet? That's it to bring the Americans to clean water (doubtful, but ..), to provoke, and to fray the nerves a little. All this is already known, at least by how many sanctions have ALREADY been imposed. It is clear and understandable to everyone that the United States cooperate ONLY where it is beneficial for them, a little to the side / they cannot compete honestly / the benefit has disappeared, they begin to bring down the competitor by all means.
      The opinion has already been established that all these sanctions are just an instrument of unfair competition of the type "when a gentleman begins to lose according to his own laws, she begins to change the laws." And that they will grow and increase - do not go to the grandmother.
      In fact, economically, the United States can now do something to us only by crushing its own "arms" and "legs". Or putting a very large EU pig. No, the Americans do not feel sorry for the EU, but the EU is unlikely to be silent on SUCH "hegemon" scams.
      The United States is at great risk by imposing sanctions, it may turn out that, having finally seen and understood how the American gang is doing business, countries will send them away one by one. Not right away, but little by little, but they will. Plus internal tension. And here they can play a cruel joke from a relatively isolated geographical position. Thanks to which they benefited from the wars in Europe and Asia. Only now it will be exactly the opposite.
    6. qpeqop
      qpeqop 21 January 2022 16: 43
      0
      To this list we must add the "twin towers", which collapsed not so much from duralumin passenger liners, capable of breaking through the floor and causing a fire in the worst case, but from TNT laid under the foundation in the right places. They killed so many of their citizens for the sake of politics! There are no elites among those killed. And what about the South Korean Boeing sent to a secret, specially protected zone of the Russians? And what about the notorious flight MH-17, in which traces of explosives planted on board are clear? This is the "real-politician" of the American gangster mafia, which all NATO allies fear more than far-fetched enemies. And yet, personally, I do not regret at all that, by the will of fate, I am on the side of the truth, and I dare to express openly to these bandits everything that I think about them. Otherwise, I'd feel like I'm covered in shit.
  6. Two
    Two 21 January 2022 07: 04
    +7
    Relationships should be mirror-like! But not with this system, in which all the children and grandchildren of the Russian establishment live behind the cordon and run their businesses there. Puffing out cheeks and expressing concern about the aggressive attacks of minke whales is fodder for the people of the past year!
  7. yuriy55
    yuriy55 21 January 2022 07: 04
    +8
    US President: We will consider an attack on Ukraine and the actions of Russian servicemen there who are not dressed in Russian military uniforms

    First: it's time to deal with automatic translation and put the words in the sentence correctly...
    You see what the manifestation of weakness and the "expression of concern" gives ...
    I suppose that it is also time for the President of Russia to consider the attack on Syria by American servicemen, not even dressed in American military uniform, and equate them with terrorist groups.
  8. 75 Sergey
    75 Sergey 21 January 2022 07: 11
    +4
    No, well, then we don’t care, they were considered, anyway we are not going to attack.
    But about the infringement of the rights of Russians and Russian speakers in all territories, then it would be necessary to speak out.
    Kazakhs, Uzbeks, Kyrgyz and Tajiks will get the same.
  9. Andrea
    Andrea 21 January 2022 07: 12
    +4
    Well, who would have doubted. Provocation is everything! The States did not start a single war without provocations, even Pearl Harbor is considered by some to be a grandiose provocation by Roosevelt to persuade Congress to war.
    And for the rest, they will spoil and shed crocodile tears, they offended us, and we are white and fluffy.
    Moreover, after the current ultimatum, they are in an uncomfortable position - they don’t want to give back the stolen and don’t want to look like an aggressor, they are the Shining City on the hill! laughing
  10. Crimean partisan 1974
    Crimean partisan 1974 21 January 2022 07: 16
    +4
    Russian servicemen not wearing Russian military uniforms.
    .... well, it’s wonderful .... the LDNR servicemen have their own uniform and their own insignia ... therefore, you can’t avoid new boilers and all sorts of scum ... oh yes, old man .. burns not like a child
  11. Ingenegr
    Ingenegr 21 January 2022 07: 17
    +10
    The main message of this Biden statement is, in fact, a “good” command for Zelensky and the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Their hands are completely untied - do what you want. The "trunks" were given out, and then spin. We will support and help.
    The old devil knows that hundreds and thousands of people from both sides will go to another world, but when did the "chosen ones" care? After all, they even have the so-called. "human rights" - the lot of the elite.
    PS: In general, it is necessary to decide on the terminology. I suspect that "man" in the Anglo-Saxon world is not an all-encompassing definition of intelligent mammals.
  12. Tusv
    Tusv 21 January 2022 07: 17
    +5
    Phew. They calmed down. And Caliber is not a fig, Russian military personnel and finally don’t wear uniforms. In the event of an invasion of the Armed Forces of Ukraine into the Donbas, the loss of statehood is still hanging in the air
  13. Dimy4
    Dimy4 21 January 2022 07: 41
    +2
    Judging by the map they showed Blinken, the attack and capture had already taken place. Somehow this moment was missed.
  14. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 21 January 2022 07: 46
    +5
    Exclusively in the American style - to reduce the negotiations on security in Europe exclusively to the Ukrainian topic.
    We will consider the attack on Ukraine and the actions there, including the "gray zone", of Russian servicemen not dressed in Russian military uniforms.
    And what about the actions of American, Canadian, British and other uniformed instructors in this zone, how do you propose to consider Russia? Maybe enough already from a sick head to a healthy one?
  15. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 21 January 2022 08: 12
    +5
    US President: We will consider an attack on Ukraine and the actions of Russian servicemen there who are not dressed in Russian military uniforms
    Very nice. Americans can climb the Ruin themselves, but they will say that it is us and sanctions will be imposed against us? recourse It's time to stop reading all that crap and kick them in the brain. Oh, sorry, my "red button" is far from the sofa ...... I would have them ...... repeat
  16. Crimean partisan 1974
    Crimean partisan 1974 21 January 2022 08: 40
    +3
    including the "grey zone", Russian servicemen not dressed in Russian military uniforms.
    .... and no one asked the can the question WHOSE CRIMEA ... that would be interesting ......
  17. bald
    bald 21 January 2022 09: 03
    +2
    The fact that this already unthinking substance blurted out, I think, there’s nothing to talk about - we bend our line (and they will work out all the henchmen on record) - they want war - they will - they are already stuttering from lies.
  18. Woodman
    Woodman 21 January 2022 09: 09
    +2
    He noted exactly what actions he intends to consider an invasion.

    According to Joe Biden, this will not only be the movement of Russian troops across Ukrainian territory, but also cyber attacks against Ukraine.
    These statements are similar to the panic in Washington.
  19. riwas
    riwas 21 January 2022 09: 14
    +2
    US President: We will consider an attack on Ukraine and the actions of Russian servicemen there who are not dressed in Russian military uniforms

    Long overdue. It is not a military secret for anyone that there are Russian volunteers in the Donbass and not only Russian ones.
  20. megadeth
    megadeth 21 January 2022 10: 12
    +4
    This old senile is already sick, this grandfather on batteries can’t even read what they print in 48 font ... That is, all the military personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, according to the grandfather’s statement, are Russians, we’ll decide on that ... Patience to our V.V. . Putin, with whom you have to communicate...???!!!
  21. Egoza
    Egoza 21 January 2022 10: 50
    +3
    With such statements, the United States is trying to justify all the former and current president of Ukraine for 8 years of war in the Donbass! Of course, it was not volunteers who fought, but disguised Russians. So the United States knowingly transferred weapons and imposed sanctions!
  22. amr
    amr 21 January 2022 12: 22
    -5
    Quote: ser-pov
    I'm just wondering how your guys in the US are going to survive! We are not Spain, not Iraq, not Libya, etc. We are Russians, and that says it all ... If you pass on us (and it’s already clear that your idiots from Congress have gone too far), tanks can climb ...

    don't talk nonsense!!!
    The USSR, unlike Russia, was cool and powerful, and he took off his pants ......
    .... and here is Russia))
    1. qpeqop
      qpeqop 21 January 2022 16: 56
      0
      Eh, Putin would have come 20 years earlier !!!
      1. ak1978
        ak1978 22 January 2022 00: 48
        -2
        Putin has already come 20 years earlier. True, his name was Andropov.
  23. iouris
    iouris 21 January 2022 13: 01
    +2
    We need a clear and persistent threat directly to the United States. Preferably Washington (decision center).
  24. AML
    AML 21 January 2022 14: 06
    +2
    Quote: ser-pov

    Here, of course, I won’t argue with you - everything is true, but there is one BUT ... It’s not possible to come to us just like that, you can significantly get in the teeth .... hi


    As I understand it, you do not consider the reverse action, which can give you both in the teeth and between the eyebrows. Or again, "what are we for?"
  25. Warhead-xnumx
    Warhead-xnumx 21 January 2022 14: 08
    +1
    In recent world history, there was a case when, due to external sanctions, a country started a war in response. True, she eventually lost it, although the beginning was frisky and successful. Japan VS USA.
  26. p0pulivox
    p0pulivox 21 January 2022 14: 38
    -2
    The statement of the President of the United States is, of course, somewhat threateningly provocative, but the main part of the comments is no better ...
  27. mongolian9999
    mongolian9999 21 January 2022 14: 51
    +1
    We must act in their own way. To say, they are ready not only to disarm, but also to sell technologies, but the trouble is, Belarus also wants to buy our technologies. Let's just say whoever brings the most gold will get it. Well, like on Tverskaya in the 90s. :-) Sorry, brother, Batko gave more money. And yours became ours. :-)
  28. ERsytype
    ERsytype 21 January 2022 16: 52
    -2
    And they said the West is terribly afraid of Russia. It doesn't look like it, it doesn't look like it at all. Soon they will openly spit in Lavrov's face and he will wipe himself with a handkerchief and say that the answer will be extremely harsh.
    1. ak1978
      ak1978 21 January 2022 21: 25
      -5
      Notably the sofa burns. Warriors in Warcraft and tanks :))))
      But they were warned that 860 really flying F-35s is somewhat more than a model batch of 12 Su-57s. They made such terrible faces. Ahaha.
      1. V means B
        V means B 22 January 2022 00: 17
        -3
        Why are you f-35 all defective, and they don’t fly at all.
        1. ak1978
          ak1978 22 January 2022 00: 51
          -6
          Yeah. And Javilin's bullshit. And the Stingers are generally knee-deep. Yes, and NATA does not know how to fight from the word at all. Well, just a little Serbia, Iraq twice and Afghan gouged for a couple with Libya and Syria. And neither!
          1. Things
            Things 22 January 2022 13: 29
            0
            None of these countries had a really powerful army and air defense.
            And by the way, why wasn’t Vietnam mentioned, where the States have done their best?!
            1. ak1978
              ak1978 22 January 2022 17: 29
              -2
              Yeah. Crapped out. The USAF sustained approximately 0.4 losses per 1,000 sorties during the conflict, which compared favorably with a 2.0 rate in Korea and a 9.7 figure during World War II. Here is such a powerful air defense.

              Why didn't you mention it? So we are looking at the latest period of history. Since 1991.
              1. Things
                Things 22 January 2022 18: 08
                0
                Well, honestly, can we consider a serious victory over Iraq and Libya?!

                Now, if the States had fought with India or China, then no questions asked
                1. ak1978
                  ak1978 22 January 2022 18: 51
                  0
                  Why would the United States be at war with one of the main economic counterparties? And I gave an example in order to show how the armies, created on the model and likeness of the Soviet, armed with Soviet equipment, were defeated by NATO troops within months, if not weeks. How does the modern Russian army differ from the army of Saddam's Iraq? Less combat experience at the time of the potential defeat. The Russian Federation has only one single argument - ICBMs with nuclear weapons - and then inherited from the USSR. Then they still knew how to produce large-scale issues. Everything. There is nothing more.
                  1. Things
                    Things 22 January 2022 20: 23
                    0
                    What-what?) It was precisely thanks to the Soviet-Russian "school" that the same Vietnamese, for example, gave the Americans a light from the heart.
                    The same is in Yemen - the Houthis are fucking the Saudis and their mercenaries, who were trained by the Americans and are equipped with hyped-up American weapons. And how they rake from the Hussites in slippers: this is a song!
                    Georgians (by 2008) were also trained by NATO and the Americans.
                    As for Iraq, comparing Arabs and Russians is, to put it mildly, incorrect - the warriors of them are still the same.
                    By the way, they ran away from ISIS, flashing their heels the Iraqis, precisely trained by the Americans.
                    And how much crap happens at NATO exercises and special operations of the Americans - you can write a whole anti-Charter there! laughing
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                      1. Things
                        Things 23 January 2022 02: 32
                        0
                        It's clear. In general, Russia needs to crawl to the churchyard, covered with a white sheet!
                        Because there is someone (including imbeciles in the leadership of the States) who believes that there is no one cooler than Americans! laughing
                      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. V means B
      V means B 22 January 2022 00: 16
      -2
      No, he will require a written response.
  29. akarfoxhound
    akarfoxhound 21 January 2022 17: 51
    +1
    Quote: Anchorite
    "Deep invasion", "double invasion" ... Is Biden talking about politics?))

    And ours will add:
    "We, if anything, as in Kazakhstan, will quickly and energetically enter, exit, enter, exit ... until you finish, in the sense of playing the fool" laughing laughing laughing
  30. K-50
    K-50 21 January 2022 20: 18
    0
    US President: We will consider an attack on Ukraine and the actions of Russian servicemen there who are not dressed in Russian military uniforms

    Wait a minute, Bidon!
    And how will you determine that these are Russian servicemen if they are not dressed in the uniform established by the Charter? Will they run around with posters, showing their affiliation?
    Our military with posters do not go. request fellow fellow laughing laughing
  31. Rusticolus
    Rusticolus 21 January 2022 21: 52
    +1
    I wonder what the United States has a payroll of the RF Armed Forces, with personal files? Or will they determine involvement in the RF Armed Forces, as usual, by the high-like method? And then I have one bad person here - a radish. According to Lyubas, a shapeless American saboteur, terrorist, anonist, exhibitionist and, in general, a reptilian. Can I slap him like an enemy of the human race?
    1. ak1978
      ak1978 22 January 2022 00: 54
      -4
      For a couple of packs of green paper, the RF Ministry of Defense will tell you anything with delivery. True, the entire payroll is most likely not, but this is not because of secrecy, but the usual time ... wah))))
  32. Orel
    Orel 21 January 2022 22: 32
    -4
    Biden’s words that Washington is going to consider an “attack on Ukraine” contain an actual hint that Ukraine’s Western “partners” or (and) Ukrainian intelligence services controlled by them are themselves capable of committing a provocation, in order to later pass it off as allegedly the actions of the Russian Federation . The words about considering a cyber attack as an invasion sound almost a direct characteristic of the fact that the main message is anti-Russian sanctions, and they will find a reason overseas. And if they don't find it, they'll stage it.


    Such explanations on VO are always amusing. Listeners of political information must read the news "correctly", so they are explained "how exactly this news should be understood." This is an explanation for those who do not immediately understand what I'm talking about)))
  33. km-21
    km-21 21 January 2022 22: 49
    0
    In this case, Russia gets the right to consider any provocation of the Armed Forces of Ukraine against Donbas as a NATO attack on Russia.
  34. V means B
    V means B 22 January 2022 00: 19
    -1
    Their president says this, but we only have VO readers, and even then not all. And so yes, we are on an equal footing))))
  35. tolmachiev51
    tolmachiev51 22 January 2022 04: 25
    0
    These are the consequences of provocations in the Black Sea, the Sea of ​​Japan - they did not pass the test for "lice", which means you can continue to spin the situation to the point of absurdity. What kind of "ultimatums" if the violator of the state border was released safe and healthy - they lowered themselves below the plinth. We have too many "concerned partners" in power.
  36. Emergency
    Emergency 22 January 2022 10: 50
    0
    Count as you like, you old idiot!