Two-link transporters in the Russian army

12
Two-link transporters in the Russian army

Transport all-terrain vehicle TTM-4902PS-10 "Ruslan". Photo by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

A few years ago, two-link articulated transporters of various models began to arrive in parts of the Russian army. This technique is intended for the transport of people and goods, and more recently it has been used as a base for various weapons. Together with such machines, the army receives new important capabilities of a combat and auxiliary nature.

Two-tier capabilities


Articulated tracked all-terrain vehicles have a number of characteristic advantages over vehicles with one body and a single undercarriage. This allows them to carry more cargo and also provides better off-road and rough terrain performance. Under certain conditions, two-link conveyors are the most successful choice for solving transport and other tasks.




GAZ-3344-20 "Aleut". Photo by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

Two wide track undercarriages dramatically reduce ground pressure compared to conventional designs. This improves cross-country ability and/or creates a load margin. The bodies connected by a controlled swing hitch can move relative to each other, which makes it easier to overcome obstacles. In addition, two buildings can provide more space for cargo and passengers.

Two-link all-terrain vehicles perform well on hard and loose soils, on snow and in a swamp. According to the results of numerous tests, they were recommended for use in units and formations in the Far North and other areas with difficult landscapes. Relevant purchases began several years ago, and new equipment began to gradually replace existing samples with insufficient characteristics.


All-terrain vehicle DT-10PM on trials. Photo by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

A full-fledged re-equipment of the Arctic units started in the mid-XNUMXs. All-terrain vehicles of several basic models with different characteristics are supplied. At the first stage, the army purchased only transport equipment, and then the development of full-fledged combat vehicles on articulated chassis began. Some of them have already been adopted, while others are still being tested.

Multipurpose transport


One of the first to supply the northern parts was the TTM-4902PS-10 Ruslan snow and swamp vehicle developed and manufactured by the Nizhny Novgorod plant of transport and technological machines. The first machines of this type entered service in the mid-XNUMXs, and further deliveries continued. It was reported that they were intended for motorized rifle units of the coastal troops of the Northern fleet and should partially replace existing conveyors. Then deliveries were made to other parts.

"Ruslan" is a two-link machine with a total length of approx. 11,6 m and a gross weight of 13,5 tons. The front hull accommodates a power plant based on a 300-horsepower diesel engine and a cargo-passenger cabin, and a part of the transmission units and a larger cabin are located in the rear. In the first link, the all-terrain vehicle carries up to six passengers or the corresponding cargo. The rear cabin can accommodate 18 people or 3 tons of cargo. The possibility of re-equipping the rear cockpit into a command post, a medical unit, etc. was envisaged.


Serial DT-30PM with special equipment. Photo by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

The GAZ-3344-20 Aleut all-terrain vehicle from the Zavolzhsky plant of caterpillar tractors is presented in the same class, the deliveries of which began several years ago. This is a car with a gross weight of approx. 10 t with a load capacity of 3 t (2500 kg on the rear link), capable of carrying up to 20 people. It is equipped with a 185 hp diesel engine, which is sufficient for high cross-country ability and mobility. There is the possibility of swimming due to the rewinding of the tracks.

"Aleuts" were purchased, first of all, for the Arctic and Far Eastern units. Recently, the supply of such equipment to the formations of the Central Military District was announced. The machines are used as vehicles with high cross-country ability and provide a wide range of tasks, incl. combat training.

A number of two-link conveyors are produced by the Ishimbay company Vityaz. In the middle class, it represents the DT-3PB and DT-4P snow and swamp vehicles. These are military vehicles with a carrying capacity of 3-4 tons with the ability to transport personnel and / or install reservations and weapons. Depending on the tasks at hand, such all-terrain vehicles can be equipped with a machine gun or other weapons.


"Vityaz" in comparison with the "Ural". Photo by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

Vityaz also produces all-terrain vehicles DT-10PM. This is a larger machine with a gross weight of 21 tons, the payload of which reaches 10 tons. Transportation of heavy loads and high maneuverability on the ground are provided by a 710 hp diesel engine, hydromechanical transmission and undercarriage with wide tracks. The military modification of the "Vityaz" is equipped with armor and has other characteristic features.

The heaviest in the line of the Ishimbay plant is the DT-30PM conveyor. With its own weight of about 28 tons, it is able to carry a 30-ton load, incl. large dimensions. A 780-horsepower diesel engine was used; the machine has a high cross-country ability and, like other "Knights", is able to swim.


SAM "Tor-M2DT" on the chassis DT-30. Photo by the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation

The military all-terrain vehicle DT-30PM has armor and can be equipped with weapons. It is used as a conveyor or as a basis for special equipment. For example, on the basis of the Vityaz, a field kitchen, a water tank and other logistics support vehicles have been developed and are being produced.

Fighting vehicles


Since recently, articulated platforms have been used to accommodate various weapons. The result of this approach are new military vehicles that combine high mobility in difficult conditions with the required combat qualities.

The redesigned DT-30PM chassis was used to create new anti-aircraft missile systems. By changing the rear hull and installing appropriate combat equipment, the Tor-M2DT and Pantsir-SA air defense systems were created. Such complexes combine the combat qualities of the base "Tora-M2" and "Pantsir-S1" with the high mobility of the articulated platform. To date, these air defense systems have passed the necessary tests and entered the troops.


Arctic "Pantsiri-SA". Photo by the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation

On the basis of a lighter chassis DT-10PM, a promising self-propelled artillery gun "Magnolia" was made. In his case, a reduced rear hull is also used, on which the fighting compartment is installed. A universal 120-mm gun on a two-link chassis will have to increase and expand the fire capabilities of ground units while maintaining the required mobility.

Benefits in various areas


Two-link tracked conveyors are distinguished by a certain complexity of design, but it gives them a number of important features and advantages over other equipment. In some situations, such advantages fully compensate for the complexity and allow you to get the desired results. In particular, it is articulated snow and swamp vehicles that turn out to be perhaps the best transport for remote areas of our country.


Experienced SAO "Magnolia". Photo by Central Research Institute "Burevestnik"

The Russian army is well aware of the advantages of such equipment and has been buying it for quite a long time. All-terrain vehicles of various classes and models capable of solving various combat missions are supplied for supply. At the same time, the development of the direction continues, and now the main goal is to create new models with one or another weapon.

As a result of past and ongoing processes, part of the army formations received or will receive new vehicles for personnel, incl. protected, means of defense and artillery. Perhaps in the future there will be new projects of combat vehicles, conceptually similar to the Pantsir-SA or Magnolia, but involving the use of other weapons.

Thus, it can be argued that modern two-link articulated transporters have found and firmly taken their place in the Russian army. They successfully complemented other techniques of familiar architecture, and then almost ousted it from those areas where they can show the best results. And, apparently, the development of such all-terrain vehicles will continue with positive consequences for the army.
12 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    21 January 2022 05: 54
    I don’t know about the Nizhny Novgorod transporters, but the Ishimbay Vityazi were produced back in the 80s.
  2. +14
    21 January 2022 06: 52
    I had the opportunity to get acquainted with the DT-10 "Vityaz" in 1986-1988.
    The main advantage is high cross-country ability (especially in winter). The winter in the Murmansk region is long.
    There was a case when the MTLs were pulled out when they sat on the "belly".
    It turns out that the guys and I thought correctly about the use of tractors. Their weak point was rubber-metal tracks.
    Low ground pressure is useful for the tundra of the Kola Peninsula. All the surroundings of Pechenga and Luostari, the entire Rybachy was covered with traces of our valiant tractors (even tanks) ... And the northern nature has one peculiarity - it slowly “heals” wounds. If anyone has been to these places, they can confirm that around the German "Parovarskaya" road in the eighties there were ruts from German equipment ... Not to mention the battlefields ...
    It is good that such an important issue was given due attention.
    1. +3
      22 January 2022 10: 59
      We were always frightened by Pechenga in training. It was in 1986, VUS mechvod DT-10P.
  3. +4
    21 January 2022 07: 05
    I don’t understand why you need to buy assorted classmates.
  4. +3
    21 January 2022 08: 36
    It is interesting to know whether this equipment will be supplied to my valiant 61st Marine Brigade. When I was serving in it, the bulk of the mobile equipment was the BTR-82A, and as a heavy motorized league.
  5. +4
    21 January 2022 11: 52
    Well, after the development and implementation of the Tor-M2DT, Pantsir-SA and SAO Magnolia two-link air defense systems, it would be logical to continue the line of combat vehicles based on two-link transporters. For example, light MLRS, KShM, communications, electronic warfare, UAV control, and so on.
  6. +8
    21 January 2022 12: 09
    An articulated technique has advantages and disadvantages.

    Advantages:
    1. cross-country - recognized and already achieved in many working designs ..
    2. transportability on the railway - can allow to break the super-heavy equipment that does not fit on the railway platform into smaller parts.
    This possibility is only hypothetical - I do not know such constructions in real life.

    Disadvantages:
    1. Complexity and, accordingly, high cost.
    2. Less maneuverability. It is difficult to turn around and it is almost impossible to do it on the spot.

    In my opinion, it is possible to strengthen the advantages and weaken the disadvantages only when using electric movement:
    In the main module (for example, with weapons) are only electric motors, and (optionally) batteries.
    In the transport-generator module (TGM) is a generator.

    This separation:
    1.Allows you to get rid of the complex joint transmitting mechanical traction between the modules.
    2.can potentially lead to the unification of TGM, which will give mass character, cheapness., Simplification of modernization.
    3. reduce maneuverability problems,
    since the modules will be easier and faster to separate and combine, as well as due to the fact that electric motors have the same reverse characteristics as the front ones (with a mechanical transmission this can only be achieved by complicating it)
    4. Allows you to vary the TGM depending on the current task - when transporting along the highway, some (for example, wheeled), on rough terrain - others (tracked), etc.
    It will be possible to combine tracked modules with wheeled ones.

    The niche of such machines is only where the disadvantages of such a scheme are minimal, and the advantages are maximum.
    These are (heavy) self-propelled guns, air defense systems, ZAK, MLRS, medium-range missile systems

    Since the tank maneuverability is one of the main properties, then for them a two-link layout is not acceptable.
    1. +1
      22 January 2022 14: 02
      1) The complexity of the articulation is not at all in the mechanical transmission that transmits torque to the trailer, because there is nothing besides the CV joint, and this thing is extremely banal in our time, in each front-wheel drive passenger car there are two pieces. And the difficulty lies in the kinematic mechanism on hydraulic cylinders, which allows you to set the angles between the links horizontally and vertically. And, as far as I understand (correct me if I'm wrong), this mechanism is designed to increase (relative to a conventional hinged trailer) maneuverability during turns and generally increase cross-country ability.
      2) The electric motor will not replace the entire transmission, it will only replace the transmission unit between the links and greatly simplify the gearbox. But at the same time, one more gearbox will be introduced in the trailer (albeit the simplest one), two expensive electric motors, an expensive generator, expensive power electronics. What will be cheaper and more reliable is another question. I would bet on fur. transmission. But it is not exactly.
      2) The electric motor occupies a large volume. And if for existing structures the transmission is completely placed in the frame, between the tracks, then the electric motor + transmission will no longer fit there, you will have to place the electric motor in the body, which is equivalent to lengthening the body, which means an increase in the mass of the trailer itself (in addition to the mass of the electric motor).
      Those. your decision, on the contrary, reduces the maneuverability during turns and the patency of difficult terrain. And, here it is debatable, it increases the mass of the entire structure - we remove the hydraulics, add an electrician and the mass of the trailer. What is heavier is a question, but I would again bet on fur. transmission.
      What remains in the undeniable plus? Modularity. Theoretically, it may not be bad, but judging by the practice of introducing modularity in the fleet, for some reason this idea does not work in modern realities.
      Quote: Lontus
      Since the tank maneuverability is one of the main properties, then for them a two-link layout is not acceptable.

      I would argue here. Increasing the mass of tanks to 100 tons or more is vital. Yes, it’s just that it’s difficult to scale the classic layout - you get either a stupid Mouse-type shed with a gigantic mass and extremely mediocre armor, or a long log (to reduce the frontal projection and keep the specific pressure on the ground) with no cross-country ability. And here an articulated layout can help, which will allow you to get a small frontal projection, a large overall length, spacing of shells and crew, a large ammo capacity, and at the same time excellent cross-country ability and maneuverability (with the exception of turning on the spot).
    2. 0
      23 January 2022 05: 27
      And why does such a technique need a U-turn on the spot? Moreover. neither the T-72 nor the T-90 can turn around "on the spot" with multidirectional movement of the tracks.
      An electric drive (a combination with an internal combustion engine) is generally a controversial thing today. Just by analogy with civilian technology. It is used only in huge mining dump trucks.
      And why is it only about heavy equipment? The Finns quite exploit the same NA-140 BT.
  7. 0
    23 January 2022 05: 04
    Two wide track undercarriages dramatically reduce ground pressure compared to conventional designs.
    What is this from? Well, purely hypothetically. The conveyor in the same dimensions, but only one pair of caterpillars, will have a lower specific pressure.
    1. +4
      27 January 2022 05: 39
      Quote: Monar
      Two wide track undercarriages dramatically reduce ground pressure compared to conventional designs.
      What is this from? Well, purely hypothetically. The conveyor in the same dimensions, but only one pair of caterpillars, will have a lower specific pressure.

      In theory, you are right.
      But with a long length, a single-link tracked vehicle will be too complicated and clumsy.
      And the articulated technique allows you to increase the length and, accordingly, the area of ​​​​the tracks, which will reduce the pressure.
      For example, a single-link vehicle with a track area like the DT-30,
      it would be completely monstrous and would have big problems with maneuverability and maintenance.
  8. 0
    27 March 2022 11: 55
    I have been driving on a personal all-wheel drive for the 25th year. I started, like many others, with a short "Niva", then it went and went, then 3 years ago I disgraced myself: the girl got stuck on the van, got behind the wheel, I was too lazy to hook the towing line, I thought I would jump out into the buildup. Yeah, and the automatic transmission is in my drawbar, which you don’t think about on all-wheel drive, on mono it is at the forefront. I had to start mine and take it out. Why did I say this. When I read the article and looked at the Ishimbai monster, one of my first thoughts was how to pull it out if you plant it and where can I find such a tractor that will pull it out? Those who drive all-wheel drive will understand, sometimes they find feelings of euphoria and permissiveness when you rush through such gullies and surfaces, in principle, not intended for wheeled vehicles. The result is almost always the same, with different interpretations: a shovel, a live or mechanical winch, and as the pinnacle of adventure - a tractor or something more passable. And yes, to ride from the heart.