Trump Reincarnation

38

Photo: Gage Skidmore / flickr.com

The old robbers


The luxurious appearance of Donald Trump in public after a year-long pause can be considered both unexpected and sensational. But, most likely, it is very timely. Indeed, in addition to the presidential elections, which are still three years away, there is something else on the current agenda now.

First of all, the elections to the Congress. No, the ex-president is unlikely to be moved there, but Trump will be an excellent catalyst for attention to other Republicans. Moreover, his party still has a serious personnel shortage, which will be discussed below.



The Democrats with cadres are in a little better position. In addition, the direct heiress of the current owner of the White House, Kamala Harris, will not catch up not only to the level of Barack Obama, but even to her patron. Her popularity and ratings are bad, and, perhaps, everything is in order only with charisma - but this is only in the personal opinion of the author.

Joseph Biden has already had to make it clear that his second term is in doubt, but the current official leader did not dare to call K. Harris the future candidate from the Democratic Party just as directly. Or just not in a hurry.

It is clear that Biden himself is already embarrassed by age, and although Trump is only three and a half years younger, in energy and charisma the 45th president again, like a little over a year ago, outperforms the 46th. And now he doesn’t have behind him the burden of losses from the covid, comparable to the losses in the world wars, there is no indistinct economic plume after the anti-covid measures.

And many are amused by the very fact that for the second term after the first resignation, "playboy Donald" will go at exactly the same age as Joe Biden went. Only now, as if this one then did not fall asleep periodically at the post.

Donald Trump, and after him the Republican Party, decided not to put off until later the use of the fact that even now the decisive majority of Americans are aware that with the advent of Biden, and most importantly, the Democrats, things have not improved. Significantly worse - too, although Trump was able to "knock down on the fly" just with promises of the best.

This has never happened in America, but now a number of analysts are quite seriously saying that it is time for the Democrats to call old Barack, ex-President Obama, to the forefront. And not necessarily against Trump. Although the presidential elections are still very far away, it is impossible to exclude the upcoming duel of the two "former" old robbers.


Photo: Gage Skidmore / flickr.com

But that's something else - in the States they started talking seriously about the prospect of the return of the "bat Hillary" - Mrs. Clinton, the former Secretary of State with B. Obama, and by no means the former wife of former President Bill Clinton. And it will really be something if the 2024 elections suddenly become a repeat of the 2016 elections.

Obama and Trumpism


By removing Trump after just one presidential term, which is a rarity in the United States, the Democrats seemed to have to return to the course of Barack Obama. Especially since Joe Biden was his permanent and quite successful vice. However, you have to, but you don't have to.

And transparent hints have already been used that the best of Trump should not be broken, moreover, under a very convenient slogan - "we don't have bad presidents." It was precisely the Trump administration that was criticized for being too hasty to deal with the legacy of the Democrats, but rather, Barack Obama personally.

Everything that Trump broke, Joe Biden is no longer able to fix, but it would be nice to figure out what is common and different in the courses of the two predecessors of the current owner of the White House.

Let's start with the fact that by definition there cannot be a really fundamental strategic difference in the programs of presidents, regardless of their party affiliation.

However, the differences are strongly emphasized by the two parties and hyped by the press. America, on the other hand, needs to be constantly reminded that the two-party system is not a decoration, but the most convincing confirmation of loyalty to democratic values.

So the pro-democratic media remind of the “real obamstvo”, and with enviable regularity.

About the social orientation of Obama's reforms in medicine and clearing the rubble in a large American mortgage, as well as the ability to maneuver on external fronts, up to the notorious nuclear deal.

And in response - about the bet on a strong farmer and an average entrepreneur from the outback, made by Donald Trump. In economics, they also emphasize that the Democrats and Obama have always believed in the great strength of the dollar, just as Gaidar believes in the iron hand of the market.

How successful was the introduction of elementary order in the financial environment after the 2008 crisis, which was carried out just under Obama, is a moot point, but the financiers themselves were certainly pleased with it. This is confirmed by the turn of the bankers to face Biden even before the 2020 elections.


And this is despite all the benefits and preferences from Trump in exchange for the full support of the real sector.

Of course, a non-establishment Republican like Trump would simply not be allowed to repeat many of Obama's tricks, such as the famous "helicopter money drop."

Let me remind you that this was the so-called “Wall Street operation”, which was carried out by the Federal Reserve System, when trillions of dollars were pumped into the US economy due to extremely low interest rates. And instead of punishing presumptuous bankers and speculators, millions of simpletons with mortgages had to answer with hard-earned dollars.

Trump then had to make do with the support of the majority, relying on tough protectionism, as well as giving a damn about US leadership in globalization. On the external fronts - trade wars, on the internal - the refusal to finance programs in favor of those who themselves do not want to bring benefits, if not material, then at least moral.

Are the Republicans ready?


It is characteristic that many note how Trumpism has already begun to return, although so far no one has even seriously formulated its key provisions.

The readiness to return the "obamstvo" has long been declared, and Barack Obama himself has already made a public return - almost in unison with Trump's rallies, he flashed several times not behind his back, but simply at Joe Biden's shoulder.

Who is behind the leaders, it seems, does not know in America itself, even in the Republican Party. We won’t get personal in detail, although here it’s worth at least recalling former Vice President Michael Pence (Trump's last case) or sharp and frisky Senator Ted Cruz with his regular failures with the vote of a particular bill.

Not counting, of course, the latest success, which is very dubious, with a defense budget without sanctions against Nord Stream 2. Pence and Cruz, however, are even worse off with popularity than Biden and his vice-Harris. Ratings do not even reach 10 percent.

The leaders there are completely unknown abroad natives of Florida - Governor Ron DeSantis and two senators - Marco Rubio and Rick Scott. But where are they with their in-depth interest in domestic affairs before the flamboyant Trump. As you can see, this "returner" decided not by chance to recall the notorious "hand of Moscow" in his first public speech.

It is only strange why the Russian media supported him so sluggishly. It was not worth expecting anything else from the Americans, they generally left this bone for bloggers and social media activists. Moreover, the time for harsh rhetoric against Donald Trump personally and his stubborn associates in the Republican Party has by no means passed.

No, such things as "they prevent the Democratic administration from clearing the rubble" take place regularly. But the strongest epithets will be used already before the next elections, which are to be held in November. Then the entire House of Representatives will be re-elected, which is 435 people, and a third of the Senate - 34 people out of 100.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    23 January 2022 05: 34
    Yes, their relationship is easy to misunderstand.
    1. +9
      23 January 2022 06: 29
      their relationship is easy to misunderstand

      laughing And don’t say ... A decent-looking country, but for 200 years it has not learned how to choose a king. Savages. They knit hand and foot by Congress. Tfu. The wrong king went, the wrong one. Watery.
      1. -8
        23 January 2022 10: 34
        What are you going to tell right now that in fact in the USA it is secret behind the scenes to steer the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, etc., reptilians.
        But in fact, we see the real competition from different groups and clans in the legitimate field, which allows the United States to exist for two centuries without civil wars and disasters.
        1. +11
          23 January 2022 10: 40
          which allows the United States to exist for two centuries without civil wars and disasters.

          Well, well, don't overdo it. laughing In fact, the United States is saved by their geographical position, and not by miraculous parliamentarism. Pump up Mexico, or Brazil, to the level of China - and get amazing things up to dictatorships in both Americas. . winkEven the Fuhrer with the mustache in Washington.
          1. 0
            23 January 2022 10: 49
            Even the Fuhrer with the mustache in Washington.


            How to get it if they have a president according to the constitution for a maximum of eight years, and the governors are not dependent on the president at all and can send it live (which the governor of Florida did not so long ago), but what are the governors, the state secretary can send the president ( as it was with Trump) there is still a separate congress and the senate, plus elected judges, state prosecutors, and geography plays a secondary role here.
            But probably (since nothing lasts forever) someday their system should fail and be outdated for the new reality.
            1. +3
              23 January 2022 10: 56
              How to get it if they have a president, according to the constitution, sits for eight years maximum,

              Ouch ! Directly the constitution is the "Law of universal gravitation". Well, there's no way around it or changing it. They cut off the heads of the kings, and then they will stop. Come on you. There will be a threat to the country - they will change everything in one fell swoop and forget about the interfering constitution, if only to survive.
              1. +1
                23 January 2022 18: 49
                They have everything written down in case of a threat, and I don’t know what will happen in the future, even the super-great experts at VO and in the world did not expect events in Kazakhstan, and what will happen in the USA, all the more so, but that’s what was and what is quite visible.

                And their constitution can also be changed, but here one "Tereshkova" is not enough.
            2. 0
              25 January 2022 13: 49
              How to get it if their president, according to the constitution, sits for eight years maximum

              Not by the constitution, but by constitutional amendment. They already seem to have experience with amendments that cancel other amendments.
              1. 0
                25 January 2022 13: 59
                Of course, there were amendments, but you can read the procedure for adopting amendments to the constitution, a rather complicated procedure.
                1. 0
                  25 January 2022 14: 03
                  But quite doable. Truman didn't seem to have much of a problem.
        2. +1
          23 January 2022 20: 33
          competition...

          The struggle was especially spectacular between the dead, who lived 200 years ago and voted in the elections. I hope the dead voted on both sides, Democrats and Republicans? And yes, everything is democratic ...)
        3. +1
          23 January 2022 21: 31
          Quote: ViacheslavS
          legitimate field,

          Uh-huh...beginning with Watergate and so on....
          one naked legitimacy ....
          The dead who voted, bribing voters, burned ballots and so on
          Quote: ViacheslavS
          to exist for two centuries without civil wars and disasters

          Bombing of Negro protests by combat aircraft? Driving their Japanese citizens into camps?
      2. +1
        24 January 2022 06: 29
        And what good is the turnover of the leader as in the states? Obama carried out the health care reform, the so-called Obamacare, Trump came and buried everything, and so constantly, the eternal war between the parties, and the matter stands still, sheer agreements to the detriment of ordinary Americans. Complete rubbish. And given our specifics, this would be an eternal redistribution of financial flows and assets from those in power, and we are suffering in any way or that way.
    2. -2
      23 January 2022 19: 45
      The establishment of both parties is on the verge of total rejuvenation) and since the Democrats are the heralds of the British crown, including Biden’s “noble British blood”), I won’t be surprised if Kamala Harris turns out to be an ordinary political phantom by the next presidential election, promoting the image of a very real candidate Meghan Markle, for example) and all this dog song around discord in the royal family is just part of the soap drama, which they began to slowly shove into the mattress inhabitants)
  2. +4
    23 January 2022 06: 08
    It’s only strange why Russian hackers supported him so sluggishly
    1. +8
      23 January 2022 06: 12
      Quote: avaks111
      It’s only strange why Russian hackers supported him so sluggishly

      our "hackers" are busy with some kind of Swedish community of lumberjacks .. once they ..))))))
      1. +1
        23 January 2022 15: 24
        You're joking in vain. Maybe that community of lumberjacks is the secret center of the world behind the scenes. smile
        1. +1
          25 January 2022 14: 01
          So there then beginners should be sent.
  3. +5
    23 January 2022 06: 23
    it is very timely
    Even more timely after the flight from Afghanistan, difficult relations with Russia, rising inflation in the United States, flourishing discrimination against whites (only one order of medical care is worth it), ferment in the camp of democrats. Apparently, Trump will stir up America once again and perhaps for a long time.
  4. +9
    23 January 2022 06: 55
    Most of our ordinary Republicans at the moment want to see either a Trump/DeSantis couple or DeSantis and Koisti Noem (South Dakota governor). Pence, there is no trust in him. Cruz is a populist talker. The Republican elite is not happy, of course, but they will have nowhere to go, since the voter will not support others.
    I am very interested to see the results of the midterm elections Liz Cheney - who openly took the side of the Democrats and against Trump.
    She lives here not far from us in Wyoming, so we have heard a lot.
  5. +8
    23 January 2022 07: 42
    The "king" in the USA is "made by the retinue" - advisers, and they are all Russophobes, no matter who they elect for president. So for Russia, by and large, nothing changes.
    1. 0
      23 January 2022 16: 20
      Russophobes can be adequate and inadequate.
  6. 0
    23 January 2022 08: 34
    if we compare the possibilities of modern America and modern Russia, then the possibility of America
    choosing any of the five or six well-known presidential candidates will not turn the country upside down the way it will happen if in Russia one of the well-known five or six candidates is elected President, but not Putin. There is no alternative to Putin in Russia! And who else besides Putin Zyuganov or, God forbid, Mironov, or the old Zhirinovsky, or Yavlinsky with an expired shelf life?
    Undoubtedly, in their private and private terms, American politicians and the electorate understand that America needs a President like Putin. Moreover, the entire EU and Britain are secretly jealous of Russia under their noses that they do not have such a leader as Russia has now. But the EU, the USA and Britain will quietly swallow the snot and officially continue to vilify both Russia and Putin.
    1. +10
      23 January 2022 08: 53
      Quote: north 2
      There is no alternative to Putin in Russia!

      Is that okay? And what will happen if you turn on the TV in the evening and Swan Lake will be broadcast on all channels there?
      And who is to blame for the fact that there is no alternative? Maybe the government itself is doing so that it would not exist?
  7. -3
    23 January 2022 08: 41
    Yes, it's sad. Farting on the presidential chair, it is, of course, good, at his age. But still more at ease on the couch. А ведь всё началось с ниггера и жены любителей Моник. Then it became clear that the United States had a little left. Let's see.
    1. +8
      23 January 2022 08: 56
      Quote: Borisych
      Then it became clear that the United States had a little left.

      I've been listening to this story for 50 years.
    2. +3
      23 January 2022 10: 37
      when it became clear that the United States had a little left. Let's see.


      Many of those who spoke about the imminent collapse of the United States have long been buried in the Kremlin wall, but the States have not collapsed in any way. The main problem is from a misunderstanding of the internal structure of the United States and the projection of Russian reality, where all power is concentrated in the hands of a narrow group of people.
  8. +2
    23 January 2022 10: 38
    But it's funny how "no" Kamala Harris turned out to be in the position of vice president, how many expectations there were and, in fact, such "incompetence" that she even dropped out of the "left" media, which traditionally drowned for the Democrats.
    1. 0
      23 January 2022 15: 32
      I don't understand why there were expectations. As far as I understood the American system (maybe erroneously), then the vice president has less rights than the first lady. The only PMSM explanation for "incompetence" is that Harris was put in charge of Biden, but she did not live up to expectations.
  9. +4
    23 January 2022 10: 55
    The world is always driven by youth. It is they who have the right to create a new one. In the spring, new young shoots appear in the forest, which grow and bear fruit. Old, rotten, dry plants only hinder their growth and serve as food for parasites... You don't need to breed gerontophilia.
    Enough, have a look! 70 years is the most extreme age for any statesman ... Let him start collecting scattered stones ...
  10. -1
    23 January 2022 12: 25
    Let them gnaw through each other's throats - sincerely happy for them.
  11. +2
    23 January 2022 12: 58
    And what, Trump is our President???
    The same enemy as all the others ....
    The striped can't have any other policy other than wanting to make everyone splash their tune, that's invariable.
  12. +1
    23 January 2022 13: 16
    Quote: ViacheslavS
    How to get it if their president, according to the constitution, sits for eight years maximum

    Not that.
    The twenty-second amendment to the US Constitution was adopted by Congress on March 21, 1947 and ratified by the required number of states on February 7, 1951.


    And naive suckers believe that this has always been the case and this is the reason for "real" democracy. It’s just that the establishment realized that the people had become too independent in choosing (unlike those times when mayors and governors controlled local information among the population through a local newspaper or two), and some Roosevelt, having gained popularity, could really do without approval of the "best people of the state". With the advent of an affordable radio in every home, the information blockade of the establishment ceased to be 100%. It took a fuse in the form of 2 terms. And even then, they couldn’t even stand Kennedy for so long, and his popularity was such that no “raped maids” would have helped. Now they have already worked out the technology, and do not allow potential Roosevelts and Kennedys to the final elections. Although Trump leaked out, at the initial stage he was doused with slops and was not allowed to do anything, and "the radio in every house" was able to be taken under general control. If not for the Internet, which they took care of after the elections, and their billions, Trump would not have slipped through the "primaries".
  13. +1
    23 January 2022 15: 05
    Hmm ..
    There is no rejuvenation in both parties.
    Only, we have Trump, and you have Biden.
    Who will be the first of the old people to understand that there are no wars in the party, and a single composition is strength.
    That party will steer, but an example to citizens.
  14. 0
    23 January 2022 16: 43
    Trump's re-coronation of ours: we are Republicans. Archiologically.
  15. 0
    23 January 2022 17: 53
    Trump is too independent and unpredictable for the elite. What can he give out on-mountain question. One good thing is that he does not care about everyone except the United States. Therefore, for him, both NATO and Ukraine are a secondary issue.
  16. +1
    23 January 2022 19: 19
    IMHO, Mr. Trump is first and foremost a businessman.
    And if we consider the nomination of candidates for the US President as a business project, then everything is fine here, regardless of the result.

    Voila, past election data:
    "Three months before the US presidential election, the total costs of candidates for the campaign exceeded $1 billion. American experts are confident that this time the $2 billion mark will be overcome - the elections will become the most expensive in the history of the United States.
    ...
    So far, the lion's share of the $1 billion — about $850 million — is in support of Donald Trump and the Republican Party. Since 2017, the Republican Party, its donors, sponsors, and Donald Trump himself have begun to prepare for this year's elections, after which Trump hopes to stay in the presidency. In turn, his rival Joseph Biden only officially became a candidate from the Democratic Party in June, so by this time “only” about $160 million had been spent on his support.
    https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4441670

    In this election, judging by the dynamics, Trump's budget will be well over $1 (if he gets to the Republican Party nomination).
    Bravo Mr Trump!
    good
  17. 0
    23 January 2022 21: 17
    Maybe Blinkin for president or Jane P.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"