Restless Kazakhstan as a reason for the birth of the "Turkic NATO"

22

Source: danilevsky.ru

Ankara should be the center of the compass


The fact that the Turks have long been nurturing the ideas of actual revanchism and dreaming of expanding the borders to the scale of the Ottoman Empire has long been said.

At one time, Erdogan dispersed more or less intelligent military men, imprisoned many of them, leaving predominantly ardent nationalists in power. It was in this environment, with the active support of the President of Turkey himself, that the idea of ​​the pan-Turkist army of Turan was born.



In the president's head is the "Great Turan", stretching from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean. Such a scale can only be achieved by military means.

While Ankara is trying to subjugate the countries of Central Asia, several years ago agreements on military cooperation were signed with Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. There are plans to expand the union with Kyrgyzstan, Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan in a similar way.

At the same time, Erdogan already has a prototype of a military alliance - an organization of Turkic states, which includes, in addition to Turkey, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan. In the status of observers, Turkmenistan and "truly Turkic" Hungary.

The military successes of the Azerbaijani-Turkish duet in Nagorno-Karabakh give a special flavor to the activities of the Turkic Union. The conflict was even given the pretentious name "44-day Patriotic War for the liberation of the occupied territories."

It was then that the ardent nationalist Devlet Bahceli presented the Turkish president with the infamous map of the "Great Turan", which included a good part of the Urals, Western and Eastern Siberia.

This clearly turned Erdogan’s head, and last year a significant session of the organization of Turkic states took place, during which the “Civil Defense Mechanism” was decided. Such an ornate term denoted a structure within the organization that has a paramilitary status and is the forerunner of the real "Army of Turan."

It must be understood that Turkish politicians have to act very carefully - with their "Great Turan" they attack the ambitions of both Russia and China. Not only is a military bloc being built near the Russian borders, but confusion is also being introduced among Moscow's partners.

For example, Kazakhstan, which is part of the CSTO on an equal footing with Armenia, but is friends against it with Azerbaijan and Kyrgyzstan, is already in the structure of the Great Turan. Bishkek, by the way, is also part of the CSTO. The realities of Central Asian diplomacy, thickly mixed with local color and contradictions.

Restless Kazakhstan looks like a reason for the birth of the "Turkic NATO". But in the light of the latest Kazakh unrest, the civil defense mechanism of the Turkic organization failed - Tokayev called for help not from Erdogan, but from the CSTO, that is, Putin.

But it was in Kazakhstan last autumn that the Turan Special Economic Zone (TURANSEZ) was created - Turkey has always placed special stakes on the Kazakhstani case in foreign policy.

Still, a strategically advantageous position and in the very immediate vicinity of Russia, which Erdogan both dislikes and is afraid of.

But the protector of all without exception the Turkic peoples in the world, which Turkey exposes itself, turned out to be out of work.

Rather, to the "army of Turan"


The first to remind Erdogan of the need to return to the idea of ​​the "Army of Turan", and not the emasculated "civil defense", was the former rear admiral with the speaking name Cihat Yaycı.

Now he is retired, but, although he heads the Center for Marine and Global Strategy Studies, it is worth listening to his words with a certain degree of conventionality - such hawks can say a lot of things.

On January 12, Yayci gave an interview to the Turkish nationalist newspaper Yeni Akit about the growing influence of the CSTO in the territory that, by law, should belong to the "Great Turan".

They say that the real mission of Russia, Belarus, Kyrgyzstan and Armenia was not the protection of strategic facilities from marauders and bandits, but the occupation of Turkey's strategic partner.

And Ankara has no legal grounds for intervention, since there is no military bloc among the Turks. Now, if Erdogan had tried earlier, everything could have been much more beautiful. At least not worse than what happened in Nagorno-Karabakh.

The Turks have no choice but to silently observe how the peacekeeping contingent from Armenia puts things in order on the Turkic territory. Otherwise, as a personal insult, Yaiji could not accept such a turn.

Another adherent of the wondrous Turkic world, retired Major General Yusel Karauz, generally threatens the Turkish leadership with a possible repetition of the Kazakh events in one of the neighboring republics. And here again the trump card of the Kremlin will play, skillfully using the resources of the CSTO.

The counterbalance should be our own “Army of Turan”, created on a coalition basis, which means that it allows us to invade foreign countries without obstacles. Small steps to the "Great Turan" from the Mediterranean Sea to the Pacific Ocean.

According to Karauz, there is nowhere to retreat and

At the very first meeting of the Organization of Turkic States, legal measures should be taken regarding the creation of a joint military force. For this, real steps must be taken. If we are late, we may suffer irreparable damage. What is happening now in Kazakhstan can happen in other fraternal republics.

You won't envy Erdogan now at all.

From all sides, nationalists of varying degrees of licentiousness blame him for the fact that the CSTO entered Kazakhstan, and not the "Turkic Islamic army."

Such, for example, are the deputy of the Majlis Yavuz Agyralioglu and the authors of the printed mouthpiece of local nationalists, the newspaper Akit. In Kazakhstan, what the Turks should have been most afraid of happened - this is the opinion of the quite respectable daily newspaper Türkiye.

Even Turkish officials are openly hinting at the need for a military unification of the Turks.

So, on January 11, at an emergency meeting of the Council of Ministers of the Organization of Turkic States, Mevlut Cavusoglu, the head of the foreign policy department, said:

Within the organization, cooperation between security and intelligence units should be more organized and institutionalized.

That is, the militarization of a purely political association was actually given the green light. At least in the Foreign Ministry.

What threatens the emergence of another NATO near the borders of Russia?

Firstly, the first victim will be Armenia, which the most orthodox Turkish nationalists of Turkey cannot bear organically.

Armenians, by the way, quite rightly call their country "the main physical barrier preventing the territorial unification of the Turkic world." And the militant Erdogan is used to cracking down on obstacles.

Secondly, signs of the emergence of the "Great Turan" at least destabilize the situation in Russia - it is difficult to imagine how many sympathizers will appear on the wave of unification of the Turkic peoples.

Further developments are difficult to predict, but one thing is clear - Turkish hawks will not be stopped by the reality of the conflict with Russia.

Difficulties with Erdogan can still happen.

And first of all in the economic plane.

Turkey, in the case of the creation of the "Army of Turan", whatever one may say, should become a real hegemon in its region, and this is very expensive.

You will have to constantly lend something irrevocably to someone, keep order, overthrow governments and appoint your deputies. Such "games of thrones" are now beyond the reach of the gradually stagnating Turkish economy.

At the end of last year, the lira significantly lost ground, inflation is growing, and the incomes of the Turks, respectively, are declining.

Evil tongues claim that inflation could reach 2022% in 30. The people are slowly grumbling - in Ankara, Istanbul and Izmir there were demonstrations dissatisfied with the economic policy of the leadership.

Of course, things are unlikely to come to a change of government led by Erdogan, but pan-Turkism ambitions will have to be saved. Or unleash another war, which, as you know, will write off everything.
22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    21 January 2022 05: 42
    Nature does not tolerate emptiness. Since we left Asia, then someone else will come there.
    And then to us.
    Many of the "come in large numbers" quite sincerely believe that Siberia is not a Russian land at all and do not hesitate to tell us about it.
    1. +5
      21 January 2022 15: 02
      Quote: Jacket in stock
      And then to us.

      Yes already. On YouTube, in the Russian segment, in the "in trend" tab, Turkish TV series and Uzbek videos began to appear frequently. This is because there are so many Uzbeks in Russia that their requests for Turkish/Uzbek content allow, according to YouTube's algorithms, to display this content in one of the most popular in the Russian Federation.
      At the time of writing the comment, the Turkish series is in 23rd place (and it used to be in the top 10) - you can check.
      And one more thing: President of the Regional Public Organization "St. Petersburg Uzbek Community"Turan"" Alijan Haydarov said that compatriots often use the subway, and navigation in their native language would help to navigate. He noted that "it is best to duplicate the signs at all stations."
    2. -3
      23 January 2022 12: 33
      Well, taking into account the fact that Turkish ears are sticking out in an attempted coup in Kazakhstan, Russia is just returning to Asia
    3. -2
      23 February 2022 21: 28
      Siberia is a region in the Asian part of Russia, "Siberia" literally from the Turkic means "Snowstorm". And there in Siberia, wherever you throw all the Turkic names, and it was not Russian, otherwise Yermak would not have had to capture it from the Siberian Khan! Learn the materiel, and do not forget that Russia was located in a small area, and the capture of foreign lands by the Republic of Ingushetia has backfired on Russia more than once, Chechnya alone has cost and will cost the Russian Federation for a long time. Not to mention Tatarstan! Do not forget that Shoigu is from Tyva, and he is an Uriankhai, a Turk! And they are Uriankhai one of the indigenous peoples of Siberia! And there are Buryats and Mongols and many more Asian peoples! Russia has almost never been an independent state, where does it have the right to Siberia? RI captured these territories by force! Many do not like such statements in the Russian Federation itself. And the attempt to attribute territories to the Russians that did not historically belong to them irritates many small nations inside the Russian Federation, which will ultimately undermine the situation inside, which will play into the hands of external forces! Already now, the country's leadership is leading the Russian Federation to the edge, trying to get involved in an international conflict, in the end, you can take my word for it that some partner from Asia will decide to take this very Siberia to solve the issue of its overpopulation, justifying this with the same reasoning as Putin substantiated the Crimea and the DPR-LPR. Eastern neighbors who pretend to be friends are more dangerous than those who directly declare hostility!
      1. 0
        24 February 2022 03: 41
        Quote from sbar
        Learn materiel

        Good idea. Useful.
        Well, since we remembered history, let's also remember that the Turks are also invaders in Turkey, and the Germans in Germany. And how the Europeans even occupied America and no one has yet managed to forget.
  2. +4
    21 January 2022 06: 09
    Turkey operates where it is not given a blow. There was a fuss in the Mediterranean Sea, it didn’t work out, okay. Our neighbors don’t care who they take money from.
    1. +2
      21 January 2022 09: 43
      Turkey operates where it is not given a thrashing.

      Too smart. Found "fighters", also me. There is an economy, there is a standard of living. Will sit down - where to run the Sultan? The United States already has a ready successor to the throne and a great desire to pinch the tail of an independent Turkey. It means he will rush to bow to Putin, there is nowhere else. Once already pulled out of the loop, you are unlikely to forget this. And most importantly, we need Erdogan. Although he has ambition, he is in "contra" with the USA.
      1. 0
        21 January 2022 11: 43
        Quote: dauria
        There is an economy, there is a standard of living.

        Hello Alexey! hi The roots of economic problems were well analyzed by Konstantin Semin.
  3. +7
    21 January 2022 07: 45
    For example, Kazakhstan, which is part of the CSTO on an equal footing with Armenia, but is friends against it with Azerbaijan and Kyrgyzstan, is already in the structure of the Great Turan. Bishkek, by the way, is also part of the CSTO. The realities of Central Asian diplomacy, thickly mixed with local color and contradictions.

    Because of this paragraph, the feeling that the Great Turan, first of all, is in the author’s head, so he sees it from every hole hi

    In the president's head is the "Great Turan", stretching from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean. Such a scale can only be achieved by military means.
    Even on the map presented to Erdogan, there is no such flight of fancy. But the author, of course, knows better what Erdogan has in his head
  4. +7
    21 January 2022 08: 01
    Further developments are difficult to predict, but one thing is clear - Turkish hawks will not be stopped by the reality of the conflict with Russia.
    Those. all? Will Turkish resorts be closed for Russians, and Russian football clubs will stop traveling to Turkey for training camps? Soon?
  5. +11
    21 January 2022 08: 05
    in Russia it is hard to imagine how many sympathizers will appear on the wave of the unification of the Turkic peoples.
    Why will it appear, already in bulk in Tatarstan, Bashkiria, etc. And who is to blame? Duma that adopts laws on juvenile fool and allowing "cultural exchange, and mutual cultural, religious enrichment" with Turkey, stuffed with terrorists, hard-core Nazi nationalists. angry
  6. +1
    21 January 2022 08: 49
    The European Parliament adopted a resolution on Kazakhstan calling for sanctions and an investigation.

    https://ria.ru/20220120/kazakhstan-1768802177.html
    The European Parliament does not accept anything without the consent of the United States.
  7. +1
    21 January 2022 09: 22
    Restless Kazakhstan looks like a reason for the birth of the "Turkic NATO". But in the light of the latest Kazakh unrest, the civil defense mechanism of the Turkic organization failed - Tokayev called for help not from Erdogan, but from the CSTO, that is, Putin.
    I just want to remind you... strike while the iron is hot!!! No matter how it turned out to be another flaw!
    Let's see ...
  8. -2
    21 January 2022 09: 36
    China is the new owner.
  9. +3
    21 January 2022 10: 13
    For some reason, no one takes into account another player - Iran. quite a combat-ready proxy, but the same Hezbollah with the Houthis ..
  10. +1
    21 January 2022 10: 20
    Or unleash another war, which, as you know, will write off everything.

    With such an environment - Iran, Syria, Egypt, Greece, Russia, only the war was not enough for him. However, why not. Straits would not be superfluous for us
  11. BAI
    +2
    21 January 2022 10: 34
    the first victim will be Armenia, which the most orthodox Turkish nationalists of Turkey cannot bear organically.

    Armenians, by the way, quite rightly call their country "the main physical barrier preventing the territorial unification of the Turkic world." And the militant Erdogan is used to cracking down on obstacles.

    Armenia will be bypassed through Georgia. Adjara is already all Turkish, soon the rest will be bought up.
  12. +3
    21 January 2022 11: 34
    As long as Turkey's GDP is less than ours (approximately 2.5 times) and demographically it represents about 60-65% of our demographics, they will not directly conflict with us. But if we are connected by some major conflict situations, this can happen.
    It is worth taking into account the Ukrainian and Georgian lessons and timely "punching" our allies for overly peppy diplomacy. It will not lead to good.
  13. -1
    21 January 2022 15: 33
    Quote from an explanatory article in the APN, author Dmitry Rodionov:
    Today, the Turkic Chamber of Commerce and Industry, the Turkic Investment Fund, the Trans-Caspian Trade and Transit Corridor, and the Supply Chain Group already operate within the framework of the Turkic Council (which was recently reorganized into the Organization of Turkic - in Turkish, you can read: Turkish states). This is no longer a cultural and historical circle, but a serious organization that claims to compete with the EAEU, there are already talks about a single customs space. At the same time, the Turks have something that we do not have - yes, that same common history, language and culture, which are the most powerful tool of soft politics, which should not be underestimated.
    They have an ideology of Turkic unity. What can we offer? "Russian world"? Absolutely not. Trying to intercept the idea of ​​the “Turkic world”, what does Peskov hint at? The idea is interesting, but it is doubtful that our government will go further in this direction than “trolling”. An alternative could be a powerful supranational ideology, which was the same communism or the current Western democracy (which the “Russian world” in Ukraine lost to smithereens). But we have nothing of the kind, and the idea of ​​"Eurasianism" is still completely empty, devoid of political meaning. The EAEU is a naked economy, and without political and ideological content, this project is doomed to lose to competitors who have this content.
  14. +3
    21 January 2022 20: 23
    Edik, don’t fall for the leftist tales about the great turania .... Grief and horror will be much stronger than attempts to fly to Saratov on bayraktars - no one is waiting there!
  15. 0
    22 January 2022 11: 23
    The Turks need to be reminded that they can be driven back to where they came from and NATO will not help them
  16. 0
    22 January 2022 15: 58
    And Ankara has no legal grounds for intervention, since there is no military bloc among the Turks. Now, if Erdogan had tried earlier, everything could have been much more beautiful. At least not worse than what happened in Nagorno-Karabakh.
    And to intervene in Syria or Libya?
    The problem was not that there were no legal grounds, but that there were no appeals from the leadership of Kazakhstan.
    Secretary of State Bliken: US demanded from Kazakhstan to explain the request for help to the CSTO
    the impression that, according to the scenario, an appeal should have been made not to the CSTO, but, for example, ... to Turkey.
    ---
    According to WarGonzo, “behind the radical core of the Kazakh protest were militants who had worked closely with the Turkish intelligence services back in Syria. These are ethnic Kazakhs who left to fight in the Middle East as part of terrorist groups.”

    According to the scenario, in the midst of the “protest” (which developed into real hostilities), the ex-secretary of the Security Council and the first president of Kazakhstan, Nazarbayev, should have turned to official Ankara for military assistance to restore order in the country. Further, under the auspices of the "Turkic Council", Turkish troops were supposed to enter the country (with the involvement of their proxy - the Armed Forces of Azerbaijan),

    - says the message published in the telegram channel of the project.

    Further: by order of the Turkish special services, the militants would have to stop the armed confrontation, and peace would reign in the republic. Erdogan, accordingly, would have got the laurels of the winner, plus part of the Turkish troops would have remained on the territory of Kazakhstan, which would have dealt a serious blow to the authority of Russia and its role in Central Asia.

    However, this scenario was not destined to come true: Tokayev was ahead of Nazarbayev by less than a day, turning to the CSTO (and in fact to Russia) for help.

    At the same time, WarGonzo notes that “both the Ankara scenario and the Nazarbayev family are directly behind the British military-political elites, who consider Turkey (and Kazakhstan, until recently, too) to be PMC countries under their control.”