Military Review

Lukashenko accused Ukraine of building up troops near the Belarusian borders

33

Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko accused Ukraine of building up troops near the Belarusian borders. Of particular concern to him is the pulling of units of the Ukrainian National Guard to the southern borders of the country, which includes many nationalist-minded radicals.


The agency reports Belarus Sputnik.

The Belarusian president believes that Ukrainian nationalist fighters are much more dangerous than military personnel from NATO countries. At the same time, he considers Kiev's statements that it has concentrated its military near the borders of a neighboring country in order to block the path of illegal immigrants far-fetched. In his opinion, the fight against them is just an excuse, because Ukraine is not a country where citizens of other states seek to settle.

They do not go there and are not going to go to Ukraine, we understand this very well. People flee from Ukraine, and they will "defend themselves from migrants from Belarus"

- said the Belarusian leader.

Lukashenka noted with concern that within the framework of the special operation Polesie, Kiev had concentrated 10 of its troops near the borders of Belarus. And such dynamics show that Ukraine is actively engaged in building up a military group on its northern borders.

Earlier, the Belarusian leader said that about 30 NATO troops are concentrated near the western borders of the state he leads, in Poland and Lithuania. They are equipped with the most modern technology and pose a threat to Belarus.
Photos used:
https://president.gov.by/
33 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. NDR-791
    NDR-791 17 January 2022 13: 26
    +3
    Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko accused Ukraine of building up troops near the Belarusian borders.

    Well, at least someone officially rode them. Otherwise, for some reason, ours cannot accuse NATO of concentrating troops somewhere in Texas.
    1. Tatyana
      Tatyana 17 January 2022 13: 33
      +8
      Lukashenko accused Ukraine of building up troops near the Belarusian borders

      The United States is in a hurry not to miss the opportunity to unleash its PROXY war on and from the territory of Ukraine against Russia and Belarus.
      1. Aerodrome
        Aerodrome 17 January 2022 13: 36
        +12
        Lukashenko accused Ukraine of building up troops near the Belarusian borders
        oh yes, handsome Old Man ... otherwise we all, yes we ... come on, since you sat on our bench, spit a can in the face.
        1. Anatole Klim
          Anatole Klim 17 January 2022 13: 55
          +2
          Quote: Aerodrome
          come on, since I sat down on our bench

          Lukashenka and Putin are a force, what is his statement that they, together with Putin, in detail, developed a peacekeeping operation in Kazakhstan in just an hour. So there is nothing to be afraid of, in half an hour they will develop an operation to protect the Belarusian borders by Russian troops. yes
          1. Naive
            Naive 18 January 2022 00: 03
            0
            I don't get it, is this sarcasm? By the way, the Belarusians (peacekeepers) noticed in the video, unlike their colleagues in balaclavas ... What is this for? What is the explanation for this?
            1. baltiksi
              baltiksi 18 January 2022 19: 52
              +1
              these are the Belarusian punishers of their own people who are embarrassed to show their faces, suddenly their photo will get into the International Court of Justice. Something like this, in Belarus they are far from being heroes.
    2. Vol4ara
      Vol4ara 17 January 2022 18: 10
      -3
      So because we will strike at them from the territory of the Russian Federation and from the territory of Belarus., It is logical that they cover dangerous areas.
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. alex neym_2
    alex neym_2 17 January 2022 13: 31
    +2
    A neighbor with a club runs near your fence and collects the same non-hysterical ones - you will wonder if you should take an ax in your hands?
    1. Xnumx vis
      Xnumx vis 17 January 2022 13: 46
      +1
      Quote: aleks neym_2
      A neighbor with a club runs near your fence and collects the same non-hysterical ones - you will wonder if you should take an ax in your hands?

      Here you will not only take an ax, but you will also start calling friends for help. A union state, no matter how ... Member of the CSTO ...
    2. isv000
      isv000 17 January 2022 15: 57
      0
      Quote: aleks neym_2
      A neighbor with a club runs near your fence and collects the same non-hysterical ones - you will wonder if you should take an ax in your hands?

      It is useful for such "good" neighbors to have a dog. For example, I have a pit bull in charge of security with a set of 42 calibrated arguments in his mouth ...
  5. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 17 January 2022 13: 36
    +1
    Kiev has concentrated 10 thousand of its troops near the borders of Belarus.
    in Poland and Lithuania, there are approximately 30 NATO troops
    Who will say for sure why so many troops are kept on the border?
  6. Thrifty
    Thrifty 17 January 2022 13: 36
    -2
    So, you need to wait there for a provocation, possibly with the "Russian and Belarusian military" who wanted to "invade" the territory of the quasi-understate !!!
    1. Refael
      Refael 18 January 2022 20: 21
      0
      Rather, from the territory of the quasi-statehood.
  7. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 17 January 2022 13: 46
    0
    Lukashenko accused Ukraine of building up troops near the Belarusian borders
    Unexpected move of the APU. Can hit?
    units of the Ukrainian National Guard, which includes many nationalist-minded radicals. 10 тыс.
    On the road do not roll. And then run around the Ruin and collect them one by one. request
  8. The comment was deleted.
    1. YOUR
      YOUR 17 January 2022 14: 29
      +9
      So are Russian troops on their territory. What is the problem?
      1. Lionnvrsk
        Lionnvrsk 17 January 2022 16: 35
        -1
        Quote: YOUR
        What's the problem?

        In Svidomo brain! yes
      2. karish
        karish 17 January 2022 18: 18
        +1
        Quote: YOUR
        So are Russian troops on their territory. What is the problem?

        So it seems to me that there is no problem, why did the dad sweat?
    2. Denis812
      Denis812 17 January 2022 14: 39
      +8
      1. Russian troops are on their territory
      2. 150 t. grouping is not one tent city, which is right on the border with Nezalezhnaya, but a lot of bases that are even beyond Moscow. What "concentration" are we talking about?
      3. Lukashenka spoke about building up forces on the border with his country. This is obviously so. Why can't he talk about it?
    3. bayard
      bayard 17 January 2022 15: 43
      +2
      Quote: karish
      Vsu seems to be on its territory, what's the problem?

      And what is the territory of the Armed Forces of Ukraine?
      And where did she come from in Ukraine?
      After all, the borders were not demarcated, documents were not submitted to the UN ... The UN does not know at all where this state is legally located .... I think if the state (the apparatus of power, control and management) moves somewhere to Canada, then nothing legally does not change for him.
      And the territory on which "Ukraine" and the Armed Forces of Ukraine are now frolicking is Russian. And legally, and historically, and by national composition - there all people (except for foreigners) are Russians, in extreme cases, Russians (little Russians) - so legally correct.
      And Ukraine and Ukrainians are a political movement and a fictional nationality. moreover, invented outside the Russian Empire, and therefore - a simulacrum \ phantom \ joke of the Austrian General Staff.
      In addition, the national battalions are just armed gangs of robbers and marauders, therefore, terrorists. So the state you named is terrorist ... like ISIS, it is also a simulacrum / invention of the American, British and Israeli special services.
      So it was not in vain that Luka made a statement - the terrorists must be destroyed, and the captured Russian Land and Russian people must be released.
      It would also be good for Mexico to return the southern states of the USA ... better voluntarily. bully
      1. Shiden
        Shiden 17 January 2022 21: 02
        -2
        Boyard, you at least periodically look into history. Among the founding countries of the UN were the USSR, the Ukrainian SSR, the BSSR, but there was no RSFSR.
        1. bayard
          bayard 18 January 2022 09: 13
          +2
          Quote: Shiden
          you at least periodically look into history

          How-how-how. Stalin insisted on having not one, but at least three votes in the new organization. But they were not any states, they were the UNION REPUBLICS of the Soviet Union. And therefore, these members did not submit data on their borders and its demarcation with neighboring states to the UN.
          Even after secession.
          And for your information, at the time of registration as a member of the UN, the Ukrainian SSR of Crimea did not have any part of it, even as part of administrative borders. And Stalin slaughtered Galicia and Volyn for them from the Austrian inheritance of Poland. They were not part of the Republic of Ingushetia and the USSR until 1939. But it was from there that the infection of Ukrainianism spread.
          Materials on the demarcation of the borders of the so-called. Ukraine in the UN for all the years of independence has not filed. And so, it has NO borders recognized by the UN and neighboring states. At least they are officially unknown.
          While the Russian Federation, being the legal successor of the USSR, and the USSR, respectively, the successor of the Republic of Ingushetia, has all legal rights to its historical lands.
          And yes, one of the first members of the UN was the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, and not at all some legally unknown "Ukraine".
          And in the UN, the Russian Federation takes the place of the USSR by right of succession, and therefore has full rights to the territory of the Ukrainian SSR, which is part of it, but it has absolutely no idea WHERE the mythical "Ukraine" is located. There was no such "state" on the territory of the USSR.
          And yet - show me at least some document about the "dissolution" or "abolition" of the Soviet Union.
          Legally, it exists to this day.
          And consequently, all by-laws of the self-proclaimed "states" on the territory of the USSR (union republics) are, from a legal point of view, null and void.
          1. Shiden
            Shiden 18 January 2022 11: 31
            -6
            You write complete nonsense and you know why if, according to your logic, Ukraine is not the successor of the Ukrainian SSR, then Russia is not the successor of the USSR. And it would be the Russian Federation should return Kaliningrad, the Kuriles and South Sakhalin, the Karelian Isthmus with Petsamo. Because in your opinion it turns out that all the union republics did not have state paraphernalia in the form of borders, laws, authorities. The USSR constitution had a clause on secession from the USSR or you didn’t know that. And by the way, the transfer of Crimea was carried out according to the law of the USSR and not like the transfer of Taganrog from the Ukrainian SSR to the RSFSR.
            1. abrakadabre
              abrakadabre 18 January 2022 20: 34
              +1
              You write complete nonsense and you know why if, according to your logic, Ukraine is not the successor of the Ukrainian SSR, then Russia is not the successor of the USSR.
              Not at all. Russia officially declared itself the legal successor of the USSR. But Ukraine squeals from every iron that it denies its Soviet past. Although she simply does not have another.
            2. bayard
              bayard 18 January 2022 21: 27
              0
              Quote: Shiden
              if, according to your logic, Ukraine is not the successor of the Ukrainian SSR, then Russia is not the successor of the USSR.

              smile Ukraine never had its own statehood until 1992, did not go through the procedure for secession from the USSR and did not demarcate its "borders". The borders between the republics of the USSR were not state, but administrative, and there is no document itself on the "dissolution / abolition" of the USSR. It was a crime of the Belovezhskaya Pushcha conspirators and a deception of the citizens of the USSR - no document about the act committed then has been preserved. Neither in the Russian Federation, nor in the Ukrainian SSR, nor in Belarus such a document has been preserved. And there is no document - there is no legality.
              But the Russian Federation is officially the successor to the USSR. Including the UN.
              And the USSR included all its republics, and the borders of the USSR were demarcated and there are documents about this in the UN. In essence, all the "states" on the territory of the union republics are self-proclaimed, because they did not submit applications for secession from the USSR, procedures for secession, coordination of borders, they did not even receive their part from the external debts of the USSR - the Russian Federation paid off all debts.
              So do not equal statuses - legally you do not have it at all. So someone can consider himself an "emperor", an elf, the heir to the Sumerian kingdom, or the "state of Ukraine". And yes - look at WHAT borders of the Ukrainian SSR became part of the USSR !! There is no Crimea, Donbass, Galicia, Chernivtsi region.
              At the same time, the Donetsk-Krivoy Rog Republic also existed - as part of the RSFSR.
              Isn't it bold with such gifts from the USSR to swagger with independence?
              Since we went for a divorce, it means the division of property, the return of all gifts, the payment for everything built at the expense of the union budget.
              Remember in what ruins the Ukrainian SSR lay after the Second World War.
              Who financed all of this?
              All these issues have not been resolved. And this means that the USSR or its successor, the Russian Federation, have full rights to the Ukrainian SSR, and "Ukraine" ... is a phantom, an invention, an obsession. Without any legal right to exist.
              request Alas for you.
      2. Refael
        Refael 18 January 2022 20: 25
        0
        Why is it there, the whole planet is Russian land, take it wassat
    4. Refael
      Refael 18 January 2022 22: 13
      0
      It's different, you don't understand)
  9. your vsr 66-67
    your vsr 66-67 17 January 2022 14: 19
    0
    It's time to bring the CSTO forces into Belarus, and on a permanent basis!
    1. Denis812
      Denis812 17 January 2022 14: 40
      +6
      The CSTO forces have already been in Belarus on a permanent basis for 20 years.
      Just because Belarus is in the CSTO.
    2. bayard
      bayard 17 January 2022 15: 53
      +1
      Quote: your vsr 66-67
      It's time to bring the CSTO forces into Belarus, and on a permanent basis!

      Can't Belarus itself and the Union State cope? The CSTO intervenes with rapid reaction forces when there is a request from a member country.
      I think that Luka meant that the issue of bringing CSTO forces into Ukraine should be considered - after the coup, gangs of robbers and marauders are rampaging in the country to this day. That is TERRORISTS. This is a threat to all neighbors and not only - these bandits and Syria fought as part of ISIS and Al-Qaeda. And they took the most direct part in the Kazakhstani events. And in Belarus. And in Russia, these bandits are constantly caught. This nest of terrorism must be neutralized
      Joint forces.
  10. Zoomlion
    Zoomlion 17 January 2022 15: 33
    0
    Laughter with laughter, if it weren’t so serious. Kazakhstan is a great example. They will try to shake Belarus again, but more seriously. Help us Almighty
    1. Naive
      Naive 18 January 2022 00: 10
      -2
      It won't help... Not this time...
  11. ugol2
    ugol2 17 January 2022 16: 31
    +8
    Belarusian President believes that Ukrainian nationalist fighters are much more dangerous than military personnel from NATO countries

    Thinks correctly. He remembers about Khatyn.
  12. mongolian9999
    mongolian9999 17 January 2022 16: 58
    0
    Great move. Old Man has nothing to lose in world politics. An occasion from Ukraine, and the Belarusian (well, almost) army will warm it up. They don’t turn on the father, there the elder brother is sitting in ambush. Good brother, he does not attack. The doctrine is this. But it will protect. Russia seems to be out of business, and the problem of NATO at the borders will be solved by proxy. The time has come for the father to pay for support in an attempt to overthrow.