The problem of disposing of atomic submarines

16
The problem of disposing of atomic submarines


Five countries are armed with nuclear submarines (APL). It is believed that the life of the submarine is about 25 years. In Soviet times, the naval forces received 250 submarines. After the collapse of the Soviet bloc, most of them were withdrawn from the Navy. Before the Russian military was the task of their disposal.

To understand the level of this problem, you should list the stages of decommissioning submarines:
- it is necessary to drain the coolant and unload nuclear fuel from the reactor;
- cut, in the conditions of a stationary dock, the reactor compartment (the shelf life of the dismantled reactor unit is from 70 to 100 years);
- dismantle the equipment of the submarine;
- make sealing compartments and cover with anti-corrosion material;
- tow the dismantled parts and equipment to the place of long-term storage.

This process is not only costly, but time consuming. For example, in the USA, nuclear fuel has been outloaded for about a year. In Russia, the existing nuclear fuel storage facilities are overcrowded and a large number of nuclear submarines have been waiting for their disposal for many years. Most of the submarines are disposed of in the Russian Federation at the Nerpa, Zvezda and Zvezdochka factories and Mayak. Submarines are delivered to the shipyards of these plants either by towing or on a floating dock.

For comparison: the cost of disposing of one submarine in Russia is (depending on its type) from $ 2 million to $ 12 million, and in the USA it is equal to $ 50 million.

The capacities of the Russian plants are not enough for the regeneration of nuclear fuel, and special transport containers and freight containers TK-VG-18 are also not enough. The Russian side has yet another difficult problem - the release of storage facilities (coastal and floating) is extremely slow, which significantly slows down the process of unloading nuclear fuel, and, consequently, the dismantling of nuclear submarines. Currently, more than 200 Russian nuclear submarines, most of which were built during the Soviet era, are awaiting recycling.

In order to solve the disposal problem, the state corporation Rosatom plans to export radioactive waste from the territory of Kamchatka during 2014-2015. Waste will be deactivated and finally buried. It should be noted that in the area of ​​the city of Vilyuchinsk since the 60-ies is one of the largest naval bases, passing in the documents of NATO, codenamed "Wasp Nest". Not far from this base there is an equipped storage facility in which nuclear waste from submarines is stored, including parts of submarines, personal protective equipment and other materials subjected to radioactive contamination. The radiation situation in the area is constantly monitored. The monitoring results indicate that the danger of the spread of radioactive waste was not detected. However, it was decided to build over the existing storage of the building, in which, in accordance with the technology, radioactive waste will be packed in special containers and exported from the territory of Kamchatka. This process will last as long as this Far Eastern submarine base exists on the peninsula.

The planned Rosatom program to free Kamchatka from nuclear waste is only part of a large comprehensive program for the disposal of Russian nuclear submarines that have served their life. Before 70-s, the submarine was buried by flooding them in the ocean. But after signing an agreement to ban the deployment of radioactive objects in the seas, oceans and subsoil, Russian scientists and engineers were faced with the problem of finding ways to dismantle nuclear submarines. Technically, this process is very complicated. But, at present, it was possible to accelerate the course of disposal thanks to the large financial assistance from abroad.

For example, Japan financed $ 25 million in construction of a floating installation in Primor for cleaning nuclear waste from nuclear submarines undergoing disposal, and also paid for the dismantling of five Victor-3 submarines. Japan handed over to the Russian side the equipment (a sea tugboat, two gantry cranes and a floating dock) necessary to create a long-term storage facility for nuclear submarines to be disposed of in the Rogue Bay.

A long-term storage facility for nuclear waste with nuclear submarines has also been established on the Kola Peninsula. The cost of this project was more than $ 400 million. Now there are 54 power units with submarines in storage. It would be very difficult for Russia alone to cope with the dismantling of old types of submarines, which is why European countries and the United States took part in this project. The European Bank financed the creation of conditions for the storage of drained fuel from the submarine class "Alpha". France paid for the transportation of this fuel. The development of a special container was paid for by the American side. The Italians financed the construction of the vessel, which will carry out the export of fuel.

Rosatom's specialists believe that joint efforts will establish a system for the dismantling of nuclear submarines. In the future, it is planned to clear the bottom of the Arctic Ocean from previously submerged submarine compartments and containers with radioactive substances.

Materials used:
http://expert.ru/2012/09/6/generalnaya-uborka/?n=66995
http://www.atominfo.ru/newsb/k0923.htm
http://www.militaryparitet.com/ttp/data/ic_ttp/1384/
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    21 September 2012 08: 13
    It would be very difficult for Russia alone to cope with the dismantlement of old types of nuclear submarines, which is why the countries of Europe and the USA took part in this project.

    I am delighted with the nobility of Western countries! In the end, how can you stay on the sidelines when your main geographic rival disarms himself, and not help him with money! Also "Thank you!" will say!
    1. 0
      21 September 2012 09: 28
      Exactly, especially these:
      SSBN project 941 "Shark"
    2. 0
      5 October 2012 23: 47
      It would be very difficult for Russia alone to cope with the dismantlement of old types of nuclear submarines, which is why the countries of Europe and the USA took part in this project.

      Damn, this was still not enough for us. Let them dispose of their own, but it’s good for us.

      Actually, I don’t like it at all, why dispose of it? It is necessary to update and again in operation! Well, there to replace the reactor, well, rockets, and the rest is something! The cases are of high quality, there are even titanium ones - they are generally eternal ...
  2. +1
    21 September 2012 11: 27
    yes ... oh spasbo western "friends" a deep bow to them .... maybe, as a gesture of goodwill, nuclear missiles from submarines to give them ... you see, we will appease, hypocrisy in general
    1. 0
      21 September 2012 17: 16
      "... maybe, as a gesture of goodwill, nuclear missiles from submarines can be presented to them ..." In fact, Alexander, sometimes I would very much like to "give" all this to them, with home delivery ... also "poplars "plant avenues ...
  3. +9
    21 September 2012 12: 35
    Of course, malice is malice, but is it better to sit yourself surrounded by a bunch of radioactive waste?
    And so they fucked up everything they could, so at least for some time their loot was good.
  4. +1
    21 September 2012 12: 43
    It’s even a pity this mighty ship! At one time he made a rustle at the adversary! I'd like to hope that the Russian nuclear submarine fleet does not end there!
  5. 0
    21 September 2012 14: 55
    What kind of fuel was "leaked" from Alf? the coolant, you probably mean?
  6. 116rus
    0
    21 September 2012 15: 40
    Guys, don’t get excited. We are talking not only about the disposal of recently decommissioned nuclear submarines, but also the submarines sunk in the ocean, even with the scoop
  7. vladimir64ss
    0
    21 September 2012 15: 51
    And if you add creativity? For example, in Tartus, organize a museum of the Navy in a submarine. Let the eye be happy.
  8. 0
    21 September 2012 16: 08
    Of course, it is necessary to dispose of it wisely ... while taking care of the environment ... it’s only a pity that together with the really outdated ones, some of the best submarines in their class are destroyed, and the same amers modernize and modernize, and if they dispose of it, they’re not like that at the same time, at the same time, without forgetting, it puts something in place ... and we’ll have everything that we’ll destroy and will not replace with anything new .. that’s already bad ... our amers and the Japanese are proud of giving us money !!!. .. it is in their interests ... the less boats we have the better for them ... they will give, for example, 10 million for recycling, but you will not have to spend 100 on the development or construction of additional countermeasures ... and it’s easier to live knowing that for example, your neighbor doesn’t have 50 boats, but only 5 (figuratively speaking) ... all this is sad.
  9. Gad
    +3
    21 September 2012 19: 22
    I’ll clarify the process a bit. More than one reactor compartment is being cut, since it does not have enough buoyancy and will drown. There are two options: the 1st to the compartment will attach specially made osteka floats and the 2nd, the easiest, this is when they leave one adjacent compartment from the bow and stern. At the same time, all of them are dismantled to zero, only a vertical ladder remains on the transverse bulkhead. Stability is considered and, if necessary, a solid ballast is laid in one of the compartments. Marks of recesses are applied on the outer casing for further control of the landing and the whole structure is thrown off to water. The weight of the 3 shut-off unit is about 1800 tons, the draft is 8,0 m (data for project 667B). In the 90s, these blocks were stored on water, now it seems that they have built a special concrete platform on which the reactor compartments should be installed, while the float compartments must be cut off and disposed of in metal.
  10. 0
    21 September 2012 21: 09
    I do not know about you, gentlemen, but it hurts me to look at it.
    1. 0
      22 September 2012 00: 05
      Quote: Comrade1945
      it hurts to look at it.

      I agree! In the Gulf of Finland, PSKRs of the 60s were cutting - the heart poured out blood, but here! In the place of this captain I would have shot myself. Disassemble your ship!
  11. +1
    21 September 2012 21: 19
    We accept handouts from other countries for recycling, and we donate billions to Korea. Wonderland.
    1. 0
      22 September 2012 07: 06
      the fact is that this is not a handout, but an investment. At the beginning of the article it is said how much recycling we have and how much they have, the difference is huge. So that we will recycle our boats.
  12. Karish
    +1
    22 September 2012 08: 51
    It would be very difficult for Russia alone to cope with the dismantlement of old types of nuclear submarines, which is why the countries of Europe and the USA took part in this project. The European Bank has funded the creation of conditions for the storage of drained fuel from an Alpha class submarine. France paid for the transportation of this fuel. The development of a special container was paid by the American side. The Italians funded the construction of the ship, which will carry out the export of fuel.

    It’s not a shame for a great country to run around the world with outstretched hands. Is there more money in Italy than in Russia?
  13. Karish
    0
    22 September 2012 09: 23
    Strange, we can cut it. and it does not matter for whose grandmothers, but to build?
    Against the background of diametrically opposite assessments of the Russian military reform (the authorities are happy, the ex-military leaders and experts speak of "shame and failure") on Friday, explanations were given on some "problematic weapons." Thus, the head of the Ministry of Defense Anatoly Serdyukov said that so far he cannot receive from the shipbuilders the nuclear-powered submarine of the project 955 Borey - Yuri Dolgoruky, the date of its transfer to the military department has been repeatedly postponed.
  14. 0
    23 September 2012 19: 46
    But then the prokhorov in the United States built a basketball stadium for 1 a billion, but here they throw everything for crumbs
    1. upasika1918
      0
      23 September 2012 20: 00
      He said that this helps to improve Russia's image in Sashka. Cleverly turned, scoundrel.