Loitering Ammunition Development Trends

61

An Israeli Harop UAV takes off from an offshore platform. IAI Graphics

In recent years, there has been increased attention to the direction of the so-called. loitering ammunition. A large number of new samples of this class are being developed, they enter the market and fight for contracts. Some of these samples have already managed to take part in real conflicts. In general, we are already talking about the formation of a full-fledged industry with its own characteristics, rules and trends.

Way to success


The first loitering ammunition was created in Israel in the second half of the eighties. In the future, other countries tried to develop this concept, which led to the emergence of several new projects. However, for a long time the concept drone-kamikaze did not receive much support and practically did not develop.



The situation has begun to change only in recent years. Ammunition of several types have found application in local conflicts and have shown a fairly high efficiency. Similar successes of existing products naturally attracted attention. Gradually, this led to the launch of a host of new projects, and some of these UAVs were later put into service.

At the moment, loitering ammunition is officially in service with almost a dozen countries of the world. There are dozens of products with different characteristics and capabilities developed by different countries on the arms market. At the same time, new projects are announced with enviable regularity and new projects appear. news on the signing of supply contracts.


Upgraded device Harpy NG. IAI Graphics

In addition, the delivered products are used for real purposes during local conflicts. This again draws attention to the topic and advertises both specific samples and the entire direction. Also, the reputation of the concept is positively affected by interest from developed countries with powerful armies.

As a result, the industry is constantly growing in quantity and quality. Now the size and volume of the industry and the market already allow not only to consider individual samples or families. It becomes possible to search and study general development trends.

Reasons for interest


The reasons for the interest in loitering ammunition are quite simple. They combine the strengths of several classes of equipment and weapons at once. This allows you to get high combat qualities in general and provide advantages over other models. However, the combination of different features and functions can impose limitations, but the competent use of UAVs can minimize their impact.


Products of the UVision Hero family. Photo by Wikimedia Commons

A characteristic feature of loitering ammunition is its lower cost in comparison with other means of destruction. They are much cheaper than land-based and air-based guided weapons with comparable accuracy. The cost of an UAV and a guided artillery shell is comparable, but the use of the latter requires additional reconnaissance equipment. The kamikaze drone itself solves such problems.

The use of loitering ammunition dramatically speeds up and simplifies the search for and defeat of targets. Such a product should conduct patrols in a given area and has the ability to immediately hit the found object. Accordingly, no time is wasted transferring data to other weapons and organizing a strike.

However, most of these UAVs have characteristic shortcomings. This is a limited flight range, inferior to other strike weapons, a small warhead mass, etc. Due to this, loitering ammunition cannot fully replace the entire range of weapons, although it takes its place above the battlefield.

Development trends


Ammunitions of various sizes and weights with the corresponding power are currently on the market. Products have been created and are being offered from ultralight quadrocopters with a low-powered warhead to large UAVs carrying tens of kilograms of explosives. In most cases, such devices are carried out according to an aircraft scheme or resemble a cruise missile. Helicopter-type equipment, with all its advantages, has a limited distribution.


Russian apparatus from the Lancet line. Zala Aero Photos

It is curious that the heavy category is not of particular interest and is represented by only a few samples. First of all, these are Harpy and Harop products from the Israeli company IAI. With a wingspan of more than 2 m and a mass of at least 120-130 kg, they carry warheads up to 32 kg. This technique has shown its capabilities in real conflicts, but the complexity of operation has also manifested itself.

Probably, the lack of noticeable progress in the heavy class is connected with the latter. The bulk of modern ammunition are light and medium. They have the optimal combination of technical, combat and operational parameters.

Combat use, testing and market research have shown that UAVs weighing up to 12-15 kg with a payload of no more than 3-5 kg ​​are of the greatest interest to customers. In addition, it makes sense to create unified families that include several products with different characteristics. Israeli devices of the UVision Hero family or the Russian Zala "Lancet" can be considered as an example of such trends.

Loitering ammunition does not need outstanding flight performance. In most cases, the maximum flight speed does not exceed 100-120 km / h. At the same time, emphasis is placed on the duration of the flight, which is usually 30-40 minutes. A favorable combination of flight characteristics and weight is achieved through the use of electric propulsion systems.


Light loitering ammunition "Kub-BLA" with satellite guidance. Zala Aero Photos

In theory, loitering ammunition can carry various types of reconnaissance and detection equipment. However, by now, an optical-electronic unit with a day and night channel has become the standard solution. Such equipment is characterized by compactness, lightness and relative simplicity, which reduces the requirements for the carrier. At the same time, the optics allow the operator to observe the terrain, find the target and point the UAV at it. Managing the apparatus by the operator greatly simplifies the complex as a whole.

However, there are other solutions as well. So, the Israeli product Harpy had an autopilot that flew according to a given program, and a passive radar seeker. The later Harop used optics and radar. Modern ammunition from the Russian company Zala Aero and some foreign developments, in addition to optics, use satellite navigation and can attack targets with known coordinates.

Various types of launchers are being developed as part of strike unmanned systems. Rail launchers or transport-launch containers are mainly used. In the case of light and medium complexes, such products are portable or transportable. The largest UAVs have to be used with self-propelled chassis of the appropriate carrying capacity, and whole batteries from TPK can be placed on one chassis. So, the Taiwanese complex "Jiang Xian" includes a semi-trailer with a launcher for 12 drones.

Separately, it is necessary to consider the "direction" of loitering munitions of handicraft production. In local conflicts, the simplest products made from commercial UAVs or components are used. Such drones are most often equipped with a warhead in the form of ready-made bulk ammunition of suitable size and weight. The reliability and efficiency of such UAVs are usually low, but the low cost and ease of manufacture fully compensate for all the shortcomings.


Taiwanese complex "Jian Xiang". in the background is a launcher. Photo Taiwan Public Television Service

Development continues


Thus, the development of loitering ammunition has already led to the formation of the optimal appearance of such a complex. It combines the most favorable performance characteristics and a fairly high commercial potential. However, some samples do not fit into these trends and still show noticeable results.

The "average" modern kamikaze drone is a compact product weighing no more than 15 kg with a high-explosive warhead of several kilograms, an electric motor and optoelectronic reconnaissance equipment. Such a UAV, launch and control facilities can be carried by crew or transported by any transport. This appearance of the complex has been repeatedly tested by tests and real operations.

Apparently, most of the new loitering ammunition projects will now be built according to this concept, with some changes or innovations. However, the search for alternative solutions will continue, incl. within other classes of technology. This will certainly lead to the appearance of original UAVs and their unusual carriers.

The future of loitering ammunition is obvious. This direction will be further developed, as a result of which new samples of various kinds will regularly appear. They should also be expected to be put into service, and the list of operators will also be constantly growing. It is not known when such growth processes will stop for objective reasons. But this should not be expected in the coming years.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

61 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    15 January 2022 05: 04
    Is it possible to counteract loitering ammunition by means of electronic warfare?
    1. -3
      15 January 2022 05: 28
      Not if he himself is looking for a goal
      1. +4
        15 January 2022 05: 38
        Not if he himself is looking for a goal

        Yourself?
        This is dangerous.
        Maybe a civilian for the goal to accept.
        Suddenly some kid with a stick will be the target.
        1. -7
          15 January 2022 05: 49
          Well, to be honest. That don't care. Such is the selyavi :(
          This is war, baby.
          1. +7
            15 January 2022 05: 51
            This is war, baby.

            Well, the Fritz in the Second World War thought so too ... it ended in Nuremberg for the German generals.
            It is unlikely that any of the real military now wants to be in their place for the extermination of civilians. hi
            1. -8
              15 January 2022 06: 11
              Lie. Nonsense. And a provocation.
              The Nazis drowned for genocide.
              In military operations, civilian casualties are inevitable. How to eliminate them is another matter.
              Well, this is not your peacekeeper, is it? Well, isn't it?
            2. +4
              15 January 2022 06: 22
              Depends on who is using it. Americans don't give a damn. And the world community, which is typical, is not very indignant.
            3. -2
              15 January 2022 22: 59
              Quote: Lech from Android.
              it ended with Nuremberg for the German generals.

              I don’t want to seem bloodthirsty, but tell me, how many generals after Nuremberg were brought to justice for proven crimes against civilians? .... request And in the war zone, even civilians must understand that one should not wander anywhere. It's better to leave this area altogether. Perfectly...
        2. +4
          15 January 2022 20: 28
          Quote: Lech from Android.
          Maybe a civilian for the goal to accept.

          Well, why not...Even in the ancient Hellfire, the target recognition function was incorporated. He could distinguish, for example, a tank from a truck and a passenger car. Accordingly, having received the task of destroying cars, the tank will not be touched.
          1. +2
            15 January 2022 23: 08
            Quote: shahor
            Even in the ancient Hellfire, the target recognition function was laid. He could distinguish, for example, a tank from a truck and a car

            In fact, to this day, if the media do not lie, then the Hellfire AGM-114R is used from the UAV at the command of the UAV operator after the execution of the "algorithm for checking the legality of the application." And the rocket flies where it is pointed, even if it is a bicycle next to the tank. So, perhaps something intelligent was put there, but nothing is heard about its use in practice.
            1. 0
              16 January 2022 19: 07
              Quote: Hagen
              Hellfire" is used from a UAV at the command of the UAV operator

              Hellfire was originally used from Apache, and then there was no talk of UAVs. And it was used, for example, in the column mode - missiles were launched, by default hitting the first and last vehicles in the column. Today, Hellfire is still part of the Apache armament, although it is slowly being replaced by a new missile ... And the UAV, well, why not hang something. The rocket is reliable, accurate, they were stamped to the very end. They hung 16 pieces on Mohawk. Half the tank battalion will burn.
        3. 0
          17 February 2022 18: 11
          Over time, it will be. And there will be mistakes.
      2. +1
        15 January 2022 08: 25
        Question??? How does he find his purpose? By smell or other systems?
        Anything can be hit with interference. If some kind of radar means, then not too fancy, it is clogged with interference at a time, if with TGS it will be aimed at any fire ... and so on. Well, intercepting the control channel is without options. The main thing is to find out. While these shells are of a tactical level and their radius of action is small. These are hard to deal with. Due to the short time spent in the air and their goals are appropriate. Front edge.
        1. -1
          15 January 2022 14: 46
          Using computer bookmarks, you can put images of armed people of equipment into the program and, at the moment something similar is found on the ground, contact the operator, and he will make a decision based on the video from the UAV or the UAV will make a decision - a Turkish kamikaze drone made such a decision last year and killed a person .
        2. +7
          15 January 2022 20: 13
          "Question ??? How is he looking for a goal?" ///
          ---
          According to the optical image embedded in the memory.
          He knows what they look like from above: a tank, an infantry fighting vehicle, an artillery gun.
          If he sees a similar object with his scanning video camera -
          attacks. If there is more than one, sort by importance.
          1. +1
            16 January 2022 07: 16
            Read one of the principles of operation of the Spike NLOS ATGM
        3. +2
          15 January 2022 20: 32
          Quote: YOUR
          Anything can be hit with interference. If some means of the radar, then not too fancy, clogged with interference at a time

          ======
          They did not pay attention to what was written in the article: the same Harpy and others can be equipped passive GOS radio frequency range (!!!). In such a situation, when jamming the communication channel with the operator or satellite, it can automatically redirect to the source of noise interference! request Of course, he won’t “get” stations of a large radius, but stations of smaller power operating in the front-line zone (which actually “jam” him - easily!
          Well, and besides: to use such toys in high-intensity conflicts, when the enemy’s front line is covered by a continuous radar field and is saturated with various air defense systems - their use is not very effective! Well, if this is not the case, then it will be extremely difficult to detect such an apparitik (especially at night): thanks to the electric motor, it is almost silent and has a very weak IR signature. Therefore, their attack can be quite unexpected.hi
          1. +2
            16 January 2022 07: 24
            Quote: venik
            Harpy and others can be equipped with passive seeker of the radio frequency range

            This is the anti-radar projectile. I don’t see any other purpose for him with a passive seeker.
            Quote: venik
            Of course, he will not "get" a station of a large radius

            It has a maximum flight range of 400 km. Get it.
            1. +1
              16 January 2022 12: 52
              Quote: YOUR
              This is the anti-radar projectile. I don’t see any other purpose for him with a passive seeker.

              =======
              Exactly! drinks But if, in addition to the passive seeker of the radio frequency range, an OELS of the optical and IR ranges is also mantulated there (and this is quite possible, since both of these systems can be very compact and have low power consumption), then it can work for other purposes (if the air is not interfered with hammered).....
              1. +2
                16 January 2022 13: 07
                There is no universal weapon.
                1. 0
                  16 January 2022 16: 09
                  Quote: YOUR
                  There is no universal weapon.

                  ======
                  At least: all universal always worse than SPECIALIZED!
                  A striking example is the Swiss-American ADATS system! This "anti-aircraft and anti-tank station wagon" with very modest performance characteristics (it turned out: neither God - a candle, nor the devil - a poker), even battered American warriors scared away with their "sky-high cost. And not only them! Greece also consistently abandoned this "universal" (she preferred the Russian "Tors") and Thailand and Turkey and other potential customers .... Only Canada bought as many as 33 pieces, and even then she doesn't know what to do with them ..... Is it a joke - such a machine:

                  costs almost $ 17 million (!), and if you want to link it into a network-centric system, then if you please, also fork out for a battery gearbox (also not cheap!) And a data exchange system .... Moreover, "anti-aircraft and anti-tank" missiles are expensive ... And this despite the fact that in bad weather (fog, precipitation) - she does not want to work at all (due to the lack of a guidance radar) !!!
                  Such a funny "universal" turned out .... lol
                  1. +1
                    16 January 2022 18: 33
                    for 17 lyam he must fly))) this is the price of a shock turntable
                    1. 0
                      16 January 2022 21: 22
                      Quote: Yarhann
                      for 17 lyam he must fly))) this is the price of a shock turntable

                      ======
                      So, note: this is in prices early 90s years of the last century!!!
                      1. +1
                        16 January 2022 22: 08
                        wow, this is even the MFI of those times, the same F16)). in short, they normally kicked the dough by buying a junk. someone in the Canadian Ministry of Defense rolled back well, probably bought an island in Hawaii)))
                      2. 0
                        16 January 2022 23: 01
                        Quote: Yarhann
                        someone in the Canadian Ministry of Defense rolled back well, probably bought an island in Hawaii)))

                        ======
                        The funny thing is that you are not far from the truth! good
                        True, the scandal was not connected with the system itself, but with the acquisition of land for the construction of an assembly plant in Canada (the allocated land plot was rapidly resold several times and as a result its value increased several times!) and the deal to build the plant fell through (which cost the Minister of Transport his positions).... good drinks
                      3. 0
                        16 January 2022 23: 19
                        resale of land for development by officials in the west is the norm.
                  2. +2
                    17 January 2022 06: 44
                    Even in the USSR they abandoned universal weapons. How did you write
                    Quote: venik
                    with very modest performance characteristics (it turned out: neither to God - a candle, nor to hell - a poker)

                    In those distant times, Tukhachevsky vigorously pushed the ideas of universality. Money spent on a lot of zero exhaust.
                    1. +1
                      17 January 2022 12: 17
                      Quote: YOUR
                      In those distant times, Tukhachevsky vigorously pushed the ideas of universality. Money spent on a lot of zero exhaust.

                      ======
                      One example of this trend was an unsuccessful attempt to "cross" an anti-aircraft and anti-tank gun "in one bottle". The result was the F-22 - a gun with excellent ballistics, but terribly bulky, heavy, complex and expensive to manufacture and operate ..... And only during the war, at the insistence of Grabin and others, having removed the "anti-aircraft function" (which turned out to be completely unnecessary), they simplified the design of the machine and carriage and got ... the famous ZIS-3 - the best in its class!
                      PS No, some "universalization" (within reasonable limits, of course),
                      if it is carried out WITHOUT damage to the main purpose, it only benefits most weapon systems. For example, the expansion of the range of ammunition (OFS) allows the Kornet ATGM to hit not only armored targets, but also light field fortifications, accumulations of manpower and even low-speed low-flying targets ("turntables" and UAVs), but at the same time it remains FIRST of all an anti-tank complex !
                      1. +1
                        17 January 2022 12: 28
                        A masterpiece of Tukhachevsky's inflamed imagination, namely the project to create a universal anti-aircraft divisional gun. Grabin designed an excellent cannon, but by pressure from Tukhachevsky they forced Grabin to make the cannon field and at the same time anti-aircraft. Yes, two more gunners. One pointed in elevation, the second in azimuth .. Idiocy.
                      2. +1
                        17 January 2022 12: 55
                        I am not at all inclined to overestimate the "commander's genius" of Tukhachevsky, who was once so touted: cruelty and promiscuity in means ..... That picture is not very good .....
                      3. +2
                        17 January 2022 13: 09
                        I read in my opinion here on VO an article about Tukhachevsky. Not verbatim, but the essence is something like this - if with the funds that he squandered they built a wall against which they leaned him, it should be at least platinum.
        4. -1
          16 January 2022 12: 49
          well, the algorithm is this - the area of ​​\uXNUMXb\uXNUMXbthe alleged location of the target is determined, the launch of the drone there, after reaching the given square, the search begins in a spiral, after detection, identification is carried out by the operator or in accordance with the base on the UAV itself, but the point is that such systems will apply to heavy kamikaze drones, all light or medium ones are tritely guided by navigation or taking into account feedback
          1. -1
            16 January 2022 13: 14
            Spiral around what?
            All of these loitering shells are not used in free hunting mode. The most common use case, it is known that the target is in the designated area, and the projectile is sent there. When a target is detected - an attack.
            So ours in Syria destroyed several leaders of the militants. And the Americans operate on the same principle. The Jews improved the memory of the projectile laying the silhouettes of enemy equipment, so they destroyed the Syrian Shell. But such a projectile is expensive, they will be used only for important purposes.
            1. -1
              16 January 2022 16: 25
              from the center of the area where the target is supposed to be, so if I’m not mistaken, new US anti-ship missiles are operating .. About silhouettes, detection ... why are you twisting my words in your own way?)
              1. +1
                17 January 2022 06: 37
                Yes, I’m not twisting your words, but I cite as an example the principles of operation of the Israeli Spike NLOS ATGM.
                1. 0
                  17 January 2022 10: 24
                  it's not about current cars but about their development
    2. +2
      15 January 2022 08: 14
      you can, they are remote-controlled in most cases
    3. +2
      15 January 2022 08: 19
      Certainly. It is no different from any other type of weapon.
      Put interference on the control channel, clog the search engines of the projectile itself with interference.
      1. +1
        16 January 2022 05: 32
        Controversial.
        Modern missiles with ARL seeker have the function of targeting interference.
        What prevents the "barrageur" ​​with the radar seeker from doing this?
        If the search is optical, then it will not react at all to various radar interference stations.
        1. +3
          16 January 2022 07: 15
          Nothing interferes. It interferes with the cost and purpose.
          The Jews made the Spike NLOS loitering ATGM, with a range of up to 50 km. Moreover, they began to use the principle of "shot and forget", as well as more complex "shot-sent" and "shot-evaluated-corrected".
          They began to use homing on known silhouettes. The silhouettes of cars are stored in memory, for example, the T-72. They are searched with the help of a video system and further attack. Thus the Shell was destroyed.
          Whatever you say, a formidable weapon.
    4. +3
      15 January 2022 18: 32
      The rise of AI is making them increasingly autonomous
    5. 0
      15 January 2022 21: 48
      Satellite communication is very difficult to jam if the UAV antenna is directed upwards.
      1. +1
        15 January 2022 23: 17
        loitering have no connection with the satellite
        1. +3
          16 January 2022 07: 27
          Why don't they?
          At the initial stage, the exit to the target area is guided by the satellite.
          1. 0
            17 January 2022 02: 30
            here some clarification should be applied: do we receive or send? and if we send, then the coordinates or the video stream?
            yes, cruise missiles can also be considered loitering bp, but it is quite obvious that this is far-fetched. In fact, impact UAVs have no place for the footage return feature. In addition, there is a risk of leaving such equipment in the disputed territory. Well, where the enemy has access to the hardware, there is data protection in full.
            1. +1
              17 January 2022 06: 27
              Understand what you are writing about.
    6. +1
      16 January 2022 12: 46
      quite, for this, ships must be equipped with active countermeasures - laser suppression and microwaves, in fact there are already self-defense tools for helicopters, such as President-S or the Rat-S drone combat complex, which is equipped with a laser and a microwave emitter, taking into account ship-based, more powerful systems can be used to disable the UAV seeker

      1. +1
        16 January 2022 13: 32
        anti-drone complex Rat-S, which is equipped with a laser and a microwave emitter

        You are talking about powerful means of directed energy. But where are they outside of exhibitions?
        There was recently an article about these developments in the USA
        https://topwar.ru/190998-mikrovolnovym-oruzhiem-dlja-vms-ssha.html
        1. +1
          16 January 2022 16: 27
          questions to the Ministry of Defense - they are very conservative in their approaches .. the problem of rigidity of thinking within the framework of the charter, the same Ministry of Defense until 2008 refused to purchase UAVs under the pretext "we have a lot of pilots", the GRU refused to form a COO under the pretext "we will still command soldiers" ..with this in mind, you need a kick
        2. +2
          17 January 2022 06: 34
          I'm not sure that there are valid samples at the exhibitions.
  2. +7
    15 January 2022 05: 19
    Most importantly, you can't argue with the conclusion:
    The future of loitering ammunition is obvious. This direction will be further developed, as a result of which new samples of various kinds will regularly appear.

    Dagger Loitering ammunition is good for someone who has it, and bad for someone who does not have it at the right time.
  3. -2
    15 January 2022 05: 28
    “Probably, the lack of noticeable progress in the heavy class is connected with the latter. The bulk of modern ammunition is light and medium. It is they who have the optimal combination of technical, combat and operational parameters.
    "

    Price. Everything is decided by the price.
    And the reconnaissance UAV complex, electronic warfare, suppressed air defense are inevitable, and only then loitering ammunition is used confidently for a known target. And these developments were known to me personally from the ZVO magazine in the mid-80s, and not the Jews, but the United States, were seriously engaged in them.
    Then there was no such term, there was an idea to create a lionfish that distinguishes a tank from a tractor. I let her into the area, she herself will find the target.
  4. -3
    15 January 2022 05: 53
    We recognize Kirill Ryabov by his gait! He's wearing Findelpers' pants!
    I miss Damantsev there, at least you could neigh.
  5. +2
    15 January 2022 07: 06
    Loitering ammunition today has a variety of applications.
    For example, a disposable Coyote drone can intercept strike UAVs.
    https://naukatehnika.com/coyote-unichtozhaet-dronyi.-video-ot-raytheon.html
    In defense against amphibious landings and vice versa, fire support during amphibious landings.
    Fighting enemy radar. Fight with snipers.
  6. +1
    15 January 2022 10: 22
    Loitering ammunition is an excellent weapon in a situation where you know that the target is somewhere there, but exactly where, no. Or do not know when it will appear there.
    A sort of minefield, only flying.
    On the other hand, the development of detection and communication technologies turns even classic cruise missiles into loitering ammunition, such as the latest modification of the Tomogawk. Over time, all sorts of conditional Excaliburs and Javalins will also grow up to this.
  7. +1
    15 January 2022 12: 36
    The increasing spread of blocking UAVs requires countermeasures, and there are three obvious ways: the development of electronic warfare equipment that allows jamming satellite navigation and UAV control signals, and not only in the form of trucks with radio equipment that unmask themselves and can be attacked, but, I think, and light automatic systems of small dimensions, the mass installation of which on the ground could be carried out directly by combat and auxiliary units (for example, in the form of a knapsack device weighing 15-25 kg, powered by a car battery or a compact gas generator and with an engine from the same UAV, autonomy in a pair days, when equipped with such, let's say each motorized rifle platoon in the amount of 2-4 units), the second direction is the development of passive radio reconnaissance equipment, fire control systems for RV&A, and their integration, with the aim of promptly identifying and destroying UAV control equipment (as well as military equipment communications, radar, etc.) within reach cannon artillery, MLRS, and OTRK, depending on the range and value of the target. And thirdly, this is the equipping of army air defense systems with passive radio reconnaissance equipment for detecting signal-transmitting UAVs, as well as the development of anti-aircraft ammunition for them optimized for hitting low-speed, small-sized targets at ultra-small ranges and altitudes to hit loitering, and at 15-20 km, for attack UAVs.
    1. 0
      15 January 2022 14: 48
      Lasers, mini missiles and anti-aircraft guns with radar systems and optical channels - all means will be good against UAVs.
  8. 0
    15 January 2022 19: 10
    Loitering ammunition only makes it easier to crack the defense, only the one who can develop success from their use will win. It worked out in Karabakh, not in Syria and Libya.
  9. 0
    16 January 2022 14: 43
    Quote: YOUR
    It is carried out with the help of a video system to search for them and further attack. Thus the Shell was destroyed.

    "Pantsir S1E" was destroyed by the KAB with fired ammunition and without a crew in the cockpit!
    If the lazy Arabs had at least covered the air defense system with a masknet, or taken it from the open area to the caponier, or at least not abandoned it without a tracking operator, then the defeat would not have happened!
    In this case, Pantsir = Kamaz laughing
  10. 0
    16 January 2022 15: 41
    If you make them cheaper and increase the speed and damaging factor, then they can become a headache, because. can be used instead of artillery / rocket systems. Fuck you will determine the location of such catapults with the help of acoustic locators.
  11. -1
    17 March 2022 14: 55
    Now the article is more relevant than ever, point Because for some reason, Russian loitering ammunition is not visible

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"