Top news from the world of military aviation in 2021

50

Photo by: kremlin.ru

2021 turned out to be extremely remarkable for various events, one way or another connected with the military aviation different countries. This applies, first of all, to fighters and attack UAVs.

If we talk about countries, then Russia and China were the most marked in the past year.



Tests of the main American novelty - the B-21 strategic bomber - were postponed (in 2019 it was reported that it could make its maiden flight in December of this year).

The first flight of the Russian Tu-160 bomber, assembled from scratch, was also shifted to the right. Now it should be expected no earlier than the beginning of next year.

F-15EX (USA)


On February XNUMX, a fighter flew into the sky for the first time F-15EX Is the most advanced aircraft in the F-15 family. In particular, he received a Raytheon AN / APG-82 radar with an active phased antenna array (AFAR), a "glass" cockpit, a system for displaying important information on a helmet-mounted display and a new mission control computer.


Photo: Boeing

The main feature of the F-15EX lies in the armament: the aircraft is positioned as "the most heavily armed fighter".

I must say, these are not empty words.

The vehicle can carry up to 22 air-to-air missiles, as well as a variety of air-to-surface ammunition, including hypersonic weapon up to 22 feet long and weighing up to 7 pounds. "

In total, the US military expects to purchase up to 200 F-15EX fighters.

KF-21 Boramae (South Korea)


The presentation of the KF-21 fighter was held in April at the headquarters of the South Korean aircraft corporation Korean Aerospace Industries (KAI).

While the KF-21 has all the hallmarks of stealth technology, it is neither invisible nor fifth generation.

Boramae carries weapons on external holders, which means it cannot in any way meet the requirements of stealth technology.

Because of this, the fighter is often referred to as generation 4,5 or 4 plus.


In the configuration shown, the aircraft is 16,9 meters long and has a wingspan of 11,2 meters.

It has an AFAR radar and ten points of suspension: six under the wing and four under the fuselage. The power plant is based on two General Electric F414-GE-400K engines. The crew is one person.

In the future, they may create a two-seater version.

Su-75 Checkmate (Russia)


The main novelty for the Russian-speaking community is undoubtedly the new generation Su-75 fighter, which was officially shown at MAKS for the first time.

The presentation was slightly spoiled by the fact that the first photos leaked to the Web even before it began and gave a general idea of ​​the fighter.


The aircraft is made according to the normal aerodynamic configuration with a V-shaped tail. The fixed air intake is located under the fuselage and has an extended lower lip.

The Su-75 received one engine and has pronounced signs of stealth technology.

The armament is housed inside, the combat load is 7 kilograms. On internal holders, it can carry up to five air-to-air missiles, as well as air-to-surface weapons, including such ammunition as K400BE, KAB-029, K500BE (UPAB-08B-E), KAB-500, KAB -250LG-E, X-250, X-38MK59, X-2USHK (E), Thunder-E58 and Thunder-E1. The vehicle has no built-in armament.

Usually the plane is positioned as an export plane, however, as of now, there is no information about a single firm order from foreign clients.

Perhaps, in the future, the car will be adopted by Russia itself.

The first flight of the Su-75 is scheduled for 2023.

Double J-20 (China)


The outgoing year can be called Chinese without exaggeration.

What is even the first flight of the first in the world worth? stories a fifth-generation two-seat fighter.

The car, however, was not an absolute novelty.

Firstly, it was created on the basis of the J-20, which Beijing has already produced in the amount of more than 150 units.

Secondly, information about the development in the PRC of a two-seater "five" went on the Web long before the first photos of the fighter.


And yet this is a very significant event, which could have far-reaching consequences: both for China and for the entire world aviation.

The fact is that the plane is being considered in the context of a potentially revolutionary concept of unmanned wingmen. It is for UAV control that a co-pilot can come in handy.

In this regard, it is appropriate to recall that Russia also wants to get its own fifth-generation two-seat fighter. It will be built on the basis of the Su-57, and the S-70 Okhotnik is sometimes considered as an unmanned wingman.

Deck version FC-31 (China)


Like its "big brother" J-20, the Shenyang FC-31 fighter has long been no secret to anyone.

The car made its first flight on October 31, 2012. Since then, the Chinese have built only a few prototypes, leaving many to forget about the project.


At various times, they talked about its possible problems, as well as the fact that they want to supply the plane to foreign customers.

The real purpose of the fighter became known in October, when a photo of the first flight of its carrier-based version, which received the unofficial designation J-35, was posted on the Web.

Even a quick glance was enough to see the differences from the base version.

The aircraft received a fundamentally different flashlight, which made it look like the American F-35B short takeoff and vertical landing fighter. At the same time, one must assume that China does not set itself the task of creating a VTOL aircraft.

In favor of this, in particular, speaks the design of the chassis, which is very different from that of the F-35B and is more similar to the one that we see on the F-35C, designed for ejection launch.

The novelty has a pull rod for attachment to the catapult shuttle and a folding wing.

The rest of the J-35 is similar to its progenitor. The car has two engines, V-shaped tail and one pilot's seat. The weapon is placed inside to maintain stealth.

New version of "Hunter" (Russia)


At the end of the year, the most ambitious Russian project from the world of the UAV made itself talk about.

At the Novosibirsk Aviation Plant named after V.P. Chkalov, a new sample of the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) S-70 "Okhotnik" was rolled out.


Photo: rostec

“The main feature of the new Okhotnik is the flat engine nozzle. Due to this, the radar visibility of the machine is reduced. In addition, for drone a new ground control post is being created, designed to meet the requirements of the military. These solutions will significantly increase the capabilities of the machine,”

- Sergey Chemezov, General Director of the State Corporation Rostec, commented on the event.

Work on the "Hunter" program began in 2011. The first apparatus with a "conventional" round nozzle first took to the skies in 2019.

It is noteworthy that the characteristics of the "Hunter" (we are talking about both versions of the UAV) are still not known for certain.

According to observers, it can use a wide range of air-to-surface weapons: in support of these words, a bomb was first shown dropped by Hunter in December.


Still from the video "Russia-1"

The combat load is estimated at three tons (sometimes they even talk about eight), and the take-off weight of the UAV can be about 25 tons.

Possible missions include reconnaissance, strikes against ground targets, and even air combat.
50 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    31 December 2021 06: 30
    How does a flat nozzle reduce radar signature?
    1. +1
      31 December 2021 07: 33

      Pessimist22 (Igor)
      Today, 06: 30
      0
      How does a flat nozzle reduce radar signature?

      Perhaps you will learn something from these sources. Although there are many opponents and such theories.
      The military pilot noted the fact that the new "Hunter" nozzle will significantly reduce its vulnerability to thermal homing heads of enemy missiles. "The idea of ​​a flat nozzle is to reduce the glow in the infrared range of the exhaust jet of gases from the engine. The infrared glow of this jet makes it possible to aim at the drone by air defense systems with TGS [thermal homing heads]," Popov said.

      "The oncoming air flow, as it were, compresses and blurs the gases coming out of the nozzle. There is no large torch - this is the invisibility of the jet of exhaust gases from the engine. the surface is air, "he explained.

      As noted by the honored military pilot, this nozzle shape also reduces the aircraft's visibility in the optical range.

      Stealth for radars
      The Major General explained that thanks to the new nozzle, the shape of the UAV's fuselage also changed, which made it even less visible to radars.

      "A decrease in the aircraft's radar signature due to the installation of a flat nozzle also takes place. The surface reflecting radio beams is also reduced because there are no abrupt transitions in the aircraft structure. It is now almost flat," he said.

      According to Popov, now the drone's fuselage practically looks like one wing. "If you recall the first version of the Hunter, then the engine clearly stood out there, but now it does not. Now the transitions are smooth, and, as a result, the reflecting surface is reduced, and the dispersion of radar beams is increased," he said.
      1. -2
        31 December 2021 10: 22
        there is nothing invisible, all this is marketing, and show-off ... the physical body, apparently always. the birds are visible (and they do not have a "fire-breathing nozzle)
        1. +8
          31 December 2021 11: 12
          there is nothing invisible, all this is marketing, and show-off
          all sorts of journalists write about "invisibility" to catch up with the waves. The military (and just literate people) write and talk about "stealth"... And do not repeat outright nonsense!
          1. +5
            31 December 2021 15: 05
            Quote: Region-25.rus
            there is nothing invisible, all this is marketing, and show-off
            all sorts of journalists write about "invisibility" to catch up with the waves. The military (and just literate people) write and talk about "stealth"... And do not repeat outright nonsense!

            I agree ... we will! drinks
        2. +6
          31 December 2021 18: 31
          This is not marketing, this is an attempt to stretch the time during which money is allocated, in the end we will get something that we cannot produce and give a new contract for env, to simplify and reduce the cost, not one armature according to such a scheme. I doubt that missiles with IR gsn, which catch targets in the "face", somehow get confused by a blurry torch.
    2. 0
      1 January 2022 13: 22
      In no way, but the heat is somewhat reduced, since more heat goes to the sides, the perimeter of the rectangle is greater than the length of a circle of equal area.
      1. 0
        4 January 2022 00: 26
        - Reduces and radar - see F-22, rear view:

  2. +6
    31 December 2021 06: 34
    Whenever material comes out about innovations in military aviation, every time I want to know when, in what quantity and whose army they will "make you happy" in the future.
  3. 0
    31 December 2021 06: 58
    It seems like a hunter has a speed of up to 1000 km, how he will work with a fighter, if his speed is over 2000 km per hour, everyone with the coming !!!
    1. +9
      31 December 2021 07: 46
      Quote: Free Wind
      It seems like a hunter has a speed of up to 1000 km, how he will work with a fighter, if his speed is over 2000 km per hour, everyone with the coming !!!

      Holiday greetings. Do you think that the fighter has two speeds - 0 and 2000 km / h? laughing
      1. +4
        31 December 2021 11: 16
        Do you think that the fighter has two speeds - 0 and 2000 km / h?
        well, the ore has only two extreme positions what From that, apparently, such thoughts arise laughing
        1. +2
          31 December 2021 15: 12
          Quote: Region-25.rus
          Do you think that the fighter has two speeds - 0 and 2000 km / h?
          well, the ore has only two extreme positions what From that, apparently, such thoughts arise laughing

          it depends on which "box" is ... if the "mechanics" is one ... "automatic" is the other ... tongue
          1. +1
            31 December 2021 21: 25
            it depends on which "box" is ... if the "mechanics" is one ... "automatic" is the other.

            You are kidding, and the man asked the case. Why the hell did they squirm, squeezing everything out of the design of the Su-57? Then hobble the racehorse and tie it to the herd of donkeys?
            It can be seen that there was no original idea. We made an analogue of the F-22, because it was time. Really needed. Then they made the Hunter, because the Americans had one. What for ? And fig knows him, "the Americans have." The Americans threw out theirs. And we do not have so much "dough". So they figure out where to attach it.
            1. +3
              1 January 2022 21: 31
              Actually, the work of the Hunter together with the Su-57 is only one of the options and is not the key one.
              1. 0
                2 January 2022 18: 16
                Quote: El Chuvachino
                Actually, the work of the Hunter together with the Su-57 is only one of the options and is not the key one.

                I think so too. And even in this article, it is noted about the ground control post "Hunter".

                I also think that it would be interesting to consider the option of controlling the Hunter from a promising strategic bomber, which is also planned to be subsonic, and also according to the "flying wing" scheme.
      2. +4
        31 December 2021 23: 36
        Quote: Vladimir_2U
        Quote: Free Wind
        It seems like a hunter has a speed of up to 1000 km, how he will work with a fighter, if his speed is over 2000 km per hour, everyone with the coming !!!

        Holiday greetings. Do you think that the fighter has two speeds - 0 and 2000 km / h? laughing

        You forgot about the back !!
    2. +1
      1 January 2022 05: 07
      Quote: Free Wind
      It seems like a hunter has a speed of up to 1000 km, how he will work with a fighter, if his speed is over 2000 km per hour, everyone with the coming !!!

      You have a Mercedes, which has a speed of, let's say, 200. And your wife has an Oka with a speed of no more than 100. I think you probably won't be able to go to the dacha with her in two cars - the maximum speeds are different ...
      1. +2
        1 January 2022 11: 56
        Quote: Gritsa
        Quote: Free Wind
        It seems like a hunter has a speed of up to 1000 km, how he will work with a fighter, if his speed is over 2000 km per hour, everyone with the coming !!!

        You have a Mercedes, which has a speed of, let's say, 200. And your wife has an Oka with a speed of no more than 100. I think you probably won't be able to go to the dacha with her in two cars - the maximum speeds are different ...

        if you go according to the rules, they will come together. but the sky has its own "rules".
      2. 0
        2 January 2022 18: 06
        Quote: Gritsa
        Quote: Free Wind
        It seems like a hunter has a speed of up to 1000 km, how he will work with a fighter, if his speed is over 2000 km per hour, everyone with the coming !!!

        You have a Mercedes, which has a speed of, let's say, 200. And your wife has an Oka with a speed of no more than 100. I think you probably won't be able to go to the dacha with her in two cars - the maximum speeds are different ...

        The question is not about possibility, but about expediency.
        Why use an expensive aircraft with supersonic cruising speed to control a subsonic UAV?

        Why not use the version of a cheaper subsonic aircraft for control purposes (at least, for example, in the same Su-57 designed to control the "Okhotnik", as an option, replace the engine with a cheaper one, providing subsonic cruising speed and supersonic afterburner).
  4. +4
    31 December 2021 09: 03
    F15EX is good, with its ammunition load, it can probably fire bursts of its missiles.
    1. -3
      31 December 2021 09: 17
      And it glows like a Christmas tree on the radar screens. And a combat radius of 300 kilometers. And also restrictions on overloads.

      Look that there are Russian ones in Syria, that the American ones, where are the combat missions in Iraq. 2-4 rockets / bombs. And that's all, that's enough. Well, also light aircraft such as falcon and raphal carry tanks on an external sling.
      Now it is not 41 or 45 years old when you can fly along the roads for free hunting.
      Now each sortie is first reconnaissance, then the suppression of air defense, then jamming, then a strike in one run.
      The days when stormtroopers dug the front line with their noses are over.
      1. +3
        31 December 2021 15: 14
        Quote: demiurg
        The days when stormtroopers dug the front line with their noses are over.

        Judge by Syria? in vain ...
  5. +1
    31 December 2021 10: 38
    And the most beautiful and aesthetic are the Su-27 and F-15.
    1. 0
      31 December 2021 15: 14
      Quote: Vadim Artyomenko
      And the most beautiful and aesthetic are the Su-27 and F-15.

      different markers ...
  6. +11
    31 December 2021 12: 18
    The aircraft is made according to the normal aerodynamic configuration with a V-shaped tail. The fixed air intake is located under the fuselage and has an extended lower lip.
    The Su-75 received one engine and has pronounced signs of stealth technology.

    -When did the Su-75 fly into the air?
    -Well, I haven't risen yet ...
    -And why?
    - So this is just a plywood model, made in a single copy ...
    1. +2
      31 December 2021 15: 47
      You do not understand, this is "different".
      1. +3
        1 January 2022 11: 40
        Quote: . TARS.
        You do not understand, this is "different".

        Well, of course it's different. Here is the same promising MiG-37, many bought in the 90s ...
        True on a scale of 1:72, and from an Italian modeling firm ... But still ... laughing laughing good drinks
    2. -2
      1 January 2022 07: 54
      Plywood Brain?

      This is a real plane that will go for testing after the exhibition. And as always, it is first static, blowing, and then it will rise into the air.

      And this was confirmed by the head of the UAC

      “This is exactly the plane that will take off in 2023,” said Yuri Slyusar, General Director of the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC)
      “This is not a model or a demonstrator,” says the head of the UAC. - In less than a year, we will have completed static tests, and we will enter the first flight. Our task is to offer customers a production aircraft starting in 2026 ”.
      1. +4
        1 January 2022 11: 24
        Quote: Dreamshake
        This is a real plane that will go for testing after the exhibition.

        And if it's not a secret, then after what exhibition will he go to the test? As far as I remember, but in all normal countries the plane first made its first test flight, and only then, having looked at its capabilities, it was "dragged" to various exhibitions. The USSR was a normal country, As an example, on December 31, 1968, the first prototype of Tu -144 USSR- 68001, which was very different from the Tu-144S, practically two different aircraft. The same B-12, visited the exhibition in Le Bourget, but again this time as an aircraft that repeatedly flew into the sky. And this "miracle of aircraft construction" has not yet completed a single flight. but already at the second exhibition I visited ... The RSK firm offers modelers a stand model of a futuristic Russian fighter in a 1: 1 scale. The model can be purchased in a set by pre-order, the set is not completed with paints and glue.
        1. -1
          1 January 2022 13: 04
          Try to turn on the logical apparatus. If there was an exhibition in Dubai, then after which exhibition will it go for testing?

          Yes, and that you are attached to the 75th, here some believe in the reality of the existence of the NGAD demonstrator
          1. 0
            2 January 2022 03: 25
            Quote: Dreamshake
            Try to turn on the logical apparatus. If there was an exhibition in Dubai, then after which exhibition will it go for testing?

            So it is logical that after the exhibition in Dubai, he will appear on trials only when they begin? Well, it is logical that after the exhibition, and after what period of time in a year, two or 10 years after the exhibition, it is no longer important.
            Quote: Dreamshake
            some believe in the reality of the existence of the NGAD demonstrator
            Actually, in this article about NGAD, there is nothing at all. Only about the magnificent layout of the Su-75.
            “This is not a model or a demonstrator,” says the head of the UAC.
            In general, it is not clear what kind of toy. And in a single copy. Here we will see this "miracle" in the air and then it will be possible to assert something, but for now we see the layout ...
  7. +6
    31 December 2021 18: 27
    It is noteworthy that of all those mentioned, it is Russia that has the worst, only mock-ups, the Su-75 managed to get only a bespontov name and a cartoon with its participation in the form of a photo toad, nothing has been done, nothing is even halfway ready, the stealth is only in the name , Russia does not have a single stealth ready for the series, and the mouth under the belly of the Su-75 is somehow not stealth. For the same Chinese, at least aircraft are being built on the basis of those already in mass production, so there are serious suspicions that everything will be fine with them.
    Of all those mentioned, only the Americans did something real and full-fledged, as usual, tons of continuous experience and money make themselves felt, maybe not breakthroughs, but a stable and confident movement from decade to decade commands only respect, they can and do.
    We could do this, too, and even no worse, let's imagine that from next year the movement would begin towards the level of the Americans, and not in the opposite direction.
    1. -4
      31 December 2021 21: 06
      After the excellent interception of the F-35 by the Russian Su-30 SM, the phrase "American stele fighter" can be considered a dirty word.
    2. -6
      31 December 2021 22: 34
      Yes, yes, Americans, tons of continuous experience))) They did not forget to read the manual))) It's so funny to read)))
    3. +4
      1 January 2022 05: 13
      Quote: English tarantass
      We could do this, too, and even no worse, let's imagine that from next year the movement would begin towards the level of the Americans, and not in the opposite direction.

      I think that we will be able to overtake the Americans in aircraft construction only when we develop, and they degrade. No other way. But in this case, we will still lag behind the Chinese.
      1. -3
        1 January 2022 07: 49
        Think badly. 57th from Sukhoi is already a fundamentally new combat vehicle, we are waiting for the 75th
      2. +2
        1 January 2022 09: 12
        But even in this case, we will still lag behind the Chinese.

        I do not know. The same Chinese in the 50s jumped a hundred for sure, more abruptly than ours in 30, and by the 90s they began to catch up. But again, this is shock work, a planned economy and the absence of social parasites, well, at first, only the borrowing of experience and technology. Everything is real, you have to do it
  8. AML
    0
    1 January 2022 23: 30
    Quote: Vladimir_2U
    Quote: Free Wind
    It seems like a hunter has a speed of up to 1000 km, how he will work with a fighter, if his speed is over 2000 km per hour, everyone with the coming !!!

    Holiday greetings. Do you think that the fighter has two speeds - 0 and 2000 km / h? laughing

    Of course not. You forgot about the back
  9. AML
    -1
    1 January 2022 23: 34
    Quote: dauria
    The Americans threw out theirs. And we do not have so much "dough". So they figure out where to attach it.

    Don't talk nonsense. First of all, the transition from drawing boards to electronic design and construction using VR has been completed.
    That is why the hunter is fast and the Su 75.
    All models have complete unification in critical matters.
  10. +1
    2 January 2022 08: 29
    Everything is in the future tense. It will be created, will be released soon, will be received by ... a year, it will be compatible.
  11. +1
    2 January 2022 13: 24
    Quote: demiurg
    And it glows like a Christmas tree on the radar screens.

    - For an air-to-air missile, especially if it is made "according to the mind" - the skin and rudders are made of carbon plastics - the frontal EPR is negligible. And even 22 missiles are not fatal.
    And the combat radius of kilometers is 300.

    - And the additional resistance is scanty.
    And also restrictions on overloads.

    - Each rocket weighs 160 kg, 22 rockets 160 * 22 = 3520 kg, with a maximum load of 15 tons for the F-11EX. In addition, this load from 22 missiles is distributed. Therefore, if there are "restrictions on overload", then instead of 9g, for example, only up to 8g ... lol
    Look that there are Russian ones in Syria, that the American ones, where are the combat missions in Iraq. 2-4 rockets / bombs.

    - They take so many bombs / missiles, how much does the flight task require.
    And that's all, that's enough.

    - Take in accordance with the mission for the flight.
    Well, also light aircraft such as falcon and raphal carry tanks on an external sling.

    - Therefore, the relatively small Rafal allows you to carry a total load of 9.5 tons on its suspensions!
    Now it is not 41 or 45 years old when you can fly along the roads for free hunting.
    Now each sortie is first reconnaissance, then the suppression of air defense, then jamming, then a strike in one run.
    The days when stormtroopers dug the front line with their noses are over.

    - And how does this limit the maximum combat load on the aircraft, IF THIS IS REQUIRED FOR THE CALCULATION OF TARGET HITS ?! feel fool
  12. +1
    2 January 2022 13: 34
    Quote: dauria
    it depends on which "box" is ... if the "mechanics" is one ... "automatic" is the other.

    You are kidding, and the man asked the case. Why the hell did they squirm, squeezing everything out of the design of the Su-57? Then hobble the racehorse and tie it to the herd of donkeys?
    It can be seen that there was no original idea. We made an analogue of the F-22, because it was time. Really needed. Then they made the Hunter, because the Americans had one. What for ? And fig knows him, "the Americans have." The Americans threw out theirs. And we do not have so much "dough". So they figure out where to attach it.

    - Whom did the "Americans throw out" ?? Their development and all new models of combat UAVs come out continuously! And they are constantly improving ... Moreover, their speeds are just comparatively moderate, subsonic ... All fighters 95% of their flight time in the air fly on DOzvuk ... smile
  13. 0
    4 January 2022 16: 07
    Quote: Outsider
    - And how does this limit the maximum combat load on the aircraft, IF THIS IS REQUIRED FOR THE CALCULATION OF TARGET HITS ?! feel fool

    No way. In the current realities, when the target is reconnoitered by satellites, UAVs, AWACS and ground means, the planes are guided with their help, it is not necessary to carry 9 tons of bombs. And so please, you can put up an airplane at the air show, hang everything on the pylons that you have enough imagination and compatibility for, and put cast iron in front of it, so to speak, a demonstration of the possibilities.
    1. +2
      5 January 2022 12: 04
      - For example, tank columns of the Russian army are storming the territory of the future independent Novorossia, freeing the oppressed Russian people from the oppression of the w / Banderaites. And here the damned pindosy send to each tank column of the Russian army one F-15EX with a full combat load, "to the eyeballs" with cluster bombs, one plane for one tank regiment:





      The speed of the striking element is ~ 1.5 km / s.
  14. 0
    5 January 2022 12: 33
    Quote: Outsider
    - For example, tank columns of the Russian army are storming the territory of the future independent Novorossia, freeing the oppressed Russian people from the oppression of the w / Banderaites. And here the damned pindosy send to each tank column of the Russian army one F-15EX with a full combat load, "to the eyeballs" with cluster bombs, one plane for one tank regiment:

    And it runs into Tunguska / Shilki / Pantsiri, which will turn it into Swiss cheese. Now, if the adversary (pindos is a Greek curse, if anything, stuck for some reason to the Americans and only in Russia) will throw LGW at the SOFLAM of some SST or JDAM using GPS coordinates (as in your case with 97/105 ), I will believe in it, just don't need to hang 9m on yourself and patrol with them.

    PS What you described is a direct military conflict between Russia and the United States, which is fraught with an exchange of vigorous "gifts" and a general fallout for 200 years. No, thanks. The General Staff has not yet gone down to this, and in the Pentagon, however, too.
    1. +3
      7 January 2022 03: 35
      And it runs into Tunguska / Shilki / Armor, which will turn it into Swiss cheese.

      - On an airplane flying at an altitude of 30 meters at a speed of 900 km / h, they simply will not allow the reaction time (this is why it was endowed with similar properties).
      Now, if the adversary throws LGW at the SOFLAM of some SST or JDAM using GPS coordinates (as in your case with 97/105), I will believe in it, just don’t need to hang 9t on yourself and patrol with them.

      - No, no, no "loitering". A high-altitude reconnaissance reconnaissance aircraft, small, completely invisible from the ground, will establish the most accurate coordinates of the tank column by GPS and they will be received by the F-15E / F-15EX crew. These coordinates will be entered into the on-board computer, which will display the aircraft at the beginning of the combat path and will automatically unload single-use cluster bombs at a predetermined interval (very short). This guarantees almost 100% safety of the aircraft and the completion of the mission (see video above).
      http://pentagonus.ru/publ/18-1-0-261
      PS What you described is a direct military conflict between Russia and the United States, which is fraught with an exchange of vigorous "gifts" and a general fallout for 200 years. No, thanks. The General Staff has not yet gone down to this, and in the Pentagon, however, too.

      - Everyone wants to live, there will be no nuclear war - neither local nor global. Because for the United States it is to finally lose the status of a leader and fall into insignificance under the thumb of the Chinese, and for Russia it is simply to be swallowed up by China with a probability of 146%. The Kremlin understands this, Washington understands this - so there will be no nuclear war between them. And to fight over Ukraine is easy, as they used to fight in the skies of Korea, then they fought in the skies of Vietnam ... In the same way, they would fight in the skies of Ukraine, but there is a nuance: today, Russian fighters and air defenses against American fighters and strikers simply have nothing to catch. From the word "absolutely" ... No modern Russian fighters against the F-22 are viable.
  15. -1
    7 February 2022 02: 34
    In the presentation
    Papier-mâché toy for the price of a real one

    Check and Checkbook, Probationary Ship-Yacht (23900) Put option "Beach boy" Su-47, MiG 1.44 "Cherny eagle"

    PS Champagne. ✓ Free
  16. kig
    0
    22 February 2022 06: 32
    The main novelty for the Russian-speaking community, of course, was the new generation fighter Su-75 - so it is already in the metal, or what? According to the article, yes. Judging by the information in the media, not yet. Author, explain!
  17. 0
    15 March 2022 12: 14
    All this is th ... but! They have become faster and more maneuverable or more economical in fuel consumption and the payload has increased, and so on and so forth. It is obvious that the preservation of the engineering staff and its efficiency is positive. We need a real breakthrough and very few people even understand what it is.