The USC has decided on the terms of putting into operation the submarine missile carrier "Generalissimo Suvorov"

37

The United Shipbuilding Corporation (USC) has decided on the timing of the commissioning of the strategic nuclear missile submarine Generalissimo Suvorov. The submarine belongs to the project 955A "Borey-A".

About it сообщает news agency TASS, citing sources in the defense industry.



They claim that the submarine will be transferred to the Naval the fleet RF in the first half of 2023. On December 25, the submarine has already left the boathouse of the Sevmash shipyard, which belongs to USC. The company did not begin to confirm or deny the information on the timing of the transfer of the ship, announced by the agency.

The next stage for the submarine will be its launching, scheduled for January 2022, and the completion of its construction, which will be carried out directly at the berth. By the autumn of the same year, she will be ready to start the factory mooring and sea trials. At the final stage, before the submarine is handed over to the fleet, it will have to go through state tests.

Like other submarines of Project 955A and its predecessor Project 955, Generalissimo Suvorov will be armed with 16 R-30 Bulava ICBMs, which makes it and similar Russian submarines one of the most powerful and dangerous submarines in the world capable of inflict colossal damage to the enemy.

Another advantage of this nuclear-powered submarine is its hull, which makes it extremely difficult to determine the location of the submarine using the most modern detection equipment.
  • https://vk.com/aosevmash
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    28 December 2021 16: 39
    They claim that the submarine will be handed over to the Russian Navy in the first half of 2023.

    Why cast a shadow over the wattle fence?
    Until July 1, 2023 !!!
    We wait.
    1. +7
      28 December 2021 16: 59
      Again, links to abstract sources. It might as well be a plumber working near MO.
      This was reported by the TASS news agency, referring to defense sources
    2. +4
      28 December 2021 17: 04
      Quote: yuriy55
      Why cast a shadow over the wattle fence?
      Until July 1, 2023 !!!
      We wait.

      Something is not clear, this is the third project 955A missile carrier, why such a long time from launching to commissioning? In theory, all the shortcomings of the project should be eliminated on the third submarine. But the deadlines are still long.
      1. +9
        28 December 2021 17: 09
        Albeit insignificant, but improvements continue to be made to the design of each new submarine. By the way, in 2022, a contract should be signed for two more Borey-A class cruisers, then there will be 12 Borey / Borey-A class cruisers.



        The ceremony of withdrawal of the cruiser Generalissimus Suvorov from the Sevmash slipway took place on December 25. The ship was laid down at the shipyard on December 26, 2014. The missile carrier belongs to the fourth generation of nuclear submarines of the improved Borey-A project (designed by the Rubin St. Petersburg Central Design Bureau of Marine Engineering). Fundamentally new technical solutions have been implemented in the project, equipment has been improved, the level of physical fields has been reduced, safety has been increased, and a set of work on import substitution has been completed.

        Earlier, a TASS source said that a contract is expected to be signed in 2022 for the construction of another pair of Borei-A strategic missile carriers. Their laying should take place at Sevmash in 2023.

        Currently, the Russian Navy has three submarines of the base project 955 Borey: Yuri Dolgoruky, Vladimir Monomakh and Alexander Nevsky, as well as two submarines of the modernized project 955A: Prince Vladimir and Prince Oleg. Five more submarines Borey-A - Emperor Alexander III, Prince Pozharsky, Generalissimo Suvorov, Dmitry Donskoy and Prince Potemkin - are at different stages of construction.

        https://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/13313167
        1. +7
          28 December 2021 17: 19
          Quote: OrangeBigg
          The design of each new submarine continues to be made, albeit insignificant, but improvements.

          If they are insignificant, then there should not be such long periods, 1,5 years from launching to entering the fleet. In the United States, small changes are probably also constantly being introduced inside each block of submarines, but they have 6 months from launch to commissioning.
          1. -1
            28 December 2021 17: 30
            In a hurry you will make people laugh. The quieter you go on will. There may be different hobbies, but everything has its own time. An example of the F-35 jambs is indicative. Where they hurried so that an unprepared and essentially crude plane was launched into a series. Because someone wanted it that way. And besides. unnecessary haste and stress can affect the quality of submarines.
            In 2011, the United States decided to double the rate of submarine construction: instead of one Virginia-class nuclear submarine, to commission two per year. It turned out that such plans of the country's Navy caused serious tension at American shipyards and among enterprises supplying numerous components for submarines, writes the military analytical publication Defense News.

            Moreover, experts warn that when the construction of nuclear submarines with Columbia-class ballistic missiles begins, America's shipbuilding industry will have to supply the fleet with three nuclear submarines every year.
            Faster with each entry
            The situation is aggravated by the fact that the US Navy has shortened the time it takes to commission submarines. According to the military, shipbuilders have already gained experience in building a new series of submarines. In the United States, they traditionally rely on the model of laying, building and commissioning a fleet of submarines with a gradual decrease in the time and cost for each subsequent unit in the series. Thus, the construction period for the first four Virginia boats (Block I) was 84 months. For the next six (Block II) - already 74 months. The eight Block III submarines currently under construction have a 66-month deadline. For submarines of the final Block IV, it will be reduced to 62, and then to 60 months.

            https://m.gazeta.ru/army/2017/03/19/10583849.shtml
        2. 0
          29 December 2021 14: 16
          To dilute these "princes-emperors" with Generalissimo Stalin ...
      2. +1
        29 December 2021 13: 58
        Quote: Lt. air force reserve
        Something is not clear, this is the third project 955A missile carrier, why such a long time from launching to commissioning?

        In principle, this period can be reduced to several days. That is, all work should be carried out in the boathouse - warm and without precipitation. True, at the same time, to delay the commissioning for at least a year, the introduction of the next ship into the next stage of construction. Choose - how do you like best?
    3. +3
      28 December 2021 17: 08
      Well, how to believe such messages?
      This was reported by the TASS news agency. citing defense sources

      Both designers and plumbers work in the defense industry.
      1. +1
        28 December 2021 20: 13
        many dissatisfied with the absence of 10 units of Av in the Russian Navy. and for some reason the country's top leadership rests on the nuclear submarine id r carriers of the CD and strategic missiles



        that's why they say about plumbers - and the authors are always secret on the site
    4. 0
      28 December 2021 17: 32
      This is good, I agree, but how are things with the Laika-Husky program, or were its "bears" from politics crushed ???
      1. +3
        28 December 2021 17: 55
        The R&D stage has been completed. We have entered the R&D stage. In short, it is being developed. But there a new reactor is expected. In short, not soon.
  2. +8
    28 December 2021 16: 40
    Another advantage of this nuclear-powered submarine is its hull, which makes it extremely difficult to determine the location of the submarine using the most modern detection equipment.
    A very strange statement. It will be difficult to find a submarine if a whole range of measures and hull capabilities are implemented, only a part of these components.
  3. WWI
    -16
    28 December 2021 16: 46
    If, again, the Russians do not burn the pests.
    1. +3
      28 December 2021 16: 55
      Now they will not be burnt, after each welder there are 28 people with fire extinguishers, after the last fire.lol
    2. +8
      28 December 2021 17: 01
      Quote: WWI
      If, again, the Russians do not burn the pests.

      Take the pump and inflate your invincible fleet.
      1. +1
        28 December 2021 17: 32
        Quote: Piramidon
        If, again, the Russians do not burn the pests.

        Take the pump and inflate your invincible fleet.

        There is not enough money for glue, so the pump will not help.
    3. 0
      28 December 2021 17: 05
      Quote: WWI
      If, again, the Russians do not burn the pests.

      Take the pump and inflate your mighty fleet.
  4. +1
    28 December 2021 16: 46
    The place is vacated, you can lay the next one
    1. NKT
      +4
      28 December 2021 17: 19
      Two more are to be laid next year. And there they might start Borei-K.
  5. +1
    28 December 2021 16: 48
    Well, the timing is quite realistic, the hull is ready, and the contractors have already shipped some of the equipment, it remains to mount, mooring and running gear and that's it ...
  6. +16
    28 December 2021 16: 55
    But Generalissimo Stalin, who was the commander of the four countries, as if it were not there!
    1. +4
      28 December 2021 17: 35
      Quote: zenion

      And here is Generalissimo Stalin, who was the commander of four countries

      The name Stalin is taboo.
      1. 0
        30 December 2021 16: 51
        Liberals ???
        They always have a taboo on the Great Man of his Epoch - Stalin!
        But the common people will always remember his name and his deeds as the Best Leader of the Land of Soviets.
        1. -1
          30 December 2021 17: 33
          Quote: Joker62
          Liberals ???
          They always have a taboo on the Great Man of his Epoch - Stalin!

          All Russophobes and haters of the socialist system, where people like them turned their hands away.
  7. -3
    28 December 2021 17: 25
    Disorder, 4 interesting covers are visible in the photo, the CIA officers began to puzzle. On the previous boats, were they interesting?
  8. -2
    28 December 2021 17: 26
    Where is the logic ? Have we run out of princes? Maybe there are no worthy naval commanders of the past? Maybe we have run out of large port cities? Why is the boat named after Suvorov ?! Undoubtedly, this is a glorious name, but Suvorov had practically nothing to do with the fleet, or rather had nothing at all.
    With the same success it would be possible to call the submarine "Boris Yeltsin" or "Ivan the Terrible" this would not mean anything at all .. if you need a symbolic name, then the symbolism should be at least a little logical.
    1. +1
      30 December 2021 18: 17
      Quote: Knell Wardenheart
      ... With the same success one could call the submarine "Boris Yeltsin" or "Ivan the Terrible", this would not mean anything at all ..

      Sweetheart! No need to confuse one mediocre leader to compare with the ruler of Ivan the Terrible! These are completely different categories.
      1. -1
        30 December 2021 18: 48
        Whoa! Here Suvorov connects with submarines as much, if not less, than EBN with IVG))
  9. +10
    28 December 2021 17: 34
    Generalissimo Stalin is also a good name.
    1. 0
      29 December 2021 02: 38
      Generalissimo Stalin is also a good name.
      .... ok ... but for a strategic nuclear icebreaker .... like "here I am ... and what"
  10. -7
    28 December 2021 17: 52
    It is a pity that during the threatened period of this, I’m not afraid of the word, a handsome man - no one will be able to cover for reaching the line of attack crying
    1. +2
      28 December 2021 22: 44
      There is someone to cover for diesel and nuclear submarines - SSBNs will not go far from our shores in the Arctic Ocean and they will launch launches in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk.
      1. -4
        29 December 2021 12: 42
        Quote: Vadim237
        There is someone to cover for diesel and nuclear submarines - SSBNs will not go far from our shores in the Arctic Ocean and they will launch launches in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk.

        In a threatened period, these lines will be blocked with mines, PLO-maneuvers, aviation. Tightly. And we have very big problems with minesweepers, naval reconnaissance (and aviation in general).
        1. -1
          29 December 2021 18: 13
          What kind of mines they will mine - all the ships and aircraft of the anti-ship missile defense system in the Arctic Ocean and the Sea of ​​Okhotsk from our territory will be shot past civilian military ships there do the heck go every hour they will disrupt the entire operation of covert mining from nuclear submarines - the very first explosion on a mine, and even enemy submarines in a threatened period will stay away from these places, since warships and our submarines are constantly on duty in these places and here they will be strengthened - and single campaigns without the cover of anti-submarine aircraft and their own fleet will be pure suicide. And what kind of sea reconnaissance is still needed there are over-the-horizon radars Volna and Container in the fleet at a range of 3000 ships and aircraft can track there are A 50U aircraft there is a system for detecting and guiding surface targets Liana. And the problem with minesweepers will eventually be solved, and with submarines, at least 20 more diesel ones will be purchased in addition to the existing orders 663.6 and 677 projects until 2035 for the Northern Fleet and Pacific Fleet.
          1. -4
            30 December 2021 15: 22
            Quote: Vadim237
            civilian ships there do the heck run every hour

            During the threatening period, civil shipping will be completely closed.
            It is clear that almost all the seas will be shot through, here the question is different, so that there are forces and means to carry out this.
            since warships and our submarines are constantly on duty in these places and here they will be strengthened

            Will you tell me our PLO forces in this area?
            Container in the fleet at a range of 3000

            ZGRLS has many restrictions. In the radio silence mode, it will not see anything. If he sees it, it will be uninformative, and who will give the control center? Also ZGRLS? How many of them do we have on the coast of the Arctic Ocean?
            there are A 50U aircraft

            How much do we have in service with them, do you know?
            Liana surface target detection and guidance system

            How many satellites are currently functioning in the system and what area can they cover? At least once, with the help of Liana, someone was able to give out the control center?
            eventually decide

            I've heard this many, many times. crying
  11. +7
    28 December 2021 20: 52
    Knell Wardenheart (Knell), dear, Alexander Vasilyevich Suvorov - Prince of Italy, Count of Rymnik from the Russian Empire, and also the Count of the Holy Roman Empire. During the storming of Ishmael, the rowing flotilla (commanded by de Ribas) did not contribute to the storming of the fortress? And what about the Suvorov military channels for the Saimaa flotilla, which was subordinate to Suvorov? ...
    About the names of our ships was in the comments on "V.O." not a big discussion, maybe you have not forgotten the story of the renaming of the project 22800 RTOs "Hurricane", Typhoon "and" Shkval "?
    Who and how gives names to the ships of our Navy is the main secret that Malchish-Kibalchish did not tell the damned bourgeoisie. Ask 99% of site visitors: "Why was there a project 50 TFR with the name" Grisons "in the USSR Navy?" The question will be immediately opposite: "And the grisons are who or what?"
    After all, there were: "Jaguar", "Cougar" and "Puma". Scary predator "Stork"? And the Penguin? How do you like "Pelican", "Elk", "Deer", "Bison", "Bison" - these are all the names of our TFRs of project 50 ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"