Nikita Mikhalkov: Anti-Russian statements of the West are similar to manifestation of self-doubt

41

The statements of the representatives of the highest authorities of Western countries that Russia is "an aggressive country that threatens not only its neighbors, but the whole world" is already difficult to surprise anyone. These theses are promoted day by day. And they have no end, no edge.

This topic was also raised by President Vladimir Putin during his press conference. He noted that the Western special services, even after the collapse of the Soviet Union, continued their attempts to destroy Russia as well, despite the fact that in the 90s Russia itself proclaimed a pro-Western course. Putin recalled that even the Russian nuclear weapon was under the control of American observers. But, apparently, this did not seem enough to Washington - sponsorship of extremism and terrorism in the North Caucasus began.



Vladimir Putin:

What for?..

And today, when the Western "partners" failed to plunge Russia into the chaos of internecine wars, when our country withstood even the most difficult periods, a feeling of imperfectness arises. Even a kind of resentment that Russia did not fall apart and fell at his feet. In such a situation, all statements about Moscow's "aggressive" intentions look like a manifestation of the Western fear that was passed on to individual Western officials and generals since the Cold War, from the era of the Soviet Union.

Nikita Mikhalkov, in his Besogon episode, reflects on this, giving specific examples and calling the British Foreign Minister, who climbed onto a tank in a bulletproof vest in Estonia and threatened Russia, a “sheep”. According to Mikhalkov, all this anti-Russian rhetoric is similar either to hysteria or to statements by fussy and insecure in themselves, despite their external visual power.

41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    25 December 2021 14: 58
    The master is right! Whatever he was, but a Russian person! And under the slogans "An aggressive country that threatens not only its neighbors, but the whole world" even German crusaders invaded! Since then, nothing much has changed laughing
    1. -3
      25 December 2021 17: 01
      I respect your opinion, but ...
      Who can be threatened by a country * whose elite * is all dependent on the West? Children, deposits, connections, houses, etc., etc., etc. Putin's theses? Recent? Don't you think that they are designed for ... * internal consumer *? Why? Too many demands, which is alarming. Mikhalkov? Well, let's see his latest films?
      After that, everything becomes clear, including his * house * on Nikolina Gora, under the signboard * Object of the Government of the Russian Federation. laughing
    2. -2
      25 December 2021 18: 46
      But you did not answer, I will note. laughing
  2. -1
    25 December 2021 14: 58
    Nikita Mikhalkov: Anti-Russian statements of the West are similar to manifestation of self-doubt
    ... Similar / not similar, to themselves ... what actions, actions they will begin to do, then we'll see what it will be like ...
  3. +2
    25 December 2021 15: 24
    Nonsense, just enemies of the communists in the West, in Europe, on the territory of the USSR, they fiercely hate dissent even among each other, for which they attacked Yanukovych, Putin, Trump.
    And they are waging their information war against the Russian enemies of the communists according to the same template by which the Russian enemies of the communists themselves are waging their information war against the Soviet communists.
    1. -4
      25 December 2021 17: 48
      Irina, if we ignore your clichés, yes, there is an information war going on. It was. Byla. Were they helped? No? Now? Draw the image of our today's "allies." Who are they?
      1. +6
        25 December 2021 19: 02
        This is for YOU, enemies of the USSR and the Soviet people, some cliches and manuals, the meaning of which you yourself do not understand, like the fact that you have "the USSR collapsed."
        It is the USSR, despite the "cold war" unleashed by the West against it, there were countries of the socialist camp and a bunch of "friendly regimes" in the world, and the enemies of the USSR who seized the RSFSR were people of too low quality to grow up to understand what geopolitics and areas of interest are ... Therefore, and despite the fact that Putin forgave other countries $ 150 billion that those countries owed the Soviet Union, and even gave other countries a lot of money, the Russian Federation has "enemies" all around.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. The comment was deleted.
  4. +3
    25 December 2021 16: 15
    My friends! Look at the situation more broadly ... Everything that happens is explained only in terms of geopolitics. No momentary situations, alliances, manifestations and other manifestations of various kinds will show the full depth of the confrontation of modern civilizations ... The concept of a "unipolar world" is in full swing, the "middle lands" are agitated, and everyone is against Russia as a state, as a nation, as a subject, as a culture, ideas, thoughts, etc.
    And rightly so ... Now there is a struggle not for the country, for wealth, for life ... There is a struggle for the FUTURE. So that it contains our country, our life and ourselves ...
    1. 0
      25 December 2021 16: 58
      Quote: Markus Wolf
      No momentary situations, alliances, manifestations and other manifestations of different textures will show the full depth of the confrontation of modern civilizations ...

      I agree with this, but I see no reason for our unawareness of these depths.
      Quote: Markus Wolf
      and everyone is against Russia as a state, as a nation, as a subject, as a culture, ideas, thoughts, etc.

      This is unambiguous, as well as against tsarist Russia and against the USSR, so the turn has come to present-day Russia.
      Quote: Markus Wolf
      There is a fight for the FUTURE. So that it contains our country, our life and ourselves ...

      And this is true. About "we ourselves" is certainly good, but it is better to have an orientation towards our more distant descendants ...
      1. -3
        25 December 2021 17: 34
        In order to have a reference point ... for the future. I would like to have a reference point for today. Who are they? The ruling regime? And what do they bring to the peoples of Russia? While one can see the insane accumulation of wealth among the clique * of the ruling * and? Gradual / somewhere and a sharp / impoverishment of ordinary citizens. And so, yes. As always!
        "We have lived together this difficult year for us ......". bully
        1. -4
          25 December 2021 17: 41
          Quote: Phil77
          Who are they? The ruling regime? And what do they bring to the peoples of Russia?

          The thing is that Russia, as a state, has existed for more than a thousand years, and its history has had ups and downs. And therefore, focusing on the current in the historical perspective is like discussing whether the tsars did the right thing at the expense of the people, who built empires, or who spent colossal money on the war with Turkey.
          As for a just society, they tried to create it in the USSR, but the people refused this in 1991, because they wanted to live under wild capitalism, which they received in the end. Who do you want to appeal to now, if the majority of the people support Putin and his course, judging by the elections to all power structures.
          1. -3
            25 December 2021 18: 00
            * to all structures of power ... *
            My God! Do you really think so ???? Yes, you would listen to what they say about him and his "friends * in our .... * smoking room * !!!! Elections? Well, he said about this a long time ago, no !, sang !, a certain Sergei Shnurov. Remind me? bully
            1. -1
              25 December 2021 20: 28
              Quote: Phil77
              Yes, you should have listened to what they say about him and his "friends * in our .... * smoking room * !!!!

              Unfortunately, the majority of our people do not visit your smoking room, but nevertheless, in the elections they vote for edros, not the Communist Party.

              Quote: Phil77
              Yes, it was we, that generation, that "fucked up" this state.

              In this I completely agree with you and do not deny part of my guilt.
              Quote: Phil77
              Who does not have the courage to say that: - "I? Yes, guilty. For under me the state collapsed, and I did nothing."
              So?

              I can only say about myself - yes, I am guilty that I hoped that our people are more literate, but it turned out that this is not so. That is why the majority turned out to be at a broken trough. Apparently we didn’t deserve anything else ...
              1. -4
                25 December 2021 20: 34
                Question: So who are you, the director, the citizen, the prince ???? Nikita Mikhalkov?
                1. -2
                  26 December 2021 09: 47
                  Quote: Phil77
                  So who are you, director, citizen, prince ???? Nikita Mikhalkov?
                  This family has always been close to power, accepted all the conditions of existence and took advantage of it. But Mikhalkov, to his credit, raises a number of issues that our people should ponder over, and for this he should be thanked. And who he really is, or who he thinks he is, I don't really care. I do not perceive his personal work as a director, but the civil position of the current Mikhalkov is clear to me and I support it, whoever he considers himself to be.
              2. The comment was deleted.
              3. The comment was deleted.
          2. 0
            25 December 2021 18: 11
            1991? Yes! It was we, that generation, who "pissed away" this state. I? I confess. For what? For many! Who does not have the courage to say that: - "I? Yes. Guilty. Because under me the state collapsed, and I haven't done anything. "
            So?
  5. -2
    25 December 2021 18: 17
    can you make a movie.
    1. -2
      25 December 2021 18: 25
      He will not remove it. Everything. In the past. And? Name.
      1. -3
        25 December 2021 18: 51
        everybody is fucked up and we didn’t know
        1. -4
          25 December 2021 19: 23
          Eh, guys. It's always worth thinking. Thinking, and then waving his swords. Who is Mikhalkov, Putin, other things. And who are we? People, like, Russia? Peoples? And where are we?
        2. -3
          26 December 2021 07: 58
          Are there any illusions about ... tomorrow?
  6. -1
    25 December 2021 19: 32
    How much negative is it in relation to Hollywood ... Resentment is right between the lines. Who is stopping you from doing the same fees yourself, are you so talented?
    And referring to the fact that so many repressions against Jews were shown in vain, what is this? belay
    1. -4
      25 December 2021 19: 41
      Buddy, come on in order, eh? Mikhalkov is wrong. That is understandable. Next?
      1. 0
        25 December 2021 19: 55
        The discussion is correct, it seems to me. Not right, because he himself exists in world cinema. And the mention of Jews in general, as it were, is softer, incorrect.
        1. -3
          25 December 2021 20: 01
          Yes, Jews have something to do with it? Who is Mikhalkov? That's the question !!!
        2. -3
          25 December 2021 20: 03
          He was. He was in the world cinema. The last of him, what?
    2. -3
      25 December 2021 19: 48
      Buddy, who is Mikhalkov?
      1. -3
        25 December 2021 20: 03
        I know that he has an Oscar, one. Otherwise, I don’t think it’s "the conscience of the nation." But still, weird ...
        1. 0
          25 December 2021 20: 27
          What is he * the conscience of the nation * ???? Who is he in general ???? After his "Burnt * ??!? There was such a director-Nikita Mikhalkov. He shot several films, yes! Successful! It was! But ??? ¿? Burnt sun -2 ???
          1. -3
            25 December 2021 20: 36
            It's a matter of taste, of course. But his Oscar is far from Schindler's List or Forest Gump ...
            1. -4
              26 December 2021 08: 18
              Here. Specifically. According to the list. I agree with you. hi
          2. -1
            25 December 2021 20: 38
            Quote: Phil77
            What is he * the conscience of the nation * ???? Who is he in general ???? After his "Burnt * ??!? There was such a director, Nikita Mikhalkov. He shot several films, yes! Successful! It was! But ??? ¿?"Burnt by the sun -2 ??? This movie ???

            ===
            Well, the first part was nothing.
          3. -1
            25 December 2021 22: 13
            I like. I look at 4 tankers. omega option. about the clossa. rightly a matter of taste. Shas showed STALINGRAD. I visited the USSR straight.
            1. -3
              26 December 2021 07: 07
              This is called Internal emigration.
        2. -4
          25 December 2021 20: 44
          My friend. This is what he is. Po putinsky-otdyha.Po Russian? -Kirdyk !!!!
  7. +1
    25 December 2021 20: 36
    Anti-Russian statements by the West look like a manifestation of self-doubt
    ===
    maybe these statements are due to the uncertainty of Russia
  8. +1
    25 December 2021 20: 45
    It's not that simple. The author showed us one side of the moon. But there is also another. Is there a threat of the collapse of the country? Not yet. But if you look at national politics, you can see that each republic leads an increasingly secluded life. We are talking about ordinary people who do not have many opportunities to travel to other regions. The penetration of cultures of all nationalities leaves much to be desired. There are strong supporters of the system, and there are supporters of the preservation of everything human that has been since the founding of Russia. And this contradiction will only grow stronger. Everything is in our hands. No State Department will make us obedient servants if we do not want it inside. But for this you need to look more closely at your affairs.
    1. -1
      25 December 2021 23: 52
      Is this country worth collapsing ?? Look at it? Who leads it? Who inhabits it? Do you like it? Is it the future?
  9. -2
    25 December 2021 23: 49
    There would be someone to discuss, eh? Is it worth it?
  10. 0
    19 February 2022 16: 35
    Quote: Phil77
    * to all structures of power ... *
    My God! Do you really think so ???? Yes, you would listen to what they say about him and his "friends * in our .... * smoking room * !!!! Elections? Well, he said about this a long time ago, no !, sang !, a certain Sergei Shnurov. Remind me?


    "In the smoking room" the descendants of serfs scold the "white master", just as 40 years ago their fathers scolded the "red master". Just as their ancestors scolded Peter the 1st at the stable..But absolutely nothing follows from this.....they are the same as they were under Peter. They cannot do without a master. And so the existing order is generally supported. Just like with Nekrasov in "Who Lives Well in Russia" - they got together and argued, and even slapped each other on the mugs. And they do not need any "elections", they will still vote for the current Tsar. Because; "... and for whom else?"
  11. 0
    19 February 2022 17: 06
    Quote: nikvic46
    Everything is in our hands, Not a single State Department will make obedient servants of us if we don’t want it inside

    "Everything is in our hands" was already in the USSR. There was a Supreme Soviet, elected by the people, with more rights. than the State Duma of the Russian Federation. The USSR was a union of parliamentary republics, where the Top Council could change the government simply at its regular session. Without the permission of presidents and senators. In the history of the USSR there were also congresses of Soviets, which had enormous rights. There was a ruling VKPb / CPSU, where, according to the charter, all positions were elected and accountable ... but what's the point?
    The people are united under Soviet democracy, and live under anti-Soviet democracy - as under an autocratic monarchy. He will never want to live differently. His path is into the darkness of the past. And he won't want to leave it for anything. This is destiny !