American politician: For guarantees of NATO's non-expansion to the east, the United States may demand reciprocal concessions from Moscow

112

The United States should accept the Russian Federation's proposals to guarantee its security. But in order to guarantee that NATO will not expand to the east, the United States may demand reciprocal concessions from Moscow.

This opinion was expressed by Patrick Buchanan in his article for The American Conservative (TAC). Buchanan is an American politician with more experience in the Republican Party. However, in the end, he left its composition from the views that the party members did not share.



Last week, the Kremlin, represented by Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov, presented Washington and NATO with two draft treaties that spell out security guarantees for Russia. At first glance, Buchanan believes, not all of Moscow's demands are acceptable to the West. But he advises the leaders of the United States and the countries of the North Atlantic Alliance not to reject the Kremlin's proposals immediately, but to study them carefully, since they open up good prospects for the Americans as well. Indeed, many of the commitments made during the Cold War are now outdated and unprofitable for Washington.

Moscow's main demand is a written guarantee from the West that Ukraine and Georgia will not become NATO members. On the other hand, the alliance does not particularly want to see these countries in its ranks.

So why then doesn't Washington document this?

- says the American politician.

It is noted that this would also solve the problem for the alliance - to admit it to the country, because of which the threat to the alliance itself will grow at times and even a war may flare up.


And in response, the United States could offer to conclude an agreement with the Russian Federation on restrictions on the deployment of missile weapons in Europe. Also, Buchanan believes, Washington would be interested in a reduction in activity. fleet и aviation sides near the borders of the United States and Russia. At the very least, this would reduce the costs of the American budget for numerous patrols in thousands of kilometers from its borders.

Thus, according to the American author, the United States, and not only Russia, could benefit from the adoption of security guarantees.
  • NATO
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

112 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +37
    25 December 2021 09: 32
    This is what Russia wants. Do not fly or swim where you do not need it and everyone will be happy.
    1. +14
      25 December 2021 09: 57
      Concession? Okay, we'll wait a while with -

      Slowly the rockets fly away,
      Meet with them you do not wait.
      And although America is a little sorry
      Europe is ahead ...
      laughing
      1. -36
        25 December 2021 10: 12
        Do you have relatives and friends? And them to (paradise)?
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. -19
                25 December 2021 12: 27
                Quote: Finches
                I have already said that it is never scary to die for the Motherland! And you, we see, told your grandchildren - Sell your Motherland - you will stay alive! laughing It happens!

                Dying is always scary, and when children or grandchildren die, it's generally monstrous.
                And the reason doesn't matter.
                Although you probably won't understand
                1. +15
                  25 December 2021 12: 29
                  Monstrous, but we are not the first to start! Because there are monsters on the other side! And you advocate!
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                    1. +17
                      25 December 2021 12: 52
                      Yes, I'm a naive person! Like millions of Russian men before me ... Participants of the Battle of Kulikovo, Poltava, the defense of Sevastopol, Borodino, the battle for Moscow ...!
                      1. -24
                        25 December 2021 13: 40
                        Quote: Finches
                        Yes, I'm a naive person! Like millions of Russian men before me ... Participants of the Battle of Kulikovo, Poltava, the defense of Sevastopol, Borodino, the battle for Moscow ...!

                        Well, you know everything about them.
                      2. +1
                        26 December 2021 18: 01
                        Well Buchanan gives it! The State Department needs to think how to slowly and more carefully crawl away with a clever expression on his face, and he proposes to set new conditions! It wouldn't hurt Buchanan to roll up his lips! laughing
                    2. +15
                      25 December 2021 13: 01
                      You are our compassionate, do not carry nonsense here. You are not here to mumble about the concept of "homeland".
                    3. 0
                      25 December 2021 22: 10
                      you. In real life, I would crush a nit
                  2. +8
                    25 December 2021 13: 12
                    Quote: Arpad
                    Quote: Finches
                    I have already said that it is never scary to die for the Motherland! And you, we see, told your grandchildren - Sell your Motherland - you will stay alive! laughing It happens!
                    Dying is always scary, and when children or grandchildren die, it's generally monstrous.
                    And the reason doesn't matter.
                    Although you probably won't understand

                    Quote: Finches
                    Monstrous, but we are not the first to start! Because there are monsters on the other side! And you advocate!

                    Arpad advocates the United States and NATO, not noticing that he advocates, including Japan, in the same way as in 1938 Poland - "the hyena of Europe - (in this case, now Japan) supported Hitler in Germany in the Munich Agreement of 1938. And exactly.
                    Japanese expert: If the United States shows weakness in Ukraine, China will take this as a signal for action against Taiwan
                    Let me remind you of the history of WWII.
                    Agreement between Germany, Great Britain, France and Italy, drawn up in Munich on September 29, 1938 and signed on the night of September 29-30 of the same year by Reich Chancellor of Germany Adolf Hitler, Prime Minister of Great Britain Neville Chamberlain, Prime Minister of France Edouard Daladier and Prime Minister of Italy Benito Mussolini. The agreement stipulated that Czechoslovakia would liberate and cede the Sudetenland to Germany within 10 days.
                    Under pressure from Poland and Hungary, annexes were added to the Munich agreement, requiring Czechoslovakia to resolve territorial disputes with these countries as soon as possible.

                    What kind of "pity" for Russian children in the war on the part of the INVADER of Russian lands - on the part of the ENEMY of Russia - is the naive Arpad talking about demagogically ?!
                    You either protect your children, or you yourself cowardly give them to the enemy in captivity for mockery and death!
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                    2. The comment was deleted.
                      1. The comment was deleted.
                      2. The comment was deleted.
                      3. The comment was deleted.
                      4. The comment was deleted.
                  3. The comment was deleted.
                2. The comment was deleted.
                3. +7
                  25 December 2021 14: 39
                  Quote: Arpad
                  Dying is always scary, and when children or grandchildren die, it's generally monstrous.
                  And the reason doesn't matter.
                  Although you probably won't understand

                  And if your children, grandchildren, beloved woman are in danger of death? Not clear too? What, what, and the Russians do not want war at all! But there is no need to tease and bully the peace-loving Russian people. And then the bully will be very painful, lethally painful.
                  1. -12
                    25 December 2021 14: 48
                    Quote: 30 vis
                    And if your children, grandchildren, beloved woman are in danger of death? Not clear too?

                    none of you is in danger of death. do not pull the owl over the globe. no one is going to attack Russia and no one needs it.
                    Don't touch anyone and no one will touch you for sure.
                    You are pumped up the degree of war (power) for one reason, the administrative resource has ended, the current model has exhausted itself, and no one wants to share power and money. Therefore, the war and the image of the enemy is the best way to justify a complete failure inside the country.
                    Nothing new under the moon. you are not the first.
                    1. +8
                      25 December 2021 14: 53
                      Quote: Arpad
                      You are pumped up the degree of war (power) for one reason, the administrative resource has ended, the current model has exhausted itself, and no one wants to share power and money. Therefore, the war and the image of the enemy is the best way to justify a complete failure inside the country.
                      Nothing new under the moon. you are not the first.

                      Boo ha ha !! You s kryzhopelya comrade, why is ashdod? Here's some good advice for you - Go to the market (if you have money !!) buy a rooster, quality noodles. Boil the noodles, put a rooster in front of you. Then spread the noodles on your ears, and twist the rooster's head, fool the brains. Good luck with this event.
                    2. -1
                      25 December 2021 20: 38
                      "None of you is in danger of death. Do not put an owl on the globe. No one is going to attack Russia and no one needs it" - you will simply be quietly raped and then strangled! But you and others like you cannot understand this or do not want to.
                4. +2
                  25 December 2021 18: 14
                  As someone said - It is better to die while standing than spend your whole life on your knees.
                  You will probably be pleased to see your children and grandchildren in slave chains. But you will console yourself with a thought - but alive.
          2. +5
            25 December 2021 12: 28
            Quote: Finches
            We will go to heaven, and the Anglo-Saxons will simply die!

            Not well, the May decrees of the President of the Russian Federation must be executed. We have heaven in the workshops, they have hell drinks
        2. +6
          25 December 2021 10: 54
          We are in paradise, and you just die.
          1. 0
            25 December 2021 11: 29
            They can ask for a concession! They can and get something for it
            1. +2
              25 December 2021 12: 56
              seregatara1969
              They can and get for it ...

              Is that in the teeth. Stop walking on their leashes. Now their concessions have come.
              1. -1
                26 December 2021 11: 22
                Well, or a magical all-healing pendal
        3. +11
          25 December 2021 11: 26
          Quote: Naive
          Do you have relatives and friends? And them to (paradise)?

          Fearfully? I don’t. I'm already afraid that nothing is scary. Got it!
          1. -21
            25 December 2021 12: 31
            Quote: Gardener91
            Fearfully? I don’t. I'm already afraid that nothing is scary.

            Well this is how much you need to have a good life, so that it would not be scary to die. belay
            1. +9
              25 December 2021 13: 07
              There is nothing to talk about with you, your life is probably a success, find suitable interlocutors for yourself, do you understand?
              1. -14
                25 December 2021 13: 38
                Quote: frruc
                There is nothing to talk about with you, your life is probably a success, find suitable interlocutors for yourself, do you understand?

                Normal life with pluses and minuses like everyone else.
                But not so bad as to give it up for a politician.
            2. +5
              25 December 2021 13: 14
              Quote: Arpad
              Well this is how much you need to have a good life, so that it would not be scary to die.

              Normal life. If I had a chance to live again, I would live exactly like this.
              1. -10
                25 December 2021 13: 36
                Quote: Gardener91
                Quote: Arpad
                Well this is how much you need to have a good life, so that it would not be scary to die.

                Normal life. If I had a chance to live again, I would live exactly like this.

                Each person has changed something in his life if he could live anew.
                1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +3
        25 December 2021 11: 52
        Quote: Finches
        Concession? Okay, we'll wait a while with -

        Slowly the rockets fly away,
        Meet with them you do not wait.
        And although America is a little sorry
        Europe is ahead ...
        laughing

        You can demand anything you want, but the main thing to remember is that you were not handed a menu.
      3. 0
        29 December 2021 08: 38
        Funny. That's just funny. "We can wait with nuclear bombing." Everyone was already scared. Especially the USA. At home, in front of the computer, many people are pretending to be "Terminators". "We can repeat" - you cannot. Wrong country, wrong army, wrong people, wrong economy, wrong industry. "We will definitely zhahn - the whole world is in dust - but then." It was actually a banter, not a call to action. And from my mother’s apartment, sitting in front of the computer, it’s very easy to pretend to be a hero with steel ... body parts and say that “you can wait with the press of a button”.
    2. +2
      25 December 2021 10: 16
      Quote from TigerRR
      Don't fly or swim where you don't need to

      That is the problem: to decide "where it is not necessary". request
      1. +2
        25 December 2021 11: 01
        Determined by international agreements. What else to fence?
        1. +2
          25 December 2021 11: 37
          Quote: YOUR
          Determined by international agreements. What else to fence?

          And the problem is that these international agreements "who needs" are observed only "when they need to." request
          1. -1
            25 December 2021 11: 48
            Give an example
            1. +1
              25 December 2021 12: 21
              Quote: YOUR
              Give an example

              "Open sky".
              1. -1
                25 December 2021 14: 42
                And who did not observe it?
                1. 0
                  25 December 2021 15: 02
                  Quote: YOUR
                  And who did not observe it?

                  It is known who! wassat
                  1. +1
                    25 December 2021 15: 10
                    Let me remind you that the Americans wanted to fly over the Crimea, they were forbidden. Is that what you mean?
                    1. 0
                      25 December 2021 15: 24
                      Quote: YOUR
                      Did you mean that?

                      No. I meant how and how it all ended.
                      And in general, a lot more:
                      https://tokyo.mid.ru/-/ob-istorii-narusenij-i-rastorzenij-ssa-klucevyh-mezdunarodnyh-dogovorov
                      1. 0
                        27 December 2021 11: 15
                        Open sky means open sky. Apply and fly. But no. So who gave the reason?
                      2. 0
                        27 December 2021 18: 35
                        Quote: Vasyan1971
                        And in general, a lot more:
                        https://tokyo.mid.ru/-/ob-istorii-narusenij-i-rastorzenij-ssa-klucevyh-mezdunarodnyh-dogovorov

                        Exceptional gentlemen observe only those agreements and rules that are beneficial to them.
    3. +1
      25 December 2021 11: 18
      You definitely noticed that they swim laughing
    4. +1
      25 December 2021 11: 31
      The idea of ​​this tale
      Or maybe not fairy tales
      Not only an adult will understand
      But even the little one:
      Don't stand and jump
      Don't sing, don't dance
      Where construction is going
      Or a load is suspended.
  2. +6
    25 December 2021 09: 33
    But in order to guarantee that NATO will not expand to the east, the United States may demand reciprocal concessions from Moscow.

    They can. And for this we can promise not to deploy missiles in Mexico ...
    1. +15
      25 December 2021 09: 52
      Mexico would hardly agree, but Nicaragua would definitely give the go-ahead. Whoa country is doing vche to annoy the states. Even Crimea and South Ossetia were recognized with Abkhazia.
      1. +5
        25 December 2021 10: 44
        Quote: silver_roman
        Mexico would hardly agree

        And if you propose to return the borders before the American-Spanish War? And to the French to promise Louisiana and the whole, and not the modern state, if not legally sold land?
        1. +1
          25 December 2021 11: 30
          Quote: Tusv
          And if you offer

          These topics, as taken as part of the information policy and educational program of the "civilized community", need to be dealt with on a regular basis.
          1. +1
            25 December 2021 12: 03
            The field was not plowed during the work. And they are for us in return. Well, we will not try to persuade Macron to capture Louisiana. Why not in return?
            1. +1
              26 December 2021 21: 32
              The problem is that (macron) doesn't need Louisiana and Mexicans don't need Mexican Texas, they need to live in American American. It is your painful desire to restore historical justice (only every nation has its own, and here there is also evolution, and people refuse to make claims for the sake of Life!) So such attempts are deliberately failed.
        2. -5
          25 December 2021 12: 35
          Quote: Tusv
          Quote: silver_roman
          Mexico would hardly agree

          And if you propose to return the borders before the American-Spanish War? And to the French to promise Louisiana and the whole, and not the modern state, if not legally sold land?

          Just not a plowed regiment for Mongolia or Turkey.
          They have something to think about.
          By the way, Russia until the 17th century paid tribute to the Crimean khans,
          When you offer something, don't you beat up an equivalent answer?
          Well, like, that would not be double standards.
          1. -2
            25 December 2021 12: 43
            Quote: By the way, Russia until the 17th century paid tribute to the Crimean khans,
            By the way, Russia until the 17th century paid tribute to the Crimean khans,

            “There were demons, I don’t deny, but they self-destructed.” Now the loyal subjects of Her Majesty Mother Russia live beautifully in the bosom of the Mother. What I wish for you too
          2. +1
            25 December 2021 14: 04
            Quote: Arpad
            By the way, Russia until the 17th century paid tribute to the Crimean khans,

            And the United States until the beginning of the 19th century to Algerian pirates. And the US presidents gave dinners at the White House to mark the end of negotiations to pay tribute to Algerian pirates in compliance with Sharia law.
            1. 0
              25 December 2021 14: 06
              Quote: gsev
              And the United States until the beginning of the 19th century to Algerian pirates. And the US presidents gave dinners at the White House on the occasion of the end of negotiations on the payment of tribute to Algerian pirates in compliance with Sharia law.

              here I am about the same, remembering what happened during the reign of Tsar Pea
              Quote: Tusv
              And if you propose to return the borders before the American-Spanish War? And to the French to promise Louisiana and the whole, and not the modern state, if not legally sold land?

              Sometimes it's worth remembering your own history.
        3. 0
          26 December 2021 20: 41
          and who will guarantee the fulfillment of obligations?
      2. 0
        25 December 2021 21: 57
        Quote: silver_roman
        Mexico would hardly agree

        Of course, it is unlikely that Mexico would agree, rather it would not agree at all! But the easier it is to promise not to place missiles there, we could))) ...
  3. +5
    25 December 2021 09: 34
    We need to look at specific proposals, maybe that really will work out.
  4. +5
    25 December 2021 09: 36
    Well, not all are fools, there are smart ones who are for dialogue. But only who listens to their opinion?
    1. +5
      25 December 2021 09: 54
      Quote: aleks neym_2
      Well, not all are fools, there are smart ones who are for dialogue. But only who listens to their opinion?

      We got away from the shock and started thinking! This is what the life-giving pendel does. Let's wait and see what they offer. If there are "unacceptable conditions" for them, then we can have the same.
      1. +8
        25 December 2021 10: 09
        Alas, the past 30 years have made it very clear that it is senseless to conclude any agreements with the West if you do not have the strength to make them comply. How many contracts did they let on pipifax during this time? That's the same .. And with real power in the new Russian Federation - whatever you say, but big problems ..

        To understand the situation of relations with these gentlemen, one can ask the question - how many treaties with the Indians in the 19th century did the United States fulfill? The answer is somewhat overwhelming - NOT ONE! And for them we are the same Indians ..
        1. The comment was deleted.
      2. 0
        25 December 2021 10: 58
        Quote: Egoza
        This is what the life-giving pendel does.

        =====
        good lol
        What can you do? If they do not understand well, then they have to:
    2. -3
      25 December 2021 12: 37
      Quote: aleks neym_2
      Well, not all are fools, there are smart ones who are for dialogue. But only who listens to their opinion?

      Dialogue implies reality.
      She doesn't smell like that here
  5. +9
    25 December 2021 09: 38
    What concessions, nowhere to retreat.
  6. +4
    25 December 2021 09: 39
    American politician: For guarantees of NATO's non-expansion to the east, the United States may demand reciprocal concessions from Moscow

    Has the bathhouse fallen from the oak tree? belay
    This is only a return to status at the time of the collapse of the Union.
    And about the rest there is still bargaining to be done.
    So first put everything back in the ass, and then we'll take a look. Yes
    1. +5
      25 December 2021 10: 03
      Quote: K-50
      So first put everything back in the ass, and then we'll take a look.

      Why is it in the ass? Back and forth: what's the difference. The USA today is not in that weight to issue an ultimatum. Eun showed Trump what could happen if the American AUG began to bother him, surfing the Pacific Ocean. Putin (the head of Russia) has an opportunity to demonstrate what can happen to Brussels if they start to "distribute". All these conversations about "NATO will ask aggressive Russia" can be ended literally at once: the threat to Russia's national security and its sovereignty from NATO can force a reconsideration of diplomatic, political and trade ties with especially zealous "members" and "circles" of the bloc.
      No - so no. She died - so she died.
  7. +2
    25 December 2021 09: 39
    RF is located in Europe, not a smart analyst ... At least.
  8. +3
    25 December 2021 09: 40
    I would not be surprised if the demand would be like not to support Madura, Assad and or the same Lukashenka.
    1. 0
      25 December 2021 11: 23
      I cannot suggest any concessions acceptable to us, there are none.
      1. 0
        25 December 2021 11: 46
        There are no concessions for all of us, this is clear to us. And politicians in the West believe that oligarchs rule Russia, so the sanctions system will work. And the question is how right they are.
        1. -2
          25 December 2021 13: 11
          No need to come to us with your recipes and panaceas. We ourselves will somehow solve our problems without their advisers. Let them deal with their problems inside, and if they consider us the main problem, then let them prepare.
  9. +3
    25 December 2021 09: 43
    The thoughts are logical, only this voice will go neither to the US Congress, but to the desert.
    1. +3
      25 December 2021 10: 19
      Quote: askort154
      The thoughts are logical, only this voice will go neither to the US Congress, but to the desert.

      Exactly.
      However, in the end, he left its composition from the views that the party members did not share.
      Party members are not disposed to make concessions and compromises. request
  10. +4
    25 December 2021 09: 47
    What concessions? Now it's their turn.

    Moscow's main demand is a written guarantee from the West that Ukraine and Georgia will not become NATO members.
    This is far from the main and not the only requirement. Everyone knows what they are worth about penguins' written guarantees.
  11. +1
    25 December 2021 09: 56
    They may ask that Crimea again return to Ukraine. Then we will ask to hold another referendum on the territory of all Ukraine, Belarus, who and where wants to live. I think not only Crimea, but also part of Ukraine will want to live under the wing of Russia. And in America, too, ask who wants and how to live further. I think not all states want to live in one community.
    1. -2
      25 December 2021 10: 23
      It would be nice to hold a referendum in Belarus, Ukraine, Crimea, the United States, and many other places, including Russia.
  12. +2
    25 December 2021 09: 57
    It is difficult to say anything if you do not know what concessions they want from the Russian Federation in exchange for not expanding to the East and in security issues.
    1. +1
      25 December 2021 10: 24
      We are no good fortune-tellers. Let's live and hear.
  13. +2
    25 December 2021 10: 13
    "Consent is a product of non-resistance from the parties." ©
    Is there anything else to talk about?
  14. +1
    25 December 2021 10: 14
    I agree, we are changing. They give us Alaska, and we give them a hole from a donut, from a dead donkey.
  15. 0
    25 December 2021 10: 21
    They put a knife to their throat and still demand concessions. Do they take us for fools? When nuclear weapons are removed from Europe, then we can consider what they want. We need to use our hyperboloid (PERESVETO) to shine through the windows of Europe and on NATO ships and planes so that we can think faster. Give them a light show for the new year. negative soldier
  16. +3
    25 December 2021 10: 23
    A reasonable compromise ... in our time this is already a great achievement, it will be.
    1. +2
      25 December 2021 11: 58
      Good time! hi

      There is no other way, it is necessary to agree on any or all to dust ...
      1. +1
        25 December 2021 12: 54
        Hi soldier
        It is too dangerous to be in a pose and to rest the horns against each other.
        We will not yield, we will not surrender ours ... well, so the enemy, although he strives to stand in a pose, he crumples, crumples, the horns are not ah, no more and no stronger than ours.
        1. +2
          25 December 2021 14: 23
          That's just the point, so there are no options how to come to an agreement ...
          1. 0
            25 December 2021 14: 27
            The question is that Uncle Joe, a negotiating partner, worthy, experienced, reasoning sensibly, acting, also knows how / was able ... and more, now, to talk / negotiate NOT WITH WHOM, through the efforts of the same minke.
            Alas, alas ...
            1. +2
              25 December 2021 16: 35
              We'll have to negotiate ...
  17. 0
    25 December 2021 10: 29
    What concessions? They told you to blame while you are alive, so blame without concessions
  18. +3
    25 December 2021 10: 35
    You can. What's the point? "Zircons" will be, "Iskanders" too. And they won't pray for a dollar. (Not from patriotism (where did the bourgeoisie have it from?), But economic risks, so their races are so!) winked
  19. -1
    25 December 2021 11: 04
    I wonder if the Russian Federation supports the claims of the indigenous peoples of the United States to self-determination and secession through diplomatic work, will this serve as an additional incentive for the United States?
  20. The comment was deleted.
  21. 0
    25 December 2021 11: 24
    Russia made all the concessions 30 years ago, and such that it should be a shame to demand something else from us. Now it is the West's turn to give in.
    1. 0
      25 December 2021 11: 40
      These were not "concessions". These were the conditions dictated by the winner. "Woe to the vanquished." The lost war must be won back. Or the Russian Federation will soon be gone. Something like this.
      1. 0
        13 July 2022 10: 39
        Well, this is the Western vision of the situation, it is so much sweeter for them to sleep. I do not remember that the USSR or Russia would sign the act of surrender. The USSR collapsed due to internal systemic problems, some of which were of a conceptual nature. The dissidents (fifth column) mostly took credit for themselves, as did the CIA, who, to be honest, were themselves shocked by the events of that period. Such a "gift" (result) they not only did not plan, but could not even imagine. So there was no victory, there was a weakening of Russia for internal reasons. And you really need to win back your place under the Sun.
  22. -1
    25 December 2021 11: 30
    Generally speaking, the presented ultimatum did not provide for negotiations, especially with NATO. NATO must be disbanded. Or, in the end, the Russian Federation will be dissolved.
    In the economy, bilateral relations should be developed, not relations with the EU. Otherwise, it turns out that the Russian Federation will have Moldavia, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia on the maintenance.
  23. 0
    25 December 2021 11: 43
    American politician: For guarantees of non-expansion of NATO to the east of the United States can demand reciprocal concessions from Moscow
    "They can." But whether the Russian Federation will agree is a big question.
  24. 0
    25 December 2021 11: 45
    What is the interest for the United States to bind itself to agreements? Without them, they have the space to do something or not to do something - with them this space will be less, with the same result. In any case, the United States will develop its anti-missile defense system, because all its opponents are armed with missile weapons, in any case, they will develop anti-aircraft missile defense, in any case, they will rely on a military presence in allied countries, because this is one of the ways to keep them in the American zone influence. The fact that we would agree to the conditionally "neutral" status of Ukraine would play against us in the medium term - all the same, this state is part of the "Russian world", despite the mess that is happening in relations now.
    1. 0
      25 December 2021 13: 16
      Quote: Knell Wardenheart
      all the same, this state is part of the "Russian world", despite the mess that is happening in relations now.

      In this part already 40 (!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) for those who do not remember the USSR .... and 30 - who were born after Union
  25. +1
    25 December 2021 11: 53
    At the very least, this would reduce the costs of the American budget for numerous patrols in thousands of kilometers from its borders.


    That's fine, normal approach ...
  26. 0
    25 December 2021 11: 59
    The United States should accept the Russian Federation's proposals to guarantee its security. But in order to guarantee that NATO will not expand to the east, the United States may demand reciprocal concessions from Moscow.


    in no way does it reach the American that so far Russia has just made concessions to the United States without taking any retaliatory actions. And if the expansion of the US military bloc (NATO) does not end then they will receive such retaliatory actions from Russia that all their existing concerns will seem trifles.
    After all, the Soviet Union's deployment of nuclear missiles in Cuba was only a response after the United States had deployed its nuclear missiles in Turkey.
    At the same time, it is difficult to reproach an American, because since the collapse of the USSR, everyone in the West is accustomed to the fact that Russia gives only passive answers in the form of foreign ministry concerns, while Crimea is considered an exception in the West. And frankly, immediately after Crimea, there were attempts to make peace with the West, which is partly why Mariupol is not currently in the DPR.
    1. 0
      25 December 2021 12: 08
      Quote: lopvlad
      will not end then they will receive such a response from Russia that all their existing concerns seem trifles.

      what, for example ?
  27. +1
    25 December 2021 12: 06
    Ethics .. o called blackmail .. here is the result of the collapse of the Socialist camp .. and the collapse of the USSR .. There was a cure for all this, but as Khrushchev got cold feet, this series of concessions and weakening continues .. No matter how America behaves, it’s she is not ready for the mass deaths of her soldiers .. And she was never ready .. Due to the fact that there was no war on its territory for a very long time, they lost fear .. Nothing will work on them except missiles in Cuba or Latin America ..
  28. 0
    25 December 2021 12: 18
    Concession? No problem! California and Alaska, we leave the United States! hi
  29. 0
    25 December 2021 12: 44
    Here's a howl something will raise all sorts of limitrophes and Ukraine and Georgia will once again be shown their place in the pigsty !!!
  30. -1
    25 December 2021 12: 54
    Quite reasonable and acceptable proposals from the American.
  31. +2
    25 December 2021 13: 13
    Of course, there will be concessions from Moscow. Do not deploy missiles in Mexico. Do not hold a referendum on the formation of the Canadian Federal District. Do not appoint Trump as president. And tydy.
  32. +1
    25 December 2021 14: 10
    It will be beneficial to the whole world, but the Anglo-Saxons do not need it, because the Anglo-Saxons are the offspring of the Devil !!! They want chaos (controlled chaos) around the world except North America, Divide and Conquer.
  33. 0
    25 December 2021 15: 32
    ... Well, at least they don't kiss in public ...
  34. 0
    25 December 2021 17: 01
    Buchanan continues "not to understand" that the "exceptional" should not have climbed into the hallway of Russia. That their time for the dictatorship of Russia has sunk into a pit. And that it would be better for these "Buchanans" to take care of putting things in order in the states. Where the "floyds" are jumping tirelessly. And then, as it were, they did not come to him ...
  35. 0
    25 December 2021 17: 26
    You can make concessions in another way - to give guarantees that we will not deploy missiles in Cuba, for example.
  36. 0
    25 December 2021 19: 53
    Quote: Gondurash

    the ensign will have time to press a button somewhere in Siberia at the point.

    An officer. Only officers are on duty in the start-up mines. Lieutenant and above.
  37. 0
    25 December 2021 19: 59
    Concessions with curtsies were more than 30 years since Humpback came to power. What other concessions to them ???
  38. 0
    25 December 2021 20: 42
    Come on . What concessions? It's too late to drink Borjomi.
  39. CYM
    -1
    25 December 2021 22: 44
    Quote: Arpad
    no one is going to attack Russia and no one needs it.

    Yes, yes, we have already heard such speeches in 1812 and 1941. sad
    As for the concessions to the Americans, it’s easy to understand them: China, Iran, Venezuela, North Korea. Only now, in case of agreement, Russia will also be in this queue, the only question is where. negative
  40. 0
    26 December 2021 11: 37
    The concessions will be that we will not organize military bases in Nicaragua, Venezuela and Cuba!
  41. 0
    27 December 2021 08: 58
    Fuck you for all your insolent face, and not concessions from Russia! Russia MUST demand monetary compensation from the United States for the collapse of our country, illegal sanctions, moving close to our borders and the dashing nineties of no less than a trillion dollars! Do not want? Send Poseidons to the shores of the collective blast mattress mats when attempting to retrieve or eliminate them.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"