German press: Bulgaria opposes the deployment of NATO military contingent on its territory

There are no prerequisites for the deployment of NATO troops on the territory of Bulgaria, and the movement of Russian troops near the Ukrainian border is not such a reason. Bulgaria opposes the deployment of NATO military contingent on its territory, according to the German newspaper Der Spiegel.

The publication refers to the entry made by the Bulgarian Minister of Defense on its own Facebook page. In it, Yanov writes that at the moment there are no prerequisites to justify the deployment of NATO troops in Bulgaria. Thus, he commented on the statement of the Supreme Commander of NATO forces, General Tod Walters, who proposed to deploy the alliance's troops on the territory of Bulgaria and Romania in response to the build-up of the Russian military presence on the border with Ukraine.

(...) at this stage there is no reason to consider these events as a direct threat to NATO and the current security zone

- said Stefan Yanov, adding that such a decision does not meet the interests of Bulgaria, as well as NATO.

The German edition emphasizes that the Bulgarians are historically considered a friendly people to Russia.

And here are the readers of another Bulgarian edition "Diary", which published news on the possible deployment of a NATO military contingent on the territory of the country, were divided. According to one part, fortunately smaller, but rejoicing at such an event, NATO troops will "put in place" Russia, which understands only the "language of force." The majority, however, oppose the deployment of the military alliance on their territory, claiming pretexts made up for this, including the "aggressive" Russia.

Meanwhile, last Friday in Brussels, Prime Minister of Bulgaria E. Petkov said that the country is fully in solidarity with the position of Europe and the defensive alliance in relation to Ukraine, but did not discuss the issue of deploying new forces of the alliance.

Comments

[Aviator_]

Yes, they will post it anyway. And if the Minister of Defense is against, then they will be dismissed.

[Egoza]

Quote: Aviator_

And if the Minister of Defense is against, then they will be dismissed.

What they will regret very much later!

[tralflot1832]

2006 On May 25, the Bulgarian parliament, 150 for 22 against, voted for the deployment of a permanent contingent of the US Armed Forces of 2500 people in very tricky bases. They are called not a base, but a training center. There are three or four of them for all types of military. There is also an additional US may accommodate another 2500 people for up to 90 days. Peace-loving Bulgarians? Hey, where are you?

[DymOk_v_dYmke]

Quote: tralflot1832

deploying a permanent US military contingent of 2500 at very tricky bases, not called a base, but a training center.

They will pass on their experience to foul and flee (like from Avgan).

[pytar]

2006 May 25 The Bulgarian parliament voted 150 in 22 against the deployment of a permanent US military contingent of 2500 in very tricky bases, not called a base, but a training center.

Andrey, 2021 not 2006! Let's see what else interesting happened in the meantime ...
On June 7, 2007, the Russian Federation adopted Federal Law No. 99-FZ "On the Ratification of the Agreement between the States Parties to the North Atlantic Treaty and other States participating in the Partnership for Peace program, on the status of their Forces dated June 19, 1995, and the Supplementary protocol to him ".
And that Additional Protocol to the Agreement was signed by the Russian Federation in the city of Sofia on April 28, the same 2006.!
In the meantime, you worked very actively with NATO, right up to 2008 and even up to 2014. This is a fact.

There are three or four of them for all kinds of military ...

There are 4 training centers, this is essentially a training ground where our servicemen are trained, mainly from the special forces.

Peace-loving Bulgarians, where are you?

Since 1994, in the implementation of international treaties - the CFE Treaty, the Vienna Document and the Open Skies Treaty, The Russian Federation has carried out over 50 inspections of military sites in the territory of Bulgaria. Bulgaria took the Russian military to the Novo Selo training ground and other military objects around Plovdiv, even after the deterioration of relations between NATO and the Russian Federation, as a result of the Ukrainian crisis.
Here is a link with November 24.11.2015, XNUMX
https://pan.bg/view_article-61-325545-ruski-voenni-posetiha-graf-ignatievo-krumovo-bezmer-68-brigada-i-novo-selo-video.html

[tralflot1832]

The presence of the US Armed Forces on your territory is entirely your problem. You took responsibility for this by joining NATO.

[pytar]

The presence of the US Armed Forces on your territory is entirely your problem. You took responsibility for this by joining NATO.

And we will all die, but someone will go to paradise ...

[Pereira]

We will all die. But the planet Earth will not regret the inhabitants of NATO countries.

[pytar]

We will all die.

Are you in a hurry somewhere?

But the planet Earth will not regret the inhabitants of NATO countries.

The earth does not regret anyone. She is a Planet.

[Pereira]

I'm not hurrying. It is NATO that is in a hurry somewhere. But for me there is neither Bulgarian nor Anglo-Saxon. All the planet Earth will accept.

[pytar]

But for me there is neither Bulgarian nor Anglo-Saxon.

For 99,99999999999999999 ~% of humanity, you are Michael, no.

[potterz]

Reading your comments, I came to the conclusion that you seem to be an intelligent person. But some of your comments lead me to the opposite! There is my country, there are my troops! I send them as I want and where I want! In my country. Doesn't matter, from south to east or vice versa! But! When you do this at my borders, it cannot but cause concern! This is common logic !!! Or can I tell you how many kilometers the tan is from our borders !? I rarely write here. But sometimes some of the statements are just infuriating!

[potterz]

* pi. dostan

[pytar]

Reading your comments, I came to the conclusion that you seem to be an intelligent person. But some of your comments lead me to the opposite!

It is strange that you are not bothered by the comments of local members of the forum, whom I answer in their style!

There is my country, there are my troops! I send them as I want and where I want! In my country. Doesn't matter, from south to east or vice versa!

Logically, I do not dispute your right to move troops wherever you want on your own or on allies' territory! And when we change places, think!

But! When you do this at my borders, it cannot but cause concern!

It is clear what worries! But let's first find out what this concept of "my boundaries" covers ??? What lane, what is the distance?

I rarely write here. But sometimes some of the statements are just infuriating!

No need to get mad, you need to put in the place of the oncoming country, see what the situation looks like from there!

[tralflot1832]

Hand over the captive Americans yourself, you can keep the pilots for the restoration of our national economy. Other NATO countries are queuing up to strike with Calibers and Daggers, a preliminary registration is open.

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: tralflot1832

Other NATO countries are queuing up to strike with Calibers and Daggers, a preliminary appointment is open.

They deployed missiles in Romania, telling us that they are against Iran. The same was said about Poland. Now to deploy soldiers in Bulgaria to defend the eastern border of Ukraine? Are they there in Washington? Who are we supposed to be? Who will tell them that we also sometimes look at the globe? And, finally, it's time already at the official level, so that it comes down to it, to explain that, By deploying American troops, the Young NATO members do not ensure their safety, but add to the list of targets for our missiles.

[Grits]

Quote: tralflot1832

Other NATO countries are queuing up to strike with Calibers and Daggers, a preliminary appointment is open.

Something too wide, many began to scatter calibers and daggers. And how many of those Caliber with Daggers were produced at the factories? And their carriers can be counted on one hand. you don't even need toes

[tralflot1832]

For four fleets in 9 years, almost 600 calibers have already been deployed. We are folding KTOF, 400 450 calibers should be enough for Europe, this is the first salvo without reloading. It was considered true with ships that are already undergoing acceptance tests.

[pytar]

Yes, they will post it anyway. And if the Minister of Defense is against, then they will be dismissed.

They will not send. Defense Minister Yanev, on the one hand, sounded for the reaction, on the other, he initiated a public and parliamentary debate on the issue.

[alystan]

Well, there is also the President (from the military) seems to be more or less adequate.
For the first time in many years, they got rid of outright Russophobes and pro-Europeans.
Perhaps they were just the first in the EU to have a point as a safety fuse that worked !?

[Diverter]

the diapers just started to overflow quickly

[Baloo]

Quote: Aviator_

Yes, they will post it anyway. And if the Minister of Defense is against, then they will be dismissed.

Why do Bulgarians need targets on their territory?

[Grits]

Quote: Balu

Why do Bulgarians need targets on their territory?

And who will ask them? They will give them a good kick, they will huddle in a corner and whine about love for "American brothers"

[Region-25.rus]

Bulgaria opposes the deployment of NATO military contingent on its territory,

from an old joke - "The Bulgarian elephant is the best friend of the Soviet (Russian) elephant"

[SKIF555]

This is a ram on a kaurdak. The Turks will be given for cutting.

[carpenter]

According to one half, fortunately smaller, but rejoicing at such an event, NATO troops will "put in place" Russia

And we brothers in 1944 accepted you as our own, and did not even punish you: that you were in the same bundle with Hitler. And it turns out that they just wanted to live, and not be friends.

[pytar]

And we brothers in 1944 accepted you as our own, and did not even punish you: that you were in the same bundle with Hitler.

It was not so Dimon, it was not so at all ... You just need to order chronologically the facts and understand the cause-and-effect relationship between them. Accordingly, who is to blame!
When we signed the pact, you had a non-aggression pact and delimitation of spheres of influence with Germany for 2 years! The USSR pursued political and economic cooperation with the Axis countries in its own interests. Moreover, according to Chl. 5 of the accession agreement, each Axis member country had the right to conduct relations with the USSR at its own discretion. When Germany and its allies attacked the USSR, Bulgaria did not participate. We maintained quite normal diplomatic relations with the USSR until 05.09.1944/XNUMX/XNUMX.

At the same time, a communist partisan movement emerged in the country:


And since September Bulgaria took part in the war against Germany with 3 armies and half a million soldiers.

The Bulgarian army fought well, the commander-in-chief of the 2BNA Gen. Vl. Stoichev took part in the Victory Parade.

[Dart]

As they say here in Russia - "It's too late to drink Borjomi if the kidneys have failed ..."
Some things cannot be "rolled back".

[Pereira]

But we know their value.

[tralflot1832]

The German press about the deployment of NATO troops in Bulgaria? Nonsense for the EU voter. The official Sofia is considering the deployment of additional NATO forces on its territory. The whole concert is over.

[carpenter]

Quote: tralflot1832

The whole concert is over.

Ended up. Enough.

[K-50]

German press: Bulgaria opposes the deployment of NATO military contingent on its territory

Well, except that Bulgaria itself is a member of Nat.
Maybe it finally dawned on the "brothers" that where the troops of Nata were stationed, then a very big badabum is possible there, if the leadership completely loses its sense of reality and wants to test Russia for its strength.

[Mikhail m]

Bulgaria opposes the deployment of NATO military contingent on its territory

The Minister of Defense, of course, is a serious person, but the final decision is not made by him, unfortunately. So the deployment of NATO troops in Bulgaria is only a matter of time. Well, the fact that "the Bulgarians are historically considered a friendly people of Russia" in no way prevents them from putting a spoke in their wheels, or even directly opposing Russia. The legend of the little brothers absolutely does not stand up to criticism.

[Thrifty]

And what, the State Department and the Pantygon just stretched out into a frunt, and handed over to the decision of the people, and part of the authorities of Bulgaria, not to host NATO in their country ???

[businessv]

at this stage, there is no reason to consider these events as a direct threat to NATO and the current security zone

Well done Yanev, it is clear that he is already a middle-aged person (born in 1960), hence the prudence and competent assessment of the situation.

[Ros 56]

Although the Bulgarians are still brothers, they are not crazy and want to live, and not turn into a target for Caliber and Iskander with all that it implies.

[tralflot1832]

Do not flatter the Bulgarians, there are goals for the Calibers right now, 2500 Americans are stationed on a permanent basis not in bases, but in training centers.

[carpenter]

Quote: Ros 56

Although Bulgarians are still brothers, they are not crazy and want to live, and not turn into a target for Caliber and Iskander

I do not know ...............?

[agoran]

Well, posted further, what?
Rockets from Crimea will multiply by zero, plus the local population.
Think Bulgarians.

[tralflot1832]

Enough to throw caliber, not enough for England.

[Ros 56]

Enough even for this shaggy eccentric.

[tralflot1832]

We will take this shaggy man alive, I will have his hair cut! (Not my quote)

[ugol2]

Bulgarians, as always, on two chairs.

[Incvizitor]

on its territory

Does it have its own territory? Have you given everything to fascington?

[shtatsov]

Quote: tralflot1832

Enough to throw caliber, not enough for England.

Politically reasoning!

[Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov]

The German edition emphasizes that the Bulgarians are historically considered a friendly people of Russia.

***
"... According to my inner conviction, the most complete and irresistible - Russia will not, and never have had, such haters, envious people, slanderers and even obvious enemies, like all these Slavic tribes, as soon as Russia liberates them, and Europe will agree to recognize them as freed!
---
After liberation, they will begin their new life, I repeat, precisely by asking for themselves from Europe, England and Germany, for example, a guarantee and protection of their freedom, and even though Russia will be included in the concert of the European powers, but they are in protection from Russia and will do it ... "
---
F.M. Dostoevsky
***

[pytar]

"... According to my inner conviction, the most complete and irresistible - Russia will not, and never have had, such haters, envious people, slanderers and even obvious enemies, like all these Slavic tribes, as soon as Russia liberates them, and Europe will agree to recognize them as liberated! After liberation, they will begin their new life ...F.M. Dostoevsky

Yes, these Slavic tribes are somehow wrong! Consider most of them! "We freed them, and they, insolent people, want to live free, according to their charter, not according to ours! Somehow they misunderstand Freedom! They are completely insolent!"

[fiv]

Allowing foreign military personnel to come to you and letting them build bases is like growing (deliberately!) A malignant tumor on your own. And that's all - then she lives by her own laws! And you, the time will come, will live and die according to its laws. What do you need to have in mind to voluntarily agree to such a thing?

[pytar]

Russia has bases on the territory of its allies. And it allows foreign troops on its territory, even signed such an agreement with NATO. In Bulgaria, we are not talking about the creation of full-fledged bases. Exercises are being held, even Serbia took part in our work, so did the Bulgarians. the army is participating in exercises in neighboring countries. There is nothing extraordinary.

[fiv]

Dear Pytar! If you yourself do not understand, then it is impossible to explain to you. At least I don’t undertake this.

[pytar]

Dear Pytar! If you yourself do not understand, then it is impossible to explain to you. At least I don’t undertake this.

Dear Igor! If you do not try to look at the situation with the counter country, you will never understand what is at stake. I tried to encourage you to do such an experiment, obviously failed ...

[Reserve buildbat]

"The German edition emphasizes that the Bulgarians are historically considered a friendly people of Russia."
They are considered. And they especially clearly show their friendliness in world wars. They happily rush to Russia, and as soon as Russia hits the Mordas with the "European Union", which invariably includes Bulgaria, they immediately repaint, rush to gnaw at their yesterday's masters.

[Artemion3]

Well, at least so, and thanks for that.