Chinese Foreign Ministry: NATO must abandon the Cold War mentality

It is time for NATO to abandon the Cold War mentality. The Alliance should stop being guided by ideological dogmas in the interests of global stability.

This opinion was expressed by the PRC Foreign Ministry.

As the largest military alliance in the world, NATO must abandon the Cold War mentality and ideological prejudices

- said the Chinese Foreign Ministry.

Beijing believes that NATO should make more efforts to strengthen security both regionally and globally.

These statements by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs are the reaction of official Beijing to the latest initiative of the Kremlin regarding guarantees of international security. It is an appeal by the Russian Foreign Ministry to the White House and the North Atlantic Alliance, which contains draft agreements between the Russian leadership and the aforementioned Western structures.

Russia proposed to the West to stop considering it as a potential enemy, to stop whipping up military hysteria and to give written guarantees of refusal from further expansion of the North Atlantic Alliance to the east. Moscow also advocates that NATO troops be deployed only on the territory of those states where they were located as of 1997, without advancing the army into the countries that joined the bloc after 1997.

In China, they believe that the policy of confrontation in the modern world is an outright relic of the past, on which, nevertheless, the United States and its individual allies are trying to stake.

Comments

[The leader of the Redskins]

Blah was about nothing. However, like most of the statements in the openly ossified structure that the UN has become. So, for show.

[The leader of the Redskins]

I'm sorry. For some reason I thought that this statement was made at the UN.
Probably due to the fact that I read news on other sites in parallel.
Once again I apologize.

[Tatyana]

Quote: askort154

A strange thing is happening on the site, I clicked on the +, two "-" popped up.
And this is not the first time. Interestingly, is it just me?

This is because from the time when you opened the page of the article on the site "VO" and while you yourself read it, some time has passed. During this time, other participants managed to put their pluses and minuses to this comment.
As a result, when you put your "+" or "-", then in the change it was reflected with other "++" or "- -" to this comment in real time.
This means that during the cut off period of time, together with you, one of the participants also put their "-" to this comment, if you also put "-", or your own "+", if you also put your "+".
It doesn't matter if "-" is meant or "++". This is how a computer program works. And this has nothing to do with the warnings of moderators and administrators to site members.

I go to the admins in the "mansions" - 5 warnings from one on the site. They have increased "love" for me.

You also don't need to worry about the allegedly possible discrimination against you personally - because everything for absolutely everyone happens the same according to the RULES of the site.
After 1 calendar year, old warnings to site members are periodically removed one by one.
For example Now you have 5 warnings. Then there will be 4, then 3, etc., if you stop typing New alerts.

[askort154]

Tatyana if you stop typing New alerts.

Thanks Tatyana ! All clear.
And about the "warnings" I have already figured out more than once,
they are sometimes not objective. Obscene words and expressions are crammed into the "control". So for example - folk
the nickname of the Ukrainians is punished with a warning.
I had an interesting case. In the news article there was a word - the name of a female dog. In my commentary, I made a reference to this proposal without intentionally reprinting it. For this I was given a "warning". After the trial, the editor on duty agreed with me, but did not remove the warning. And the subsequent ones were not for "obscene words",
but for the wrong, in the opinion of the editor on duty,
vision and statement of comment. Years go by, but the "warnings" are not removed. And the real reason is known to me, but it cannot be voiced here, on the VO website. These warnings are even fun for me. Thanks again for the clarification!

[Tatyana]

Obscene words and similar common names in relation to people of different nationalities, even if they are simply implied in a picture reprinted from the Internet, are also punished with a warning.
In addition, the editor reserves the right to remove a member's comment altogether without any warnings and explanations, if this comment is not in the topic of the article or does not comply with the policy of the site's editorial board.
The participants must respectfully accept this, since the site itself is their business project and they are responsible for it to Roskomnadzor. Fines in business are not desirable for anyone.

Quote askort154
After the trial, the editor on duty agreed with me, but did not remove the warning

The very warning of the moderators - and it is only on the complaint of a site member - can only be removed by admins, Moreover, if the participant's complaint occurred on time - i.e. if no more than 1 hectare has passed since the receipt of a warning and a complaint about it. And for a guarantee, only a few hours and preferably with a deadline no later than midnight.

[sgapich]

Quote: Tatiana

... After 1 calendar year, old warnings to site members are periodically removed one by one ...

Looks like the site administration has some strange scheme for "removing" warnings. Because I have one hanging, but since September 2017.

[Tatyana]

I also have 3 warnings and 1 ban for 2020.
You just need to contact the admins after the New Year.
They periodically remove after a year of warnings for our voluntary or involuntary violations of the RULES of the site.
If they hadn't filmed me, as a site member for 6 years, I would not have been on the site for a long time. Knowing how up to 7 warnings ea year reached.

[Reserve buildbat]

I have 7 warnings.
Once it was 5 - filmed normally. Now 7 are holding for more than a year. Don't care

[Denis812]

Who cares how many of these warnings?
I have here 4. So what?
I am banned from Censor.net every one to two weeks. The Correspondent has the same thing.
On here.by they were banned once a month for three years in a row.
Here, warnings are posted once a month.
Well, they'll ban me here, and what's wrong? :)))) I was banned twice in Fido. :)))

[Vladimir61]

Quote: Leader of the Redskins

However, like most of the statements in the openly ossified structure that the UN has become.

NATO has been and remains a US project. Without the US, there is no NATO. They will now take advantage of this, shifting all responsibility for the confrontation with Russia onto European countries. Moreover, even if there are moderate authorities in the leading EU countries, they have their own "tobacco" there, in the person of Poland and the Tribalts. And they themselves can now talk about anything, even about the desire to reduce tension.

[carpenter]

In China, they believe that the policy of confrontation in the modern world is an outright relic of the past, on which, nevertheless, the United States and its individual allies are trying to stake.

In today's world, it's time to end the "Texas Cowboys" policy and gunboat intimidation.

[prior]

The Cold War is the one that was under the USSR.
Now it is a "cold carnage".
Then there were at least some concepts, now - a complete chaos.
Europe and America are no longer impressed by the Japanese Hiroshima, they apparently need their own ...

[askort154]

Chinese Foreign Ministry: NATO must abandon the Cold War mentality

This is a shaking of air. It's time for Russia and China to "spin the topic" - NATO is the most aggressive military structure in the world. And raise this topic at all international forums, and in the Media - 25 hours a day, listing all the countries that NATO destroyed. We must use the information war to the fullest, constantly poke their noses into their own shit, and not flirt with them in "partnership".

[Secutor]

And what will it give? Be the CSTO the strongest military alliance of the richest countries and someone was indignant "Let's close it!" Russia would laugh in the face of such countries.

[Mountain shooter]

The news is about nothing. Leopold's cats. Guys let's be friends! And the mice continue ...

[barclay]

These statements by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs are the reaction of official Beijing to the latest initiative of the Kremlin regarding guarantees of international security.
I think not quite so. The Chinese comrades support our voice with their statement. And that's not bad. It is not very often in the international arena that one can hear such support addressed to us. Plus, the latest videoconference between GDP and Xi creates a certain pressure overseas.

[APASUS]

Didn't they understand anything in Beijing? NATO is a tool for maintaining US hegemony, not a detachment of peacekeepers. It cannot be peaceful a priori

[mojohed2012]

Nobody will give up anything. And NATO, as it was a dummy without the United States, remains so. And their general secretaries, as they were loud, lying talking heads, remain so.

[ugol2]

This means that China is on the side of Russia in this matter.

[sen]

Russia proposed to the West to stop considering it as a potential enemy, to stop whipping up military hysteria and to give written guarantees of refusal from further expansion of the North Atlantic Alliance to the east. Moscow also advocates that NATO troops be deployed only on the territory of those states where they were located as of 1997, without advancing the army into the countries that joined the bloc after 1997.

Yes, the situation is tense. Ours are seriously preparing for confrontation. It is no coincidence that the Ministry of Emergencies has developed a new GOST for the urgent burial of the bodies of dead people and animals during war and during an emergency in peacetime.
https://iz.ru/1267192/2021-12-21/v-mchs-razrabotali-gost-po-organizatcii-bratskikh-mogil

[amr]

Quote: askort154

but for the wrong, in the opinion of the editor on duty,
vision and statement of comment. Years go by, but the "warnings" are not removed. And the real reason is known to me, but it cannot be voiced here, on the VO website

... I’m the same story))) but NATO expanding to the east is to blame for everything!))

[Vladimir Mashkov]

The Chinese are great! Support!

[Pavel57]

NATO is one of the elements of the structure of supporting the dollar as the world currency. The dollar leaves this role, the corresponding org disappears. structures that become too expensive to maintain.