A few words about the idols of modern youth
When politicians and political scientists talk about the stage and the so-called modern stars, the question arises: why all of a sudden? The options are different, but one way or another they all relate to what is generally happening in the world of show business and how expensive this business is, leading the notorious masses.
On the one hand, young people are dear to us everywhere; stage, cinema, television need "new blood", new names. But for some reason, more and more often these very new names bring in outright vulgarity, rudeness, ignorance. They say what we are, such is the culture. They say that if there is demand, then there will be supply.
It turns out that it is we, our society, who ourselves demand masculine girls or pomaded like guys with a vague orientation? Or is it not quite so? Or not at all? Or earlier, when Tsoi, Kinchev, Vysotsky, Voznesensky, it was completely different.
You can talk about retrograde, about what at one time and Mozart was perceived as an upstart. But when in prime time you switch between several federal channels, then for some reason it is more and more likely to stumble upon something that looks oh-oh-oh, but at the same time this oh-oh-oh is frankly promoted as a role model for modern youth. Is this a reason to think about what our youth will eventually become, if the example to follow is degeneration, total inadequacy, ignorance and antics? Certainly a reason. But how to get out of this situation? Or give complete freedom, and expect that the grains from the chaff will separate by themselves?
A plot on the topic from Alexey Pushkov on his YouTube channel:
- https://vk.com/danya_milokhinreal
Information