Military Review

British press: Russia is putting into service a missile capable of destroying Great Britain

115

Russia's plans to deploy the new Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile have seriously frightened the British. London has already said that one of the latest Russian missiles, carrying 12 nuclear warheads, could completely destroy the UK. Writes about this the author of an article for the British edition of The Sun.


Russia is preparing a new Sarmat intercontinental missile capable of carrying 12 nuclear warheads to be put on alert. According to the author, who called the "Sarmat" a hypersonic missile capable of reaching speeds of 25570 km per hour, one ICBM launched is capable of destroying the whole of Great Britain.

Will Stewart, relying on the publications of the Russian media, writes that next year Russia will unprecedentedly increase the number of test launches of missiles with nuclear warheads, fearing the outbreak of World War III amid tensions with Ukraine. In addition, the commander of the Strategic Missile Forces, Colonel-General Karakaev, promised to replace the planning hypersonic unit "Avangard" with a more powerful weapon... All this is happening against the backdrop of a concentration of 100 Russian servicemen on the Ukrainian borders.

Regarding the new Sarmat ICBM, the author reports that from 2022 Russia will begin a gradual decommissioning of the Voevoda missile system, replacing it with the Sarmat ICBM capable of delivering 10 to 15 warheads anywhere in the world. At the same time, the rocket is capable of maneuvering in the upper atmosphere along an unpredictable trajectory, which makes it 100% invulnerable to all existing and prospective anti-aircraft systems.

As part of the rocket preparation, Russia will conduct up to 10 test launches during the year, compared with 25 launches in the previous 5 years. This indicates the importance Moscow attaches to the introduction of a new missile into service, he sums up.
115 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Siberian-1
    Siberian-1 20 December 2021 13: 01
    +41
    Yes something like that. We are not threatening. we will simply destroy this mold if it attacks us at least once.
    1. Aerodrome
      Aerodrome 20 December 2021 13: 11
      +1
      British press: Russia is putting into service a missile capable of destroying Great Britain
      do not rush to bury yourself ... have not accepted yet. and without it we could, but we cannot ... children ...
      1. Sidor Amenpodestovich
        Sidor Amenpodestovich 20 December 2021 13: 46
        +2
        Quote: Aerodrome
        children ...

        1. krot
          krot 20 December 2021 14: 34
          +9
          Yes something like that. We are not threatening. we will simply destroy this mold if it attacks us at least once.

          They chose a very accurate word for the Anglo-Saxons, they usually called them parasites on the body of the earth, but parasites are too flattering for them! They are mold!
          1. 2112vda
            2112vda 21 December 2021 18: 20
            +1
            No need to hurt the mold. There are also useful types of this mushroom. A more precise definition of this impudent Saxon substance is LYARVA. Lyarva, a predatory infernal entity of a gelatinous consistency. This will be more accurate.
          2. avg
            avg 22 December 2021 11: 47
            0
            That is, they thought they couldn't before? Then you need to reassure the small-haired people, explain that no one will spend "Sarmat" on them. yes
      2. Xnumx vis
        Xnumx vis 20 December 2021 15: 42
        +1
        Quote: Aerodrome
        . have not accepted yet. and without it we could, but we cannot ... children ...

        Huh! So, what are your children there? Chi sho? From the same annoyance !!! But seriously, now our compatriots live in all developed countries of the world. They work, study, just live. Why not ? At the right time, they will designate the desired goals.
    2. Nikolay Ivanov_5
      Nikolay Ivanov_5 20 December 2021 13: 34
      +23
      Britain has always been a covert and overt enemy of Russia, even when it was part of a coalition against a common enemy (examples are the First and Second World Wars).
      1. fruc
        fruc 20 December 2021 13: 55
        +6
        You should also carefully study who and whose agents of influence within the Russian Federation, I mean the banking sector, trade and industry.
        1. Charik
          Charik 20 December 2021 23: 11
          +1
          and on TV
      2. zenion
        zenion 22 December 2021 13: 11
        -1
        Nikolay Ivanov_5. Why are all gifts to Britain? Other countries also deserve a couple of these gifts. And there is a country for which hundreds of different gifts are not a pity from a Russian person. There is a beautiful Yellowstone reserve there, which could arrange fireworks for a week, or a month. For good millionaires, billionaires, everything needs to shine and shine with different lights. Beauty.
  2. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 20 December 2021 13: 07
    +23
    And Satan, I like this name better, couldn’t it before. Or should our new device called Sarmat be promoted on the media field?
    1. KCA
      KCA 20 December 2021 14: 40
      +10
      They themselves will come up with a name, according to our P-36M "Voyevoda", this is according to the NATO classification SS-18 Satan
      1. tralflot1832
        tralflot1832 20 December 2021 15: 09
        +4
        For a joke, to a friend in his RMU, this is not a missile mine launcher, below the RMU inscription, on the clinket door, I wrote SS 18 Satan. A friend liked the pompalit too. RMU for fishing, this is a Fishmeal plant.
  3. Alexander Ivanov_11
    Alexander Ivanov_11 20 December 2021 13: 08
    +6
    Eco is shaving you.
  4. prior
    prior 20 December 2021 13: 08
    +13
    Russia is adding a missile capable of destroying Britain

    And he does the right thing. An Englishwoman, who in relation to Russia only knows that she is crap, it is high time to destroy.
    Confused by her. The only thing he can do is hide the stolen money in banks.
    1. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 20 December 2021 13: 19
      0
      Quote: prior
      Confused by her.

      But what about our rich? To touch them nizzya!
      1. prior
        prior 20 December 2021 13: 39
        +11
        This is why we will touch them ... wink
        1. Uncle lee
          Uncle lee 20 December 2021 13: 57
          +2
          Quote: prior
          and touch ..

          And I thought, Voronezh again ... lol
      2. Grits
        Grits 20 December 2021 17: 03
        +1
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        But what about our rich? To touch them nizzya!

        And grandfather Gorbachev also lives there ... crying
        1. Akuzenka
          Akuzenka 21 December 2021 16: 06
          +2
          And grandfather Gorbachev also lives there ...
          Let him live. I hope that he, too, will be stripped to the skin and dies in a ditch. Or help die, its masters, the British. Berezovsky was helped.
      3. Akuzenka
        Akuzenka 21 December 2021 15: 47
        -1
        But what about our rich? To touch them nizzya!
        Do not worry. Not touched. Neither our exploiters nor their children. If anything, the British themselves will quickly take hostage and the Russian Federation itself will sell the parent to the British. And the rocket ... you need to scare the competing capitalists with something, and they must shout louder about the Bolshevik, oh, Russian (?) Threat.
        1. Uncle lee
          Uncle lee 21 December 2021 16: 00
          0
          Quote: AKuzenka
          Not touched.

          And there will be no conflict!
          1. Akuzenka
            Akuzenka 21 December 2021 16: 04
            0
            Of course it won't. I think that the bargaining has been going on for a long time, on what conditions the Russian Federation will be sold, the price has not yet agreed. They don't want to remember the lessons of history, a deal with the Anglo-Saxons is a deal with the devil. They NEVER fulfill their obligations, ANYTHING. And if they do, then they have a bomb under their ass with a burning fuse and they simply have nowhere to go.
            1. Uncle lee
              Uncle lee 21 December 2021 16: 10
              0
              Quote: AKuzenka
              deal with the devil

              Our little demons are trying to stand on one foot with their main devil ... They will be shod to the fullest and their houses in London will be taken over, money is the same ...
    2. isv000
      isv000 20 December 2021 14: 44
      +5
      They should answer us for Sevastopol! angry And for refusing to help Nicholas II with his family. Their death is in their hands! .. negative
      1. Alexander Seklitsky
        Alexander Seklitsky 20 December 2021 15: 32
        +1
        And nikolashka has to do with it? Their time has passed. I started the country, lost my head. And what kind of help are we talking about? Did the English women have to organize a punitive campaign to get him out of Omsk?
        1. isv000
          isv000 20 December 2021 21: 05
          0
          Quote: Alexander Seklitsky
          And nikolashka has to do with it? Their time has passed. I started the country, lost my head. And what kind of help are we talking about? Did the English women have to organize a punitive campaign to get him out of Omsk?

          Nikolai asked his brother Georg for asylum, and in response - silence ...
          1. Alexander Seklitsky
            Alexander Seklitsky 21 December 2021 06: 55
            -1
            That's right. And why does he need such a freeloader. Give him food, drink and give him a mansion somewhere else. He abdicated the throne himself. It would not even have been possible to use it later as a pretext for a campaign against the Bolsheviks. Some solid cons. And so over there, as Dmitry says, he also got hold of a little gold from his brother. laughing
        2. Nyrobsky
          Nyrobsky 20 December 2021 21: 36
          +3
          Quote: Alexander Seklitsky
          And nikolashka has to do with it? Their time has passed. I started the country, lost my head. And what kind of help are we talking about? Did the English women have to organize a punitive campaign to get him out of Omsk?

          Nikolasha kept a lot of gold there - there is no tsar with heirs, there is no owner of the gold, and therefore, everything according to its relatives migrated under the Anglican crown. They were with King George V, there were tea cousins, and mothers were their sisters.
          1. Alexander Seklitsky
            Alexander Seklitsky 21 December 2021 06: 47
            0
            aaa so that's where, the ineradicable desire of our elite, to stash the stolen goods in England. laughing It turns out that someone else has trodden the path.
            1. Nyrobsky
              Nyrobsky 21 December 2021 11: 19
              +5
              Quote: Alexander Seklitsky
              so that's where the ineradicable desire of our elite comes from, to stash the stolen goods in England
              Yeah. Only one thing they did not know, the king was ordered by a relative and robbed, and even these rootless, they will pluck at the opportunity like chickens, and then strangle them. From Birch there was only a cross that was baked by English crows.
  5. Flooding
    Flooding 20 December 2021 13: 09
    +5
    Yes, there is reason to think about whether it is worth fanning the militant Russophobic hysteria.
    1. zwlad
      zwlad 20 December 2021 13: 22
      +3
      Of course worth it!
      For this, they say, it is not bad to pay from overseas.
  6. Finches
    Finches 20 December 2021 13: 09
    +8
    So sit on your island quietly, quietly! And you shouldn't care what we do with Ukraine, just as we don't care much about what you did with the Falklands!
    1. Aerodrome
      Aerodrome 20 December 2021 13: 16
      -1
      naivety ... it is, of course, easier to live ... and believe in honor, and serve truthfully, what an honor ... to serve anyone ...
    2. isv000
      isv000 20 December 2021 14: 46
      +3
      Quote: Finches
      So sit on your island quietly, quietly! And you shouldn't care what we do with Ukraine

      Sooner or later, Ukraine will ask for forgiveness from Mother, but only Old Man can flog ... yes
  7. 23424636
    23424636 20 December 2021 13: 11
    +4
    England lives only because the nouveau riche thieves, mostly of Jewish nationality, teach their children there and take the loot stolen in Russia there. Even VVP's friend, Bukharian Jew Iskander Makhmudov, the owner of Transmashholding with a 20% blocking French stake has been living in England for a long time. Well, who will bring down this vile country?
  8. andr327
    andr327 20 December 2021 13: 12
    +13
    How much panic with absolute ignorance and ignorance of the forces and means of the Strategic Missile Forces. Launches of missiles with nuclear warheads, misunderstanding of what the carrier and combat equipment are. Will Stewart continue your activities in the same spirit and then 70 percent of the British will rush into the English Channel only from the word Russia.
  9. Opiuk
    Opiuk 20 December 2021 13: 14
    -1
    Well, what is the whole of Great Britain? 8 megatons maximum power, this is enough for a shock wave, well, 10-15 km, if not less, of course, taking into account the destruction of objects and other things, the consequences will become even more sad, but not so much that the whole country will receive cranks from one Sarmatian.
  10. Cat Alexandrovich
    Cat Alexandrovich 20 December 2021 13: 15
    +10
    Of all that the Britashka drew in the note, I especially liked this piece:
    "Next year, Russia will unprecedentedly increase the number of test launches of missiles with nuclear warheads." laughing
    And this year, how many such launches were there, and last? And, most importantly, where did all these nuclear warheads end up fall?
    1. Dude
      Dude 20 December 2021 13: 55
      +6
      Quote: Cat Alexandrovich
      Of all that the Britashka drew in the note, I especially liked this piece:
      "Next year, Russia will unprecedentedly increase the number of test launches of missiles with nuclear warheads." laughing
      And this year, how many such launches were there, and last? And, most importantly, where did all these nuclear warheads end up fall?

      They didn't fall, they still fly. Inside the skull of mr. Stewart laughing
      Yes, white-white, savsem is hot! ©
  11. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 20 December 2021 13: 17
    +15
    This is called a swap in passing. The main enemy is the United States, and the main blow to them, and the small British mongrel - so, one deviated ... wassat This is all irony, but when you start poking the bear with a stick, think if it is long enough ...
  12. zwlad
    zwlad 20 December 2021 13: 20
    +11
    Naive journalist.
    Those missiles that are now on alert are also guaranteed to destroy Great Britain.
  13. TatarinSSSR
    TatarinSSSR 20 December 2021 13: 21
    +7
    Well, the fear of the British as a new reason for new sanctions against Russia. Now Russia is threatening Great Britain with aggression! Nikazat!
  14. Incvizitor
    Incvizitor 20 December 2021 13: 23
    0
    It is a lot of honor for small-scale small-britain 12 blocks, a couple of YARs will be enough there, or even five poplars.
  15. Vladimir 290
    Vladimir 290 20 December 2021 13: 34
    +4
    And that, they naively believed that nothing would reach Britain and the warheads on the Voevoda were weaker.
  16. K-50
    K-50 20 December 2021 13: 34
    +8
    British press: Russia is putting into service a missile capable of destroying Great Britain

    Are you just now awake? belay
    Yes, you are brakes, cleaner than Estonians. fellow lol
    Such rockets have been around since the 60s. The stranger is that you behave like immortal MacLeods. lol
  17. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 20 December 2021 13: 35
    0
    A free quiz is announced who will list worthy targets for the Sarmat warheads. The cities where you were cheated, they didn’t fill up in the bar. to bring down the bridge with ordinary gauges. True, from England it is not sickly to fly.
    1. isv000
      isv000 20 December 2021 14: 53
      +3
      Quote: tralflot1832
      A free quiz is announced who will list worthy targets for the Sarmat warheads. The cities where you were cheated, they didn’t fill up in the bar. to bring down the bridge with ordinary gauges. True, from England it is not sickly to fly.

      In Peterhead, you can arrange a good fireworks. And if something is launched from there, then by the time the attack is repelled, cliffs and reefs will remain from the island. There are enough nuclear submarines in the Atlantic ...
  18. mvg
    mvg 20 December 2021 13: 36
    -4
    Those. not stupid people write an article about "vigorous war", they prove something there .. but most of the urya-patriots IN such articles do not read. And everything is trying to throw "hats", preferably pink
    1. fruc
      fruc 20 December 2021 14: 06
      0
      mvg: non-stupid people write an article about "vigorous war"

      But they don't write here, or are we stupid. It is good that the harsh reality is still being felt in Great Britain.
    2. tralflot1832
      tralflot1832 20 December 2021 15: 03
      +1
      Why in the UK they don't write what they have to answer. For everyone in Europe they are white and fluffy and farts only with butterflies. But for us they don't, let the UK sit down at the negotiating table, but they don't want to. But they have to.
    3. Sergey Kulikov_3
      Sergey Kulikov_3 20 December 2021 21: 29
      0
      mvg (Maxim) We are more afraid of marginal traitors, and enemies are not so terrible.
  19. askort154
    askort154 20 December 2021 13: 39
    +5
    ...... one ICBM launched is capable of destroying the whole of Great Britain.

    Not "Great Britain", but England on the islets. So enough puffing up, playing the role of the godfather's wife, continue to "gender", you do it better.
    It is also economical - no need to build two separate toilets.
  20. 22 dmdc
    22 dmdc 20 December 2021 13: 40
    +2
    America doesn't love us, England doesn't love us, Germany doesn't love us for many centuries in a row. S. Slepakov.
    1. AlexVas44
      AlexVas44 20 December 2021 13: 48
      +2
      Quote: 22 dmdc
      America does not love us, England does not love us, Germany does not love us for many centuries in a row

      Enough for everyone, the main thing is to remember that the answer will be ...
    2. isv000
      isv000 20 December 2021 14: 55
      +2
      Quote: 22 dmdc
      America doesn't love us, England doesn't love us, Germany doesn't love us for many centuries in a row. S. Slepakov.

      You don't need to love us, it's enough just not to crap.
  21. Rostock
    Rostock 20 December 2021 14: 00
    +1
    It is high time for non-Great Britain to be recognized as an aggressor state as a minimum. And in the case of World 3, on a par with the United States, this is the number one goal.
  22. rocket757
    rocket757 20 December 2021 14: 04
    0
    As part of the rocket preparation, Russia will conduct up to 10 test launches during the year, compared with 25 launches in the previous 5 years. This indicates the importance Moscow attaches to the introduction of a new missile into service, he sums up.
    ... In general, it is not in vain that they are worried, or even sad ...
    But they dragged it to the extreme completely in vain, this will not be a reason, for anything radical, for anyone ...
  23. expert
    expert 20 December 2021 14: 09
    -2
    To you, dear "partners", Nikita Sergeevich Khrushchev showed his "kuzka's mother" several times, and you just saw her!
  24. rusich
    rusich 20 December 2021 14: 09
    0
    It's high time to get a good fuck about the naglo-Saxons. They have always been against Russia
    1. isv000
      isv000 20 December 2021 14: 56
      +3
      Quote: rusich
      It's high time to get a good fuck about the naglo-Saxons. They have always been against Russia

      Bang. We will definitely bang. But then...
  25. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 20 December 2021 14: 18
    -2
    What good is it that the British are so scared?
    They put pressure on Parliament, and they will say:
    "Let's make the same rocket!"
    No international law prohibits them from making their own ICBMs.
    They will master it technologically, and America will help make warheads.
    And it will be: Russia has a Sarmat and England has its own Sarmat. Both countries are afraid.
    Who did win?
    1. isv000
      isv000 20 December 2021 14: 57
      +2
      Quote: voyaka uh
      And it will be: Russia has a Sarmat and England has its own Sarmat. Both countries are afraid.
      Who did win?

      Nuclear submarine in the Atlantic ... bully
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 20 December 2021 19: 31
      -1
      Let's make the same missile! "They will make it for 20 years - they have neither experience nor production for this. The United States is stuck with a new ICBM - the only thing they can develop is missile defense systems.
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 20 December 2021 19: 56
        0
        "there is no US here with a new ICBM stalled" ///
        ---
        What kind of fictional world do you live in ...
        Missile defense systems on order harder than an ICBM.
        It's just that ICBMs are Russia's only trump card.
        All the efforts of the state are invested in it.
    3. Charik
      Charik 20 December 2021 23: 28
      +1
      of course Jews laughing
    4. Roman_vh
      Roman_vh 20 December 2021 23: 30
      +3
      Israel knows.
  26. Castro Ruiz
    Castro Ruiz 20 December 2021 14: 29
    +2
    And Satan can't send them to hell?
    I think no problem, it is unnecessary to wait for Sarmat. :)
    Englishwoman crap.
  27. Siberian-1
    Siberian-1 20 December 2021 14: 31
    +4
    Quote: tralflot1832
    And Satan, I like this name better, couldn’t it before. Or should our new device called Sarmat be promoted on the media field?

    We didn't call it Satan. Our partners have taken care. And Sarmat is ours, dear ...

    .Scythians
    Poem by Alexander Blok

    Zillions - you. We - the darkness and darkness and darkness.
    Try, fight with us!
    Yes, we are Scythians! Yes, Asians - we,
    With slanted and greedy eyes!

    For you - centuries, for us - a single hour.
    We are like obedient slaves
    Holding a shield between two hostile races
    Mongols and Europe!

    Century, century your old horn forged
    And drowned out thunder, avalanches,
    And a wild fairy tale was a failure for you
    And Lisbon, and Messina!

    You looked east for hundreds of years
    Digging and melting our pearls
    And you, mocking, counted only the term,
    When to train cannon vents!

    Here - the time has come. Wings are beating trouble
    And every day resentment multiplies,
    And the day will come - there will be no trace
    From your Paestums, maybe!

    Oh, the old world! Until you perish,
    While you languish with sweet flour,
    Stop, wise as Oedipus,
    Before the Sphinx with an ancient mystery!

    Russia - Sphinx. Rejoicing and mourning
    And bleeding black blood,
    She looks, looks, looks at you.
    And with hatred, and with love! ...

    Yes, to love as much as our blood loves,
    None of you have loved for a long time!
    Forgot you, that in the world there is love,
    Which burns and kills!

    We love everything - and the heat of cold numbers,
    And the gift of divine visions,
    Everything is clear to us - and a sharp Gallic meaning,
    And the gloomy German genius ...

    We remember everything - hell streets of Paris,
    And the Venetian coolness,
    Lemon groves are a distant fragrance,
    And Cologne smoky bulks ...

    We love flesh - and its taste, and color,
    And the stuffy, mortal flesh smell ...
    Guilty if we crack your skeleton
    In the heavy, gentle paws?

    We used to get used to the bridle
    Playing horses zealous,
    Breaking horses with heavy sacra
    And pacify the slaves of the obstinate ...

    Come to us! From the horrors of war
    Come in peace hugs!
    Before it's too late - the old sword in the sheath,
    Comrades! We will become - brothers!

    And if not - we have nothing to lose,
    And we are not above treachery!
    Century, centuries you will be curse
    Sick later offspring!

    We are wide in the wilds and forests
    Before Europe, prigozhey
    Let's part! We will turn to you
    His Asian mug!

    Go all, go to the Urals!
    We clear the place of battle
    Steel machines, where the integral breathes,
    With the Mongolian wild horde!

    But we ourselves are no longer a shield to you,
    From now on, we will not enter the battle ourselves,
    We'll see how the mortal battle is boiling,
    With his narrow eyes.

    We will not move when the ferocious Hun
    In the pockets of corpses will fumble,
    Burn the city, and drive the herd into the church,
    And fry white brothers meat! ...

    For the last time - come to your senses, old world!
    On the fraternal feast of work and peace,
    The last time for a bright fraternal feast
    Cries the barbaric lyre!
  28. Siberian-1
    Siberian-1 20 December 2021 14: 44
    +1
    Quote: voyaka uh
    What good is it that the British are so scared?
    They put pressure on Parliament, and they will say:
    "Let's make the same rocket!"
    No international law prohibits them from making their own ICBMs.
    They will master it technologically, and America will help make warheads.
    And it will be: Russia has a Sarmat and England has its own Sarmat. Both countries are afraid.
    Who did win?

    The one who ALREADY has it will win. Let Israel try to say so. And do. Make sure it's not a couple of hairs to be pulled out of your beard. Trachtebidoch.
    1. Arpad
      Arpad 20 December 2021 14: 47
      -4
      Quote: Siberian-1
      The one who ALREADY has it will win

      No one will benefit except the military-industrial complex and the extra billions spent on armaments, since yao has already been produced for trillions, but what's the point?
      Everyone is afraid and everyone spends more and more money - the output is the same zero.
      England is not alone - NATO is behind it.
      1. Roman_vh
        Roman_vh 20 December 2021 23: 34
        +1
        And where about pensioners, to whom you can distribute this money?
  29. Soldatov V.
    Soldatov V. 20 December 2021 14: 44
    +1
    Back in the 70s, calculations showed that 9 pieces with 500 c / t warheads would be enough for Great Britain to form a Nabib-type desert. Sarmat is redundant for Great Britain. Then it can go under water and the direction of the Gulf Stream can change, and this is unpredictable for the climate of Europe. soldier
    1. Arpad
      Arpad 20 December 2021 14: 49
      -2
      Quote: V.
      Back in the 70s, calculations showed that 9 pieces with 500 c / t warheads would be enough for Great Britain to form a Nabib-type desert. Sarmat is redundant for Great Britain. Then it can go under water and the direction of the Gulf Stream can change, and this is unpredictable for the climate of Europe. soldier

      England is much bigger than you think and 9 warheads will definitely not be enough
      1. Soldatov V.
        Soldatov V. 20 December 2021 15: 07
        0
        Great Britain is practically a low-lying plain, and stands on a chalk base. It washes away without bombardment. Especially in the west by the same Gulf Stream. Watch BBC films about the UK and the English Channel. yes
      2. Vadim237
        Vadim237 20 December 2021 19: 35
        -2
        In order to destroy all major cities in Great Britain, how much is enough, especially since each warhead of 9 kt.
    2. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 20 December 2021 15: 37
      +1
      It's not that.
      England's nuclear arsenal on nuclear submarines is also more than enough to destroy all major cities in Russia.
      Without the United States entering the war.
      Therefore, it is pointless to intimidate.
      1. Soldatov V.
        Soldatov V. 20 December 2021 16: 53
        0
        Note about the threat to Great Britain from SARMAT say the British themselves. Our military is talking about anywhere in the world. I think the author consulted with his military whether there was anything to bomb the kingdom for, and they answered yes. So he is afraid, panicking.
        The British nuclear submarines are equipped with American TRIDENT missiles, plus an American officer with a code and a key to launch the missiles is floating with them. Launch only on US command.
        In case of war, the destruction of military facilities in the kingdom will most likely be done with aircraft, for example, the Tu-160 or SU-34, for humanitarian reasons, with high-precision missiles with a small nuclear charge. SARMAT is like hammering nails with a microscope. bully soldier
        1. voyaka uh
          voyaka uh 20 December 2021 18: 07
          -2
          "for humanitarian reasons, high-precision missiles with a small nuclear charge" ///
          ---
          This is the first time I hear a nuclear bombing called "humanitarian".
          What can you not hear on VO ... fellow
    3. The comment was deleted.
  30. Pavel57
    Pavel57 20 December 2021 14: 49
    +3
    For the Kingdom of Sarmat, it is redundant in range. You can return to the topic of the MRBM.
  31. Siberian-1
    Siberian-1 20 December 2021 14: 49
    +1
    Quote: CastroRuiz
    And Satan can't send them to hell?
    I think no problem, it is unnecessary to wait for Sarmat. :)
    Englishwoman crap.

    For these sirs, there are simpler and larger ones. Sarmat is an individual gift for farmers behind a puddle. They themselves have already counted that 20 pieces will be enough for them. And 80% of the population won't. And all is not necessary. Leave for the assault the very wall that they put up from Mexico. The Mexicans will knock them off the wall with machetes and slingshots. There, after all, more or less pure nature will remain. You will have to PROTECT her.
  32. Siberian-1
    Siberian-1 20 December 2021 14: 55
    +1
    Quote: V.
    Back in the 70s, calculations showed that 9 pieces with 500 c / t warheads would be enough for Great Britain to form a Nabib-type desert. Sarmat is redundant for Great Britain. Then it can go under water and the direction of the Gulf Stream can change, and this is unpredictable for the climate of Europe. soldier

    They were wrong, of course. A complete desert is not needed. It is enough to lower them to the level of Greece, and in this form and "power" it will not be afraid, and its role will be reduced to the memories of its former power. Which, as psychiatrists have noticed, kills faster than a bullet. All her protectorates will fall off, because they, after all, do not need to heal, feed, and provide the BEGGARS. They, after all, did not themselves fall into such an addiction. Half is enough. the rest will tend to the sick, repair sheds, and forge metal with shovels.
  33. Siberian-1
    Siberian-1 20 December 2021 14: 58
    0
    Quote: Arpad
    Quote: Siberian-1
    The one who ALREADY has it will win

    No one will benefit except the military-industrial complex and the extra billions spent on armaments, since yao has already been produced for trillions, but what's the point?
    Everyone is afraid and everyone spends more and more money - the output is the same zero.
    England is not alone - NATO is behind it.

    The military-industrial complex in the destroyed country. Oxides. There will be nothing. Look at the movie, very believable. "Letters from a Dead Man". NATO is the further development of the Entente. Then everyone hid behind Russia. But, then the insanity of GENERAL decision making did not work yet. Today NATO is
    Turkey
    France
    Italy
    Germany
    United Kingdom
    Spain
    Greece
    Poland
    Romania
    Canada
    Netherlands
    Portugal
    Bulgaria
    Belgium
    Czech Republic
    Norway
    Hungary
    Denmark
    Croatia
    Slovakia
    Lithuania
    Slovenia
    Albania
    Estonia
    Latvia
    Luxembourg
    - completely different, with different capabilities and interests. General decision making. How is that? Who will hide behind whom this time? The Americans have stated more than once that for the interests of Turkey, Greece, they are on the corner, and do not interfere ..... This is in the past. For whom will they not interfere now? And what is NATO without ..... a crowd of gypsies, beggars, and small things who know how to yapping out of the gate.
    1. Rocj
      Rocj 20 December 2021 15: 21
      0
      No one will benefit except the military-industrial complex and the extra billions spent on armaments, since yao has already been produced for trillions, but what's the point?
      What do you offer? Not wasting money and waiting for us to be enslaved knowing that we have nothing to defend and retaliate? Therefore, and at the exit zero, everyone in this world knows who has such a weapon, you cannot touch it, otherwise they themselves will die. There is an example of a country that did not have such weapons, they are destroyed. This holds everyone back. The main thing is there is no war. So the gunpowder needs to be kept dry or we'll lose the country.
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 20 December 2021 19: 41
      0
      Ukraine and Georgia have forgotten the same they direct themselves to NATO. But the NATO principle is one on paper, one for all - in fact, every man for himself.
  34. Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov
    Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov 20 December 2021 15: 00
    +2
    "Sarmat" seriously scared the British

    ***
    The Englishwoman was fucked up ...
    ***
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 20 December 2021 15: 40
      -2
      Congratulations!
      According to the results of the poll, you have been elected the "Champion of Stupid Posts" at VO.
  35. Rocj
    Rocj 20 December 2021 15: 07
    0
    we will just destroy this mold if it attacks us at least once
    Warm up ....))
  36. Vadim Kukhtiev
    Vadim Kukhtiev 20 December 2021 15: 10
    0
    And before they did not know that we are capable of destroying England?)))))
    And the fact that the targets on the territory of Britain are entered into the missile control units? We thought that if it only starts, the Americans will snatch it out, and they will sit out behind the strait, as they used to?)))))
  37. Siberian-1
    Siberian-1 20 December 2021 15: 29
    0
    Quote: Rocj
    No one will benefit except the military-industrial complex and the extra billions spent on armaments, since yao has already been produced for trillions, but what's the point?
    What do you offer? Not wasting money and waiting for us to be enslaved knowing that we have nothing to defend and retaliate? Therefore, and at the exit zero, everyone in this world knows who has such a weapon, you cannot touch it, otherwise they themselves will die. There is an example of a country that did not have such weapons, they are destroyed. This holds everyone back. The main thing is there is no war. So the gunpowder needs to be kept dry or we'll lose the country.

    Are you talking to me?
  38. alex-sherbakov48
    alex-sherbakov48 20 December 2021 15: 38
    0
    How many Brits have been told, don't wake the Russian bear! The British should remember how their three thousand young cavalrymen from elite families perished ingloriously in the Russian-Turkish war. So now, if you rock the boat with Russia, you will disappear from the world map from the word completely !!!
  39. Dzafdet
    Dzafdet 20 December 2021 16: 31
    -2
    Information on the line of the OBS. The number of launches is unknown, the date of the deployment is also unknown. It can carry 21 warheads and so on. Far before being put into service ...
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 20 December 2021 19: 42
      0
      Next year they promise to take the first regiment into service.
  40. singless
    singless 20 December 2021 18: 51
    -1
    and why the rest are silent. insulting yes
  41. noct
    noct 20 December 2021 19: 32
    0
    Rejoice, you wanted it and more than one rocket will fly in your direction. For fidelity
  42. Spetsuga
    Spetsuga 20 December 2021 19: 35
    0
    Zhirinovsky suggested a good name "behind the package"
  43. Siberian-1
    Siberian-1 20 December 2021 19: 50
    0
    Quote: voyaka uh
    Congratulations!
    According to the results of the poll, you have been elected the "Champion of Stupid Posts" at VO.

    You have not announced the results of the survey in full. You have taken the second place of honor. Your age allows us to hope that this is not the limit for you.
  44. Siberian-1
    Siberian-1 20 December 2021 19: 51
    0
    Quote: Dzafdet
    Information on the line of the OBS. The number of launches is unknown, the date of the deployment is also unknown. It can carry 21 warheads and so on. Far before being put into service ...

    Where are you in a hurry? In time, let’s try.
  45. Siberian-1
    Siberian-1 20 December 2021 19: 54
    0
    Quote: voyaka uh
    "for humanitarian reasons, high-precision missiles with a small nuclear charge" ///
    ---
    This is the first time I hear a nuclear bombing called "humanitarian".
    What can you not hear on VO ... fellow

    This term was introduced by your godfathers because of the lake. They will be offended, after all, not respect is punishable.
  46. Siberian-1
    Siberian-1 20 December 2021 19: 57
    0
    Quote: voyaka uh
    It's not that.
    England's nuclear arsenal on nuclear submarines is also more than enough to destroy all major cities in Russia.
    Without the United States entering the war.
    Therefore, it is pointless to intimidate.

    Given the difference in population density, there will be none, and we will overcome difficulties.
  47. Siberian-1
    Siberian-1 20 December 2021 20: 00
    0
    Quote: Arpad
    Quote: V.
    Back in the 70s, calculations showed that 9 pieces with 500 c / t warheads would be enough for Great Britain to form a Nabib-type desert. Sarmat is redundant for Great Britain. Then it can go under water and the direction of the Gulf Stream can change, and this is unpredictable for the climate of Europe. soldier

    England is much bigger than you think and 9 warheads will definitely not be enough

    Why throw them at the hacienda? Let them stay, somewhere you need to leave a place for hospitals and cemeteries. There are exactly as many cities as there are tactical charges set aside specifically for this purpose. And what will a beggar, dying from disease, hunger and everything else, a country that FORMED an oppressor of nations be like? Who will come to the rescue? Really, India? Or Pakistan? Or Ireland? Or Australia? Maybe Poland, in gratitude for the fact that they so PROTECTED their ally in 1939?
  48. sabakina
    sabakina 20 December 2021 20: 23
    0
    Will Stewart, relying on the publications of the Russian media, writes that next year Russia to unprecedentedly increase the number of test launches of missiles with nuclear warheadsfearing the outbreak of World War III amid tensions with Ukraine.
    Excuse me, but how is that? UN Security Council Authorized Nuclear Weapon Tests? belay
  49. Eugene Besfamilny
    Eugene Besfamilny 20 December 2021 20: 34
    0
    And to hell with him, this island.
  50. zenion
    zenion 20 December 2021 20: 55
    0
    And if this rocket fails to fulfill the high trust placed in it, then the British themselves will make Small Britain out of it so that the verdict comes true. After that, such fear will attack the English that they will all sleep under the beds.