The flagship of the Pacific Fleet, the missile cruiser Varyag, returned to service after scheduled repairs

Pacific flagship fleet the guards order of Nakhimov missile cruiser Varyag returns to service after scheduled repairs carried out at Dalzavod. The completion of the renovation is reported on the company's official Instagram page.

The message does not contain any information about the work carried out on the cruiser, only the fact of their implementation is stated. It is emphasized that high professionalism, reliability, competence and efficiency of the company's employees allowed to complete the work on time.

Note that the "Varyag" got up for scheduled repairs at the end of last month. On November 24, the ship was already in the dry dock of Dalzavod. The company did not comment on the scope of work and the timing of the work, stating that they were planned. All work on the ship took a little over three weeks.

Guards cruiser Varyag is a missile cruiser, the third ship of Project 1164 Atlant. Laid down on July 31, 1979 at the shipyard "Named after the 61st Communards" in Nikolaev as a missile cruiser "Chervona Ukraine". Launched on July 27, 1982, entered the fleet on January 7, 1990. In September of the same year, he began an inter-fleet transition from the Black Sea Fleet to the Pacific Fleet.

In 1996 it was renamed, changing the name "Chervona Ukraine" to "Varyag", since 2002 it has been the flagship of the Pacific Fleet. In 2018, by decree of the President of Russia, the ship was awarded the Order of Nakhimov, becoming the third ship of the Russian fleet to be awarded the order after the nuclear-powered missile cruiser Peter the Great of the Northern Fleet and the guards missile cruiser Moskva of the Black Sea Fleet.

Comments

[Bear]

Timely maintenance and scheduled repairs are the key to long-term and successful operation!

[Bear]

Thanks for the comment, corrected.

[Victorio]

Quote: de_monSher

Illiteracy, awful vesch ... *)) I understand "automatic errors" - by type, I missed a letter, or something else. Or there, for fun and more expressiveness, I slightly distorted the word ... *))) You, my friend, on a patriotic site, seem to be "fighting" to raise your "braces" higher - please, write extremely competently. In this context, it would still be correct to write "On time" ... hmm ... *)))

===
mistakes and illiteracy can be remedied, much worse is the insane and simply total borrowing of English words and terms. I am at war on this occasion with my teenage son regularly and, alas, hopelessly

[de_monSher]

Well, yes ... there is such a thing. All sorts of "Easy", "Quickly", "Forward" s, etc. etc. in the Russian-speaking context they look stupid and awful ... *))) But at the same time, during the "golden age" of the liberal idea in Russia and in the CIS countries, from the early XNUMXs to the mid-tenths, I noticed how these comrade gentlemen kept the brand - to their texts was not to find fault. "Combed", competent, imaginative. Now, of course, thank God, they sank steeply. So now it's time for you, "patriots" to raise the bar in your texts. PS: I am putting words in quotation marks, like "patriot", because I myself am a citizen of Uzbekistan ... Uzbek. And I shouldn't use these words in direct speech, without quotation marks, when I talk with you, citizens of Russia ... *))

[Flooding]

Quote: de_monSher

So now it's time for you, "patriots", to raise the bar in your texts. PS: I am putting words in quotation marks like "patriot", because I myself am a citizen of Uzbekistan ... Uzbek. And I shouldn't use these words in direct speech, without quotation marks, when I talk to you, citizens of Russia.

that is, if you wrote the word patriot without quotation marks, it would mean that you mean patriots of Uzbekistan?

[de_monSher]

Yes, that's right ... thanks for your understanding ... *)) I explained so that they would not perceive my words as irony or a mockery ...

[Flooding]

Quote: de_monSher

Yes, that's right ... thanks for your understanding ... *)) I explained so that they would not perceive my words as irony or a mockery ...

Thank you for the clarification
means "patriot" (in quotes) in your writing means all patriots of the world except patriots of Uzbekistan
and in writing a citizen of Russia, for example, it would mean all the patriots of the world except the patriots of Russia.
very confusing, isn't it?

[de_monSher]

*)))) Hmm ... well, yes, it looks a little funny. But let's all the same, consider the context. In the context of this site, I mean only Russian patriots. Plus to the context, there is also an anamnesis. At one time, I was swearing here = look at my 5 warnings = with "inveterate" patriots of Russia, for whom Uzbekistan is already a distant foreign country, and in some aspects is a "hostile" state ... *))) Therefore, consider that this is even my reflection - the separation of "patriots" and "patriotisms" ... *)))) And this is all the more insulting that I grew up in the Arctic, lived for a long time in the Far East - Primorye, Sakhalin, Kamchatka. And these "steamers" = the same old "Varyag", project 58 = family for me - I met and saw them off in due time ... *)))

[Flooding]

Quote: de_monSher

Plus to the context, there is also an anamnesis

for the "anamnesis" undoubtedly +
but I won't read the history of comments, thank you

Quote: de_monSher

take a look at my 5 warnings

in the mobile version, apparently, the functionality is cut
I only see a star where I have "stripes"
maybe these are the insignia for scandalousness?

Quote: de_monSher

it is all the more offensive that I grew up in the Arctic, lived for a long time in the Far East - Primorye, Sakhalin, Kamchatka

I myself am amazed that many of those who "drown" for the Soviet past have forgotten the most important thing that made the multinational people Soviet - the friendship of peoples.
alas it is so

[de_monSher]

No, no ... I didn't suggest that you read ... *)))) It's just a number five, in a red square, I think it's visible not only to me alone ... *)))) Although, I don't know how " says "the engine of this site ... *)))

[Ros 56]

Nobody sees your tsifirki except you, as well as my tsifirki 9. And not necessarily for the mat.

[Victorio]

Quote: de_monSher

It's just the number five, in a red square, I think it's visible not only to me alone.

===
? I can't see anything from you

[Ros 56]

Well, in that case, you are a purely nominal Uzbek, so to speak by birth. After all, you can be anyone by birth and at the same time be Russian or different in mentality, depending on the place of residence, education, and many other factors.

[de_monSher]

Well, this is even, very, very strong, it is not good to say that ... *))) I am not a nominal Uzbek, but more than real ... *)) Yes, for me the Russian language is more comfortable than Uzbek. And yes, I grew up surrounded by Russian culture, so your literature is mine as well. But when you finally understand that wealth is in diversity ... = Thought = ... Reasonable, of course - "blue" or "rainbow" diversity, everyone has enough - then your many internal conflicts in the country will disappear ... *))

[Ros 56]

Well, excuse me, I didn't want to offend. But you just did not understand me.

[de_monSher]

So, in October, I was "overclocked", I wanted to "fit" to this site an article about my Alma Mater - the good old Tashkent State University, now the National University of Uzbekistan. I walked through the faculties, starting with my own - Applied Mathematics and Mechanics. Such nostalgia took me, my soul trembled. Everything was fine until I had a choice of what to visit - the Ministry of Innovations or the Romanovsky Institute of Mathematics = they were built on the territory of the Tashkent "university town" on the site of the old department of physical education =. To my misfortune, I looked in min. Innovation. Two laboratories were enough for me ... hmm ... "laboratories", probably - Robotics and Space Research. In general, I am not such a patriot (with enthusiastic brainwashed) of my country to write something good about this fraud, equated to the ministry. After that, I really fell into despondency. I’ll probably throw out the chapters about this ministry, and look at the Institute of Mathematics ... *))

[OSE4Kinsura]

Otlshujezdup! FROM PITSADBOLOYJETUE MFL

[Hiroo Onoda]

Or maybe you are fighting with windmills? Language is an analog way of conveying information, not digital. And whether we like it or not, it will change.
Otherwise, in the struggle for primacy, you can slide to the point of absurdity, and to the detriment of convenience, say not "Internet", but "some kind of krakazabra from a few words", not "car", but "self-propelled cart"

[Paranoid50]

Quote: Hiroo Onoda

Otherwise, in the struggle for primacy, you can slide to the point of absurdity, and to the detriment of convenience, say not "Internet", but "some kind of krakazabra from a few words", not "car", but "self-propelled cart"

There is such a state - Israel is called. So there, when a new word (definition) appears from beyond the hillock, a whole commission gathers, which decides how to call this neologism in Hebrew.

[Hiroo Onoda]

Quote: Paranoid50

a whole commission is collected

People are delusional

[Victorio]

Quote: Paranoid50

There is such a state - Israel is called. So there, when a new word (definition) appears from beyond the hillock, a whole commission gathers, which decides how to call this neologism in Hebrew.

===
Yes, I remember Kedmi talking about it in some program. and how surprised he was when he arrived in Moscow after a long absence, from the abundance of foreign words on signs, print and TV.

[Victorio]

Quote: Hiroo Onoda

Or maybe you are fighting with wind turbines? Language is an analog way of conveying information, not digital. And whether we like it or not, it will change.
Otherwise, in the struggle for primacy, you can slide to the point of absurdity, and to the detriment of convenience, say not "Internet", but "some kind of krakazabra from a few words", not "car", but "self-propelled cart"

===
I don’t know, but I’m not indifferent to this. as for analogs, it was possible not to invent the "plane", but to take it with "aircraft", otherwise it somehow primitively "flies itself", or the word "ship" is given by the hospital, it is better "wessel", and the "machine gun" is generally dark and further, etc. there is a rich Russian, there are linguists, there is life and common sense.You need to look for a golden mean, and work in this direction.

[Sergey3]

But in my opinion, you are fighting in vain. Everything in the world is developing and improving, there is no need to oppose it. Different languages ​​on the planet are misunderstandings, strife, wars. It is good when we, if we do not find a common language, but at least common words. If a foreign word has taken root and is actively used, this is very good, do not oppose it.

[Hypertension]

Quote: Victorio

mistakes and illiteracy are fixable, much worse crazy and simple total borrowing English words and terms... I'm at war about this with my teenage son regularly and, alas, hopelessly

Fight, but in moderation. Borrowing words in Russian is not uncommon.
Total - from the French. total "all, full", further from lat. totalis from totus "whole, whole"
Term - from lat. terminus “boundary stone, boundary mark; the border"
Regularly - from lat. regularis “containing instructions; valid rule, binding "
Or are you against exclusively Anglicisms? Well, the reality is that the English language dominates at the moment in the informational, scientific and entertainment environment. That is life.
And if you are concerned about the purity of the Russian language, then: Total - complete; term - concept; regular - permanent.

[Victorio]

Quote: Hyperion

Fight, but in moderation. Borrowing words in Russian is not uncommon.
Total - from the French. total "all, full", further from lat. totalis from totus "whole, whole"
The term is from lat. terminus “boundary stone, boundary mark; the border"
Regularly - from lat. regularis “containing instructions; valid rule, binding "
Or are you against exclusively Anglicisms? Well, the reality is that the English language dominates at the moment in the informational, scientific and entertainment environment. That is life.
And if you are concerned about the purity of the Russian language, then: Total - complete; term - concept; regular - permanent.

===
thanks, but I'll figure out what to do myself somehow.
I did not write about the need to get rid of the already existing and common foreign words. the question is about what is happening now. and only the blind or the deaf cannot notice this.
but I have nothing against English, let the native speakers of this language think about it. Russian is not indifferent to me.

[Hypertension]

Quote: Victorio

what is happening now. and only the blind or the deaf cannot notice this.

And what's wrong if people know (at least partially) another language? But forgetting your own, of course, is not worth it.

Quote: Victorio

Russian is not indifferent to me.

You can see how much you care about him (spelled together, yeah). An extra comma, and the syntax is lame ... Plus, for some reason, do not select capital letters. As if you were scribbling a telegram ...
These are the defenders of the Russian language ...

[Victorio]

Quote: Hyperion

These are the defenders of the Russian language ...

===
? Thanks for the tips, there was a solid four in Russian. and it does not change anything from what I have written. and again, I have nothing against English.

[Hypertension]

Quote: Victorio

and again, I have nothing against English.

And I don’t defend English. It's just that times like this are now English. Therefore, fighting with your son, you will either make him a black sheep among your peers, or make yourself look like a retrograde in his eyes.

[Victorio]

Quote: Hyperion

Quote: Victorio

and again, I have nothing against English.

And I don’t defend English. It's just times like this now - English speaking... Therefore, fighting with your son, you will either make him a black sheep among your peers, or make yourself look like a retrograde in his eyes.

===
thanks, but no need to repeat

[Victorio]

Quote: Hyperion

Quote: Victorio
me not indifferent Russian.

You can see how much he is to you not indifferent (written together, yeah)

===
) work on bugs here https://advego.com/text/

[Hypertension]

Quote: Victorio

work on bugs here https://advego.com/text/

This online spell checker is bullshit. You and so, and so drive in - the result is the same. Apparently, this program does not take into account the context. There are rules:

We write the word "not indifferent" together, if we can replace in the text with a synonym without the particle "not". Sample sentence. Your decision is not indifferent to me. (You can replace it with a synonym important). We write the combination "not indifferent" separately if the text contains the following conditions: words that reinforce the negation; opposition with the union "a". Sample sentences. Personally, my mother’s opinion is not at all indifferent to me.

[Victorio]

Quote: Hyperion

Quote: Victorio

work on bugs here https://advego.com/text/

This online spell checker is bullshit. You and so, and so drive in - the result is the same. Apparently, this program does not take into account the context. There are rules:

We write the word "not indifferent" together, if we can replace in the text with a synonym without the particle "not". Sample sentence. Your decision is not indifferent to me. (You can replace it with a synonym important). We write the combination "not indifferent" separately if the text contains the following conditions: words that reinforce the negation; opposition with the union "a". Sample sentences. Personally, my mother’s opinion is not at all indifferent to me.

===
does not convince.
/ We write separately with the particle "not" - "not indifferent" when it implies negation, and when the logical stress falls on this particle.
For example: I am not indifferent to Margarita. /
I'm not indifferent to Russian

[Hypertension]

Quote: Victorio

I'm not indifferent to Russian

You had something in your comment:

Quote: Victorio

I am not indifferent to Russian.

Logical emphasis on the word "Russian". And it can be replaced with the synonym "important". - "Russian is important to me."

[Victorio]

Quote: Hyperion

Logical emphasis on the word "Russian". And it can be replaced with the synonym "important". - "Russian is important to me."

===

Quote: Hyperion

/ We write separately with the particle "not" - "not indifferent" when it implies negation, and when logical stress falls on this particle.

- on a particle not, but not a word, i.e.
me not Russian is indifferent.

[Hypertension]

If you have a logical emphasis on not, then it's a matter of tongue-tied. Since in the text it should fall on the word "Russian":

Quote: Victorio

but against English I have nothing, let oh it the carriers of this think language... I'm not indifferent Russian.

In general, after "me"it would be nice to put a particle same... After all, you want to say that you don't care about English, but Russian is important to you. And the question was not: whether the Russian language is indifferent to you or not.

[Victorio]

I have already written everything to you, it will be new something in your research on this issue, then write.

[Hypertension]

Quote: Victorio

will new something in your research on this issue, then write.

What it means new? When will the rules of the Russian language be changed? OK.

[Victorio]

Quote: Hyperion

Quote: Victorio

will new something in your research on this issue, then write.

What it means new? When will the rules of the Russian language be changed? OK.

===
you completely figured out the "old"? and where is a reasonable refutation (not your speculation) on this:
falls on a particle not, not a word, i.e. to me not Russian is indifferent, there is an increase in denial.

so my phrase "will be new something in your research on this issue, then write "was about this.

[Hypertension]

Quote: Victorio

falls on a particle not, not a word, i.e. to me not Russian is indifferent, there is an increase in denial.

I already wrote that if you have an emphasis on not, then the point is tongue-tied.

[Victorio]

Quote: Hyperion

Quote: Victorio

falls on a particle not, not a word, i.e. to me not Russian is indifferent, there is an increase in denial.

I already wrote that if you have an emphasis on not, then the point is tongue-tied.

===
the result. separate spelling in my case takes place. there is no error. Total.

[Hypertension]

There is a mistake, but I have no patience. But I'm not your personal teacher of the Russian language, so write as you see fit.

[Victorio]

Quote: Hyperion

There is a mistake, but I have no patience. But I'm not your personal teacher of the Russian language, so write as you see fit.

===

Quote: Hyperion

You can see how much you care about him (spelled together, yeah).

Quote: Hyperion

When will the rules of the Russian language be changed?

===
) there is an error, but it is not.

[Hypertension]

Quote: Victorio

there is an error, but it is not.

There will be no mistake if the rules are changed.

[Victorio]

Quote: Hyperion

Quote: Victorio

there is an error, but it is not.

There will be no mistake if the rules are changed.

===
) you will not die of modesty.
// Both options (combined and separately) can be correct. It depends on the context (what exactly you want to say).

If the negation intensifies, then it is written separately, here it is not - this is a particle of negation.
If the statement is underlined, then it is written together, here it is not - this is a prefix.
To check the meaning, you need to insert one more word:
1) I [by no means, at all, not at all] do not care about Russian - the denial is growing
2) I am [very, enough] not indifferent to Russian - the statement is underlined //

[Hypertension]

Quote: Victorio

If the negation intensifies, then it is written separately, here it is not - this is a particle of negation.

Is it getting stronger for you?

Quote: Victorio

I am [very, enough] not indifferent to Russian - the statement is underlined //

You had a statement. Your denial about English:

Quote: Victorio

but I have nothing against English

And again - the logical stress should be on the word "Russian", otherwise your oral and written speech leaves much to be desired.
If you wrote: "I am not indifferent to Russian, but I have nothing against English" - then it is correct.
But "I'm not indifferent to (important) Russian" is wrong.

[Victorio]

Quote: Hyperion

You had a statement.

But "I'm not indifferent to (important) Russian" is wrong.

===
no, excuse me, but that's exactly how it works for me:
1) I [by no means, at all, not at all] do not care about Russian - the denial is growing

happy new year, all the best.

[Mylenef]

And how does he justify these borrowings?

[Alien From]

An elegant and powerful ship! They knew how to do in the Union, they knew how!

[Sergey Obraztsov]

Since the repairs took place on a planned basis and without "shifts to the right", then everything is in order with the technical condition of the ship. Which is good news, given the current number of Pacific Fleet pennants.

[tralflot1832]

For 23 days in the dock, they had to: Inspect the rudder group, replace the stern tube seals, defect, repair or replace the outboard "fittings", replace the hull protector, clean the underwater part of the hull and paint in several layers, and all for 23 days. docking period, says that the Varyag hull is in good condition.

[Volder]

Quote: tralflot1832

In 23 days at the dock, should have

What kind of repair is this? It is rather a revision of units and painting of the bottom, nothing more.

[tralflot1832]

And if the propeller was changed, we had a fixed pitch propeller, so cavitation sharpened it so that I stupidly cut myself pull out the multi-ton shaft with the screw from the deadwood.

[Hiroo Onoda]

Our proud "Varyag" does not surrender to the enemy!

[Sergey Obraztsov]

Since the repairs took place on a planned basis and without "shifts to the right", then everything is in order with the technical condition of the ship. Which is good news, given the current number of Pacific Fleet pennants.

[kventinasd]

It's great, of course, but it's a pity that it, like the RC "Moscow", cannot be stuffed with calibers and zircons. Formidable ships would have turned out.

[Hiroo Onoda]

For whom are they formidable? Well stuffed - how to shoot them? At random?

[PROXOR]

You can stuff it, but the desirability of such modernization is not high.

[1Alexey]

Quote: kventinasd

It's great, of course, but it's a pity that it, like the RC "Moscow", cannot be stuffed with calibers and zircons. Formidable ships would have turned out.

You can stuff it, but with the available weapons it is quite a strong ship, even by modern standards. And we now have a shortage of powerful warships, therefore, in my opinion, it is better to build a new powerful ship than to spend resources and time on upgrading already rather strong ships.

It's another matter if, without modernization, a powerful ship can no longer effectively continue service (like, for example, "Admiral Kuznetsov"), then modernization is necessary, but without an urgent need for modernization, it is better to build a new ship.

[GAndr]

The last of the dinosaurs of the great and mighty Soviet fleet.
I don’t know when we will be able to build drummers of this size now :(
Although some now believe that the time of the large cruisers has passed, like the time of the Battleships ...

[zwlad]

This is how we build. Only they are now called Ash-M.

[Doccor18]

Quote: GAndr

Although some now believe that the time of large cruisers is over ...

The largest maritime powers both built large ocean-going warships and continue to build (frigates of 5-8 kt. And destroyers of 9-14 kt.), So the Varyag does not at all look like a "mammoth among elephants" ...

[Vladimir1155]

great news, let it serve, especially since there is information that volcanoes take off, that is, let this combat-ready ship serve until new frigates come to replace it

[Castro Ruiz]

As battleships disappeared in their time, so cruisers will now disappear. The destroyers, frigates and corvettes remain.

[Paranoid50]

Quote: CastroRuiz

As battleships disappeared in their time, so cruisers will now disappear.

Everything passes and this will pass...(C) It is possible that the entire surface fleet will someday disappear as a species, but this is not certain.

[askort154]

Just don't remember what it was called until 1996.
"Varyag" is not to blame for this.

[Castro Ruiz]

Yaa wrote about the cruiser as a howl class. ships and not about a specific ship. Though they threw me minuses, I'm right.

[Jacket in stock]

Hmm.
Forty years of the ship.
I remember there were cars on the site of the military department, a manual for students, perhaps even less than forty years old. So they had all the wheels attached to the asphalt so that it was not clear where the wheels were, where the asphalt was. And the cables were no better, everything blurred like wet soap.
And the technical level of our flagship's equipment is sadness, sadness and hopelessness.

[de_monSher]

Well, all the same - a "steamer" is a "steamer", not a machine. After each trip - maintenance, "licking" the case, cars, electronics, weapons. Because, probably, 40 years for a battleship is not exactly the same as 40 years for a car or even for a tank or BMP / armored personnel carrier ... *))

[UA3QHP]

Quote: de_monSher

After each trip - maintenance, "licking" the case, cars, electronics, weapons

Don't lick the 6-year-old 3P2010S lamp of the ship plus years of electronics development, it cannot replace even a simple signal processor, even a XNUMX release.

[de_monSher]

I don't even know where to put this tetrode lamp, 6P3S on a warship = yes, and, by the way, it is almost 90 years old, as far as I remember = ... *))) and it works at frequencies up to 5 MHz, like ... *)) I just remember the "trash bin" of my childhood, in Leninsk = if anything, this is Baikonur = ... There were wonderful lamps, in ceramic cases, or mini and micro versions ... *))) but by the way , I will not argue with you - if you so want to lick the lamps - this is your right. I mean, "licking" the ship's hull and its components. The difference, in my opinion, is obvious ... *)))

[UA3QHP]

It's just that the electronics of forty, and most likely another plus 10-20 years ago, somewhat does not meet modern requirements, how do not service it.

[de_monSher]

You, somehow, have a very bad attitude towards electronics, especially - military, 80s ... *))) Please do not forget that these were the times of the giants - Ustinov, Gorshkov, Ogarkov ... And by the way , the latter - as far as I remember, is the father of the Soviet system "Maneuver", which in fact gave a start in the life of a modern network-centric system of warfare ... *))) And I, seriously, am not at all sure what is on the "Varyag" , somehow radio tubes are widely used ... *)) Processor assemblies, like I300 - I can still believe ... *)))

[UA3QHP]

I treat her normally (in reality).
Therefore, for the ship laid down in 1979. They began to design electronics in about 1968, and maybe even earlier. So there will be a lot of lamp technology.

[de_monSher]

But this is not 6P3S, no? .. *))) And in general, there is a widespread opinion that the dude who invented the field-effect transistor should be shot from a large-caliber machine gun - because to the characteristics of the radio tubes that ALSO evolved, including standard sizes, he did not hold out. But nevertheless, what is that is - field-effect transistors, CMOS VLSI integrated circuits, were quite so successfully introduced both in the USA and the USSR, from the late 60s, early 70s ... Do not exaggerate ... *)) )

[UA3QHP]

But this is not 6P3S, is it?

There are no speakerphones and no radios? So there may well be 6P3S.

[UA3QHP]

I am not exaggerating, just the real development cycle of electronic equipment from the moment of the technical assignment to the moment of serial deliveries is more than 10 years.

[de_monSher]

Hello ... *)) If my memory serves me right, it's kind of like a power amplifier on old consumer electronics ... I still don't understand where it can be attached ... *))) Just on the same site, I communicate with a dude who claims that he works for the Russian space ... "communication", in general, it turns out one-sided - like, "talker, a find for a spy" ... I listen to an endless stream of thoughts about radio tubes on modern Russian launch vehicles ... I listen, I listen - I agree, at times ... I listen, I listen, I listen ... "whining" about "everything is gone, everything is fucked up" from the dude is endless ... *)))

[UA3QHP]

Not only in the household, a sufficiently powerful low-frequency lamp for widespread use. There was also a military modification with the "E" index.

[de_monSher]

I remember this ... *))) with a metallized top like this ... *))) as a child, in Murmansk, I collected amps on it ...

[de_monSher]

Father, in the 61st, received his first platoon, 34-ok, in Termez ... *)) perhaps from that time he remained in his store ... *))

[UA3QHP]

It is quite possible that they were used in radio stations of the 9-P family, which were installed on armored vehicles, including the T-34.

[de_monSher]

Brother, I received my first assignment in SAVO, in the 88th ... platoon 54-ok ... near Ust-Ka ... there, if my memory serves me, these lamas also stood in the HF transmitter-receiver 10-RT. .. *)) The Chinese mercilessly crushed these radio stations at all exercises ... *))

[TermNachTer]

And this cannot but rejoice. It's time to modernize the old people, albeit not as thoroughly as the aircraft carrier. Increase combat effectiveness.

[Stepan S]

Moscow. December 17. INTERFAX.RU - The flames have engulfed almost completely the corvette under construction at Severnaya Verf, Interfax was told in the unified dispatch service.

"The fire spread over 800 square meters. This is almost the entire Provorny corvette," the service said. At first, they said that the area of ​​fire was 80 square meters.

"Varyag" returned to the fleet, and then the "Provorny" corvette intended for the Pacific Fleet burned down.

[Mylenef]

Quote: Hyperion

Quote: Victorio

mistakes and illiteracy are fixable, much worse crazy and simple total borrowing English words and terms... I'm at war about this with my teenage son regularly and, alas, hopelessly

Fight, but in moderation. Borrowing words in Russian is not uncommon.
Total - from the French. total "all, full", further from lat. totalis from totus "whole, whole"
Term - from lat. terminus “boundary stone, boundary mark; the border"
Regularly - from lat. regularis “containing instructions; valid rule, binding "
Or are you against exclusively Anglicisms? Well, the reality is that the English language dominates at the moment in the informational, scientific and entertainment environment. That is life.
And if you are concerned about the purity of the Russian language, then: Total - complete; term - concept; regular - permanent.

If there is a direct Russian analogue of the English word, why use the latter?
It is also a stupid "respect and respect", as if they do not understand that this is one and the same