Kriegsmarine fast landing barges

25
Kriegsmarine fast landing barges
Landing barges F308 and F370 - Type A and F494 (Tynos) and F495 (Naxos) - Type C in Thessaloniki, July 1943

High-speed landing barges (BDB) is a definition that has become entrenched and is generally accepted today in the domestic historical literature. At the same time, the German designation for these ships was different - self-propelled sea barges (Marinefährprahm or MFP for short). A series of such warships was used not only in the Kriegsmarine, but also in some fleets Allied states of Nazi Germany in the period from 1941 to 1945.

These landing barges could be called high-speed data with a big stretch, since their speed, according to the declared characteristics, never exceeded 10,5 knots (19,5 km / h). The main tank landing ships of the allies LCT-5 and LCT-6, which developed a speed of 8-10 knots, had approximately the same sailing characteristics. In part, this definition could be explained by good seaworthiness, which made it possible to maintain speed and on the wave, in contrast to smaller landing craft.



The fast landing barges were designed for Operation Sea Lion


Like other German landing ships, the BDB was originally designed for Operation Sea Lion, an invasion of the British Isles. At the same time, Hitler's plans were Napoleonic. Conceiving a landing in Great Britain, he planned to transfer at least 700 thousand soldiers and more than 125 thousand horses across the English Channel, excluding various military equipment.

To cope with this task, the Germans lacked the capabilities of the fleet. In 1940, Germany simply did not have specialized amphibious assault ships of mass construction, and everything that could be hastily commandeered in the ports of the captured European states and withdrawn from the national economy did little to meet the solution of ambitious amphibious tasks.

The infantry could be transferred on various boats, barges, trawlers, lighters and other captured ships, as well as on cruisers and destroyers of the Kriegsmarine. But for transportation tanks, cars and various military equipment, they were not suitable. Civilian ships would have to be extensively redesigned, which was time-consuming. Under these conditions, work began in Germany on the development of specialized amphibious assault vehicles.

Self-propelled sea barges became one of such projects.

German high-speed landing barges, presumably type C, at the "Kuban Bridgehead", 1943, photo: waralbum.ru

They were developed in a fairly short time, the construction was launched already in 1941. But by that time, the vector of Nazi Germany's military policy had finally shifted to the East. By the time the first Type A MFPs were built, Operation Sea Lion had already been canceled.

What were the German BDBs?


The German BDB were easy-to-manufacture and operate ships that could be built in mass quantities even with low-skilled labor. Outwardly, they resembled British and American tank landing ships of the LCT series, as well as Russian amphibious "bolinders" from the period of the First World War.

At the same time, the German landing vehicles had a number of features that distinguished them from the ships of the Allies. So, the second bottom of the German BDB was made flat, which simplified production. Also, all MFPs had a higher double bottom space, which made it possible to abandon the presence of a second side. Reservation of the sides of the landing barges reached 20-25 mm, while the wheelhouse was also reserved on the MFP D series ships, which increased the survivability of the ships.

The BDB bow ramp, the design of which differed from the ramp on the Allied landing ships, seemed to be a completely successful solution. If on the LCT tank landing barges the ramp was simply a lid that folds forward, then on the German BDB the unit consisted of a front gangway and floating structures connected to it by a hinge. This solution provided a gentler and easier descent to the shore of heavy tracked and wheeled vehicles. The total length of the ramp reached 5 meters, which was more than on the Allied ships.

The total length of the BDB hull was 47 meters; the length of the hull of the MFP type D barges increased to almost 50 meters. The maximum draft is 1,45 meters (1,35 meters for the D series). The width of the ships was just over 6,5 meters. The standard displacement is 200-300 tons. The crew of the ships, depending on the options, ranged from 17 to 25 people. The increase in the crew was influenced primarily by the increase in anti-aircraft and artillery weapons on board the barge.

Stand model (1: 100) MFP type D (tail number "F-834") at the International Maritime Museum Hamburg, photo: wikimedia.org

The BDB was driven by three Deutz diesel automobile engines with a total capacity of 390 hp. With. Each of them worked on its own propeller. The maximum speed of the barges was 10,5 knots. At the same time, in the cruising mode, only the middle engine could work, which was enough to provide the BDB with a speed of up to 7,5 knots (approximately 13,5 km / h). When the barges were fully loaded, the speed could be lower. The engines were quite economical; during cruising, the cruising range of the BDB could reach up to 1 nautical miles.

During the war, the German fleet operated high-speed landing barges of four main types.

MFP type B differed in the increased height of the cargo hold (3,19 meters versus 2,74 meters on modification A). This modification could already take on board the Panther and Tiger tanks. At the same time, the carrying capacity of barges of types A, B and C was approximately the same and amounted to 80–100 tons. On the MFP type C modification, the height of the cargo hold was further increased to 3,29 meters.

The largest in the series were the MFP type D barges. The ship's hull was lengthened and slightly widened. The maximum lifting capacity has increased to 140 tons. Instead of an open wheelhouse, a full-fledged armored superstructure appeared on such barges, which, together with the engine compartment, was moved slightly forward. In the superstructure, in addition to the helmsman, there was also a radio room, and on ships of this type there were full-fledged living quarters for the crew.

The armament of the BDB was varied. Anti-aircraft armament, originally represented by only two 20-mm machine guns, was multiplied in the course of hostilities. On those BDBs that were not used in the rear, in 1942, they began to install 75-mm artillery pieces, including captured ones. Over time, 88-mm naval guns began to be installed on the barges.

Encountered modifications


Some of the German MFPs were used as minelayers.

No special alterations of the structure were made for this. At any time, they could be easily returned to the solution of traditional BDB tasks. As a minelayer, the ship took on board up to 36 sea mines of various types. To designate such ships, the letter "M" was added to the name, for example - MFP AM or MFP CM.

Bench model (1: 100) of the AFP self-propelled artillery barge at the International Maritime Museum Hamburg, photo: wikimedia.org

The barges were used as minelayers in those theaters of operations where Germany did not have specialized ships or their number was extremely limited. As minelayers, high-speed landing barges were used, in particular, in the Black Sea, as well as in lake and river theaters of operations on the Eastern Front.

The laying of mines with a BDB was most likely the most original in history.

The setting of sea mines was carried out with a lowered ramp, from which the mines were dropped into the water by the crew of the barge. When setting, the ship moved in reverse, which led to a decrease in speed and an increase in the time for setting minefields. This could be critical if surface ships were expected to appear or aviation enemy. Also, this method of laying mines directly depended on the roughness of the sea.

On MFP type DM, mines were set in the usual way - from the stern. On such barges on the upper deck, special rail guides were installed on which mines were placed. In total, such minelayers could carry up to 54 sea mines.

In addition to minelayers, BDBs also existed in the form of artillery ships.

German designation AFP (Artilleriefährprahm - self-propelled artillery barge). The ships had design features: a slightly changed arrangement of living quarters and superstructures, as well as additional booking: from 20 to 100 mm. The superstructures were shifted to the middle of the ship, and the main artillery weapons were placed on the bow and stern on a reinforced deck. The ramp on such ships did not descend, and the ammunition of the guns was stored in the cargo hold.

BDB with enhanced anti-aircraft weapons

Changes in the design and installation of artillery systems led to an increase in the mass of the ship by 70-80 tons, while the speed dropped to 8 knots.

Artillery armament, depending on the year of construction or shipyard, could be very different. Basically, it consisted of two 88 mm or two 105 mm guns. In addition, the ships had developed anti-aircraft armament, which could be represented by 1–2 37-mm anti-aircraft guns or two 20-mm quad anti-aircraft guns, plus paired or single 20-mm machine guns.

Combat capabilities of the BDB


During the war years, high-speed landing barges showed their best side.

The Germans actively used these ships in all theaters of operations. In the Baltic, the Black Sea, Norway, the Mediterranean Sea. For example, Italy under license built at least 100 of its barge variants under the designation Motozattera (MZ). There was work everywhere for these ships. In Germany, during the war years, about 700 MFP landing barges of all types were built.

Their main and main task was the transportation and transportation of troops and cargo. But, in addition, MFPs were often used to cover coastal convoys. Due to the presence of advanced weapons on board, such ships were often responsible for providing the air defense of the convoy, and could also drive off small ships and boats of the enemy with artillery fire. Also, the BDB were capable of providing direct fire support to the landing troops or treating coastal targets with fire.

The ships, simple and cheap to manufacture, have proven to be very versatile. Moreover, their small size allowed them to be transported by rail with subsequent assembly on site. This is how the BDB ended up on the Ladoga, Onega and Peipsi lakes, where they were used by German troops.

A significant part of the German fleet in the Black Sea was also made up of BDB and Siebel ferries... At the same time, self-propelled barges, due to the presence of artillery weapons and advanced anti-aircraft weapons, posed a serious threat to all Soviet torpedo boats, small hunters and armored boats.

German BDB, which became a trophy of Soviet sailors, presumably next to torpedo boats G-5, photo: goskatalog.ru

At the same time, they were a difficult target for aviation. Their small size, good maneuverability and strong anti-aircraft armament, which on some barges was quite comparable to the anti-aircraft armament of a destroyer or destroyer, made them a very dangerous target. It is no coincidence that the Germans often recruited BDB to cover convoys from air strikes.

The small draft of the BDB (1,45 meters in the stern and 1 meter in the bow) was also an important plus, since it often made the barges practically invulnerable to torpedoes of Soviet submarines. At the same time, the design features of the high-speed landing barges made them resistant to light fire, which was predominantly present on board small Soviet surface ships.

The variety of applications has made the high-speed landing barges one of the most versatile ships in the German navy. Conceived as airborne, they often performed combat missions rather than transport missions. For the Kriegsmarine, these were real workhorses, which were often used to plug all the holes that appeared in the absence of other specialized surface ships.
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    20 December 2021 06: 46
    The variety of applications has made the high-speed landing barges one of the most versatile ships in the German navy.
    Not only German, they provided their allies, and we used them as trophies. For example, BDB-20 is an artillery landing barge of the USSR Navy, type F, from 16.05.1949 - BSS-32110. Former German F 575 C2, enlisted on April 15.04.1942, 08.1943 in the lists of ships of the German Navy and launched in 29.09.1943 at the State Shipyard in Varna (Bulgaria) by order of Germany. 29.08.1944/30.10.1944/07.04.1947 damaged by Soviet aviation in Genichesk, but was restored and reintroduced. On 28.08.1948/50/XNUMX captured by Soviet troops as a trophy in Sistovo during the liberation of Bulgaria and on XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX enlisted in the Danube military flotilla. XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX transferred to the Black Sea Fleet, XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX withdrawn from service, disarmed, reorganized into a self-propelled dry cargo barge and handed over to the Naval Construction Directorate, and in the XNUMXs. decommissioned and excluded from the lists of naval vessels in connection with the transfer to the Stock Property Department for dismantling and sale.
  2. +6
    20 December 2021 11: 31
    The barges were used as minelayers in those theaters of operations where Germany did not have specialized ships or their number was extremely limited. As minelayers, high-speed landing barges were used, in particular, in the Black Sea, as well as in lake and river theaters of operations on the Eastern Front.

    PMSM, the most famous success of mine laying with BDB is the death of three ships of the 6th MM flotilla. smile
    The result of the operation in Narva Bay was the loss of three first-class ships by the German fleet, 286 people were killed, 108 were taken prisoner. The main reason can be considered the explosion on the mines of the Seeigel IXb obstacle installed by German landing barges. The latter had extremely primitive navigation equipment, therefore, significant inaccuracies were allowed in the location of the fields. By the way, the flotilla commander pointed out this circumstance even before entering the fatal performance, but then they did not listen to his opinion. It is possible that the commander of the barge detachment deliberately set up a few cables to the west than planned, because, not being sure of his location, he was afraid to end up at previous sets, that is, in the role in which the 6th flotilla was his fault.
    © M. Morozov, S. Patyanin
    The ships, simple and cheap to manufacture, have proven to be very versatile. Moreover, their small size allowed them to be transported by rail with subsequent assembly on site. This is how the BDB ended up on the Ladoga, Onega and Peipsi lakes, where they were used by German troops.

    And there were definitely MFPs on Ladoga? And not the Siebel ferries (and not the naval, but the Luftwaffe)?
    1. +9
      20 December 2021 12: 23
      Before the advent of German ferries, the Finns fought something like this. July 1941

      Then Siebel arrived.
      and in the harbor of Lahdenpohja, the assembly process began
      1. +9
        20 December 2021 12: 28
        Built, built



        and finally built
        1. +9
          20 December 2021 12: 32
          appropriate armament


          and not naval, but the Luftwaffe
          Keller came to see what and how. Commander of the 1st German Air Fleet. And then the Finns were given
          1. +1
            21 December 2021 12: 28
            Quote: Crowe
            Keller came to see what and how. Commander of the 1st German Air Fleet. And then the Finns were given

            The naval group "Nord" complained that Luftflotte 1 took over the entire leadership of the "Fähre Ost" formation and prepared it, practically not listening to the advice of the sailors.
            After the formation, according to the order of the Supreme Commander of the Luftwaffe, the Siebel ferry unit called "Fähre Ost", this command structure remained purely formal, in fact, Luftflotte 1 directed everything in such a way that Commander 31 was placed at their disposal from the Nord group as an adviser on naval and tactical issues. .MSFl could hardly influence the commander of Luftflotte 1 and his chief of staff, who had been there many times. At the same time, Luftflotte 1, due to insufficient experience, underestimated primarily the importance of naval skills and training in formation movement in conditions of limited use of signal equipment. Despite weeks of training and training of ferry crews in naval practice, tactics and signaling service to the commander of 31.MSFl, which in his KTB [combat log] responded about Operation 8 / 9.10 literally as follows:

            "The effectiveness of the artillery of Siebel ferries under favorable weather conditions is excellent. So, patrol boat No. 175 was covered and set on fire by the first volleys from a distance of 7 km, having lost the ability to maneuver. Otherwise, the discipline and order of battle during the many hours of firefight were absolutely terrifying [lit. - "hair stood on end"], all the ferries moved as they pleased and fired indiscriminately. The battle order could be restored only after 5 hours. "
            © Report of the Nord group "On the conduct of hostilities on Lake Ladoga". Translation from German

            And the Finns from the naval forces of the Luftwaffe on Ladoga were left with horns and legs.
            As a result, the Finns got two unarmed transport ferries and four landing boats, of which a company of patrol ships was formed in 1943.
      2. +1
        21 December 2021 12: 21
        Quote: Crowe
        Before the advent of German ferries, the Finns fought something like this.

        And they constantly cried about the lack of strength. smile
        The defense of Ladoga consists mainly of artillery located on the coast and islands, the basis of which is 120-150 mm guns. Mobile naval forces are negligible due to the small number of ships. The Ladoga coastal brigade has absolutely no ships and aircraft suitable for conducting offensive operations.

        Along the way, frightening the command of the innumerable enemy forces (our LF).
        The enemy has at least 100 ships in southern Ladoga, not counting barges and similar ships, more detailed information about which is given in Appendix 1. The Ladoga Russian flotilla includes two divisions of gunboats (1st and 2nd KL battalions), group patrol ships (SKR), the 6th minesweeper division, in which there are three groups of minesweepers, the Komsomolets floating base, MO boats, of which at least two dozen are known.
        In addition to this, there is a specially armed transport flotilla, tugs, 3 units of training ships and 4 units of hydrographic ones. The flagship of the Ladoga flotilla is the S-class destroyer "Purga". Of these ships, at least gunboats, of which there are definitely 8 pieces, and also with a guarantee, most of the tugs, of which there are at least 17 pieces, are able to navigate in ice. Gunboats and tugs can confidently break hard transparent ice with a thickness of 15-20 cm, but when it is weak, it is much thicker.
        © Sergey Barkalov's website. Pages of history. Explanatory note on the situation on Lake Ladoga dated April 2, 1942. Translation from Finnish

        And here is what the Germans wrote about the naval forces on Ladoga:
        Our strengths:

        Finnish:
        1 torpedo boat, with 1.8 inoperative
        1 steamer 350 t, 8 knots, 1x40 mm, 2 machine guns

        German:
        4 boats KM
        21 ferries Siebel, of which:
        7 heavy ferries with 3x88 mm and 1x37 mm
        7 light ferries with 4x20 mm Fierling and 1x37 mm installations
        7 command, transport and hospital

        Italian:
        4 MAS boats with 2x450 mm torp., 1x20 mm
        © Report "On the conduct of hostilities on Lake Ladoga". Translation from German
  3. +7
    20 December 2021 12: 11
    near, presumably, torpedo boats G-5
    yes, not presumably, but they are the most)) The second on the right hike with the installation for launching PCs. By the way, there are such barges in WarThunder (I don't remember one modification or several) in the German fleet line
  4. +12
    20 December 2021 12: 18
    The small draft of the BDB (1,45 meters in the stern and 1 meter in the bow) was also an important plus, as it often made the barges practically invulnerable to torpedoes of Soviet submarines.
    And torpedoes of American PT bots.

    A formidable enemy - usually 2-3 American PT bots, under the cover of 3-4 British high-speed gunboats, piled on a German convoy at night, but if there was a BDB with 88 guns, and even blocked with concrete blocks, it all ended in a fierce battle and heavy losses for both sides.
    I recommend Leonard Reynolds "Gunboat 658". - fun reading:
    1. +12
      20 December 2021 12: 59
      Draft yes, at least you can hide in the reeds
      The standard armament of the German high-speed landing barges (Marine Fähr-Prähme - MFP) was supposed to include an 88 mm / 45 Ubk C / 32 gun on a standard submarine rig - such, for example, were installed on the famous "u-bots" of the VII series. However, there were not enough such weapons for everyone, so the Germans had to go to improvisation. However, they are no strangers ...

      One of the most common BDB guns used as the main caliber was the standard French 75-mm field gun of the 1897 model (Schneider-Creuzot SK / 97). We mounted it on a standard machine from Ubk C / 32:
      But sometimes the uttermost exotic was used - for example, the 75-mm field gun Feldkanone 1908 right on the wheeled carriage.
  5. +5
    20 December 2021 14: 05
    Our modern counterpart, it seems, are Project 21820 landing craft, but they have weak standard armament and no artillery.
    1. +4
      20 December 2021 14: 32
      Do you mean "dugong"? Yes, there, with a displacement almost equal to the German one (280 tons total), there is no artillery, there is only anti-aircraft weapons: 2 × 14,5 mm MTPU-1 and 8 Igla and Verba MANPADS.

      "Michman Lermontov"
      1. +8
        20 December 2021 14: 40
        The primitivism of the 14,5 mm MTPU machine gun mount is especially unacceptable. Shooting while standing, from a boat, without an electric drive and stabilizer, can hardly be effective.
        1. +5
          20 December 2021 15: 12
          In general, the Vladimirov machine gun is a very good machine, I tried it on the ZPU-4, but, as you rightly noted, with the deck swinging under your feet, the shooting accuracy will be awesome.
          1. +1
            21 December 2021 20: 35
            On such a rather large boat, it is quite possible to place a pair of 57-mm A-220M cannons, with the ability to conduct anti-aircraft fire.
            1. +1
              21 December 2021 20: 36
              That the Germans did, with their artillery, of course.
              1. 0
                21 December 2021 20: 44
                Landing boats "Dugong" are very promising vessels, their armament should be thought out, loading and unloading cranes-manipulators should be installed on the sides and launched into a large series. In the same Caspian flotilla there are artillery boats of little use, but there are not enough amphibious assault boats. And on the Black and Azov Seas they would look good.
  6. +4
    20 December 2021 21: 38
    They write that in 1922 the Italians bought two Elpidiphoras from the "Wrangelites" and, on the basis of their "research", developed and built their first landing ship "Adige" !!!
  7. +3
    20 December 2021 22: 08
    They knew how, and are able to build technically sophisticated ships.
  8. ban
    +3
    20 December 2021 22: 28
    Types А-С 41-43 years, 521 units, 155/220 tons, 10.5 knots, 1-75 or 1-37 mm; 1-2-20 mm;
    MZ-A and MZ-B - 24 units, built for the Italian fleet with Italian engines and weapons, captured in Sept. 43;
    Type D 43-45, 289 units, 168/239 tons, 10.3 knots, 1-75 or 88 mm; 1-37, 1-6 - 20 mm.
    Specialist. modifications:
    sanitary - 3
    tanker - 4
    floating workshop - 4
    obstacle breaker - 40
    submarine hunter - 1
    minelayer - 121
    artillery barge - 141
    OK. 400 t. Full, 8 knots, 2-88, 2x4-20 option 1 and plus 1-37 option 2, type A-C barges;
    type D 2-105 mm, 1-37 mm and 2x4-20 mm
    Of course, they were not on the lakes - the author confused the Siebel ferries.
  9. 0
    21 December 2021 16: 43
    They knew how, and are able to build technically sophisticated ships.

    There is nothing elaborate about barges. This is just an improvisation. The speed and seaworthiness are low, and as a scuffle of gunboats and minelayers they were used only because nothing better beat them.
    1. 0
      21 December 2021 20: 09
      These are well-thought-out ships, the defenders of Stalingrad were in short supply in 1942, for transporting equipment, supplying and delivering soldiers to the besieged city, and back to evacuate the wounded. And this is all under armor and with the possibility of fire support for the landing, and in addition to the capabilities of air defense.
  10. 0
    22 December 2021 12: 38
    Quote: Sergey Alexandrovich
    These are well-thought-out ships, the defenders of Stalingrad were in short supply in 1942, for transporting equipment, supplying and delivering soldiers to the besieged city, and back to evacuate the wounded. And this is all under armor and with the possibility of fire support for the landing, and in addition to the capabilities of air defense.

    The use of barges for fire support of the landing "under armor" and so on, is not a deliberate improvisation. They have a displacement like a river monitor, whose weapons, armor and seaworthiness are incomparably better. They are worse than armored boats. The Volga flotilla lacked monitors and armored boats, not barges.
    1. 0
      24 December 2021 23: 35
      Monitors do NOT have the best seaworthiness. And the armored boat (at least during the Second World War) is definitely no better than the BDB.
  11. 0
    12 February 2022 14: 40
    On Warspot, Andrey Kuznetsov has an excellent series of articles about the Anapa convoys, where BDB is in the "leading roles". They drank tons of blood from our grandfathers.