Military Review

The Zircon hypersonic missile launched as part of the test cycle hits a coastal target

66

Despite the start of mass production of the Zircon hypersonic missiles, the Ministry of Defense continues testing the latest missile. The next launch of the Zircon was carried out by the frigate Admiral Gorshkov. This was reported by the press service of the military department.


According to the report, the next launch of the Zircon hypersonic missile was carried out as part of the completion of the test cycle of a new weapons... The rocket was launched from the board of the frigate "Admiral Gorshkov", from the very beginning participating in the tests. The ship was at one of the sea ranges of the Northern fleet in the White Sea. Shooting was carried out at a coastal target, a rocket launched from a ship successfully hit the target at the Chizha training ground in the Arkhangelsk region.

According to the objective control data, the rocket flight corresponded to the specified parameters, the rocket confirmed the inherent characteristics. Ships and ships of the Belomorsk Naval Base were involved in the provision of firing and the closure of the area, as well as aviation Northern Fleet.


Earlier, the Ministry of Defense said that tests of the Zircon from a surface launch vehicle would continue, the two previous launches took place in November, both times against sea targets. The frigate of the Northern Fleet "Admiral Gorshkov" took part in the tests. Later, information appeared about the tests of "Zircon" from the board of the first standard missile carrier - the nuclear submarine "Perm" of the "Yasen-M" project. They are planned in 2024 or in the first half of 2025 and are associated not with the rocket itself, but with a modified design of the submarine.

The supply of Zircon hypersonic missiles for surface ships will begin next year after the missile is officially adopted, for submarine carriers - later, a source in the defense industry named 2025.
66 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Bear
    Bear 16 December 2021 12: 47
    +10
    Well, that's for sure - a powerful information attack on our "partners". Every day, then about Zircon.
    1. military_cat
      military_cat 16 December 2021 13: 05
      0
      Quote: Orso
      Well, that's for sure - a powerful information attack on our "partners". Every day, then about Zircon.

      Very similar to that. A summit with NATO countries on the "red lines" is just around the corner - let's see how impressed they are.
    2. Thrifty
      Thrifty 16 December 2021 14: 08
      +1
      Whatever some members of the forum did not write on the forum, Zircon was clearly successful, and now they are clearly bringing to mind the missile guidance system on the target, so that it was possible to hit the target without reducing the missile's flight speed, on hypersound.
  2. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 16 December 2021 12: 55
    +3
    They informed me in a streamlined way. Not a word about the launch range, flight parameters ... everything is normal ... So maybe you don't need to "strip" in public? A half-naked blade seems more dangerous tongue
    1. Cb master
      Cb master 16 December 2021 13: 17
      -6
      What is there to expose? There was not a single photo of her flying, and this is the most interesting laughing Only launches, but at this stage it is no different from calibers.
      1. slipped
        slipped 16 December 2021 13: 34
        +7
        Quote: CB Master
        What is there to expose? There was not a single photo of her flying, and this is the most interesting laughing Only launches, but at this stage it is no different from calibers.


        And her appearance is classified. So that they do not copy everything to anyone. If something similar appears for others, it will be declassified.

        Earlier, why was the same "Onyx" declassified? We tried to make money on exports. Now with "Zircon" this is not yet required, for it is the same in the world.
      2. Serge-667
        Serge-667 16 December 2021 13: 39
        -6
        So there is no photo of the flight of tank shells either. Something tells me that Zircon is the same blank, no matter where to fly.
        1. 1976AG
          1976AG 16 December 2021 14: 58
          +3
          "So there is no photo of the flight of tank shells either"

          There are also photos and videos.
        2. Lena Petrova
          Lena Petrova 16 December 2021 19: 20
          -1
          Zircon flies 2-3 times faster than the projectile.
          1. Serge-667
            Serge-667 16 December 2021 19: 31
            -3
            Well, the starting projectile is about Mach 6. Quite a hypersound))
            But not the point. If Zircon is equally shot at stationary coastal objects and at moving sea objects, then there is no need to talk about a guidance system in flight. It is possible to simply correct the trajectory. But then interesting conclusions emerge, which I will not say).
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. Recoil
              Recoil 17 December 2021 17: 50
              -1
              Start - 1,780 km / s, i.e. less than 1,5 Max
              1. Serge-667
                Serge-667 17 December 2021 19: 18
                0
                Start - 1,780 km / s, i.e. less than 1,5 Max


                how would it be ... the dimensions m / s and km / s will you correlate yourself?
            3. EMMM
              EMMM 17 December 2021 23: 34
              0
              Where is such a gun with a speed of 2000 m / s at the barrel cut?
              1. Serge-667
                Serge-667 18 December 2021 00: 19
                -1
                Where is such a gun with a speed of 2000 m / s at the barrel cut?




                No problem))
              2. mmaxx
                mmaxx 18 December 2021 09: 42
                0
                F tank laughing
                Smoothbore
      3. Vladimir 290
        Vladimir 290 16 December 2021 13: 42
        +9
        Yes everything is correct. And cartoons are still showing and the Crimean bridge was drawn. But in Ukraine, the military-industrial complex is working at all, only the truth is that all over the world the decommissioned weapons have to be begged
      4. Cb master
        Cb master 16 December 2021 21: 00
        -1
        ahah, even wondering why there are so many minuses, for what I wanted to see how it flies?
        laughing Topvar guarding the secrets of the Motherland good
        1. And Us Rat
          And Us Rat 17 December 2021 00: 27
          +1
          Quote: CB Master
          ahah, even wondering why there are so many minuses, for what I wanted to see how it flies?

          Doubt is not allowed, the authorities are supposed to take their word for it. stop
      5. And Us Rat
        And Us Rat 17 December 2021 00: 31
        +1
        Quote: CB Master
        There was not a single photo of her flying, and this is the most interesting

        There is evidence, but they will not be shown to you, because they are secret. yes
    2. mark1
      mark1 16 December 2021 13: 55
      +3
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Not a word about the launch range,

      Well, here everything is simple - the distance of Arkhangelsk-Chizha is 333 km, that is, from the farthest corner of the White Sea, about 400 km is obtained, no more
      1. Romario_Argo
        Romario_Argo 16 December 2021 14: 01
        0
        an urgent question, when along a low-altitude trajectory Zircon is bent
        as I understand it,
        that due to the low ESR, the Berkov sm-radars will see the Zircon only 20 km away.
        at a speed of Zircon under 2 km / s. and issuance of CU Aegis - 8 sec.
        in the remainder of 2 seconds
        but this is already a distance of 4 km, with 5 km of the dead zone of Aegis with SAM-6, SM-3, SM-2
        1. just exp
          just exp 16 December 2021 14: 08
          +3
          he is unlikely to be able to at low altitude.
          there the air density is different, and therefore the scramjet will not work there as it is designed for other conditions.
          and the case is also not made of Vibranium, it is unlikely to withstand such loads at long distances
        2. mark1
          mark1 16 December 2021 14: 14
          +4
          Quote: Romario_Argo
          low-altitude trajectory Zircon

          To be honest, I have little idea of ​​a low-altitude trajectory at a speed of 8M. And about EPR in plasma ... probably someday they will tell.
        3. 2 Level Advisor
          2 Level Advisor 16 December 2021 14: 16
          +1
          I agree with everything, except for this, where did you get 20 km, and not, for example, 1 km?
          1. Romario_Argo
            Romario_Argo 16 December 2021 14: 28
            -3
            where did you get 20 km, and not, for example, 1 km?

            radio horizon for:
            AN / SPS49 (V) 9 = 35 km
            SPY-1D = 45 km
            - for low-flying targets with EPR 0,1 sq.m.
            Let's take an average of 40 km.
            EPR of Zircon 0,001 sq. M., Cuts the detection distance by a multiple of 2 = 20 km.
            and if for garlic - I just didn't dramatize
            then the remainder of 10 km is just a suicide of the US Navy
            they will see Zircons faster with optical systems than with radars
            1. Turbo3000
              Turbo3000 16 December 2021 14: 53
              -3
              You have been fermenting on patriotic forums for years, so you don't understand how hypersonic weapons work.
              A hypersonic rocket reaches Mach 5 only in the stratosphere, the scramjet engine does not work in dense layers, so the rocket turns into a falling warhead, which, when entering dense layers, loses speed many times due to resistance, look at the face of a parachutist who receives resistance

              And if the target moves, then the warhead will have to make a braking maneuver to obtain a flat profile, otherwise the warhead will not have sufficient control due to the high pressure, which will make the correction rudders practically useless. At a recent conference on US hypersound, the speakers unanimously stated that the best proto-interaction with hypersonic weapons is a change of position, in which case the hypersonic weapons will lose energy to obtain a shallow profile.
              Vertical dive is used only against stationary targets.
              The density of water is 800 times higher than the density of air, so speeds are even lower under water.
              For example, in space there is zero pressure, there is no resistance, therefore there are maximum speeds, BECAUSE of this there are so many craters on the moon, objects do not slow down and hit the surface of the moon max. speed.
              [Center]

              How long will the US have to recapture Zircon? About 2-3 minutes, the speed of the Zircon warhead drops to a low subsonic target.
              “We can protect our forces from hypersonic threats now, because such threats exist now,” US Vice Admiral John Hill.
              And in Russia, the public came up with stories about an invulnerable weapon, "the killer of aircraft carriers", but this is all a complete jingoistic illiterate biliberd.
              1. just exp
                just exp 16 December 2021 15: 26
                0
                You yourself do not know everything, but there is braking when entering dense layers, but this braking is leveled by the engine at the last impulse with a more or less vertical dive, Iskander and Dagger will slow down to 700ms and this despite the fact that it flies in dense layers almost from a third of the trajectory, if Zircon has an air intake, then he will add another second to the engine.
                with a vertical dive, they just break through the missile defense of ships, because they have a radar funnel at the very top, because the radar does not shine directly above them.
                correction can be done not only with rudders but also with gas-dynamic engines
                and can beat Zircon at full speed.
                here everyone has a question only in the method of guidance.
                because thermal imaging and optical because of the plasma will hardly work, and radar guidance is susceptible to interference, and given that plasma blocks the main methods of operation of the radar mode, only a few remain (ours have learned to use plasma as an antenna, but frequencies and so on are unknown and it is not a fact that it is resistant to electronic warfare ) limiting the form of its use.
                1. Turbo3000
                  Turbo3000 16 December 2021 15: 49
                  +1
                  The GVPRD engine does not operate below nominal altitudes, the air intake design is not capable of this. The scramjet has a supersonic flow, and for dense layers it is necessary to design an air intake with a subsonic flow of incoming air, which is in the scramjet-Onyx.
                  In the United States, a hybrid scramjet engine is being developed, which can have a variable air intake design during flight, in a patent of NPO Mashinostroeniya (developer of Zircon) they called such an engine unrealizable due to the small dimensions of the rocket. This type of engine has not even been implemented yet on hypersonic aircraft, where there is more space inside.
                  Vertical diving is effective only against stationary ships, the pressure is so high that any rudders are practically useless, moreover, the rocket can generally lose control from overloads and fall apart in the air from vibrations, therefore, the NPO Mash patent indicates that the hypersonic warhead will have a vertical dive only with altitude 4000m.
                  1. just exp
                    just exp 17 December 2021 04: 58
                    -2
                    Why is there an air intake design? the flight speed and, accordingly, the air intake will be hypersonic, here the only problem is that the air density increases and the load on the structure and the pressure inside the engine increase accordingly, which is why, yes, the engine will no longer work on the lowest layers, but it will lose speed with heights of about 15-20 km, and if Iskander, due to its trajectory, which by a third in dense layers, loses its speed from 7M to 2M, then Zircon when diving and having a speed of 8M if it slows down to speeds of 5-6M, which is still high speed for the missile defense of the ship and the radar station of the attacked ship does not see because the anti-ship missile system will be in the radar funnel.
                    vertical dive is effective against moving ships, because the dive itself will take about 10-12 seconds and believe me, the ship will not go far in these 10-12 seconds.
                    and as I already wrote, you can steer not only with rudders, but also with gas-dynamic engines that are even used on MD SAMs.
                    and Zircon is fine with the strength of materials, so it is not just a hypersonic anti-ship missile system, but also a maneuvering hypersonic one. and maneuvers can be carried out not only at height.
                2. The comment was deleted.
              2. Vladimir_2U
                Vladimir_2U 16 December 2021 15: 59
                +4
                Quote: Turbo3000
                About 2-3 minutes, the speed of the Zircon warhead drops to a low subsonic target.


                It's a pity Mosquitoes and Volcanoes and Onyxes did not read this and hit targets at 2-3 speeds of sound!

                LOL
                1. Turbo3000
                  Turbo3000 16 December 2021 16: 11
                  -1
                  Mosquitoes and Onyxes have a working motor all the time, so the loss of kinetic energy is compensated for. Hypersonic rockets do not have an engine in the terminal section, so their terminal section is slower.
                  Zircon will never replace Onyx
                  The American X-51 hypersonic missile, which developed a speed of 5 mach, to the terminal section - the descent to the target took 193 seconds, more than three minutes
                  1. Vladimir_2U
                    Vladimir_2U 16 December 2021 16: 28
                    -2
                    Quote: Turbo3000
                    Mosquitoes and Onyxes have a working motor all the time, so the loss of kinetic energy is compensated for. Hypersonic rockets do not have an engine in the terminal section, so their terminal section is slower.

                    Has Putin personally reported this to you? laughing What nonsense it is to imagine that if the Americans do not have something, then no one else has it.

                    Quote: Turbo3000
                    The American X-51 hypersonic missile, which developed a speed of 5 mach, to the terminal section - the descent to the target took 193 seconds, more than three minutes
                    And it is also nonsense to think that an experimental unsuccessful missile of 8 years ago is equal to a missile practically put into service.
                  2. just exp
                    just exp 17 December 2021 05: 02
                    0
                    The American X-51 hypersonic missile, which developed a speed of 5 mach, to the terminal section - the descent to the target took 193 seconds, more than three minutes

                    from a height of 18 km 193 seconds? less than 100m sec?
                    Are they BB on a parachute or something?
                2. The comment was deleted.
                3. mmaxx
                  mmaxx 18 December 2021 09: 47
                  +1
                  We all understand not only secret hypersound (everything is simple there!), But also viruses, politics and even football. Although about football, it seems, is already all.
                  laughing
                  Another would be to calculate how much time is needed to change this very position. And to understand how long it takes to change the angular velocity, and how much for the linear one.
                  1. Vladimir_2U
                    Vladimir_2U 18 December 2021 16: 07
                    -1
                    Quote: mmaxx
                    We all understand not only the secret hypersound (everything is simple there!)

                    Yes, it is enough to remember the approximate characteristics of already operating samples.
              3. Alexey Sommer
                Alexey Sommer 16 December 2021 16: 52
                -2
                Quote: Turbo3000
                And in Russia, the public came up with stories about an invulnerable weapon, "the killer of aircraft carriers", but this is all a complete jingoistic illiterate biliberd.

                Try to dodge a projectile that travels at 1 m / s (900m) and is still slightly controlled.
                It is no less difficult for a ship to maneuver, and maybe even more, this colossus weighing several thousand tons moves in a given direction and has colossal inertia, this is not a buggy for you.
              4. guerilla707
                guerilla707 17 December 2021 14: 58
                -1
                Let's goodbye\\\
              5. BastaKarapuzik And
                BastaKarapuzik And 18 December 2021 10: 24
                0
                There are also problems with shooting down a conventional supersonic missile.
                The Americans were shooting down on exercises recently, but how did they do it?
                The ship that shot down received target designation from another ship, due to this, the missile was detected earlier, and the air defense systems had time to react.
                In real combat, of course, things won't be so easy. And if one ships gave another control point, then who will warn this first ship about the attack?
                In general, war is a very unpredictable thing, especially when the flight time is shorter and shorter.
        4. bayard
          bayard 16 December 2021 15: 29
          +5
          Quote: Romario_Argo
          a pressing question when, along a low-altitude trajectory, Zircon

          A low-altitude trajectory is technically impossible for him. And physically - there are no such materials. Therefore, the MiG-25 \ 31, when flying in supersonic, climbed / climbed 20 km. And at low altitude, their speed is no more than 1500 km / h.
          Quote: Romario_Argo
          that due to the low EPR, Berkov's sm-radars will see Zircon only 20 km away

          They will be able to see perfectly well over 600 kilometers - at their echelon and thanks to the plasma cocoon (if they really form it, it all depends on the flight altitude).
          Quote: Romario_Argo
          at a speed of Zircon under 2 km / s. and issuance of CU Aegis - 8 sec.

          But what difference does it make in these seconds, if there is simply nothing to hit the Zircon with on that echelon - the Americans do not have such missiles, for such echelons. And it will attack from a sheer dive into a dead funnel.
          And if you really want to emerge from under the horizon at supersonic speed, that is, "Caliber" with a supersonic second stage - it will sneak up on the PMA and enter the zone of visibility of the ship's radar at supersonic speed.
          Or "Onyx" - it can be at low altitude, but with a much shorter range and lower speed.
          1. Osipov9391
            Osipov9391 16 December 2021 18: 19
            +3
            Hawkeye will see this missile 600-700 km from the AUG warrant. And this is if we are allowed to let her in - the carrier will be allowed at such a distance. Although anti-ship missiles in practice are not allowed further than 200-250 km. There is a risk that it will not reach. And external target designation will be needed.
            To classify a warrant and identify an aircraft carrier.
            Do not forget that there are very powerful electronic warfare systems on the escort ships. They can extinguish the heads of any anti-ship missiles.
            1. bayard
              bayard 16 December 2021 23: 33
              +1
              Quote: Osipov9391
              Hawkeye will see this missile 600-700 km from the AUG warrant.

              Yes, he and any Aegis cruiser / destroyer at such an altitude and range will be able to detect.
              Quote: Osipov9391
              And this is if we are allowed to let her in - the carrier will be allowed at such a distance.

              The surface ship may not be allowed, but the SSGN can quite get close. And he will fire a volley. Any of the "Ash" or a modernized "Baton" can become such. And so is the air carrier. With an air start, the range of the GZUR will be greater, and the "Path" will pave the way.
              Quote: Osipov9391
              There is a risk that it will not reach.

              It is still necessary to learn how to shoot down, until they can.
              Quote: Osipov9391
              Do not forget that there are very powerful electronic warfare systems on the escort ships. They can extinguish the heads of any anti-ship missiles.

              And the anti-ship missiles have one (or more) guidance channel - just for the RT-signature, so that the activity of their electronic warfare will become just a "beacon" for guidance.
              Our anti-ship missiles always do this.
              1. Osipov9391
                Osipov9391 17 December 2021 00: 25
                0
                A salvo of SSGNs, even from a good distance, will be possible only if they do not run into the hunters. They are part of the AUG and can be carried out for a hundred or two miles.
                Then the anti-submarine corridor will be made for the AUG by anti-submarine aircraft from coastal airfields. Like Poseidon. And not alone.
                And the air carriers have no chance at all to bring the missile to the AUG. Hawkeye will find them 600-800 km away from the order and point a pair on duty at them that patrols in the air at a distance of 500-700 km from the AUG.
                An exception can be if there are several dozen carriers. Well, in that case, the prey will probably be the escort ships.
                1. bayard
                  bayard 17 December 2021 16: 32
                  +2
                  Single aircraft will definitely not attack the AUG, but anti-ship missiles for them already have a range of about 1000 km. Onyx-M has a range of up to 800 km from a land / sea launch. , and in the aerial version it will be slightly more. On the way, an airborne missile defense system with a range of 1000+ will work out, I don’t know, but work is underway. And the same Su-34M will be able to carry such a GZUR more than one. Like Onyx.
                  If nuclear weapons and the Pathway program are used, then all air patrols will simply fall into the water, and new ones will not rise. A corridor (Trail) will be laid and targets will be hit.
                  One modernized "Baton" will be able to launch 48 "Onyxes" or "Zircons" in one salvo. This is enough for any AUG. Even without YABC.
                  Quote: Osipov9391
                  Then the anti-submarine corridor will be made for the AUG by anti-submarine aircraft from coastal airfields. Like Poseidon. And not alone.

                  They will do that, only without air cover at a distance of 800 - 1000 km. , they will become easy prey for our heavy fighters, which will also be cleaning and laying.
                  In any case, in a war - it's all a matter of chance. But within the framework of the pattern.
          2. And Us Rat
            And Us Rat 17 December 2021 00: 50
            +3
            Quote: bayard
            Americans do not have such missiles, for such echelons

            RIM-161SM-3 Block IIA
            Rocket speed 4,5-5,0 km / s
            Maximum range 2500 km
            The height of the affected area is 1500 km

            On December 11, 2003, a target was shot down from the cruiser USS Lake Erie at an altitude of 133 nautical miles (247 km) with a total approach speed of 36.667 km / h (more than 10 km / s).

            On February 21, 2008, the SM-3 rocket was launched from the cruiser USS Lake Erie in the Pacific Ocean and three minutes after the launch hit the USA-247 emergency reconnaissance satellite located at an altitude of 193 kilometers, moving at a speed of 7 580 m / s (27 300 km / h).
            1. bayard
              bayard 17 December 2021 16: 45
              -2
              This rocket takes targets in space - at an altitude of over 100 km. , and "Zircon" runs at an altitude of 30 - 40 - up to 50 km. , where conventional missiles are ALREADY ineffective and will not take such a target, and SM-3 Block-2A cannot yet, because there is still an atmosphere and its seeker is closed by a fairing.
              Against such GZUR will have to compose a completely new missile ... the United States will have to. And in our country even the S-400 could do this from the very beginning.
              Therefore, the confusion in the chicken coop.
              Of course, they will invent countermeasures, but it will take a lot of time. And funds.
              1. And Us Rat
                And Us Rat 17 December 2021 20: 01
                +1
                Take the trouble to back up your claims with factual sources. So far it looks like your personal opinion.
                1. bayard
                  bayard 18 December 2021 00: 16
                  0
                  See for yourself the American transatmospheric interceptor and the design of its warhead. Pay attention WHEN the head fairing is dropped - at what height. Then compare this altitude and the flight altitude of the Zircon.
                  I think you will make the conclusions yourself.

                  If the United States did not have the problem of intercepting this type of missile, there would be no such unrest. They are quite capable of making such an interceptor, but it will take time, decent money and the efforts of many specialized specialists. And it won't be cheap.
                  I am not a fan of throwing caps into the air after the statements of the domestic press - I trust them no more than foreign ones. So "Zircon" has yet to prove its compliance with the declared characteristics. And if he has already proved the speed and altitude, then he has not yet demonstrated the declared range. 450 km. , this is not 1000+ in the mouth of the Guarantor. Also raise questions about the ability to hit a moving sea target. But if he really turns out to be as promised, the available means will not bring him down.
                  And new ones - capable of shooting down, still have to appear.
                  1. And Us Rat
                    And Us Rat 18 December 2021 00: 59
                    +1
                    Quote: bayard
                    Pay attention WHEN the head fairing is reset

                    So show me when. request
                    Do you have a source of this data?

                    Quote: bayard
                    And if he has already proven the speed and altitude

                    Where and when? Apart from vague statements in the media, I personally have not found anything.
                    No launch range in numbers, no flight time, nothing.
                    It looks strange. Usually they either brag about the parameters if they are going to export. Or they are generally silent, if it is secret. And to take the position - "We have them, but we will not show them to you, because they are secret" ... does it remind you of anything?
            2. mmaxx
              mmaxx 18 December 2021 09: 52
              0
              The satellite is the most predictable target.
        5. And Us Rat
          And Us Rat 17 December 2021 00: 35
          0
          Quote: Romario_Argo
          only 20 km.

          Quote: Romario_Argo
          under 2 km / s

          Quote: Romario_Argo
          issuance of TSU Aegis - 8 sec

          Quote: Romario_Argo
          at 5 km dead zone

          Where do all these numbers come from? Share the source?
        6. EMMM
          EMMM 17 December 2021 23: 38
          0
          Where did you get 2 km / s from?
          All the media are talking about 10000 km / h, that is, about 8M at an altitude of about 130-140 km.
          1. And Us Rat
            And Us Rat 18 December 2021 01: 09
            0
            Quote: EMMM
            All the media are talking about 10000 km / h, that is, about 8M at an altitude of about 130-140 km.

            That is, at the peak of the ballistic trajectory? Well, that, in principle, was expected. Such "hypersonic" weapons have existed since the days of the V-2 (M = 4 + at an altitude of 88 km), and are produced even in such technologically backward countries as Iran.
            1. The comment was deleted.
      2. tralflot1832
        tralflot1832 16 December 2021 14: 46
        0
        And if so Belomorsk m Kanin Nos in a straight line 610 km. There is practically nothing on the Chizha test site, unlike the Kura test site, the target field can not even be found. All based on satellite images in the public domain.
      3. Serge-667
        Serge-667 16 December 2021 19: 32
        0
        Well, everything is simple - the distance is Arkhangelsk-Chizha ..


        Shh !!!
    3. Ross xnumx
      Ross xnumx 16 December 2021 14: 40
      0
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      So maybe you don't need to "strip" in public? A half-naked blade seems more dangerous

      It all depends on the audience. May be so:
  3. Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov
    Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov 16 December 2021 13: 10
    +3
    ***
    You see flew by
    An asterisk rocket
    And this is a good omen ...
    ***
  4. vervolk
    vervolk 16 December 2021 13: 12
    -1
    from so, ahead of everyone. then we are doing everything right!
  5. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 16 December 2021 13: 42
    -2
    It's time to move on to the next level of trolling. A nuclear-powered rocket Petrel, Poseidon can surface in front of tourists at the North Pole, and then return to the base.
  6. Nikolaevich I
    Nikolaevich I 16 December 2021 13: 46
    +1
    Hypersonic missile "Zircon" hit the coastal target Some joke remembered ... "Let the first wish of the first person who left the cabin on the deck come true ...! The boatswain leaves in the morning ..." Eh, anchor in my cra ... aaaaaaa ...! "... .. repeat
    1. Barberry25
      Barberry25 16 December 2021 14: 07
      -2
      Hello to the Japanese called .. it will be very interesting if on the eve of the summit of some thread of ours they shoot at 1 km ...
  7. Ros 56
    Ros 56 16 December 2021 13: 55
    0
    I wonder how the rocket starts from the side of the sea-okiyana, and even hypersonic, but flies to land. Does anyone have any associations? I like this. good
  8. Engineer Schukin
    Engineer Schukin 16 December 2021 14: 39
    -11
    Quote: Thrifty
    Whatever some members of the forum did not write on the forum, Zircon was clearly successful, and now they are clearly bringing to mind the missile guidance system on the target, so that it was possible to hit the target without reducing the missile's flight speed, on hypersound.

    I believe in it too!
    In principle, I believe most of all what I know nothing about and which I have never seen.

    It and d ... will believe if, for example, it sees hundreds of su-57 armatures in their real existence and quantity, but you believe in something fantastic, the most deadly and effective, but what you saw only in cartoons and newspaper headlines ... This requires a special faith, patriotic. We patriots have this. That is why we are strong and unshakable!
  9. ugol2
    ugol2 16 December 2021 15: 50
    +11
    I watched the video of the Zircon launch.
    I remembered K. Malevich's painting "Blacks are loading coal on a dark night"
    Secrecy-smiling.
  10. Sergei Zabelin
    Sergei Zabelin 16 December 2021 16: 25
    0
    Quote: Engineer Shchukin
    In principle, I believe most of all what I know nothing about and which I have never seen.

    well, ask our partners, all launches are tracked, hence the silence from them
  11. Sergei Zabelin
    Sergei Zabelin 16 December 2021 16: 43
    0
    Quote: Turbo3000
    The American X-51 hypersonic missile, which developed a speed of 5 mach, to the terminal section - the descent to the target took 193 seconds, more than three minutes


    yes, yes, yes, we know this during the third flight when it collapsed in the air, from a height of 18000 meters a simple brick will fall for three minutes
  12. faterdom
    faterdom 17 December 2021 00: 00
    0
    Quote: CB Master
    What is there to expose? There was not a single photo of her flying, and this is the most interesting laughing Only launches, but at this stage it is no different from calibers.

    It will be possible to see only the subscriber. Within reach. But not for long, so that he did not have time to draw, or at least tell.
  13. AAC
    AAC 17 December 2021 09: 45
    0
    Training launches are also done in order to develop tactics of use. I think there will be paired launches on nearby targets soon.