Lukashenko announced the preservation of launch sites for ICBMs on the territory of Belarus

80

Belarus retained all but one ICBM launch pad. This was stated by the President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko.

Lukashenko, who earlier announced his readiness to deploy Russian nuclear missiles on the territory of the republic in the event of the appearance of American ones in Poland, announced the readiness of launch sites for ICBMs. According to him, despite the pressure from Europe and the United States, he managed to keep all sites except one, which had to be blown up "for the Americans."



The Belarusian president stressed that in the 90s he was strongly pressured by Yeltsin, who demanded to "blow up" all sites for the deployment of mobile complexes of Topol ICBMs, but he did not go for it. That is why, according to him, Lukashenka is considered an enemy in the West.

Why did I become an enemy of the West? Not because I'm a dictator. Because all the sites on which Topol stood, except one, are completely preserved and are still ready for use.

- said Lukashenko.

During the Soviet era, mobile complexes of Topol ICBMs were located on the territory of Belarus, for which special sites and shelters were made in the Belarusian forests, there were no mining installations in Belarus. In addition, there were more than a thousand tactical nuclear charges in the republic, which were withdrawn after the collapse of the Soviet Union under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear weapons.

For our part, we note that for modern mobile ground-based missile systems (PGRK) "Yars", which replaced the mobile complexes "Topol" and "Topol-M", a special platform for launching missiles is not required, but the preserved infrastructure can significantly simplify the deployment of complexes on territory of the republic.
80 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +18
    1 December 2021 19: 13
    And TNW will be enough.
    1. +26
      1 December 2021 19: 40
      I am glad about the change of the vector, the neighbor has decided.
      Not a trace of "multi-vector" is left! For the best, Russia is definitely a plus.
      Neither economics, nor politics, nor friendship could change Lukashenka's attitude towards Russia and the West. But personal grievances and ambitions - please!

      And about the positions for the missiles - great. They will come in handy in a threatened period, thanks to him for his foresight.
      1. +18
        1 December 2021 19: 51
        Quote: RealPilot
        I am glad about the change of the vector, the neighbor has decided.

        If you want to live, you will change everything except gender.
        1. +8
          1 December 2021 20: 44
          Minusanul apparently wanting to change the sex?
          wassat
          1. +9
            1 December 2021 20: 45
            Quote: Cheshire
            Minusanul apparently wanting to change the sex?

            I also whinnied when I saw the minus.
          2. -3
            1 December 2021 22: 50
            Another tally of pluses and minuses. And not our army for this?
            1. +5
              2 December 2021 09: 32
              Quote: mitrich
              Another tally of pluses and minuses. And not our army for this?

              Our army is deep, Anatoly. As for the AHL, I, like you, am wary. You sir, unfortunately, did not grasp the meaning of my commentary.
              hi
              1. -1
                2 December 2021 19: 46
                Well done Old Man! Thrifty! And prudent! laughing
        2. -16
          1 December 2021 22: 49
          This one, if necessary, will change both gender and orientation. Everything for my son Kolya.
        3. -8
          2 December 2021 00: 00
          I think it will be necessary, Batko and the gender will change. He has no faith .. Today the wind is blowing in the direction of Russia and it is all so all-Russian. Tomorrow the wind will change to the West and Lukashenka will change his clothes right in the air.
        4. +1
          2 December 2021 06: 18
          winked The floor can be rebuilt too!
      2. 0
        2 December 2021 12: 18
        Quote: RealPilot
        The change of the vector pleases me.

        And about the positions for the missiles - great. They will come in handy in a threatened period, thanks to him for his foresight.

        Those positions are only on paper positions. Was on this once.
    2. +1
      1 December 2021 19: 50
      Quote: SKVichyakow
      And TNW will be enough.

      For Poland, even a lot, and for ..... how they will behave.
    3. +6
      1 December 2021 20: 49
      Quote: SKVichyakow
      And TNW will be enough

      Absolutely. Iskander there. And a military base. For videoconferencing. And not only.
    4. KCA
      +10
      2 December 2021 03: 45
      Even excessively, the number of TNW has never been calculated by anyone, and since the times of the USSR, SBCs have been everywhere with a caliber of 152mm (I don’t know here, or maybe 125mm), shells, mines, missiles, air defense missiles, missile defense, anti-ship missiles, anti-ship missiles, well where in terms of mass and size they were placed everywhere, the iksperds estimate, by their inventions, the number of tactical charges in Russia from 6000 to 16, and the hell knows it, maybe 000 easily, no one will ever know anything about the factories for the refurbishment of charges, even in the presence of a friend of all friends Yeltsin, they were able to keep silent about a lot from this p-p, my friend served in the mountain, where in 32-000 the trains simply left, and they left that, why, even he did not know, they just went uphill to the depths and that's it , he went on guard at -1992 meters, but did not know what was lower
  2. 0
    1 December 2021 19: 19
    Lukashenko announced the preservation of launch sites for ICBMs on the territory of Belarus
    Good for you! soldier Thank you for keeping the ICBM launch sites safe. There are no superfluous ICBMs. Do you know the agreement. Yes, and it will be more difficult to protect Alexander Grigorievich from you than from NATO saboteurs. Nothing personal. Only practicality. And sound calculation. hi
  3. +16
    1 December 2021 19: 20
    Well, this is said too loudly, although military units, more precisely, what is left of them with missile silos in our forests really is. True, everything is shattered there, but theoretically, if you invest a penny and wave a shovel, you can restore it.
    1. +1
      1 December 2021 19: 43
      The mines were flooded, and the platforms and concrete roads were preserved.
      1. +18
        1 December 2021 19: 53
        For the gifted, there were no mine launchers in Belarus, but what is blocked is storage
        1. +3
          1 December 2021 20: 02
          Three missile divisions were on the "Pioneers" of the mine type, and then there was a rearmament on the mobile "Topol".
          1. +7
            1 December 2021 20: 07
            In the Gomel region, the pioneers were based and were solid fuel and mobile, actually
            1. +5
              1 December 2021 20: 21
              This was already at the end of the 70s, when the Mozyr division was transferred to the Vinnitsa army of the RVSN. There, and tests of the mobile Pioneer were carried out. And the mines from under R 12 were decommissioned.
        2. The comment was deleted.
          1. +1
            1 December 2021 20: 44
            You seem to be from the Gomel region. There is still no exact information about what was stored at the arsenal in Zakopytye. But the chief had a general's position.
            1. +7
              1 December 2021 20: 54
              The person above just blinked something. The mines in Smorgon and Postavy remained from the R-12 and R-14 missiles, which were then cut, and he proves that there was nothing there, but there were supposedly only mobile carriers. Well, they were, but only then to replace those that were based in the mines. [Media = https: //realt.onliner.by/2015/11/30/rvsn]
              1. +4
                1 December 2021 21: 17
                Well, the comrade was not entirely in the know. Once, on the border of Minsk and Grodno regions, I caught crucian carp in a forest on a mine flooded with a rocket. The rocket was taken out at night in 1978. So it is still not clear whose it was. It is 20 km to Smorgon, but they said that the mine was not theirs. Well, the rockets were all under subscription, so there are still many secrets here. It's easier to look, if there is an airfield of an air defense regiment, it means that somewhere nearby there is an RVSN regiment.
              2. +4
                2 December 2021 00: 31
                A brother in the Union served there-p / o Myshanka, Petrikovsky district, Gomel region.
        3. +6
          2 December 2021 00: 08
          Were !!! Minsk region. Slutsk district, Pavlovka village. flooded. Now LTP is there.
    2. +11
      1 December 2021 20: 44
      I'll tell you a secret that there is a standard for the construction and restoration of such facilities for the engineering troops.
      But, I was not here and I did not say anything.)
    3. 0
      2 December 2021 03: 57
      It is a pity that the airbase in Bykhov was torn apart. I was there, in that year 1978 .. The military instructor took us there on an excursion.
      1. +1
        2 December 2021 11: 49
        The 120th division guarded the runway of this airfield for about 5 years, a special guard was created. And the band was unique. Unfortunately, it ALREADY was.
  4. +4
    1 December 2021 19: 23
    the correct move that you saved)
    1. +7
      1 December 2021 19: 41
      Quote: opuonmed
      the correct move that you saved)

      Business executive! But every dog ​​strove to bite - the collective farmer, the chairman of the collective farm! But hey, you kept everything, he drives the thieves away and in difficult times showed himself to be an ally! ..
  5. +13
    1 December 2021 19: 26
    Batka's rhetoric has changed. Previously, both ours and yours. And Crimea did not recognize. Without Russia, nowhere.
    1. +7
      1 December 2021 19: 33
      Quote: Alex013
      Batka's rhetoric has changed. Previously, both ours and yours. And Crimea did not recognize. Without Russia, nowhere.

      On the cabbage soup - heartburn from cutlets ...
    2. +7
      1 December 2021 20: 10
      So the chair one of the two disappeared, as it were. He grabbed the remaining one with a stranglehold. For the remaining one can kick someone))
    3. 0
      1 December 2021 22: 53
      This is not to be hoped for. At times, the landmarks and orientation will change.
    4. 0
      2 December 2021 11: 53
      Well, I had to run around with a gun myself, I smelled what "friendship" with the West smells like.
  6. +10
    1 December 2021 19: 29
    And the meaning of unfortified open positions with known coordinates? They will simply be the first to take out + pollution will be mainly surface and atmospheric - either a conventional weapon or an unconventional one. If on our territory we can still create a whole set of multilayer infrastructures and air defense missile defense systems to cover this, then on the Belarusian territory this will be equally impossible, or it will be tied to the "settlement of additional questions." And knowing our old friend LAG, we can assume that if we get into all this, he will use it as another lever of gentle pressure on us. The idea is generally stupid, although it sounds solid.
    1. -4
      1 December 2021 19: 36
      "And the meaning of unfortified open positions with known coordinates?"

      Why not fortified? )))
      Fortified air defense. Recent developments in air defense and ballistic missiles are capable of intercepting.
      1. +4
        1 December 2021 19: 56
        Deeply echeloned interception and considerable distances to our mines is one thing. Here there is both time to react and chances to thoroughly thin out the means of destruction on the approach, and finally, high-quality silos, for each of which the enemy will spend a lot of conventional means (if they do it). We also have the opportunity to place these silos in sparsely populated areas, if they are hit by conventional (or non-conventional) weapons, the scale of the ecological disaster will be incomparably smaller than in some Belovezhie.
        In the case of Blr, there will be no more or less adequate separation, no protection comparable to silos, no time for reaction, these positions can be obtained by conventional means, but the pollution from their defeat will already be nuclear, in the recreational ecological area. There would be a sense of such permutations if we were considering a "first strike" strategy, but at the moment we do not have all kinds of means for the success of such a strategy, and these positions would be useless positions, or positions for suicide bombers, in the event of a real conflict. In the case of some kind of demarche, it would be just a long-term burying of money into nowhere, completely divorced from real defense or security.
        1. -1
          1 December 2021 21: 36
          "It's one thing to intercept deeply and considerable distances to the mines with us. There is both time to react and chances to thoroughly thin out weapons on the approach, and finally high-quality silos, for each of which the enemy will spend a lot of conventional weapons."

          I was always so amused by opponents who reasoned at the level - the enemy would stand, and I would like to try on with a club, but I would stand on a chair to hit better, but as if I would hit on the head with a bat (and all this time the enemy will stand motionless and wait for him to be hit), yeah.)))
          Think about the words - for the first time it became possible to intercept all the ICBMs of the West. What an advantage Russia has now! Just imagine intercepting an ICBM at an altitude of 50-100km. Google about a high-altitude nuclear explosion (100 km) and its consequences and compare it with the effect of the Voevoda hitting the ground and its consequences.
  7. +6
    1 December 2021 19: 31
    In the 85th of the last century, the silos in Belarus were empty! Even then, the ICBMs were dismantled. Maybe something was preceded by this action? First-hand infa, urgent service 1985-87.
    1. 0
      1 December 2021 19: 37
      I think they were empty because of the GRU regiment O. Penkovsky, who sold many secrets of the USSR to the United States.
      1. +3
        1 December 2021 19: 55
        Penkovsky was shot in 63 ... However
  8. +2
    1 December 2021 19: 59
    The sites are valuable, but for Pioneer-class missiles.
    1. +4
      1 December 2021 20: 15
      "PionEry" (now let it be the RS-26 "Rubezh" with a heavy head) should be placed not in Belarus, but in Anadyr.
  9. +8
    1 December 2021 20: 10
    so in Belarus it makes sense to put tactical weapons, and strategic ones, as far as I understand, on the contrary, try to place them far from the enemy's missile defense system
    1. -3
      1 December 2021 20: 52
      so in Belarus it makes sense to put tactical weapons, and strategic ones, as far as I understand, on the contrary, try to place them far from the enemy's missile defense system
      Nothing. There is no sense in today's Belarus of nuclear weapons. Not in any sense. Only populist statements by Lukashenka. And the wishes of a crowd of overexcited marginals.
  10. +9
    1 December 2021 20: 34
    At the moment, Russia strictly adheres to the nuclear nonproliferation treaty. So, for missiles to appear on the territory of Belarus, Belarus needs to become a federal district of Russia.
  11. +3
    1 December 2021 20: 40
    To really get scared by Poland or Romania, it is not Yars that needs to be put to the dad, but tactical missiles with a range of 500-2000 km with nuclear warheads. Something like the former Pioneers. Then they will think about it. As far as I understand, Yars has a completely different ballistic flight path and can fly to the USA, but not to Poland ...
  12. +3
    1 December 2021 20: 45
    Once upon a time in Belarus, under each tree there was a rocket ...
  13. -3
    1 December 2021 21: 02
    A chatterbox, again fills himself with a price in front of Russia, it would be better to say when normal integration will take place (never ()
  14. +3
    1 December 2021 21: 19
    The old man was changed. Either he sat on "two chairs", then he gives out phrases and revelations about the Outskirts and the West that creep up the spine.
    1. +1
      1 December 2021 22: 33
      One chair was knocked out from under the ass.
  15. +8
    1 December 2021 21: 25
    krasava .. good news for us.
  16. +1
    1 December 2021 22: 07
    The Belarusian president stressed that in the 90s he was strongly pressured by Yeltsin, who demanded to "blow up" all sites for the deployment of mobile complexes of Topol ICBMs, but he didn't go for it.

    Well, who is he now after such a statement ... for liberals of all stripes? soldier
  17. -2
    1 December 2021 22: 11
    Lukashenka is strong in his unpredictability. He has already found those responsible for the migrant crisis. Here's a new twist.
    Among the organizers of the delivery of migrants to the border of Belarus were citizens of Russia, including Chechens. This was announced to RIA Novosti by Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko.

    “Private companies, taxis, buses. They hire our people and rushed there. But guides from Russia also worked here, and thanks to the Chechens - these are organized people. They were the most organized here, they organized the flow. They helped people from Minsk to get to the border, possibly to cross the border, ”Lukashenka said in an interview with journalist Dmitry Kiselev.
    1. +2
      1 December 2021 22: 32
      What is he accusing them of? On the contrary, it follows from your quote that he is grateful for the help.
      1. -4
        1 December 2021 22: 38
        this is not my quote.
        He has such sarcasm.
        https://t.me/rian_ru/132813
        In Europe, they are on their ears, who would have to roll in sanctions, and Lukashenka prompts.
        And it has nothing to do with it, it has nothing to do with it.
        1. +1
          1 December 2021 22: 54
          I watched Lukashenko's interview with Kiselyov, in his own words, he does not see any guilt for Belarus in relation to migrants and does not understand Poland's specific attitude to what is happening. It makes no sense to translate arrows in what he does not see a problem. And in general, he said, in my opinion, Old Man is already so much that no sanctions or new accusations touch him.
          1. -2
            1 December 2021 23: 33
            snippet of interview
            https://t.me/rian_ru/132813
            Of course he doesn't. He indicated in an interview who organized it. Belarus and he personally have nothing to do with it.
            1. +1
              1 December 2021 23: 37
              Quote: Avior
              snippet of interview

              Smiled)
            2. 0
              2 December 2021 01: 33
              Watch the interview in full, Lukashenka, in principle, does not see a problem in this situation with migrants, it doesn’t matter that Belarus has anything to do with it or has nothing to do with it.
              1. 0
                2 December 2021 07: 31
                He does not see or hear that there is only talk in Europe about this, what about the next sanctions?
                1. 0
                  2 December 2021 15: 49
                  I don’t know what’s in his head, but in words Lukashenka doesn’t care. Moreover, it makes no sense for him to blame Russia for this very interview with a Russian journalist, it is not we who are imposing the sanctions.
  18. +2
    1 December 2021 22: 21
    Just like in the song :)
    "Under the hot sun, under the blind night
    We had to go through a lot.
    We are peaceful people, but our armored train
    Stands on the side track! "
  19. +1
    1 December 2021 22: 48
    And in the same Kazakhstan, according to Nazarbayev, everything was completely destroyed. Except for the peaceful atom, in which they are quite strong.

    In general, Lukashenka, like the same Saakashvili, can be loved or hated, but I personally respect them unambiguously. Strong people and colorful politicians. The last mammoths, so to speak. Definitely not Macrons and Sandu.
  20. +4
    2 December 2021 00: 01
    Soil complexes do not really need infrastructure. Update the thorn around the shelf perimeter, install modern alarms and security and defense equipment, throw out mushroom pickers' excrement from the storehouses, paint, clean, hang new gates, throw modern communications, bring in residential modules, a diesel power plant, a mobile boiler room with a body for storages, shelters, etc. baths and you can serve. The main thing is to shaman the road network in the zone, fix bridges, etc. It’s not so expensive, but if the infrastructure is completely revived, then yes, it’s not cheap.
  21. -2
    2 December 2021 00: 30
    Quote: RealPilot
    I am glad about the change of the vector, the neighbor has decided.
    Not a trace of "multi-vector" is left! For the best, Russia is definitely a plus.
    Neither economics, nor politics, nor friendship could change Lukashenka's attitude towards Russia and the West. But personal grievances and ambitions - please!

    And about the positions for the missiles - great. They will come in handy in a threatened period, thanks to him for his foresight.

    BEAT defines consciousness. Rubbed the multi-vector muzzle on the asphalt - you look, constructive ideas appear. Unattended mines for 11 years. Everything needs to be changed, and, not only because it has rotted, but also because the types of missiles are no longer the same. But IMPRESSIVE !.
  22. 0
    2 December 2021 06: 13
    All these positions were shot and drawn on all the maps a long time ago .. so .. - of course you can use them as military objects, remembering that they will be hit in the first place .. You can, after all, poke inflatable rockets on these sites - then the Poles will have an outbreak of diarrhea ...)
  23. -1
    2 December 2021 06: 50
    Belarus retained all but one ICBM launch pad. This was stated by the President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko. Master and with all Heart Loving his Country! good We were blown up and sent to China.
  24. +2
    2 December 2021 07: 01
    The launch sites are too close to the US missile defense system on Polish soil at Redzikowo. They can shoot down ICBMs in the initial phase of the flight. Before an ICBM is launched, it will first have to "extinguish" the missile defense system.
  25. -2
    2 December 2021 07: 15
    And where did the mantras like "haha, well, additional target for NATO missiles" go?

    Uryakalki usually write this way if some country is deploying NATO weapons next to Russia.
    Or is it different?)
  26. -2
    2 December 2021 07: 17
    Quote: Ash Poseidon
    The launch sites are too close to the US missile defense system on Polish soil at Redzikowo. They can shoot down ICBMs in the initial phase of the flight. Before an ICBM is launched, it will first have to "extinguish" the missile defense system.

    And the fact that RB is now coming under a strategic attack from NATO missiles, is it good for RB?

    Usually, local experts tie this up when the conditional Romania hosts the US missile defense system.
  27. +1
    2 December 2021 07: 28
    Keeping ICBMs in Belarus right now is not a good idea. This made sense under the Union, when Belarus was, in fact, the rear, taking into account the ATS countries. Now it is - the front line, next to psheki and svidomye. Cover quickly.
    Here Iskanders - yes.
  28. +1
    2 December 2021 08: 30
    Lukashenko announced the preservation of launch sites for ICBMs on the territory of Belarus

    Ambition, however. It is more expedient to place medium-range missiles in Belarus so that the flight time is shorter. By the way, about ICBMs, or rather about their protection.
    The Russian Peresvet laser complex is primarily designed to disable satellites, military expert Dmitry Kornev said in an interview with Izvestia.
    The analyst called the combat laser one of the echelons of the country's anti-space defense and classified it as an anti-satellite weapon with a functional defeat.

    https://ria.ru/20211202/lazer-1761743235.html
  29. 0
    2 December 2021 09: 41
    Will finish badly ...
  30. 0
    2 December 2021 10: 16
    And here is a good fellow Lukashenka. Whatever "multi-vector" I would develop, I would keep "FIG in my pocket". This is the only way to behave with “partners”.
  31. 0
    3 December 2021 08: 46
    It was Rygorych who got excited, for him an average range is quite enough for nearby comrades. wassat .