In response to NATO initiatives, Lukashenko announced his readiness to offer Russia to place nuclear weapons in Belarus

_{Photo from the official website of the President of the Republic of Belarus}

President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko gave a long interview to the famous Russian journalist Dmitry Kiselyov, who heads the agency "Russia today"... During the interview, many topics were touched upon, including the topic of security both in Belarus and the entire Union State.

In particular, they discussed the topic of statements by representatives of the United States and NATO on the possible deployment of an American nuclear weapons outside Germany (in Europe). The fact is that representatives of the German political elites have once again raised the topic of the need to observe the FRG's nuclear-free status. So far, in fact, this has not been carried out, since there are aviation US Air Force B61 bombs. It is one of the components of the American nuclear arsenal in Europe.

According to Jens Stoltenberg, if Berlin refuses to store American nuclear weapons in Germany, then NATO will consider options for placing these nuclear bombs in other European countries. On the sidelines one of these options sounded - Poland.

Alexander Lukashenko, reacting to this kind of prospects, said that in this case, Minsk will offer Russia to place nuclear weapons on Belarusian soil. According to the President of Belarus, the actual proliferation of the American nuclear arsenal in Europe cannot be left unanswered.

According to Lukashenka, as a possible response to NATO initiatives, he will offer Vladimir Putin to return Russian nuclear weapons to Belarus.

Comments

[Dzafdet]

Something dad got excited. Belarusians are reluctant to live under threat ...

[210ox]

Are you responsible for the Belarusians? For everyone?

[sad235]

I think the vis-a-vis is right.At least I'm not from Belarus, but my father and grandmother are there and I often go there and I can say that the dad cannot stand the absolute majority, with all the ensuing consequences

[210ox]

Well, I also go to Mogilev, Klimovichi. I did not hear any sharp disapproval. From my kin. Pensioners, students, engineer, doctor.

[Overlock]

Quote: 210ox

From my kin. Pensioners, students, engineer, doctor.

Statistically reliable?

[210ox]

I am responsible for those people with whom I communicated.

[Overlock]

This is understandable, but it is statistically unreliable.

[210ox]

Lay out your statistics.

[Overlock]

Quote: 210ox

Lay out your statistics.

It is enough to watch crowds of thousands of people against Lukashenka after the elections. This means that there are several opinions

[210ox]

How many people are there in Belarus? How many participated in the protests? One hundredth part - and that's even a lot.

[Overlock]

Quote: 210ox

How many people are there in Belarus? How many participated in the protests? One hundredth part - and that's even a lot.

Do you rate? Count fractions and hundredths of a percent

[210ox]

And how much? One hundred thousand? There were always enough dissatisfied people. Here I am also dissatisfied with many actions of the GDP and the government. And what of that. Read the comment carefully. I have not heard any sharp, categorical discontent from them. Everywhere they complain about the deterioration of life, a decrease in income.

[Overlock]

Quote: 210ox

And how much? One hundred thousand?

In my opinion, you are claiming 100% or am I wrong?

[210ox]

I don’t understand what 100% I am claiming? I say it again. There are enough disaffected everywhere. Hundreds of a percent of the population are ready to climb the barricades with or without reason.

[poquello]

Quote: Overlock

Do you rate? Count fractions and hundredths of a percent

and what is there to count, 10-20 thousand, even 100-200 - in comparison with the population of nothing, and a simple rule - if 80-90% are against, no fraud will help

[ermak124.0]

awesome argument!

[sabakina]

Quote: ermak124.0

awesome argument!

The argument is not a fact. You can twist them as you like. About statistics, THE SELLING GIRL OF IMPERIALISM IS GENERALLY SILENT.

[kebzuref]

Well, somewhere 10-15 thousand well let's fantasize and say 100 thousand here, and now let's take the population of Belarus 9 349 645 people and count 100 thousand this is 1% of 9 349 645 million population, here is the statistics)) so your video does not talk about anything))

[Kisa]

Quote: kebzuref

, here's the statistics))

Agree if, according to your method, the supporters of the cockroach generally get zero point zero tenths ... without administrative resources, we will go into minus)))

[Lech from Android.]

In fact, this cockroach smeared Tikhanovskaya and her support group from Poland like bedbugs without any problems.

[Kisa]

I give him his due - plays on the verge of a foul - the plane of the heroes refugees Crimea - how many times passed along the edge ... on this forum today he is being shaken in his arms yesterday kicked tomorrow ...
it's a pity the Belarusians disappeared from here it was interesting to argue with them

[Vladimir Mashkov]

Lukashenka thinks right. If NATO is going to attract nuclear weapons to Poland, then it is necessary to try to bring Europe / NATO to their senses by proposing the deployment of Russian counter-nuclear weapons in Belarus. Although, I suppose. these are just fine words: it will get anyone from Russia and anywhere!

[Charik]

maybe they are afraid to say it as it is

[210ox]

Afraid to tell your nephew and uncle? I do not work in the law enforcement agencies of Belarus.

[DesToeR]

Why be afraid? Yes, the KGB fulfills everyone. After all, a year has passed, and there is enough material. Yes, they can be fired from the state plant for participating in rallies. But "funnels" do not run at night. There are no mass shootings in the woods. Personally, I, as a person who did not participate in all this "movement", did not see the state machinery of repression.

[My doctor]

Quote: 210ox

Well, I also go to Mogilev, Klimovichi. I did not hear any sharp disapproval. From my kin. Pensioners, students, engineer, doctor.

To see these people live, not specifically your relatives, Those who sympathize with Lukashenka not for duty, but for personal convictions. It would be interesting to know their reasons.

[lucul]

"To see these people live, not specifically your relatives, Those who sympathize with Lukashenka not for duty, but for personal convictions. It would be interesting to know their arguments."

Well, there is no Lukashenka in Ukraine - and what, the Ukrainians have become better off from this?
Brest, Grodno, Minsk regions and Minsk itself are against Lukashenka.
For Lukashenko, Mogilev, Vitebsk, Gomel regions. That is, the boundary line goes exactly along the 1939 border.
That's the whole deal.

[DesToeR]

Quote: lucul

Brest, Grodno, Minsk regions and Minsk itself are against Lukashenka.

I would not be so sure, especially for Minsk. After all that Sveta has done and said, her views on Lukashenka have changed dramatically. By and large, But father needs to speak less and the opposition's information field will simply be blown away - they have nothing to show him.

[Igor Litvin]

And in Klimovichi he himself more than once heard nostalgia for the USSR and dreams of joining Russia, there is nowhere to work except for the KHP, the Distillery is under bankruptcy:
[media = [media = https: //klimlvz.by/ru/rastut-prodazhi-i-vyruchka-kak-klimovichskij-likero-vodochnyj-zavod-vybiraetsya-iz-dolgovoj-yamy/]]

[poquello]

Quote: MyVrach

Quote: 210ox

Well, I also go to Mogilev, Klimovichi. I did not hear any sharp disapproval. From my kin. Pensioners, students, engineer, doctor.

To see these people live, not specifically your relatives, Those who sympathize with Lukashenka not for duty, but for personal convictions. It would be interesting to know their reasons.

what are the problems? IMHO in Belarus, at least 50% were in favor of him, because when the White Maidan attempted there were no demands for recount and repeated elections, the first sign, in Ukraine it was the same - because of the uncertainty of victory in the elections, the Maidband seized power by terror and force

[T.A.V.]

There is no overwhelming majority in Belarus against Lukashenka. I am from Belarus myself.

[New Year day]

Quote: T.A.V.

There is no overwhelming majority in Belarus against Lukashenka. I am from Belarus myself

You're all lying. Here is the lord claims the opposite

Quote: 210ox

From my kin. Pensioners, students, engineer, doctor.

Is that enough?

[Roman_vh]

Can you read?
And to comprehend what you read?

[Normann]

This is good if 10-15 percent, and even then ... if I myself have lived here for a very long time and communicate with people, and I have not one or two acquaintances, but several hundred (this is the job) and so, against a comrade and RF is good if five percent of my friends ...

[Normann]

You are completely wrong, that's completely ...

[Grits]

Quote: Sad235

dad hate absolute majority, with all the ensuing consequences

Did you conduct a personal survey?

[demos1111]

I live in Minsk, and I will tell you this, they are responsible for their people, who were joined to you "illegally".
And these, about the western ones, with Molodechno and beyond, it will be a different conversation, a little later.
And the Russian soldiers, if necessary, if sent, beat them, as you would beat the Poles and Lithuanians.
Molodechno-enemies !!!

[Real Pilot]

Lukashenka simply raises the stakes in HIS game, fights off impudent "partners" ...
And here it is more important for him personally to make statements than to achieve just such a practical result.

Let everyone get nervous, that's the point - they don't recognize him to the West at all, but he wants to be reckoned with!

[figwam]

He said that he would recognize Crimea on his next trip there.

[tihonmarine]

Quote: figvam

He said that he would recognize Crimea on his next trip there.

Let him not be engaged in migrants, but flies to the Crimea before the New Year, and the people in Crimea will cheer up.

[Kolesnikov Valery]

Very clever, and you will deal with them ???

[sabakina]

Quote: Valery Kolesnikov

Very clever, and you will deal with them ???

What will you do?

[Kolesnikov Valery]

What did I do .............

[Charik]

less than a year later, 7 years later, as soon as they pressed it so immediately

[Ashes of Claes]

Quote: figvam

He said that he would recognize Crimea on his next trip there.

I don't understand - why shouldn't he admit it? He is already persona non grata for the West, so what has he got to lose? He has already given out so much dementia delirium only in the last year that the issue of recognizing Crimea is not even sensational ...

[knn54]

Poles SHOULD:
-build special storage facilities for nuclear weapons in Poland, -organize the transfer there and contain American personnel,
-Certify your aircraft for the use of nuclear bombs
and train pilots.
Who pays for the banquet?
The Yankes, with the help of the "hyena in sheep's clothing," are putting pressure on the FRG and the Russian Federation, trying to achieve certain concessions.

[sad235]

Where did you get such crap (to put it mildly).?

[knn54]

Sergei, I understand that "Darkness is a friend of youth." But not so much.

[Lara Croft]

Quote: Sad235

Where did you get such crap (to put it mildly).?

Tell the good forum users what

bullshit (to put it mildly) picked up

you?

[Niko]

Another confirmation that Lukashenka absolutely does not matter what happens to the people there, or is already happening. That the Poles have enough brains for such games is quite possible, but this statement only confirms that the President of Belarus has about the same number of them.

[Roman_vh]

And what did he say that? Or do you think that American nuclear weapons in Poland add security to Belarusians, while Russian ones reduce them?

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: Roman_VH

And what did he say that? Or do you think that American nuclear weapons in Poland add security to Belarusians, while Russian ones reduce them?

In the event of a global nuclear conflict, neither Poland nor Belarus will physically exist. Glazed surface. The whole point is that there will be NO global nuclear war. Americans also know how to count and are able to estimate that even in the most favorable case for them, the response will still be and it will be absolutely terrible for them.

And this is not "grunting". Let's say that they've gouged EVERYTHING that is possible from the territory of the limitrophes. ONE rocket SUDDENLY from the Urals will fly to New York and send it into the sunset. The one and only New York. All 8 398 748 people. A country that "won" the Second World War and lost 417 thousand at the same time will throw 8 398 748 New Yorkers into the nuclear heat of its ambitions? I don’t think that they will not immediately yell at the Ukrainian motive "What about us?" This is not three and a half thousand innocent victims in the bombing of the Twin Towers organized by the US special services. And not two and a half hundred blacks on the cruiser Maine in the roadstead of Havana. Everything is much more serious.

The only country in the world that wants a nuclear war with Russia, oddly enough, is Ukraine. Earlier it was angry, but now it’s funny to listen to ukrovopli: "Now, if only we had missiles! Yes, with nuclear warheads! Yes, we are that Russia! Yes, how zhahnuli! Yes, even America would help!" The "woman with the scythe" shouted on the Maidan that "Russia needs to be bombed with atomic weapons." And she was not at all alone there so beaten off.

One thing is not clear - where did the skakuass suddenly get the idea that someone would allow them to "zhahnut", that they would not get anything for this, and that after that, Ukraine would not cease to exist as a geographic object.

[tihonmarine]

Quote: Dzafdet

Something dad got excited. Belarusians are reluctant to live under threat ...

This means that if Russia has nuclear weapons, then there is a THREAT, but if there is US nuclear weapons in Poland, this is normal, or maybe you misunderstood. (Explain that nuclear weapons are not badly needed.)

[Thrifty]

This was not enough! With other leaders of Belarus, perhaps, this option would have passed, but onion wants to profit from everything, first bring nuclear weapons there, then give him a couple of warheads ...

[Authority]

Quote: Thrifty

This was not enough! With other leaders of Belarus, perhaps, this option would have passed, but onion wants to profit from everything, first bring nuclear weapons there, then give him a couple of warheads ...

OH YEAH!
Tolley deal with these nuclear warheads to the Cook who does not know how to fry catlets.
"Oh, what is this red button? I love the red one. Probably an expresso cappuccino !!!"
"Prime Minister, come to me. I don't understand how this coffee machine works, I press, I press, but only the siren goes off."

[Overlock]

Quote: Authority

OH YEAH!
Tolley deal with these nuclear warheads to the Cook who does not know how to fry catlets.

I would like to remind you how in 1995 Lukashenka sold the S-6 to America for $ 300 million. Do not forget the fuss of Lukashenka with the Wagnerites 2 years ago.
In addition, there is the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, so all this is pitiful babble

[ViacheslavS]

Do not forget the fuss of Lukashenka with the Wagnerites 2 years ago.

Lukashenko also jailed all pro-Russian candidates in the elections, his employees beat up Russian correspondents. And first of all, Lukashenka is only interested in his own power, all these union states, talks about the recognition of Crimea, maneuvers in order to preserve his power, get more loans from Moscow and give nothing in return.

[Overlock]

Quote: ViacheslavS

First of all, Lukashenka is only interested in his own power, all these union states, talks about the recognition of Crimea, maneuvers in order to preserve his power, get more loans from Moscow and give nothing in return.

Surprisingly, the rest of them never get it.

[Lara Croft]

Quote: Overlock

Quote: Authority

OH YEAH!
Tolley deal with these nuclear warheads to the Cook who does not know how to fry catlets.

there is a Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, so all this is pitiful babble

I beg you ... units of the 12th Main Directorate of the USSR Ministry of Defense were also in the ATS countries, where local pilots were trained to use tactical nuclear weapons .... just our TNWs after the collapse of the ATS were withdrawn from Eastern Europe (out of sin), but the United States was not from Western Europe. ... since NATO did not dissolve itself ... but only expanded ...

[Overlock]

Quote: Lara Croft

I beg you ... units of the 12th Main Directorate of the USSR Ministry of Defense were also in the ATS countries, where local pilots were trained to use TNW ... just our TNW after the collapse of the OV

What I like is my unwavering faith in myself. They thought in the USSR. History teaches that it does not teach anything

[kebzuref]

The US nonproliferation treaty has long been wiped out in 4 European countries the US has a total of 150 nuclear warheads

[Roman_vh]

I do not understand, do you think that nuclear weapons will be handed over to Lukashenka for use? Did you sort of position yourself as a "spiky" character?

[Stepan S]

In addition, there is the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons

Those. Americans in Germany can be transported to Poland, too, but if we go to Belarus, is it a treaty? We will not transfer it, but there will simply be a base, a warehouse.

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: Stepan S

In addition, there is the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons

Those. Americans in Germany can be transported to Poland, too, but if we go to Belarus, is it a treaty? We will not transfer it, but there will simply be a base, a warehouse.

Here I am about that. There is NATO, with the same Germany (let’s omit the occupation issue for the time being) and, in the near future, they slapped the hands like a merchant, merrily with Poland,

... having given your word, hold on; instead of giving, be strong! You are a merchant, you must understand what the word means. (with)

We had a buffet lunch and ate and "let our missiles lie here for a while."

We also have a CSTO with Belarus. Let our missiles "lie there for now." I see no obstacles and no need for any additional agreements ...

[DymOk_v_dYmke]

Quote: Authority

OH YEAH!
Tolley deal with these nuclear warheads to the Cook who does not know how to fry catlets.

They tried to push her in order to invite the striped ones with nuclear weapons under their arms closer to Russia.

[tralflot1832]

Calm down, the heads of the NATO foreign ministries entered into a dialogue with Russia, and considers this diaologist vital. The Russian Foreign Ministry and all have arrived. And not any statements like yesterday.

[Overlock]

Quote: tralflot1832

Calm down, the heads of the NATO Foreign Ministry entered into a dialogue with Russia, and considers this diaologist vital.

Don’t share the link?

[Terenin]

In response to NATO's initiatives, Lukashenko stated ...

Well, finally, now there is someone to respond to NATO initiatives, otherwise they are completely bored ...

[poquello]

Quote: Terenin

In response to NATO's initiatives, Lukashenko stated ...

Well, finally, now there is someone to respond to NATO initiatives, otherwise they are completely bored ...

ett after the nuclear power plant he got crazy))))

[Authority]

Quote: Dzafdet

Something dad got excited. Belarusians are reluctant to live under threat ...

So tell that to the Poles and Americans.
Belarus is no stranger to nuclear weapons, it was already.

[Igor Litvin]

With such statements, and what is even worse - actions, Lukashenka turns Belarus into a Russian foothold. I don’t want to live on anyone’s beachhead.

[New Year day]

he will offer Vladimir Putin to return Russian nuclear weapons to Belarus.

He can offer something, but who will give it to him ?!

[tralflot1832]

The Russian missile brigade with Iskanders will calmly call in, and maybe reinforced on the territory of Belarus. Tomorrow I am waiting for the shouts of Stoltenberg and the Poles, you have no right, yeah schaz. Think Lukashenka and Putin only speaks about migrants. The synchronicity of Putin’s statements about Ukraine, Lukashenka’s about Poland is frightening. It looks like the issue is resolved, cheap and cheerful.

[isv000]

Quote: tralflot1832

The synchronicity of Putin's statements about Ukraine, Lukashenka’s about Poland is paralyzing. It looks like the issue is resolved, cheap and cheerful.

In the end, we have a military alliance and a Union State, and explaining anything to anyone is not respecting yourself ... NATO can take different routes: into a garden, a dark forest, or just an erotic journey on foot ...

[sad235]

Your mother, she will calmly call in and calmly organize a war. Will you go to fight yourself or send your children and grandchildren?

[tralflot1832]

Troll if you give up, then I won't go.

[olegactor]

he will offer Vladimir Putin to return Russian nuclear weapons to Belarus.

and who said that rin. dossy lyakham will control nuclear weapons

[zadorin1974]

As I understand it, Oleg? At the moment, about 150 US nuclear weapons are deployed at five bases in Europe: 2 in Italy, Germany, the Netherlands and Turkey. But this does not mean that military data of states have access to these arsenals. Yes, pilots. these countries have been trained in the use, and the planes are equipped with a reset system (with a one-way ticket, it's a pity). BUT !!!! The decision-making center is located in Fashington, but not like in the capitals of the host countries, local warriors are not even allowed close to the arsenals. Poland, and Romania, and so under the gun of our nuclear warhead (with a primary strike) in connection with the missile defense systems of mattresses (although The starting ones are standard, you can load the axes). So, the Poles are already half-and-half-100 kilotons to them, or 1000-they will definitely grunted.

[Crimean partisan 1974]

He can offer something, but who will give it to him ?!

... flying time .... Iskanders of Kaliningrad may not reach every member or vagina here, but from Belarus ... everything is in the palm of your hand .... so within the framework of the CSTO everything is possible

[fruc]

Once in Poland a fist is created against the union state, then in Belarus long-range artillery can be supplied with special. ammunition.

[Vaўkalak]

In any case, the intensity of flights of aviation of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus has increased. Already the Tu-22 flew over the borders of the SG, Tu-160, and today the Su-30SM are Belarusian and Russian. Also, just the other day, it was announced about intentions to conduct joint exercises on our southern borders, that is, from 404 (for the first time, by the way). In general, all these unfriendly actions spurred on to more active military cooperation.

[isv000]

Quote: Vaўkalak

In general, all these unfriendly actions spurred on to more active military cooperation.

Thank you very much to our western partners for such a good stone in the foundation of the new Union !!!

[sad235]

So what's next? Sugar coupons.?

[Charik]

us condoms-im vaseline

[poquello]

Quote: Sad235

So what's next? Sugar coupons.?

Well, we are not in the USA today and not under Gorbachev yesterday, tea, food and other things are enough

[Observer2014]

In response to NATO initiatives, Lukashenko announced his readiness to offer Russia to place nuclear weapons in Belarus

What exactly does Lukashenka want from the numerous nomenclature of nuclear weapons? Can be heard without an incomprehensible "nuclear weapon" Ask why clarification. And then to understand why this is Lukashenko except for his vanity consolation. There is no practical in terms of strategic advantages of the deployment of nuclear weapons in Belarus for Russia. Tell him that Lukashenka wants to get a nuclear bomb. That's it.

[kventinasd]

Quote: Observer2014

There is no practical, in terms of strategic, advantages of deploying nuclear weapons in Belarus for Russia.

Still as it is, and first of all, to cool the gusts of Polish lickers of American shoes.

[Observer2014]

Still as it is, and first of all, to cool the gusts of Polish lickers of American shoes.

Belarus is a member of the CSTO. With all the problems for the external enemies of Belarus. And Lukashenka’s nuclear weapons cannot be seen as his own ears. There is only one way to get the basing of Russian nuclear weapons - to become the Belarusian province.

[bk316]

This will become the Belarusian province.

All of Europe is saturated with American TNW. Germany Italy etc. are they now US provinces?

[Observer2014]

They have other principles of communication. There are replaceable governments. And here Lukashenko will see the danger from Russia tomorrow .... And!? Like in the story with 33 heroes.

[bk316]

So what? Nobody is going to hand over TNW to him.

[Timon2155]

Do you really think so shortsightedly that nuclear weapons will fulfill the whims of Lukashenka? Commands and orders will come from Moscow! Don't even doubt it! Nobody will give nuclear weapons to anyone, only Moscow will decide how much.

[Kisa]

Imagine Pashinyan will have nuclear weapons as a member of our bloc. is not an argument in the next showdown for Karabakh ???

[Igor Litvin]

just like that - decision-making in Belarus is non-transparent, it depends on what kind of foot one person got up on, no mechanisms for restraining and balancing wrong decisions. Someone saw a thread in the public domain of the so-called. "union programs"? But these are fundamental documents that determine the fate of the people for decades to come! But it turns out that someone was "resolved" there with someone ...

[tihonmarine]

Quote: bk316

Germany Italy etc. are they now US provinces?

Rather states, and some are just counties.

[neri73-r]

Quote: Observer2014

And Lukashenka’s nuclear weapons cannot be seen as his own ears. There is only one way to get the basing of Russian nuclear weapons - to become the Belarusian province.

Neither Belarus, nor Ukraine, nor Kazakhstan have ever had their own nuclear weapons! It (nuclear weapons) was only based on their territory, and the subordination of units was ALWAYS in Moscow.

[bk316]

There is no practical, in terms of strategic, advantages of deploying nuclear weapons in Belarus for Russia.

Just a lot of benefits. I wrote below.

[New Year day]

Quote: Observer2014

What exactly does Lukashenka want from the numerous nomenclature of nuclear weapons?

Is it not clear - EVERYTHING!

[Kolesnikov Valery]

Can you read al no ???? Not Russia will provide nuclear weapons, but will place its own, that Russian .......

[isv000]

Quote: Observer2014

What exactly does Lukashenka want from the numerous nomenclature of nuclear weapons?

It is enough to place several Iskander divisions in Belarus and remind those who wish that the Guns of this can send not only Caliber with Zircon, but also their own missiles with yellow markings to especially stubborn ones ...

[stankow]

Art. caliberi 152 mm Hyacinth, 203 mm Peony, 240 mm Tulip can also. And it's even easier to place.

[tihonmarine]

According to Lukashenka, as a possible response to NATO initiatives, he will offer Vladimir Putin to return Russian nuclear weapons to Belarus.

This will cool NATO hotheads.

[Observer2014]

This will cool NATO hotheads.

And it will add a headache to Russia.

[Timon2155]

Do you offer to stand in the knee-elbow and relax? Do you think it will work? No. Force always worked! Point!

[OSE4Kinsura]

There are no puppeteers! And the stubborn Poles! Yes!

[isv000]

Quote: tihonmarine

This will cool NATO hotheads.

Only the low temperature of the morgue will cool them.

[bk316]

Well done. TNW is natural. In the form of Iskander warheads, for example. And it's also good for missile defense, so that missiles in
Poland to shoot down with the help of SBCH right at the start. Well, and something hypersonic, winged type of ground zircon, that would fly to Warsaw in 2 minutes.

[Andrey Moskvin]

Are missile defense systems in Warsaw?

[bk316]

Are missile defense systems in Warsaw?
On our missile defense system to install an SBS and place it in the Republic of Belarus.

[Observer2014]

Well done. TNW is natural. In the form of Iskander warheads, for example. And it's also good for missile defense, so that missiles in
Poland to shoot down with the help of SBCH right at the start. Well, and something hypersonic, winged type of ground zircon, that would fly to Warsaw in 2 minutes.

We have the Kaliningrad region for this. What other arguments will you publish to convince Russia to give independent Lukashenka a nuclear bomb?

[New Year day]

Quote: Observer2014

What other arguments will you publish to convince Russia to give Lukashenka a nuclear bomb?

How not to respect Luka!

[Observer2014]

How not to respect Luka! fellow

Well, really. Just for the sake of respect for Lukashenka, give him a nuclear bomb))))
Greetings Sylvester!

[New Year day]

Quote: Observer2014

Just for the sake of respect for Lukashenka, give him a nuclear bomb

Good evening! Why don’t they shout jingo-patriots until Luka’s next trick, and then, “and what for us?”

[Kolesnikov Valery]

Not to give Lukashenko, but to place the Russian one, something is wrong in your head ...

[Observer2014]

Not to give Lukashenko, but to place the Russian one, something is wrong in your head ...

For what!? And why should Russia place TNW in Belarus? Can you argue clearly and concretely?

[Kolesnikov Valery]

Is it still not clear? To curb Poland a little, or rather not her, but those who are behind her ... Well, the Poles will also think about it ...

[Observer2014]

Is it still not clear? To curb Poland a little, or rather not her, but those who are behind her ... Well, the Poles will also think about it ...

The Poles have the Kaliningrad region close by with any range of weapons at Russia's discretion, while Belarus is a member of the CSTO. What's next? There is really an argument for everyone to say yes! For example, we are bringing aviation nuclear bombs to Belarus.

[Roman_vh]

Compare the area of ​​the Kaliningrad region and the Republic of Belarus. And you will understand the difference. This time. Try to find Iskander's battalion in the swamp forests of Belarusians. These are two. And simply, two positional areas are always better than one. Better yet, five.

[Observer2014]

And that Lukoshenko is going to place Russian military bases? We are talking only about Russian nuclear weapons.

[Roman_vh]

Are you serious now? Do you think LukAshenko is dumber than Psaki?

[Observer2014]

Are you serious now? Do you think LukAshenko is dumber than Psaki?

No, but much more cunning than you and people like you.

[Roman_vh]

So it is after all known that there is a cunning opu. A trick won't help here. Here, however, there are regulations and instructions.

[stankow]

Have you tried to stop the leopard battalion that broke through? Break through the baht. supports. Have you tried the item without putting the floor on the shelf? Me neither. But they trained. I will tell you - 2 to 15 kilotons.

[Observer2014]

Have you tried to stop the leopard battalion that broke through? Break through the baht. supports. Have you tried the item without putting the floor on the shelf? Me neither. But they trained. I will tell you - 2 to 15 kilotons.

No, I trained myself to prevent the Lepard battalion from breaking through, too. Would you like to tell me how? Everything ingenious is simple.

[stankow]

Give one, arrange - owls. other.

[alexmach]

It would be much more useful to place aviation and air defense systems there.

[Timon2155]

Do you think they are not there? Air defense and aviation are always and everywhere first!

[alexmach]

Do you think they are not there? Air defense and aviation are always and everywhere first!

I don’t think I know. And I remember how long Luka did his brains about the base in Baranovichi. For all its attachment to Russia, Belarus is still completely ineffective in this regard.

[Timon2155]

So nuclear weapons are not there. As it appears, air defense and aviation will already be there.

[alexmach]

So nuclear weapons are not there. As it appears, air defense and aviation will already be there.

So the problem is that Lukashenka once obsessed with the most simple and necessary. Moreover, he did it when there was no such tension either internationally or in Belarus itself, when troops could be deployed there without much noise and dust.

[Timon2155]

Since then, the situation has changed somewhat, don't you think? We once also danced with the West. You know what happened.

[alexmach]

In some ways it has changed, but in others not very much. As you can see, the Air Force base was not and is not. In addition, both Lukashenka himself and their entire power bloc are still politically independent from Moscow.

[Timon2155]

There will be everything: the base, the training center, and nuclear weapons. Judging by the latest events, “soft power” has been recognized as ineffective, and a trend has been set for mirror actions.

[Roman_vh]

One does not replace the other, but complements.

[isv000]

Quote: bk316

Well done. TNW is natural. In the form of Iskander warheads, for example. And it's also good for missile defense, so that missiles in
Poland to shoot down with the help of SBCH right at the start. Well, and something hypersonic, winged type of ground zircon, that would fly to Warsaw in 2 minutes.

Iskander's guns are unified for Caliber and, accordingly, for Zircon ...

[Most polite]

It is unlikely that he will really allow to place nuclear weapons on its territory, but how the way to bend / scare neighbors looks quite acceptable. Well, there are probably other goodies .. although there are a lot of disadvantages.

[isv000]

Quote: Most polite

It is unlikely that he will really allow to place nuclear weapons on its territory.

So there is a Union State and a military alliance between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus ...

[Overlock]

Quote: Most polite

but here's how the way to bend / scare the neighbors looks quite acceptable

As refugees - frightened?

[OSE4Kinsura]

Well done! Lifetime guarantee of the inviolability of borders! We are together, until their end, or-or! Rather, the truth is ours! If we win the internal, and then the external!

[Sands Careers General]

In response to NATO initiatives, Lukashenko announced his readiness to offer Russia to place nuclear weapons in Belarus

Oops, suddenly))
Luca, as always, burns with napalm with statements))
In all senses

[isv000]

Quote: General of the Sand Quarries

Oops, suddenly))
Luca, as always, burns with napalm with statements))
In all senses

He also announced that Crimea was Russian and was going to go there ...

[Sands Careers General]

It is worth going to Crimea, I myself was there on the South Coast three times this year)))

[isv000]

Quote: General of the Sand Quarries

It is worth going to Crimea, I myself was there on the South Coast three times this year)))

You're making fun, my friend!

[Sands Careers General]

There is little

But this is for work, hard labor, although the sea))

[isv000]

Quote: General of the Sand Quarries

But this is for work, hard labor, although the sea))

Labor at sea?

[Sands Careers General]

No, I'm a classic land rat

[cniza]

So far, in fact, this has not been carried out, since the US Air Force B61 aerial bombs are on the territory of Germany. This is one of the components of the American nuclear arsenal in Europe.

Yes, this arsenal will not move anywhere, Europe is occupied by the United States and will do what they say ...

[Clear]

Quote: cniza

So far, in fact, this has not been carried out, since the US Air Force B61 aerial bombs are on the territory of Germany. This is one of the components of the American nuclear arsenal in Europe.

Yes, this arsenal will not move anywhere, Europe is occupied by the United States and will do what they say ...

And you can't go anywhere. There is no full-fledged army of its own.

[cniza]

So for us the difference is not big - Poland or Germany ...

[Clear]

Quote: cniza

So for us the difference is not big - Poland or Germany ...

Aha, Poland
Since when did I hear the Polish laudatory proverb - "The army polish Berlin took in Rossyisk - helped ... "

[Roman_vh]

Well, then there is a difference, 700 miles is not a ram sneezed

[Apollo]

The world will clearly lose if another "monkey with a grenade" appears in the post-Soviet space.

[tralflot1832]

And who said that the order to launch such serious missiles would be given to Lukashenka. No words, only insults !!!

[Sergej1972]

So we are talking about the deployment of Russian units with nuclear weapons. It will be Russian nuclear weapons on the territory of the Republic of Belarus.

[Timon2155]

It looks like the world has already lost ... Once you write such comments without thinking

[tralflot1832]

Farts rushed in Ukraine! Hold on to Crimea. Lukashenko A.G. expressed a desire to visit Crimea. Look soon and we will unite.

[isv000]

Quote: tralflot1832

You look soon and we will unite.

The West can be brainwashed by the new elections to the new Union, where Putin is president and Lukashenka is vice president!

[tralflot1832]

I agree completely. And this will be a good decision. But should we not aim at the governors of Holland and Belgium or vice versa. We will unite that a man is a man, and a woman is a woman and beautiful children in love are obtained .. And not one parent and two guardians.

[isv000]

Quote: tralflot1832

I agree completely. And this will be a good decision. But should we not aim at the governors of Holland and Belgium or vice versa. We will unite that a man is a man, and a woman is a woman and beautiful children in love are obtained .. And not one parent and two guardians.

No. These, especially from Holland, can only be treated with electric current ... so you remind me very well - I'll go and see the garage ...

[Alex_You]

Their women are just scary, so there is probably no difference.

[ximkim]

Quote: Observer2014

This will cool NATO hotheads.

And it will add a headache to Russia.

Not add. The headache is created for decades to come.

[Gardener91]

Quote: ximkim

The headache was created for decades to come.

If it doesn't bang earlier.

[CommanderDIVA]

A strong enough move of the Arab League and GDP to knock down arrogance from the Poles and Americans, and it is easier for the Germans to take out American weapons to Italy or Belgium, they already have them there.

[Knell wardenheart]

If we consider this from the point of view of the leader of a sovereign state, then this is game. It is irresponsible to place someone else's nuclear weapons on its territory, to make it the target of a potential counter-force strike and potential large-scale pollution, even if it is partially successful. A leader of any country who cares for the nation should avoid such situations as much as possible.
IMHO, this kind of statement is another "insanely first" move by Alexander Grigorievich, demonstrating so to speak ..

[suhorukofal]

Wiki is not a source, of course, but even superficially enough to estimate the arsenal at our borders, it's not such a game:

Today, experts (including those from the Federation of American Scientists, FAS) estimate the number of US nuclear bombs in Europe and Turkey at 150-200. These are B-61 type bombs with a total capacity of 18 megatons. They are located at six air bases: in Germany (Büchel, more than 20 pieces), Italy (Aviano and Gedi, 70-110 pieces), Belgium (Kleine Brogel, 10-20 pieces), the Netherlands (Volkel, 10-20 pieces) and Turkey (Incirlik, 50-90 pieces).

[Knell wardenheart]

Well, if you look at the statistics of chronic alcoholism, you may also get the feeling that this is, in principle, a normal phenomenon for the human population) But the presence of precedents does not mean that this is NORMAL. In terms of int. community, the use of nuclear weapons against a country without nuclear weapons is not comme il faut, but when military facilities with nuclear weapons that threaten someone are located on the territory of this country, this already becomes a justified step. Belarus is far from Switzerland, its population does not have such convenient landscapes and developed Grob to draw a large red cross on the fifth point so easily. It does not matter at all how it is in the world or in Europe - if I lived in Blr, I would definitely not have received such words and decisions with enthusiasm. In the case of a well-thought-out "Day X", this will not add security, because the advanced weapons will be destroyed in the first place by the entire arsenal of weapons. Accordingly, clouds of dust and ash will spread radioactive particles of what is left of them across the territory of Blr, and given that this is not such a large territory (it is enough to remember what damage was caused by the same Blr by one accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant), this may end the history of Blr. If in the same central Europe foreign nuclear weapons are the sad legacy of the Cold War, which civil activists or individual parties / politicians have been trying to exterminate for decades, then comrade Lukashenko wants this thing to be in the present and future of his country in the 21st century. In my opinion, this is very sad, if not frightening.

[suhorukofal]

Quote: Knell Wardenheart

In terms of int. community use of nuclear weapons against a country without nuclear weapons is not comme il faut

Reinforced concrete argument, since this is not good, then they will not do it, practice proves this perfectly.

Quote: Knell Wardenheart

the legacy of the Cold War, which civil activists or individual parties / politicians have been trying to eliminate for decades,

In general, civic activists want a lot, you can take another look at their practice to see what it has led to.

Quote: Knell Wardenheart

then comrade Lukashenko wants this thing to be in the present-future of his country in the 21st century

And he is not alone, nuclear weapons are the most significant example of a guarantee against a strike on their own country, thanks to him, just the same, the history of some countries has not ended.
In modern history, nothing has been better than this deterrence argument. In general, world practice shows that you are very far from the truth, not to mention illusions in the spirit of "not comme il faut" reasoning. Where did you see the concept of decency for me a big secret, but hypocrisy and "double standards" are enough with my head.

[Timon2155]

You seem to be delusional. This means that they want to place them in Poland, they placed nuclear weapons in a bunch of European countries, normally. And then suddenly the lukash became bad - he does not think about the people! You would have invested these thoughts in the leaders of Europe, you see, would have thrown American bombs back to their homeland across the ocean. And so, an empty breech. If there is a tactical need to place nuclear weapons in Belarus, they will. The opinion of incompetent people is not interesting to anyone.

[Knell wardenheart]

Interestingly, with this logic, you probably support Western tolerance?)
Probably not every game should be copied, scared away! If you think that the placement of our nuclear weapons in the same Blr will sober up the Americans, for example, or the Poles - and they will say "well, nunafig, that's it, you need to put away your weapons, it smells of fried" - no, they won't say that. they will have an excuse not to relocate the old, but to bring in a new one, for the elimination of ours on the territory of the Blr "in case of day X". And the Polish politota will have one more reason to wail about the growing Russian threat, the need to deploy large response forces and large missile defense systems. We would again return to the dumb dispositions of some 1-60s "pre-Razryadkov era". You can argue to me that we are already returning, right. But at the moment, this is a trend with a fairly large resistance in the face of the idea of ​​their armed forces and a "nuclear-free Europe" gradually growing in reasonable EU countries. Otherwise, we would have broken this trend as well, and what tactical benefits would we have achieved by doing this? How are the distances of the approach of the RIAC from Blr critically different from the distances from Kaliningrad? But they have already got used to Kaliningrad, they have resigned themselves. And Blr will be a "new corn", no benefits, no winnings. One big continuous crap - primarily for us and our foreign policy. About the fact that ordinary Belarusians do not need this rush, I have already said above. No, it's cool if you are a jerk and dream of being burned in a nuclear flame against the background of a starting response, but this will not increase the real security of Blr or us.
Luka just drifted in a fit of passion, maybe he wants the EU to change its mind and give him the crab of reconciliation, maybe he needs another tranche from us.

[Timon2155]

Don't confuse safety and tolerance. If, from the point of view of my safety, nuclear weapons are placed in Belarus, I'm only for. In the days of the USSR, it was not in vain that such a weapon was there, let it be now. I'm tired of this position I endured: what will the West say, whether there will be a reason, and how the media will write. Host of us! A strong country does not ask anyone what to do and where to place it! It is necessary for safety-place! Romania, Poland - anti-missile positioning areas appeared there? Have appeared! We gave a reason? No! They press, we only answer. The position of Leopold the Cat does not work. Don't you get it yet? And let the Poles, Germans, Romanians and others like them know that it takes a few minutes for warheads to fly to them. I used to place gifts in Chukotka for Alaska and the USA - they are respected and reckoned only with the strong. The weak are rubbed into the dust. And yes, about the benefit, don't you know? From Belarus, unlike Kaliningrad, almost all of Europe is covered, including Romania from the north.

[Gardener91]

Quote: Knell Wardenheart

If we consider this from the point of view of the leader of a sovereign state, then this is game. Place someone else's nuclear weapons on their territory

Sometimes I see too many "wild", sovereign states in Europe divorced from foreign nuclear weapons. And nuclear power plants can and are targets with "pollution".

[suhorukofal]

Lukashenka is still a person and did a lot of oddities, I feel special love for him, seeing how easily he changes his views, but lately, given what is happening in the countries of "enlightened democracies", it is especially fun to read how terrible he is, especially against the background of such personalities as Erdogan. That, nooo, that good guy, democratic and his own, although in his antics he does not stand on ceremony at all.

[Gardener91]

Quote: suhorukofal

Erdogan. That, nooo, that good guy, democratic and his own, although in his antics he does not stand on ceremony at all.

Recently, as yesterday, the admins deleted my link to the publication on the VO itself, on Erdogan and Crimea. I understand that yes, good.

[Roman_vh]

That is, do you think that in the event of the deployment of nuclear weapons in Poland, with the subsequent negative development of events, it will not affect the Republic of Belarus in any way? And even vice versa, will there be indulgences? Mmm daaassss.

[Knell wardenheart]

When you read, apparently in what is written you see only what you want to see. I write that NOT ONE ADEQUATE, RESPONSIBLE LEADER in a terrible nightmare would not place ANYONE else's nuclear weapons on the territory of his small state. When this nuclear weapon is its own (like that of the DPRK or Israel), it is a given, it is a guarantee of security. When this YAO is ALIEN, the country where it is located automatically becomes a satrap sleeping in a previously prepared grave. The fact that individual states are eager to see foreign missile warheads is just as hard as it is, this is the flirting of a pussy and a transformer, in fact it is such a sophisticated Russian roulette, winning in which today's and tomorrow's moderate gesheft, loss is the end of ecology, large cities, arable land, gene pool, infrastructure, etc. Sly-backed Poles think that all this may not come, but the money is real - well, this is their mentality, and in 1939, too, they waited all the way to visit from the wrong side. We think we are smarter than the Poles, why should we be like them?

[Kolesnikov Valery]

Guys, do you even know how to read ??? proposed to place Russian nuclear weapons and not to transfer, or you have no difference ???? This is for those who are worried about the transfer, there is no question of it and will not be ........

[Bear]

The statement is purely political, but significant, cooling down too "hot Pshek heads", the main thing is that the father then "does not turn on the back", although in the current situation, it is unlikely. With a statement about the Crimea, Alexander Grigorievich, finally tied up with flirting on two fronts.

[Gardener91]

Quote: Orso

With a statement about Crimea, Alexander Grigorievich, finally tied up with flirting on two fronts.

May he never tie up, conscientiously trading fuels and lubricants, gas, electricity, paper, fuel briquettes from sawdust with those who are ready to drown him even now. Or is it different?

[Vasily Onischuk]

Western "parterres" together with "Nezalezhnaya" still put the squeeze on the dad. And he realized that it was impossible to play further in a multi-vector approach.

[mortido]

For a full-fledged asymmetric answer to the unruly partners, it is still possible for Moldova (Transnistria) to ask Russia to place nuclear weapons. Then the grief of partners will definitely sweat here and there ...

[Fisherman]

Batsko said that "Crimea is both de facto and de jure Russian," and this is the official recognition of Crimea as Russian.
Batsko said that he personally saved the entire infrastructure for nuclear weapons ("I am a zealous owner") and he (with reservations in which case, but this is no longer important) will ask Putin to return nuclear weapons to Belarus.
Putin today at the VTB forum avoided answering the question of the introduction of Russian troops into the Ruin, so he avoided answering that he actually made it clear that he would enter without asking the EU, etc.
Our missiles cover the entire Black Sea and almost the entire Mediterranean Sea from Crimea and Syria tightly.
The Baltic Fleet sent two Varshavyankas and a corvette to the Far East, reinforcing the Vilyuchinsk grouping, which practically all came out on duty.
On February 4, the Olympics in Beijing will open and in February the Yankees howled that the Russian Federation would start a war in the Ruin.
It seems to me that Taiwan will explode from the Ruin as scheduled. Everything is ready, in principle.
And Belarus, for insurance, will accept columns with Iskanders until spring and maybe something else not sickly, well, so that NATO is a bit at a loss in its plans.

[Alex_You]

Wow, you should write books ...

[Fisherman]

Quote: mortido

For a full-fledged asymmetric answer to the unruly partners, it is still possible for Moldova (Transnistria) to ask Russia to place nuclear weapons. Then the grief of partners will definitely sweat here and there ...

Moldova and the Transnistrian Republic are different shores (both figuratively and geographically). But essentially I agree with you. True, Transnistria without nuclear weapons is calmly waiting for a signal to arrange "ticks" for the Ukronatsik.

[Moskovit]

Unfortunately, only nuclear weapons are a 100% guarantee of the preservation of sovereignty. So Lukashenka is right.

[Sergej1972]

We are talking about Russian nuclear weapons on the territory of Belarus, and not about the transfer of these weapons to Belarus.

[Bad Pig (Ham)]

do not wake up smartly - while it is quiet ...
Dedicated to all Baltic and Greater Poland "tigers" ...

[sidoroff]

Lukashenko so many times "rewrote" the Constitution of the Republic of Belarus for himself, his beloved, swore on it many times, but did not bother to read it - article 18: "Article 18. The Republic of Belarus in its foreign policy proceeds from the principles of equality of states, the non-use of force or the threat of force, inviolability of borders, peaceful settlement of disputes, non-interference in internal affairs and other generally recognized principles and norms of international law.
The Republic of Belarus aims to make its territory a nuclear-free zone, and the state - neutral. "

[Rusticolus]

The Republic of Belarus aims to make its territory a nuclear-free zone,

And Ukraine aims to live on the neck of NATO and the EU. And what is it? Well, I didn’t.

[Charik]

hahaha-jelly, obviously I didn’t come up with the placement myself

[HMR333]

Well, in fact, there is a ban and it is worth both to warn and do it without hesitation, contrary to the ban, it will immediately be destroyed by missiles, and let the countries that accepted it then do not talk about aggression and the like!

[Tagan]

Quote: Nikishin

It's only the beginning! Crimea recognizes the same. Now Lukashenka agrees to any sex, even dangerous, even in a group, even free of charge, because he understands that it’s Rostov otherwise, but he doesn’t want to go to Rostov. In fact, outcasts should stick together.

Rostov is far from the worst choice. Not in Kuev with mad skakuasa.

[Alex_You]

And that it will not fly from Russia? It's just that bombs are far away from the territory of the United States.

[Roman_vh]

So let them carry. Iboneh.
You never know where it flies from. Keep yours to yourself.

[Chief Officer Lom]

Quote: Overlock

Quote: 210ox

Lay out your statistics.

It is enough to watch crowds of thousands of people against Lukashenka after the elections. This means that there are several opinions

Once such a huge crowd gathered for a protest rally meant that the patience of the majority of the population was running out, about 100-150 years ago. But since then, both the possibilities of transport and political technologies have changed, and to collect from all over the country, or even from neighboring states (it is relevant for the post-Soviet space with its multinational Russian-speaking population, you cannot tell a German from a French) dissatisfied and just wanting to earn extra money - a matter of organization and relatively small expenses.

[www3]

yeah ... then with all the resources and technologies Lukashenka could not collect even 5000 from all over the country on the square for his support))
and so .. walk escho from russia))

[www3]

Quote: Rusticolus

The Republic of Belarus aims to make its territory a nuclear-free zone,

And Ukraine aims to live on the neck of NATO and the EU. And what is it? Well, I didn’t.

and you are so worried about how ukraine will live on the neck of the eu that you cannot even kyushat))

[aszzz888]

In response to NATO initiatives, Lukashenko announced his readiness to offer Russia to place nuclear weapons in Belarus

Is it really the end of Rygorovich's "multi-vector nature"!?!

[Dikson]

What's the point in that? Tactical? shells for artillery and aerial bombs? All of Europe and so it is possible to cover from the territory of Russia .. It is not necessary to scare the Europeans, but those who sit across the ocean and think that no war will affect him .. And about those ..- this is from NATO, in the case of placing missiles on Ukraine, the arrival time will be 5-7 minutes .. And we have to the states, as it was under the USSR, and still - 30 ... They will have time to cover us 4 times .. while our generals will confer - press the button or let gentlemen from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs are expressing their concerns ..) Since the time of the Cuban missile crisis, the Americans have put us in our place and are systematically tightening the noose .. Oh, yes .. we do have submarines and airplanes .. somewhere closer to the United States .. but it's time to make a decision - 7 minutes .. and not 30 .. and most importantly - do not succumb to provocations, right? and then those who are beyond the Urals will survive. Petersburgers and Muscovites need to fidget about it ..

[Wedmak]

But is there any point in deploying nuclear weapons in Belarus? We don't have that many bombs, mostly all in ICBMs. Belarus covers an area of ​​less than 600x600 km, that ICBM is not about anything at all. In addition, our complexes will be monitored there by radars and reconnaissance aircraft.
Moreover, it makes no sense at all to place stationary launchers there.

[stankow]

What does the ICBM have to do with it! It's about TNW!

[opuonmed]

it is necessary to stir if there are threats from the west!

[Igor Litvin]

as a result, there will be even more of these threats!

[opuonmed]

Quote: Igor Litvin

as a result, there will be even more of these threats!

Yes, the current of understanding on both sides of the self-destruction of the current, this will induce both sides to sit down at the negotiating table! there are many options 1) bluff and play 2) delay time to create something that will suppress all the advantage of the opponent 3) close 1 opponent tightly and buy for a deshego izalit so to speak 4) everything is done so that the power changes inside and their receiver stands up and There is a lot of scenario) but the power understands the current strength to sit down and start talking) there will be more threats to ishe! they just do everything so that the Russian Federation would get up and hit the table)))) and maybe their such tactics they all do so knowing that the Russian Federation will not answer)))

[Nafanya from the sofa]

Minsk will offer Russia to place nuclear weapons on Belarusian soil.

And he doesn't want the key to the apartment where the money is? This inadequate and blackmailer only lacks a bomb.
And there is no guarantee that tomorrow he will not change his mind and hand it over to his "partners" from Europe.

[Seld]

Things are good! Only one question: do not the people of Belarus first need to ask consent to live literally on / with a vigorous bonba? Well, is there a referendum or some kind of social poll? Or - "this is different"?
Imagine: a neighbor comes to me and asks me to keep an anti-tank mine on my balcony until better times. I agree without asking the jona and the kids.
Oyyyyyyyyyyyyyts what would I be !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Dzafdet]

Quote: 210ox

Are you responsible for the Belarusians? For everyone?

Yes, for everyone. Nobody wants to become a target for a nuclear strike.