Military Review

NATO Secretary General destroys Europe

32
NATO Secretary General destroys Europe
Photo: NATO


So that is all. The Russians are in a panic, the Germans look in dismay at the Büchel airbase, hoping that the IDS Tornado from the 33rd tactical wing of the Luftwaffe will not fly away and take away the atomic bombs they love so much. Only the Poles, who have finally become an almost nuclear country, are happy.

This is precisely the picture that looms after the statement by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg on November 19 at a NATO event held in Germany.

General nuclear weapon can be placed in Eastern Europe!

I wonder if Europeans will ever learn to elect to important positions people who understand the value and importance of their own words?

Throw in a passing phrase that seriously changes the political structure of Europe. No, not military, but political.

For the Poles, who have long after leaving the EU, Great Britain, yearn to take the place of the US representative in the European Union, this is just happiness that fell suddenly.

For the Germans, finally - just as suddenly fallen down treatment for a long illness. Suddenly get a chance to survive in a future war, stop being the first target for Russian missiles. It is expensive.

And only Russian missilemen thought about their difficult service. We need to retarget the missiles. It’s much closer to them to fly, after completing the task set by the NATO Secretary General.

Where does Europe have a common nuclear weapon?


For some of our readers, it was a revelation that Europe has a "common nuclear weapon". Indeed, any serious weapon has a master. There is nothing in common in the army. We clearly know who has nuclear weapons and who is on the way to receiving them. Everything is controlled in all countries.

So where did this notorious "common European nuclear weapon" come from?

To understand the situation, it is necessary to return to the times of the Cold War, the period of confrontation between NATO and the Internal Affairs Directorate. In fact, in an era when the United States and the USSR were competing for world domination.

It is clear that the members of both blocs were armed with weapons of Soviet or American production. Even what was produced in Europe was just a joint production. Let's remember the BMP of the Czechoslovakian production.

The blocks grew, took shape militarily, and by a certain point the Americans had the idea that the Russians would be able to quickly destroy the armies in Europe. The flight time of Russian aircraft is less than that of American aircraft from the United States. It was the end of the 50s.

And then, in order to eliminate this factor, the Americans began to import nuclear weapons to Europe. First of all, atomic bombs were brought in. Simply because for their use in NATO countries, American aircraft were already in service. According to Soviet intelligence, the total number of such bombs was close to 350.

In addition, since the end of 1958, the Americans also began to transfer short- and medium-range missiles. The first such missiles were received by the best friends of the Yankees - the British. Then there were Italy and Turkey.

Why was there no loud reaction from the USSR?

Yes, simply because the response actions of the Department of Internal Affairs were similar. We also planned to deploy nuclear weapons in Europe. But the number of warheads has not yet provided such an opportunity.

Both alliances were making far-reaching plans to arm the satellite countries with nuclear weapons. But there was a Cuban missile crisis, which just by a happy coincidence did not develop into a third world war. The leaders of the United States and the USSR suddenly realized what a terrible weapon they had in their hands. The idea of ​​nuclear nonproliferation has become popular.

In 1968, the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons was signed, which we often use in the abbreviation NPT. The USSR refused to deploy weapons in the ATS countries and began to withdraw nuclear weapons to Russia, the Americans did the same.

We talk a lot about the cunning of the American side. But on the issue of nuclear weapons, the USSR and the USA acted in the same way. The weapons were removed slowly, but new ones were not brought in. We took out the last warheads from Europe only in 1991! After the putsch, the Americans stopped exporting their own.

As of today, the exact number of bombs is unknown.

During the Soviet era, they talked about 180 or a little less. Today - from 100 to 150, in different sources.

These bombs are the "European common nuclear weapons." They are controlled by officers of the US Army, but Europeans will be used in a special period.

Why is Russia reacting so restrainedly to Stoltenberg's statement?


Indeed, why do we practically not shout about danger, why we do not threaten NATO with retaliatory actions. Yes, there were regular "concerns". But are they comparable to the danger of deploying nuclear weapons near the borders of Russia?

As usual, the answer to this question is simple.

We do not care at all about the movement of nuclear weapons in Europe. Moreover, by deploying nuclear weapons in Poland, NATO is playing on our side. The missiles located in the Kaliningrad region will reach them much faster. And we need to place missiles in any case.

Common nuclear weapons are currently deployed at several bases in Europe. All these bases, of course, have long been under the cover of our military and will be destroyed immediately, by the first missile strike, or aviation.

For information, I will name them by name:

1. Airbase "Kleine Brogel" (Belgium), has F-16A / B carriers belonging to the 10th fighter wing of the air component of the Belgian armed forces.

2. Büchel airbase (Germany). It has IDS Tornado carriers from the 33rd tactical wing of the Luftwaffe.

3. Aviano airbase (Italy). F-16C / D carriers of the 31st Fighter Wing of the United States Air Force.

4. Airbase "Gedi" (Italy). Carriers of "Tornado" IDS of the 6th wing of the Italian Air Force.

5. Airbase "Volkel" (Netherlands). Has carriers: F-16A / B of the 312th and 313rd squadrons of the RAF.

6. Airbase "Incilik" (Turkey). Here it is not clear with the carriers. The Turks do not have permanent crews of aircraft, and even the aircraft themselves at the base.

There are six goals in total.

The question arises about the number of bombs at the bases. In open sources, different numbers flash, but everything is next to the word about. Therefore, I also use the same terminology.

I will assume that the bases have approximately the same amount of ammunition.

Brief conclusions


We are used to considering any news from the alliance through the prism of NATO-Russia relations. But in this case, it seems to me that we were here by accident. The NATO secretary general openly threatened Germany, and through it, all of old Europe.

After the last elections in Germany, anything is possible. The greens are especially dangerous for the alliance. For many years this party advocated the withdrawal of atomic weapons from the territory of the FRG.

And today, having achieved significant success, they were faced with the choice to continue to advocate the withdrawal of nuclear weapons or to alienate a significant part of the voters from themselves, “forgetting” about their own demands.

Without suspecting it himself, the NATO secretary general grossly set up Europe, pleasing the United States.

Moscow has all the trump cards in its hands.

Any movement of common nuclear weapons in Europe means NATO's de facto withdrawal from the Founding Act. Europe will not want to agree to this. The instinct of self-preservation has not been canceled ...
Author:
32 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. rocket757
    rocket757 26 November 2021 15: 07
    +3
    I wonder if Europeans will ever learn to elect to important positions people who understand the value and importance of their own words?
    Is this a question or a request for something constructive?
    So far, this is a competition for the very, very ... the talker bird, is distinguished by its talkativeness and stupidity, although it has its own "three" every day!
    1. Snail N9
      Snail N9 26 November 2021 15: 15
      +5
      An interesting position of the author, NATO, in spite of all its previous promises, was going to deploy nuclear weapons in Eastern Europe, and Russia silently swallows it and it seems to be even good. Okay, uh-huh. And then we are indignant, what is it about Russia, all and sundry wipe their feet and do not take into account her opinion at all. We need to keep silent more. Yes.
      1. kamarada
        kamarada 26 November 2021 15: 55
        +4
        Show concern instead of being silent
      2. Alex_1973
        Alex_1973 26 November 2021 16: 38
        +9
        Snail N9 (Snail)
        An interesting position of the author - NATO, contrary to all its previous promises, was going to deploy nuclear weapons in eastern Europe
        What kind of nuclear weapons are we talking about? If about the nuclear bombs placed on the Tornado, then what is the difference in Germany or in Poland? The carriers are known, and in order to drop them, you need to fly to the enemy's territory, because a bomb is not a rocket and cannot fly horizontally, only vertically. Those. potential carriers of such weapons must go into the coverage area of ​​our air defense. How many of these Tornadoes will reach the target? I guess none of them will.
        And if we are talking about missiles, then where and how many were they placed? Do you have accurate data? And if not, what is your comment for? Shit for a fan and more? Well, that's your style.
        And then any attempt to strike at the territory of the Russian Federation even with non-nuclear weapons can lead to a response from Russia, including with the help of nuclear weapons. Well, who is there in the West ready to turn into radioactive ash? There are such? I strongly doubt it.
        We need to keep silent more. Yes.
        Do you know this Russian proverb: the word is silver, and silence is gold. So sometimes it is better to remain silent than to yell like you at all corners and all garbage dumps.
        1. Vladimir Mashkov
          Vladimir Mashkov 27 November 2021 13: 06
          +1
          There is panic in Europe. The State Department demands that Europe go to war with Ukraine. Europe doesn't want to. Politicians blurt out all sorts of contradictory nonsense out of place. But Russia is to blame for everything, as usual and always !!! laughing
        2. Civil
          Civil 29 November 2021 07: 23
          -1
          Moscow has all the trump cards in its hands.

          laughing our trump cards are all trump cards - One Pension Fund of Russia is worth something)
          1. ABC-schutze
            ABC-schutze 30 November 2021 14: 27
            0
            ".. our trump cards are all trump cards - One Pension Fund of Russia is worth something)"
            ************************************************** *********
            Well yes...

            Tolley business - "trump" printing press of Uncle Sam ...
    2. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 26 November 2021 15: 24
      +3
      Quote: rocket757
      So far, this is a competition for the very, very ... the talker bird, is distinguished by its talkativeness and stupidity, although it has its own "three" every day!

      And Europe knows this "talker bird" very well, and this bird is treated in the same way - "Meli Eyensulla, your week!"
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 26 November 2021 16: 00
        +4
        A classic of the genre ... he is not the first, he is not the last. So then nothing depends on him, but chatting just so harmful.
        1. tihonmarine
          tihonmarine 26 November 2021 16: 20
          +6
          Quote: rocket757
          So then nothing depends on him, but chatting just so harmful.

           The peasant is over 60, but he hasn't made any factories or ships, he needs to stay out at least until a decent NATO retirement.
    3. knn54
      knn54 26 November 2021 15: 25
      +5
      Lukashenko asked Putin for missile systems capable of carrying nuclear weapons.
      Why not.
      1. Wedmak
        Wedmak 26 November 2021 15: 29
        +4
        Will not receive, 100%. The maximum deployment of artillerymen with Iskander.
    4. bairat
      bairat 26 November 2021 15: 55
      +4
      The former general secretary was cool, as if constantly under "substances"
  2. Mouse
    Mouse 26 November 2021 15: 08
    +4
    So I can see how drooling in Poland ran ... such a maza rushing, they will pan ... wassat
  3. Wedmak
    Wedmak 26 November 2021 15: 22
    +5
    Well, in fact, what kind of danger do nuclear bombs pose for the Russian Federation? In fact, their carriers will not fly too far over our territory, because in the EU, they are all non-stealth and will shine on radar like a Christmas tree. The downside - how to distinguish a carrier with nuclear weapons from a conventional F-16 / Tornado on the radar? No way.
    Generally speaking, the purpose of keeping nuclear bombs is not very clear to me. Who are they against? An enemy without air defense is suppressed by conventional weapons, an enemy with air defense will not allow them to be used. So why are they there?
    1. abrakadabre
      abrakadabre 26 November 2021 20: 00
      +2
      Generally speaking, the purpose of keeping nuclear bombs is not very clear to me. Who are they against? An enemy without air defense is suppressed by conventional weapons, an enemy with air defense will not allow them to be used. So why are they there?
      Tradition
    2. Cetron
      Cetron 27 November 2021 00: 49
      +3
      Schaub bulo !!!
    3. dauria
      dauria 27 November 2021 11: 43
      +3
      An enemy without air defense is suppressed by conventional weapons, an enemy with air defense will not allow them to be used. So why are they there?

      Effective tactical weapon for areal targets - factories, railway junctions, bridges, airfields, ports. It is more difficult with the troops, they will be dispersed, but it will also work. ... ... And the air defense is for that and the air defense, in order to "break through" it, incurring losses. Where can you go? No one will fly with him to Moscow, this is a weapon of the depths of the front.
  4. prior
    prior 26 November 2021 15: 28
    +3
    Why is Russia reacting so restrainedly to Stoltenberg's statement?

    And to whom to answer?
    The Duma is busy with showdowns with elk meat. This is more important for the deputies than some nuclear bombs in Europe.
    Each of them probably thinks: "It's so good that Rashkin was caught, and not me." The communists are generally out. They expected from Rashkin moose shashlik, but they got a prosecutor and a full ass ...
    The rest day and night are fighting the coronavirus ...
  5. Sergey Gusak
    Sergey Gusak 26 November 2021 15: 46
    0
    I wonder if Europeans will ever learn to elect to important positions people who understand the value and importance of their own words?

    As they say, let's remember the speck and the log.
  6. parusnik
    parusnik 26 November 2021 15: 52
    +5
    "Near, near -
    Joy and misfortune.
    Need, Need
    Firm to give an answer:
    To the sunny world -
    Yes! Yes! Yes!
    Nuclear explosion -
    No! No! No with)
  7. Nafanya from the sofa
    Nafanya from the sofa 26 November 2021 15: 53
    +4
    This stoltenberg is primarily associated with the concept of "Zitz.pounder Pound" - a talking head that does not decide anything.
    You might think that the Americans, the owners of nuclear weapons, would consult with this "zits.chairmanship" when, where and how they will move / place their bombs. They would hardly even tell him about it.
    The French or the British will also not allow this "Zitsa" to command their nuclear weapons.
    So all that he chatters is an empty concussion, it is not even clear to whom.
  8. businessv
    businessv 26 November 2021 15: 54
    +2
    Europe will not want to agree to this. The instinct of self-preservation has not been canceled ...
    A good article, relevant, but the actions of the Poles and Square clearly demonstrate the complete denial of the author's statement above. smile
  9. Borisych
    Borisych 26 November 2021 16: 32
    +7
    This Soplenberg is a green parrot and a former deserter. Italian nuclear bomb carriers. this is great. Italians are generally very cool guys. We have an Italian cemetery near Stalingrad, a very large one. Romanian little - they were all buried in the ditches. There is no Hungarian cemetery as such, these reptiles were not taken prisoner, and no one cares about their graves.
  10. p0pulivox
    p0pulivox 26 November 2021 18: 38
    0
    As usual:
    And today, having achieved significant success, they were faced with the choice to continue to advocate the withdrawal of nuclear weapons or to alienate a significant part of the voters from themselves, “forgetting” about their own demands.
    Without suspecting it himself, the NATO secretary general grossly set up Europe, pleasing the United States.
    Moscow has all the trump cards in its hands
    .
    Yes, nothing special will happen and NATO will not hit the celestial axis. No new trump cards have appeared ...
  11. Undecim
    Undecim 26 November 2021 18: 58
    +8
    Enchanting analytics! What is most important in it is a complete lack of connection with reality. Absolute.
    What the NATO Secretary General said. He said that NATO agreements on the joint use of nuclear weapons are of particular importance for Europe and if the new German government withdraws from the agreement on the joint use of NATO nuclear weapons, then it, NATO, will have to look for an alternative. He went on to say that Germany has the right to decide this issue on its own and NATO will easily find another place for deployment, even in Eastern Europe.
    Who scared and destroyed whom and with what, only the author knows.
    Well, you can't sculpt such a clumsy agitprop, it also has the opposite effect.
  12. Severok
    Severok 29 November 2021 20: 39
    0
    It remains to be understood that you smoke there! (c) (Avatar) They are there, general secretaries, defense ministers in skirts, chairmen of the European Union and other Western elite - have long been tightly addicted to drugs, because such nonsense will not become a normal person in his right mind.
  13. Aleksandr97
    Aleksandr97 29 November 2021 20: 59
    +1
    Nothing has changed yet ...
    At the same time, almost 70 years of experience of the alliance's existence convinces that its main goal, formulated by the first secretary general of the British Lord G. Ismay, is "Keep Russians outside Europe, Americans in Europe, and Germans under European control" for all the sarcasticity of this formula basically remains the same. Only in the place of the Soviet Union is Russia being put in place.
    and the amendment, Germany is under US control, not the EU
  14. zenion
    zenion 29 November 2021 21: 50
    0
    Clever Churchill destroyed the British Empire, NATO will destroy Europe. If gas is not supplied to Germany, there will be a trick like with dominoes. Sprinkle from top to bottom.
  15. Fisherman
    Fisherman 1 December 2021 11: 40
    -3
    1) NATO Secretary General does not please the United States, but directly fulfills their doctrine. The "proposals" voiced by him are a method of jerking us from different directions, including informational, introducing into neurosis and misunderstanding of NATO's plans. And he is shaking the EU with his statements, on a command from the United States, so that the Germans and the French do not try to unite in making military decisions without asking the United States.
    2) At the Turkish airbase, after it was blocked by the Turks during an unsuccessful coup, the Yankees seem to have raked out nuclear weapons to themselves?
    3) I do not know about the Italians, but the British submarines have American missiles with nuclear weapons, but .... they are not in force to use them without the approval of the Pentagon. And only France has its own personal nuclear weapons, which it can apply at its own discretion.
  16. Siberian54
    Siberian54 2 December 2021 10: 40
    +1
    Daddy has already thrown a shit on them - he said that he had kept the Soviet missile systems intact and could accept YAZU with the first atomic bomb in Poshe ... And in general, he suddenly burst into a series of statements on strategic topics - the actual recognition of Crimea, the participation of the army in the event of a conflict of the Russian Federation - the outskirts are on our side .. Apparently another attempt to stop the Kiev strategists ..
  17. TINA
    TINA 10 December 2021 09: 57
    0
    Stotenberg is America's chain dog and does his job and does not work badly