The state and prospects of the US tanker fleet in the report of the Hudson Institute

10

The oldest tanker KC-135 and the modern fighter F-22A

The United States Air Force has several hundred tanker aircraft designed to expand the operational capabilities of combat aviation... However, the condition and size of such a park is already a matter of concern and action needs to be taken. On November 15, the Center for Defense Concepts and Technology of Hudson Institute published Resilient Aerial Refueling: Safeguarding the US Military's Global Reach, in which discusses current problems and suggests ways to solve them.

Non-compliance with requirements


The authors of the report note a number of problems faced by the American tanker fleet. First of all, we are talking about quantitative and qualitative indicators, as well as the specifics of the deployment and use of aircraft. Also considered are the tasks characteristic of the present time and the ability of the existing fleet of equipment to perform them with the required efficiency.



It is noted that in the past 30 years, despite the end of the Cold War, tanker aircraft continued to work actively and provided the activities of combat and special aviation. At the same time, the Pentagon considered it necessary and possible to gradually reduce the tanker fleet. If at the beginning of the nineties there were 701 aircraft of this class in service, now the Air Force uses only 473 units.


KC-10 prepares to dock with B-2A

Basis fleet of tankers are relatively old KC-135 aircraft in the amount of 379 units. Also, 50 KC-10 vehicles remain in service. In recent years, the Air Force received 47 modern KC-46A tankers and their production continues. Despite all the measures to renew the fleet, the average age of the aircraft is 52 years - the impact of a large number of old equipment and insufficient construction of new ones.

The obsolescence and obsolescence of the KC-135 and KC-10 aircraft, combined with the production problems of the new KC-46A, leads to additional risks. Old equipment has to be written off without timely replacement in sufficient quantities. Accordingly, the total size of the fleet is decreasing, which can affect the planning and conduct of operations.

The report draws attention to the fact that tanker aircraft do not exist on their own. Their activities are supported by the appropriate ground infrastructure: airfields and fuel complexes. In addition, air refueling is dependent on the supply of fuel by land or sea. The existing logistics system generally meets today's requirements, but it is already necessary to begin its development.


One of the first KC-46A tankers at work

Aircraft and politics


The background for all these processes is the change in the military-political situation in different regions. Thus, there is a significant increase in the military power of Russia and China, which is why the Pentagon needs to build up its groupings in Europe and the Indo-Pacific region. A significant place in such plans is assigned to the combat aviation of the Air Force and the Navy.

The combat effectiveness of tactical and strategic aviation in the regions under consideration directly depends on the possibility of refueling in flight. However, here again questions arise about the quantity and quality of tankers. The imperfection of the ground infrastructure is also manifested.

All this significantly reduces the real potential of combat aviation and limits its ability to fight a developed enemy. At the same time, it is obvious that the further development of the Russian and Chinese armies will exacerbate such problems. Accordingly, together with combat aviation in the region, it is necessary to develop auxiliary, incl. refuellers.

Technology Issues


The authors of the report propose a number of measures that are supposed to modernize the tanker fleet and improve its quantitative and qualitative indicators. New concepts, organizational steps, as well as promising projects and developments of various kinds are considered. The issue of financing was not ignored either: to increase the capabilities of refuellers, additional investments are required in various projects.


Possible scenario for the use of combat aircraft and tankers in the conflict in the Pacific

First of all, it is proposed to maintain the number of tankers in the ranks at the existing level and gradually increase it. To do this, it is necessary to continue purchasing new KC-46A, as well as maintaining the condition of older aircraft. In addition, it is necessary to develop fundamentally new tankers. Projects KZ and LMXT are considered in this capacity.

The KZ aircraft is called the most profitable in all respects, which is expected to be able to deliver fuel to remote areas with an optimal balance of technical, economic and performance characteristics. By purchasing from 18 to 24 such aircraft annually, the Pentagon will be able to significantly renew the entire fleet of tankers within a reasonable time frame. In particular, it will be possible to write off a significant number of the oldest KC-135 and reduce the average age of combat aircraft to 30-32 years.

At the same time, the Hudson Institute points to the ambiguous prospects for light and ultralight tankers, incl. on unmanned platforms. Such equipment has limited technical and operational characteristics, which is why it is far from fully meeting the requirements of the Air Force. At the same time, it is of great interest for carrier-based aircraft.

Not only planes


The authors of the report rightly point out that one should invest forces and funds not only in airplanes, but also in related facilities. Without renewing airfields and fuel infrastructure, the most modern tankers will not be able to realize their full potential.


Indo-Pacific airbases suitable for refueling use

The main air bases of the Indo-Pacific region are to undergo modernization. Refurbishment of fuel facilities will have to spend $ 633 million annually over the next 10 years. Further maintenance and upgrading of the infrastructure will require additional annual investments of $ 400 million. Due to these measures, the total capacity of tanker aircraft ready to perform tasks will increase by 63%.

Optimization of equipment operation processes is of great importance. In the tanker fleet, as in other areas, it is necessary to introduce modern means of communication, management and planning. Competent planning of real work, duty and routine maintenance will reduce operating costs, but maintain or even increase readiness and efficiency indicators. In addition, interaction with combat aircraft will be simplified, which will also provide certain advantages.

Problems and solutions


Resilient Aerial Refueling: Safeguarding the US Military's Global Reach reports that the American refueling fleet is currently in a specific position. While he meets the current requirements and copes with the tasks. However, in the foreseeable future, various processes are expected, as a result of which the requirements will increase.


Tanker Deployment Opportunities in Europe

It is not yet certain that the tanker fleet being modernized under the current Pentagon programs will meet the requirements of the future. To exclude a negative scenario and launch positive development processes, Center for Defense Concepts and Technology offers not individual measures, but a whole range of organizational and technical solutions. The issues of deployment and modernization of bases, organization and maintenance of service, procurement and development of new equipment, etc. were touched upon.

On the whole, the Hudson Institute's proposals look sound, and their implementation is likely to have the desired consequences. However, we are talking only about the next report from a research organization that is not directly related to the Pentagon. All this seriously limits the real prospects of the proposed park modernization project and its individual measures.

The fact is that the military department has long ago drawn up and adopted a program for the modernization of the fleet of tanker aircraft and related infrastructure. This program is being successfully implemented, although there are noticeable difficulties, and the pace of work is still insufficient. How events will develop further and whether it will be possible to fulfill all plans within the desired time frame is unknown. But one should not expect that the Pentagon, having read the latest report, will urgently revise its plans and projects that have already been launched.
  • Ryabov Kirill
  • Center for Defense Concepts and Technology, United States Air Force
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

10 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    24 November 2021 05: 12
    The US Air Force has several hundred tanker aircraft ...

    However, the state and size of such a park is already causing concern ...

    We would have their problems, how many tankers are there in the RF Aerospace Forces?
    1. +5
      24 November 2021 07: 59
      Quote: Tucan
      How many tankers are there in the RF Aerospace Forces?

      VKS 15: 5 Il-78 and 10 Il-78M

      U.S.:

      In the KMP:
      TKR 44: KC-130J Hercules + 8 in the Navy
      Reserve: TKR 21: 11 KC-130J Hercules; 10 KC-130T Hercules

      In the Air Force:
      TKR 156: 126 KC-135R Stratotanker; 30 KC-135T Stratotanker
      TKR / TPT 83: 56 KC-10A Extender; 27 KC-46A Pegasus
      Nat. Guard:
      TKR 172: 148 KC-135R Stratotanker; 24 KC-135T Stratotanker
      TKR / TPT 9 KC-46A Pegasus
      Air Force Reserve:
      TKR 70 KC-135R Stratotanker
      TKR / TPT 4 KC-46A Pegasus

      Total: 567 units + private tankers, their number is not known, I did not take into account some more.

      In storage:
      KC-135 - 119 pieces
      KS-10 - 7 pieces
      KS-130 - 35 pieces
      1. +4
        24 November 2021 09: 56
        Quote: OgnennyiKotik
        VKS 15: 5 Il-78 and 10 Il-78M

        Not all are capable. Part is under permanent repair.
        1. +4
          24 November 2021 10: 12
          The United States also has anthology, but the problem is that they have more of them to replace.
  2. +6
    24 November 2021 05: 12
    now the Air Force uses only 473 units.

    It is more painful to compare the number of AWACS aircraft in the US Air Force and the Russian Air Force.
    1. +5
      24 November 2021 08: 13
      NAVY:
      AEW & C 94: 49 E-2C Hawkeyes; 45 E-2D Hawkeye
      USAF:
      AEW & C 31: 10 E-3B Sentry; 1 E-3C Sentry; 20 E-3G Sentry

      Videoconferencing:
      AEW & C 9: 5A-50 Mainstay; 4A-50U Mainstay
      1. +5
        24 November 2021 09: 55
        Quote: OgnennyiKotik
        Videoconferencing:
        AEW & C 9: 5 A-50 Mainstay; 4 A-50U Mainstay

        This is taking into account those "in storage" or those in the ranks?
        In general, our affairs are sad with AWACS aviation. In the Far East, A-50 / A-50M appear 1-2 times a year.
        1. +2
          24 November 2021 10: 16
          Quote: Bongo

          This is taking into account those "in storage" or those in the ranks?

          Military Balance 2021 data, this is from the part where it is written how much is declared in the ranks. Naturally, it is not known how many of them are capable of taking off and performing combat missions.
      2. 0
        24 November 2021 14: 41
        The USAF doesn't have that many avacs. I thought more.
        1. 0
          24 November 2021 14: 50
          Quote: Andy J.
          The USAF doesn't have that many avacs. I thought more.

          I was also surprised by this. Especially in comparison with tankers.
  3. The comment was deleted.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"