Alexey Vishnyak: Berezovsky is behind Pussy Riot
“My blog on Echo of Moscow, called“ On the Mamontov Transfer, Berezovsky and the Transformation, ”was written by my press secretary. Over the past three days, I was under great pressure from all kinds of media that called me many times, who asked me various questions, with subtext, no subtext, and so on. I, having no experience of political polemics, very often, perhaps, spoke incorrectly and expressed something not quite as we would like.
In particular, in the blog, which is on Echo of Moscow, and I will correct it in the near future, the second paragraph reads as follows: “First, I want to say that, unfortunately, my performance in the program“ Provocateurs 2 ”was mounted that my words were put completely out of context and used to create a dubious sensation. " Everything else is written correctly. Specifically, I want to correct these three lines in such a way that my performance in the program "Providers 2" was not mounted, there was no installation there. The program did not sound a few of my phrases, which, from my point of view, are important. First: I called on Boris Abramovich to talk in the RTR studio in London. Second: I wanted, as the head of the public organization “Transformation,” to turn to Berezovsky, using the Arkady Mamontov’s transfer platform for dialogue. Third: there was no questionable sensation. That was what I said, and I said: first, that Berezovsky had declared that he would act against the Russian Orthodox Church in Tel Aviv and at other meetings; second, Berezovsky was showing me videos with PussyRiot and Tolokonnikova in a restaurant in London; third, Berezovsky sent me texts for editing to my mail, I edited them.
I have these texts in the mail regarding church issues of the Russian Orthodox Church. From this I conclude that this is not proof, but from this I conclude that Berezovsky is behind the action. Not only he, but also a number of people, but including Berezovsky is behind the action of Pussy Riot, these blasphemers. I would like to comment on this, I would like to correct it, and in no case I have never and never recanted from what I said.
I saw the headlines after my speech on the TV channel "Rain" that I had renounced my words, that I had denied them. I have never denied this. If you look at the recording of the TV channel "Rain", then you can see it, that there was no renunciation. I tried to clarify my position. But - I do not have experience in political polemics, I do not have experience in public polemics. Maybe I said something not entirely correct, although it would be very far-fetched, if all this is interpreted in the sense that I renounced it. But maybe I said something not quite clear.
Now I am saying quite clearly - yes, part of the text was cut off. Yes, I am not happy about it. I feel great about Arkady Mamontov. I do not want to label anyone, and Arkady Mamontov is a man who is far-right. Well, from my point of view. I am a person of democratic views, liberal-conservative views, but one should not, as it were, label either Arkady Mamontov or me.
And once again I want to repeat that the words that were spoken by me are justified from my point of view. From my point of view, Berezovsky is a customer, and after working with him for many years, I believe that there are good reasons for this. The fact that they are trying to present me as a strange person there, and so on - I want to ask the following question: that Boris Abramovich Berezovsky was the deputy head of the Security Council and actually the owner of such a powerful private intelligence service like Atoll. Where was Boris Abramovich before, when I was his assistant, and he did not know that I was some strange person with some strange ones stories, and so on? Well, actually, I would like you to print there. "
Information