Military Review

SAM "Buk-M3": on guard of the country's air borders

12

For the first time, a new version of the Buk anti-aircraft missile system was demonstrated at a parade in Moscow last year, 2020. This is the Buk-M3 installation, which significantly differs in its tactical and technical characteristics from the initial version of the air defense missile system. The first versions of the anti-aircraft missile system were adopted by the USSR Armed Forces more than 40 years ago. Over the years, the complex has become widespread, to this day it remains in the armaments of the armies and those countries that today can hardly be called friendly in relation to Russia.


The modern modification Buk-M3 is capable of many things. She can not only cope with a manned aviation, but also capable of shooting down various types of drones. "On the shoulder" of "Buku-M3" enemy strike drones.

Also SAM "Buk-M3" has characteristics that allow it to intercept ballistic missiles in certain parts of their trajectory.

An anti-aircraft missile system is not only about missiles. This is both the radar segment and the platform itself. For the modern version of the complex, the chassis has become more secure, its cross-country ability has increased, which makes it possible to quickly transfer the air defense system to the desired point.

The program "Military Acceptance" on the "Zvezda" channel tells about how such anti-aircraft systems are produced, what experiments are carried out on weapons before they are sent to the troops.

"Buk-M3": on guard of the country's air borders.

12 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, daily additional materials that do not get on the site: https://t.me/topwar_ru

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. d1975
    d1975 18 November 2021 17: 27
    -2
    I went to the VO website, and thought I was watching the Zvezda TV channel. Admins, what are you doing? Where is journalism?
    1. Holgerton
      Holgerton 18 November 2021 17: 45
      +3
      Journalism and analytics on VO have long been dead, with the exception of some authors from "weaponry".
      1. lucul
        lucul 18 November 2021 17: 47
        -4
        Journalism and analytics on VO have been dead for a long time, with some exceptions for the authors from "Armament".

        Can you tell the "competitors"? Huh? Don't they?
        Then what is the conversation about.
        1. Holgerton
          Holgerton 18 November 2021 19: 59
          0
          It's not about competitors, but about the quality of what is positioned as a military-analytical resource.

          Can you tell the "competitors"? Huh? Don't they?

          By this logic, you can evaluate anything, but there is little sense in this logic.
          "Is there a corrupt elite in Roskosmos? Can you tell me the competitors? Wow? They are not there? Well, then what are they talking about, let them continue to steal)."

          Then what is the conversation about.

          There is no conversation, just a statement of fact.
          1. lucul
            lucul 18 November 2021 20: 54
            +2
            By this logic, you can evaluate anything, but there is little sense in this logic.

            Cheap sketch.
            Is there a corrupt elite in Roskosmos? Can't tell your competitors? Huh? Don't they? Well then, what's the conversation, let them continue to steal). "

            NASA, no?
            There is no conversation, just a statement of fact.

            No - it's just a cheap throw.
            1. Holgerton
              Holgerton 20 November 2021 01: 23
              +2
              NASA is not in Russia and does not work for the money and the good of Russia, the great thrower) fellow

              The only cheap sketch here is your comment, which you actually confirmed by mentioning NASA, do not bother yourself with an answer - I will not read,walk dear))
  2. huntsman650
    huntsman650 19 November 2021 09: 18
    -1
    On the new ships, the only reliable and effective air defense system is Shtil, an analogue of the m3, its naval version!
    1. Alex777
      Alex777 19 November 2021 23: 25
      +2
      The only thing they have in common is the rocket.
      The RLC architecture has nothing in common.
      Therefore, the characteristics are very different:
      Target speed: BUK-M3: 3000 m / s, Calm-1: 830 m / s.
      Range: BUK-M3: 70 km, Calm-1: 50 km.
      1. huntsman650
        huntsman650 20 November 2021 00: 23
        -1
        Is this range detectable or dgzp?
        1. Alex777
          Alex777 20 November 2021 11: 46
          +1
          Range of defeat.
  3. Radikal
    Radikal 20 November 2021 00: 59
    +2
    Quote: lucul
    By this logic, you can evaluate anything, but there is little sense in this logic.

    Cheap sketch.
    Is there a corrupt elite in Roskosmos? Can't tell your competitors? Huh? Don't they? Well then, what's the conversation, let them continue to steal). "

    NASA, no?
    There is no conversation, just a statement of fact.

    No - it's just a cheap throw.

    Should we compete with NASA in this regard? Yes, we don’t care that they have the main thing for us, so that they do not steal from us! sad
  4. Usher
    Usher 21 November 2021 00: 43
    0
    Great complex. For each car there would still be smoke mortars for jamming in all ranges.