Military Review

Czech professor: The unification of Europe against Russia has already led to wars twice, and Russia won them

122
Czech professor: The unification of Europe against Russia has already led to wars twice, and Russia won them

The Czech press published a material in which the opinion of Professor Oskar Kreichi, who specializes in political science and geopolitical analysis, was presented. The main theme of the material is related to the energy crisis that Europe is facing today. According to Kreichi, today the situation for Europe is a turning point, and not in the sense that it (Europe) is trying to switch to the so-called "green energy", but in the process of de-Americanization.


The Czech expert points out that Europe has already felt how the United States can “help” it with energy resources. Answer: no way. Against the backdrop of the energy crisis, Washington simply refused to supply the EU with fuel, although it had previously argued that the stake should be placed on American LNG.

Kreichi:

As a result, Europe itself abandons the traditional conclusion of long-term contracts for the supply of gas from Russia. Does not receive liquefied gas from the United States and does not build any new power generation facilities.

According to Kreichi, against this background, the accusations against Moscow in the energy crisis are extremely doubtful. The Czech professor notes that there is not a single country in the EU that would say that Russia is not fulfilling its obligations to supply energy resources.

Oscar Kreichi says that in order to overcome the crisis in Europe, an efficient Paris-Berlin-Moscow axis must be built. This will help stabilize the situation and return the economy to a "normal" state.

At the same time, the Czech political scientist points out that if anyone is trying today to use gas as a weapons, then only not Russia, but transit countries: Ukraine, Poland.

Kreichi:

We often hear lately that if Russia refuses to do something, they will complain to Brussels, somewhere else. This is the politicization of the economy and business.

The Czech professor believes that it is time for Europe to move away from the Brzezinski principle. This principle is to oppose the unification of Eurasia.

Kreichi:

The unification of Europe against Russia has already led to tragedies and wars at least twice. It was so under Napoleon, and under Hitler too.

According to the Czech political scientist, Europe should not forget that in the end it was Russia that emerged victorious in these wars.
Photos used:
topwar.ru
122 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Dimy4
    Dimy4 13 November 2021 07: 32
    +18
    it's time to move away from the Brzezinski principle

    Yes, Brzezinski will definitely not go to war for them.
    1. Cheshire
      Cheshire 13 November 2021 08: 06
      +25
      Quote: Dimy4
      Yes, Brzezinski will definitely not go to war for them.

      It will definitely not work. He died in 2017.
      1. Dimy4
        Dimy4 13 November 2021 08: 32
        +21
        It will definitely not work. He died in 2017.

        Yes, I know. He would not have gone alive, only with his poison he sprinkled even more in all directions.
        1. bulvas
          bulvas 13 November 2021 18: 40
          -1
          There will be no order on the Planet while these devils muddy the waters.

          So we will be marking time, instead of defeating disease and hunger, we will deal with energy and ecology, and space should be properly dealt with ..

          To lock them behind the oceans with the Poseidons and the Vanguards, smoke them from the rest of the places, It is significant to drain the United Kingdom below the waterline, I don’t think that anyone will worry too much, they will also say thank you.

          There are more robots and more drones - and to Europe, to put things in order, and to unite Eurasia, until our yellow friends unite something for themselves.
          1. Shurik70
            Shurik70 13 November 2021 21: 03
            +7
            Quote: bulvas
            There will be no order on the Planet while these devils muddy the waters.

            Since 1985, these same devils have been sitting in the Russian government
            Single field berries.
            They can arrange wars with each other. But the system itself will not be allowed to break
            1. 76rtbr
              76rtbr 14 November 2021 09: 54
              +1
              Definitely !!!
          2. Mwg
            Mwg 14 November 2021 19: 54
            0
            Why go far, who instructed the same cons? Over what oceans, if here, right on the site, someone is clearly showing disagreement. And what is paradoxical, if you try to name them what they deserve, the moderator will not limit himself to a warning. Is it paradoxical? But it's a fact. Tolerance-ssss .... What about the doctors: ... the body's non-resistance to infection? something like this...
            And you swung overseas.
            1. gjkrjdybr50
              gjkrjdybr50 14 November 2021 21: 49
              +1
              MVG, with the moderator you are right. As soon as I started to press the "fellow countrymen" to the nail and recommended the moderator to take a closer look at those who turn a dispute on any topic into snot like: "Everything is gone, Putin is stealing, I clamp down all the advanced and we want freedom," so they immediately banned, and these whiners and continued their provocations and whining
              1. bulvas
                bulvas 14 November 2021 22: 02
                +1
                Quote: gjkrjdybr50
                MVG, with the moderator you are right. As soon as I started to press the "fellow countrymen" to the nail and recommended the moderator to take a closer look at those who turn a dispute on any topic into snot like: "Everything is gone, Putin is stealing, I clamp down all the advanced and we want freedom," so they immediately banned, and these whiners and continued their provocations and whining


                That is why I have not written here for a long time, sometimes I read, but rarely.
                After 5 warnings, he spat, and the ones you are talking about are usually multi-star ...
              2. Cheshire
                Cheshire 15 November 2021 07: 18
                0
                Quote: gjkrjdybr50
                MVG, with the moderator you are right. As soon as I started to press the "fellow countrymen" to the nail and recommended the moderator to take a closer look at those who turn a dispute on any topic into snot like: "Everything is gone, Putin is stealing, I clamp down all the advanced and we want freedom," so they immediately banned, and these whiners and continued their provocations and whining

                Minus you specifically from me for recommending a moderator to take a closer look. For me, it's like snitching. Further, I do not like your unwillingness to hear criticism - at least in the form of cons.
                About myself - I'm not a member of any company, I don't care about the pros and cons. I read the site for the sake of comparing opinions with the forum users respected by me. Have a nice day.
                hi
                1. gjkrjdybr50
                  gjkrjdybr50 17 November 2021 16: 04
                  +1
                  There is criticism, but there is natural snot. From experience I know that such snot are bred by those who have never commanded or supervised anything, those who are not able (afraid) to make decisions and be responsible for them, as well as people with overestimated and unrealized ambitions. You have to be real.
                  1. Cheshire
                    Cheshire 17 November 2021 19: 03
                    0
                    Quote: gjkrjdybr50
                    From experience I know that such snot are bred by those who have never commanded or supervised anything, those who are not able (afraid) to make decisions and be responsible for them, as well as people with overestimated and unrealized ambitions. You have to be real.

                    That's right, although for me this is not a reason to declare this to a moderator. I just don't communicate with such people), they are like invalids for me - in the brain. Sorry for them.
                    1. gjkrjdybr50
                      gjkrjdybr50 18 November 2021 15: 11
                      0
                      But I would not want these whiners to interfere with normal discussion and not reduce the discussion to whining. I myself cannot get it, if I got it, I could teach the Motherland to love.
                      1. Cheshire
                        Cheshire 19 November 2021 07: 00
                        0
                        Quote: gjkrjdybr50
                        I myself cannot get it, if I got it, I could teach the Motherland to love.

                        I am sure that this will lead to the exact opposite result. A person responds to aggression with aggression, this is psychology. It's easier not to pay attention to such things, ignore is much more productive. In any case, some of the users are "at work" here, and you cannot teach your homeland to love this.
                        hi
        2. Cheshire
          Cheshire 14 November 2021 19: 46
          0
          Quote: Dimy4
          Yes, I know. He would not have gone alive, only with his poison he sprinkled even more in all directions.

          Chemical weapons are prohibited, if they are poisonous, they are weapons. Although all means are good against the Russians bully
          We are not people for them.
      2. Stas157
        Stas157 13 November 2021 08: 49
        +1
        Quote: Cheshire
        He died in 2017.

        Just before his death, the dying hawk gave his last interview. In it, he admonished what the most vulnerable points should be pressed:

        ... The fact is that the entourage of Russian President Vladimir Putin so richthat a reasonable solution can only be found if this environment is compromised.

        ... Putin must think about his future. Of course, excessive concentration of the ruling elites in Russia on the acquisition of wealth can cause social reactions and hostility over time. It hasn't happened yet, but I think there is a potential risk of such trends.
        1. Alex777
          Alex777 13 November 2021 17: 07
          +3
          Are you promoting Brzezinski's dying delirium?
          he is not an "old hawk".
      3. fruc
        fruc 13 November 2021 12: 07
        +14
        He did not die, he died. It is a pity that it is not in a cesspool.
      4. Artunis
        Artunis 13 November 2021 16: 27
        +4
        Didn't die but SDOH
      5. dmmyak40
        dmmyak40 13 November 2021 17: 04
        +4
        The Poles can dig out: the experience has already worked great ... Kaczynski will confirm.
      6. sevryuk
        sevryuk 13 November 2021 17: 53
        0
        Objection! He is immortal!

        Or is it about Dostoevsky?
        1. gjkrjdybr50
          gjkrjdybr50 14 November 2021 21: 52
          0
          Dostoevsky did not give the whole world recommendations on how to destroy and rob Russia.
      7. Evil 55
        Evil 55 15 November 2021 02: 28
        0
        He died on time .. In the current situation, poisonous feces from him would have poured out 10 times more than before.
        1. gjkrjdybr50
          gjkrjdybr50 18 November 2021 15: 12
          0
          Do you measure by yourself?
    2. Vasilenko Vladimir
      Vasilenko Vladimir 13 November 2021 08: 48
      +10
      Quote: Dimy4
      Yes, Brzezinski will definitely not go to war for them.

      yes, for sure, the devils will not be released back
      1. Poetry
        Poetry 13 November 2021 12: 05
        +6
        Brzezinski is now fighting in the same platoon with Mr. McCain. 3rd company of the 295th Infernal Regiment.
  2. Cool but not Igor
    Cool but not Igor 13 November 2021 07: 34
    0
    This time, those countries that will be far from nuclear explosions will win
    1. Cowbra
      Cowbra 13 November 2021 08: 08
      +5
      United States of Antarctica? Even with Africa, the big question is geostationary. What to knock, what to launch - the hotel is easier
      1. Alf
        Alf 13 November 2021 15: 59
        +3
        Quote: Cowbra
        United States of Antarctica?

        Australia or New Zealand. There was nothing important when I was born.
        1. poquello
          poquello 13 November 2021 16: 10
          +1
          Quote: Alf
          Quote: Cowbra
          United States of Antarctica?

          Australia or New Zealand. There was nothing important when I was born.

          until we hear that the United States is going to shove nuclear submarines into New Zealand, and then who knows
    2. Lech from Android.
      Lech from Android. 13 November 2021 09: 31
      +3
      These will be the Antarkida penguins.
      1. Vladimir Mashkov
        Vladimir Mashkov 13 November 2021 11: 44
        +5
        Although the arrogant Europeans are dismissive, wary, and some with hatred towards Russia and the Russians, the most reasonable of them note the benevolence, reliability and strength of Russia. As opposed to impudent, unreliable America. Unfortunately, obedient American vassals are in power in Europe.
        1. Alex777
          Alex777 13 November 2021 17: 14
          +1
          Quote: Vladimir Mashkov
          Unfortunately, obedient American vassals are in power in Europe.

          All EU media are owned by Americans. Here is the result.
    3. seacap
      seacap 13 November 2021 11: 34
      +3
      Quote: Cool but not Igor
      This time, those countries that will be far from nuclear explosions will win

      And with whom are you going to fight with the use of nuclear weapons, I hesitate to ask, with the Balts, Poles, Ukrainians, Janissaries or Kazakhs? The fact is that the enemy who possesses nuclear weapons understands the consequences and personally will not go for direct aggression. For this he has prepared a "pack of watchdogs" and other means, no less effective and proven, like the corrupt and dependent elites, the destruction of civil society and education, economic potential, external management. Look around, this has already been largely implemented, all according to the precepts of a dead Polish immigrant, but an intelligent and insidious enemy, even after death.
      1. jonht
        jonht 14 November 2021 02: 01
        0
        Why not? The FSA is talking with might and main about the use of low-power tactical charges. We also have a lot of them. Why kill soldiers if, according to our defense doctrine, when the integrity of the state is threatened, we have the right to use nuclear weapons. So why tactical nuclear weapons, according to tribalts and paths ?! hi
    4. fruc
      fruc 13 November 2021 12: 05
      0
      Czech professor: The unification of Europe against Russia has already led to wars twice, and Russia won them

      I wish that for the third time there will be simply no one to unite.
    5. poquello
      poquello 13 November 2021 16: 05
      0
      Quote: Cool but not Igor
      This time, those countries that will be far from nuclear explosions will win

      The radiation cloud from Chernobyl reached Sweden in 2 days. 10 days after the accident, the radioactive cloud reached North America and Japan.
      1. 2 Level Advisor
        2 Level Advisor 13 November 2021 19: 02
        +2
        there was no nuclear explosion in Chernobyl .. already at least therefore, the example is incorrect ..
        1. poquello
          poquello 13 November 2021 19: 28
          0
          Quote: 2 level advisor
          there was no nuclear explosion in Chernobyl .. already at least therefore, the example is incorrect ..

          and if there was an explosion, there would be no radiation?
  3. Labrador
    Labrador 13 November 2021 07: 35
    +12
    According to the Czech political scientist, Europe should not forget that in the end it was Russia that emerged victorious in these wars.

    It turns out there are still those in the Europs who taught history! belay
    Although who will read it in Europe?
    1. Monster_Fat
      Monster_Fat 13 November 2021 09: 45
      +12
      Not in this case. Europe will never agree to close cooperation and integration with Russia, because the United States holds it (Europe) for a Faberge - "democratic" Faberge. It is curious that it was Brzezinski who said that keeping Europe in obedience is easy, easy, for this you do not even need any economic sanctions or bribery of politicians, it is enough just to accuse one or another European country of "deviating from the principles of democracy" and all this country he will immediately climb out of his skin, fulfill any requirements in order to regain the name "democratic". As soon as some European country begins to closely cooperate with Russia, they will immediately be accused of cooperation with the "anti-democratic regime" and "deviating from the principles of democracy" with all the ensuing consequences, that is, it will have no place in " the democratic world "and it can" cut off the oxygen "in terms of using everything that the" countries of democracy "have created. yes
      1. Face
        Face 13 November 2021 11: 15
        +3
        Add to this suitcases of dirt on every Euro-dog that the globalists have put at the helm.
      2. Eroma
        Eroma 15 November 2021 00: 00
        0
        By "all democratic" what can be blocked, do you mean loans?
  4. Wedmak
    Wedmak 13 November 2021 07: 46
    +6
    It is enough to look at a geographic map to understand where it is cheaper and easier to get energy resources. But the Stars and Stripes probably hid all the cards and continues to incite Europe on the next campaign to the East.
  5. Jacket in stock
    Jacket in stock 13 November 2021 07: 47
    -10
    The unification of Europe against Russia has already led to tragedies and wars at least twice. It was so under Napoleon, and under Hitler too.


    According to the Czech political scientist, Europe should not forget that in the end it was Russia that emerged victorious in these wars.


    To be honest, the wars ended with varying degrees of success.
    Once in our favor, once in their ...
    In 1991 they won.
    Well, now it should be our turn.
    I hope.
    1. Skipper
      Skipper 13 November 2021 07: 56
      +13
      In 1991, they only won the battle ... but the war continues.
      1. Blackmokona
        Blackmokona 13 November 2021 08: 38
        +1
        And supposedly in 1945 the war ended if you think so? It's just that we ended up with Germany on both sides and started a cold
        And in 1918, the French Marshal made it clear that there was an armistice for 20 years.
      2. Alex Justice
        Alex Justice 13 November 2021 10: 36
        -16
        They helped overthrow the communists and returned Russia to normal. It was only through its stupidity that Russia lost its territory.
    2. Vasilenko Vladimir
      Vasilenko Vladimir 13 November 2021 08: 49
      +8
      Quote: Jacket in stock
      In 1991 they won.

      in 91, they did not win, but we lost, and this is a big two big differences
      1. Blackmokona
        Blackmokona 13 November 2021 09: 45
        -5
        Whenever some people win, others lose. These are two sides of the same coin.
        1. Vasilenko Vladimir
          Vasilenko Vladimir 13 November 2021 14: 24
          +3
          if someone lost it doesn’t mean that someone won
          1. Blackmokona
            Blackmokona 13 November 2021 14: 28
            +2
            Russia has never in its history received such a defeat and humiliation as in 1991. This was a complete victory for the United States and Europe. Europe was able to integrate almost all the Internal Affairs Directorate and part of the western territories of the USSR. And the United States took all the influence, resources, and so on that interested them. The country has completely turned into a raw material appendage for Western corporations. A huge amount of brains were taken to the United States to work for American companies. The Cold War is over. Etc. It seems like huge wines and concrete benefits are also visible.
            Victory is always due to the fact that the winner turned out to be stronger, luckier, smarter, etc.
            And the loser is naturally the opposite. He turned out to be worse.
            In the case of the USSR, its mechanisms for motivating the population, reproducing the elite, etc., turned out to be much worse than that of the United States. Who were able to withstand the confrontation.
      2. Agent cooper
        Agent cooper 13 November 2021 12: 09
        0
        And is it easier to live with this thought? It was not my opponent who won, but I just slept badly today.
        1. Vasilenko Vladimir
          Vasilenko Vladimir 13 November 2021 14: 25
          -2
          where is it easier or harder ?!
          assessment of events
          1. Agent cooper
            Agent cooper 13 November 2021 14: 34
            -6
            So what's the problem with your assessment? The West won, the USSR lost. Any objections? No matter how much halva you say, it won't get sweeter in your mouth.
            1. Vasilenko Vladimir
              Vasilenko Vladimir 13 November 2021 14: 56
              +3
              the west did not win, that's just the point
    3. Lech from Android.
      Lech from Android. 13 November 2021 09: 34
      +14
      In 1991, there was no battle ... just a perestroika and a drunkard, in a wave of euphoria of freedom and permissiveness, poured our country down the toilet.
    4. poquello
      poquello 13 November 2021 16: 16
      +1
      Quote: Jacket in stock
      To be honest, the wars ended with varying degrees of success.
      Once in our favor, once in their ...
      In 1991 they won.

      well then and in 1917 they won too
      1. Jacket in stock
        Jacket in stock 13 November 2021 16: 44
        0
        Quote: poquello
        well then and in 1917 they won too

        Not,
        in 1918.
        Then we, in 1922, but at 21, they still chopped off half of Belarus and a piece of Ukraine.
        1. poquello
          poquello 13 November 2021 16: 58
          0
          Quote: Jacket in stock
          Quote: poquello
          well then and in 1917 they won too

          Not,
          in 1918.

          ... In these decisive days in the life of Russia, we considered it our duty of conscience to make it easier for our people to unite and unite all the forces of the people for the speedy achievement of victory, and in agreement with the State Duma, we recognized it for the good to abdicate the throne of the Russian state and resign the supreme power. ...
          May the Lord God help Russia.

          Nicholas
          Pskov. March 2, 15 p.m. 1917 g.
  6. Ryaruav
    Ryaruav 13 November 2021 07: 53
    +2
    a competent guy thinks correctly
    1. aybolyt678
      aybolyt678 13 November 2021 08: 18
      +5
      Quote: Ryaruav
      a competent guy thinks correctly

      that's why he is a professor ... but bankers know history better, during wars there is a redistribution of fortunes, the expensive becomes cheap, the cheap becomes expensive, this is their favorite game: devalue, buy up and then sell dear laughing
      1. Stas157
        Stas157 13 November 2021 09: 02
        +1
        Quote: aybolyt678
        expensive becomes cheap

        Even gold becomes cheaper during the war.
        1. aybolyt678
          aybolyt678 13 November 2021 09: 03
          +3
          Quote: Stas157
          Even gold becomes cheaper during war

          who benefits from temporarily cheap gold? that's why it is necessary to beat preventively
      2. aybolyt678
        aybolyt678 13 November 2021 20: 19
        0
        Quote: aybolyt678
        this is their favorite game: devalue, buy and then sell dear

        it turns out that bankers are history makers laughing and they do so that all the belligerents become poorer, and it is not in their interests to destroy someone forever. Whose blood should they drink?
  7. rusich
    rusich 13 November 2021 08: 00
    +4
    The political scientist remembers history well, not like politicians. Russia will be the winner for the third time. That's why she and Russia
    1. aybolyt678
      aybolyt678 13 November 2021 08: 27
      +3
      Quote: rusich
      Russia will be the winner for the third time. That's why she and Russia

      I want to remind you of the winner's dividends: for the first time the winner concluded the Brest-Litovsk Peace Treaty, for the second time Berlin was divided into 3 zones of occupation: and the winner got less than a third ...
      that's why your phrase - that's what Russia is for! smacks of sarcasm smile Unfortunately of course
      1. aybolyt678
        aybolyt678 13 November 2021 09: 03
        0
        cons, please motivate hi
  8. aybolyt678
    aybolyt678 13 November 2021 08: 04
    +9
    For the owners of the money, it doesn't matter who wins, the main thing is to rob everyone, and so many times ...
  9. Prisoner
    Prisoner 13 November 2021 08: 26
    +4
    The professor thinks, to see the real one. And the "axis Paris-Berlin-Moscow" shandarah along the ridge of the United States, it will be worse than any other axis.
    1. aybolyt678
      aybolyt678 13 November 2021 08: 30
      +1
      Quote: Captive
      shandrack the US ridge,

      How about Australia?
      1. Prisoner
        Prisoner 13 November 2021 08: 30
        +3
        laughing Where is it?
        1. aybolyt678
          aybolyt678 13 November 2021 08: 32
          +2
          Australia is a mainland country that has become part of a military bloc, and where, in case of war, the moneybags leading the wars will hide
          1. Sidor Amenpodestovich
            Sidor Amenpodestovich 13 November 2021 08: 56
            +5
            Quote: aybolyt678
            Australia is a mainland country that has become part of a military bloc, and where, in case of war, the moneybags leading the wars will hide

            Australia is behind some kind of invisible veil, which can be overcome not only by everyone, but is Australia out of reach for enemy missiles?
          2. Egoza
            Egoza 13 November 2021 09: 02
            +4
            Quote: aybolyt678
            where, in case of war, the moneybags leading the wars will hide

            They won't be in time!
  10. Avior
    Avior 13 November 2021 08: 33
    +3
    It would be strange if the venerable professor said something else
    For several years he worked as a miner and a builder, at that time he joined the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia, after which he received the opportunity to enter Charles University, from which he graduated in 1974 with a specialization in philosophy and sociology. From 1975 until the end of the communist regime, he was a secret agent of the StB, the Czechoslovak secret service. In this position, he also supervised other agents. He taught, was on long-term business trips to the USSR and the USA. For many years, simultaneously with his scientific activities, he was an employee of the state security department of the Czechoslovakia. In 1989-1990. was an advisor to two prime ministers of the communist government of Czechoslovakia - Ladislav Adamts and Marian Chalfi.
    1. carstorm 11
      carstorm 11 13 November 2021 08: 48
      +3
      Our whole life leads to some kind of conclusions in the future. It is strange, in principle, that it was this moment that attracted your attention and not the conclusions of the person themselves. Now it is fashionable, of course, not in the sense of what has been said to dig, but to look for motives. If he says that white is white, will you also go to study his past?)
      1. aybolyt678
        aybolyt678 13 November 2021 09: 45
        +2
        Quote: carstorm 11
        If he says that white is white, will you also go to study his past?)

        it's strange that he went against the mainstream ... so the motives are interesting to me, for example, too
        1. carstorm 11
          carstorm 11 13 November 2021 09: 48
          +1
          I somehow look more at the meaning of words)
          1. aybolyt678
            aybolyt678 13 November 2021 10: 21
            0
            Quote: carstorm 11
            I somehow look more at the meaning of words)

            in our information age, the meaning of words is substituted for the meaning of phenomena.
      2. Avior
        Avior 14 November 2021 04: 44
        0
        Conclusions are good when they are presented by a competent independent expert.
        In this case, the data that, due to his views and his whole life, he is clearly not an independent expert, radically change the attitude towards these "conclusions."
        Actually, what I cited should have been cited by the VO author who wrote the article, so as not to mislead the readers.
        1. carstorm 11
          carstorm 11 14 November 2021 05: 10
          -1
          Is there someone in this world independent?) Someone more, someone less. We also form our attitude to conclusions through the prism of our experience. But this does not make white black?) If the wrong person in our opinion says the right things, they will become less correct?) Maybe you should still discuss the analysis itself? Did the states help Europe in this difficult moment?) And so on)
          1. Avior
            Avior 14 November 2021 20: 52
            +1
            He does not have an analysis, but there are conclusions, at least in this article. Which is far from the same thing.
  11. Kronos
    Kronos 13 November 2021 08: 37
    -19
    So it seems that no "united" Europe fought against Russia under Napoleon and Hitler.
    1. Flooding
      Flooding 13 November 2021 08: 47
      +7
      Quote: Kronos
      against Russia under Napoleon

      there is no need even to comment
    2. Vasilenko Vladimir
      Vasilenko Vladimir 13 November 2021 08: 51
      +3
      Quote: Kronos
      So it seems that no "united" Europe fought against Russia under Napoleon and Hitler.

      Yes?!
      that only France and Germany ?!
    3. Alexey Kurilov_4
      Alexey Kurilov_4 13 November 2021 09: 13
      +9
      that's exactly LIKE Under Hitler, only Greek warriors were not on our territory Well, maybe even the principality of Monaco
    4. Alf
      Alf 13 November 2021 16: 13
      0
      Quote: Kronos
      So it seems that no "united" Europe fought against Russia under Napoleon and Hitler.



      For Dritten Reich, even look for laziness. Easier to say who was not there. Someone fought with a rifle, someone forged weapons, someone transported tungsten, and someone drove trucks through dummies.
      1. Avior
        Avior 14 November 2021 04: 48
        +1
        ... Easier to say who was not there. Someone fought with a rifle, someone forged weapons, someone transported tungsten, and someone drove trucks through dummies.

        It cannot be said that the USSR fought against Hitler alone.
        Because together with the USSR
        Easier to say who was not there. Someone fought with a rifle, someone forged weapons, someone transported tungsten, and someone drove trucks through dummies.

        smile
  12. Ros 56
    Ros 56 13 November 2021 08: 38
    +4
    If they don't listen to the professor, let them read Bismarck.

    Well and one more thing
    1. Kronos
      Kronos 13 November 2021 08: 46
      -4
      In fact, Bismarck did not write that. And because there is no such thing in his writings, and because sheer nonsense - what kind of money is this and where should Russia come if she herself always borrowed, including from Germany?
      1. Ros 56
        Ros 56 13 November 2021 08: 48
        +6
        It is not necessary to understand everything so primitively.
      2. Alexey Kurilov_4
        Alexey Kurilov_4 13 November 2021 09: 03
        +3
        Kronos. Sometimes I borrowed money, but more in the form of an indemnity. After all, territories are the most profitable currency
      3. Agent cooper
        Agent cooper 13 November 2021 12: 11
        -2
        spread fake without thinking too much. Generation of Internet Historians.
        1. parusnik
          parusnik 13 November 2021 17: 59
          +2
          spread fake without thinking too much. Generation of Internet Historians.
          Miguel de Cervantes: "Lying historians should be executed as counterfeiters."
  13. cniza
    cniza 13 November 2021 08: 55
    +4
    Oscar Kreichi says that in order to overcome the crisis in Europe, an efficient Paris-Berlin-Moscow axis must be built. This will help stabilize the situation and return the economy to a "normal" state.


    They kick a sober-minded person ...
    1. Reptiloid
      Reptiloid 13 November 2021 10: 44
      +2
      hi maybe they will not "stumble", but will agree and distort his sober thoughts beyond recognition. So, whatever is left of nothing
  14. 1536
    1536 13 November 2021 08: 56
    +3
    Well, it's all about "long-suffering" Europe. But when Russia entered into various kinds of "friendly" alliances with European countries, it suffered defeats, be it the "continental blockade" of Britain together with Napoleonic France or allied obligations within the Entente. By the way, then the Czechs made a big profit and "frolicked" on the territory of Russia in the person of the Czechoslovak corps. 100 years ago, the Czechs, as well as the brutal European pack of "allies", were barely pacified. So "there was no happiness, but misfortune helped." For twenty years before 1941, Russia made a leap forward in development, which helped it to withstand and win the Great Patriotic War. I even had to create an "anti-Hitler coalition." It is still unclear what kind of unification it was, whether the Anglo-Americans really wanted to do away with German fascism with fear once and for all, or whether it was a continuation of the "containment of Russia", when the zones of hostilities were demarcated, and then the zones of influence.
    1. Egoza
      Egoza 13 November 2021 09: 08
      +4
      Quote: 1536
      It is still unclear what kind of unification it was, whether the Anglo-Americans really wanted to do away with German fascism with fear once and for all, or whether it was a continuation of the "containment of Russia", when the zones of hostilities were demarcated, and then the zones of influence.

      They never wanted to completely crack down on fascism. To bend it under yourself, to make it "tame" - yes. It is not for nothing that so many fascists managed to "escape" to these countries. They were afraid that the USSR would grow at the expense of the Slavic peoples and the ideas of socialism. Blimey. That is why they "hurried to the rescue". Otherwise, their own peoples could revolt.
    2. Kozak Za Bugra
      Kozak Za Bugra 14 November 2021 10: 15
      +1
      Hello! I will express my observation of the events, the Americans were afraid of England.
      We are used to seeing the British and Americans as one thing, but this was not always the case.
      Before World War II, Americans feared that England:
      A. Push Japan to attack and join them
      B. Encourage Mexico to take revenge on California and support them.

      After the outbreak of World War II, the Americans were afraid that England would unite with Germany and make point A or B.
      Therefore, America helped the USSR as much as it could and even prepared to cooperate with the USSR on an equal footing, and then their president died "in time", even there are opinions in America that he was killed (in democratic America, there was already an experience of eliminating presidents supportive of Russia).
  15. Alexey Kurilov_4
    Alexey Kurilov_4 13 November 2021 08: 57
    +3
    The professor said that all politicians already know .. But to publicly admit it personally is more dear to himself .. Career obliges
  16. tihonmarine
    tihonmarine 13 November 2021 09: 36
    +2
    Oscar Kreichi says that in order to overcome the crisis in Europe, an efficient Paris-Berlin-Moscow axis must be built.
    Finally, for the first time, clever and rational words sounded from the West.
  17. ved_med12
    ved_med12 13 November 2021 09: 49
    +2
    Quote: Stas157
    Even gold becomes cheaper during the war.

    I do not agree, it is getting cheaper only on the market (by hand), but on an international scale, it only gets more expensive, as the only reliable asset!
  18. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 13 November 2021 09: 55
    +1
    The unification of Europe against Russia has already led to wars twice, and Russia won them
    Apparently, a third attempt is coming, and it is also the last one for Europe.
  19. Metallurg_2
    Metallurg_2 13 November 2021 10: 31
    +1
    Well, at least someone remembers how the wars against Russia ended.
    1. Alf
      Alf 13 November 2021 16: 21
      +2
      Quote: Metallurg_2
      Well, at least someone remembers how the wars against Russia ended.

  20. rocket757
    rocket757 13 November 2021 10: 33
    +1
    According to the Czech political scientist, Europe should not forget that in the end it was Russia that emerged victorious in these wars.
    ... And what is not so, really.
    He is not a friend or an enemy, he is just a sane person who remembers history.
    1. Reptiloid
      Reptiloid 13 November 2021 10: 53
      +2
      hi Greetings, Victor! Well, there is a sane one in Europe.
      But this does not reach domestic liberals fool in no way
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 13 November 2021 11: 04
        +2
        Hi Dmitry soldier
        The sane are everywhere!
        They keep quiet, while or at all, it happens in different ways.
        Nobody wants to play the role of Cassandra, because they REMEMBER what kind of fate such has had and always has ... as a rule, not enviable.
        He is very smart, he speaks carefully ... maybe he will carry him over, they will not kick too painfully.
        1. Reptiloid
          Reptiloid 13 November 2021 11: 15
          +2
          This is exactly the TRUTH that hurts your eyes.
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 13 November 2021 11: 33
            +1
            This is exactly what the majority should remember by definition, by the facts of not so distant events of the past.
            At the expense - pricks your eyes !? - also do not have illusions! As the same Sergienko has repeatedly stated, for them, for MANY, those were glorious pages of their history, in which they were just a little NOT LUCKY !!!
            I advise you to rely on this, and do not hope that they are ashamed there, because their ancestors went here and there, burned, ravaged and killed !!!
            Do you want to understand something, and even more so someone to blame ... try on, first, FOR YOURSELF!
            By the way, we also have something to remember about the conquests of our ancestors, the expansion of the territory of the state !!! Are you worried about that ??? Ali, as well as gay-European, do we consider this to be the glorious deeds of their ancestors?
            1. Reptiloid
              Reptiloid 13 November 2021 12: 30
              +2
              To worry or not, Victor? Then remember that it turns out that there was a struggle for survival - either we or they
              Russia survived (namely the Russians), but, unfortunately, they stopped thinking about those times of confrontation. Why? Maybe the mentality of a resident of a large territory with a long winter, maybe other reasons ...
              And those from the small European principalities? They just remember
              ... in vain they burned a little, they did not ruin everyone ...

              Something like this? Didn't think it out recourse request more
  21. opuonmed
    opuonmed 13 November 2021 11: 24
    0
    that country will win, which will not allow much damage and which will quickly recover within itself!
  22. rotfuks
    rotfuks 13 November 2021 12: 01
    +1
    But there were times when Russia worked closely with Europe. When the Moscow-Berlin-Paris axis worked perfectly. True, this was at a time when herds of bison were running across America, and the ancestors of Bzezhinsky still lived in Europe and worked as shoemakers or tailors. And it was only that 300 years ago.
    1. Blackmokona
      Blackmokona 13 November 2021 14: 35
      0
      300 years ago, when all of Western Europe drenched each other in the War of the Spanish Succession. And Eastern Europe fought desperately trying to saw off Sweden, which turned out to be a tough nut to crack?
  23. George Koval
    George Koval 13 November 2021 19: 05
    -1
    The third time you have to go to the Channel and not forget about the states. Our humanity goes sideways for us: the unfinished Banderaites have been revived and the collective West, as before, provokes another world war ...
    1. Maxim Shalak
      Maxim Shalak 14 November 2021 06: 22
      0
      Long ago from the front? I look at the fighting mood, do you want to fight?
  24. Anachoret
    Anachoret 13 November 2021 20: 28
    0
    Quote: frruc
    He did not die, he died. It is a pity that it is not in a cesspool.

    Fsfae climbed a hollow, lech and zdoh)
    And all the impudent Saxon monsters and their hangers-on will go there too))
  25. Maxim Shalak
    Maxim Shalak 14 November 2021 06: 21
    0
    Wars were won not by Russia, but by the Russian Empire and the USSR. And these were countries with completely different resources and capabilities. We shouldn't be puffed up now and try to cover the enemy with our caps.
  26. Thomas the Unbelieving
    Thomas the Unbelieving 14 November 2021 10: 01
    0
    This is true, but not all. Forgotten the Swedes with the Poles, and the Teutonic Order. In general, I would like to remind Tyutchev: Vain labor - no one can’t reason with them- The more liberal, the more vulgar, Civilization is a fetish for them, But their idea is inaccessible to them No matter how you bend in front of her, gentlemen, you will not win recognition from Europe In her eyes you will always be Not servants of enlightenment, but slaves. May, 1867.
  27. musorg
    musorg 14 November 2021 11: 55
    0
    I would like to experience it for the third time, but this is the last, from the word at all! Only ash will remain from Geyropa, which will be blown away by the wind.
  28. KADINIK
    KADINIK 14 November 2021 13: 22
    0
    It is a pity that no one else reads this professor in Europe except us. Young Europeans know for sure that Napoleon was defeated by England, and Hitler by the United States. And also a professor.