Czech professor: The unification of Europe against Russia has already led to wars twice, and Russia won them

The Czech press published a material in which the opinion of Professor Oskar Kreichi, who specializes in political science and geopolitical analysis, was presented. The main theme of the material is related to the energy crisis that Europe is facing today. According to Kreichi, today the situation for Europe is a turning point, and not in the sense that it (Europe) is trying to switch to the so-called "green energy", but in the process of de-Americanization.

The Czech expert points out that Europe has already felt how the United States can “help” it with energy resources. Answer: no way. Against the backdrop of the energy crisis, Washington simply refused to supply the EU with fuel, although it had previously argued that the stake should be placed on American LNG.

Kreichi:

As a result, Europe itself abandons the traditional conclusion of long-term contracts for the supply of gas from Russia. Does not receive liquefied gas from the United States and does not build any new power generation facilities.

According to Kreichi, against this background, the accusations against Moscow in the energy crisis are extremely doubtful. The Czech professor notes that there is not a single country in the EU that would say that Russia is not fulfilling its obligations to supply energy resources.

Oscar Kreichi says that in order to overcome the crisis in Europe, an efficient Paris-Berlin-Moscow axis must be built. This will help stabilize the situation and return the economy to a "normal" state.

At the same time, the Czech political scientist points out that if anyone is trying today to use gas as a weapons, then only not Russia, but transit countries: Ukraine, Poland.

Kreichi:

We often hear lately that if Russia refuses to do something, they will complain to Brussels, somewhere else. This is the politicization of the economy and business.

The Czech professor believes that it is time for Europe to move away from the Brzezinski principle. This principle is to oppose the unification of Eurasia.

Kreichi:

The unification of Europe against Russia has already led to tragedies and wars at least twice. It was so under Napoleon, and under Hitler too.

According to the Czech political scientist, Europe should not forget that in the end it was Russia that emerged victorious in these wars.

Comments

[Dimy4]

it's time to move away from the Brzezinski principle

Yes, Brzezinski will definitely not go to war for them.

[Cheshire]

Quote: Dimy4

Yes, Brzezinski will definitely not go to war for them.

It will definitely not work. He died in 2017.

[Dimy4]

It will definitely not work. He died in 2017.

Yes, I know. He would not have gone alive, only with his poison he sprinkled even more in all directions.

[bulvas]

There will be no order on the Planet while these devils muddy the waters.

So we will be marking time, instead of defeating disease and hunger, we will deal with energy and ecology, and space should be properly dealt with ..

To lock them behind the oceans with the Poseidons and the Vanguards, smoke them from the rest of the places, It is significant to drain the United Kingdom below the waterline, I don’t think that anyone will worry too much, they will also say thank you.

There are more robots and more drones - and to Europe, to put things in order, and to unite Eurasia, until our yellow friends unite something for themselves.

[Shurik70]

Quote: bulvas

There will be no order on the Planet while these devils muddy the waters.

Since 1985, these same devils have been sitting in the Russian government
Single field berries.
They can arrange wars with each other. But the system itself will not be allowed to break

[76rtbr]

Definitely !!!

[Mwg]

Why go far, who instructed the same cons? Over what oceans, if here, right on the site, someone is clearly showing disagreement. And what is paradoxical, if you try to name them what they deserve, the moderator will not limit himself to a warning. Is it paradoxical? But it's a fact. Tolerance-ssss .... What about the doctors: ... the body's non-resistance to infection? something like this...
And you swung overseas.

[gjkrjdybr50]

MVG, with the moderator you are right. As soon as I started to press the "fellow countrymen" to the nail and recommended the moderator to take a closer look at those who turn a dispute on any topic into snot like: "Everything is gone, Putin is stealing, I clamp down all the advanced and we want freedom," so they immediately banned, and these whiners and continued their provocations and whining

[bulvas]

Quote: gjkrjdybr50

MVG, with the moderator you are right. As soon as I started to press the "fellow countrymen" to the nail and recommended the moderator to take a closer look at those who turn a dispute on any topic into snot like: "Everything is gone, Putin is stealing, I clamp down all the advanced and we want freedom," so they immediately banned, and these whiners and continued their provocations and whining

That is why I have not written here for a long time, sometimes I read, but rarely.
After 5 warnings, he spat, and the ones you are talking about are usually multi-star ...

[Cheshire]

Quote: gjkrjdybr50

MVG, with the moderator you are right. As soon as I started to press the "fellow countrymen" to the nail and recommended the moderator to take a closer look at those who turn a dispute on any topic into snot like: "Everything is gone, Putin is stealing, I clamp down all the advanced and we want freedom," so they immediately banned, and these whiners and continued their provocations and whining

Minus you specifically from me for recommending a moderator to take a closer look. For me, it's like snitching. Further, I do not like your unwillingness to hear criticism - at least in the form of cons.
About myself - I'm not a member of any company, I don't care about the pros and cons. I read the site for the sake of comparing opinions with the forum users respected by me. Have a nice day.

[gjkrjdybr50]

There is criticism, but there is natural snot. From experience I know that such snot are bred by those who have never commanded or supervised anything, those who are not able (afraid) to make decisions and be responsible for them, as well as people with overestimated and unrealized ambitions. You have to be real.

[Cheshire]

Quote: gjkrjdybr50

From experience I know that such snot are bred by those who have never commanded or supervised anything, those who are not able (afraid) to make decisions and be responsible for them, as well as people with overestimated and unrealized ambitions. You have to be real.

That's right, although for me this is not a reason to declare this to a moderator. I just don't communicate with such people), they are like invalids for me - in the brain. Sorry for them.

[gjkrjdybr50]

But I would not want these whiners to interfere with normal discussion and not reduce the discussion to whining. I myself cannot get it, if I got it, I could teach the Motherland to love.

[Cheshire]

Quote: gjkrjdybr50

I myself cannot get it, if I got it, I could teach the Motherland to love.

I am sure that this will lead to the exact opposite result. A person responds to aggression with aggression, this is psychology. It's easier not to pay attention to such things, ignore is much more productive. In any case, some of the users are "at work" here, and you cannot teach your homeland to love this.

[Cheshire]

Quote: Dimy4

Yes, I know. He would not have gone alive, only with his poison he sprinkled even more in all directions.

Chemical weapons are prohibited, if they are poisonous, they are weapons. Although all means are good against the Russians
We are not people for them.

[Stas157]

Quote: Cheshire

He died in 2017.

Just before his death, the dying hawk gave his last interview. In it, he admonished what the most vulnerable points should be pressed:

... The fact is that the entourage of Russian President Vladimir Putin so richthat a reasonable solution can only be found if this environment is compromised.

... Putin must think about his future. Of course, excessive concentration of the ruling elites in Russia on the acquisition of wealth can cause social reactions and hostility over time. It hasn't happened yet, but I think there is a potential risk of such trends.

[Alex777]

Are you promoting Brzezinski's dying delirium?
he is not an "old hawk".

[fruc]

He did not die, he died. It is a pity that it is not in a cesspool.

[Artunis]

Didn't die but SDOH

[dmmyak40]

The Poles can dig out: the experience has already worked great ... Kaczynski will confirm.

[sevryuk]

Objection! He is immortal!

Or is it about Dostoevsky?

[gjkrjdybr50]

Dostoevsky did not give the whole world recommendations on how to destroy and rob Russia.

[Evil 55]

He died on time .. In the current situation, poisonous feces from him would have poured out 10 times more than before.

[gjkrjdybr50]

Do you measure by yourself?

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

Quote: Dimy4

Yes, Brzezinski will definitely not go to war for them.

yes, for sure, the devils will not be released back

[Poetry]

Brzezinski is now fighting in the same platoon with Mr. McCain. 3rd company of the 295th Infernal Regiment.

[Cool but not Igor]

This time, those countries that will be far from nuclear explosions will win

[Cowbra]

United States of Antarctica? Even with Africa, the big question is geostationary. What to knock, what to launch - the hotel is easier

[Alf]

Quote: Cowbra

United States of Antarctica?

Australia or New Zealand. There was nothing important when I was born.

[poquello]

Quote: Alf

Quote: Cowbra

United States of Antarctica?

Australia or New Zealand. There was nothing important when I was born.

until we hear that the United States is going to shove nuclear submarines into New Zealand, and then who knows

[Lech from Android.]

These will be the Antarkida penguins.

[Vladimir Mashkov]

Although the arrogant Europeans are dismissive, wary, and some with hatred towards Russia and the Russians, the most reasonable of them note the benevolence, reliability and strength of Russia. As opposed to impudent, unreliable America. Unfortunately, obedient American vassals are in power in Europe.

[Alex777]

Quote: Vladimir Mashkov

Unfortunately, obedient American vassals are in power in Europe.

All EU media are owned by Americans. Here is the result.

[seacap]

Quote: Cool but not Igor

This time, those countries that will be far from nuclear explosions will win

And with whom are you going to fight with the use of nuclear weapons, I hesitate to ask, with the Balts, Poles, Ukrainians, Janissaries or Kazakhs? The fact is that the enemy who possesses nuclear weapons understands the consequences and personally will not go for direct aggression. For this he has prepared a "pack of watchdogs" and other means, no less effective and proven, like the corrupt and dependent elites, the destruction of civil society and education, economic potential, external management. Look around, this has already been largely implemented, all according to the precepts of a dead Polish immigrant, but an intelligent and insidious enemy, even after death.

[jonht]

Why not? The FSA is talking with might and main about the use of low-power tactical charges. We also have a lot of them. Why kill soldiers if, according to our defense doctrine, when the integrity of the state is threatened, we have the right to use nuclear weapons. So why tactical nuclear weapons, according to tribalts and paths ?!

[fruc]

Czech professor: The unification of Europe against Russia has already led to wars twice, and Russia won them

I wish that for the third time there will be simply no one to unite.

[poquello]

Quote: Cool but not Igor

This time, those countries that will be far from nuclear explosions will win

The radiation cloud from Chernobyl reached Sweden in 2 days. 10 days after the accident, the radioactive cloud reached North America and Japan.

[2 Level Advisor]

there was no nuclear explosion in Chernobyl .. already at least therefore, the example is incorrect ..

[poquello]

Quote: 2 level advisor

there was no nuclear explosion in Chernobyl .. already at least therefore, the example is incorrect ..

and if there was an explosion, there would be no radiation?

[Labrador]

According to the Czech political scientist, Europe should not forget that in the end it was Russia that emerged victorious in these wars.

It turns out there are still those in the Europs who taught history!
Although who will read it in Europe?

[Monster_Fat]

Not in this case. Europe will never agree to close cooperation and integration with Russia, because the United States holds it (Europe) for a Faberge - "democratic" Faberge. It is curious that it was Brzezinski who said that keeping Europe in obedience is easy, easy, for this you do not even need any economic sanctions or bribery of politicians, it is enough just to accuse one or another European country of "deviating from the principles of democracy" and all this country he will immediately climb out of his skin, fulfill any requirements in order to regain the name "democratic". As soon as some European country begins to closely cooperate with Russia, they will immediately be accused of cooperation with the "anti-democratic regime" and "deviating from the principles of democracy" with all the ensuing consequences, that is, it will have no place in " the democratic world "and it can" cut off the oxygen "in terms of using everything that the" countries of democracy "have created.

[Face]

Add to this suitcases of dirt on every Euro-dog that the globalists have put at the helm.

[Eroma]

By "all democratic" what can be blocked, do you mean loans?

[Wedmak]

It is enough to look at a geographic map to understand where it is cheaper and easier to get energy resources. But the Stars and Stripes probably hid all the cards and continues to incite Europe on the next campaign to the East.

[Jacket in stock]

The unification of Europe against Russia has already led to tragedies and wars at least twice. It was so under Napoleon, and under Hitler too.


According to the Czech political scientist, Europe should not forget that in the end it was Russia that emerged victorious in these wars.

To be honest, the wars ended with varying degrees of success.
Once in our favor, once in their ...
In 1991 they won.
Well, now it should be our turn.
I hope.

[Skipper]

In 1991, they only won the battle ... but the war continues.

[Blackmokona]

And supposedly in 1945 the war ended if you think so? It's just that we ended up with Germany on both sides and started a cold
And in 1918, the French Marshal made it clear that there was an armistice for 20 years.

[Alex Justice]

They helped overthrow the communists and returned Russia to normal. It was only through its stupidity that Russia lost its territory.

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

Quote: Jacket in stock

In 1991 they won.

in 91, they did not win, but we lost, and this is a big two big differences

[Blackmokona]

Whenever some people win, others lose. These are two sides of the same coin.

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

if someone lost it doesn’t mean that someone won

[Blackmokona]

Russia has never in its history received such a defeat and humiliation as in 1991. This was a complete victory for the United States and Europe. Europe was able to integrate almost all the Internal Affairs Directorate and part of the western territories of the USSR. And the United States took all the influence, resources, and so on that interested them. The country has completely turned into a raw material appendage for Western corporations. A huge amount of brains were taken to the United States to work for American companies. The Cold War is over. Etc. It seems like huge wines and concrete benefits are also visible.
Victory is always due to the fact that the winner turned out to be stronger, luckier, smarter, etc.
And the loser is naturally the opposite. He turned out to be worse.
In the case of the USSR, its mechanisms for motivating the population, reproducing the elite, etc., turned out to be much worse than that of the United States. Who were able to withstand the confrontation.

[Agent cooper]

And is it easier to live with this thought? It was not my opponent who won, but I just slept badly today.

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

where is it easier or harder ?!
assessment of events

[Agent cooper]

So what's the problem with your assessment? The West won, the USSR lost. Any objections? No matter how much halva you say, it won't get sweeter in your mouth.

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

the west did not win, that's just the point

[Lech from Android.]

In 1991, there was no battle ... just a perestroika and a drunkard, in a wave of euphoria of freedom and permissiveness, poured our country down the toilet.

[poquello]

Quote: Jacket in stock

To be honest, the wars ended with varying degrees of success.
Once in our favor, once in their ...
In 1991 they won.

well then and in 1917 they won too

[Jacket in stock]

Quote: poquello

well then and in 1917 they won too

Not,
in 1918.
Then we, in 1922, but at 21, they still chopped off half of Belarus and a piece of Ukraine.

[poquello]

Quote: Jacket in stock

Quote: poquello

well then and in 1917 they won too

Not,
in 1918.

... In these decisive days in the life of Russia, we considered it our duty of conscience to make it easier for our people to unite and unite all the forces of the people for the speedy achievement of victory, and in agreement with the State Duma, we recognized it for the good to abdicate the throne of the Russian state and resign the supreme power. ...
May the Lord God help Russia.

Nicholas
Pskov. March 2, 15 p.m. 1917 g.

[Ryaruav]

a competent guy thinks correctly

[aybolyt678]

Quote: Ryaruav

a competent guy thinks correctly

that's why he is a professor ... but bankers know history better, during wars there is a redistribution of fortunes, the expensive becomes cheap, the cheap becomes expensive, this is their favorite game: devalue, buy up and then sell dear

[Stas157]

Quote: aybolyt678

expensive becomes cheap

Even gold becomes cheaper during the war.

[aybolyt678]

Quote: Stas157

Even gold becomes cheaper during war

who benefits from temporarily cheap gold? that's why it is necessary to beat preventively

[aybolyt678]

Quote: aybolyt678

this is their favorite game: devalue, buy and then sell dear

it turns out that bankers are history makers and they do so that all the belligerents become poorer, and it is not in their interests to destroy someone forever. Whose blood should they drink?

[rusich]

The political scientist remembers history well, not like politicians. Russia will be the winner for the third time. That's why she and Russia

[aybolyt678]

Quote: rusich

Russia will be the winner for the third time. That's why she and Russia

I want to remind you of the winner's dividends: for the first time the winner concluded the Brest-Litovsk Peace Treaty, for the second time Berlin was divided into 3 zones of occupation: and the winner got less than a third ...
that's why your phrase - that's what Russia is for! smacks of sarcasm Unfortunately of course

[aybolyt678]

cons, please motivate

[aybolyt678]

For the owners of the money, it doesn't matter who wins, the main thing is to rob everyone, and so many times ...

[Prisoner]

The professor thinks, to see the real one. And the "axis Paris-Berlin-Moscow" shandarah along the ridge of the United States, it will be worse than any other axis.

[aybolyt678]

Quote: Captive

shandrack the US ridge,

How about Australia?

[Prisoner]

Where is it?

[aybolyt678]

Australia is a mainland country that has become part of a military bloc, and where, in case of war, the moneybags leading the wars will hide

[Sidor Amenpodestovich]

Quote: aybolyt678

Australia is a mainland country that has become part of a military bloc, and where, in case of war, the moneybags leading the wars will hide

Australia is behind some kind of invisible veil, which can be overcome not only by everyone, but is Australia out of reach for enemy missiles?

[Egoza]

Quote: aybolyt678

where, in case of war, the moneybags leading the wars will hide

They won't be in time!

[Avior]

It would be strange if the venerable professor said something else

For several years he worked as a miner and a builder, at that time he joined the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia, after which he received the opportunity to enter Charles University, from which he graduated in 1974 with a specialization in philosophy and sociology. From 1975 until the end of the communist regime, he was a secret agent of the StB, the Czechoslovak secret service. In this position, he also supervised other agents. He taught, was on long-term business trips to the USSR and the USA. For many years, simultaneously with his scientific activities, he was an employee of the state security department of the Czechoslovakia. In 1989-1990. was an advisor to two prime ministers of the communist government of Czechoslovakia - Ladislav Adamts and Marian Chalfi.

[carstorm 11]

Our whole life leads to some kind of conclusions in the future. It is strange, in principle, that it was this moment that attracted your attention and not the conclusions of the person themselves. Now it is fashionable, of course, not in the sense of what has been said to dig, but to look for motives. If he says that white is white, will you also go to study his past?)

[aybolyt678]

Quote: carstorm 11

If he says that white is white, will you also go to study his past?)

it's strange that he went against the mainstream ... so the motives are interesting to me, for example, too

[carstorm 11]

I somehow look more at the meaning of words)

[aybolyt678]

Quote: carstorm 11

I somehow look more at the meaning of words)

in our information age, the meaning of words is substituted for the meaning of phenomena.

[Avior]

Conclusions are good when they are presented by a competent independent expert.
In this case, the data that, due to his views and his whole life, he is clearly not an independent expert, radically change the attitude towards these "conclusions."
Actually, what I cited should have been cited by the VO author who wrote the article, so as not to mislead the readers.

[carstorm 11]

Is there someone in this world independent?) Someone more, someone less. We also form our attitude to conclusions through the prism of our experience. But this does not make white black?) If the wrong person in our opinion says the right things, they will become less correct?) Maybe you should still discuss the analysis itself? Did the states help Europe in this difficult moment?) And so on)

[Avior]

He does not have an analysis, but there are conclusions, at least in this article. Which is far from the same thing.

[Kronos]

So it seems that no "united" Europe fought against Russia under Napoleon and Hitler.

[Flooding]

Quote: Kronos

against Russia under Napoleon

there is no need even to comment

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

Quote: Kronos

So it seems that no "united" Europe fought against Russia under Napoleon and Hitler.

Yes?!
that only France and Germany ?!

[Alexey Kurilov_4]

that's exactly LIKE Under Hitler, only Greek warriors were not on our territory Well, maybe even the principality of Monaco

[Alf]

Quote: Kronos

So it seems that no "united" Europe fought against Russia under Napoleon and Hitler.

For Dritten Reich, even look for laziness. Easier to say who was not there. Someone fought with a rifle, someone forged weapons, someone transported tungsten, and someone drove trucks through dummies.

[Avior]

... Easier to say who was not there. Someone fought with a rifle, someone forged weapons, someone transported tungsten, and someone drove trucks through dummies.

It cannot be said that the USSR fought against Hitler alone.
Because together with the USSR

Easier to say who was not there. Someone fought with a rifle, someone forged weapons, someone transported tungsten, and someone drove trucks through dummies.

[Ros 56]

If they don't listen to the professor, let them read Bismarck.

Well and one more thing

[Kronos]

In fact, Bismarck did not write that. And because there is no such thing in his writings, and because sheer nonsense - what kind of money is this and where should Russia come if she herself always borrowed, including from Germany?

[Ros 56]

It is not necessary to understand everything so primitively.

[Alexey Kurilov_4]

Kronos. Sometimes I borrowed money, but more in the form of an indemnity. After all, territories are the most profitable currency

[Agent cooper]

spread fake without thinking too much. Generation of Internet Historians.

[parusnik]

spread fake without thinking too much. Generation of Internet Historians.

Miguel de Cervantes: "Lying historians should be executed as counterfeiters."

[cniza]

Oscar Kreichi says that in order to overcome the crisis in Europe, an efficient Paris-Berlin-Moscow axis must be built. This will help stabilize the situation and return the economy to a "normal" state.

They kick a sober-minded person ...

[Reptiloid]

maybe they will not "stumble", but will agree and distort his sober thoughts beyond recognition. So, whatever is left of nothing

[1536]

Well, it's all about "long-suffering" Europe. But when Russia entered into various kinds of "friendly" alliances with European countries, it suffered defeats, be it the "continental blockade" of Britain together with Napoleonic France or allied obligations within the Entente. By the way, then the Czechs made a big profit and "frolicked" on the territory of Russia in the person of the Czechoslovak corps. 100 years ago, the Czechs, as well as the brutal European pack of "allies", were barely pacified. So "there was no happiness, but misfortune helped." For twenty years before 1941, Russia made a leap forward in development, which helped it to withstand and win the Great Patriotic War. I even had to create an "anti-Hitler coalition." It is still unclear what kind of unification it was, whether the Anglo-Americans really wanted to do away with German fascism with fear once and for all, or whether it was a continuation of the "containment of Russia", when the zones of hostilities were demarcated, and then the zones of influence.

[Egoza]

Quote: 1536

It is still unclear what kind of unification it was, whether the Anglo-Americans really wanted to do away with German fascism with fear once and for all, or whether it was a continuation of the "containment of Russia", when the zones of hostilities were demarcated, and then the zones of influence.

They never wanted to completely crack down on fascism. To bend it under yourself, to make it "tame" - yes. It is not for nothing that so many fascists managed to "escape" to these countries. They were afraid that the USSR would grow at the expense of the Slavic peoples and the ideas of socialism. Blimey. That is why they "hurried to the rescue". Otherwise, their own peoples could revolt.

[Kozak Za Bugra]

Hello! I will express my observation of the events, the Americans were afraid of England.
We are used to seeing the British and Americans as one thing, but this was not always the case.
Before World War II, Americans feared that England:
A. Push Japan to attack and join them
B. Encourage Mexico to take revenge on California and support them.

After the outbreak of World War II, the Americans were afraid that England would unite with Germany and make point A or B.
Therefore, America helped the USSR as much as it could and even prepared to cooperate with the USSR on an equal footing, and then their president died "in time", even there are opinions in America that he was killed (in democratic America, there was already an experience of eliminating presidents supportive of Russia).

[Alexey Kurilov_4]

The professor said that all politicians already know .. But to publicly admit it personally is more dear to himself .. Career obliges

[tihonmarine]

Oscar Kreichi says that in order to overcome the crisis in Europe, an efficient Paris-Berlin-Moscow axis must be built.

Finally, for the first time, clever and rational words sounded from the West.

[ved_med12]

Quote: Stas157

Even gold becomes cheaper during the war.

I do not agree, it is getting cheaper only on the market (by hand), but on an international scale, it only gets more expensive, as the only reliable asset!

[rotmistr60]

The unification of Europe against Russia has already led to wars twice, and Russia won them

Apparently, a third attempt is coming, and it is also the last one for Europe.

[Metallurg_2]

Well, at least someone remembers how the wars against Russia ended.

[Alf]

Quote: Metallurg_2

Well, at least someone remembers how the wars against Russia ended.

[rocket757]

According to the Czech political scientist, Europe should not forget that in the end it was Russia that emerged victorious in these wars.

... And what is not so, really.
He is not a friend or an enemy, he is just a sane person who remembers history.

[Reptiloid]

Greetings, Victor! Well, there is a sane one in Europe.
But this does not reach domestic liberals in no way

[rocket757]

Hi Dmitry
The sane are everywhere!
They keep quiet, while or at all, it happens in different ways.
Nobody wants to play the role of Cassandra, because they REMEMBER what kind of fate such has had and always has ... as a rule, not enviable.
He is very smart, he speaks carefully ... maybe he will carry him over, they will not kick too painfully.

[Reptiloid]

This is exactly the TRUTH that hurts your eyes.

[rocket757]

This is exactly what the majority should remember by definition, by the facts of not so distant events of the past.
At the expense - pricks your eyes !? - also do not have illusions! As the same Sergienko has repeatedly stated, for them, for MANY, those were glorious pages of their history, in which they were just a little NOT LUCKY !!!
I advise you to rely on this, and do not hope that they are ashamed there, because their ancestors went here and there, burned, ravaged and killed !!!
Do you want to understand something, and even more so someone to blame ... try on, first, FOR YOURSELF!
By the way, we also have something to remember about the conquests of our ancestors, the expansion of the territory of the state !!! Are you worried about that ??? Ali, as well as gay-European, do we consider this to be the glorious deeds of their ancestors?

[Reptiloid]

To worry or not, Victor? Then remember that it turns out that there was a struggle for survival - either we or they
Russia survived (namely the Russians), but, unfortunately, they stopped thinking about those times of confrontation. Why? Maybe the mentality of a resident of a large territory with a long winter, maybe other reasons ...
And those from the small European principalities? They just remember

... in vain they burned a little, they did not ruin everyone ...

Something like this? Didn't think it out more

[opuonmed]

that country will win, which will not allow much damage and which will quickly recover within itself!

[rotfuks]

But there were times when Russia worked closely with Europe. When the Moscow-Berlin-Paris axis worked perfectly. True, this was at a time when herds of bison were running across America, and the ancestors of Bzezhinsky still lived in Europe and worked as shoemakers or tailors. And it was only that 300 years ago.

[Blackmokona]

300 years ago, when all of Western Europe drenched each other in the War of the Spanish Succession. And Eastern Europe fought desperately trying to saw off Sweden, which turned out to be a tough nut to crack?

[George Koval]

The third time you have to go to the Channel and not forget about the states. Our humanity goes sideways for us: the unfinished Banderaites have been revived and the collective West, as before, provokes another world war ...

[Maxim Shalak]

Long ago from the front? I look at the fighting mood, do you want to fight?

[Anachoret]

Quote: frruc

He did not die, he died. It is a pity that it is not in a cesspool.

Fsfae climbed a hollow, lech and zdoh)
And all the impudent Saxon monsters and their hangers-on will go there too))

[Maxim Shalak]

Wars were won not by Russia, but by the Russian Empire and the USSR. And these were countries with completely different resources and capabilities. We shouldn't be puffed up now and try to cover the enemy with our caps.

[Thomas the Unbelieving]

This is true, but not all. Forgotten the Swedes with the Poles, and the Teutonic Order. In general, I would like to remind Tyutchev: Vain labor - no one can’t reason with them- The more liberal, the more vulgar, Civilization is a fetish for them, But their idea is inaccessible to them No matter how you bend in front of her, gentlemen, you will not win recognition from Europe In her eyes you will always be Not servants of enlightenment, but slaves. May, 1867.

[musorg]

I would like to experience it for the third time, but this is the last, from the word at all! Only ash will remain from Geyropa, which will be blown away by the wind.

[KADINIK]

It is a pity that no one else reads this professor in Europe except us. Young Europeans know for sure that Napoleon was defeated by England, and Hitler by the United States. And also a professor.