Armed and dangerous: bombs and missiles for the PAK YES

58

Looking to the West


A prototype of a promising Russian strategic bomber of a new generation should be assembled in the foreseeable future, namely, by 2023. The aircraft will be subsonic, unobtrusive and built according to the aerodynamic "flying wing" configuration. Simply put, it will become a conditional analogue of the American B-2, as well as the promising B-21 Raider, which will have to make its first flight in the next few years.


More detailed information about the PAK DA has not been presented until today, however, if you summarize all the sources, then you can draw some conclusions. Most likely, the aircraft will have a take-off weight of approximately 145 tons and a payload in the region of 20-30 tons. The flight range will be up to 15 thousand kilometers without refueling.



In the last article, we have tried compare PAK DA with promising foreign "strategists", namely, the aforementioned B-21, as well as the Chinese H-20. Today we will try to understand what weapon will carry a promising aviation long-range aviation complex.

Air-to-surface weapons


Weapons are the main component of any strategic bomber. That without which the whole structure, no matter how perfect it is, is devoid of meaning. The very concept of a combat vehicle of this class is "sharpened" in order to deliver a certain combat load at a certain distance. Little has changed here over the past decades: in a broad sense, of course.

The new aircraft is positioned as a multifunctional vehicle.

“PAK DA will be a subsonic flying platform for the use of various types of missile systems from areas outside the enemy's air defense. These can be zones over the Pacific Ocean, zones over the Atlantic, over the North Pole ", - Dmitry Kornev, editor-in-chief of the MilitaryRussia.ru website, told Izvestia this year.


Let's look at the predecessors of the PAK DA. Strategic bombers Tu-160 and Tu-95MS act primarily as carriers of cruise missiles, including those with nuclear warheads. It is known that the new X-101 has a range of over 5000 kilometers. However, such a weapon, with all its advantages, has a drawback: it is a subsonic missile that the enemy can intercept, despite the use of stealth technology in its design.

Meanwhile, the world has already entered a new hypersonic race, and it will almost certainly bear fruit. The Americans, for example, are creating several airborne hypersonic systems at once, including the heavier AGM-183A ARRW (Air-Launched Rapid Response Weapon) missile for strategic bombers and the lighter Hypersonic Air-breathing Weapon Concept (HAWC) that the F-35 can carry. ... And if in the case of ARRW the second flight tests in a row end in failure, then the Americans have recently successfully launched HAWC.


The advantages of hypersonic weapons with all the fundamental technical problems associated with their creation are obvious. The highest flight speed (greater or equal to M = 5 or 6120 kilometers per hour), as well as the ability to maneuver using aerodynamic forces, makes the interception of such a missile almost impossible in many cases. And the blow itself was unexpected and deadly. It is assumed that a long-range cruise missile with a hypersonic flight speed almost nullifies the possibility of modern air defense systems.

The PAK DA bomber will almost certainly receive hypersonic weapons. The fact that Russia is developing the latest long-range hypersonic missile became known this year.

“For these purposes, for the Aerospace Forces, new and modernized models of weapons, military and special equipment are being developed and adopted for service, such as the Tu-160M ​​strategic missile-carrying bomber; airborne hypersonic missile system "Dagger"; high-precision long-range airborne weapons, in particular the Kh-95 hypersonic missile ", - leads RIA News words of the Chief of the Military Academy of the General Staff Colonel-General Vladimir Zarudnitsky.

According to a source in the military-industrial complex, referred to in the agency, the PAK DA will be among the carriers along with the Tu-160M ​​(M2?) And the Tu-22M3M long-range bomber. According to the data presented, prototypes of the product are already being tested from the air carrier.

According to data from open sources, a hypersonic missile is designed to destroy strategic enemy targets at distances of up to 5 thousand kilometers. The flight speed is about 10 thousand kilometers per hour.

It is likely that hypersonic missiles will become something of a "day one weapon", when, as a result of a massive strike, the most important strategic targets of the enemy are to be destroyed. After neutralizing the main part of the air defense, the aircraft will be able to deliver strikes using more "familiar" methods, for example, using subsonic cruise missiles of the Kh-101 type or precision bombs.


Among the latter, speaking about the PAK DA arsenal, they name the newest planning aerial bomb "Drill", designed to destroy tanks, ground radar and air defense systems. Its main advantage is its relative cheapness combined with good accuracy. The planning range of the ammunition reaches 30 kilometers. The bomb has 15 self-aiming combat elements, which are separated at the end of the trajectory and descend by parachute, aiming at the target using radar and infrared sensors. The weight of the Drill is 540 kilograms.

Air-to-air weapons


There is one feature that distinguishes the PAK DA from all existing "strategists", and it is again associated with weapons. According to Boris Obnosov, general director of the Tactical Missile Corporation (KTRV), the plane will be able to carry air-to-air missiles.

"There will be air-to-air missiles, but most of them will be air-to-surface missiles," - quotes "Interfax" his words.


Thus, we are not talking about the transformation of the PAK DA into a conditional analogue of the promising "regional" B-21R, which was sometimes portrayed as a heavy long-range fighter. Air-to-air missiles will be used for self-defense purposes. Most likely, we are talking about several products such as RVV-SD medium-range or RVV-MD short-range. A larger number of them will invariably affect the main combat load - cruise missiles. The space inside the compartments (compartment?) Of weapons will be limited, and when placing weapons on external holders, the aircraft will lose its main trump card - stealth.

It is also known that PAK DA will receive "completely new airborne defense complex"Designed to protect the aircraft using electronic warfare. The new bomber will have to make its first flight in the middle of the decade.
58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. +10
      16 November 2021 05: 55
      Quote: Login_Off
      There is no plane yet, its characteristics are unknown.

      Things are only slightly worse than with the Su-57, the characteristics are roughly clear, but the aircraft is still missing. laughing
      1. +20
        16 November 2021 06: 58
        We can invent wunderwafli as much as we like, but for 60 years the main work of long-range aviation has been carried out by the Tu-95.
        It is necessary to descend from heaven to earth. A poor country that churns out its latest products one by one needs a cheap and economical medium. There is nothing better in this regard than the Tu-95 and is not expected. In Ukraine, which was armed with Tu-22m3 and Tu-160, these aircraft did not fly at all. Because every takeoff and landing of these planes is insanely expensive.

        Starting from the harsh reality, we need a cheap replacement for the reliable Tu-95. Something like Tu-95 powered by PD-14 engines (something in between, between MS-21 and Tu-95). And then come up with expensive wunderwales for at least another hundred years.

        Yes, we were promised triumphantly to release new Tu-160s ... where is he? I don't think it will be at all.
        1. -6
          16 November 2021 08: 54
          KAZAN, August 27, 2021. / TASS /. Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu called the resumption of production of Tu-160 strategic missile carriers by the Kazan Aviation Plant (KAZ) a common victory; he set this task to the enterprise several years ago.

          There is no doubt about the restoration of the production of TU-160.
          1. +4
            16 November 2021 09: 09
            Quote: Alexander97
            Shoigu call a common victory resumption of production of strategic missile carriers Tu-160

            At least one new building has already been laid (from the new buildings)? No? And when will they? It has been in the yard for almost 22 years and has already promised PAK YES. Two very expensive and similar projects will not be financed at once.
            1. +3
              16 November 2021 11: 19
              And it's not destiny to use the brain? The MO contract has already been concluded, production from scratch is underway.
            2. Two
              -1
              17 November 2021 13: 14
              An unfinished copy is being finalized. New ones are not being collected yet.
              1. +2
                18 November 2021 11: 00
                Quote: Dos
                An unfinished copy is being finalized. New ones are not being collected yet.


                They are assembling. And next year, the first Tu-160M2 built from scratch will make its first flight. News from August 22, 2021.
                Moscow. August 22. INTERFAX.RU - The start of flight tests of the first built "from scratch" Tu-160M ​​"White Swan" is scheduled for 2022, said the head of the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation Denis Manturov in an interview with Interfax.

                "Serial production of new Tu-160s has already been launched at the plant in Kazan. We expect that the first such aircraft will be tested next year," Manturov said.

                He recalled that the plant is also deeply modernizing combat aircraft in the form of Tu-160M.

                "These aircraft are already undergoing tests and will soon be handed over for the next stage of testing by specialists of the Ministry of Defense, including in conditions that best meet the real situation. After that, the upgraded aircraft will be transferred to combat units of Long-Range Aviation," Manturov said.

                https://www.interfax.ru/russia/785801
                1. Two
                  0
                  18 November 2021 15: 47
                  Manturov has already voiced a lot ...
          2. +2
            16 November 2021 16: 55
            There is no doubt about the restoration of the production of TU-160.

            There is no doubt, but there is no missile carrier either ...
        2. +4
          16 November 2021 11: 30
          Quote: Stas157
          Starting from the harsh reality ...

          and a huge territory,
          Quote: Stas157
          we need a cheap replacement for the reliable Tu-95. Something like Tu-95 powered by PD-14 engines (something in between, between MS-21 and Tu-95) ..

          For dozens of such boards will be needed in order to be in time everywhere ... And ten of them won't make the difference, but they will cost ...
        3. +6
          16 November 2021 12: 44
          The use of PAK YES for bombardment of tank columns, I hope this is just a figment of the author's sick imagination ... Another article voicing pink dreams.
      2. -2
        16 November 2021 22: 47
        But several dozen super duper yachts were built by the Russian wealthy. already hunting from such news.
  2. -1
    16 November 2021 06: 14
    there is no aircraft, its characteristics are unknown.

    Fortune-telling again. Fantasy and speculation.

    It seems to me that this PAKDA will fly earlier than the "old-new" Tu160m2, the meaning of the production of which is becoming more and more incomprehensible.
    1. +12
      16 November 2021 07: 22
      Unfortunately, the tragedy with the Il - 112 showed that our calculated characteristics are far from real and the deadlines for delivery, too.
      Well, but with pictures to change and extol your own, and foreign to find fault ... Yes, no one forbids ...
      1. +4
        16 November 2021 10: 25
        We must add civilian MS-21 and the failed Superjet.
        1. +3
          16 November 2021 14: 49
          Where exactly did the SSJ-100 fail? More than 200 aircraft have been produced and production continues.
          1. -2
            17 November 2021 14: 17
            The aircraft is clearly crude and unfinished, as evidenced by the incidents that occurred with it. Plus, very frequent rejection of its use by customers and operators.
          2. 0
            19 January 2022 20: 49
            How many are flying? How many operator? What is the flight per day on board?
            And after all, this is essentially the simplest car, which is riveted not only by Boeing and Airbuses, but by some hundreds of Brazilians.
      2. -4
        16 November 2021 11: 25
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        the tragedy with the Il - 112 showed that our calculated characteristics are far from real and the deadlines for delivery, as well.

        Enough to grind nonsense, she did not show anything. Tragedies during trials have always happened for a variety of reasons.
        1. 0
          17 November 2021 14: 19
          What are the tests? They dragged him to the exhibition. Plus, read about the accident itself. Its reasons and development. More than intelligible.
  3. +11
    16 November 2021 06: 22
    Apparently there is absolutely nothing to write about, again fortune-telling on the coffee grounds. In the near future, we should expect an article about the helicopter carriers under construction and what they will be. And also the Su 75, how could it be without it. The fortune-tellers got tired of it ...
  4. 0
    16 November 2021 06: 24
    It's a shame that having such a groundwork, we do not know how to use it. We are stumbling in place. The Chinese flew for many years on the ancient Tu-16 and its modifications, but in the end, without having a school, they managed to create our own analogue of the B-2. promise and lag behind ...
    1. -1
      16 November 2021 16: 52
      "managed to create!" .. too loudly said in the absence of a bomber as such
  5. +5
    16 November 2021 06: 29
    Putin will still have time to reset to zero a couple of times until this "miracle" appears in the flight units ...
    1. 0
      16 November 2021 07: 51
      Quote: sustav75
      Putin will still have time to reset to zero a couple of times until this "miracle" appears in the flight units ...

      Yes, really ... You should also know where that Baba Yaga lives:
  6. +13
    16 November 2021 06: 41
    What kind of drill ...?! wassat raise the strategist to launch the drill at the tank ... which has a range of 30 km .. belay
    1. +5
      16 November 2021 13: 26
      Quote: Popuas
      What kind of drill ...?! wassat raise the strategist to launch the drill at the tank ... which has a range of 30 km .. belay

      That's why they soldered me a minus) Apparently it got from the author)
  7. +2
    16 November 2021 06: 46
    It is probably worth mentioning laser and microwave defensive weapons. for years ch.z. 5 any promising complex without them becomes hopeless. On the Tu-160M2, they must also be present (or at least a place has been prepared for them.)
    But "Drill" on PAKDA, ... - certainly possible, but probably very specific, as well as freely falling "cast iron". Not in terms of status is already on finishing.
    I also think about ROFAR, the complex is expensive, promising, so everything should be promising there (at least I see it that way)
  8. -5
    16 November 2021 07: 29
    Mr. Barberry25! November 11 of this year, we argued with you about the boiling point of water on the benefits of hypersound:

    I was pleased to read:
    The advantages of hypersonic weapons with all the fundamental technical problems associated with their creation are obvious. The highest flight speed (greater or equal to M = 5 or 6120 kilometers per hour), as well as the ability to maneuver using aerodynamic forces makes it virtually impossible to intercept such a missile in many cases. And the blow itself was unexpected and deadly.

    So, water boils at 100 ° C, and 90 ° is a right angle.
    hi
    1. +12
      16 November 2021 07: 57
      makes it virtually impossible to intercept such a missile in many cases.

      This is the opinion of a private author, without evidence it does not carry any value. Moreover, it is deeply mistaken in such a setting.
      Quote: ROSS 42
      So, water boils at 100 ° C, and 90 °

      Water boils when heated to 90 ° C, if the atmospheric pressure is ~ 70 kPa. Such conditions are possible at an altitude of ~ 3000 meters above sea level.
      1. 0
        16 November 2021 08: 03
        Quote: OgnennyiKotik
        Water boils when heated to 90 ° C, if the atmospheric pressure is ~ 70 kPa. Such conditions are possible at an altitude of ~ 3000 meters above sea level.

        I studied physics in the late sixties, and in the mid-sixties I read about similar things in educational literature ... Deep for you - "merci".
        Just a phrase:
        Quote: ROSS 42
        water boils at 100 ° C, and 90 ° is a right angle.

        from the joke about the ensign:
    2. -1
      16 November 2021 16: 55
      hi I will say that before, we have various hypersounds, but an inexpensive cruise missile with a range of 2,5 thousand km, which can be massively hung on heavy fighters, no, which is sad
  9. +10
    16 November 2021 08: 46
    There is one feature that distinguishes PAK DA from all existing "strategists"

    The main feature that distinguishes PAK DA from all existing "strategists" is that they exist and fly in reality, and PAK DA exists and flies in the alternative reality of the writings of agitators and propagandists.
    1. -7
      16 November 2021 09: 18
      The same can be said about the B-21, but this does not prevent it from being promoted abroad.
  10. -2
    16 November 2021 09: 07
    ))) good luck to our air shipbuilders))) and their aeronautics))
  11. 0
    16 November 2021 09: 21
    Weapons are almost all there .... 90% of his missions are CD with different warheads. If PAK DA will be a single bomber, the main question is whether PAK Da will be able to use both CD and anti-ship missiles (of different types) and corr bombs. How easy it will be to change or combine configurations ..... Now there is an era of local conflicts and it is stupid to adopt a highly specialized Bomber only for the CD or only for the anti-ship missile.
  12. +4
    16 November 2021 09: 40
    Only model airplanes remained in our aviation industry. They will put together a model of a fighter, now they have taken up a model of a bomber
  13. +6
    16 November 2021 10: 05
    Alas, alas.
    IMHO, we are also starting to lose the war of cartoons.

    Not a single sensible cartoon about PAK YES lately.

    And the Americans and the Chinese are trying ...
    1. 0
      16 November 2021 10: 49
      so the secretaries are working actively ...
  14. PPD
    +1
    16 November 2021 10: 51
    Great, of course.
    But - what prevents new missiles from being hung on the same TU 95? All one and he and the novelty are subsonic. And that 160 is generally supersonic. Moreover, it is impossible to find that 95 from space on the trail. And how is the new plane with this? Yes, and it is strange as a merit of an airplane to supply new missiles. Which, too, do not exist yet, and it is not clear how it will all fly in reality.
    1. 0
      16 November 2021 22: 29
      Tu95 and Tu22 are finite, they are not produced and their composition will naturally decrease ...
  15. +3
    16 November 2021 11: 35
    Fortune telling on the coffee grounds (the child has not yet been born, let alone grown up, but he is already credited with character), one thing is clear, the pricey one will be incredible and there will be from one to three.
  16. +3
    16 November 2021 12: 53
    Armed, dangerous and drawn
  17. +7
    16 November 2021 14: 07
    It will definitely not fly in 2023. A weapon for him is only in the thoughts of the designers. This is a distant prospect. Look, we can't make the IL-112 / IL-114, the A-100 is expected by 2024 ... 1 piece, experimental. Don't fool people.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  18. 0
    16 November 2021 15: 06
    So far, all this reminds of an old anecdote when one woman from Odessa tried to woo her old maid friend to a potential groom. The "girl" is already over 50, and still won't get married.
    - You know what her taste is! You know what kind of carpet she wanted to buy last year! ..

    God grant that it flew on time. It would be interesting to look at this "boomeragn" in flight ...
  19. +2
    16 November 2021 16: 09
    A very aggressive video about the Su-75 came out, where he was against the bayraktar, and at the end he was also against the king (F-35). The main thing is not to do it this time and do everything as promised. Otherwise, no one else will believe us. Rostec and Sukhoi made too loud a statement. I hope they will do everything on time.
    1. -1
      16 November 2021 17: 08
      taking into account that ordinary aviation contracts for 3-5 years are being discussed, I see no problems
    2. +1
      16 November 2021 22: 46
      Quote: far diu
      and at the end and against the king (F-35).

      Against the "naked king". Yes wassat
  20. +2
    16 November 2021 22: 50
    Calm down all of you. Everything will be fine. It's just that technology and technology do not stand still in our time. And what was considered unthinkable yesterday is possible today. Yesterday, for example, drones were considered toys; today it is already a real force. So in bomber aviation and others - what was previously considered promising today is no longer relevant or more advanced solutions of technology, materials, etc. appear. Therefore, sometimes it is not worth rushing. Let's say you want to build a house, you have a certain amount of money - try to pick up a project right away. No, at first you will walk, see who has what, doubt, hesitate, what is there and how it was built, what kind of perspective the house may have over time. So is the bomber - the development of the concept of use, the choice of shape (aerodynamics and the shape of the structure for stealth), additional means of protection for invisibility (coatings, materials), internal filling for different cases. Now imagine that there are many options and designs for all this. So you need to test before deciding what to implement, choose the final version, because the board will be in service for many years, estimate its modernization possibilities when changing the concept, coordinate the operation of mechanisms, equipment, and so on, and a lot of things are needed. Then testing and fine-tuning. Perhaps PAK-DA is being developed by more than one company and there will be a competition. Moreover, this product will be protected from prying eyes and the press will temporarily hang out "misinformation", right up to the display of aircraft models that have nothing in reality. So calm down and believe. All will be.
    To fly on this, but the age is out, soon you will have to look at everything from the sky. But such is life, they lived before us and will live after us.
    1. -1
      18 November 2021 06: 32
      There is no more faith in these talkers and managers! And it won't. They have different goals. Business. They sneezed at the country's defense! Enrichment is the meaning of their life. The designers and pilots of the Soviet Union who have gone to another world are spinning in their graves from all this Putin's capitalism! Faith and hope are certainly good, but there is the truth of life and it is terrible ...
  21. 0
    17 November 2021 00: 04
    Of course, the West desperately wants the Tu-PAK-DA to be subsonic. And of course, for many "experts" Russia does not need anything of a higher technological level than Western developments. It always happens that way.

    But then we have the Su-S-70 Okhotnik, which is the same concept on a scaled down scale for tactical use, and some reports say it is supersonic.

    I would not be surprised if Tu-PAK-DA was supersonic. I do not expect that Russia will drop one step in comparison with the Tu-160 and Tu-22. Otherwise, contracts for new production can go to these aircraft, and production of the Tu-22 can be resumed.

    And I would not be surprised if the Tu-PAK-DA was developed taking into account the needs of the Russian naval aviation in the corresponding naval combat roles, including in anti-submarine warfare.

    Tu-PAK-DA and the Altair / Altius unmanned aerial vehicle are the two main strategic air-based platforms in the future of the Russian Armed Forces, with Altair / Altius most likely to take over most of the maritime patrolling, reconnaissance, surveillance, early warning and some light combat functions.

    (Automatic translation from English)

    Of course, the West desperately wants the Tu-PAK-DA to be subsonic. And of course, for many "experts" Russia does not need anything of higher technological level than the Western developments. It always happens.

    But then, we have the Su-S-70 Okhotnik, that is the same concept at a reduced scale for tactical use, and some reports say it is supersonic.

    I would not be surprised if the Tu-PAK-DA is supersonic. I do not expect Russia to go one step down from the Tu-160 and the Tu-22. Otherwise the contracts for new production can go to these aircraft, and the production of the Tu-22 can be resumed.

    And I would not be surprised if the Tu-PAK-DA is designed taking into account the needs of the Russian Naval Aviation in the referred to naval combat roles, including Anti-Submarine Warfare.

    The Tu-PAK-DA and the Altayr / Altius UAV / UCAV, are the two main air based strategic platforms in the future of the Russian Armed Forces, with the Altayr / Altius very likely assuming most of the maritime patrol, reconnaissance, surveillance, early warning and some light combat roles.
    1. 0
      17 November 2021 01: 27
      It's not that subsonic. It is simply subsonic in certain forms and with appropriate heating and radio-absorbing surfaces and measures, it is easier to hide from detection means. And the smaller the RCS of the side and the infrared illumination, the later you will be detected and you can get a little closer to the target or using stealth and given the data on the detection range of the hosted radar stations, it is generally not noticeable to bypass these areas to break through to the target.
      There will be a naval version, even it will probably appear earlier or at the same time. Many problems on land can be solved with missile weapons, but for the destruction of ships on a campaign, boats and coastal infrastructure is the best.
  22. 0
    17 November 2021 09: 35
    Why are you all rushing ahead of the locomotive? Wangyue? They will do where to go. The situation is compelling.
    Everything will be fine and we will see this handsome man again.
  23. 0
    17 November 2021 14: 48
    It is likely that hypersonic missiles will become something of a "day one weapon", when, as a result of a massive strike, the most important strategic targets of the enemy are to be destroyed.


    But this is already a serious statement.
    Okay, I agree with the commentators. The article is sham, in terms of the fact that discussing something that does not yet exist is such a thing for yourself. But I was thinking about something else. Something like that, recently, there is not a good trend.
    If you look at the weapons of the Soviet Union, there is a clear defensive doctrine. The giant nuclear-powered missile cruisers, Orlans, are equipped with a set of weighty cruise missiles to destroy aircraft carrier formations and protect themselves from submarines. Luxurious submarine cruisers Antei carry kits for annihilation of all the same aircraft carrier formations and other aggressive naval epidemics of the NATO bloc. All equipment, practically of all types and projects, is aimed at suppressing the enemy's strike capabilities. The main direction is the destruction of the surface and underwater components of potential friends, in the event of their sudden loss of consciousness. A small exception are a number of projects, such as 667AT (several units), some RTMok and Shchuk. They have offensive strike weapons - long-range cruise missiles.
    And now, any pelvis, any ship of the second rank is crammed to the very waterways with Calibers in the performance of KRBD. It is clear that the unification allows you to take out the KRBD and stick in the anti-ship missiles. But this does not negate the fact that all of these are potentially offensive weapons. The apotheosis of all this action, shooting from diesel submarines in Syria. Well, still, in the RTOs of project 1234, the strategic calibers were pushed and fired. MoGeom!

    Why am I, we're in approach gathered?
  24. 0
    17 November 2021 22: 35
    approximately 145 tons and a payload in the region of 20-30 tons.


    If so - cool, cho.
    Is it this "hang gliding" that gives grounds to assume such masses?
    It's just that if so, it is possible to make a UAV in this scheme.
  25. -1
    18 November 2021 10: 51
    Equipping stealth bombers with hypersonic missiles is unwise. During launch, the missile's infrared signature unmasks the PAK YES. Equipping the Tu-160 with hypersound is another matter. The PAK DA needs subsonic cruise missiles with reduced radar signature. In fact, the X-101 will do too ...
  26. 0
    19 January 2022 20: 44
    I love discussing the characteristics of blasters and other races of death that are not and will not be for the next 20 years.
  27. 0
    3 February 2022 21: 28
    You can forget about the PAK DA after the resuscitation of the Tu-160 developed in the 70s. We have been flying for 60 years in 2022 on the Tu-95 of the early 50s of development, now we will fly for 60 years on the Tu-160, of which 40 have already flown. Along the way, my grandchildren in 50 years will contemplate Soviet technology on guard of our homeland (