Analytical program "However" with Mikhail Leontiev 14 September 2012
The revolution devours not only their children, but also their parents and sponsors. This time this banal idea is vividly demonstrated by the great Islamic democratic revolution, carried out under the banner of Bushism-Obamism. Actually, this is the banner today and burn ungrateful fighters for freedom and democracy.
The reason for the massive attacks on American diplomatic missions in Muslim countries was the spread of the provocative American film Innocence of Muslims, in which Muslims saw the insult of the Prophet Muhammad. The greatest mass and aggressiveness of the shares differed just in the countries of the victorious "Arab spring". Where in Benghazi, the cradle of Libyan democracy, the American ambassador was killed for the first time in the last 33 of the year.
There is an opinion that this film is a product of Republican electoral technologies. The goal is to provoke a visual demonstration of the failure of Obama's policy. That alone says a lot about modern democracy. And not some kind of Arabic, Georgian, and model - American. In this case, the failure is just obvious. Moreover, Obama's failure does not cancel the previous failure of Bush, which Obama pointed out to his opponent Romney.
“He wants to bring us back to an era of drastic actions and blunders that cost America so dearly,” said Barack Obama.
There is no reason to believe that Obama’s soft actions in Egypt, Libya, Syria, and so on will cost America much less. In fact, this is the same policy in two pokes, as if in a “different manner”. Overjoyed Arabs, by the way, see no particular difference between them.
Jaseb al-Mousawi, a professor at the University of Baghdad, said: "The United States declared itself the main state in the world after the collapse of the Soviet Union. At its discretion, they now change the political map of the region. All processes in the Arab world are nothing but Greater Middle East, in accordance with the intentions of American neoconservatives. The implementation of these plans requires some kind of ideological substantiation. about the name of democracy. "
From the movie "The Man from Capuchin Boulevard":
- He did not like cinema.
Indeed, after the fall of the Union, the United States, briefly jostling along ideological back streets, led the "world revolutionary process", seizing the banner that had fallen from the weakened hands of the Soviet partocracy. By the way, our President hinted at some of the costs of manipulating the revolutionary masses from the height of our historical experience.
“We are always worried that, by supporting these armed groups, we can lead the situation to an absolute dead end. We don’t know the ultimate goals of these freedom fighters. We are afraid that the region may become chaos, which, in fact, "- said Vladimir Putin.
Islamists in Egypt and Tunisia. The collapse of Iraq and Libya. Deadlock in Afghanistan and the catastrophic Lebanization of Syria. In a historically short period of leadership of the world revolutionary process, the Americans achieved even more deplorable results than their Soviet predecessors. If it goes on like this, there is a chance to share their bad fate.
Information