The Black Sea Fleet announced the start of sea trials of the first "Karakurt", built in Kerch

68

RTO "Cyclone" after launching July 2020

The small missile ship Cyclone of Project 22800 Karakurt, built at the Zaliv shipyard in Kerch, is preparing for the first independent launch to the sea. The ship begins factory sea trials. The beginning of the ZHI was announced by the press service of the Chernomorsky fleet.

According to the report, the first exit of the "Cyclone" to the sea at the ZKhI is scheduled for November 14. How long it will last is not reported, the press service only specified that within this stage the operation of the main power plant and other systems and mechanisms will be checked, and weapons complexes will be prepared for testing.



MRK "Cyclone" is the first "Karakurt" fully built at the "Zaliv" shipyard in Kerch. It was laid down in 2016, launched in July last year, and then completed afloat. At present, the company is completing the construction of two more RTOs of this project - "Askold" and "Amur". All three "Karakurt" are intended for the Black Sea Fleet.

Now "Cyclone" is at the naval base in Novorossiysk, where it is being prepared for testing. According to the plans of the Black Sea Fleet command, the MRK will become part of the 41st Guards Brigade of the Black Sea Fleet missile ships by the end of this year.

RTOs of this project have a length of 67 meters, a width of 11 meters and a draft of 4 meters. Displacement - about 800 tons, cruising range - up to 2500 miles, autonomy - 15 days. The main armament is one UKKSK (universal ship complex) 3X14 missile launcher on the 8 KR Caliber, one 76-mm AK-176MA gun mount, ZRAK Panzir-M, two 14.5-mm or 12,7-mm machine-gun mounts MTTPU.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    68 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +1
      9 November 2021 09: 53
      Not sour "parahodik" turns out ...
      1. +1
        9 November 2021 10: 07
        And the neighbors have a holiday too! The other day, the brothers from the United States gave them two more rusty tubs of the Island Coast Guard! Already, come on, overseas tremors are twisting for sale! laughing
        1. -1
          9 November 2021 10: 13
          The question is whether they are being transported on a steamer or are they on their own, if on their own, then the toilet bowls will still come in handy.
          1. +3
            9 November 2021 11: 07
            The question is whether they are being transported on a steamer or are they under their own power

            They are taking them on a steamer, yesterday I saw a photo on a Ukrainian resource.
            1. -2
              9 November 2021 11: 25
              Then let them remove the toilets, they won't come in handy.
            2. -2
              9 November 2021 18: 01
              Strangely, marine traffic gives the location of an American at the moment near China. Maybe the Ukrainians slipped you an advertising photo in 2019. It was. Such a miracle under the American flag is precisely positioned by AIS.
          2. 0
            9 November 2021 17: 51
            Transport ship "Ocean Freedom" ..... Under their own power they will sink 50 miles from the coast .....
        2. +6
          9 November 2021 14: 00
          I don't specifically go into the topics about Ukraine, I'm tired of the same thing from the same read ... as they say, don't like it, don't read it! - I do not go
          But no, they are already dragging them into all topics in a row, as if from a trash can ... well, talk there about Ukraine, comrades, among the ukrinophiles, it's already sickening to read the same thing ... or come up with some interesting new comment ...
          1. -3
            9 November 2021 14: 44
            Show us an example! hi And do not cry for your Ukraine, since they write about it, then we read it, and when I read about i.diocy there it is a sin not to comment on it! Even if it is i.diotically! Which, however, is related to a friend! What a country, such comments! laughing
            1. +3
              9 November 2021 17: 52
              Eugene, question 1 - where do I pay for "my" Ukraine? poke your finger or you did not realize the meaning of what I wrote? 2 - who was the first to write about Ukraine in this thread besides you? where is it written about her in the article? Do you understand? You yourself wrote about Ukraine in the topic where it was not there at all, and you yourself began to comment on it .. it was you! go to your Ukrainian topics and oppose there with like-minded people about Urainu-she already zadolbala, I want to read about our army and discuss interesting and clever comments, and not about "what is there at hoh..ov" you know? I do not mind at all - those about Ukraine - write about Ukraine wherever about it - with this recently on the resource 0 problems - every 3rd about her .. but that you are with her as with a bag in almost any topic on the resource stuck .. she seems to be much more yours than mine ... hi no offense but already sick of this "ukrainstva"
              1. 0
                9 November 2021 18: 36
                Nauseous, why do you fit in? Come on by! hi
      2. +1
        9 November 2021 10: 10
        Quote: seld
        Not sour "parahodik" turns out ...

        sort of like the first serially installed "Pantsir-M"
        if I am not mistaken
        1. +7
          9 November 2021 10: 59
          Quote: Flood
          sort of like the first serially installed "Pantsir-M"

          No, the first Pantsir-M was delivered to Odintsovo (former Shkval) - launching in May 2018 (Pella plant), in service since November 2020.
          1. +2
            9 November 2021 11: 03
            Quote: Alexey RA
            the first "Pantsir-M" was put on "Odintsovo"

            You're right. Thanks for the amendment.
    2. +11
      9 November 2021 09: 56
      MRK "Cyclone" is the first "Karakurt" fully built at the "Zaliv" shipyard in Kerch.
      Happy Firstborn, "Zaliv"! Many ships for your construction!
    3. -7
      9 November 2021 09: 56
      Karakurt needs to be finalized to the PLO corvert. And Calibri? Only Caliber-NK.
      1. KCA
        +5
        9 November 2021 10: 15
        3S14 is not only valuable fur, oh, "Calibers", but also "Onyx" or "Zircon", PU is unified for all three missiles, and how many types of these missiles will be typed, certainly not less than a dozen, they will fit in iron, and modify electronics not a problem
        1. -10
          9 November 2021 10: 18
          There is nothing to do from a corvette nedofregat. Lamb 3C14 is in a poriadok.
          But who and how will do the control center for the Onyx and Zirkons of the AWACS naval aviation number?
          It should be a bit cheap and masovy.
          Corvette in the 1st turn is a means of anti-aircraft defense and anti-aircraft defense.
          1. KCA
            -2
            9 November 2021 10: 25
            So there are other tasks, small and relatively cheap RTOs can be done a lot, scatter them together with the submarine across the Black Sea and launch 8 "Zircons" from each, I don't know what will remain of the enemy squadron, except for life rafts, besides these RTOs of the river-sea class, with a slight movement of the hand, are transferred from the Black to the Baltic, White Sea, to the Caspian, or you can generally place near Moscow
            1. -6
              9 November 2021 10: 39
              Opiate put in a question.
              Who and how will do for these RTOs with Zirconia CU?
              And I ask you not to write to me about Liana.
              1. KCA
                0
                9 November 2021 12: 50
                Who can tell me about satellite target designation? How do I know that they have launched and are still planning to launch videoconferencing and military equipment? Yes, and there have never been purely civilian satellites, they all perform tasks in the interests of defense and intelligence, suppose that if Russia was able to solve the passage of radio waves through a fiery cocoon of missiles and BB at hypersonic speed, perhaps there are some successes in creating the GOS, perhaps ROFAR is at the stage of implementation, and the rocket has enough data from the long-range radar to independently reach the target, especially if two radars spaced by hundreds or thousands of kilometers will give out the coordinates of the target, then the guidance accuracy will increase
      2. 0
        9 November 2021 10: 33
        Quote: CastroRuiz
        Karakurt needs to be finalized to the PLO corvert. And Calibri? Only Caliber-NK.

        ========
        Displacement is not enough!
        1. -6
          9 November 2021 10: 34
          Why ? SJSC tugs.
          1. -1
            9 November 2021 10: 53
            Probably more accuracy and range. The second ship will be wet, according to American technology from the Second World War.
          2. +2
            9 November 2021 11: 02
            Quote: CastroRuiz
            Why ? SJSC tugs.

            =======
            To haul a towed SJC you need to have a fair amount of power, which is not available on the "Karakurt"! And the lowered GUS needs to be shoved somewhere, but WHERE? There, and so the layout is denser - nowhere! hi
            1. -3
              9 November 2021 11: 06
              There is a problem with the power of engines, yes.
              1. -1
                9 November 2021 15: 45
                Quote: CastroRuiz
                There is a problem with the power of engines, yes.
                What about Russian grammar? Keyboard of the wrong caliber?
    4. +5
      9 November 2021 09: 58
      Yes, on the Gulf in Kerch, shipbuilding is restored and restored, the same story is at Butom. But the people are trying, so many years without work.
      1. +5
        9 November 2021 10: 04

        tralflot1832 (Andrey S.)
        Today, 09: 58
        +1
        Yes, on the Gulf in Kerch, shipbuilding is restored and restored, the same story is at Butoma. But the people try, so many years without work.
        And this is very good! There will be decent wages, and there will be a result. Simple arithmetic.
        1. -1
          9 November 2021 10: 16
          On Butoma, on the site there are vacancies (immediately with a salary), they are the only ones, the upper bar is very worthy, I think so.
          1. 0
            9 November 2021 10: 44

            tralflot1832 (Andrey S.)
            Today, 10: 16
            NEW

            +1
            On Butoma, on the site there are vacancies (immediately with a salary), they are the only ones, the upper bar is very worthy, I think so.
            Give it, God!
      2. +3
        9 November 2021 10: 25
        Quote: tralflot1832
        Yes, on the Gulf in Kerch, shipbuilding is restored and restored, the same story is at Butom. But the people are trying, so many years without work.

        This is how shipbuilding in Ukraine was destroyed for more than twenty-five years. And in the Crimea as well. It will be easier to build a steamer in Crimea than in Murmansk or St. Petersburg .. The climate, whatever one may say, will be more pleasant for working with metal with bare hands in winter. And the electricity consumption for lighting is less. .. Still, in Sevastopol, the ship repair was restored! People need normal work, and not sell tomatoes and pasties.
        1. -1
          9 November 2021 10: 49
          I agree completely, Murmansk will have enough and the super duper shipbuilding of Novatek will be enough. And the military shipbuilding of ships of the first rank was developed in our south. TARK like Orlan is Peter. Let them train, bones will grow.
        2. +1
          9 November 2021 15: 50
          Quote: 30 vis
          Still, in Sevastopol, the ship repair was restored! People need normal work, and not sell tomatoes and pasties.
          Over the years of independence, they are used to selling only rented housing. And it's very good that everything is gradually being restored.
          1. -1
            9 November 2021 17: 04
            Quote: Vladimir61
            Over the years of independence, they are used to selling only rented housing.

            This is a small part of the people. And not their fault. that instead of working in their specialty, they had to rent out their dachas and their housing. Simply because people of working and engineering specialties are no longer needed ..
      3. -2
        9 November 2021 11: 24
        Quote: tralflot1832
        Yes, on the Gulf in Kerch, shipbuilding is restored and restored, the same story is at Butoma.

        In fact, the Zaliv plant and the plant named after Butomas are the same.
        Full name: plant "Zaliv" named after Butoma
        1. +2
          9 November 2021 18: 07
          And who is minus you, your own. From me, plus, for the amendment. I had to look, but there is such a mess. Why not privatized by the state. The Gunpowder Plant was privatized, and why not Butoma USC.
    5. -11
      9 November 2021 10: 36
      Why are we kidding ourselves?
      Why are we building this parody of a normal ship?
      For a report to the Supreme?
      1. +3
        9 November 2021 10: 50
        Quote: Bez 310
        Why are we building this parody of a normal ship?

        What's wrong with this ship? Small rocket ship of the 3rd rank. It is quite good in its class, equipped with missiles of the "Caliber" family. Or do you only take ships of the 1st rank seriously? Different ranks are needed, different ranks are important ...
        1. -1
          9 November 2021 11: 02
          Quote: 76SSSR
          What's wrong with this ship?

          The fact that after the actual withdrawal from the INF Treaty, it is not needed. Now it is possible to build normal launchers of GLCMs on a wheeled chassis.
          And instead of RTOs, it would be better to build MPK and TSC.
          1. +2
            9 November 2021 11: 25
            Quote: Alexey RA
            And instead of RTOs, it would be better to build MPK and TSC.

            IPC and minesweepers, of course, are needed, I do not argue. The statement that it is necessary to build not these, but other ships does not make this ship bad. I wrote in response to a comment regarding this particular ship - MRK. The ship was called "a parody of a normal ship", the person did not write, they say, why are we building ships of this type, it is necessary to build others, for example, the MPK, and not the MRK, he simply designated the "Karakurt" as "undership". Therefore, I wrote that he was "pretty good in his class."
            1. +1
              9 November 2021 13: 21
              Quote: 76SSSR
              The ship was called "a parody of a normal ship", the person did not write, they say, why are we building ships of this type, it is necessary to build others, for example, IPC, and not MRK,

              The decision to build a large series of RTOs was made at a time when it became clear that we would not be able to build normal ships for a LONG time. So this is a necessary measure.
              But even with these ships, the "Propulsion Curse" dominates the domestic shipbuilding industry ...
              It would be most reasonable to build slightly larger ships that combine the functions of MRK and IPC. This would be possible if we had a power plant for the ship VI 1300 - 1500 tons, capable of accelerating it to 30 knots ... There is no such power plant.
              It could be a propulsion system based on diesel engines of 10 hp promised by Kolomna. Two of them would be enough.
              But they are not.
              On the MPK VI, up to 1500 tons should be, in addition to the UKSK for PLUR and other KR (depending on the task at hand), also BUGAS, submersible GAS and "Packet-NK". It is impossible to place all this in a smaller VI.
          2. +3
            9 November 2021 11: 30
            Quote: Alexey RA
            Now it is possible to build a normal launcher on a wheeled chassis.

            this does not interfere with the construction of RTOs, but complements) hi drinks
      2. -15
        9 November 2021 10: 54
        Quote: Bez 310
        Why are we kidding ourselves?
        Why are we building this parody of a normal ship?
        For a report to the Supreme?

        right now you will get rid of "confused" .... wassat
        1. +1
          9 November 2021 11: 31
          Quote: Dead Day
          right now you will get rid of "confused" ..

          well, or from the nasal
      3. +1
        9 November 2021 11: 24
        Quote: Bez 310
        Why are we building this parody of a normal ship?

        Where do you call it a parody of RTOs ????, there are shock functions, there is air defense, there is no PLO, but this is an RTO! give an example from the USSR is not a parody!
        1. -6
          9 November 2021 11: 31
          Quote: Tiksi-3
          Where do you call this a parody of RTOs ????,

          So I would like to know that ...
          Indeed, in what?
          Point with your finger.
          1. -1
            9 November 2021 11: 32
            Quote: Bez 310
            Point with your finger.

            and it is customary for you to answer a question with a question?
            1. -7
              9 November 2021 11: 33
              Quote: Tiksi-3
              and it is customary for you to answer a question with a question?

              It is customary for us to read, understand, and then ask questions.
              1. 0
                9 November 2021 11: 35
                Quote: Bez 310
                It is customary for us to read, understand, and then ask questions.

                I used to have a better opinion of you, but I told you that he was both shock and air defense. for RTOs this is quite enough
                you will bring an example from the USSR to a normal ship, otherwise you blurted out A - now you need to say B
                1. -5
                  9 November 2021 11: 37
                  Quote: Tiksi-3
                  I used to think better of you

                  You are quick to kill ...
                  And how am I going to live with it now?
                  Sorry, but still, I would advise you to re-read my comment and your reaction to it.
                  1. +1
                    9 November 2021 11: 52
                    Quote: Bez 310
                    Why are we kidding ourselves?
                    Why are we building this parody of a normal ship?
                    For a report to the Supreme?

                    This is an RTO !!!!
                    you never brought an example of a normal ship, so you are trolling, it is clear
                    1. -6
                      9 November 2021 12: 03
                      Quote: Tiksi-3
                      then troll, it's clear

                      Excuse me...
                      Since everything is clear to you, I will end the dialogue.
                      1. 0
                        9 November 2021 12: 40
                        Quote: Bez 310
                        Since everything is clear to you, I have finished the dialogue

                        so you didn’t start it, you just spat in the chat and began to be silent and cheat ... ados, pilot
        2. +2
          9 November 2021 11: 59
          Quote: Tiksi-3
          Where do you call it a parody of RTOs ????

          This is not a parody of RTOs, but of a normal ship.
          RTOs by their nature, not having a full-fledged air defense (only self-defense, and in a limited sector), can only work under the umbrella of the coastal IA. Otherwise it will be like in Libya - defeat after the first start of the radar. There is no particular hope for the air defense system - radio horizon.
          Does the fleet have AI in normal quantities? Is there over-the-horizon detection and control center for anti-ship missiles?
          Quote: Tiksi-3
          give an example from the USSR is not a parody!

          The USSR had a completely different fleet. In which divisions and brigades of missile ships stood "behind the backs" of numerous ships of 1 and 2 ranks.
          1. +3
            9 November 2021 12: 42
            Quote: Alexey RA
            This is not a parody of RTOs, but of a normal ship.

            a parody in our state! that we can build it, okay, at least we build it, against the Sumeria, Georgia is just right, but the Augs can only be driven by cheers for patriots, and the couch
      4. +2
        9 November 2021 14: 28
        Can you explain?
        Yours faithfully,
        Edward
        1. +1
          9 November 2021 16: 30
          Quote: Eduard Vaschenko
          Can you explain?

          judging by his other comments - he can't, he doesn't know
          but in fact, in the case of the start of a DB on the Black Sea, these ships will be under the roof of our aviation and the S-400, for example, I am sure that the air in the theater of the World Cup will be behind us, then these RTOs will be able to strike in depth at stationary strategic objects, but the fleet of a non-friendly country will not even try to pass the straits, since this is suicide today.
          1. 0
            9 November 2021 18: 12
            Thanks for the reply.
            I asked a question, because, in Soviet times, I personally knew the chief engineer of the Gulf, then it was a discovery for me that patrol boats are being built on the Gulf, according to the modern classification, frigates. True, I was little then. And the question was about this: the ship that entered service, is it a continuation of a series of border guards? But is it half the size of the "series" of the Gulf patrol boats?

            Yours faithfully,
            hi
            1. -1
              9 November 2021 18: 40
              Quote: Eduard Vaschenko
              that on the Gulf patrols are being built, according to modern classification, frigates.

              What frigates? Pskr 1135, like Sagaidachny? These are frigates only for Ukraine, for us they are only a border guard and nothing more. The size in this case is only a minus.
              1. +1
                9 November 2021 18: 47
                Do you have anything to do with the Navy?
                1. 0
                  9 November 2021 18: 58
                  Quote: Edward Vashchenko
                  Do you have anything to do with the Navy?

                  25 years in the fleet of Her Majesty Russia
                  1. 0
                    9 November 2021 19: 38
                    good good
                    Thank you!
                2. 0
                  9 November 2021 19: 02
                  Perhaps you are writing about the naval 1135, but this is also not a frigate, this is a pure anti-submarine ship with weak air defense
              2. +1
                9 November 2021 19: 54
                Quote: Marconi41
                What frigates? Pskr 1135, like Sagaidachny? These are frigates only for Ukraine, for us it is only a border guard

                You are not right. The Zaliv plant has built since 1969 7 ships of the 1135 Burevestnik project and 8 ships of the 11351 Nerei project
                1. 0
                  9 November 2021 22: 54
                  Quote: Overlock
                  You are not right. The Zaliv plant has built since 1969 7 ships of the 1135 Burevestnik project and 8 ships of the 11351 Nerei project

                  I know this very well, but I'm sorry I can't call the anti-submarine skr a frigate either. Shock weapons only Blizzard, air defense two Wasps and a pair of gun mounts. Even the notorious Bayraktar will be able to target such a "frigate". The ship of the last century.
                  1. +1
                    9 November 2021 23: 25
                    And in general, I do not like Western cassifications. All these frigates, corvettes are not ours.
    6. -1
      10 November 2021 20: 08
      That's the title of the article ... The beginning of the running trials of the spider in Kerch ... What kind of karakurt, where, where, why? .. It doesn't matter. laughing

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"