British press: Putin sends Biden warning of rising military power in the Black Sea

37

Russia conducted a series of military exercises against the background of two US warships entering the Black Sea, thereby demonstrating its military power to the West. Writes about this the author of an article for the British edition of the Daily Express.

The United States sent its warships to the Black Sea - the flagship of the Sixth fleet command ship USS Mount Whitney and URO destroyer USS Porter. As stated in Washington, the ships were sent to conduct joint operations with pro-NATO allies and alliance partners. Russia greeted the Americans with military exercises of the Black Sea Fleet, thereby showing that they were not welcome here.



As the press service of the Russian Ministry of Defense reported, both American warships were taken under continuous surveillance by the forces and means of the Black Sea Fleet. Thus, Russian ships and submarines track all the actions of the Americans conducting their own exercises in the Black Sea.

By the actions of Russian ships, Putin sends Biden a warning about the growth of Russia's military power in the Black Sea, the author of the article believes.

The Russians demonstrate their strength, as if saying that they are not afraid of NATO ships and are ready to respond to possible incidents.

In addition, the demonstration of force is also aimed at preventing a new provocation by NATO ships off the coast of Crimea, which Russia considers to be its own after the events of 2014.

The article resonated with British readers who commented on it quite actively. Some commentators reacted negatively to the actions of the Russian fleet in the Black Sea, claiming the right to free navigation. Another part criticized the United States for escalating the situation off the coast of Russia.
  • https://twitter.com/mod_russia
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    9 November 2021 07: 58
    Of course not happy.
    Interestingly, what would this newspaper write on the entry of Russian ships where is the thread in the Hudson Bay, or there at the mouth of the Thames?
    1. +5
      9 November 2021 08: 03
      Yes, they are indignant every time our warships pass through the English Channel.
      1. -1
        9 November 2021 08: 13
        Quote: Anarchist
        Yes, they are indignant every time our warships pass through the English Channel.

        Well, yes. What if they don't pass by, but turn "not there"? Where should they then flee from the islands?
      2. +9
        9 November 2021 08: 25
        The English Channel is the English Channel. Public road. But in the Black Sea, they are absolutely fucking doing. Like us, for example, in the Gulf of Mexico.
        1. -4
          9 November 2021 09: 03
          Not only Russia has access to the Black Sea and, logically, it is not for her to decide who to sail there, especially the Bosphorus beyond Turkey.
          1. +4
            9 November 2021 09: 10
            Quote: Kronos
            Not only Russia has access to the Black Sea and, logically, it is not for her to decide who to sail there, especially the Bosphorus beyond Turkey.

            Swimming and reconnaissance, and even more so to arrange provocations, are completely different things.
          2. +4
            9 November 2021 09: 16
            We will share the Black Sea with the Turks and other Black Sea countries. The rest of the military do not fucking there.
            1. -4
              9 November 2021 09: 24
              It remains to find out if they agree to "divide" it according to your
              1. +5
                9 November 2021 09: 31
                Not by any "our", but by the absolutely obvious: the non-Black Sea states are absolutely not concerned with the affairs of the Black Sea. Except for peaceful ships. Or even military, but exclusively with friendly visits, with the consent of all the Black Sea states.
                1. -3
                  9 November 2021 09: 36
                  And nothing that Turkey, Bulgaria and Romania are NATO members.
                  1. +2
                    9 November 2021 09: 39
                    Why is NATO needed at all?
                  2. +3
                    9 November 2021 10: 40
                    Quote: Kronos
                    And nothing that Turkey, Bulgaria and Romania are NATO members.

                    Is it okay that NATO is a military bloc that threatens Russia?
              2. +2
                9 November 2021 10: 17
                Do they have a choice? Why is the world community as a whole and Turkey in particular so opposed to the annexation of Crimea to Russia? Are they so worried about the offended Okrainian state? It didn’t stop them at all ... But the Russian Crimea, with the Russian military bases, from which the entire Black Sea and most of the coastal states are shot with missiles, is like a bone in the throat ... Being the masters of the Bosphorus, in strategic terms, was very great ... And now, when Russia is able to sink any ship in the Bosphorus without leaving the sea, it is no longer so interesting ...
    2. 0
      9 November 2021 09: 11
      British press: Putin sends Biden warning of rising military power in the Black Sea

      Why only Biden? You, in particular, too! We will merge you together.
      Although you have a chance to merge on your own.
  2. +1
    9 November 2021 07: 58
    The further it gets worse ...
    Where is this world heading? ...
    In the end, if you do not react to these provocations, then the Yankees will be completely cut off!
    They will run into it in the end!
    1. -2
      9 November 2021 08: 17
      They were just scared, well, they would sink our 1-2 troughs of striped ones, after all, they are not the last ones with them, but they will scream, for this they are masters of the spoken genre. wassat
      A joke of humor, for those who do not understand.
      1. +7
        9 November 2021 08: 52
        Quote: Ros 56
        for this they are masters of the conversational genre

        just in case, let me remind you that so far these "masters of the spoken genre" are the only ones on the planet who have been noted in the combat use of nuclear weapons.
        for these "masters of the spoken genre" the lives of hundreds of thousands of foreign civilians are just a bargaining chip in their big games
        1. -6
          9 November 2021 09: 10
          To me, too, whether they discovered America or did not notice that it is the 21st year of the 21st century on the street. fellow
          1. +7
            9 November 2021 09: 12
            Quote: Ros 56
            To me, too, whether they discovered America or did not notice that it is the 21st year of the 21st century on the street.

            just reminding the giggling pranksters that the predator remains the predator.
            and requires the most serious attitude towards itself.
            1. -1
              9 November 2021 09: 16
              Our MO is aware of this.
  3. +6
    9 November 2021 08: 00
    the author of the article. The Russians demonstrate their strength, as if saying that they are not afraid of NATO ships and are ready to respond to possible incidents. In addition, the demonstration of force is also aimed at preventing a new provocation by NATO ships off the coast of Crimea, which Russia considers to be its own after the events of 2014.
    Such statements are not often found in the Western media. Unfortunately, they drown) in the Russophobic stream.
  4. +7
    9 November 2021 08: 03
    the demonstration of force is also aimed at preventing a new provocation of NATO ships off the coast of Crimea
    So the British agree that their ship was a provocation. Commendable.
  5. +7
    9 November 2021 08: 05
    claiming the right to free navigation.

    Shipping concerns civil ships, and military ships.
    Nobody bothers them to walk around the World Cup within the framework of contracts, just a little under the gun.
    Just in case.
    1. +4
      9 November 2021 08: 16
      Another part criticized the United States for escalating the situation off the coast of Russia.

      What smart people - they recognize Crimea as Russian, and criticize the United States. Not everything is rotten in the Kingdom
  6. +3
    9 November 2021 08: 21
    It would be better to practice the skills of destroying targets on the "guests".
    And the fact that they were sent, they apparently do not care.
  7. +8
    9 November 2021 08: 23
    I remember one American journalist girl more than clearly showed the essence of the matter on a map. "This (shows on the map) is the United States of America. This is Russia. And here is the Baltic Sea" (where the next meeting of the American warship and our planes took place). "The question is - who's on whose doorstep ?!"

    If such elementary things are clear even to an American girl, then their rulers understand this even more so. They are literally pushing the whole world towards disaster.
  8. +3
    9 November 2021 08: 37
    The Black Sea is a puddle for the oceanic fleet. Therefore, it makes no sense to bring something serious here, the Russians will sink them with coastal complexes. But to create a nervous situation, to catch up with fear through the media, this is exactly the role of these two ships
  9. +3
    9 November 2021 08: 40
    Russia conducted a series of military exercises against the background of two US warships entering the Black Sea, thereby demonstrating its military power to the West.

    Russia must show the West that the presence of third-party warships in the inner Black Sea is unacceptable from a security point of view. Electronic warfare means should make impossible any NATO exercises in the Black Sea. Russia is obliged to notify the participants that in the event of any provocations and violations, the perpetrators will be destroyed as sources of military aggression, and not chase destroyers that do not recognize Russian sovereignty.
  10. +3
    9 November 2021 08: 42
    Earlier, in news articles based on texts from foreign media, at least the name of the author was indicated. The editors never gave a link to the source.
    Today, even the author has disappeared.
    As it turned out, this is Ciaran McGrath.
    Why is it so?
  11. 0
    9 November 2021 08: 43
    It's good that they come closer to us.
    There is nothing better for the Armed Forces and the Navy than training on real targets.
    1. -2
      9 November 2021 09: 02
      Quote: zwlad
      It's good that they come closer to us.
      There is nothing better for the Armed Forces and the Navy than training on real targets.

      Here the other day two more used coastal boats were "presented" to Ukraine. Just for provocations near the Crimea, they will go, Well, training for the Armed Forces and the Navy will be "served on a silver platter")))
      1. +2
        9 November 2021 09: 20
        Well, these can be put to the bottom as soon as possible, if they themselves do not sink.
  12. +3
    9 November 2021 08: 55
    Quote: Pavel73
    If such elementary things are understandable even to an American girl, then their rulers understand this even more so.

    Her the rulers of course understand. But they lay down on the opinion of a peace-loving girl.
  13. +3
    9 November 2021 09: 08
    By the actions of Russian ships, Putin sends Biden a warning about the growth of Russia's military power in the Black Sea, the author of the article believes.

    When the Russian Navy begins to conduct its exercises in the Gulf of Mexico, then this will be a "warning".
    In the meantime, this is pure defense.
  14. +1
    9 November 2021 09: 26
    And in the USA, meanwhile, a course is being laid - for the navigational dolphin ...

    ... to the nearest rock feel
  15. +1
    9 November 2021 09: 52
    Americans, while they behave well. They stand in Batumi, eat churchkhella, wash them down with wine and watch dances with daggers. This is a commotion in Georgia, Mishiko was urgently translated, “your house is turm.” This should have been done right away. And she is not, such a bummer. I hope methods of physical influence were applied to him after he attacked the medical staff and broke expensive medical equipment. Today I would take him for a walk in the prison yard, along with the children who were planted during his time. Let them talk to him, and tell him how they got there.
  16. +1
    9 November 2021 10: 36
    I have noticed for a long time that the British press, like the Chinese press, are instigators in all issues that arise.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"