Iran conducts comprehensive military exercises to practice actions against the United States

54

On the morning of Sunday, November 7, the Iranian army began large-scale military exercises at sea, land and in the air. The exercises are planned to involve both army units of the ground forces and unmanned aerial vehicles, missile systems, and radar systems.

Abdolrahim Mousavi, the commander-in-chief of the Iranian army, told state television that the exercise will take place over a vast area of ​​almost one million square kilometers, in the area east of the Strait of Hormuz. On land, the exercises will take place in the provinces of Sistan, Baluchistan and Hormozgan, as well as on the Makran coast.



According to the Iranian commander, the armed forces will work out options for action against the American army, since it is in these areas that the United States is showing increased activity. Therefore, the Iranian troops will work out the scenarios for the defense of the coast from the landing of enemy troops.



On the first day of the exercise, Iranian forces simulated a commando attack on the coastline, and radar and missile systems were deployed to build coastal defenses. Iranian state television showed footage of boats maneuvering at sea, ground forces and marines. Representatives of the country's authorities reported on the growing capabilities of the armed forces in terms of resisting the actions of a potential adversary.

In Tehran, the exercise was linked to US plans to prevent the sale of Iranian oil and ensure compliance with the sanctions imposed on Iran.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Bat
    -13
    8 November 2021 15: 02
    If the US decides to break the back of Iran, no amount of exercise will help it! There is no reception against scrap if there is no other scrap. There is not one scrap that will intercede for Iran
    1. +4
      8 November 2021 15: 09
      Quote: Yarasa
      If the US decides to break the back of Iran

      will not decide, but will decide
      but this is unlikely
      their miscalculation in the war with Iran could result in the loss of positions in the Middle East
      no, the states will not risk Israel's welfare
      1. Bat
        -9
        8 November 2021 15: 11
        Quote: Flood
        will not decide, but will decide
        but this is unlikely

        I wouldn't think so.

        Quote: Flood
        their miscalculation in the war with Iran could result in a loss of positions

        What is the miscalculation? If the United States begins to break their backs, and in response Iran fires at Israel, then the United States will have a lot of friends in this nix. Believe me.

        You overestimate the importance of the Iranian Armed Forces too much.
        1. +2
          8 November 2021 15: 20
          Quote: Yarasa
          What is the miscalculation?

          any miscalculation leading to a missile strike
          1. -2
            8 November 2021 21: 07
            Quote: Flood
            any miscalculation leading to a missile strike

            Iran has less than a hundred missiles capable of reaching Israel, the rest simply do not reach.
            90% of this hundred will shoot down the missile defense, and the remaining ten will not do the same.
            In Syria, they also failed to amass a meaningful arsenal, because Israel regularly destroys reinforcements.

            Without nuclear weapons, Iran can only spoil Israel on trifles.
            The Mossad prevented Iran's planned terrorist attacks on Israelis in Africa.
            https://detaly.co.il/mossad-predotvratil-seriyu-iranskih-teraktov-protiv-izrailtyan-v-afrike/
            1. +2
              8 November 2021 21: 49
              Iran is seriously preparing to confront the United States. Only his strength to resist the gygymon is not enough ...
              1. -3
                9 November 2021 03: 33
                Quote: Vladimir Mashkov
                Only his strength to resist the gygymon is not enough ...

                This is to put it mildly. An antediluvian army, building a strategy on the "zerg-rush" of cannon fodder, as in the Iraq-Iranian war.
                Their trouble is that with the invention of napalm and cluster munitions, the combat value of cannon meat tends to zero.
                As well as their technological component, despite their purely oriental bragging and pouting cheeks.
                They bark at Israel like a dog, knowing that a fence (2000 km) separates it from the barking object. Isn't it strange that these "formidable warriors" silently wipe themselves off when the IDF Air Force cut them out in Syria, sometimes with entire fort posts, often disposing of the middle and senior officers of Ksir?
                All these gestures with "preparation" are propaganda for internal use. The only thing they can really do is smear with petroleum jelly so that the peach does not break much.
        2. 0
          11 November 2021 11: 44
          Quote: Yarasa
          You overestimate the importance of the Iranian Armed Forces too much.

          I wonder how you assess the "significance of the Iranian Armed Forces"? Name at least one country in the East that managed to successfully resist the mattress, as Iran did in 1979? Have you been to Iran yourself? In the 90s, I was amazed by the huge number of military personnel in this country, and if we also take into account their attitude, then the mattresses there will have to be very tight! Therefore, I would not so unequivocally assess their BC.
      2. +3
        8 November 2021 15: 41
        Quote: Flood
        their miscalculation in the war with Iran could result in the loss of positions in the Middle East no, welfare of Israel states will not risk

        Please expand your thought in more detail.
        1. +2
          8 November 2021 15: 46
          Quote: Vitaly Gusin
          Please expand your thought in more detail.

          if there is a risk of unacceptable damage to Israel, then the United States will not take such a risk
          all US policy in the Middle East is built around Israel.
          it is a key figure in American politics in the region.
          and it is more expedient to maintain the status quo than to take the risk of weakening this figure
          what is there to unfold?
          1. -3
            8 November 2021 16: 19
            Quote: Flood
            what is there to unfold?

            Quote: Flood
            if there is a risk of unacceptable damage to Israel, then the United States will not take such a risk

            And what has the USA to do with it, Israel has always DECIDED what is acceptable to it and what is not.
            Quote: Flood
            all US policy in the Middle East is built around Israel.

            But Israel also has its own policy, which relies primarily on SAFETY your country.
            Quote: Flood
            it is a key figure in American politics in the region.

            Yes, but if you are proficient in this issue, then it is not only in American politics.
            That's why I asked to unfold.
            By the way, the map given from the article by Oleg Ivanov is very dubious, especially the last point.
            No specialist has confirmed the presence of the Sajil missile.
            And the rest, more likely to fall in Iraq or Jordan.
            1. 0
              8 November 2021 16: 23
              Quote: Vitaly Gusin
              And what has the USA to do with Israel itself always DECIDED what was acceptable to him and what was not

              despite the fact that it was about the United States
              see root comment
              Quote: Yarasa
              If the US decides to break the back of Iran
            2. 0
              8 November 2021 19: 35
              Quote: Vitaly Gusin
              And what has the USA to do with it, Israel has always DECIDED what is acceptable to it and what is not.

              Very funny))))
              I would look at how Israel will decide for itself at least something when the States completely stop supporting))
              1. 0
                8 November 2021 19: 38
                Not funny at all .. I would look at when the Jews stop supporting the states ...
                Ps. Although, as Lebanese officials explained today. It was revealed today that Jews and Israelis are not the same thing ..
              2. -1
                8 November 2021 22: 42
                Quote: Ramzaj99
                I would look at how Israel decides itself at least anything, when the States are completely

                You were born late, so you didn't see how it was.
                If you want to look serious, study the history of the matter.
                1. +1
                  9 November 2021 09: 52
                  Quote: Vitaly Gusin
                  You were born late, so you didn't see how it was.

                  I was born when it was necessary ...
                  And I know perfectly well that if it were not for the USSR, there would be no Israel at all ...
                  you need to be grateful and not the States praying ...
                  1. +1
                    9 November 2021 14: 44
                    Quote: Ramzaj99
                    And I know perfectly well that if it were not for the USSR, there would be no Israel at all ...

                    You only know what you were taught in Soviet school, and the real story looked like this.

                    November 2, 1917 of the year a document was issued by the Foreign Secretary of the British Empire Lord Arthur James Balfour (the text can be found on the Internet)
                    You should know that during the publication of the Balfour Declaration the term "Palestine" referred only and exclusively to the geographic region that included the historical Land of Israel (Hebrew "Eretz Yisrael") and not to a political entity, as no independent or sovereign entity called "Palestine" ever existed.
                    July 24 1922 year by the decision of the League of Nations (the predecessor of the UN), adopted to create a mandate in Palestine / Eretz Yisrael. By this decision, adopted as an act of international law, the League made the British Empire responsible for the implementation of the Balfour Declaration with the aim of "creating a national home for the Jewish people in Palestine." Mandate of the League of Nations, legally enforceable, recognized the "historical connection of the Jewish people" with the region known in history as the Land of Israel, Judea and the Holy Land.
                    In 1947, on the basis of the Balfour Declaration and the Mandate of the League of Nations adopted by the UN General Assembly on the division of the mandate territory to the Jewish and Arab states. This decision was supported by 33 states, which included the USSR.
                    For: 33
                    Australia, Belgium, Bolivia, Brazil, Byelorussia, Canada, Costa Rica, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, France, Guatemala, Haiti, Iceland, Liberia, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Panama, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Sweden, Ukrainian SSR, South Africa, USA, the USSR, Uruguay, Venezuela.
                    Against: 13
                    Afghanistan, Cuba, Egypt, Greece, India, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey, Yemen.
                    If the USSR, Ukrainian SSR ,Byelorussia voted against, it would be.
                    For 30, against16
                    So much for the role of the USSR.
                    But the role in the desire, by the hands of the Arab countries, to destroy Israel cannot be minimized.
                    1. -1
                      9 November 2021 15: 11
                      Jews can notably twist history)))
                      1. +1
                        9 November 2021 15: 56
                        Quote: Ramzaj99
                        Jews can notably twist history)))

                        This is on Russian sites, in general I do not mind, you can continue to study the history of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. Good luck in your hopeless business. hi
          2. 0
            8 November 2021 22: 54
            Quote: Flood
            if there is a risk of unacceptable damage to Israel, then the United States will not take such a risk

            In the event of a "bulk", the Persians can easily swing the Palestinians and gas workers, push the Lebanese - to supply them with seamless pipes and sugar ... wink For a month - the other Judas will have something to do ... hi
    2. +4
      8 November 2021 15: 20
      It is clear that the United States is superior to the Iranian army in all decisive indicators, and the operation may proceed according to the Iraqi scenario, plus, possibly, Israel and the SA will join, and this is already a coalition. It will be hard for Iran. But there is one important factor - an assessment of the risks and losses unacceptable for the United States, wherever you climb with a weapon - losses are inevitable and considerable losses. If direct aggression against the United States is one thing, but another "crusade" in the name of "democracy" is another. The Americans ate their fill of lead, and in a relatively short time period.
      1. +2
        8 November 2021 16: 39
        if the United States decides to do something with Iran, it will be like the bombing of Yugoslavia.
        1. 0
          8 November 2021 23: 14
          Quote: Momento
          if the United States decides to do something with Iran, it will be like the bombing of Yugoslavia.

          This means that there will be timely deliveries of Chinese air defense systems and, I would like to believe in it, Russian ones. After all, the intelligence services of China, Russia and Iran are able to obtain information in advance ... hi
          1. +1
            9 November 2021 06: 56
            any air defense is flawed in advance in an open conflict. obviously a fighter with a rocket in-in has obvious advantages: 1) the height of the radar 2) the height of the launch of the rocket 3) ease of transfer to the right place 4) well, and maneuvering for protection.
            in defense of air defense, you can specify the size of the radar and constant combat readiness. which is leveled by modern avaks, sometimes even by drones and saturation of combat readiness.

            so the air defense is good, but without adequate development of aviation, Iran will be defeated. regardless of the quality and quantity of air defense. the only question is how quickly. is there a difference whether they will resist for a week or for example two months? Well, the Americans will not lose 10 aircraft, but 40 ... the result is still predictable.
      2. -1
        8 November 2021 23: 01
        Quote: 76SSSR
        It is clear that the United States is superior to the Iranian army in all decisive indicators, and the operation may proceed according to the Iraqi scenario, plus, possibly, Israel and the SA will join, and this is already a coalition. It will be hard for Iran.

        The strongest army of the Ceeurops has been forgotten! Funerals and trophyers are still ... wassat
        1. 0
          8 November 2021 23: 13
          Quote: isv000
          The strongest army of the Ceeurops has been forgotten!

          Exactly! Without them, nowhere ...)
    3. -3
      8 November 2021 15: 23
      It's just that the US doesn't have enough plastic coffins in stock for the war with Iran.
    4. +4
      8 November 2021 17: 17
      Quote: Yarasa
      If the US decides to break the back of Iran, no amount of exercise will help it! There is no reception against scrap if there is no other scrap. There is not one scrap that will intercede for Iran

      To me, with your Azerbaijani exaltation, you remind one of the idiots who marched with the American flag towards Belbek and shouted "America is with us!" At least your army is exactly in the teeth of the Persians. And in which case the role of cannon fodder will be assigned to whom.
    5. -1
      8 November 2021 20: 55
      Iran conducts comprehensive military exercises to practice actions against the United States

      Saddam Hussein also accompanied, and Gaddafi ... what
      1. -1
        8 November 2021 23: 08
        Quote: And Us Rat
        Saddam Hussein also accompanied, and Gaddafi ...

        Both stepped on the same rake, not following the advice from the North ... I think the Persians took these childhood illnesses into account and will not allow either the bribery of the commanders or the screams of the fifth column ... hi
        1. -1
          9 November 2021 03: 14
          Quote: isv000
          without following the advice from the North.

          And what is this miracle advice that could help defeat an army that is MUCH superior technologically, professionally, economically and logistically? belay
          What could prevent the Yankees from shooting Saddam's "mighty" army like a fish in a barrel? To prevent a demonstrative flogging, for some misunderstanding called a war? request
    6. -1
      8 November 2021 22: 41
      Quote: Yarasa
      If the US decides to break the back of Iran, no amount of exercise will help it! There is no reception against scrap if there is no other scrap. There is not one scrap that will intercede for Iran

      Other crowbars should perfectly understand their order after Iran and therefore will help, explicitly or indirectly, the Persians. Mattresses, by the way, are clearly aware of this and think hard before striking. A vivid example of the DPRK is confirmation of this.
      1. -1
        10 November 2021 18: 12
        It is unlikely that anyone will be able to significantly help Iran. An exception can be made by some pro-Iranian paramilitary groups such as Hezbollah, which, with a serious mix, can be destroyed. No one from the states will help. In a couple of weeks or months, the air defense is knocked out, then aviation. Iran has weak air defense, with aviation it is even worse. Well, yes, Iran is not Libya or Yugoslavia. Well, it means they will beat you longer. Iranian missiles are unlikely to have a big impact on the final result. And the ground forces under air strikes ... a sad picture. The Iranian nuclear issue and the likelihood of war have existed for 15 years. They are not stupid in Tehran, they can continue this game for another 15 years. And in general, Iran has been under sanctions for 40 years.
  2. -4
    8 November 2021 15: 05
    Iran is oil. And the USA is an empty place with an ass kicked in Afghanistan. Both India and China need oil, but no one needs the United States.
    1. Bat
      -12
      8 November 2021 15: 14
      Quote: Cowbra
      Iran is oil. And the USA is an empty place with an ass kicked in Afghanistan.

      You write nonsense. It was the United States who kicked the Afghan region so hard that it seemed to nobody there. They have pulled out the invested grandmother long ago. And if they left, then they left not because they lost, but because it was necessary. Little zombie box look. I personally do not care about the United States, but your messages are too pretentious and childish.

      Quote: Cowbra
      Both India and China need oil, but no one needs the United States.

      The United States does not care about both India and China taken together. It is also very unprofitable for China to quarrel with the United States.
    2. -1
      8 November 2021 21: 32
      Quote: Cowbra
      And the USA is an empty place with an ass kicked in Afghanistan. Both India and China need oil, but no one needs the United States.

      Isn't it too presumptuous, so frivolous to write them off?
  3. +2
    8 November 2021 15: 06
    On the morning of Sunday, November 7, the Iranian army began large-scale military exercises at sea, land and in the air. The exercises are planned to involve both army units of the ground forces and unmanned aerial vehicles, missile systems, and radar systems.
    Cool picture, in the theme ... RPG shooting!
    So they have stronger, more impressive ones.
    At the expense of the ridge to break them, such as easily ??? And the costs, and the consequences, and what acquisitions from that to fuck? Difficult \ simple, who needs it and who can do it.
    1. Bat
      -8
      8 November 2021 15: 16
      Quote: rocket757
      At the expense of the ridge to break them, such as easily ??? And the costs, and the consequences, and what acquisitions from that to fuck? Difficult \ simple, who needs it and who can do it.

      Expenses? Are you joking? The Federal Reserve will print how many greens it needs. The US has never been interested in the consequences; without a war, the US economy will collapse. They constantly need war. And here there is oil and no democracy.
      There is nothing easy in this life, of course it is difficult, you need to plan, logistics and so on ... I always said, after Syria, Iran is the turn. And if the war starts and Russia does not fit, and China and even more so India (For Iran)
      1. 0
        8 November 2021 15: 57
        Quote: Yarasa
        And here there is oil and no democracy.

        There is oil ... but who will allow the minke whales to see it? Or are you sure that they will succeed "came, saw and killed" ... all who will interfere? Are you seriously betting on ... a tooth, for example?
        By the way, but in Syria everything is simple for them, did it work out?
        Another question ... and in Iraq they are also all type - top?
        You shouldn't ask about Afghanistan, probably ...
        1. 0
          8 November 2021 17: 19
          Quote: rocket757
          but who will admit the minke whales?

          and where did you get the idea that the states are eager for it?
          1. 0
            8 November 2021 18: 15
            ... ... And here there is oil and no democracy

            And where do you get the preferences then? Just "dispose" of your aging weapon and make a new one? The effect could be, if ... if only. In the current situation, it is not so obvious ...
            In general, you can explain and even argue for a long, long time, and there is only one judge, TIME.
            So let's see how it will be in real life.
  4. -1
    8 November 2021 15: 11
    It is necessary, it is necessary to put pressure on the Anglo-Saxons in all regions where they poke their noses. Vietnam and Afghanistan are examples of this.
    Russia is just about to patrol the Gulf of Mexico with Tu-160 strategists, and the stench from the United States has already gone.
    1. Bat
      -5
      8 November 2021 15: 18
      Quote: askort154
      It is necessary, it is necessary to put pressure on the Anglo-Saxons in all regions where they poke their noses.

      Well, there is no one who could bark at them. There was Khrushchev, there was the USSR, they could, and now no one can. They can just bark and bite, they cannot.
      1. +3
        8 November 2021 15: 41
        Quote: Yarasa
        They can just bark and bite, they cannot.

        Roughly like you, nodding for the Omerekan owner.
        1. +2
          8 November 2021 18: 22
          Quote: Vladimir_2U
          Roughly like you, nodding for the Omerekan owner.

          well, these, in Baku and its suburbs, are ordered to love America. Nothing new in essence. Judging by the way this hysterical propagandist and herald of the "Turkic world" is getting out of his way here, it is ordered to lick with a twinkle, not hesitating in expressions of devotion.
        2. +1
          8 November 2021 22: 03
          Your world is divided into proprietors and non proprietors? Although yes, serfdom is in the genes, another 50 generations and probably will allow it.
          1. -1
            9 November 2021 03: 21
            Quote: Refael
            Your world is divided into proprietors and non proprietors? Although yes, serfdom is in the genes, another 50 generations and probably will allow it.

            What, the Pale of Settlement is still the only gyrus? Or is the USA jealous?
            1. +1
              9 November 2021 14: 02
              Why are you answering a question with a question?
              1. 0
                10 November 2021 04: 26
                Quote: Refael
                Why are you answering a question with a question?

                What, bought the exclusive rights to it? I don’t see the bill of sale.
          2. -1
            9 November 2021 10: 38
            Quote: Refael
            Your world is divided into proprietors and non proprietors?

            he always shared that way. And it will continue to share.
      2. +1
        8 November 2021 18: 26
        Quote: Yarasa
        Well, there is no one who could bark at them.

        Well, the reasons for "why everyone needs to become US sixes" are clear. The view from Baku is no different from the view from, say, Kiev. True, the vassalage of the States is becoming more plain and noisy.
    2. +1
      8 November 2021 17: 21
      Quote: askort154
      Russia is just about to patrol in the Gulf of Mexico with Tu-160 strategists,

      what did they want to patrol? Migration of blue whales?
  5. +1
    8 November 2021 16: 25
    ... and Windows XP on computers.
    And what kind of security can we talk about?
  6. -1
    8 November 2021 22: 00
    Thank you, neighing lol Iran versus the United States. Two AUG and there is no Iran on the world map.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"