China tested weapons capable of destroying aircraft carriers and naval bases

The effect of inflicting damage on the enemy is achieved through the impact of a powerful blast wave. Thus, you can destroy a surface object or destroy a coastal port, discreetly delivering explosives to the target. The evidence of the existence of the underwater munition has not yet been presented. Information about the new Chinese "miracle bomb" in the Russian-speaking segment of the Internet appeared with reference to the British tabloid "Daily Mail" - the British, in turn, refer to sources in the Chinese military leadership, who report the test.

The full capabilities of the new technology have not yet been described. Part of the purpose of an underwater warhead is the ability to destroy objects on the surface of the water and coastal communications, including naval bases, of the enemy in order to damage enemy infrastructure. In the event of a conflict, you can quickly disable the material and technical base or communication between the links of defense or attack.

At the same time, Chinese sources hint at some specific prospect: during the tests, the blast wave completely destroyed a large surface object, therefore, even aircraft carriers are included in the list of vulnerable targets.

News about underwater weapons literally "pops up" in the context of the escalation of tension in relations between the PRC and Taiwan. It is noteworthy that simultaneously with the "sensation" from the British media, an interview with CNN appeared the day before, in which the head of Taiwan Tsai Ing-wen admitted the possibility of negotiations with China in order to resolve the problem of the conflict and find an option for "peaceful coexistence."

Comments

[rocket757]

anonymous sources hint at some specific prospect: allegedly during the tests by the blast wave, a large surface object was completely destroyed, therefore, even aircraft carriers are included in the list of vulnerable targets.

"Poor aircraft carriers" have come up with so many things to destroy them!
However, they go here and there and do not pose a small threat to many, for now!

[igorspb]

and don’t say - to destroy an aircraft carrier, as practice shows, one disgruntled sailor with matches is enough))

[tovarich-andrey.62goncharov]

Or a dummy pilot with weak nerves after Vietnamese zindan ...

[rocket757]

Quote: tovarich-andrey.62goncharov

Or a dummy pilot with weak nerves after Vietnamese zindan ...

"technological costs" ... alas, one cannot do without them in such a large and complex "case".

[Alexey RA]

Quote: tovarich-andrey.62goncharov

Or a dummy pilot with weak nerves after Vietnamese zindan ...

There was not a pilot there, but gunsmiths enthusiasts who, in order to reduce the preparation time for aircraft for departure, did not give a damn about the instructions and TB. This once again confirmed that the instructions are written in blood.

[Vladimir Mashkov]

And the Chinese are slowly preparing ... Just in case.

[rocket757]

"indestructible \ immortal" does not exist at all!
Simple / difficult ... for a targeted critical impact on effectively protected objects, it is necessary to spend an unreasonable amount of resources!
Those. DO NOT CHECK, DO NOT KNOW !!! But no one is going, for nothing, to substitute such an expensive object there and to those who can "hurt" ...

[s.adviser]

Not all of them died in the dock.

[rocket757]

This is what ... the Yankees have a landing ship, but our aircraft-carrying cruiser burned out.

[s.adviser]

It turns out two do not go. The best modern remedy against aircraft carriers is ship repair. How will it flare up and learn about other methods of fighting aircraft carriers.

[Alexey RA]

Quote: s.adviser

The best modern remedy against aircraft carriers is ship repair.

The best modern weapon against aircraft carriers is government social programs. The British nuclear-powered aircraft carrier CVA-01 is proof of this.

[bar]

Quote: rocket757

"Poor aircraft carriers" have come up with so many things to destroy them!
However, they go here and there and do not pose a small threat to many, for now!

They are like the elusive Joe. They walk as long as they are not needed by anyone.

[rocket757]

Quote: bar

They are like the elusive Joe. They walk as long as they are not needed by anyone.

This is understandable ... the object is expensive, pretentious, at the expense of efficiency, for a long time no one has checked in a risky situation, when in response it could fly in.
I doubt that they would really want to check who is who.

[Ashes of Claes]

Quote: rocket757

"Poor aircraft carriers" have come up with so many things to destroy them!

Yes, the list of "aircraft carrier killers" is being replenished)) From oiled rags in the hold to hypersound and Chinese firecrackers .. It's time for the Americans, apparently, to think about the disposal of AViks and the sale of aircraft to third world countries. Sadness. The era is gone.

[Ross xnumx]

This is how problematic issues are solved:

Taiwanese leader Tsai Ing-wen admitted the possibility of negotiations with the PRC in order to resolve the problem of the conflict and find an option for "peaceful coexistence."

You are going the right way, comrades Chinese ... And we have nothing to fear, especially since Russia has no aircraft carriers ...

[blackberry]

The title of the article talks about the trial, and the article talks about the rumors

[Cananecat]

Considering that the Chinese are very closely engaged in underwater drones, I can assume that they have created an analogue of Poisedon in a non-nuclear version.

[dzvero]

A conventional Poseidon would not be enough to cause a small tsunami. Perhaps they have a "jihad-submarine" - the old ones are not written off, but they loaded a dozen or two tons of TNT at the expense of the crew and equipment and forward ...

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: Mora

The title of the article talks about the trial, and the article talks about the rumors

Quote: Canecat

Considering that the Chinese are very closely engaged in underwater drones

Considering that the Chinese are closely engaged in various types of weapons, it is surprising how materials about the new weapon leaked to the press - they will quickly cut their tongue for unnecessary chatter ... along with their heads ...

[impostor]

An analogue of the Korean red shark?

[Mountain shooter]

Some kind of "hat" ... The Chinese more and more often make some kind of "stuffing" that violates the basic laws of physics ... but illiterate striped opponents are forced to strain very hard. I remember that they had a "supersonic submarine" flashed ...

[Petrik66]

What's that, they tamed and trained Godzila against the Yankes and Japs. A cattle swims under water to an aircraft carrier and once ...... there is no one else.

[APASUS]

The material does not describe the principle of operation, on the basis of which the blast wave is obtained, although it is very interesting what the Chinese have come up with.

The media published an interview on the eve of CNN, in which the head of Taiwan, Tsai Ing-wen, admitted the possibility of negotiations with the PRC in order to resolve the problem of the conflict and find an option for "peaceful coexistence."

Do the Americans need it? These negotiations will never happen. This is the basis of the entire US foreign policy and suddenly .................... for Tsai Ing-wen's sake, it will be rewritten! They won their ally France, let on board ........

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: APASUS

Do the Americans need it? These negotiations will never happen.

Are you talking about American military power now? We have seen, heard, we know ... So China is not a bastard, and the armament and strength of the Armed Forces will be more abruptly than the Taliban *. Yes, there in the USA (if anything) there are 1 930 202 –3 538 407 Chinese.
In a word, the voice Bestuzheva Washington in Southeast Asia is weak. That is why he knits South Korea and Australia with obligations.

[Jacket in stock]

And what was that?
Some kind of miracle underwater weapon with a powerful charge of explosives ...
Help, everything is gone, the Chinese are advancing ...
But it's not that this underwater weapon was invented 150 years ago and is called a torpedo.
But if this word is not mentioned, then it becomes terrifying how scary.

[Pandiurin]

Quote: Jacket in stock

And what was that?
Some kind of miracle underwater weapon with a powerful charge of explosives ...
Help, everything is gone, the Chinese are advancing ...
But it's not that this underwater weapon was invented 150 years ago and is called a torpedo.
But if this word is not mentioned, then it becomes terrifying how scary.

When a torpedo explodes under water, it will not do anything with the infrastructure on the shore, it is usually built from reinforced concrete, taking into account possible storms and hurricanes.

[Ashes of Claes]

Quote: Pandiurin

When a torpedo explodes under water, it will not do anything with the infrastructure on the shore, it is usually built from reinforced concrete, taking into account possible storms and hurricanes.

This is yes, but if you equip it with a 100 megaton TN warhead (project T-15) .....)

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: Jacket in stock

But it's not that this underwater weapon was invented 150 years ago and is called a torpedo.

The most interesting thing is the filling. In the United States, there is an explosive CL-20, which is 20 times more powerful than TNT (although the Indian version of CL-20 turned out to be 60 times more powerful than RDX; RDX is much more powerful than TNT).
In the recent past, an article flashed in the press that scientists from Kazakhstan had invented a high-power explosive, which is 1000 times more powerful than TNT. It was not possible to find material on this substance. Perhaps it was a fake.
It is impossible to completely abandon the possibility that some scientists will invent something of enormous power based on nanotechnology.

[Pandiurin]

Quote: Canecat

Considering that the Chinese are very closely engaged in underwater drones, I can assume that they have created an analogue of Poisedon in a non-nuclear version.

The news came from the Brit famous fake jets, especially about the Chinese threat.

But, in principle, such an option could theoretically cross the delivery vehicle of an underwater UAV for a covert approach to an object at low speed and with a low noise level and with a "vacuum" bomb ammunition.
Well, like a large barrel swam under the water, sprayed an aerosol, over the surface of the water or taking into account the wind (during a breeze) on the coastline and detonation. Well, the result is the same as that of AVBPM)

[Egoza]

Taiwanese leader Tsai Ing-wen admitted the possibility of negotiations with the PRC in order to resolve the problem of the conflict and find an option for "peaceful coexistence."

So it was worth talking about the "novelty" and right away: "Sha! No one is going anywhere"! Constructive thoughts immediately appear. It's good!!! )))

[From Tomsk]

stop publishing fakes

[Ashes of Claes]

Quote: From Tomsk

stop publishing fakes

The editorial staff of the Daily Mail swears by the editor-in-chief's mom!

[Yuriy71]

My grandfather, who went through the First World War, told me something else))) "It happens that a company will gather, forgive, fly in the direction of the Austrians - and they are blown away by the wind (shock wave)!))))) (

[Ashes of Claes]

In short, the toothless old women brought rumors to VO. Cover the void with a loud headline - that's our way.

[zwlad]

The news about underwater weapons literally "pops up" in the context of the escalation of tensions between the PRC and Taiwan.

This is probably the one that Connecticut got hurt about.

Taiwanese leader Tsai Ing-wen admitted the possibility of negotiations with the PRC in order to resolve the problem of the conflict and find an option for "peaceful coexistence"

First sound thought from Taiwan.
Apparently it starts to dawn on these people that America will not help.

[Basarev]

Well, what's wrong with that? A conventional anti-ship missile also hits the target with a blast wave, the problem is not at all in the method of destruction. And in range, flight altitude, speed, anti-aircraft maneuvers and, most importantly, target designation. This is the whole point - an aircraft carrier with its deck aircraft AWACS sees farther than any other ship, much farther. This problem is much more difficult to solve than to choose a method of defeat.

[Kerensky]

This is the whole point - the aircraft carrier with its deck aircraft AWACS sees farther than any other ship, much farther.

And the aircraft carrier at the wall does not see nifiga. And it is enough to break the tugs for him to stay there. There is a link in the message: an aircraft carrier - port facilities. Maybe the dog rummaged here? Say, there is a zyuka for the guaranteed destruction of an aircraft carrier, but ...... it must be moored first.

[Basarev]

True, a moored ship becomes vulnerable ... But just for such a case, security has been invented. It is not so easy to approach the aircraft carrier port: the command understands how valuable the ship has entered ... and will protect it by all available means.

[Kerensky]

It is not so easy to approach the aircraft carrier port: the command understands how valuable the ship has entered ... and will protect it by all available means.

This is where the Chinese could come up with a "herring joint" with a TNT equivalent.

[cniza]

China tested weapons capable of destroying aircraft carriers and naval bases

The United States is getting into a rash, let's see how they will get out ...

[maiman61]

"an interview with CNN appeared on the eve of the British media" - how can one refer to this cloaca of lies, hypocrisy and outright stupidity!

[victor_47]

It is theoretically possible to intercept a separate drone, of course, but if there are hundreds of attacks at the same time, then the object of the attack will become sour ...

[vova1973]

In the event of a serious war, aircraft carriers will sink with weapons with a nuclear warhead, and there is no need for precision missile guidance, the torpedoes will go not in the target, but in the direction.