Versatility advantages: potential of patrol ships of project 23550 "Arktika" / "Ermak"

44

Project appearance of the ship pr. 23550 "Arktika"

By order of the naval fleet and the Coast Guard of the Border Service are currently under construction of several universal patrol ships pr. 23550 "Arktika" or "Ermak". With their help, the defense in the Arctic direction will be strengthened in the foreseeable future. Due to a number of interesting and original solutions, patrol ships of the new type will be able to solve a wide range of combat and humanitarian missions, which determines their value for the fleet.

During construction


A promising project of a patrol ship with the code "Arktika" was developed at the Almaz Central Marine Design Bureau by the middle of the last decade. The first construction contract was signed in May 2016. According to its terms, the Admiralteyskie Verfy plant was supposed to build and hand over two ships in a complete set for the Navy by 2020.



In 2019, they announced plans to build two more ships for the SOBR. The corresponding order was given to the Vyborg shipyard. These ships will be made according to a modified project with the previous number and the name "Ermak".

The lead ship, project 23550, was intended for the Navy and was named "Ivan Papanin". It was laid down at the Admiralty Shipyards in April 2017. In October 2019, it was launched and transferred to the outfitting wall. According to reports of recent months, the afloat completion is being completed, and preparations are underway for mooring tests. The ship will be handed over to the customer no later than 2023-24.

Versatility advantages: potential of patrol ships of project 23550 "Arktika" / "Ermak"

The second ship for the fleet, Nikolai Zubov, began to be built in November 2019, and for now it remains on the slipway. Launching is scheduled for 2023-24, and the transfer of the Navy - in 2025. In July 2020, the laying of the first Ermak for the BOKHR, named Purga, took place in Vyborg. It will be launched in 2023, and delivery is scheduled for 2024. The second coast guard ship still exists only in plans, but it will be laid down in the near future.

The ship as a platform


The ship "Arktika" / "Ermak" is intended for work in the northern seas and must perform different tasks, which determined its technical appearance. In fact, we are talking about a platform ship with the ability to install a variety of equipment and weapons, the composition of which is determined by the customer in accordance with his goals.

NS. 23550 provides for the construction of a ship of the greatest length 114,5 m and the greatest width 19,5 m with a draft of up to 6,5 m. The total displacement reaches 8500 tons. The ship's hull has characteristic icebreaker contours and corresponds to the Arc7 ice class. Due to this, the maximum thickness of the ice to be overcome reaches 1,7 m. Continuous movement - up to 1 m.

The design of the hull and superstructure provides for the maximum possible internal volumes and the closed placement of the largest number of devices. This ensures that the crew is protected from cold and wind. A maximum of operations can be carried out without going outside. The superstructure is multi-tiered and has a complex configuration. It has volumes to accommodate various means, and a helipad with a hangar is located at the stern.


Launching "Ivan Papanin", October 25, 2019

NS. 23550 uses the so-called. a unified electric power system (EES) with full electric propulsion. The EEPS is based on four diesel generators with a capacity of 3,5 MW each. Such a system should provide a full-fledged power supply for rowing electric motors and general ship systems in all operating modes. In addition, a stock is created for feeding the additionally installed funds.

Two propeller electric motors with a capacity of 6,3 MW are responsible for the movement. A thruster is placed in the bow of the ship. The maximum speed in clear water is 18 knots. The cruising range, depending on the modification, is not less than 10 thousand miles.

"Arctic" and "Ermak" can carry different payloads and / or weapons. Motor boats and boats of various types are proposed to be placed in side compartments with hatchways, one on the left side and two on the right. The superstructure has a volume for one or two hangars for a helicopter. The aft part of the ship has a platform for placing additional loads in standard shipping containers, as well as a crane for self-loading.

Armament and equipment


According to known data, the patrol ships "Arktika" for the Navy will routinely receive barrel and anti-aircraft missiles. If necessary, they will be able to carry strike missile systems. Similar approaches were used in the Ermak project, but such ships do not need missiles.


Ships of two projects should carry a 76-mm AK-176M artillery system, two AK-630M anti-aircraft guns and four Kord machine guns. To protect against air attacks, the Arctic will receive portable anti-aircraft missile systems of modern models. Such weapons will allow ships to defend themselves against attacks from the water or from the air, or make the first strike against various targets.

It is reported that containers of the Kalibr-K missile complex - two launchers with four missiles on each - can be placed on the stern platform. It is also possible to use similar installations for Uranus missiles. The installation of missiles dramatically expands the capabilities of the patrol ship and almost makes it a universal combat unit. At the same time, the integration of shock complexes will be quick and uncomplicated. Nevertheless, in terms of missile potential, the Arctic will be inferior to specialized missile ships.

The ship of project 23550 is capable of transporting, launching and lifting on board several watercraft with a fairly wide range of characteristics. It is planned to use various boats on "Arktiki" and "Ermak", up to high-speed "Raptors". Boats and boats will provide patrolling and surveillance, as well as allow landing and boarding.


Ships for the Navy and SOBR will carry aviation technique. First of all, these are helicopters of the Ka-27 and Ka-226 families with the necessary equipment. The use of unmanned aerial vehicles is also expected. Ships of the "Arctic" type receive a hangar for one helicopter, and "Ermaki", due to a different composition of onboard equipment, will be able to transport two. Helicopters can monitor water areas, participate in intercepting intruders, and also perform other work.

New opportunities


Thus, due to the special design and modular approach to equipment and armament, promising patrol ships of the project 23550 will be able to participate in a variety of operations and events. The reinforced hull will allow them to work in clear water and in ice - independently or as part of a ship's detachment, incl. as an icebreaker. This dramatically expands the possible areas of work and the performance of the necessary work.

The proposed set of electronic and standard artillery weapons, as well as additional equipment will ensure the full and effective performance of all tasks typical of patrol ships. The availability of volumes and sites for placing additional funds is of great importance. In this case, "Arktika" or "Ermak" can be a carrier of strike missile weapons, a rescue vessel, a floating hospital, etc. Such a potential of ships is limited only by the needs of the customer and the ability to create modules with the necessary functions.


Laying-out of the ship "Nikolay Zubov", November 28, 2019

The modular approach allows for the unification of ships for the fleet and the coast guard with obtaining obvious advantages of a production and operational nature. It becomes possible to fully satisfy the needs of two different structures without developing two independent projects. In addition, construction is simplified and accelerated, incl. by several enterprises.

One for all


The observed processes in the international arena force our country to restore and rebuild defense in the Arctic direction. The navy and the coast guard play a special role in this defense - but they need ships of different classes, adapted to work in the harsh polar climate.

For this purpose, the project of the universal patrol ship "Arktika" / "Ermak" has been developed and brought to construction. In the standard configuration, such a ship is capable of patrolling or working as an icebreaker, and replaceable additional modules expand the range of tasks to be solved. Thus, one ship of a new type can replace specialized pennants of different classes, even if not simultaneously.

The new versatile ships will not only strengthen the defense of the Arctic and simplify the implementation of various events. Consistently performing different functions, they will partially replace the entire auxiliary fleet - and will accelerate the achievement of the necessary defenses in the northern direction. Even the four planned ships will have a noticeable effect of this kind, and the continuation of construction will lead to new obvious advantages.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    27 October 2021 18: 19
    To protect against air attacks, the Arctic will receive portable anti-aircraft missile systems of modern models. Such weapons will allow ships to defend against attacks from the water or from the air.

    In the case of non-military actions, it may be justified, and in the case of hostilities, the presence of a naval version of the Shell M would not hurt.
    The modular approach allows for the unification of ships for the fleet and the coast guard with obtaining obvious advantages of a production and operational nature.

    Well, and here the spears about modularity were broken in due time, so let's see how it works.
    1. +2
      27 October 2021 21: 45
      To protect against air attacks, the Arctic will receive portable anti-aircraft missile systems of modern models. Such weapons will allow ships to defend against attacks from the water or from the air.

      In the case of non-military actions, it may be justified, and in the case of hostilities, the presence of a naval version of the Shell M would not hurt.

      I think MANPADS will not have sufficient effectiveness. I can't understand one thing request Well, why do they need a 76-mm nasal gun mount AK-176M. Maybe the Nasal "Shells" with a 57 mm cannon would have been more justified?
      1. +3
        27 October 2021 22: 04
        76 mm bow AU is not a present. Of course you do. Such a ship can pull 100 mm.
      2. 0
        28 October 2021 09: 47
        because there are no shells with 57 mm, But the idea itself is good, relatively weak armament, as I understand in the event of an aggravation, the icebreaker will be covered with other ships
      3. +1
        28 October 2021 12: 12
        Quote: Guru
        I can’t understand one request Well, why do they need a 76-mm nasal gun mount AK-176M. Maybe the Nasal "Shells" with a 57 mm cannon would have been more justified?

        Yes, because this is an icebreaking analogue of Project 22160 - the former PSKR, which by the will of fate ended up in the Navy. Therefore, he is armed according to the standards of the FSB security guard.
    2. +14
      27 October 2021 22: 18
      Quote: lucul
      here spears about modularity broke at one time

      Apparently "they did not break the maleh ... And this is bad"! (with)
      It is good that specialized ice-class ships appear.
      That these are electric ships - also gut! That his RTV by air should provide a control center, at least for the naval version of the Thor M3, would also not hurt ...
      But the fact that there is not a word about PLO containers - schlecht ... For! The main threat to transports on the NSR is the British and US submarines. And if an anti-ship missile system arrives "from afar", then a self-defense complex (such as MANPADS) will not be enough ... Whatever one may say, but TOR is needed !!!
      So it turns out that either 2 x 40 feet, or 4 x 20 feet standard sea containers for this case need to be loaded ...
      And anti-ship missiles are self-indulgence ... Well, for complacency, 4 X-35Us can be loaded. But it is unlikely that they will really be needed there (as opposed to anti-aircraft defense / anti-aircraft defense).
      It seems like a breakthrough by Tirpitz on our polar paths is not expected ...
      AHA.
      1. +1
        28 October 2021 10: 41
        About PLO.
        There is only one question: how to combine the PLO equipment with icebreaker lines.
        So far, I only see the option with towed antennas, tk. nasal bulbs cannot be done - you can break it on ice.
        1. +3
          28 October 2021 14: 32
          Quote: alstr
          how to combine PLO equipment with icebreaker lines.

          There are two (three) ways:
          First, OGAS on the winch from the side, but for this you need to work on the "stop";
          the second - GPBA behind the stern, but again the ice floes can cut the "gut".
          And the third is to work with the Ka-27PL, but again the range is small, and hence the search performance.
    3. +1
      28 October 2021 12: 03
      Quote: lucul
      Well, and here the spears about modularity were broken in due time, so let's see how it works.

      In this case, modularity is good because it will allow unloading all the weapons ashore without long dismantling. laughing
      This is the second time the Navy has stepped on the rake of patrol icebreakers. Last time it was back in the USSR - then the Navy presented exactly the same plans for patrolling the extreme sections of the NSR, received armed icebreakers of Project 97P for this case, chased them for a couple of years and ... removed weapons and continued using its 97Ps as ordinary unarmed ICE for pilotage of ships and vessels.
      And the patrols of the border areas of the NSR were continued by the same ICE pr. 97P "neighbors" - from the MCHPV.
  2. +17
    27 October 2021 18: 20
    HM. earlier, for a photo of the ship at the demagnetization stand (and here you can still determine the spatial location) you could get rid of non-illusory problems from people without humor
    1. +4
      28 October 2021 12: 23
      Quote: Sadok
      HM. earlier, for a photo of the ship at the demagnetization stand (and here you can still determine the spatial location) you could get rid of non-illusory problems from people without humor

      And where is the demagnetization stand? The article contains three photos of "Ivan Papanin" from the descent: on the slipway, leaving the slipway, on the water.
  3. +8
    27 October 2021 18: 28
    Ships of two projects should carry a 76-mm AK-176M artillery system, two AK-630M anti-aircraft guns and four Kord machine guns. To protect against air attacks, the Arctic will receive portable anti-aircraft missile systems of modern models.

    Something seems to me that a 100-mm gun would be preferable, and against "air" or "Dagger", or "Pantsir-M".
    In "manual" one can only drive away some weak drone, and even then in a single attack. sad
    1. +8
      27 October 2021 19: 20
      The President was shown a model of Project 23550 armed with similar corvettes of Project 20385


      Incl. 8 UKSK and 16 UVP "Redut"
      1. +4
        27 October 2021 23: 55
        From these, for the Arctic zone, PLO ships can only make launching torpedoes and counter-torpedoes in the bottom of the hull so that they can be launched in the ice.
      2. 0
        29 October 2021 19: 15

        And here is the view of the stern. bully
    2. +23
      27 October 2021 19: 27
      Quote: K-50
      against "air" or "Dagger" or "Pantsir-M"

      The daggers are gone, but the Carapace, in my opinion, would not hurt. In our time, air defense is never superfluous
      1. +5
        28 October 2021 09: 47
        In our time, air defense is never superfluous

        It was, oh, how not superfluous in June 41, and now even more so, when all kinds of dirty tricks do not fly in the air, small and not so much.
      2. +2
        29 October 2021 19: 17
        Quote: Tugarin
        but the Carapace, in my opinion, would not hurt.

        Will freeze over. And you can't chip ice off of it.
  4. The comment was deleted.
    1. 0
      27 October 2021 20: 54
      Modularity is versatility.
      1. -1
        28 October 2021 08: 49
        Modularity is a Flaw! Imagine, the war has begun, the first large-scale strikes have been inflicted on infrastructure, bases, warehouses, personnel ... Who, Where and How will change / install these same Modules? Simply, it will not be up to that! And the team must be trained to work with new equipment! Are they being taught now? No!
        1. +3
          28 October 2021 11: 22
          Quote: Yuriy71
          Modularity is a Flaw! Imagine, the war has begun ... Who, Where and How will change / install these same Modules?

          All this is set in advance before delivery to the customer, depending on the ownership of the ships. Or do you think that ships without "filling" will be surrendered?
        2. -2
          28 October 2021 18: 14
          The entire crew on such ships is taught this on a mandatory basis - and what kind of war is this, your first large-scale attacks on infrastructure - this is already a 100% nuclear strike in response with the destruction of everything and everything within 30 minutes. There will no longer be any semblance of the Second World War.
  5. +4
    27 October 2021 19: 09
    So casually, at the Barents Region summit of foreign ministers, only Russia and Norway opposed the EU's initiative to completely ban the production of hydrocarbons in the Arctic. Gretta is raging. There are never enough icebreakers.
  6. -7
    27 October 2021 20: 47
    Another modular disabled person)
    1. -4
      27 October 2021 21: 07
      It's just that the development of different modules must be ordered now.
      1. +4
        28 October 2021 12: 32
        Quote: Tavrik
        It's just that the development of different modules must be ordered now.

        The development of various modules had to be ordered simultaneously with the development of the project of this ship. And even better - simultaneously with the development of the project of the previous modular ship - project 22160.
        But we, apparently, are asked not for modules, but for ships. So we are waiting for the next report on the commissioning of a modern modular ship ... without modules.
        1. +2
          28 October 2021 18: 00
          even without modules, this icebreaker is more armed than the much-touted Canadian icebreaker
          1. 0
            29 October 2021 13: 27
            Quote: Janerobot
            even without modules, this icebreaker is more armed than the much-touted Canadian icebreaker

            I just see an epic picture of a linear battle of icebreakers in the Arctic. smile
            The main enemy of icebreakers, as in the last war, will be submarines and aircraft. More precisely, the means of destruction they carry. And against them, our ICE has only a pair of ancient "blowtorches" and a short-sighted MANPADS.
      2. +1
        28 October 2021 13: 08
        Quote: Tavrik
        It's just that the development of different modules must be ordered now.

        So it seems that everything that is listed from the planned installation ("Caliber", SAM ...) has long been developed and produced.
        1. 0
          28 October 2021 20: 25
          please name at least one production model.
          but the fact that they carry models to exhibitions and we are well aware of it.
    2. +1
      27 October 2021 22: 05
      If this is a disabled person, then who will not ?! Can you name it?
  7. -2
    27 October 2021 21: 15
    An anti-aircraft missile for the UKSK would have been adapted for some reason ...
  8. 0
    28 October 2021 03: 31
    Calibers, Calibers ... and then Calibers.
    Well, what for a goat accordion?
    Indeed, it would be better to have a normal air defense and at least some kind of anti-aircraft defense. Why would he be blind and deaf to patrol? Only count bears on ice floes.
  9. +1
    28 October 2021 04: 20
    An excellent ship for the Arctic Coast Guard. Useless for the Navy.
    1. +1
      28 October 2021 05: 00
      Quote: Sahalinets
      An excellent ship for the Arctic Coast Guard. Useless for the Navy.

      In the article it is written as for the BOHR. I remember the old icebreaker PSKR "Anadyr" did 8-10 knots. This project for patrolling in the Bering Sea to control the catch of FBG is the best ...
  10. -1
    28 October 2021 08: 42
    A ship without air defense, but with "hand slingshots" - This is just Brad! How could the Developers have come up with such a thing !? They are "Enemies of the People"!
    1. +1
      28 October 2021 12: 09
      Quote: Yuriy71
      A ship without air defense, but with "hand slingshots" - This is just Brad! How could the Developers have come up with such a thing !? They are "Enemies of the People"!

      And since when do the developers themselves come up with something? Or have you forgotten that the design is carried out according to the TTT / TK of the Customer?
      What the Customer prescribed in the TK - that he received. And most importantly, what project the Customer approved - such a ship was built for him. So this pepelats is nothing more than the embodiment in the iron of the next mriy of our fleet.
    2. +1
      28 October 2021 13: 16
      Quote: Yuriy71
      How could the Developers have come up with such a thing !? They are "Enemies of the People"!

      Aha, demand to shoot everyone else. fool What have the developers to do with it? What they were ordered, then developed.
    3. -1
      28 October 2021 18: 22
      How could the Developers have come up with such a thing !? They are "Enemies of the People"! The designers probably forgot to ask you. And yes, they are aware that this icebreaker is part of the coast guard structure, and they have all anti-aircraft guns. But now there are separate modules of the same Shell and Thor - and they can simply be put on the deck and there will be a full-fledged anti-aircraft defense, the modularity of the ship allows you to do this.
      1. +3
        29 October 2021 14: 43
        Quote: Vadim237
        And yes, they are aware that this icebreaker is part of the coast guard structure, and they have all anti-aircraft guns.

        You are wrong. This icebreaker is part of the Navy. The Coast Guard has its own icebreakers of the same design.
        Our fleet enthusiastically continues to stamp on the rake of ordering ships designed for a completely different structure with completely different tasks. Covering all this mess with a fig leaf of non-existent modules.
        Quote: Vadim237
        But now there are separate modules of the same Shell and Thor -

        The modularity of "Pantsir" lies in the structure of the complex - a command module and several combat modules. But to install the same combat modules, reinforcements included in the design of the ship, underdecks, etc. are needed. - and sharpened specifically for this module.
        And who saw the sea "Thor"? Not the old Dagger, but the new Thor?
        1. 0
          3 November 2021 22: 39
          The removable Thor module on the ship was shown at the Military Acceptance and it worked from the deck of the ship for an air target.
          1. -1
            4 November 2021 12: 57
            Quote: Vadim237
            The removable Thor module on the ship was shown at the Military Acceptance and it worked from the deck of the ship for an air target.

            Is this this one?

            This is an autonomous combat module for ground air defense. It is unsuitable for a ship and was tested on the Grigorovich only in order to understand whether the Thor could, in principle, work at sea from the deck.
            The ship module does not need a rotating UVP. There is no need for radar, PU and control cabin packed in one module. And in general, a single autonomous combat module is not needed: because the radar must be placed based on the maximum field of view, range and EM compatibility (that is, put somewhere on the mast or on the superstructure), the launcher must be made as compact as possible and placed in the underdeck space - in those places where the launch of the missile defense system will not interfere with anyone and where it is possible to reload them without hindrance, it is better to carry the control cabin somewhere to the center of the ship + integrate the air defense missile system into the ship's BIUS. In general, for a shipborne modular air defense system, a conventional multi-module system looms: a radar module, a control module and several combat modules with missiles.
  11. 0
    27 November 2021 14: 42
    Powerful ship needed. Probably quite expensive. Striped ones don't build like that?
  12. 0
    12 December 2021 10: 25
    More ships, good and different

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"