"Calm" versus "Cliff" and "Bal": The Black Sea Fleet worked out the destruction of a group of enemy ships

Against the background of NATO statements about the need to increase the military presence of the alliance ships in the Black Sea, the Black Sea Fleet conducted exercises to destroy the enemy's naval grouping. According to the press service of the Black Sea Fleet, the project 11356 frigate "Admiral Grigorovich" played the role of a mock enemy.

As part of the exercise, the crew of the Utes coastal missile complex discovered a frigate, after which they launched a Progress rocket at it. The ship's crew detected the missile and destroyed the target at a distance of about 40 km using the Shtil anti-aircraft missile system. At the same time, the Bal ballistic missile system worked out striking at the naval group of the simulated enemy, firing the Kh-35 anti-ship missiles from camouflaged positions.

The press service of the Black Sea Fleet emphasized that the tasks of the exercises were completed in full, the missilemen practiced detecting and destroying the ships of the imaginary enemy, and the ship's crew repulsed a missile attack. The exercise area was closed to navigation in advance.

Note that exercises of this kind are far from the first conducted on the Black Sea navy.

Coastal missile system "Utes" (in the years of the USSR "Object-100", or "weaving") was created in 1957 in the area of ​​Cape Aya. Transferred to the Ukrainian Navy after the collapse of the USSR, the complex, consisting of two divisions, fell into disrepair: one division was mothballed, the second completely fell into a sky-ready state. Restoration work began in 2014 immediately after the reunification of the peninsula with Russia.

Created back in Soviet times, the Utyos complex is equipped with P-35 anti-ship cruise missiles with a firing range of up to 300 km, and since 1982 with a modification of this extended-range Progress missile. The flight range of the Progress anti-ship missile is up to 460 km.

Comments

[Peak]

Against the background of NATO statements about the need to increase the military presence of the alliance ships in the Black Sea, the Black Sea Fleet conducted exercises to destroy the enemy's naval grouping.

Against this background, interesting moments with the situation around Ukraine - "outpost of NATO in the confrontation with Russia","Shield of Europe" , from point of view - "And what about the Ukrainians?", especially in connection with the recent, quite unambiguous statements of the official Kiev ...

[rocket757]

Quote: PiK

"And what about the Ukrainians?" ,

They have no such means of attack and are not foreseen ... that is. they won't do it themselves. But what and who can put them, the question is complex / intrEsny at the same time. Previously, there were RULES, PROHIBITS, which at least somehow were fulfilled ... but now a "game" without rules has started.

[Peak]

Quote: rocket757

They have no such means of attack and are not foreseen

Just about this in the video. Check it out if you haven't already.

[210ox]

Corvettes may be supplied by Turkey. The question is whether they will risk kagal attacking us. Ukraine at sea does not represent anything, but the ground forces can resist. Regarding the "Cliff" - in the current conditions it is necessary only for launching targets, alas, it is outdated as a means of defense

[rocket757]

And what is on the video ... on the edge of the country there are only tactical POINTS, which are a hundred years old at lunchtime, some other old stuff that they somehow grumbled, grumbled and ... all their hopes for partners?
In general, to talk / talk about what is not, what's the point.

[ja-ja-vw]

Olesya has a rather specific position. (this is Censor. no or Go р don vice versa)
Well, Arestovich is a bit weak. I always hear him, only if there is something to pour into a glass, not less than 35 grams of fortress (you can't drink it with beer, doesn't take it)
and so:
-Ukrainians can, of course, create missiles that will "reach" for Moscow. And the technological and scientific base allows it.
- a greater threat to the fleet and the Crimea, especially from the west and southwest. One NATO around.

Yes, except for Turkey there is peyzan. But there are many of them and are developing

[Peak]

Quote: ja-ja-vw

Olesya has a rather specific position

More than specific, although she herself is from Gorlovka, now the DPR.

"Refugee", due to the fact that at one time she actively supported the Maidan coup in Ukraine.

T. Montyan in one of the stories very sarcastically walked through the whole "Strana.ua" and about this girl in particular, calling the group - "frill-viper."

It is about O. Medvedeva - from 28min50sec.

[bk316]

The lieutenant may already be enough to post pictures without even looking at them?
Well, what are 2 submarines in the Black Sea Fleet - THERE ARE SEVEN THEM
What year is the picture?

[ja-ja-vw]

Quote: bk316

The lieutenant may already be enough to post pictures without even looking at them?
Well, what are 2 submarines in the Black Sea Fleet - THERE ARE SEVEN THEM

I'm tired of you marshal, I'm very tired ...
malice and arrogance, so the cane
My answer is to sleep well:
6 of them, 871 under repair or dripping there. \
What difference does that make? Is it about the PL?
Could you even comprehend?

Quote: ja-ja-vw

more threat to the fleet and the Crimea, especially from the west and southwest. One NATO around.

I understand it's difficult, but .... we have to try.
Advice: go run the povets where I "inherited" from the "Big Dump."
/ sorry for being straightforward

[bk316]

I'm tired of you marshal, I'm very tired ...

Tired do not mess up, think twice, write one. If you were an ordinary thoughtless fighter, I would not have read your comments. And so you sometimes write interesting things, but every time to look for them in the mountains, copy-paste is really tiring.

By the way, you screwed up again, I'm not a marshal, these are the shoulder straps of an army general.

[ja-ja-vw]

Quote: bk316

Tired don't mess up, think twice, write one

generalisimo! Hey! well, what exactly is "the climax of the brain crept"?
I repeat once, how it comes to the giraffe
Map,

Quote: bk316

post pictures without even looking at them?

not about submarines, not about the number of S-300 Ukraine ...
Let there even be 8 "Boreis" will swim in the Black Sea.
The essence of the picture

Quote: ja-ja-vw

more threat to the fleet and the Crimea, especially from the west and southwest. One NATO around.

there you still count the Su-27!

Quote: bk316

By the way, you screwed up again, I'm not a marshal, these are the shoulder straps of an army general.

I will take into account the field marshal, I will take into account.
You are up to a real "general-army", not a clown one, like Rogozin to Mars.

[bk316]

I will take into account the field marshal, I will take into account.
You are up to a real "general-army", not a clown one, like Rogozin to Mars.

Young man, all sorts of tricks do not work on me, otherwise I would not be able to teach at Moscow State University for 10 years. It is very sad that you did not understand that poor quality pictures and fake quotes do not improve but worsen the quality of the comment.

If there is still a desire to strain the brain, then I will tell you there is such a thing as an outpost, which, by definition, is always surrounded by enemies. Kaliningrad and Crimea are outposts. And by the way, the United States has many hundreds of outposts around the world, they will not hysteria about this.

[ja-ja-vw]

Quote: bk316

Young man,

Quote: bk316

I would like 10 years at Moscow State University

unfortunate. I see the result ...

[Cat Kuzya]

The ship repelled one missile, but what if there are 20 of them (missiles)? 40? And among them there will be stealth and false targets and missiles with electronic warfare? Nobody conducts such exercises? To find out the real, not foolery, missile defense?

[Fantazer911]

The carapace, and the like, was created for such cases when a swarm of missiles will pour!

[Cananecat]

Quote: Kuzya the Cat

The ship repelled one missile, but what if there are 20 of them (missiles)? 40?

This is a guaranteed destruction by return fire not only of the aggressor's ship, but also of the base.

[rocket757]

The question is ... multi-layered, as usual.
Who, for whom and what ???
One thing has long been known, who acts more decisively, has sufficiently effective means of attack, has not small, sure chances to defeat the enemy ...

[Serg65]

Quote: Kuzya the Cat

and if there are 20 of them (missiles)? 40?

And all on one ship ... this ship is the most terrible on the planet, that all the fleets of the world will fight against it?

[Peak]

Quote: Serg65

And all on one ship ... this ship is the most terrible on the planet, that all the fleets of the world will fight against it?

For some reason , the overwhelming number of commentators takes into account only the naval component of the Black Sea Fleet, not taking into account the naval and army strike and anti-aircraft systems ...
And regarding this component, there is just something to talk about.

[Serg65]

Well, yes, if Grigorovich is on the BS in the Mediterranean ... so, too, is not one single person, well, just at him, then the whole salvo of the squadron ???

[I am not a robot]

well, even in the American navy, they are conducting fouvly exercises, launching one missile, and even a cruiser of the Ticonderoga type could not shoot down one missile (there is a photo on the network),
someone will launch 20-40 missiles at one ship, for example, destroyers have only 8 rocket launchers, but the new ones do not, that is, according to your opinion, it is necessary to send 5 destroyers of a berk against one of our frigates

[Niko]

Quote: Cat Kuzya

The ship repelled one missile, but what if there are 20 of them (missiles)? 40? And among them there will be stealth and false targets and missiles with electronic warfare? Nobody conducts such exercises? To find out the real, not foolery, missile defense?

There is not so much money. Yes, and it’s complicated, and what if it doesn’t work? How to write then a heroic report in the news?

[210ox]

All twenty will certainly not reflect. If the attacker has applied the whole range of means. But not one ship is at war

[lucul]

The ship repelled one missile, but what if there are 20 of them (missiles)? 40?

40 Harpoon missiles are about 5 NATO frigates. Are you going to fight alone against the fleet? )))

[Ros 56]

Education and military, too, it's a good thing, it's a pity, sometimes it comes to consciousness a little late.

[antivirus]

The flight range of the Progress anti-ship missile is up to 460 km.

-Waiting for the increase in range - UP TO 1500 KM-CYPRUS CONTROL AND GREECE PROTECT FROM THE USA

[Nafanya from the sofa]

Quote: Kuzya the Cat

The ship repelled one missile, but what if there are 20 of them (missiles)? 40? And among them there will be stealth and false targets and missiles with electronic warfare?

And if "finally stop a hundred"? Do you read such comments and think: "If you please joke," or really?

[Cat Kuzya]

Well, as if the tests of the Saudis of the "iron dome" were carried out with a large number of missiles (they say as much as 100 or even 1000!). And he reflected them with a probability of 0,95. Moreover, one battery (or several). And then one rocket .. just frivolous. Has the drone war in Karabakh taught anything? And on the way "controlled swarms".

[I am not a robot]

the battery is 3 pu 20 missiles = 60 missiles, how they were able to shoot down 950 missiles
and when such exercises were carried out in which up to 1500 missiles were fired at a cost of 30-40 thousand dollars each, this was not counting the target
and the Saudis do not have an "iron dome" (according to Wikipedia)

[Cat Kuzya]

I read about the recent test in Saudi Arabia of the "Iron Dome" of the mass attack of missiles and drones right here, on VO.

[I am not a robot]

Yandex and googol don't know anything about this, but anyone here seems to be able to write an article: some Israeli uryakla wrote nonsense and his fantasies (site search also showed nothing)

[rocket757]

"Calm" versus "Cliff" and "Bal": The Black Sea Fleet worked out the destruction of a group of enemy ships

It is possible to suppress a well-armed enemy ... there is no impenetrable defense, there is a shortage of means of attack.

[Peak]

Quote: rocket757

It is possible to suppress a well-armed enemy ... there is no impenetrable defense, there is a shortage of means of attack.

You can argue
For example, during the battle for Moscow, the Duftwaffe had enough (if not more) means to deliver strikes, but at the same time, faced with a whole range of various factors and effective opposition to Moscow's air defense, it did not cope with the tasks that were assigned to it.

Smooth only on paper ...

[rocket757]

It rarely goes smoothly, even when the opponents are not commensurate in military power, BUT, really great opportunities, with good preparation, correct, well-developed attack tactics, give undeniable advantages!
The Luftwaffe, and the Wehrmacht, faced a stubborn enemy who, in addition, had enough weapons to break the Ordnung !!!
Heroic resistance, this is very serious! The whole history of mankind proves exactly this.
But back to our sheep ... what an indisputable advantage our opponents can create in the "Russian Sea" ... in my opinion, everything is very doubtful.
By the way, this is true for everyone and always ... who can boast of having successfully captured a well-defended coastline? There were no such operations once, twice, and the attacking side always had an overwhelming advantage in all respects.

[Avior]

the Duftwaffe during the battle for Moscow had enough (if not more) means to strike

The Germans did not have such opportunities at that time, given that Moscow's air defense was more than strong, although this exposed other sectors of the front. The Germans generally had practically no means for strategic bombing, unlike the Allies, for example.
The air defense of the Moscow zone included

control
6th Air Defense Fighter Aviation Corps:
-23 Fighter Aviation Regiments
-8 aviation-based areas
19 anti-aircraft regiments (artillery, machine gun and searchlight)
13 separate anti-aircraft artillery battalions
three anti-aircraft machine gun regiments
three floodlight shelves
two VNOS regiments
two regiments of barrage balloons
separate communications battalion
training parts
The front's combat strength included:

about 500-600 fighters
1 anti-aircraft guns
430 anti-aircraft machine guns
1 floodlights
1 barrage balloons

Most of these funds directly defended Moscow, the rest covered the approaches. There were also battalions of the Defense Ministry.
The Germans did not even have the ability to oppose such air defense. In one raid, they brought together about 200 aircraft, and these were far from strategic allied bombers.

[Tektor]

Progress should be exchanged for Onyx or Zircon.

[Apollo]

It is hardly worth hoping that the grouping of enemy ships will be sent to the Black Sea without first suppressing the firing points of coastal complexes and airfields.

[Pavel57]

So what is stronger than a sword or a shield?

[Radical]

MMM yeah... . How often has happened here - the topic announced in the title moves down to the level ..., however, you see everything for yourself.