E-Jet synthetic fuel for the US Air Force

25

The main novelty from Twelve is a special electrochemical reactor. Still from the Twelve commercial

The US Air Force is interested in Twelve's new E-Jet synthetic fuel technology. This type of aviation kerosene is produced without the use of minerals, is carbon-neutral and requires only renewable resources. In addition, new technologies open up the theoretical possibility of producing fuel anywhere in the world, which could simplify the supply of remote bases.

Technology and ecology


The American company Twelve (formerly Opus 12) has been researching the production of synthetic liquid fuels over the past few years and looking for ways to obtain it without the use of fossil resources. At the same time, special attention was paid to aviation fuel. The full transition of airplanes and helicopters to electric propulsion is not possible, and therefore Twelve is trying to find an acceptable solution.



The promising project received support from the Air Force in the person of the Air Force Operational Energy. Last year, it became known about the completion of research work, and the manufacture of a pilot plant for the production of fuel began. For the near future, it was planned to receive the first volumes of new kerosene.

Preparations for such tests were completed this summer, and in August, the unit delivered the first batch of clean fuel E-Jet. The prototype system continues to work in the first phase of testing, which will last until December. Based on its results, the Air Force wants to receive a voluminous report reflecting all aspects of the new technology, its capabilities, as well as the prospects for full-scale deployment in the troops.


Disassembled reactor

Upon receiving positive results, the E-Jet project will move to a new stage. Production complexes will be developed that are suitable for full-fledged work and capable of producing large volumes of fuel. The possibility of creating mini-fuel plants for deployment in remote areas and simplifying their supply is also being considered.

Out of water and air


Twelve has already disclosed the main features of its technology and announced its benefits. Its production method is based on the well-known and mastered Fischer-Tropsch process. At the same time, fundamentally new means have been introduced into the production line, due to which environmental benefits are provided.

The Fischer-Tropsch process, created in Germany in the 50s, uses fossil raw materials such as coal. From it get the so-called. synthesis gas is a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen, which is then processed into a mixture of hydrocarbons and liquid fuel. There are many variants of this technology with different characteristics, and some of them are still used today. For example, the US Air Force has certified 50/XNUMX mixtures of "conventional" and synthetic aviation kerosene.

Twelve has found a way to ditch fossil raw materials. To do this, her project uses an electrochemical reactor of an original design based on a catalyst of her own design. The raw material in the form of carbon dioxide from air and water is converted into synthesis gas with the help of a catalyst and electricity. Subsequent processes for obtaining liquid fuel are similar to existing technologies.


B-52H bombers are real kerosene fighters. The tanks of one such aircraft contain 181 610 liters of fuel.

Environmental friendliness of production should be achieved through the use of energy from "green" power plants. The necessary carbon dioxide and, in the long term, water are proposed to be extracted directly from the air. As a result, a virtually zero "carbon footprint" is ensured: when the E-Jet is burned, the carbon that was previously extracted from it is emitted into the atmosphere.

The production volumes of the pilot plant were not specified. However, it is clear that a laboratory "production line" cannot cover the needs of even a single aircraft, let alone entire subdivisions. Nevertheless, in the future, it is planned to reach a new level, corresponding to the needs of consumers. In addition, the proposed technology makes it possible to obtain not only aviation kerosene, but also other types of fuel.

Tasks to be Solved


Twelve promotes its development as a profitable way to reduce the negative impact of aviation on the environment. The US Air Force also intends to take care of the environment, but they are interested in other possibilities of the E-Jet. The military is predictably attracted by the potential savings and simplified logistics.

The US Air Force is critically dependent on fuel supplies. They are provided with a complex transportation system, including tankers, tank trucks, etc. With its help, a constant supply of the entire range of fuels and lubricants to all parts and bases is carried out. However, in a conflict situation, any element of this system can become a target for an enemy strike, which will have the most serious consequences for the troops.


A KC-10 tanker aircraft transfers fuel to a B-2 bomber

The Pentagon expects that in the future, Twelve or another contractor will be able to create a mobile system for the production of synthetic fuels - kerosene, gasoline, etc. By deploying it at a remote base, it will be possible to reduce or even eliminate the need for the supply of fuel from the outside. This will reduce risks and losses, as well as reduce the cost of the remaining traffic.

The issue of fuel cost and delivery is of particular importance to the Air Force. Every year, aviation makes hundreds of thousands of sorties, which consume millions of cubic meters of fuel. For example, in 2019, approx. 800 million cubic meters of kerosene. Several billion dollars are allocated annually for aviation fuel alone.

Any new developments that can reduce the cost of fuel or reduce the cost of transporting it are of great interest to the Pentagon. Whether the E-Jet synthetic kerosene will be cheap enough to compete with the fossil fuel remains to be seen. But the ability to produce fuel anywhere can simplify logistics, which will also be an important advantage.

Technological challenges


With all the expected benefits, the new technology from Twelve is not mature and ready for full implementation. Moreover, until the completion of the first stage of the project and tests, it will be impossible to talk about its real prospects. However, it is already clear what tasks the developers have to solve in order for the project to go beyond the laboratory.


Air refueling of the latest F-15EX fighter

First of all, it is necessary to develop a full-fledged installation for the production of fuel, the characteristics of which will correspond to practical operation in the interests of real consumers. It should show a fairly high performance, but at the same time consume a reasonable amount of resources and energy.

Setting up a mobile plant for deployment to remote sites is particularly challenging. So, the installation needs power supply and water supply. The necessary infrastructure may not be available in the place of its deployment, and therefore you need to provide your own systems. Naturally, they should not need a fuel supply, otherwise the production of the E-Jet loses its meaning. Perhaps, in parallel with mini-fuel plants, compact power plants, such as atomic ones, will be developed.

It cannot yet be ruled out that Twelve will meet the technical challenges and create a full-size plant for the production of a new type of aviation fuel. However, the project is very complex, which can make the finished product prohibitively expensive. In this case, the Pentagon will lose interest in the E-Jet project or move it into a development niche with an eye to the distant future.

According to the test results ...


The Pentagon is seriously interested in alternative methods of obtaining liquid fuel and supports one of the most interesting projects in this direction. They speak openly about the goals of such work: the Air Force wants to reduce logistical risks, as well as reduce the negative impact on the environment.

However, the prospects for the E-Jet project are still uncertain, and some clarity will appear only at the end of this year. The customer will then be able to evaluate the performance of the pilot fuel production plant and determine whether the work is worth continuing. Obviously, the fate of the new project depends precisely on the technical and economic characteristics. If they are insufficient, no rhetoric on environmental topics will help the project.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    26 October 2021 18: 32
    With all the expected benefits, the new technology from Twelve is not mature and ready for full implementation. Moreover, until the completion of the first stage of the project and tests, it will be impossible to talk about its real prospects.
    Straight "the alchemist's pot" in which the "philosopher's stone" was hidden !!!
    Wonders of science, in a word!
    1. 0
      9 January 2022 07: 23
      The Nazis made synthetic gasoline for tanks in the Second World War and did not learn how to make synthetic diesel fuel ...
      1. 0
        9 January 2022 08: 54
        That gasoline was not winter-hardy ....
  2. -4
    26 October 2021 18: 35
    -Perhaps, in parallel with mini-fuel plants, compact power plants, such as atomic ones, will be developed.
    E. no. Fuel should be "green", what kind of nuclear power plants.
    The Swiss "Sun-To-Liquid" project is producing fuel in a pilot plant that uses fully solar-powered reactors.
    And what will happen to nature even if there is a shortage of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, if everyone starts to produce synthetic fuel using this technology?
    1. +1
      26 October 2021 22: 07
      Quote: knn54
      And what will happen to nature even if there is a shortage of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere?
      And what will happen to her dear when there is a shortage of water in the atmosphere? lol
    2. 0
      26 October 2021 23: 06
      Quote: knn54
      And what will happen to nature already with a shortage of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, if all together start to produce synthetic fuel using this technology?

      Carbon dioxide as a by-product in production is everywhere.
      Coke is produced from bituminous and brown coal and coal mixtures in special furnaces at a temperature of approximately 1200 ° C, at which they are degassed. In coke oven gas - 10% CO
      ROLLS PRODUCTION, CAST IRON PRODUCTION (the largest CO2 emissions in the metallurgical industry), STEEL PRODUCTION.
      on the chemistry of plastic, a lot of CO and CO2 flies out.
      CO and CO2 - there is enough from the industry for everyone
  3. +1
    26 October 2021 18: 59
    The raw material in the form of carbon dioxide from air and water is converted into synthesis gas with the help of a catalyst and electricity.

    Perpetum mobile?
    Personally, the photo at the beginning of the article most of all reminds me of a photo of a "secret turbine" vacuum cleaner from "Our Man in Havana" by Graham Greene
    1. -5
      26 October 2021 20: 04
      Perpetum mobile?

      You are ... where are you going with your critical thinking)))
      Do not deprive Russophobes of the last hope that Russia is about to fall apart)))
      1. -1
        31 October 2021 06: 45
        Quote: lucul
        Do not deprive Russophobes of the last hope that Russia is about to fall apart

        Russia will fall apart (or rather, it will fail) when green energy really "gets hotter" in the world. In the meantime, on the contrary, Russia is in the aces, gas prices have risen and oil has returned to high prices. But, it won't be for long. I am afraid that the Western countries, taught by the current "gas lesson" at $ 2000 per cubic meter of gas, will go to their own energy as scalded. And especially green and atomic. And they will do it, do not hesitate ... And then gas and oil will go to zero ...
        1. 0
          10 January 2022 17: 54
          Russia will collapse (or rather, it will fail) when green energy really "gets hotter" in the world.

          The share of energy resources in Russia's GDP seems to be steadily falling, and the green energy sector will not “get hot” yet.
          But there is another question here. Few can now argue that we are at the beginning of the ice age. It's just that many calm themselves that it will be somewhere far beyond the horizon, in thousands of years. But no one will make any predictions for sure. And if there is some kind of cold snap in the likeness of the Middle Ages, even for a period of 5-10 years, all this green energy will lead to the real death of millions of people. And it is precisely the countries with fossil energy resources and nuclear power plants that will survive. Personally, it seems to me that a total transition to green energy is putting all the eggs in one basket. Moreover, this basket is very fragile. There is no more dangerous people on earth than the warlike and ignorant "green".
    2. -1
      27 October 2021 17: 07
      No, not perpetuum. At a certain stage of the technical process, external energy (electrical) is pumped in, which is spent on the splitting of carbon dioxide. Then this energy is returned in the form of useful work (plus losses) and dissipated in the atmosphere. It is just that energy in electrical form is inconvenient to store and cannot be used in an air-jet engine. And in the form of hydrocarbon fuel it is convenient.
      1. 0
        27 October 2021 17: 09
        at a certain stage of the technological process, external energy (electrical) is pumped in,

        This is just the energy from the "perpetum". And everything else is demagoguery around the term "efficiency"
  4. +2
    26 October 2021 19: 04
    The head was pulled out - the tail got stuck. It turns out a fairy tale without end. How much "green" kerosene will be produced, how much energy will be consumed? Efficiency more than one, perpetuum mobile?
    1. 0
      28 October 2021 16: 12
      How much "green" kerosene will be produced, how much energy will be consumed?

      This is how the plant works. Produces a barrel per day, strives for a price of 450 rubles per liter ...
  5. +3
    26 October 2021 20: 22
    You’ll laugh, but the Pentagon (or the State Department, not the point) actually funded a rabbit massage program to determine how massage would affect the well-being of the American military abroad.
    News from the same topic - how to cut the dough on a stupid topic that the Germans were developing in the early 40s.
    1. +3
      26 October 2021 20: 41
      Well, of course, the German "stupid topic", But the Germans provided the entire army and aviation with ONLY synthesized fuel! Except for the fleet, because they could not produce synthetic diesel fuel!
  6. 0
    26 October 2021 20: 24
    Artificial fuel did not help the Germans, let's see how it will help.
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. +1
    27 October 2021 06: 38
    The raw material in the form of carbon dioxide from air and water is converted into synthesis gas with the help of a catalyst and electricity.
    "Well done", oil, gas, coal are almost exhausted ... they took up water and air, but what will remain?
    1. 0
      27 October 2021 11: 43
      No, that's enough for a long time.
      In the bowels of the planet, a natural chemical reactor is operating.
      The question is - where will they take so much energy?
      It is clear that the cost of the final product will be cosmic, but it will pay off under the conditions of c. conflict and fuel shortages. But energy? ... Wind turbines and solar panels are all nonsense (and it will take a lot of time to deploy and build them).
  9. +1
    27 October 2021 15: 26
    Rave. The production of this fuel presupposes the presence of an energy source that surpasses these same millions of tons of fossil fuels in energy (about 7,6 million cubic meters of kerosene per year, and this is without war). Imagine the size of this solar power plant (or the number of nuclear power plants) to achieve this goal and how easy it will be to leave amers without fuel or make airfields unusable due to radiation contamination of the area.
    1. 0
      30 October 2021 15: 47
      It is difficult to prove something to people, instead of physics studying the nonsense of the "green" about alternative energy sources. They are sure that e-energy is taken from the outlet, and efficiency is a dirty word. drinks
      1. -1
        31 October 2021 06: 48
        Quote: Nafanya from the couch
        It is difficult to prove something to people, instead of physics studying the nonsense of the "green" about alternative energy sources. They are sure that e-energy is taken from the outlet, and efficiency is a dirty word.

        So you don't believe in ecological disaster?
        1. 0
          31 October 2021 06: 58
          I, unlike Greta T., studied well at school and institute. Therefore, I know that the name Greenland means "Green Land" since 982 AD.
          Probably joking.
  10. 0
    2 November 2021 03: 15
    Several years ago I read about a pilot plant that synthesized the purest alcohol from the air.
    1. 0
      9 January 2022 06: 54
      For homeless people and other drinkers, this installation as an artifact of divine origin

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"