Pentagon: Lasers are weapons of the future, but this won't always be the case

16

Ultra-shortwave pulsed lasers, emitting a trillion watts in one quadrillion of a second, are today a technology too early for military use. Lasers are weapon the future, but it won't always be that way. Sooner or later, the introduction of laser weapons into the troops in a full-fledged version will take place.

This opinion was expressed by Joe Shepard, vice president of innovation in directional energy of the American company Booz Allen Hamilton, in his article published by Breaking Defense magazine.



There is an old joke in US defense circles that laser weapons are the technology of the future, and will always be so. But today the Pentagon is trying to translate the dream of the possibilities of directed energy into reality. At the same time, according to Shepard, he may be investing money in the wrong direction of research in which he should.

Much of the Pentagon's current research on directed energy weapons concerns CW lasers, which use a relatively low power beam to burn optical sensors or cause other material damage over time. But the military is increasingly interested in ultra-shortwave pulsed lasers (USPLs), very powerful beams fired in a tiny fraction of a second, so to speak, capable of vaporizing a small area of ​​a target's surface or destroying its electronics instantly.

It is vital to maintain the US leadership as the first country to effectively deploy USPL technology on the ground will have a clear military advantage

Shepard says.

In his opinion, the embodiment of this principle in real weapons systems is possible in about 10-15 years.

According to plans announced last year by the Pentagon, work on a powerful continuous wave laser weapon is in full swing. The United States intends to install it on aircraft from 2022 and on ground vehicles from 2023.
  • https://www.lockheedmartin.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    22 October 2021 13: 08
    the first country to effectively apply USPL technology on the ground will have a clear military advantage

    But it won't always be this way
    1. +4
      22 October 2021 13: 15
      "Garin, Garin," he repeated with a heartbreaking reproach. "I gave him the idea of ​​a hyperboloid. I gave him the idea of ​​an Olivine belt ..."
      1. +3
        22 October 2021 15: 30
        Quote: Finches
        "Garin, Garin," he repeated with a heartbreaking reproach. "I gave him the idea of ​​a hyperboloid. I gave him the idea of ​​an Olivine belt ..."

        Alexei Tolstoy had at least a reasonable idea.

        And here is absolute nonsense:
        emitting a trillion watts in one quadrillionth of a second

        As a result, energy is only one thousandth of a Joule. It's not enough even to light a match wassat A flashlight bulb emits the same energy in two thousandths of a second. And a laser from a DVD player in a fifth of a second. And he only needs to burst balloons at a distance of no more than a couple of centimeters.
  2. -1
    22 October 2021 13: 10
    The mirrors are enough to reflect the full power of the laser, though where the beam will go is not predictable.
    1. 0
      22 October 2021 13: 19
      Quote: Karos
      Grabs a mirror to reflect the full power of the laser

      An ordinary mirror may not fit, we are talking not so much about a beam of light as about a short burst of plasma, and these are very high temperatures.
    2. -1
      22 October 2021 13: 31
      Yeah, but add a mirror to the "Warrior" kit and the problem is solved.
    3. +2
      22 October 2021 14: 06
      What mirror are you talking about? Already starting from a miserable megawatt per 1mm2, mirrors do not exist in principle. And we are talking about petawatts wassat By the way, this is another problem of such a weapon - because of its super-luminosity, the beam hits in two diametrically opposite directions, this must be taken into account wassat In the meantime, capacitor banks (and not simple ones, but very tricky ones) will occupy the football field - there will be no weapons. laughing And such experimental installations have been a dime a dozen for a long time. Everyone wants to get thermonuclear fusion not only in the cooperative Itera, but everyone in their own laser laboratory, separately from everyone, so to speak. bully
  3. +2
    22 October 2021 13: 16
    Pentagon: Lasers are weapons of the future, but this won't always be the case
    Does anyone argue with this? Although they supplement that will be used for specific tasks, and not everywhere.
  4. -1
    22 October 2021 13: 22
    Mirrors are the armor of the future, but it will never be
  5. 0
    22 October 2021 13: 26
    The problem of the use of lasers in combat is not a banal increase in the radiation power, this is half the trouble, quite a trouble with the systems of concentration and control of the energy beam. The American laser Boeing was closed essentially due to the "disposable" guidance system.
  6. +1
    22 October 2021 13: 41
    Lasers in the course of scientific research do not in any way pull against the hypersonic missiles of the Russian Federation in metal and the operation of the Russian Armed Forces. This is a shift in focus from the failures of the United States in hyper to secondary prerequisites for a possible hypothetical obtaining in the distant future of laser weapons of acceptable power and characteristics.
  7. +1
    22 October 2021 13: 46
    In space, it is possible and will be
  8. 0
    22 October 2021 16: 15
    ... Lasers are the weapon of the future, but it won't always be so


    It will be different in the future.
  9. -2
    22 October 2021 17: 09
    Quote: Alexander97
    The problem of the use of lasers in combat is not a banal increase in the radiation power, this is half the trouble, quite a trouble with the systems of concentration and control of the energy beam. The American laser Boeing was closed essentially due to the "disposable" guidance system.

    Not at all because of this, but because it is a bulky chemical laser. Oxygen-iodine or whatever it was, as far as the reagent is enough and will emit.
  10. +1
    22 October 2021 19: 20
    Quote: vadimtt
    What mirror are you talking about? Already starting from a miserable megawatt per 1mm2, mirrors do not exist in principle. And we are talking about petawatts wassat By the way, this is another problem of such a weapon - because of its super-luminosity, the beam hits in two diametrically opposite directions, this must be taken into account wassat In the meantime, capacitor banks (and not simple ones, but very tricky ones) will occupy the football field - there will be no weapons. laughing And such experimental installations have been a dime a dozen for a long time. Everyone wants to get thermonuclear fusion not only in the cooperative Itera, but everyone in their own laser laboratory, separately from everyone, so to speak. bully

    As far as I know the theory of a laser, no one can solve the problem with precipitation so far - everything is beautiful in a vacuum.
  11. +1
    22 October 2021 20: 32
    I want a proton blaster! (Not to be confused with a protein bar!) ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"