Russian anti-aircraft systems intercepted the "hypersonic weapons" of the mock enemy

The Ministry of Defense has worked out the fight against hypersonic missiles of a potential enemy. The exercises of air defense units were held in early October in the Western and Eastern military districts.

The Russian military department conducted a series of exercises for air defense regiments to repel massive strikes aviation enemy, as well as cruise and hypersonic missiles. In addition to maneuvers with electronic launches, live firing was carried out at the Ashuluk and Kapustin Yar ranges. As part of practical firing, anti-aircraft systems intercepted hypersonic means of destruction of a simulated enemy, which were ultra-high-speed targets.

Kaka write "News" with reference to military sources, within the framework of the conducted exercises, the emphasis was placed on the fight against hypersonic weapons. At the Ashuluk range, the S-400 anti-aircraft missile regiment of the Leningrad Air Defense Association ZVO was involved, and at the Kapustin Yar range, targets were hit by the S-400 and Pantsir-S1 complexes of an anti-aircraft missile regiment from the troops and forces in northeastern Russia. It is emphasized that the exercises were recognized as successful.

According to military expert Dmitry Kornev, in Russia, several anti-aircraft systems and complexes are capable of intercepting and destroying promising enemy hypersonic ammunition at once. We are talking about complexes of the S-300, S-350, S-400 and S-500 air defense systems. In addition, hypersonic missiles intercept the latest modifications of the Buk air defense missile system, as well as the modernized Pantsir air defense missile system. Currently, new anti-aircraft systems are being developed, for which the interception of hypersonic targets will not present any difficulty.

Comments

[hrych]

This is some kind of mockery against the previous news

[Finches]

Exactly!
"Alain novi, nostra alis! Which means - if one person has built, the other can always make out"

[hrych]

Quote: Finches

the other can always make out

We have a hypersonic missile simulator, Favorit-RM. The 5V55 missiles of the S-300PS anti-aircraft complex were turned into a target. The rocket accelerates to 2000 m / s, i.e. reaches 6 swings. Here we can still apply Bulba's rule ...

[Turbo3000]

No mockery, I explain how hypersound works and why the Pantsir air defense system can easily intercept Zircon and Vanguard.
First about Zircon:
1. Hypersonic missiles reach a horizontal speed of Mach 5 above ~ 18 m, and below they lose speed several times because of the increase in atmospheric pressure - resistance. 
An 8mah engine will lose efficiency below 28m. and shut off as the design of the air intake is not designed for changes in atmospheric pressure.  
2. For reliable accuracy of defeat with a deviation of 10 m, subsonic speed is needed. To hit movable targets, you need a gentle flight profile to get sufficient controllability, vertical dive is used only against stationary targets.
All this makes the hypersonic missiles in the final section even the Carapace's prey. 

The effective range of Zircon, judging by the tests, is 350-450 km, which means that the scramjet engine works and produces 8m only within a radius of up to 300 km, another 150 braking distance. Can Zircon fly 1000km ??? Yes, but due to ironing, without a working motor, with a constant loss of stored energy. And by the point of 500 km it will lose its speed and turn into a supersonic high-altitude target, by the point 990 km the speed will drop to the speed of a bicycle. The American X-51A engine worked more than 300 km, more than 100 rocket stroked to the target with a dive, although in general it could stroke up to 750 km ...
In general, launching Zircon from a ship and a submarine is suicide, as it unmasks the carriers. It is not clear why they do this. Therefore, the US Navy is left with subsonic low-flying missiles, which have a low launch and flight profile, hiding the ship behind the curvature of the earth. 

Vanguard. 1. Is the Vanguard faster than conventional ICBMs? Yes, faster, but the Vanguard is slower than flat trajectory ICBMs like Trident. 2. The main disadvantage of the Vanguard is that it loses its kinetic energy, so in the final phase it will have a speed like a medium-range missile of the SKUD type. And it can be intercepted by conventional air defense.  

If we take the American glider HTV-2, then at a distance of 7500 km (the distance from European Russia to the USA), it lost speed to the speed of a short-range missile in the final section. The DARPA website cites HTV-2 data: the initial speed is 22mach, after two minutes of ironing, the speed faded to 17mach, the progression of the speed loss then decreased, the swing number was not so quickly lost, but every minute the loss of half a swing somewhere. 3. The DARPA website confirms the operation of GPS at a speed of 20mah, also the work of two-way communication at 20mah, as you can see, the plasma does not interfere with the work. 4. If the Vanguard is launched from the Urals, where it stands, to the US Navy base in Hawaii - 12000 km, then the speed of the Vanguard will be like that of Point Y, the kinetic energy for such a distance will be wasted. I quote Academician Solomonov: "Vanguard ... you need to understand that a flying body in the atmosphere loses kinetic energy ... and Solomonov hinted that this is a military information weapon, no one talks about efficiency." 

[hrych]

Everything is simpler, Zircon, flying on hypersound in the stratosphere, dives at the target, passing the troposphere in a few seconds and not having time to melt. Yes, and this is not necessary, undermining the SBS in the upper part of the troposphere, where there is material for creating a shock wave. That's all the wisdom.

[voyaka uh]

The shock wave becomes effective and destructive at an altitude of about 300-400 m.
An explosion in the troposphere, apart from radioactive contamination of the area (where, it is not clear - where the wind is blowing), will not lead to anything.

[hrych]

In short, if you don’t know, you’d better not write. The most effective and with the maximum radius of destruction is an air nuclear explosion. Undermining at an altitude of no more than 10 kilometers, further vacuuming reduces efficiency. An air explosion is the most environmentally friendly, because it does not contaminate the surface material. Even with the air explosion of the Tsar Bomba, in the epicenter of the test site, after a few hours it was safe, the radiation was minimal. The vast majority of ICBM warheads are designed for an air explosion. To you on the website of Gretta Tumberg And we, militarists, on the contrary, are sad that the enemy will receive little radiation from air explosions.

[aszzz888]

grunt (grunt)
Yesterday, 17: 31

+6
In short, you don't know, you'd better not write ... to you on the site of Gretta Tumberg

There is no such thing. On that site there are a lot of people like him. And they will quickly expose it.

[antivirus]

In addition, hypersonic missiles intercept the latest modifications of the Buk air defense missile system, as well as the modernized Pantsir air defense missile system.

- the main thing in these missiles is to stop movement through the Dnieper bridges (and Dnieper) without destroying them. death is not control of space and countries

[voyaka uh]

"you need to understand that a flying body in the atmosphere loses kinetic energy" ///
----
Gliders are especially interesting.
Thank you.

Very informative post.

[Turbo3000]

The vanguard is a window dressing before the signing of START-3, the Americans need to be forced to sign unprofitable agreements, so a bunch of wunderwaves, petrels, Poseidons got out ... and the Kremlin believes that these are trump cards in the negotiations.
One Vanguard has a mass size of 6 warheads + 10 false ones. The speed is low. It is not profitable. But the Americans are shabby rolls, they are not fond of these bikes.

[Orange bigg]

Quote: Turbo3000

The vanguard is a window dressing before the signing of START-3, the Americans need to be forced to sign unprofitable agreements, so a bunch of wunderwaves, petrels, Poseidons got out ... and the Kremlin believes that these are trump cards in the negotiations.
One Vanguard has a mass size of 6 warheads + 10 false ones. The speed is low. It is not profitable. But the Americans are shabby rolls, they are not fond of these bikes.

Vanguard is a planning ICBM warhead that has already been put into service.

[Turbo3000]

Well, adopted by the Vanguard into service and what next? over 30 years in Russia, thousands of warheads have been removed from service ... and the Vanguard will be removed if necessary.

[Orange bigg]

Quote: Turbo3000

Well, adopted by the Vanguard into service and what next? over 30 years in Russia, thousands of warheads have been removed from service ... and the Vanguard will be removed if necessary.

You are trying to pull an owl onto the globe, presenting what you want as possible.

[Turbo3000]

If the START treaty is not extended, Russia will receive 5000 warheads from the warehouses, why is the Vanguard then? You put 16 warheads + 10 false targets on Sarmat, you start up along a flat trajectory to overcome the GBI global missile defense system, and the Americans will deal with 26 targets, instead of one Vanguard.
Yes, Aegis missile defense can intercept, but 16 at the same time is a lot

[hrych]

This is not entirely true. Vanguard is the answer to the Boeing X-37. Which is intended for the first, blinding strike on early warning systems, etc., a high-altitude nuclear explosion to create an EMP, a low-altitude, hypersonic breakthrough (only at the Vanguard), etc. X-37 is on duty in space, very vulnerable, albeit extremely dangerous. Russia has placed the glider in mines and in much larger quantities. The algorithm of actions of the devices is very close. Nobody refuses the RGCH INN, this is our everything and the governor will be replaced by Sarmat. Yars, including mobile, with MIRV, like Bulava. Our TNW has reached a range of more than a thousand kilometers, and even several, has reached hypersonic speeds (previously available only to BB ICBMs), and their SBS even earlier reached the megaton class. Those. our TNW has reached a strategic level. Taking it into account, the Russian Federation possesses a nuclear arsenal more than anyone else combined. TNW is not regulated by treaties and holds the whole of Eurasia at gunpoint because of the central (successful ) the location of Russia. And the strategic nuclear forces are more free from solving the Eurasian problems in the direction of the United States. Poseidon and Petrel are not yet discussed. This is not far off, but the future. Question. Not enough for you?

[Turbo3000]

The X-37 is not a weapon, an aircraft for physical experiments in space. If for years they hadn't boiled at patriotic forums, but had knowledge of English, they would have read what the x-37 is doing in orbit and would not have come up with stories.

[El Chuvachino]

You might think that in the public domain you can read what the X-37 is actually doing in orbit ... a kindergarten. Please do not write more such pseudo-scientific nonsense about the Vanguard without understanding you.

[hrych]

Quote: Turbo3000

for physics experiments in space

Undoubtedly. Like the Vanguard, it was also created for physical experiments in orbit, stratosphere, etc. Poseidon is for physical experiments in the ocean.

Quote: Turbo3000

but had knowledge of English

Do you think you're the only one here, an exceptional polyglot?

[Aag]

Without delving into the technical, physical details, I understand the way Solomonov is - "military information weapon" (With a competent elaboration of the concept of application, it is quite strong!).
But, it seems, here, as with the fight against poverty in the country, - "you can win in a week, you just have to change the method of counting" (quote from yesterday's TV broadcast, "OTR" channel) ... (((

[lucul]

Hypersonic missiles reach a horizontal speed of Mach 5 above ~ 18 m, and below they lose speed several times because of the increase in atmospheric pressure - resistance.

What nonsense, how many times? )))) Zircon flies, and then dives downward, passing through the dense layers of the atmosphere in the shortest time, so the speed in the final section is also prohibitive.

For confident accuracy of defeat with a deviation of 10 m, subsonic speed is needed. To hit movable targets, you need a gentle flight profile to get sufficient controllability, vertical dive is used only against stationary targets.

Nonsense, it was like this before the advent of hypersonic missiles.
The trick is that ours solved the problem of the plasma cocoon, and Zircon does not need to remove it to correct targeting.

Can Zircon fly 1000km ??? Yes, but due to ironing, without a working motor, with a constant loss of stored energy. And by the point of 500 km it will lose its speed and turn into a supersonic high-altitude target, by the point 990 km the speed will drop to the speed of a bicycle

In short - you have stupidity in every paragraph.

[Turbo3000]

- I give you the official information, the speed of the X-51 rocket dropped from Mach 5 to subsonic, the Dagger in the video hit the bunker at a speed of 660 km / s per hour.
Now think about what prohibitive speed of Zircon you write.
- The accuracy of the defeat has nothing to do with plasma, the accuracy of the defeat is due to the fact that the higher the missile speed, the lower the controllability, so the missile speed must be reduced for an accurate hit.
The fact that yours solved the problem of the plasma cocoon you yourself invented, do you know why? because there is no problem of the plasma cocoon, the plasma cocoon starts from 10 swings, Zircon does not fly at such speeds.

[El Chuvachino]

660 km / s per hour.

660 km per second per hour?

[ja-ja-vw]

Quote: hrych

This is some kind of mockery against the previous news

do not despair
autonomous target complex 9K37RMK has a new target missile "Pensne" (9M38RM), which is the 9M38UD SAM, i.e. 9M38M1
the maximum rocket speed is 1200 m / s. (3,5M) to hypersound like to the Moon +
flight range: - 2.5 - 70 km
it is allowed under the nose of the crew
simulator speed: ultra-fast but not hypersonic

From the material of the Ministry of Defense of Russia

 Show / Hide text

https://function.mil.ru/news_page/country/more.htm?id=12072436@egNews

target complex "Adjutant" ... there are completely different targets

Supersonic target missile MA-31 (aircraft carrier) is M3,3

Our "eagles" supplied them to the states

 Show / Hide text

http://www.ktrv.ru/production/voennaya_produktsiya/rakety-misheni/raketa-mishen_ma-31.html

In the period from 1965 to the present, RMs of the "Kunitsa" types (1965-1970) based on the "205" SAM, "Sobol" (1970-1975) were developed, tested and introduced into serial production and operation. .) and "Belka" (1975-1988) based on SAM "207", "Zvezda" (1988-1993) based on SAM "217M" and the RM family "Strizh" (since 1993. to the present) on the basis of SAM "5Ya25M" and "5Ya24".

More and nothing.
Therefore

Quote: author

As Izvestia writes with reference to military sources, within the framework of the exercises, an emphasis was placed on the struggle with hypersonic means lesions.

but "guys "Izvestia" and do not know "

[hrych]

MA-31 or our "cut-off" Kh-31s have long been over. The last launch was at the beginning of the century. And the Russian Federation stopped supplying them. There is no trace of hypersound. One and a half swing target, when the original, i.e. The Kh-31 accelerated to three. Not the point. This is in the distant past.

Quote: ja-ja-vw

9K37RMK has a new target missile "Pensne" (9M38RM), which is the 9M38UD SAM, i.e. 9M38M1
the maximum rocket speed is 1200 m / s. (3,5M) to hypersound like to the Moon +

You did not understand. 1200 m / s is the speed of the object being hit by the 9M38 missile The rocket itself almost reaches hypersound. Its speed is about 1600 m / s, or almost Mach 5 (4,8). We have a hypersonic missile simulator, Favorit-RM. The 5V55 missiles of the S-300PS anti-aircraft complex were turned into a target. The rocket accelerates to 2000 m / s, i.e. reaches 6 swings.

[ja-ja-vw]

Quote: hrych

And the Russian Federation stopped supplying them.

wrote the same

Quote: ja-ja-vw

Their our "eagles" delivered to states

Quote: hrych

There is no hypersound there.

who claimed otherwise?

Quote: ja-ja-vw

this is M3,3

everything seems to be in black and white and in Russian!

Quote: hrych

You did not understand. 1200 m / s - this is the speed of the object struck by the 9M38 rocket The rocket itself almost reaches hypersound. Its speed is about 1600 m / s, or almost Mach 5 (4,8).

I understood everything. you have something with reading / understanding
1.the speed of the target is 2880 km / h =800m / s

Target flight speed, km / h

up to 1200 m / s this is only for the 9K37M1-2 "Buk-M1-2" air defense missile system, and she has the 9M317 missile defense system, I also "broadcast" about the 9M38M1 and it is for the AMK
2.I'm about

Quote: ja-ja-vw

that there is a 9M38UD SAM, i.e. 9M38M1

Again, in TTX zur in black and white for 9M38 it is written 1000m / s, for 9M38M1 it is not written, but 1200m / s, if you really want to, but on the knee for 9M317 missiles
F = m * a; a = V / t
F9М317/ F(9М38)=24G*715 кг/19G*685кг
so
V9М317/V9М38=1,32
Therefore, EVEN SAM 9M317 V WILL NOT MORE = 1,32 * 1000M / S = 1320 M / S = 3,9M
What kind

Quote: hrych

Ama rocket almost reaches hypersound.

christen

Quote: hrych

We have a hypersonic missile simulator, Favorit-RM. 5V55 missiles were turned into a target

To simulate weapons created intellectual target "Favorit-RM".

/ before the chubatrade was nano, now the irons are intelligent and hypersonic

5B55

Rocket engine - solid propellant

Length - 7 m
Case diameter - 45 cm
Wingspan - approx. 1 m
Weight - 1500 kg
Mass of warhead - 150 kg

Range:
- 90 km (at an altitude of 2000-30000 m)
- 25 km (at an altitude of 10-25 m)
- up to 120 km (air defense missile system "Fort" according to indirect data)
Damage height:
- minimal - 10-25 m
- maximum - 30000 m
Rocket speed - 1500 m / s
Aircraft-class target speed - up to 4200 km / h
Time interval between starts - 3 s

1500m / s = 4,4M = not hypersound

maybe 5V55K? there is still "up to 2000m / s, as it were" to "hypersound?
or more reliable 48N6M there exactly 2100 m / s and exactly hypersound.
Voparos, who will allow these products worth millions of dollars to be used as targets?

[hrych]

Quote: ja-ja-vw

maybe 5V55K? there is still "up to 2000m / s, as it were" to "hypersound?

No "before" up to 2000 m / s, this is up to 6 swings, and hypersound starts from 5 swings.

Quote: ja-ja-vw

Voparos, who will allow these products worth millions of dollars to be used as targets?

The most expensive one is a GOS with an inertial, radio command control and an airborne radar. Instead of the standard electronics, they install on the target rocket - something of the level of a calculator. A rocket becomes a little more expensive than an uncontrollable one .. This is already a penny. But interceptor missiles are also expensive, but you need to train, you need to work out algorithms, make adjustments during modernization, etc.

[ja-ja-vw]

Quote: hrych

No "to" 2000 m / s is 6 swings,

before, before. do not worry. I know where hypersonic starts and even why with "5"
Yes, and realize where and when (echelon) it is gaining "before".
Launch range. And fucking understand that this is not training to "intercept" hypersound

Quote: hrych

The most expensive is a seeker with an inertial, radio command control and an airborne radar

she already has a radio command, you see, you didn’t shoot at targets.
I think the solid propellant charge will be more expensive.
They do not make, but take those from which the term has expired, which are at the stage of "phrasing" and are removed from incubation.
So think about "what is most expensive"

Quote: hrych

installed instead of standard electronics - something like a calculator.

propagandists claim that artificial intelligence is there

In certain modes, the missile is capable of responding to threats in real time and evading attacks. After it is irradiated with radars, a system is triggered, which gives data on the type of air defense system preparing to strike. An analysis is carried out in automatic mode which means of destruction can be used. Reacting to the situation, the missile makes an anti-aircraft maneuver. At the end of the flight, the rocket soars into the sky for several kilometers and falls down. Which makes it a difficult target for air defense systems.

no figasse "calculator level"

The warhead is freed from explosives, and in its place additional electronic equipment is installed, the control unit is also reprogrammed

to write

After modifications, the target is capable of a short-term hypersonic speed of over 7 thousand km / h

7000 km / h = 1944 m / s so that the solid "to"

[hrych]

And who's worried? The charge of the TTRD does not cost anything, he himself noted that it is overdue and must be disposed of. And the cost of a new one is low. Who is arguing with radio command control? It is sometimes useful to target.

[tralflot1832]

So we have hypersonic target missiles? Nothing has been heard about them.

[Fregate]

The boar target rocket accelerates up to 2800 m / s, and this has long been known. I just don't know if he can maneuver at the same time. If not, then there is nothing supernatural in such interceptions.

[Mole13]

If only by changing the angle of launch of the "Boar", then it is possible to change the trajectory of the target, as a result of which to simulate various types of ballistic targets. But this is not exactly what is included in the concept of "maneuvering".

[sleeve]

2800? I have not heard this. It’s like 4M and that’s all ... And then there’s 9 ... No, it would not be bad to have such a bear. Moreover, within the framework of the fact that there is not only a hypersword, but also a hypershield)

[voyaka uh]

Here's a ballistic target missile

[tralflot1832]

The speed is not the same, in the final section only 1300 m / s

[ja-ja-vw]

Quote: voyaka uh

Here's a ballistic target missile

what is this "such"? Speed?
What does a "ballistic target missile" have to do with "hypersonic imitators of enemy weapons"?
96М6М

Maximum speed, m / s 830-1300

However, despite its high flight performance, the 96M6M target missile cannot fully simulate modern and advanced missile systems. Therefore, the development of new targets becomes an important task, capable of providing high speeds from
2000 to 3000 m / s when passing the zone of combat use of fire weapons

[Nikolaevich I]

Quote: tralflot1832

So we have hypersonic target missiles?

Of the new ones launched into production, this will be the Favorit-RM complex ... The target was created on the basis of 5V55 missiles ... in flight it briefly reaches hypersonic speed ... There was once a message that a hypersonic target was being developed by NPO Molniya "The latest type" "CLOVES"! ... But to what extent this development is ready, I do not know ...

[WIKI]

Quote: tralflot1832

How do we have hypersonic target missiles?

https://iz.ru/835198/aleksei-ramm-aleksei-kozachenko/odnim-makhom-zenitchikov-nauchat-sbivat-giperzvukovye-tceli

[Turbo3000]

What are you guys writing about? What hypersonic target missiles?)))))))))
Interception occurs at the terminal stage of flight, when the hypersonic missile becomes a conventional warhead. You don't need any hypersonic targets to mimic Zircon.
It is unrealistic to intercept a hypersonic missile in the middle section when it has Mach 8, a new satellite tracking system for hypersonic targets and target designation in real time is needed, only after that a missile defense missile with a miniature glider inside can be created.

[Orange bigg]

... What are you guys writing about? What hypersonic target missiles?)))))))))
Interception occurs at the terminal stage of flight, when the hypersonic missile becomes a conventional warhead. You don't need any hypersonic targets to mimic Zircon.

Stop writing crazy posts. Zircon does not become a conventional warhead; it does not fly on a ballistic trajectory. It is a maneuvering hypersonic cruise missile, not an IRBM.

[Turbo3000]

You mean, the Zircon hypersonic engine works in the dense layers of the atmosphere? No, it turns off, just like the Kh-51A hypersonic missile and falls like a warhead.

[Orange bigg]

.it is disabled, just like the Kh-51A hypersonic missile and falls like a warhead.

Did you personally check it? And why, then, the Russian air-based anti-ship missile system X-51, which is close in speed to the X-32A, does not turn off and does not fall at a similar speed, and even passed state tests and was adopted by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation?

[Turbo3000]

Yes, I did. There is a flight schedule for the X-51A on the Internet, where it is written how long the engine worked and what speed. You have been drinking for years on patriotic forums, so you don’t understand anything.
The X-32 has a multi-mode liquid-propellant engine, which is completely different from the Zircon and X-51A engines. Therefore, it is not even necessary to compare.
Multi-mode rocket engines do not work for a long time, known engines worked for up to one and a half minutes.
One should not think that the Kh-32 missile maintains high speed and altitude over long distances. It is displayed, according to the X-32 ballistic trajectory, and in the final section, a liquid-propellant engine is working, in order to give controllability to such a heavy rocket.

[Orange bigg]

Well, what don't you like? The speed of the X-32 is up to 5400 km / h.

.Tactical and technical data of the KR X-32 Guidance system: ARGSN and autocorrelation GISU. Engine: 2-chamber rocket engine, nuclear warhead TK-56. Range up to 1000 km. Speed ​​up to 5400 km / h. Flight altitude up to 40000 m / dive to the target. Launch altitude up to 13000 m. Starting weight 5780 kg. Length 11,65 m. Hull diameter 0,92 m. Wingspan 3,0 m. Wing area 4,48 sq. M.

Content source: https://naukatehnika.com/kryilataya-raketa-x-32.html
naukatehnika.com

What is the difference between the X-32 and its predecessor and what is known about it from open sources? The X-32 is almost completely identical in appearance to the X-22, with a few exceptions. However, the "insides" of the missiles are very different. The X-32 uses a significantly improved starting and sustainer engine. The starting engine now allows you to "lift" the rocket after launch to an altitude of about 40 (!) Kilometers. At this altitude, the air density is about the same as the density of the Martian atmosphere and the rocket practically does not encounter air resistance, which makes it possible to dramatically increase both the speed and range of flight. Apparently, it was possible to increase the thrust of the main engine. Reportedly, the speed of the X-32 has increased to 5400 km / h - more than 5M! The range of application, according to various estimates, is from 600 to 1000 kilometers. But even with a range of 600 kilometers, this is more than enough to strike a potential enemy's AUG, being beyond the reach of not only the most "long-range" shipborne air defense systems, but also carrier-based fighters. At the same time, most of the X-32's flight takes place at an altitude unattainable for any anti-aircraft missiles.



A separate problem is to provide target designation for Kh-32 missiles when fired at long range. With a "working" flight altitude of the Tu-22M3 of about 10 kilometers, the radio horizon for an onboard search radar will be about 360 kilometers. At the same time, for firing at the maximum flight range, sufficiently accurate target designation is required, which can only be obtained from other means. However, the capabilities of modern control and data exchange systems make it possible to significantly simplify the process of receiving and transmitting target designation to the strike group. In addition, the altitude of the Kh-32 provides a gigantic radio horizon for its seeker, which is over 700 kilometers, which exceeds the detection range of the missile's seeker targets. Thus, the Kh-32 can successfully find a target even with extremely "rough" target designation. In addition, as reported, the GOS X-32 has the ability to correct the trajectory in flight, in case of update by the carrier aircraft or some other "source" of target data.

https://dfnc.ru/c106-technika/chto-predstavlyaet-soboj-novaya-protivokorabelnaya-krylataya-raketa-h-32/


The speed of HAWC is about 6200 km / h.

.

“The United States has tested hypersonic air-jet weapons capable of five times the speed of sound in the first successful test of this class of weapon since 2013,” the Pentagon said on Monday. Free flight tests of the hypersonic air weapon concept (HAWC) took place last week, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) said in a statement. Hypersonic weapons travel in the upper atmosphere at more than five times the speed of sound, or about 6200 kilometers per hour, "Reuters news agency reported.

The speed indicator was borderline to the hypersonic speed. That is, it is also a "near-hypersonic" rocket, also in the final flight phase it accelerates to near-hypersonic speed, like the Kh-32.

For the first time since the development of hypersonic weapons, the American military managed to accelerate the missile to 5 speeds of sound. This indicates that the United States, as part of the tests, were successfully able to approach the creation of hypersonic weapons. Nevertheless, apparently, the speed indicator was borderline, in addition, sources report that at the final stage of testing, control over the missile was lost and it was never able to hit the conditional target.


But the X-32 was brought to mind and put into service, and HAWC still has problems with this. Ferstein?

[Turbo3000]

The speed of the X-32 does not matter, it flies along a ballistic trajectory like the American X-15 with LPRE in the 60s.
HAWC scramjet rocket with horizontal flight, why are you comparing?

[Orange bigg]

One should not think that the Kh-32 missile maintains high speed and altitude over long distances. It is displayed, according to the X-32 ballistic trajectory, and in the final section, a liquid-propellant engine is working, in order to give controllability to such a heavy rocket.

What are the differences in the principles of application? The Kh-32 also does not fly on a ballistic trajectory, it is also a cruise missile like the Kh-51A.

The GLA X-51 A has a length of 7,62 m. Its power plant is a hydrocarbon scramjet engine. The vehicle will be launched from a Boeing B-52H carrier aircraft at an altitude of 15200 m at a speed corresponding to the number at M = 0,8. After the reset, the solid propellant booster turns on. Having reached a speed corresponding to the number M = 1 - 8300 at an altitude of 4,6 m, the apparatus turns over on its "back". At this moment, the booster unit is fired back and the scramjet engine is turned on. In the future, the GLA gains an altitude of about 4,8 m and makes a flight over a distance of about 30000 km.

http://www.airwar.ru/enc/xplane/x51.html

Various sources mention that the Kh-32 will be able to reach speeds of up to 5000-5400 km / h and climb to heights of the order of 40 km. The flight range will reach 1000 km.

To improve the efficiency of application, it is possible to apply new methods of guidance and the corresponding flight path. After uncoupling from a carrier aircraft at altitudes from 1 to 13 km, the rocket will have to turn on the engine and reach an altitude of 40 km. Horizontal flight at maximum altitude must continue until the target reaches the area, after which the rocket will have to complete guidance to the specified object, going into a dive.

https://topwar.ru/99721-zavershayutsya-ispytaniya-krylatoy-rakety-h-32.html

[ja-ja-vw]

Quote: tralflot1832

So we have hypersonic target missiles? Nothing has been heard about them.

no
"Flight" (M-143, VR-3VM), E-95 (almost FAU-1), "Tribute" (almost tired harpoon from OKB "Sokol"), "Saman" ("Osa-AK" and "Osa- AKM ")," Tit "(5Ya23 and 20DSU)," Strizh "(5Ya25 and 5Ya24)," Pishchal "(5V27)," Armavir "(5Ya23)

Quote: Fregate

Target rocket "Wild boar" up to 2800 m / s

no
96M6M "Kaban" EPR 96M6M is 0,015–1 sq. M.
the target rocket was developed on the basis of the M-100B meteorological rocket

By speed and altitude characteristics, by the value of effective
dispersion area, it is able to simulate a high-speed rocket, moving along a ballistic trajectory.

The missile flies along a ballistic trajectory with an elevation of 31-50 km and a range of 91-107 km with a maximum speed of 1300 m / s at the end of the active section, total flight time 180–220 s

============= \
Kakban for practicing interception of OTR type MGM-52

[valera75]

Currently, new anti-aircraft systems are being developed, for which the interception of hypersonic targets will not present any difficulty.

in the US they cannot launch a rocket on test trials, and we have such news that for the s will be like a sickle in the ya * s. )))

[Jacket in stock]

development of new anti-aircraft systems is underway, for which the interception of hypersonic targets will not present any difficulty.

Keyword missing - non-maneuvering target.

And so, warheads of ICBMs have long been able to intercept.

[Yuri V.A]

A similar interception of a moderately maneuvering target Favorit-RM was spotted back in 19

[sleeve]

Here, exceptionally positive feelings are born. Yes, we can. And we are going to do it en masse. The S400 regiment will give 108 launches and, therefore, you can count on 54 interceptions. Already somehow it becomes easier to live.

[Roman 57 rus]

I don’t know why you minuses, I corrected it as best I could. According to the declared characteristics, for example, the C 400 can intercept targets flying 4,5 km / s for a long time. But maneuvering targets is the question.

[Aliyev Ilham]

No offense, but how do Russian air defense systems intercept "hypersonic" targets, if TOR-M2, Pole 21, Repellent, are not able to detect targets flying at turtle speed?
Again, no offense to the question.
We ourselves use the same air defense systems, that's why we are interested.

[Aliyev Ilham]

Well, in fact there is nothing to answer, only we can put a minus.
Clearly means.

[ultra]

So you write nonsense, here are the cons

[zwlad]

if TOR-M2, Field 21, Repellent, is unable to detect targets flying at turtle speed?

Are there specific examples?

[Jacket in stock]

Quote: Aliyev Ilham

How do Russian air defense systems intercept "hypersonic" targets if TOR-M2, Pole 21, Repellent are not able to detect targets flying at a turtle's speed?

How long have the Repellent and the Field become the SAM?

And if on the topic, then the issue of detection is not in speed, but in the size of the target. More precisely, in its reflectivity, measured in square meters of EPR.
The smaller the target, the less distance it will become visible to the radar.
Well a plus point are optical / IR detectors. A high-speed target heats up in the air and in the IR range glows like a searchlight in the dark. And a small electric "bird" almost does not emit heat.
So the task of finding a small slow-moving drone in the sky is perhaps even more difficult than a fast huge rocket.

[KCA]

Do you think that the drones shot down by the Torahs in Syria fly at supersonic speed?

[Jacket in stock]

Quote: KCA

Do you think that the drones shot down by the Torahs in Syria fly at supersonic speed?

No, they fly the way they can. But our Torahs also know how to knock them down. When they are operated by competent operators.

[Aliyev Ilham]

Quote: KCA

Do you think that the drones shot down by the Torahs in Syria fly at supersonic speed?

Shot down by UAVs and an SU-25 attack aircraft - the TOR-M2KM complex.

[Jacket in stock]

Quote: Aliyev Ilham

Shot down by UAVs and an SU-25 attack aircraft - the TOR-M2KM complex.

And you did not listen to such a proverb - "one in the field is not a warrior"?
If used incorrectly, even a magic wand will not save you.

[sleeve]

Where does this information come from? Maybe you had it written differently: we cannot, while working on this technique, detect low-speed targets? Then everyone will understand.

[JD1979]

Quote: Aliyev Ilham

No offense, but how do Russian air defense systems intercept "hypersonic" targets, if TOR-M2, Pole 21, Repellent, are not able to detect targets flying at turtle speed?

Intercepted as before. This is laid down in them according to the TTZ. It's just that before no one masturbated to hypersound and was not mentioned on every corner. All BB ICBMs, RMSD (which cut) are hypersonic targets and they had to be able to shoot them down. It's just that now other missiles have been added to them that are not ballistic, but themselves or their BBs gaining the appropriate speed. And since their flight profile is again mainly high-altitude, it is likely that the complexes that originally had missiles in their BC for intercepting ballistic missiles and the corresponding guidance equipment, quite intercept hypersonic targets.
Well, in your question, you mixed everything ... TOR was not originally intended to intercept such targets at all. Pole-21 and Repellent ... EW has a different task altogether ... they do not detect missiles, do not issue a control center to them and do not shoot down, but they can interfere with the guidance and control systems.

[Orange bigg]

Quote: Aliyev Ilham

No offense, but how do Russian air defense systems intercept "hypersonic" targets, if TOR-M2, Pole 21, Repellent, are not able to detect targets flying at turtle speed?
Again, no offense to the question.
We ourselves use the same air defense systems, that's why we are interested.

How, then, did the Tor-M2 intercept home-made drones, and how, then, is Delilah's missile defense system constantly intercepted during strikes on Syria, if we have blind air defense?
Not to mention the interception of more than a hundred CR Tomahawk, Scalp in April 2018?

Briefing at the link below.
https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/4126052.html

.According to a source in the SAR, the radar stations of the Tor-M2 complexes are continuously conducting reconnaissance of the airspace in their area of ​​responsibility. The detected objects are classified, and those that pose a threat are destroyed by anti-aircraft missiles.

Over the past three months, the Tor-M2 complexes have detected over 50 air targets. Slightly less than half of them were classified as posing a threat to protected objects and were fired upon. 24 air attack weapons were shot down.

In total, the effectiveness of the combat use of the Tor-M2 air defense system and the anti-aircraft missiles used by the complex was 75% (taking into account the ammunition consumption - due to the peculiarities of the combat use of missiles, often for guaranteed destruction of the most dangerous targets, they are fired at by two missiles at once).

For comparison: the Pantsir air defense missile system used for a long time in the conflict area showed an efficiency of 19%. In turn, experts believe, the Tor-M2 air defense system has confirmed its superiority in battle. Previously, this superiority was demonstrated during comparative shooting.

The effectiveness of the combat work of the Tor-M2 air defense system against very difficult targets - small-sized and inconspicuous, at night, in difficult climatic conditions - again proves that these combat vehicles are unmatched in the class of short-range air defense systems.

https://www.gosnews.ru/news/armiya/za_tri_mesyatsa_kompleksami_tor_m2_v_sirii_bylo_sbito_24_letatelnykh_apparata_protivnika

Photos of downed drones on the link below.

A bit of insider information regarding the operation of Russian anti-aircraft missile systems on alert in Syrian Latakia - at the Russian base "Khmeimim".

Until April 2018, the Russian military used the Pantsir-S1 systems as short-range air defense systems covering the base (the powerful Rostec lobby stood behind the deliveries of these complexes to Syria). However, in a real combat situation, "Pantsir" does not justify the hopes placed on it. And this is evidenced by the air defense officers themselves, who are on alert in Latakia.
In Syria, it turned out that the "Pantsir" practically "does not see" low-speed and small-sized targets, which include military UAVs.

At the same time, the complex regularly recorded false targets - large birds flying around the base, which confused the operators.

In April, by the decision of the Ministry of Defense, Izhevsk (IEMZ Kupol plant) Tor-M2U complexes were transported to Syria.
And it quickly became clear that the terrorist drones literally “spud” the base - moreover, in the first weeks of the “monitoring” of the sky with the Tor-M2U complexes, the information about the presence of small targets was not perceived from its radars - you never know, suddenly the Torah , like the “Shell”, reacts to local birds?
Everything changed after July 1-7, when several massive raids were carried out from the Idlip province during the week. On July 1, the first UAV raid was carried out, and three devices from the UAV group managed to fly up to the territory of the Russian base and drop 9 improvised explosive devices. Immediately after the start of the attack, the Tor-M2U crew detected targets and hit 4 UAVs with 5 anti-aircraft missiles at altitudes of 2,5-3 km.

In turn, 3 more drones were shot down by the Pantsir-S1 air defense missile system, however, they spent as many as 13 (!) Missiles on this.
(Photo: shot down improvised drones of terrorists in Syria, carrying artisanal explosive devices)
Starting from July 1, within a week, the Tor-M2U complexes were able to eliminate 7 enemy unmanned aerial vehicles, spending 9 missiles on it. In turn, "Pantsir-C1" during this period did not shoot down a single UAV of terrorists. During the second half of July, the Torah destroyed 7 UAVs, spending 9 missiles on it.

During the month of August, Izhevsk vehicles discovered and shot down 8 more drones, spending only 9 missiles.
In total, from April to October 2018, the Tor-M2U complexes in Syria detected 80 air targets, shooting down more than half of them and working out, according to the Hamburg score, with an efficiency of 80 percent.

In turn, the effectiveness of the Pantsir-S1 air defense missile system for the same period was only 19 percent.

https://diana-mihailova.livejournal.com/2897356.html

... The installations intercepted 12 Delilah missiles in Syria.
Military sources in Syria reported on the interception of 12 Israeli Delilah stealth missiles.

The incident occurred during the attack on Damascus airport and the city of Al-Ghizlaniyah in February 2021.

It is reported that the Israeli Air Force F-16 fighters fired 12 Delilah cruise missiles, intended for air defense systems. However, the Buk-M2E launchers deployed in the area brilliantly coped with repelling the IDF strike, repelling the strike of all missiles.

https://www.topnews.ru/news_id_359155.html

What is the connection between the air defense systems designed to intercept hypersonic missiles, the S-500, S-400, S-300V4 IRBMs and the Tor-M2 short-range air defense system? Absolutely different tasks are solved by the complexes you are comparing and, accordingly, radars and missiles that differ in their capabilities.

[barclay]

... as well as the modernized Pantsir air defense missile system
Blimey...
Or maybe the "Verba" with the "Arrow" also knows how to cope with hypersound?
Probably everything depends on the natural reaction of the fighter ...

[Bez 310]

Quote: barclay

Probably everything depends on the natural reaction of the fighter ...

It all depends on the natural reaction of the journalist and the "expert".

[barclay]

Here I am about the same. Balabol - do not roll bags ...

[sleeve]

A low-flying one can be knocked down with a thrown boot ...

[Cananecat]

Quote: barclay

Probably everything depends on the natural reaction of the fighter ...

As they wrote recently, at the final army games, only one Russian fighter was successfully intercepted from MANPADS.

[Ross xnumx]

Currently, new anti-aircraft systems are being developed, for which the interception of hypersonic targets will not present any difficulty.

Well. Otherwise, we cannot, how will we answer, where are we going against Japanese fishermen without VNEU ...
Try it, take us for a ruble for twenty ...

[Jacket in stock]

Quote: ROSS 42

Otherwise, we cannot, how will we answer, where are we going against Japanese fishermen without VNEU ...

Seriously, how will hypersound help our submariners?

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: Jacket in stock

Seriously, how will hypersound help our submariners?

Your questions are perplexing. Hypersound will help missiles that will be launched from a submarine ... But in fact, the phrase is a collective image.

[Jacket in stock]

Quote: ROSS 42

This is a collective image.

Yes, of course, in the elderberry garden, in Kiev, there is an uncle.
But seriously, to be ahead of the rest of the world everywhere and immediately does not work for us.

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: Jacket in stock

But seriously, to be ahead of the rest of the world everywhere and immediately does not work for us.

And it is not at all necessary to be ahead of the whole planet. This is only in the proverb: "Whoever got up first, that and the slippers", but in life: "Whoever became the first, that and the bumps."

[askort154]

Inevitably, Putin's words come to mind. We have gone ahead in the creation of hypersonic weapons for several years.
And when they do, we will already have the means to destroy them.

[Mole13]

Quote: askort154

And when they do, we will already have the means to destroy them.

There is already - S-500. I cannot touch on the details of this conclusion here, but take my word for it.

[askort154]

Mole13 ....There is already - S-500. I cannot touch on the details of this conclusion here, but take my word for it.

I believe! Putin voiced Avangard at his 14th Address to the Federal Assembly, and on December 27, 2019, the first Avangard regiment took up combat duty. And recently he took up combat duty and the S-500.
The creator of Vanguard, Herbert Efremov, was awarded the Order of St. Andrew the First-Called.
So today Russia already has both hyperweapons and means of striking it.

[Fungus]

Not bad, not bad

[Cowbra]

Kaka write "Izvestia"

Izvestia - yellowness

[APASUS]

Is it possible or not to intercept hypersonic missiles? It would be necessary to clarify the author, otherwise the vinaigrette turned out. American is possible, but ours are not?

[rocket757]

You can intercept / destroy everything if there are means of countering the corresponding performance characteristics.
However, the planes were shot down with rifles too !!! But this is an exception to the rule, although this has happened more than once, twice, a little more.

[Turbo3000]

It is impossible to intercept hypersonic missiles only in the middle marching segment when they have 5 max, in the final phase, hypersonic missiles turn into gliding warheads that enter dense layers and lose speed at times, therefore, intercepting a Zircon is no different from intercepting a high-altitude warhead of a ballistic missile

[Orange bigg]

Quote: Turbo3000

It is impossible to intercept hypersonic missiles only in the middle marching segment when they have 5 max, in the final phase, hypersonic missiles turn into gliding warheads that enter dense layers and lose speed at times, therefore, intercepting a Zircon is no different from intercepting a high-altitude warhead of a ballistic missile

The means, created back in the 1970s and 80s, still easily overcome missile defense systems, primarily because of their high speed. Intercepting the Zircon is different as the Zircon is not a ballistic missile, but a maneuvering hypersonic cruise missile. And it is more difficult to intercept, since its flight path is unpredictable, because it does not follow a ballistic arc, which can be calculated when intercepting.

Then the most crucial time for ICBMs comes - it is necessary to slip through the atmospheric section over the deployment area as quickly as possible. It is there that strong heat and wind gusts of up to several kilometers per second await her, so the active phase of the ICBM flight lasts only a few minutes.

For Minuteman-III, the first stage runs for exactly one minute. During this time, the rocket rises to a height of 30 kilometers, moving not vertically, but at an angle to the ground. The second stage, also in a minute of operation, throws the rocket at 70-90 kilometers - everything here strongly depends on the distance to the target. Since it is no longer possible to turn off the solid propellant engine, it is necessary to adjust the range of the steep trajectory: if you need further, we take off higher. When starting at a minimum distance, the third stage can not be launched at all, immediately proceeding to scatter gifts. In our case (in the video below), it worked, completing the three-minute work of the rocket itself.


By that time, the payload is already in space and is moving almost at the first cosmic speed - the longest-range ICBMs accelerate to 7 km / s, or even more. It is not surprising that, with minimal modifications, heavy ICBMs, such as the domestic R-36M / M2 or the American LGM-118 Peacekeeper, have been successfully used as light launch vehicles.

Then the fun begins. The so-called "bus" comes into play - a platform / stage for breeding warheads. He alternately drops the warheads, directing them on the right path. This is a real technical miracle - the "bus" does everything so smoothly that small cones without control systems, flying over the seas and continents half of the globe, fit into a radius of only a few hundred meters! Such accuracy is provided by an ultra-precise and insanely expensive inertial navigation system. Satellite systems cannot be relied upon, although they are also used as an aid. And at this stage there are no longer any signals of self-destruction - the risk is too great that the enemy will be able to imitate them.



Together with warheads, the "bus" also throws false targets at enemy missile defense systems. Since the capabilities of the platform are limited both in time and in the amount of fuel, blocks from one missile can hit targets in only one region. According to rumors, ours recently tested a new modification of Yars with several "buses" at once, individual for each unit - and this already removes the restriction.

The block is hiding among many false targets, its place in the battle formation is unknown and is randomly selected by a rocket. The number of decoys can exceed a hundred. In addition, a whole scattering of means of creating radar interference is scattered - both passive (the notorious clouds of chopped foil) and active, creating additional "noise" for the enemy's radars. It is interesting that the means created back in the 1970s and 80s still easily overcome missile defense systems.



Well, then, after a relatively quiet phase of the journey, the warhead enters the atmosphere and rushes to the target. The entire flight takes about half an hour at an intercontinental range. Depending on the type of target, a detonation is possible either at a given height (optimal for hitting a city), or on the surface. Some warheads with sufficient strength can even hit underground targets, while others, before entering the atmosphere, are able to assess their deviation from the ideal trajectory and adjust the height of the detonation. Blocks in service do not maneuver on their own, but their appearance is a matter of the near future.

Details on warhead.su:
https://warhead.su/2017/12/05/absolyutnoe-oruzhie-kak-bystro-do-vas-doletit-ballisticheskaya-raketa

... According to Izvestia's sources, previously only individual units and components of the product were tested. In particular, launches were made to the maximum range without the use of control and guidance systems. Throw tests and so-called burns were also carried out - separate tests of the operation of the product's engines. Now "Zircon" has fully completed its flight program. In particular, according to Izvestia, the rocket for the first time used an unparalleled control system and a homing head. The latter gives the product the highest accuracy with which it can hit even miniature targets.

According to the sources, during this test launch, the rocket performed the most difficult maneuvers on the way to the target. This makes the trajectory of its flight unpredictable, and the ammunition itself is invulnerable to interception.

https://iz.ru/1070790/dmitrii-kornev-roman-kretcul/so-skorostiu-giperzvuka-tcirkon-vpervye-proshel-kompleksnye-ispytaniia

[Turbo3000]

Why are you littering the forum with such long texts? It is impossible because of you to read anything normally, what kind of person are you?
I wrote that Zircon is losing speed to ballistic, meaning short-range missiles, not ICBMs, why are you writing me tons of letters about ICBMs ???
The scramjet engine does not work in dense layers, so there will be no intense Zircon maneuvering in the final phase, it is just a warhead, it can slightly change its trajectory, but without intense displacement.

[Orange bigg]

This is only your guess. It is not so simple.

The main task of the "Zircon" is not to break through such a guard, but to make sure that the "security forces" of the aircraft carrier would not be able to use weapons at all. Here, not only the laws of physics come into play, but also the knowledge of the enemy's combat systems - the speed of the Zircon in the final section of the flight exceeds 10 thousand kilometers per hour. Modern combat systems on US Navy ships are able to intercept targets flying at a speed of 3 thousand kilometers per hour. And this only applies to missiles capable of minimal deviations from the course during flight.

Zircon maneuvers at high angles and at high speeds, so modern electronics simply cannot keep track of the rocket in such modes. At some point, the protection system "collapses" into failure and the missile penetrates the ship's hull, undermining the 450-kilogram warhead between the decks. Further - the struggle for the survivability of an aircraft carrier (or destroyer), and there can be no talk of military operations.

... The ability of Russian hypersonic missiles to cover vast distances in a short time is a secret that the intelligence of almost every foreign country hunts for. In the same way, the US and NATO hunted for the secrets of Soviet supersonic missiles during the Cold War - some of the secrets were even stolen, but they still could not create their own supersonic missiles capable of hitting far and fast abroad.

In this sense, Zircon continues the unique traditions of Soviet developments, but significantly surpasses everything that was developed and produced in previous years. The main advantage of the rocket was not only materials and a unique engine, but also flight characteristics - the average time for the destruction of an enemy ship "Zircon", according to rumors, is no more than one minute when launched from a distance of 800-900 kilometers.

https://life.ru/p/1440570

[Turbo3000]

99% of articles on the topic of hypersound in Runet are illiterate jingoistic stories of journalists.
I was especially pleased with the speed on the final section of 10000 km / hour))))))
Such a speed is possible only on the moon where there is zero atm pressure and there is no atm resistance, therefore there are so many craters on the moon, there meteorites hit the surface in hypersound, and on the ground, a falling object loses its accumulated speed when entering dense layers ...
therefore hypersonic speed occurs only in the stratosphere

[Orange bigg]

You have gaps in your knowledge of physics. 10 km / h is a little less than Mach 000, and Mach 9 is about 1 km / h or 1200 m / s. Hypersound starts at Mach 0,33, that is, from 5 km / h or 6000 m /with. The same Dagger flies at Mach 1.65, that is, 10 km / h, but at the same time it is launched not on the Moon, but on Earth, oddly enough. You only show your ignorance by making such statements.

The main targets of the hypersonic complex are the ships of a potential enemy: aircraft carriers, frigates, cruisers and destroyers. The missile has a long flight range, which relieves its carrier aircraft from the need to enter the zone of foreign funds.
anti-aircraft and anti-missile defense. The rocket itself, having a small
radar signature, high flight speed and the ability to
maneuvering, remains inaccessible to them and makes it difficult to intercept.

The warhead of the complex develops a speed of Mach 10, that is, it is ten times faster than the speed of sound. Strikes can be applied to both land and sea targets, both stationary and moving, and the missile itself can be equipped with both nuclear and non-nuclear warheads ...

Already ten days after the president's speech, footage of successful tests was released. They are intended, among other things, for those who may have doubted the words of the Russian leader. The video clearly shows how the MiG-31 fighter-interceptor performs a combat training launch of the "Dagger" missile, which successfully strikes a given target. Summing up the results of the tests, the Ministry of Defense noted: the launch was carried out normally, during the exercises, the tactical and technical characteristics and time indicators of the aviation missile system were confirmed.

https://naked-science.ru/article/tech/giperzvukovoj-kinzhal-pervaya-lastochka-novyh-vojn

PS The first space velocity for the Moon is 1680 m / s, and the second is 2375 m / s.

[Turbo3000]

I am amazed at you .... I do not understand what you are writing to me? Well, what difference does it make what speed the Dagger has? well, has a speed of 10 swings? so, what is next? it is the speed of tremendous heights. Then it falls into dense layers and its speed will drop several times. In the video, the Dagger hit the bunker at low subsonic speed.

[Orange bigg]

Quote: Turbo3000

I am amazed at you .... I do not understand what you are writing to me? Well, what difference does it make what speed the Dagger has? well, has a speed of 10 swings? so, what is next? it is the speed of tremendous heights. Then it falls into dense layers and its speed will drop several times. In the video, the Dagger hit the bunker at low subsonic speed.

And then what about this statement of yours?

Quote: Turbo3000

99% of articles on the topic of hypersound in Runet are illiterate jingoistic stories of journalists.
I was especially pleased with the speed on the final section of 10000 km / hour))))))
Such a speed is possible only on the moon where there is zero atm pressure and there is no atm resistance, therefore there are so many craters on the moon, there meteorites hit the surface in hypersound, and on the ground, a falling object loses its accumulated speed when entering dense layers ...
therefore hypersonic speed occurs only in the stratosphere

In one post you write that the speed of 10000 km / h is possible only on the moon, and in another already that

.Well, what's the difference, what is the speed of the Dagger? well, has a speed of 10 swings? so, what is next? it is the speed of tremendous heights.

You contradict yourself. We do not live on the Moon, but you say that a speed of 10000 km / h is possible, although you previously stated that this speed can be developed only on the Moon and this is in two neighboring posts.

[Turbo3000]

You are not in the subject at all.
There is zero pressure on the moon, so the Dagger's rocket will have a stable speed of 10 km / h even when hitting the surface of the moon.
There is an atmosphere on the ground, and the Dagger, entering the lower layers of the atmosphere, will lose speed at times due to resistance.
DO YOU UNDERSTAND?

[Orange bigg]

... You are not in the subject at all.

Well, okay. Only you are in the subject. Some special laws of physics work for you. Congratulations.

There is zero pressure on the moon, so the Dagger's rocket will have a stable speed of 10 km / h even when hitting the surface of the moon.
There is an atmosphere on the ground, and the Dagger, entering the lower layers of the atmosphere, will lose speed at times due to resistance.

Colossal conclusions.

DO YOU UNDERSTAND?

Don't be bullied. Otherwise we'll arrange a bullfight for you now. Yes, here not only to me, here everything immediately became clear to everyone. It is nowhere clearer. Better go Easter cakes in the yard of the field.

[rocket757]

Russian anti-aircraft systems intercepted the "hypersonic weapons" of the mock enemy

So for a full test of anti-aircraft systems, you need targets of the appropriate class and performance characteristics.

[Kostadinov]

And by the point of 500 km it will lose speed and turn into a supersonic high-altitude target, by the point of 990 km the speed will drop to the speed of a bicycle.

It dives towards the target before it loses its speed (by about 350-400 km) and detonates a charge of several hundred kilotons for several kilometers at the top. After this, if something from the radars and ICh and other sensors survives, there will be a chance for missile defense.