Britain is considering the possibility of supplying Ukraine with Brimstone missiles of various modifications

46
Britain is considering the possibility of supplying Ukraine with Brimstone missiles of various modifications

The British press publishes materials that speak of deepening military-technical cooperation between London and Kiev. It concerns this kind of "deepening" of arms supplies to Ukraine.

It is noted that the UK is currently considering the issue of possible deliveries of missiles belonging to different classes, including the surface-to-surface class. It is added that the option of supplying air-launched missiles to Ukraine is also being considered in London.



In particular, it is indicated that it is planned to establish the supply of Brimstone missiles, which operate on the "fire and forget" principle. This is a 1,8-meter missile with a cumulative warhead weighing about 6,2 kg (for the aviation version). The British arsenal also has sea-based Brimstone missiles. For Ukraine, it is planned to organize the supply of such missiles, including for increasing the striking power of Ukrainian warships.

It should be noted that today the price of the basic version of the airborne Brimstone rocket is at least 130 thousand US dollars. At the same time, for the appearance of such missiles on the ships and aircraft of the latter, it will be necessary to carry out a certain kind of reformatting of the carriers. How much this may cost the Ukrainian budget is not yet clear.

However, in pursuit of the loyalty of its "partners" from NATO, Kiev is, apparently, ready for any costs, which is what the same Great Britain expects from it.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    46 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. 0
      21 October 2021 06: 19
      Everything rusty - chubaty. But .. for the money.
      1. 0
        21 October 2021 07: 01
        We urgently need to help Argentina with the Malvinas, help with missiles, and delivery vehicles.
      2. 0
        21 October 2021 07: 07
        I also wanted to say. Which Sumer comes up with the headlines? Correctly- England is trying to sell Svidomo another rusty rubbish for expensive.
        1. +1
          21 October 2021 07: 32
          Which Sumer comes up with the headlines?

          Ancient! wink
      3. +1
        21 October 2021 07: 09
        Quote: Andrey Nikolaevich
        Everything rusty - chubaty. But .. for the money.

        We would be so "rusty" ..
        Fortunately, they have nothing to put rockets on
      4. +7
        21 October 2021 07: 23
        The desire of the British to fight Russia with someone else's hands is understandable. This was almost always the case, this is nothing new. But Ukraine's desire to voluntarily become cannon fodder fool .....
      5. 0
        21 October 2021 07: 44
        Everything rusty - chubaty. But .. for the money.

        For credits!))) Cleverly invented, worked out for centuries.
        The only trouble is that the dictators will demand further provocations, and if they have tried them on boats, they will definitely go with rusty, for that they are given weapons.
        And then we have sanctions and a worldwide militia for every otvetka. You need to prick at the root, at least economically and completely arrange the Ambu Judah
      6. +14
        21 October 2021 08: 57
        Is it Brimstones or rusty rubbish ??? Are you adequate there? The RF Armed Forces do not have such a missile at the moment.


        The defeat of objects moving up to 110 km / h without illumination, this time.
        From the air, you can be outside the sphere of frontal systems (such as Arrows / Wasps) and throw these missiles one after another. Which Eurofighter or Tornado carries 12-18 missiles.
        Supersonic missile flight + small size + minimum RCS = very difficult to shoot down. Especially if a whole bunch (from a couple of planes) is flying to a unit, then the calculation of the Shells will not be mastered purely in terms of productivity and target processing.


        If we are talking about the sea. Then the main thing is to have a reserve for the installation of equipment and the launcher itself. It is lightweight. In general, you can try to accommodate even the Islands. And if something happens, PSKR (anyone) will be very, very unpleasant. Yes, even some Albatross / BuyanM three-rocket salvo will seriously damage.
        1. 0
          21 October 2021 09: 49
          Quote: donavi49
          Is it Brimstones or rusty rubbish ??? Are you adequate there? The RF Armed Forces do not have such a missile at the moment.
          We can assume that it already exists. Not a complete analogue, of course, but something similar. This is a 305E rocket.
          https: //bmpd.livejournal.com/4378732.html
          In this case, it will be natural to smile upon reading the word "LAYOUT" (smile), but only slightly, because this rocket is already in serial production:
          The missile "Product 305E", designed to equip modern combat helicopters and presented for the first time at the forum "Army-2021", is being mass-produced. TASS was informed about this by the general designer of the developer - the Mechanical Engineering Design Bureau - Valery Kashin.
          https://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/12212663
          1. 0
            21 October 2021 14: 51
            Quote: Herrr
            It would be natural in this case to smile after reading the word "LAYOUT" (smile) on the corpus, but only slightly, because this rocket is already in serial production:

            Only those who do not know whose money the rocket was made with and who has been working with it for a long time can smile here. The first photos of PU for "product 305" on the machines of this service date back to 2015 - though then people were more interested in mounted electronic equipment and did not pay attention to the APU "with a plate".
            1. +2
              21 October 2021 17: 08
              Border Mil Mi-8AMTSh (Mi-171Sh) airborne RF-20452? On RUSSIANPLANES.NET, the earliest snapshot of him "with a plate" is dated 2016.
              https://russianplanes.net/reginfo/31236
              1. 0
                21 October 2021 19: 22
                Quote: Herrr
                Border Mil Mi-8AMTSh (Mi-171Sh) airborne RF-20452?

                Either he or RF-20451. The author himself wondered what number, only RF-2045 could be disassembled ...
                Quote: Herrr
                On RUSSIANPLANES.NET, the earliest snapshot of him "with a plate" is dated 2016.

                LJ is a godsend for a spy. smile
                Here is the original photo, which the author then enlarged in search of details. Jul 08, 2015

                © "Mi-8 MNP-2 flew to the Gorokhovets training ground"
                https://mil-avia.livejournal.com/103719.html
                1. 0
                  21 October 2021 20: 06
                  The airborne RF-20451 has other "plates" (smile) and, by the way, it is not the Mi-8AMTSh, but the Mi-8MTKO - a variant with lighting equipment adapted to the use of an aerobatic night vision system. Here is this handsome man in the photo below.
                  So in your photos it is the Mi-8AMTSh onboard RF-20452, not otherwise. smile
      7. +4
        21 October 2021 10: 08
        Quote: Andrey Nikolaevich
        Everything rusty - chubaty.

        Shooooo? Brimstones "rusty"? belay This is the modern 3rd generation! And it is improving! New modifications with increased capabilities are being created! In Russia, something similar is just being created, but the Brimstones have already fought!
    2. -2
      21 October 2021 06: 21
      On the one hand, the shaven shit, as always, and on the other, to have business with the shaved ones, they will throw 146%.
    3. +8
      21 October 2021 06: 30
      I don’t know how far Europe’s military cooperation with Ukraine will go. One thing is clear, every action of the West must be countered. No trifle should be ignored.
      1. +3
        21 October 2021 06: 46
        if this goes on, then in 15-20 years, we will get a strong and hostile state at hand.
        1. -2
          21 October 2021 08: 38
          do you think that they will last so much? already in 7 years the country has died. live only on gaster
    4. +1
      21 October 2021 06: 55
      In particular, it is indicated that it is planned to establish the supply of Brimstone missiles, which operate on the principle of “shot and forgot»

      ***
      Are you sure they will let you forget? ...
      ***
      1. -2
        21 October 2021 07: 16
        For Ukraine, it is planned to organize the supply of such missiles, including for increasing the striking power of Ukrainian warships.

        Does Britain mean those ships that it decided to supply to Ukraine, and then changed its mind? What warships does Ukraine have?
        Here just now one general called to equip the Armed Forces of Ukraine with "unconventional" weapons !!! What is this? Who will explain? Maybe these same missiles to non-existent ships?
        1. -6
          21 October 2021 07: 19
          Quote: Egoza
          Does Britain mean those ships that it decided to supply to Ukraine, and then changed its mind?

          Where did you read that you changed your mind?
          1. -1
            21 October 2021 07: 30
            Quote: Jacket in stock
            Where did you read that you changed your mind?

            And you read yesterday's news on VO, if you haven't noticed.
            1. -1
              21 October 2021 07: 31
              https://topwar.ru/188161-s-anglijskim-akcentom-velikobritanija-postroit-korabli-dlja-ukrainskogo-flota.html#comment-id-11863458
              These or what?
              plans to develop missile boats for the Armed Forces of Ukraine, build two in the UK, and six more in Ukraine.

              British specialists are planned to be involved in the construction of two new naval bases near Ochakov and in Berdyansk.
    5. +2
      21 October 2021 07: 13
      The USA allocated 60 billion dollars to Ukraine. for service. The British immediately offer Ukraine various weapons. As a result, the Anglo-Saxons are killing two birds with one stone: they support their weapons manufacturers, and create additional problems for Russia.
      1. -1
        21 October 2021 07: 21
        Quote: askort154
        The United States has allocated 60 billion dollars to Ukraine. for service. The British immediately offer Ukraine various weapons.

        No, not like that.
        America has allocated weapons to Ukraine for 60 million. His own. There, no one "left" will earn anything.
        And the British have allocated their own separate loan, which they themselves will master.
        1. -2
          21 October 2021 07: 36
          Most likely this is this kind of recycling, and they will also raise money.
        2. +1
          21 October 2021 08: 00
          Jacket in stock ....America has allocated weapons to Ukraine for 60 million. His own. There, no one "left" will earn anything.

          Since 2014, the United States has provided Ukraine with over 2 billion dl to support the Ukrainian army. :
          2017-2018 - 350 billion each
          2019 - 250,
          2020 - 300,
          2021 - 235 (and promised 125 more)
          This was expressed not only in the direct supply of weapons, but also in the allocation of funds for reforming the army. So there they mutually "sawed off" well, both the Pentagon and the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
          A 60 ml. this is Biden's "handout" from the amount of the previously frozen 125 million, to show off his concern for Ukraine. hi
      2. -5
        21 October 2021 08: 59
        Quote: askort154
        The Anglo-Saxons are killing two birds with one stone: they support their arms manufacturers and create additional problems for Russia.

        If this program is implemented, then this is not good news and there is no reason to joke.
        But I sincerely doubt that the 404th will pull this program, it is expensive at 130 pieces per rocket, the accompanying equipment will pull a lot of costs
    6. +5
      21 October 2021 08: 15
      Ban is not provided for customers like "nikishov" (see his pictures below)?
      1. 0
        21 October 2021 09: 04
        now the admins wake up and send the cache to the ban laughing
      2. -1
        21 October 2021 09: 59
        Quote: Dmitry Nikolaevich Fedunov
        Ban is not provided for customers like "nikishov" (see his pictures below)?

        Why not ? Ban is a measure against insults ... And here is an obvious insult! This is Our site (!) And it is not for wild mad Banderlog ... they have no place here!
    7. 0
      21 October 2021 08: 38
      It will be necessary to install a sighting system on airplanes, and there is 90% rubbish. This is only if the UK also gives a couple of fighters to the missiles.
    8. -1
      21 October 2021 09: 00
      From the article under discussion:
      For Ukraine, it is planned to organize the supply of such missiles [Brimstone], including, to increase the striking power of Ukrainian warships.
      Aha, the legend is fresh. laughing
      Only the day before yesterday we read here on VO that:
      The news of a change in the plans of the British military caused a murmur in the Ukraine. Indeed, Kiev was counting on London to transfer its decommissioned ships [three River I patrol ships (OPV): HMS Severn, HMS Tyne and HMS Mersey] for the needs of the Ukrainian Navy.
      https://topwar.ru/188242-vms-velikobritanii-peredumali-spisyvat-patrulnye-korabli.html
      What are the Ukrainian warships? request
    9. +1
      21 October 2021 09: 28
      deepening military-technical cooperation between London and Kiev
      Well, how is it in such a "booze" from without London. For the British to miss the opportunity to harm Russia? They will die faster, but they will not miss the chance. In addition, there is a great desire to sell to Ukrainians what is stuck in warehouses. Here you have both "support" and earnings.
    10. -4
      21 October 2021 09: 44
      Yeah, and after some time, these missiles will end up in Moscow and competent comrades will study them thoughtfully))) Britons are not so bad))))
    11. -1
      21 October 2021 12: 02
      Brimstone rusty trash? Probably as rusty as the Polish M1A2C? Hmmm ...
    12. -1
      21 October 2021 12: 43
      the next duck is not to not to well, you get the idea.
    13. +1
      21 October 2021 17: 59
      Yes, of course, no matter how much it costs, the main thing is that the "partners" would appreciate it! )) And the "partners", read - the owners of the GUT in general, all the trash can not be written off, but dumped into dill, under the loud slogans of protecting democracy and "universal values."
    14. 0
      21 October 2021 20: 23
      Ukraine, as a state, must be liquidated urgently.
    15. -1
      21 October 2021 21: 36
      1. Rockets are great. Their appearance near Kiev is a headache for us.
      2. Just donating rockets will not work - they have to be put on something. It is unlikely that it will work on airplanes - it is too expensive. Because I vote for boats, because the British build them or some other near-sea things.
    16. 0
      22 October 2021 09: 42
      Quote: Nastia Makarova
      do you think that they will last so much? already in 7 years the country has died. live only on gaster

      5 years maximum. And the end through the war.
    17. 0
      22 October 2021 15: 51
      Your product will not help, evil, disgusting "Durimar"! )))
    18. 0
      22 October 2021 21: 50
      Yes, extra money appeared) To buy an air wing for two aircraft carriers did not work out, so they think - where to write off the loot?

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"