Military Review

The Ministry of Defense announced the adoption of a Project 22160 patrol ship in the Black Sea Fleet

63
The Ministry of Defense announced the adoption of a Project 22160 patrol ship in the Black Sea Fleet

The Russian Ministry of Defense announced the timing of admission to the Black Sea fleet the fourth patrol ship of project 22160 "Sergey Kotov". The ship is being completed at the Zaliv shipyard in Kerch.


According to the press service of the military department, at present "Sergei Kotov" is preparing to undergo factory sea trials, which will begin in the near future. Prior to this, the ship was completed and passed the stage of mooring tests. Factory running gear will smoothly turn into state ones, after which the patrol ship will be transferred to the Black Sea Fleet.

Reportedly, "Sergei Kotov" will become part of the ship formation of the Novorossiysk naval base by the end of the year. The exact date of the ceremony of raising the Andreevsky flag is not given.

The patrol ship "Sergei Kotov" was named in honor of the Hero of the Soviet Union, participant in the defense of Odessa and Sevastopol, the liberation of Novorossiysk and Crimea, Rear Admiral Sergei Kotov. It is the fourth ship of Project 22160 and the third production ship in a series of six ships. Laid down on May 8, 2016, launched on January 29, 2021. The entire series is intended for the Black Sea Fleet, the first three ships are already in service, two more are being completed in Zelenodolsk.

Project 22160 patrol ship (corvette) has a displacement of 1700 tons and is capable of speeds up to 30 knots. Cruising range - 6000 miles, autonomy - 60 days. The crew is 80 people. On board, the Ka-27PS helicopter is based. As standard weapons, the corvettes are equipped with a 76-mm artillery mount, anti-aircraft missile system and machine guns. A place is provided for the placement of various modules (RCC, missiles, electronic warfare, etc.), depending on the tasks performed.
Photos used:
https://zalivkerch.com/
63 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. knn54
    knn54 19 October 2021 14: 36
    -6
    -in the composition of the connection of ships of the Novorossiysk naval base by the end of the year.
    Against the Georgian Navy.
    1. Kalmar
      Kalmar 19 October 2021 14: 46
      +5
      Quote: knn54
      Against the Georgian Navy.

      Then the Georgians need at least one boat to give, but now, as I understand, they can only swear from the shore))
    2. Flooding
      Flooding 19 October 2021 14: 46
      +5
      Quote: knn54
      Against the Georgian Navy.

      against Georgia's patrol boats to build a series of corvettes with a cannon?
      I do not understand something.
      1. Region-25.rus
        Region-25.rus 20 October 2021 00: 55
        +2
        against Georgia's patrol boats to build a series of corvettes with a cannon?
        I do not understand something.
        there is such a "friendly" country Turkey. Have you not heard?
        1. Flooding
          Flooding 20 October 2021 02: 21
          0
          Quote: Region-25.rus
          there is such a "friendly" country Turkey. Have you not heard?

          1. we read the above comment about Georgia. I answered exactly to him
          2.we read even higher about the composition of the weapons of the ships of pr. 22160
      2. Stepan S
        Stepan S 20 October 2021 10: 32
        0
        against Georgia's patrol boats to build a series of corvettes with a cannon?

        It just so happened that they are not capable of more. Maybe at least they will be able to do this task.
    3. Sergey1964
      Sergey1964 19 October 2021 15: 29
      +3
      Quote: knn54
      Against the Georgian Navy.

      I apologize for the amateurish question from Siberia (yes, I served, but under Soviet rule, a chemist-instructor-dosimnrist). Are we (Russia in general, and native Siberia - in particular) threatened by the Georgian Navy? If so, how and how to fend off the threat?
      1. Bad_gr
        Bad_gr 19 October 2021 18: 36
        -5
        Quote: Sergey1964
        If so, how and how to fend off the threat?

        According to these threats, this corvette was created, which, with a displacement of 1700, is armed with one cannon (I have a suspicion that it is needed for a salute).
        1. Sergey1964
          Sergey1964 20 October 2021 05: 53
          +2
          Quote: Bad_gr
          According to these threats, this corvette was created, which, with a displacement of 1700, is armed with one cannon (I have a suspicion that it is needed for a salute).

          I trust you, but, being guided by the rule "trust but verify" (a professional deformation inherent in all experimenters), I studied the materiel on Wikipedia. There, besides the cannon, there are two more machine guns.
          According to Wikipedia - this is "Vladimirov's heavy machine gun (CPV, GAU index - 56-P-562) - heavy machine gun developed by S. V. Vladimirov. Developed in 1944, put into service in 1949. It successfully combines the rate of fire of the easel machine gun with armor-piercing anti-tank rifle ".
          So, there are two of these machine guns, if I understood the description correctly. That is, this ship will, on occasion, be able to shoot back from two enemy tanks of the 1944 model (or even the 1949 model), thanks to the successful combination "with the armor-piercing anti-tank rifle" (c).
          1. Stepan S
            Stepan S 20 October 2021 10: 34
            +1
            On the other hand, this ship will be able, on occasion, to shoot back from two enemy tanks of the 1944 (or even the 1949) model of the year, thanks to the successful combination "with the armor-piercing anti-tank rifle" (c).

            There is no need to tell our Commander-in-Chief how else this ship can be used, or even the cannon will be removed as unnecessary.
            1. Sergey1964
              Sergey1964 20 October 2021 12: 18
              +2
              Quote: Stepan S
              There is no need to tell our Commander-in-Chief how else this ship can be used, or even the cannon will be removed as unnecessary.

              Oops. My foul, no more, honest pioneer.
          2. Bad_gr
            Bad_gr 20 October 2021 11: 46
            -1
            Quote: Sergey1964
            There, besides the cannon, there are two more machine guns.

            Except machine guns. the ship probably also has personal weapons, like the PM from the officer corps - shall we consider the same? Such a ship can only protect itself from an armed fishing seiner. This is not a ship - a ship.
            1. Sergey1964
              Sergey1964 20 October 2021 12: 25
              0
              Quote: Bad_gr
              Except machine guns. the ship probably also has personal weapons, like the PM from the officer corps - shall we consider the same? Such a ship can only protect itself from an armed fishing seiner.

              To increase firepower, I would suggest giving the crew anti-tank rifles as a personal weapon. So that not only with two machine guns (which, as Wikipedia teaches, "successfully combine the rate of fire of a heavy machine gun with the armor-piercing of an anti-tank rifle"), but also directly fight off adversaries with anti-tank rifles.
      2. Sergey3
        Sergey3 19 October 2021 18: 46
        -5
        Georgia, theoretically, can become a NATO member, so American tomahawks may well fly to your Siberia right from the coast of Georgia.
        1. bayard
          bayard 20 October 2021 00: 05
          -1
          They will not reach, the range will not be enough.
          1. Pankrat25
            Pankrat25 20 October 2021 06: 30
            -1
            The declared range of tomahawks is 2500 km. Considering that our air-launched cruise missiles fly 5000 km, it is possible that some modifications of tomahawks can do the same.
            1. bayard
              bayard 20 October 2021 08: 14
              +1
              Quote: Pankrat25
              The declared range of tomahawks is 2500 km.

              No . Even with a nuclear warhead (which is much lighter than usual) - 2400 km. This is not enough. And there are no Tomahawks with nuclear warheads - they are prohibited, only conventional heads.
              Open the maps and see the distance from Georgia to Siberia.
              And they will not reach yet because they will become easy prey for fighter aircraft and will be destroyed.
              Quote: Pankrat25
              Considering that our air-launched cruise missiles fly 5000 km, it is possible that some modifications of tomahawks can do the same.

              fool They do not have such missiles. And there was never even an attempt to get one.
              Never ever .
              There weren't even such fantasies.
              The modern "Tomahawk" flies at a maximum of 1500 - 1700 km, but even at such a range they have never been launched, a maximum of 700 kilometers, they are afraid to take risks, suddenly they will not reach it.
              This is precisely the statistics of practical launches.
              Long-range CDs are only with us. But we need them more - we don't have so many offshore platforms for them. And our torpedo tubes are longer, namely, their size limited the dimension (and hence the range) of both the Tomahawk and our Caliber. Therefore, our caliber with a conventional warhead flies 2400 - 2500 km. , and with nuclear warheads - up to 3500 km. Of course in a straight line and at the optimum height. At WWI it is slightly lower.
              1. Pankrat25
                Pankrat25 22 October 2021 13: 18
                -2
                Before you write nonsense here, at least look at the performance characteristics. Rocket Kh-101 / Kh-102, range 5500 km, and according to some sources, all 10000 (with nuclear warheads).
                For the new X-555 and X-95, the range of more than 5500 is included in the official performance characteristics.
                And what do you think the Yankees are more stupid than us and they still have nothing like this? I do not believe!!! It is not in vain that they count on a quick global disarming strike, where the main role is assigned to cruise missiles.
                Tomahawk "BGM-109, here is a link to an article with performance characteristics, these performance characteristics are freely available not only in this article, and by the way, this rocket is obsolete and in Syria they fired for the last time with a more advanced model!
                https://missilery.info/missile/bgm109c-d
                1. bayard
                  bayard 22 October 2021 13: 45
                  -3
                  Young man, in what regiments did you serve? This is actually a military site, originally created as a veteran one. Here, do not assume, but you need to KNOW in order to assert something. Your knowledge is extremely superficial.
                  Quote: Pankrat25
                  Rocket Kh-101 / Kh-102, range 5500 km,

                  smile
                  4500 km. with a conventional (high-explosive) warhead.
                  5500 km with YABCH.
                  Quote: Pankrat25
                  The new X-555

                  belay New?
                  This is the good old X-55, which instead of the standard nuclear warhead, they installed a conventional high-explosive one.
                  She's as old as ... a mammoth tusk.
                  Quote: Pankrat25
                  and X-95

                  And what kind of animal is this?
                  Has anyone seen him?
                  What is known about the performance characteristics?
                  Nothing.
                  Most likely a journalistic fake, or a renaming of what was previously positioned as the X-50 - a subsonic compact unobtrusive CD with a range of 1500 - 2500 km. for basing on Tu-22M3 \ M3M (up to 10 units) and on Tu-160 \ 160M (up to 24 units). In general, this is the answer to the emergence of a new ALCM in the United States and an attempt to resolve the issue of massive volley by a limited number of carriers.
                  Quote: Pankrat25
                  And what do you think the Yankees are dumber than us

                  No, they just have their own view of things. They make new lightweight and compact missile launchers with a range of about 1000 km. , which can carry both tactical aircraft (4 pieces each) and strategic aircraft - the same B-1B is capable of carrying up to 32 pieces.
                  The quantity is more important to them, not the range, because they have no problems with carriers (aircraft, ships) and their basing.
                  Quote: Pankrat25
                  I do not believe!!!

                  We don't have a religious sect here.
                  And not a drama theater. request
                  You can believe in anything, even a pasta monster, but this has nothing to do with reality.
                  Quote: Pankrat25
                  It is not in vain that they count on a quick global disarming strike, where the main role is assigned to cruise missiles.

                  They have been "calculating" this tactic since 1945. And always exactly on the "sudden" and "quick" blow. Starting with "Shot Shot".
                  Quote: Pankrat25
                  where the main role is assigned to cruise missiles.

                  Yes But they calculate differently than you dream.
                  What do you know about their operational plans?
                  I think no more than a certain X-95.
        2. Sergey1964
          Sergey1964 20 October 2021 06: 27
          -3
          Quote: Sergey3
          Georgia, theoretically, can become a NATO member, so American tomahawks may well fly to your Siberia right from the coast of Georgia.

          You have already been answered
          Quote: bayard
          They will not reach, the range will not be enough.

          But even if they could fly - so what? A lot of things can fly to us - for example, a brick on our head, an icicle from the roof, a drunk driver at a pedestrian crossing, an asteroid, aggressive aliens ... What now, to be afraid of everything?
        3. Ingvvar08
          Ingvvar08 20 October 2021 09: 35
          +2
          If it reaches OUR Siberia, then YOUR Georgia will burn to the ground.
          1. Sergey1964
            Sergey1964 20 October 2021 12: 37
            -5
            Quote: Ingvvar08
            If it reaches OUR Siberia, then YOUR Georgia will burn to the ground.

            1) "Completely" is written together. I wonder why all the jingoistic patriots are so illiterate?
            2) Siberia is not yours. As a hereditary Siberian, I tell you this. Perhaps you are also a Siberian - but Siberia is still not yours. Do not believe me - try to poke your nose into any of the protected areas of those in power.
            3) If patriotism leaps to you - come to defend the Russians in the Republic of Tyva (nee - "Tuva"). There Russians (those who still remained after the rise of local national consciousness) are greatly offended. Just first take a dictionary of the Tuvan language with you - today's Tuvan youth practically does not speak Russian.
    4. g1v2
      g1v2 20 October 2021 17: 31
      +2
      This is a ship of the far sea zone. Georgia is at your side. There MRK and corvettes behind the eyes.
  2. The leader of the Redskins
    The leader of the Redskins 19 October 2021 14: 39
    +9
    Seven feet under the keel.
    Not a cruiser, of course, but ...
    Superfluous, I think, will not be.
  3. Borisych
    Borisych 19 October 2021 14: 43
    -2
    It's bad that the ram was not attached. Now it's fashionable to ram everyone. A corvette with a cannon is, of course, an achievement.
  4. maxim k.
    maxim k. 19 October 2021 14: 54
    -6
    Against the Ukrainian gunners, that's it. drinks
  5. JD1979
    JD1979 19 October 2021 14: 57
    -13
    My condolences to the Black Sea people.
  6. Jacket in stock
    Jacket in stock 19 October 2021 14: 58
    -13
    Is that the one they did against the Somali pirates?
    But the pirates did not wait for him. And against Georgian / Ukrainian boats, he will be rather weak on the hike.
  7. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 19 October 2021 15: 00
    +1
    Give a bookmark, the nuclear destroyer Leader, in Zelenodolsk, you can in parts, then drag it along the canals. Joke. What can be built in Zelenodolsk? Critics, find a free slipway at shipyards, where you can start building, a ship of the first rank.
    1. Mole13
      Mole13 19 October 2021 15: 09
      +1
      Quote: tralflot1832
      Critics, find a free slipway in the shipyards to start building a rank XNUMX ship

      Are all the seats taken or what? We can when we want!)
    2. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 19 October 2021 17: 06
      +9
      Quote: tralflot1832
      Critics, find a free slipway in the shipyards where you can start building a rank XNUMX ship.

      Since when did 22160 become a rank XNUMX ship?
      And wouldn't it be better, instead of these "doves of peace", to build IPCs that are really needed by the fleet at the same capacities? Because what the Navy now has in this class no longer walks, but floats - all our "albatrosses" were built for the USSR Navy.
    3. for
      for 19 October 2021 17: 38
      +3
      Quote: tralflot1832
      Critics, find a free slipway in the shipyards where you can start building a rank XNUMX ship.

      Everything is occupied by oil and gas carriers and icebreakers.
    4. The Little Humpbacked Horse
      The Little Humpbacked Horse 20 October 2021 01: 05
      +3
      Quote: tralflot1832
      Critics, find a free slipway in the shipyards where you can start building a rank XNUMX ship.

      The Dutch company Rensen-Driessen Shipbuilding BV has suspended the delivery of orders related to the construction of hulls for oil tankers at the Kostroma shipyard. The REGNUM correspondent was informed about this by the advisor to the general director of the enterprise Andrei Babin.
      “The Dutch have very strict requirements for partners who build ships for them. The main goal is that the owners of enterprises should not have bankruptcy, problems with the law, the property of enterprises should belong to the owners. The situation at the shipyard is now the exact opposite. They suspended the conclusion of contracts with Kostroma until the situation with the future of the shipyard becomes clear. Business security and saving money for the Dutch company are priority tasks, ”said Andrei Babin.
      Kostroma started working with Holland in 2017. During this time, the shipyard built and launched 6 tanker hulls. In the next five years, the company hoped to sign contracts for the construction of another 10-15 such ships. In June 2021, the shipyard was declared bankrupt, and bankruptcy proceedings were opened against it. The main creditor of the shipyard is the Deposit Insurance Agency (DIA), the amount of its claims is 220 million rubles.
      The company hoped to get out of the crisis by concluding an investment deal with “capital financial institutions”. It was planned that they will provide the shipyard with orders and financial guarantees, due to which the shipbuilders will gradually cover their debts to the DIA. Whether such an agreement will be concluded is not yet clear. Orders for the construction of the 7th and 8th hulls of oil tankers, which were to be built in Kostroma, were transferred to Chinese enterprises.
  8. xomaNN
    xomaNN 19 October 2021 15: 00
    0
    With its speed, there is no decent URO, it is more likely to be on duty in the hospital near the Kerch bridge, like the frontier. But "a tit in the hand is better." And it's time to make a qualitative breakthrough with domestic ship turbines and engines. Below 30 knots, the current sides are much worse than the Soviet ships of the "mosquito fleet".
    1. APASUS
      APASUS 19 October 2021 15: 56
      0
      Quote: xomaNN
      Below 30 knots, the current sides are much worse than the Soviet ships of the "mosquito fleet".

      So this is still with MTU. He was offered a replacement 10D49 "Kolomensky Zavod" but it is not yet known whether it will pull 30 knots
      1. next322
        next322 19 October 2021 17: 21
        +5
        the maximum speed of this pigeon is 25 knots ..... even against high-speed future ukrokaters it is simply useless
        1. Castro Ruiz
          Castro Ruiz 19 October 2021 18: 04
          +1
          And the real one is not vishshe 23 knots.
    2. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 19 October 2021 17: 08
      +8
      Quote: xomaNN
      With its speed, there is no decent URO, it is more likely to be on duty in the hospital near the Kerch bridge, like the border crossing point.

      So he was according to the PSKR project. But for some reason the Navy ordered it for the Navy.
      Quote: xomaNN
      But "a tit in the hand is better."

      What for? The FSB has its own PSKR. And Project 22160 cannot perform purely naval tasks - there is nothing.
      1. Serg65
        Serg65 20 October 2021 07: 12
        +1
        hi Welcome Alex!
        Quote: Alexey RA
        Project 22160 cannot perform purely naval tasks - there is nothing.

        Well, from what, the tracking function with its cruising range and autonomy will even perfectly perform, and if you put reconnaissance on it with equipment and electronic warfare in a container, then it will spoil a lot of blood to our "partners" in their order laughing
        1. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA 20 October 2021 14: 30
          0
          Quote: Serg65
          Well, from what, the tracking function with its cruising range and autonomy will even perfectly perform, and if you put reconnaissance on it with equipment and electronic warfare in a container, then it will spoil a lot of blood to our "partners" in their order laughing

          So the ersatz of 22160 specialized RZK available in the fleet will not be able to block the equipment anyway.
          And for direct tracking, the 22160's speed is too small. And all sorts of bad things are written about his seaworthiness.
          1. Serg65
            Serg65 21 October 2021 07: 58
            0
            Quote: Alexey RA
            for direct tracking of 22160, the speed is too small

            laughing Well, AUG is not flying on the wings!
            Quote: Alexey RA
            all sorts of bad things are written about his seaworthiness

            There are a lot of things right now, but there are problems with the truth recourse
  9. KrolikZanuda
    KrolikZanuda 19 October 2021 15: 20
    +3
    Oh, Osipov was thrown another suitcase without a handle. Well, at least they did not spread the project to other fleets.
  10. seregin-s1
    seregin-s1 19 October 2021 15: 25
    -7
    Vsepalschiki howled, even funny! All our life in the sea at 35 knots passed without reducing the speed.)) At the same time, shooting from all calibers!))
    1. tralflot1832
      tralflot1832 19 October 2021 15: 41
      -3
      To ride all the wanderers in a 6-ball storm at least at 16 knots on the sea! What a pleasure.drinks
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 19 October 2021 16: 58
        +6
        The question is ... what, who to patrol and WHAT?
        What about reconnaissance, control and threat search systems ... the same submarines and mines ???
        This is not an idle question. It is advisable to understand why he is and how he CAN perform the tasks for which he is intended.
    2. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 19 October 2021 17: 29
      +10
      Quote: seregin-s1
      Vsepalschiki howled, even funny! All our life in the sea at 35 knots passed without reducing the speed.)) At the same time, shooting from all calibers!))

      It’s just that all the supporters are interested in the need to build a series of unarmed, blind and deaf "flag demonstrators" for the Navy, 80% of whose tasks do not belong to the competence of the Navy, but are carried out according to the law by a completely different department.
      And also very interested in the need to do this exactly at the time when the ships for the protection of the water area are about to go for decommissioning, leaving our SSBN bases without a nearby submarine.
      1. konstantin68
        konstantin68 19 October 2021 18: 04
        -2
        Quote: Alexey RA
        It’s just that all the supporters are interested in the need to build a series of unarmed, blind and deaf "flag demonstrators for the Navy.

        There are no unarmed deaf-blind people at 1700 tons. A helicopter plus options for combat equipment is enough for the Black Sea TVD.
        1. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA 19 October 2021 19: 41
          +3
          Quote: konstantin68
          There are no unarmed deaf-blind people at 1700 tons. A helicopter plus options for combat equipment is enough for the Black Sea TVD.

          Search and rescue a helicopter and two types of containers, of which zero are armed (there are only diving and GAS). The perfect patrol ship. laughing

          A simple question - is there an anti-submarine armament cellar and an armament lift on the deck on 22160, which are mandatory for basing an anti-submarine helicopter? At the Airbase, the discussion of this issue stretched twenty pages, examined 22160 from all sides - and did not find it. At 20380 there is a lift and a cellar (moreover, the lift doors on it are perfectly visible in the photo, since they have mandatory warning markings), but at 22160 they do not.

          And finally, the manufacturer's brochure indicating the types of helicopters that can be based on 22160:
          1. konstantin68
            konstantin68 19 October 2021 19: 49
            -5
            Everything is correct. But this only confirms my words.
            Or do our ships constantly come into contact with the enemy?
            1. Alexey RA
              Alexey RA 19 October 2021 20: 00
              +8
              Quote: konstantin68
              Everything is correct. But this only confirms my words.
              Or do our ships constantly come into contact with the enemy?

              And why are they needed then? In air defense they cannot. In PLO they cannot. Against ships and the coast, they cannot. What's left? Radar patrol? So for this we need a high-located radar and at least self-defense in air defense, so that they do not be nailed before the patrol detects something. Moreover, in the dimensions of the Black Sea, the tasks of the RLD ship will be successfully completed by a pair of Sushki.
              For this ship, any contact with an adversary is fatal - because he will be the last for him. And in most cases, 22160 of this adversary will not even notice.

              And most importantly, the Navy now desperately needs a ship that could search for and strike enemy submarines in the near zone with onboard weapons. Without it, we can immediately send our SSBNs (40% of strategic SBS) to the joke.
              22160 in its current configuration cannot be such a ship. And what they draw to us from it in modernization perspective, at a cost approaching 20385.
              1. konstantin68
                konstantin68 19 October 2021 20: 49
                -4
                Quote: Alexey RA
                Without it, we can immediately send our SSBNs to the joke (40% of strategic SBS).

                This is a controversial statement. But I'm actually talking about the Black Sea Fleet, where there is a use for the steamer.
                And so yes, there is nothing to cover the "sites", even for deployment.
                1. Alexey RA
                  Alexey RA 20 October 2021 14: 10
                  0
                  Quote: konstantin68
                  This is a controversial statement.

                  So if there is nothing to ensure the exit from the base - how to withdraw SSBNs? "Albatrosses" - everything, all of them are already "over thirty", there is not just obsolescence, but physical wear and tear.
                  Quote: konstantin68
                  But I'm actually talking about the Black Sea Fleet, where there is a use for the steamer.

                  At the World Championships, all possible tasks of this "dove of peace" are solved by the means already available to the fleet.
                  That is the trouble with project 22160, that it is, firstly, redundant for the fleet, and, secondly, money, resources, time are spent on it, which could be used to build small ships much more necessary for the Navy.
            2. Region-25.rus
              Region-25.rus 20 October 2021 00: 58
              0
              Or do our ships constantly come into contact with the enemy?
              that is, if they don't shoot in peacetime, then ... in the event of war, shooting is not needed either?
  11. Well done
    Well done 19 October 2021 15: 40
    -2
    Beautiful. The deckhouse looks great. Another would be to have a battering ram on board, trailed. And then shooting from a caliber 76 is expensive. They do not even tolerate 30mm blanks. Have pity on the psyche of the heroes!)
  12. Castro Ruiz
    Castro Ruiz 19 October 2021 23: 12
    -2
    This is a dengue vibrating to the wind.
    Better bi Karakurti finalization to the PLO corvette was built.
  13. Barberry25
    Barberry25 20 October 2021 10: 10
    -1
    power 10D49 ... it seems like there are no problems with it, can then replace the MPK / MRK in the form of a sooo simplified corvette 20380 with UVP for OVR ships?
  14. Pavel57
    Pavel57 20 October 2021 13: 20
    0
    Will go to guard the Bridge.
    1. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 21 October 2021 12: 41
      0
      Quote: Pavel57
      Will go to guard the Bridge.

      There, and so the contenders are above the roof - the FSB with its guard and the Russian Guard with its 39th naval detachment.
  15. = VolodeY =
    = VolodeY = 21 October 2021 13: 42
    -1
    The ship is necessary! I guess what his goals are. (Will sink inflatable Ukrainian aircraft carriers!)
  16. eehnie
    eehnie 22 October 2021 02: 01
    -1
    In this project, I think it would be better if the Kalibr missiles would be mounted since the begin.