"Black Death". The pandemic that changed the world

52

Introduction


Between 1347 and 1351, the first plague pandemic swept the trade routes of the Silk Road to China, the Middle East and Europe, killing millions. It returned periodically on a smaller scale until the 18th century.

This disease had many strains. The most famous of these was the bubonic plague, so called because of the round black buboes formed by the swelling of the victim's lymph nodes. As a result, up to 60% of those infected with the plague died. This strain can still be found in parts of China to this day.



Even more deadly was pneumonic plague, which was transmitted through the air from person to person and was fatal in at least 95% of cases.

This is common knowledge.

What is not so well known is that the arrival of the plague in the 14th century was actually the second time that plague has visited Europe. The first pandemic struck the Eastern Roman Empire in the 6th century when Emperor Justinian tried to retake the West.

It is interesting to note how closely the emergence of both pandemics coincides with two of the greatest turning points in Europe. stories: the first is associated with the decline and fall of the Roman Empire, and the second - with the decline of feudalism.

In this article we will look at the "second coming" of the plague and its impact on history.

However, first of all it is necessary to understand how society was organized in the 14th century; and how the huge external shock of the pandemic affected its internal dynamics.

Society in 1347


The first thing to keep in mind when looking at European society in 1347 is that it was organized on a completely different basis than modern capitalist society. The vast majority of the population (up to 90% in the same England) lived and worked in rural areas. The basic unit of society could not be found in a factory or in a city - although increasingly prosperous medieval cities certainly existed - but in a feudal estate.

The estate was, in fact, a village in which the peasants rented land from the "owner of the estate" in exchange for part of their produce. This form of exploitation, called serfdom, formed the basis of the entire feudal system.

Under feudalism, the most powerful class in society was not the bankers and industrialists who rule society today. At this stage, the industrial bourgeoisie did not really exist. The closest to her were the artisans of the guilds who lived and worked in the cities. Banking existed only in a very primitive form. Merchants were the most powerful and influential layer of the bourgeoisie. But the dashing Golden Age of the merchant capitalist has not yet arrived.

The ruling class consisted of the military feudal nobility and the church: "those who fight" and "those who pray." But apart from prayers and battles, the nobility also owned almost all of the land, with the exception of common lands such as forests, etc.

As owners of the most important means of production at the time - the land - the priests and nobles naturally had a monopoly over the political, intellectual, and spiritual institutions of society.

There was no working class as we know it today.

Instead of a struggle between wage laborers and their superiors over wages, working hours, and working conditions, the class struggle in the feudal countryside was waged mainly by serfs who sought freedom from forced labor and lower rents.

This system, as outdated as it may seem today, nevertheless played a progressive role in the withdrawal of Europe from the Dark Ages. Between the 10th and 13th centuries, Europe's population roughly tripled to around 80 million, the highest in nearly 1000 years.

Almost disappearing in the Dark Ages, internal trade within Europe began to revive along with medieval cities and an emerging bourgeoisie. Foreign trade with Africa and Asia began to flourish. In a bitter irony of fate, it was this expansion of trade that caused the plague to spread so rapidly across the European continent.

The limits of feudalism


However, no social system is capable of continuous development of society. At a certain stage, economic relations that served as a stimulus for progress and development turn into fetters for further development. Feudal society reached this point even before the plague struck.

By the early 14th century, the feudal system had reached its limits. The expansion of agriculture on virgin lands, which in the previous period stimulated the growth of production and population, has come to an end. Thus, the food surplus began to decline in relation to the population. Labor productivity could not keep up, constrained by the limited production of the estate and the insatiable consumption of the lords.

The peasant majority became poorer and poorer, while the lords pressed more and more. A terrible pan-European famine, considered the worst in European history, struck in 1307, killing 10-25% of the population.

The plague is coming


It is believed that the plague first appeared in the Gobi Desert in the 1320s. Dispersed throughout Eurasia by Mongol traders and horsemen, it arrived in China in the 1330s and killed about a quarter of the population.

It then spread westward, and one chronicler stated:

“India was depopulated; Tartary, Mesopotamia, Syria, Armenia were covered with corpses; the Kurds fled to the mountains in vain. "

As with today's COVID-19 pandemic, Italy was the first European country to be hit by the virus. Genoese merchants who traded along the Black Sea coast unwittingly caught the plague and carried it home and to the rest of the Mediterranean. From here, it quickly spread throughout Europe.

At the time, Cairo was one of the largest cities in the world, and it was particularly hard hit. At the peak of the pandemic, the daily death toll in Cairo reached 7000.

The famous scholar and historian Ibn Khaldun, who lost both of his parents to the plague, wrote at the time:

“The civilization in both the East and the West was visited by a devastating plague that devastated the peoples and led to the disappearance of the population. She absorbed many benefits of civilization and wiped them off the face of the earth ... "

By the end of the pandemic, 200 people had died from the plague in Cairo alone - more than the total population of nearly every Christian city at the time. The scale of the destruction was so great that, both in the West and in the East, many cities were unable to restore their population, which existed before the plague, until the 000th century.

Despair


It is not difficult to imagine the horror and despair that gripped society when such apocalyptic scenes appeared that seemed to descend on humanity out of nowhere. None of the usual practices of preventing and treating disease provided any protection against the plague. Medicine proved to be completely powerless against the spread of the disease.

The plague also served to expose the institutions of the church, whose spiritual protection proved to be utterly ineffective against the calamity, which many perceived as a clear sign of "God's wrath."

There were many cases when local priests fled to escape the plague. This has created widespread mistrust and doubt in the church - though not Christianity or religion in general - and has spawned many new religious movements.

One such movement was the flagellant sect, which spread throughout Europe and was particularly strong in the German-speaking and Dutch-speaking world.

Flagellants wandered from city to city in groups of 50 to 300 for 33 and a half days, symbolizing the time of Christ on earth. During this time, they were forbidden to talk, wash, or sleep in soft beds. And upon arrival in a city, they knelt down and beat themselves with whips as punishment for the sins of mankind in the hope that this would put an end to the plague.

In the early stages of this movement, the arrival of a group of flagellants was often greeted with joy by the residents, who saw in them a genuine spiritual protection against the plague - in contrast to the official church, which was widely discredited. However, over time, the movement began to split along class lines.

Influenced by the poor masses who joined its ranks, the movement began to take the form of a kind of revolutionary sect. Many flagellants believed that the old Holy Roman Emperor Frederick Barbarossa would be resurrected, expel the clergy and force the rich to marry the poor, after which Christ himself would return to Earth.

These ideas repelled first the nobles, then the more respectable bourgeois, and in the end even the more wealthy peasants. Over time, the movement dwindled to the poorest and most disadvantaged sections of society.

Another result of the despair that arose during the plague was a wave of pogroms against Jews throughout Europe, which during this period took on appalling proportions. In many places, especially in cities, Jews were accused of deliberately spreading the plague or poisoning wells. As a result, thousands of Jews were killed.

The church and the feudal authorities actually took small steps to protect the Jews, denying the accusations against them. But this did little to stem the tide of bloodshed. In the end, this provoked a massive migration of Jews fleeing persecution to the East and, in particular, to Poland, where they were invited to settle by King Casimir III.

Economic crisis


In addition to the deep psychological and moral crisis caused by the plague, the feudal economy was literally brought to a standstill. This caused an intense and prolonged crisis for the ruling class with important historical consequences.

A good indicator of the scale of the crisis can be considered England, where the plague first came in September 1348. On the estate of Cuxham, near Oxford, owned by the prestigious Merton College, the college lands have been out of work due to a sharp decline in population. This caused a widespread drop in rents, which hit the estate's income. At the same time, hired workers had to be recruited to work on the land for high wages.

This double blow - in the context of falling demand and prices for staple food crops such as wheat - permanently cut the estate's “profit”. They fell from an average of £ 40 a year before 1349 to less than £ 11 in 1354-1355.

Overall, it is estimated that the incomes of the feudal aristocracy across England fell by more than 20% between 1347 and 1353. Along with the collapse of the manorial system, the high mortality rate also led to the fact that many noble families lost their heirs, which meant that many previously great families simply became nothing.

This could not but affect the position of the exploited population. In 1349, wages doubled on many estates. At the Cuxham estate, a plowman was paid 10 shillings 6 pence in 1350 for work that would have earned him only 2 shillings in 1347.

Also, the wide availability of land and low rents meant that peasants were more mobile than they possibly ever were. Serfdom in this context was both impossible and absurd.

Reaction and revolution


Unsurprisingly, the ruling class acted quickly to try to revert to the old order. In 1349, Edward III introduced the Labor Law, which intended to set wages at the pre-1348 level, but to no avail.

The church also joined the landowners' crusade to return to the old conditions.

Such an obvious and transparent clash of interests between the gentlemen and the common peasant masses inevitably should have caused a huge negative reaction. The peasants realized more and more that the lords were nothing more than parasites that existed only to consume their labor. They had no intention of giving up the achievements they had achieved during the plague years.

On the other hand, the ruling class could not put up with this state of affairs. Not only did rising wages and falling rents leave them without a livelihood, but the removal of many restrictions and forced labor services from the shoulders of the peasantry threatened not only their estate accounts - it threatened to overturn the entire social order at the top of which they were.

For decades, the ruling nobility has furiously tried to reclaim their profits. In England, the king introduced the Poll Tax in 1377, which was imposed on every adult in the kingdom.

This tax was doubled in 1378 and 1381, placing such a heavy burden on peasant families that many accused the king of trying to restore serfdom. Radical preacher John Wycliffe condemned the tax, stating:

"Thus, the lords eat and drink the flesh and blood of the poor."

In 1381, the peasants in Essex refused to pay the tax, which sparked a peasant revolt. A wealthy peasant named Wat Tyler led an army into London, announcing:

"Kill all the king's lawyers and servants."

Another leader of the uprising, an unemployed priest named John Ball, urged:

"... all to be common, and so that we can all unite together, and so that the lords are not greater masters than we are."

When the rebels reached the Thames at Southwark, the London masses lowered the bridge and helped them take the city. It was an early example of the alliance between the bourgeoisie, urban masses and the peasantry that played such a vital role in the English and French revolutions. Having captured the Tower of London, the rebels beheaded the hated Archbishop of Canterbury.

The rebels then proceeded to plunder the luxurious residences and palaces of the nobility along Fleet Street. But they stole almost nothing from the enormous wealth of their enemies, declaring themselves "zealots of truth and justice, not thieves and robbers". Instead, the furniture and jewelry of the ruling class was thrown into the river or burned to the ground.

Young King Richard II was forced to give in to the demands of the rebels, promising to end serfdom, cheap land and free trade. But as soon as the rebels were satisfied and went home, he ordered them to be interrupted.

Although the uprising itself was ultimately suppressed, serfdom never returned to England.

The end of feudalism


The end of serfdom actually meant the end of feudalism. The old order was dying, but the new order was not yet born. It was a transitional period, "time of monsters"As Gramsci put it. And there have been few things in history as monstrous as the plague.

Events that were amplified and accelerated by the plague continued to transform society throughout the 14th and 15th centuries. The later Middle Ages became the era of the well-to-do independent peasant. Meanwhile, the decrepit feudal nobility continued to exhaust itself in wars.

Gradually, the old feudal dynasties were replaced by a new class of landowners - often merchants who bought their way into the nobility, who were much more focused on making money than on the farcical chivalry of their predecessors.

At the state level, various bureaucratic and clerical functions, which were mainly carried out by priests before the plague, were increasingly taken over by a growing class of educated bourgeois, lawyers, etc.

This new relationship between the feudal monarchy and the urban bourgeoisie only grew stronger as the monarchy became more centralized and depended on the funds of wealthy merchants.

These changes, which took place gradually, eventually gave rise to the absolutist monarchy, which played an important role in the development of capitalism.
52 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    22 October 2021 05: 18
    Modern society and the system, also some kind of catoclysm, is reformatting, this is either the collapse of the dollar system or some kind of new pandemic, this consumer system needs to be changed, resources do not grow like mushrooms.
    1. -8
      22 October 2021 06: 10
      ... this provoked a massive migration of Jews fleeing persecution to the East and, in particular, to Poland

      Why go to Poland, then? Why didn't they go to Israel, to Judea, which, as they say, is 2 thousand years old?

      ... "Thus, the lords eat and drink the flesh and blood of the poor."

      Eh, there were no entanglements then! They would quickly explain that oligarchs are very good people, they provide jobs. But, if the boyars can be blamed for something, then the tsar is definitely white and fluffy!

      The end of serfdom actually meant end of feudalism.

      We have only the beginning of it in Russia. Tsarek announced today that already capitalism has exhausted itself... Apparently hinting at feudalism in Russia. And there is absolutely no alternative to Russian neo-feudalism. Since, according to the same king, Russia has completely exhausted its limits on the revolution!
      1. +4
        22 October 2021 08: 18
        Quote: Stas157
        Why didn't they go to Israel, to Judea,

        Duc, the Zionists will be born only 500 years later (five hundred, Max!) lol
        1. +4
          22 October 2021 09: 09
          Quote: A. Privalov
          Zionists will be born only 500 years later

          But anti-Semites seem to have already been. Judging by the Jewish pogroms that shook the whole of Europe.

          Why do people dislike you so much in different countries and in different centuries? Did they all come to an agreement? Truth. There must be a good reason!
          1. +6
            22 October 2021 10: 27
            Quote: Stas157
            Why do people dislike you so much in different countries and in different centuries? Did they all come to an agreement? Truth. There must be a good reason!

            Why love them? People are newcomers, they dress differently, they pray differently, the male part is completely literate + three or four foreign languages ​​are not uncommon, they keep apart, they drink the blood of Christian babies in barrels, water from taps too, they torture elephants in zoos, etc.
            Anti-Semites are very fond of telling tales about greedy Jewish usurers. However, in reality, it turned out that the local moneylenders were much more greedy and took a higher percentage. But who will love competitors? And the inner enemy is always in place.
            It is true that there were not too many Russophiles in different countries and in different centuries. But here, for no reason, that's for sure.

            1. 0
              22 October 2021 13: 04
              Quote: A. Privalov
              It is true that there were not too many Russophiles in different countries and in different centuries. But here, for no reason, that's for sure.

              So the Russians beat everyone. And they have never been conquered by anyone since the formation of statehood and Muscovy after the Mongols. Therefore, there were reasons. The Muscovite state grew very much in land and eventually grew into the Russian Empire.
              1. +4
                22 October 2021 13: 54
                Quote: Stas157
                So the Russians beat everyone. And they have never been conquered by anyone since the formation of statehood and Muscovy after the Mongols. Therefore, there were reasons. The Muscovite state grew very much in land and eventually grew into the Russian Empire.

                In other words to "the moment of the formation of statehood and the Muscovite kingdom after the Mongols", the Russians did not beat anyone and everyone loved them. And here after from that very moment, it all began. Did I understand your thesis correctly?
                1. 0
                  23 October 2021 06: 37
                  Quote: A. Privalov
                  Did I understand your thesis correctly?

                  No. I think you all get it. You just cling to the wording for some reason.

                  Before the Tatar-Mongol invasion, there was a shattered Russia. Appanage principalities that fought with each other. And after the Mongols, Russia rallied, gained statehood and became invincible. These are facts, but about someone's love or dislike - these are assumptions.
                  1. 0
                    23 October 2021 06: 59
                    Quote: Stas157
                    No. I think you all get it. You just cling to the wording for some reason.

                    For the result to be self-evident: by the time Russophobia arose, although such a word and concept did not yet exist, anti-Semitism was already about 2500 years old. The word "anti-Semitism" will not appear soon either ... hi
                  2. +2
                    25 October 2021 17: 48
                    What, definitely not beaten? Didn't you lose the war to the Poles and Swedes? Was there a beat in the composition of several anti-French coalitions? Didn't you lose the Crimean one? War with Japan in 1905 and 1 World War too?
          2. +4
            22 October 2021 11: 33
            They were not Christians - Catholics. Those. Were strangers.
            We lived apart. And if something bad happened, then everyone knew why. Well, the money was, maybe not all Jews, but. If I am not confusing anything, then before each crusade the future crusaders visited the Jews in order to take away funds for a good cause.
  2. +2
    22 October 2021 05: 21
    Familiar (especially drawings and masks with beaks), but curious ...
    Some of the factors contributing to the spread of epidemics were poor knowledge of the nature of the source.
    Today the picture is different. If mankind has learned to fight against diseases of natural nature, then variants of artificially created viruses triumph. If the pandemic of recent years is not an insidiously conceived response to people for their barbaric activities against the planet ...
    1. +6
      22 October 2021 05: 51
      Exactly, the old woman Earth decided to get rid of us. wink smile
      1. +2
        22 October 2021 05: 57
        old woman Earth decided to get rid of us.

        I think aliens in Earth orbit are experimenting with humanity ... smile regulating its numbers with the help of wars, epidemics, natural disasters ... it’s painfully everything happens naturally.
        1. +4
          22 October 2021 06: 17
          Absolutely! Adversaries harm! bully
  3. -7
    22 October 2021 05: 22
    The article is interesting, although of course there are controversial points. But most importantly, when they talk about a plague pandemic, it was a real pandemic .. So now, it seems like a "pandemic"? Isn't that right? Only now, nowhere are deserted cities visible, corpses lying on the streets and does not carry the smell of decay from the windows of apartments and houses. On the Pokrov he went to the columbarium to the ashes of his parents and for some reason did not see the mass funeral processions, crowds for the funeral service. Pandemic now say, well, well.
    1. +1
      22 October 2021 05: 41
      nowhere to be seen deserted cities, corpses lying on the streets and does not carry the smell of decay from the windows of apartments and houses.

      Like nowhere else ... in the USA there was a moment when the corpses of people who died from Covid could not be immediately buried and they were accumulated in mobile refrigerated morgues right on the street ..
      https://www.vesti.ru/article/2488884
      The pandemic is a bad joke.
    2. +5
      22 October 2021 06: 56
      Pandemic now say, well, well.
      I don't like the example of COVID, look at the Spanish flu pandemic. There you will have the desired number of corpses, funeral processions and other things. Given that this is the 20th century and the level of medicine was significantly higher than in the 14th century.
    3. +8
      22 October 2021 09: 55
      Quote: Snail N9
      The article is interesting, although of course there are controversial points. But most importantly, when they talk about a plague pandemic, it was a real pandemic .. So now, it seems like a "pandemic"? Isn't that right? Only now, nowhere are deserted cities visible, corpses lying on the streets and does not carry the smell of decay from the windows of apartments and houses. On the Pokrov he went to the columbarium to the ashes of his parents and for some reason did not see the mass funeral processions, crowds for the funeral service. Pandemic now say, well, well.

      In general, a pandemic is not "many corpses" but a massive infection.
      1. +4
        22 October 2021 11: 40
        Quote: Pilat2009
        In general, a pandemic is not "many corpses" but a massive infection.

        Well, yes. so in the world every year a flu pandemic and marasmus did not occur as with a new coronavirus.
    4. +4
      22 October 2021 11: 13
      Everyone sees what he wants to see and vice versa ...
    5. +1
      23 October 2021 22: 53
      Quote: Snail N9
      So now, sort of like a "pandemic"? Isn't that right? Only now, nowhere are deserted cities visible, corpses lying on the streets and does not carry the smell of decay from the windows of apartments and houses. On the Pokrov I went to the columbarium to the ashes of my parents and for some reason did not see the mass funeral processions, crowds for the funeral service

      we had 1 ritual in my homeland - now 3 (THREE!). If they bury their relatives in the grave, then the funeral may be delayed until 17-00. It's already dark at this time ...
      They don't have time ...
      In another city there were 4 rituals - now there are 6 offices ...
      On average, before 1 funeral in 1-2 days, now on average 3-4-5 people a day

      There are no processions - everyone is afraid. I buried my mother in August - the neighbors on the street came out to the gates and that's it ...
  4. +8
    22 October 2021 06: 13
    From wiki ... marmots-tarbagans, pikas and other representatives of the orders of rodents and lagomorphs were forced to leave their usual places due to lack of food, provoked by droughts and the increased aridity of the climate, and move closer to human habitation. An epizootic began among the crowded animals; The situation was also complicated by the fact that among the Mongols, marmot meat (it lives in the mountains and steppes, but is absent in the Gobi) is considered a delicacy, marmot fur is also highly valued, and therefore the animals were constantly hunted. In such conditions, infection became inevitable, and the flywheel of the epidemic was launched ...
    1. +3
      22 October 2021 11: 25
      And there was also such a Pallas Peter Simon. In his work such as ... travel to different provinces of the Republic of Ingushetia ... just got stuck from one moment. In the vicinity of Samara, the professor watched gophers / chi hamsters / and concluded that, they say, it would be more convenient to breed them for meat than black rats, as is customary in Italy. Yes his works 1773-1788 ... Now it's dumb for Europeans to remember this ...
    2. +4
      22 October 2021 16: 09
      From life ..., colleague. In 1988, he had the "pleasure" of being in an area where there were 14 deaths from the plague. We immediately closed ourselves with quarantine cordons. It came to the use of weapons. They sat for almost 2 months, they dropped the anti-plague vaccine by helicopters and vaccinated the division in 3 days. There were no refuseniks. Torbagans, Korsakov and others were shot by thousands and immediately burned. There was still that scent in the air. It was in the east of the Central aimag.
    3. +1
      23 October 2021 22: 22
      Quote: parusnik
      marmots-tarbagans, pikas and other representatives of the orders of rodents and lagomorphs were forced to leave their usual places due to lack of food provoked by droughts and increased climate aridity

      Yes, in those pandemics there is definitely a natural climatic component, in addition to the socio-economic and political ones given in the article.
  5. +3
    22 October 2021 06: 23
    The author did not indicate how the Justinian plague was defeated.
    Did it "dissolve" itself?
    What makes plague and Covid related. The plague stick was relatively harmless to humans and can be classified as conditionally pathogenic, but it mutated somewhere 5-6 thousand years ago and became what it became.
    Natural foci remained and the plague did not go anywhere.
    There are more than 10 anti-plague stations in the Russian Federation.
    Maybe fuck it!
    1. -1
      22 October 2021 06: 31
      To me, too, they compared the plague and the corona, the mortality rate from which is no higher than the mortality rate from the usual flu.
      1. +6
        22 October 2021 06: 47
        Read carefully. I didn't even write a word about mortality. And compared the changes that occurred in the genome
      2. +2
        23 October 2021 11: 18
        Quote: Chekmarev
        To me, too, they compared the plague and the corona, the mortality rate from which is no higher than the mortality rate from the usual flu.

        mortality from influenza 0.1. From the crown from 1 to 5 percent.
        1. +1
          23 October 2021 11: 25
          Quote: Dartik
          mortality from influenza 0.1. From the crown from 1 to 5 percent.

          Where do these numbers come from?
          From the coronavirus disease COVID-19, 4953505 people died (+8237 per day), about 244 million were infected, about 18 million are currently infected, more than 220 million of those infected have been recognized as recovered. Average mortality: 2%.
          1. +1
            23 October 2021 11: 27
            Quote: atalef
            Average mortality: 2%.

            answer in your quote. From 1 to 5 - depending on the country, the distribution of the stamp. Although there are covid ones with a mortality rate of 10 percent, fortunately they are less infectious.
            1. 0
              23 October 2021 11: 41
              Quote: Dartik
              Quote: atalef
              Average mortality: 2%.

              answer in your quote. From 1 to 5 - depending on the country, the distribution of the stamp. Although there are covid ones with a mortality rate of 10 percent, fortunately they are less infectious.

              The lctality is even less than 2%, because there is a huge number of asymptomatic patients who have not even been included in the statistics
              1. +1
                23 October 2021 13: 38
                Quote: atalef
                Quote: Dartik
                Quote: atalef
                Average mortality: 2%.

                answer in your quote. From 1 to 5 - depending on the country, the distribution of the stamp. Although there are covid ones with a mortality rate of 10 percent, fortunately they are less infectious.

                The lctality is even less than 2%, because there is a huge number of asymptomatic patients who have not even been included in the statistics

                Well, yes, but many mortality associated with coronavirus is not taken into account, because it exacerbates chronic disease and a person may die after a month, but they will not be recorded from the corona. Although she called. Official figures are 2-5 percent.
    2. +1
      22 October 2021 23: 39
      About Justinian's plague, it is not known for certain whether it was exactly the plague, and not something else
  6. +5
    22 October 2021 07: 24
    Almost disappearing in the Dark Ages, internal trade within Europe began to revive along with medieval cities and an emerging bourgeoisie.

    Again the author undertook to write off without knowing the issue, replicating greasy anecdotes about the "dark ages".
    The topic of the importance of biological factors for understanding the process of development of human communities, which the author swung to, he failed to reveal.
  7. +5
    22 October 2021 07: 45
    In fact, it is not talking about all of Europe, but only about England.
  8. +6
    22 October 2021 07: 47
    Importantly, the author showed the connection between the plague and the changes in society that led to the Renaissance and to the mobile workforce that later became the basis of the bourgeois revolution. And the article is not a scientific work, the volume is not the same, so I will not send a reproach to the author for incompleteness.
  9. +2
    22 October 2021 07: 59
    Even then, the Jews were to blame laughing
  10. +3
    22 October 2021 08: 08
    It is believed that the plague first appeared in the Gobi Desert in the 1320s.
    In a secret American laboratory and later dispersed by Mongol traders and horsemen throughout Eurasia on instructions from the CIA, she came to China in the 1330s and killed about a quarter of the population. laughing An interesting way from Europe to China. laughing
  11. +4
    22 October 2021 08: 21
    an unemployed priest named John Ball
    It was a wandering priest without a parish, a wandering and unemployed two big differences. Ball was in conflict with the official church, was excommunicated, was periodically imprisoned.
    1. +1
      22 October 2021 17: 29
      And not a job for a priest, but a service.
  12. +5
    22 October 2021 08: 37
    Young King Richard II was forced to give in to the demands of the rebels, promising to end serfdom, cheap land and free trade. But as soon as the rebels were satisfied and went home, he ordered them to be interrupted.
    Nooo it was not so. Wat Tyler. He lived in Colchester and was a roofer. Member of the Hundred Years War. Tyler fought in France, where he gained military experience. It was he who formulated the program of the dissatisfied:
    1. Loyalty to King Richard.
    2. Fight against John of Gaunt - a powerful feudal lord and founder of the Lancaster dynasty.
    3. Cancellation of all levies from the working people, with the exception of fifteen (tax in the amount of 1/15 of income).
    4. Willingness to fight to the end for the achievement of these goals.
    The authorities of the capital gathered their own militia from loyal townspeople and dispersed the rioters. The uprising was still going on in the provinces, but the strategic initiative was already in the hands of the government. By autumn, the unrest was finally suppressed. John Ball was taken prisoner at Coventry and then quartered. In total, about 7 thousand people died in battles or on the block and gallows.
    Although the uprising itself was ultimately suppressed, serfdom never returned to England.

    Corvée was replaced by money rent, the bond of serfs with the land was severed. And there was no one to "strengthen" after the plague. The surviving peasants calmly left their owner and went to another, whose affairs were also not in the best way, there were not enough workers.
  13. +2
    22 October 2021 13: 30
    What is not so well known is that the arrival of the plague in the 14th century was actually the second time that plague has visited Europe. First pandemic hit the Eastern Roman Empire in the 6th century

    Researchers discovered a 5000-year-old plague strain during excavations in Latvia. 5000 years ago, a rodent bit a 20-year-old Stone Age hunter-gatherer.
  14. 0
    22 October 2021 15: 05
    The capitalist system is coming to an end, the life cycle is coming to an end. But the system does not want to lose power and reform through a revolution or war, it does not want to. And what if you change the rules of the game in the course of the play, all the more remains of influence still exist. I'm sure not random) rewrite the rules and assign resources.
    Who was there among the Chinese used to say: God forbid you to live in an era of change!
    These changes are also not accidental.
  15. dda
    +5
    22 October 2021 17: 06
    I honestly admit that the article did not hook me. I have been doing research on this issue on a professional level for 10 years. I really see the influence of old English works. Although one must pay tribute to the English historians of the 20th century - many written sources of the Middle Ages were raised and analyzed. However, after Ulyam McNeill, it is necessary to give a slightly different analysis of the ongoing processes of the Late Middle Ages. The author tried to use the theses of the French school of the Annals about the long crisis of the Middle Ages. But the whole evidence base is built around the English data, which is not entirely correct in relation to France. Where the social base of society is different and the political system is different. Therefore, drawing conclusions based solely on several works will obviously be temporarily before. Therefore, it was logical to designate the title of the article "The Transformation of England in the Conditions of the Black Death". But unfortunately, the factor of the Scarlet and White roses and the subsequent arrival of the Tudors with fencing are practically not taken into account. Advice to the author - for a better understanding of the topic, refer to the work of Ulyam McKneill, "Epidemics and Peoples", translated into Russian. At least there is a sample of data on China.
    1. +2
      22 October 2021 21: 41
      If the author read your comment, he would be terribly surprised, since he does not even suspect that he is familiar with such things as the school of the Annals.
  16. -1
    22 October 2021 18: 08
    high school students' essays are even more interesting.
  17. 0
    22 October 2021 22: 25
    Only one thing is not clear. If in other countries with developed capitalism the corona is a virus, then in the countries of feudalism there is a corona plague, or what? It is immediately written that if there is a disintegration of feudalism, then a plague begins. So, how is the crown now, the crown plague, or the crown plague? Completely confused. Do different countries get sick in different ways?
  18. 0
    30 November 2021 15: 23
    Cognitively, thanks for the insight into history good
  19. -2
    27 December 2021 09: 42
    Russia has not yet crawled out of feudalism.
  20. The comment was deleted.
  21. AML
    0
    15 January 2022 19: 39
    Quote: atalef
    Quote: Dartik
    mortality from influenza 0.1. From the crown from 1 to 5 percent.

    Where do these numbers come from?
    From the coronavirus disease COVID-19, 4953505 people died (+8237 per day), about 244 million were infected, about 18 million are currently infected, more than 220 million of those infected have been recognized as recovered. Average mortality: 2%.

    Where have seasonal diseases gone? Where did the regular flu go?
    Below I wrote that 4 people have recently died of covid in our country. The average age is 76 years.

    And yes, not 3 but 4 vaccinations have already been approved in Europe
    If you didn’t manage to make a booster on time (3), then the first 2 do not count. And yes, in Europe, an antibody test does not matter. Even if the covid dies just by looking at you, then still be kind enough to inject yourself.

    It looks like we are being bullied.