Leonardo da Vinci is an artist, thinker and revolutionary. Da Vinci's world

33

Renaissance


В stories of humanity there are periods that represent fundamental turning points. Such periods are characterized by great social, political and cultural transformations. Ideas, habits and traditions that have indisputably been adopted for centuries or even millennia are suddenly questioned. Society is in a state of fermentation, which also affects the minds of men and women. A lifestyle that has become old and decrepit is beginning to stagger. Although people do not understand what is happening, everyone senses that fundamental change is approaching. Such a period of social upheaval is inevitably reflected in profound changes in religion, philosophy and art.

The sixteenth century was marked by the culmination of the expansion of the power of the bourgeoisie during one of the most remarkable periods in human history. The Renaissance brought about an extraordinary flourishing of culture, art and science. Never before or since has the world seen such a gallery of heroes and geniuses. To this day, the works of art from this unique period of history remain unsurpassed. He set the standard by which artistic achievement is measured throughout history.



Engels describes the Renaissance as follows:

“It was the greatest progressive revolution that humanity has experienced so far, a time that demanded giants and gave birth to giants - giants in power of thought, passion and character, in universality and learning. The people who founded modern bourgeois rule had anything but bourgeois restraints. On the contrary, the adventurous nature of the time inspired them to a greater or lesser extent. It is unlikely that at that time there was at least one important person who would travel a lot, did not speak four or five languages, did not shine in a number of areas. Leonardo da Vinci was not only a great artist, but also a great mathematician, mechanic and engineer, to whom the most diverse fields of physics owe important discoveries. Albrecht Dürer was a painter, engraver, sculptor and architect and, in addition, invented a fortification system that embodied many ideas that were much later taken up again by Montalembert and the modern German science of fortification. Machiavelli was a statesman, historian, poet and at the same time the first notable military author of modern times. Luther not only cleansed the Augean stables of the Church, but also the German language; he created modern German prose and composed the lyrics and melody of that triumphal anthem, imbued with confidence of victory, which became the Marseillaise of the sixteenth century. "

The roots of this extraordinary period are to be found in the second half of the fifteenth century, when the prolonged decline of feudalism in Western Europe led to the emergence of the great absolute monarchies that anticipated modern European nation states. Relying on the burghers in the cities, the absolute monarchies managed to break the power of the old feudal nobility. The bourgeoisie used their leverage to get concessions from the central government in the form of charters and royal privileges. Here, in general terms, we already see the rapid ambition and growing power of the bourgeoisie, which ultimately led to the overthrow of the monarchies in England and France.

Art and the rise of the bourgeoisie


The young bourgeoisie hastened to throw off the rags of feudalism. She readily embraced new ideas, new philosophies, new science and new art forms. At present, the connection between the rise of the bourgeoisie and the struggle against the dominant ideology of the Roman Catholic Church is clear to everyone. The struggle between hostile classes was reflected in the struggle between rival religions, which found expression in what we call the Reformation, the Dutch and English revolutions, and the religious wars that raged in Europe throughout the 17th century.

With the decline of feudalism and the rise of the bourgeoisie, new artistic and literary forms began to appear. They originated in the wealthy Flemish city-states with their new class of wealthy merchants. The new methods of capitalist production found their expression in art.

The new style of art included revolutionary techniques of great complexity, which allowed the artist to depict previously unseen details - the golden thread on the dress, the folds of the cloak, the shine of the sun's rays on the armor, the reflection in the polished mirror, which create special technical difficulties. Contemporary British artist David Hockney believes that these artists used techniques developed from recent scientific discoveries in optics to achieve an almost photographic quality and realism.

The new style was also associated with a new spirit of invention, the study of proportions and anatomy, the invention of new colors and, above all, the discovery of perspective. A mathematical perspective of the Renaissance type was unknown in the Middle Ages. Before the Renaissance, God the Father was portrayed much larger than human figures, thereby emphasizing the insignificance of man in relation to the Almighty. But in the Renaissance, this art form was destroyed.

The conflict between the nascent bourgeoisie and the Church — the central conflict throughout the entire dawn of capitalism — was driven in part by the fact that the Church provided the primary moral and religious underpinning for the existing feudal order.

This was the period when the bourgeoisie played a progressive role, fighting to free itself from the fetters of feudalism that impeded its development. The idea of ​​freedom began to form in the imagination of people: first of all, freedom from the dead hand of religion and the church, which ultimately led to Luther and the Reformation.

Renaissance Italy


The enormous wealth of cities such as Florence, Genoa, Milan and Venice, with their powerful ruling families of princes-merchants, created the objective conditions for the flourishing of art, which has no analogues since ancient times.

In this seething crucible of intellectual life, new schools of art arose. From these schools comes a galaxy of giants: Titian, Michelangelo, Raphael and, towering over all of them, Leonardo da Vinci.

But not a single fine art. Literature kept up with him. The change in it was the figure of Dante Alighieri, who can be considered as the last writer of the Middle Ages and the first writer of the modern era. Petrarch and Boccaccio were, along with Dante, the greatest literary figures of this period. In Boccaccio's Decameron, we see the beginnings of a modern novel.

Another genius of the time was Machiavelli. His reputation as an unscrupulous schemer is completely underestimated. In fact, he was a great scientist and thinker of the Renaissance. His History of Florence (which Marx greatly admired) is a masterpiece of historical science. She accurately describes the brutal class struggle that was raging in the Italian city-states at the time. Machiavelli was the first writer who gave a scientific analysis of the state, devoid of all moralistic and idealistic adornments, and revealed its essence as weapons.

The new art is closely linked with the rise of the bourgeoisie. And with the rise of the bourgeoisie, we see the growth of individualism in art. The Renaissance is an age of individualism, the bold assertion of human rights.

Until now, the true object of art has been God, not man. But just as Copernicus and Galileo "made the world revolve around the sun," so the humanistic worldview of the Renaissance made art revolve around real people. This would have been unthinkable in the medieval period.

It is no coincidence that Italy played such an outstanding role in the formation of the Renaissance. Italy (along with the Netherlands) was the birthplace of capitalism. In the cities of northern and central Italy, the nascent bourgeoisie was already flexing its muscles and gaining a voice of its own, becoming more and more assertive.

The first manifestations of capitalism can be seen in Italy in the 13th and 14th centuries. These centuries were accompanied by the most grandiose burst of artistic creativity. The rise of the Italian bourgeoisie was expressed in the creation of a number of independent city-states. In the absence of a strong central monarchy, the burghers of Florence, Milan, Genoa, and other prosperous cities created city-states that balanced between emperor and pope.

However, there was a problem that ultimately slowed down the development of capitalism in Italy. Lack of national unity and sharp divisions between the city-states contributed to the constant intervention of foreign powers. Already in the Middle Ages, Italian politics was characterized by a struggle between two opposing groups - the Guelphs and the Ghibellines, the former supported the papacy, the latter supported the German emperors.

This contributed to chronic strife in the cities of northern Italy throughout the 13th and 14th centuries. As a result, Italy has been a battleground for centuries where the French, German and Spanish armies fought bloody wars to gain control of the country's wealth. The resulting disagreements made it impossible for Italy to develop as a single nation-state. Thus, the full potential of early capitalist development was wasted as a result of internecine conflicts, wars and factional strife.

Leonardo da Vinci and his time


Leonardo was a Renaissance man par excellence. More than anyone else, Leonardo was responsible for taking painting to the next level and making a true artistic revolution.

Speaking about both Leonardo himself and dozens of other people of that time, Engels wrote the following lines:

“... The heroes of that time had not yet fallen into the slavery of the division of labor, the restrictive consequences of which, with its one-sidedness, we so often see in their successors. But what is especially characteristic of them is that they almost all live in the very midst of the interests of their time, taking an active part in practical struggle, take the side of one party or another and fight some with a word and a pen, some with a sword, and some with both together. Hence the fullness and strength of character that make them whole people. "

His fiercely inquiring mind "turned" in one direction or the other in search of solutions to the problems of art and science, and in this he reflected the whole spirit of his age. But at the very moment when he solved one problem, he seemed to lose interest in it and went in search of others. For this reason, he often left projects unfinished and spent a lot of time starting new ones (for example, it took him four years to complete the Mona Lisa). In other cases, he simply left the paintings to his students to finish for him. As if he lacked the worlds he could conquer, and lacked the lives he could live.

He was an architect and engineer who planned to build tunnels in the mountains and connect rivers through canals. He anticipated Copernicus's theory of the movement of the Earth and Lamarck's classification of animals into vertebrates and invertebrates. He discovered the laws of optics, gravity, heat and light. He was obsessed with flying birds and spent a lot of time researching the possibility of creating a flying machine.

Among his many drawings, we find one that depicts a helicopter. In addition, he developed the tank and parachute, several centuries before these items found their central application on the battlefields of World War II. He also developed a dialectical philosophy in which will was considered the energy of life, and this adequately reflects the inner meaning of his own life, which has achieved much more than ordinary people could achieve.

However, it is remarkable that the true genius of Leonardo really began to be understood only in our time.
33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    21 October 2021 18: 13
    It's great, but not for the "Military Review", Leonardo worked in the field of weapons, an article on this topic would be quite appropriate, and there is nothing new, a textbook of the 6th grade of the Soviet school.
    1. +12
      21 October 2021 18: 33
      I agree that the note is too small.
      Leonardo da Vinci was not only a great artist, but also a great mathematician, mechanic and engineer, to whom the most diverse fields of physics owe important discoveries.

      Engels, of course, is a great authority, only I would like to know more about Leonardo's discoveries in the field of physics (which appeared almost 100 years after him) as well as mathematics, which was already in his time.
      He anticipated Copernicus' theory of the movement of the Earth

      Well, the heliocentric system was first formulated by Aristarchus of Samos in the 3rd century BC. NS.
      He discovered the laws of optics, gravity, heat and light.

      Here, too, I would like to learn more.
      In reality, Leonardo was a great artist, and his projects were promoted during the struggle for the unification of Italy. It was necessary to show that "the Italian land can give birth to its own Platons and quick-witted Newtons" - a political order, no more. The comment is not inserted directly under the note again, so I wrote it in the form of such an addition.
    2. +2
      21 October 2021 19: 51
      -Leonardo da Vinci and his time
      The era of GREAT names.
  2. Cat
    +2
    21 October 2021 18: 13
    However, it is remarkable that the true genius of Leonardo really began to be understood only in our time.

    Who does the author mean by this? Is it really the Mask? what
  3. +7
    21 October 2021 18: 18
    Thought an article about Da Vinci ...
  4. +7
    21 October 2021 18: 20
    Culture News.
    Found the lower part of the painting by Leonardo da Vinci "La Gioconda". Now have
    experts left no doubt that in the picture the artist
    portrayed himself.
    1. +9
      21 October 2021 18: 35
      Who knows ... Who knows ... "There are many things in the world, Friend of Horatio ..." (c) smile


      Good evening, Alexander. hi
      1. +4
        21 October 2021 19: 15
        Quote: Sea Cat
        Who knows ... Who knows ... "There are many things in the world, Friend of Horatio ..." (c)

        Greetings!
        Seriously, he was definitely a cool guy. Possessor of versatile abilities and knowledge, in many ways he was ahead of his era.
        1. +3
          21 October 2021 19: 17
          That's right, his one "tank" is worth something. smile
          1. +3
            21 October 2021 19: 21
            Quote: Sea Cat
            That's right, his one "tank" is worth something. smile

            In our area, in one of the museums, a large exhibition of models of mechanisms invented by Leonardo was once held. It was summer vacation and I took the kids there. So, I was more impressed. Such mechanics have always amazed me.
            1. +1
              21 October 2021 19: 33
              I envy, I've only seen in reproductions. request
            2. +6
              21 October 2021 21: 11
              Quote: A. Privalov
              a large exhibition of models of mechanisms invented by Leonardo.

              The story of the "technical genius" Leonardo is greatly exaggerated (promoted)! ...
              Of course Leonardo da Vinci was a genius, a gifted, talented, versatile person, but it seems to me that if you think carefully about Leonardo's work, it turns out that his genius is still somewhat exaggerated. And the people of the modern era exaggerated it! They looked at the propeller and exclaimed: "Yo-mine! Leo invented the helicopter!" ... they saw a diving suit: "Wow! Divers-saboteurs could be in the 16th century!" Of course, it all looked intriguing! But what at that time was actually "drawn" in Leonardo's head - the "banana" knows him! While other inventors designed specific objects, made prototypes, eliminated flaws, conducted tests, made samples again, carried out serious, often many years of work before realizing their idea; at this time Leonardo was only fond of sketches (" pictures "): one finished, another started. Perhaps this was his addicting nature, perhaps he was overwhelmed by many thoughts, he was bored of painstakingly struggling to bring to mind one idea, if a new one was knocking on his head ... but ... he did not create anything practically usable!
              1. +2
                22 October 2021 00: 27
                Quote: Nikolaevich I
                The story of the "technical genius" Leonardo is greatly exaggerated (promoted)! ...

                Perhaps. However, today it is easy to criticize a self-taught inventor from the height of knowledge, discoveries and technologies collected over the 500 (five hundred!) Years that have passed since his time.
                But do not forget that he was also a "universal person" - an artist-painter, sculptor, architect and natural scientist, anatomist, writer and musician. Moreover, in each of these activities, he succeeded.
                Leonardo da Vinci recorded all his observations in a notebook that he always carried with him. The result was a kind of intimate diary, the likes of which is not found in the entire world literature. Drawings, drawings and sketches are accompanied here by short notes on perspective, architecture, music, natural history, military engineering, and the like; all this is interspersed with various sayings, philosophical reasoning, allegories, anecdotes, fables. Taken together, the records of these 120 books represent materials for an extensive encyclopedia. However, he did not seek to publish his thoughts and even resorted to secret writing, a complete transcript of his notes has not been completed so far.
      2. +2
        21 October 2021 20: 40
        Konstantin! Where do you get all this from? request It's dangerous to quarrel with you! stop And then suddenly you will find yourself on VO in some kind of "piquant" form! ...

        And then you have to react!
        1. +1
          21 October 2021 21: 26
          And then you have to react!


          "For any of your questions ..." (c)

          With a hatchet somehow not very good. smile And why should we quarrel, it is better to crush on an eggplant. drinks
          1. +1
            21 October 2021 22: 15
            Convinced! I would say right away about Maxim's friend! Who will quarrel with Maxim? No. On an eggplant? Well then, to the barrier! Make your choice, sir!


            1. +1
              21 October 2021 22: 19
              Make your choice, sir!


              "Your word, comrade Mauser!" (C) drinks drinks good
  5. +2
    21 October 2021 18: 43
    However, it is remarkable that the true genius of Leonardo really began to be understood only in our time.

    Finally! Hooray! We've been waiting for this! It is finished! VO recognized Leonardo as a genius.
    This is an unconditional victory for all progressive humanity.
    You can assess the greatness and historical and cultural value of this article only by quoting a great scientist in the field of natural science:
    "This thing is stronger than" Faust "Goethe
    1. +6
      21 October 2021 19: 08
      "This thing is stronger than" Faust "Goethe laughing good
  6. +6
    21 October 2021 18: 44
    I have not read the article, only the title (Painfully familiar). The author is Zyryanov? Who read, tell me, is the review article? About Leonardo our da Vinci a couple of lines? Like what came up with, but probably about the portrait of Mona Lisa? If yes, therefore, I do not remember the source of this article as a child, but probably the DE edition of the 60s, I remember this, in the reading room there was our regional library. In the new edition of DE (70-80s), more is written about Leonardo in different volumes. smile
    1. +3
      21 October 2021 19: 13
      library-library .. Excuse me, confusion, annoying.
      1. +4
        21 October 2021 20: 10
        Yes, yes, but not whether US will swing at our, Leonard, so to speak Da Vinci ?!
        1. +7
          21 October 2021 20: 15
          To paraphrase:
          - Whom did we not read on the Military Review in the History section! Better not to remember. smile
  7. +6
    21 October 2021 20: 25
    In fact, such titans as Leonardo did not give rise to the Renaissance in art, it was the Renaissance in art that was the product of the onset of the era of mass production, requiring the introduction of new production techniques in the process of creating an industrial product.
    Elements of capitalism as we understand it began to emerge in Europe as early as the 12th century. Hence - the gradually growing need for theoretical scientists - mathematicians, physicists, chemists, and others. In parallel - in the developers of new technology, engineers, and even further - in a huge amount of skilled labor, the role of which was to be played by the common people. The nascent class of capitalists could not satisfy the need of their industries for scientists and engineers that periodically emerged among the enlightened feudal elite. And even more so - the need for professional workers. And even then, the "raznochintsy" - the intelligentsia of the small landed nobles, the lower merchant and other classes of the same class - began to be recruited into science. In this regard, the role of the lower estates began to grow, and with this, the role of the mass man as a creator. Talent became the main thing, not the social stratum to which its owner belonged. And talent is characterized by a lack of blinkering, despite official prohibitions - especially in that era of unplowed scientific field. But in those days the field was not plowed in both literature and art! Feeling the fresh wind of change, poets, writers, painters, sculptors, architects and composers responded to their senses. As a result, despite the discontent of the churches, communities of the intelligentsia began to form in the cities, developing a variety of areas of science, technology, literature and art. These people talked! They knew each other, they often got together, and each infected the others with his own interests. This is how a self-sustaining system of cognition and mastering of new things arose, often no longer requiring investment from the customer-capitalist. It was like an explosive process stretched out over time. One that could not be stopped by any forces. And there was so much charm in this movement to the new that talented people eagerly tried to master the many directions that were opening before them. This is where titans like Leonardo and Durer come from.

    Something similar was observed at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries.
    1. +5
      21 October 2021 21: 36
      He also developed a dialectical philosophy in which will was considered the energy of life, and this adequately reflects the inner meaning of his own life, which has achieved much more than ordinary people could achieve.

      The author obviously set himself a goal - to write only about what he does not understand at all. And he pursues this goal with amazing tenacity.
      The question arises, if a person has such stubbornness, not even stubbornness, but stubbornness in achieving the goal, which prevents from directing at least part of this stubbornness to studying the issue about which the author is going to write? That's real - why?
      1. +2
        21 October 2021 22: 02
        In general, if I was engaged in writing articles professionally, that is, for money, I would, without splattering, take one direction and carefully study it - to such a level of mastery of the material, when the ability arises easily, "in my own words", as demanded at school, to present not just events and facts, but also to give the narrated an author's flavor. That is, passing remarks, conclusions, own attitude.
        However, there is a danger.
        This takes a lot of time and effort. It's like studying at an institute. And writing an author's article is work. And then - bam! And the topic is not in demand. And you have to live on something! It means to dive into the new, perhaps with the same success. I don’t think you can earn a lot by writing articles. But there are times when writing articles is the only way out.
        1. +3
          21 October 2021 22: 16
          We are not talking about professional writing articles, but about writing articles for a network resource, in particular - the site "VO". This is not a refereed publication, where reviewers, by the way, can protect the reader from copyright errors and falsifications.
          Therefore, the set of requirements here is much more modest and the main thing is not to write complete nonsense, as the author performs with the methodical metronome.
          Even for this article. Okay, suppose Grothe H., Leonardo da Vinci als Ingenieur und Philosoph is not available to the author, but Dityakin's book, published by the Soviet Detgiz, or Jessica Taish, Tracy Barr. Leonardo da Vinci for "dummies", after all, the author could master. This does not take much time and effort. Day maximum, with tea and sandwiches on a comfortable sofa.
          1. +3
            21 October 2021 22: 34
            Ooooh! I had such or a similar book about Leonardo in my childhood, I still remember it. Here, they recalled)))
            But, apparently, the Author tried to fit Leonardo into the era as a typical case. In my opinion, it partly worked out. Only the era needed to be defined more clearly and concisely, why did it suddenly arise, why on earth the bourgeoisie suddenly began to resist the feudal lords. We lived peacefully, got along, and suddenly there was a confrontation! And only then, how and why did Leonardo correspond to the era, how he participated in its promotion, without knowing it himself.
            1. +2
              21 October 2021 23: 18
              But, apparently, the Author tried to write

              I have not noticed the author's ability to independently "fit" someone into something. Most likely, the author rewrote something somewhere, but due to a complete lack of knowledge, he did not cope with the task.
            2. +2
              22 October 2021 00: 38
              Good night, Lyudmila Yakovlevna!

              Apparently, the Author tried to fit Leonardo into the era as a typical case. In my opinion, it partly worked out.

              Yes, it seems to be an article that Da Vinci's World = Renaissance = Progress. But the part that did not work out, for some reason is saturated with a strange spirit, emanates from the text an ode to the bourgeoisie and capitalism.

              Or was it a weather cataclysm that inspired such a perception?

              Best regards,
              Michael
  8. Fat
    +5
    21 October 2021 21: 50
    hi Zyryanov writes about Da Vinci in an unusually, unimaginably boring ... What nafik is the 16th century? This is the era of the Quattrocento! ... There is Tuscany, Florence, the Medici family in conflict with Pope Sixtus IV ... Urban coups and the conspiracy of the Pazzi family ...
    Ottoman invasion of Italy and fall of Otranto ...
    Pope Alexander VI (Rodrigo Borgia) and his Sacred League (Venetsan)
    The Italian War of 1494, or the Italian War of Charles VIII, was the beginning of a whole series of Italian Wars.
    And in this period, Leonardo was in the service of Lorenzo magnificent, as an artist and military engineer!
    Author! Leonardo of Vinci was born in 1452, died in 1519 ... in France ...
    And not only did you mix up the periods (centuries), you also fastened Marxism unsuccessfully and told little about Da Vinci ...
    The article simply amazes with its unicellular primitiveness ... fellow
    1. +2
      22 October 2021 00: 31
      The main thing is that the author, in his article, highlighted the point of view of uv. Comrade Engels, you know. And what about this davinchi, don't davinchi ...
  9. 0
    23 October 2021 03: 53
    Wherever you spit - everything was invented by da Vinci. I do not believe. And how long. It doesn't work like that.
    Although I do not like any alternative stories. Most likely, he simply documented the accumulated experience in his papers. And they survived. In architecture - yes, but in painting - well ... not Michelangelo. It is enough to collect his pictures in a heap. 90% regular stamping.
    A talented man of his time, but too much pulled on him. It seems to me.