The Chinese command is guided by the concept: "Who controls space - controls the Earth" - from a report in the United States

30

They test anti-satellite missiles and leave a mass of dangerous debris in orbit. They use cybernetic weapon on earth, then to subdue the sky with it. They see their goal in the development and implementation of high-tech means of delivering military strikes from orbital positions. They see space as a future war zone and want to establish their strategic advantage there. And they are all Chinese "militarists". Such conclusions were made in a fresh report of the US Air Force analysts, which were diligently retold by the journalists of The Washington Times.

The experts' report is based on an overview of the activities of the Chinese National Institute of Aerospace Research, partially (according to the American side) integrated into aviation and space programs. In parallel with the development of missile weapons in the PRC, the corresponding cybernetic resources are being improved, designed to ensure the uninterrupted and efficient operation of all elements of the system, be it command centers, defensive echelons or attacking echelons.



What else has China been guilty of - in addition to testing a satellite destroyer rocket, which allegedly left about three and a half thousand fragments in orbit? Now the debris of the meteorological probe will revolve around the Earth for years, posing a danger to the operation of other objects, although this is far from the only "garbage" left by the Chinese conquerors of airless space. However, the main concern should be caused not so much by the actions being taken today - as by China's intentions and ambitions to achieve a leading position in space.

Reporters from the US Air Force believe that the People's Liberation Army of China (PLA) is forming units capable of purposefully seizing strategic bridgeheads in a conflict according to a "space" scenario. Weaken the enemy and block his access to orbit: the main functions of reconnaissance, observation and communication systems are subordinated to this general task.


According to the authors of the report, the Chinese command is guided by the concept "Who controls space - controls the Earth." Whether under this slogan is meant a specific program of China for the exploration of the moon, American analysts did not specify. But they made a prediction with confidence: China will try more and more actively to show its military space potential and to show its ambitions to conquer leadership in space. It is possible that for the sake of this, Beijing will risk going to acts of demonstration of force far beyond its borders.
  • Nikolay Stalnov
  • The website of the National Space Administration of the People's Republic of China cnsa.gov.cn
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -1
    15 October 2021 10: 09
    China will try more and more actively to show its military space potential and to show its ambitions to gain leadership in space. It is possible that for the sake of this, Beijing will risk to go to acts of demonstration of force far beyond its borders.

    Somewhere in the suburbs of these words, a journalist choked on a fat cheburek. Now he will be poked with his face in the successes of the Chinese astronautics. And he believed that no one would notice the successful landing of the Chinese rover.
    1. +3
      15 October 2021 10: 13
      Quote: Civil
      Somewhere in the suburbs of these words, a journalist choked on a fat cheburek. Now he will be poked with his face in the successes of the Chinese astronautics. And he believed that no one would notice the successful landing of the Chinese rover.

      Amazing comment !!! good drinks
      Also, the journalists did not notice the space exhibition held in China, at which it became quite obvious that success in space directly depends on success in the economy.
      1. 0
        15 October 2021 10: 36
        Also, the journalists did not notice the space exhibition held in China, at which it became quite obvious that success in space directly depends on success in the economy.

        Oh, it's dangerous to notice such things! That is why they are silent! But when Ukraine sets its flag on the moon ....))) ....))) then they will notice!
        1. -4
          15 October 2021 10: 53
          Quote: Egoza
          Oh, it's dangerous to notice such things! That is why they are silent! But when Ukraine sets its flag on the moon ....))) ....))) then they will notice!

          In the heroic battles forcing Geyropa and other decaying world to buy our gas and for world domination in the laying of transatlantic pipelines, the uryaputically minded part of fellow citizens somehow missed that the Chinese orbital station Tiangong was already spinning over their heads, and the Chinese lunar mission would provide communications for American ships while in lunar orbit.
        2. +1
          15 October 2021 12: 58
          Quote: Egoza
          But when Ukraine sets its flag on the moon ....))) ....))) then they will notice!

          Ukraine will undoubtedly plant its flag on the moon, but by that time, China's pennants will be on the planets of other star systems.
    2. +2
      15 October 2021 12: 11
      Quote: Civil
      Somewhere in the suburbs of these words, a journalist choked on a fat cheburek.


      "journalist" has just sent another 36 commercial satellites into space with broadband internet



      the next step is to send the truck to the ISS in a couple of weeks



      routine, 68 successful launches in a row with him, and since his inauguration, our rockets have launched 447 spacecraft for various purposes - scientific and applied, both domestic and foreign.

      Surprising just the same knurled whining of some on the forum in his address laughing
      1. +2
        15 October 2021 13: 03
        Well, in terms of successful launches, Elon Musk has already outclassed everyone .. including such a "minor success" as the same return stage that flew into space 11 times (!!!) ..
        1. -1
          15 October 2021 13: 15
          Quote: Dikson
          Well on successful launches Elon Musk


          Yes, it does not matter who is there and who beat him, feverishly trying to work off the Pentagon's money on the same vehicles, littering low near-earth space. The main thing is that we regularly launch various spacecraft, and from next year we begin to deploy large constellations of applied satellites of the Sphere project.
          1. +2
            15 October 2021 13: 24
            That is, they "litter", and we will "deploy large constellations of satellites." littering the near-Earth territory for the sake of Hype and the excitement .. We were arguing just now for a rocket in a Khokhloma coloring, you said that there is no such thing .. but in fact - there is it, my dear .. painted already ..))) Again, forgive 11 launches the same level, instead of 11 new products - it's not your cat who shit in your slippers .. You count the money ..
            1. +1
              15 October 2021 13: 36
              Quote: Dikson
              That is, they "litter", and we will "deploy large constellations of satellites" ..


              Our groupings are smaller in the number of spacecraft and are more efficient, since they are of different caliber in applied tasks. Unlike....



              Quote: Dikson
              Well, why are you so ..


              It's a shame, yes? laughing

              Quote: Dikson
              We were arguing here just now for a rocket painted in Khokhloma, you said that there is no such thing .. but in fact - there is it, my dear .. painted already ..)))


              Trolling 800 leveled laughing Just lead the truck to the ISS. And they did not paint it, but pasted stickers with graphics - everyone does it. In honor of the 800th anniversary of Nizhny Novgorod. A good tradition has emerged.

              Quote: Dikson
              Again, forgive 11 launches of the same stage, instead of 11 new products - it's not your cat who shit in a slipper .. You count your money ..


              We have already calculated - to produce the first and second stages of the Soyuz-2, for the number of spacecraft that we launch cheaper than the cost of a used first stage of the F9 rocket. laughing

              But when we deploy our new groupings, then reusable systems will be needed to quickly maintain them in good shape, which we are now actively working on. Including the replacement of Soyuz-2. Already on LNG.
              1. +1
                15 October 2021 20: 02
                "We have already figured out - to produce the first and second stages of the Soyuz-2, for the number of spacecraft that we launch cheaper than the cost of a used first stage of the F9 rocket. Laughing" ///
                ----
                Salaries in the United States and Russia are different. laughing
                And the production of "Korolev carrots", I suppose, has been fine-tuned to the smallest detail for 60 years? smile
                1. +2
                  15 October 2021 23: 37
                  Quote: voyaka uh
                  Salaries in the United States and Russia are different. laughing


                  So is the grocery basket.

                  Quote: voyaka uh
                  And the production of "Korolev carrots", I suppose, has been fine-tuned to the smallest detail for 60 years? smile


                  Of course, the very last cat in the shop knows how they are assembled. laughing

                  Therefore, the designers should still try to reduce the cost of the first stage of the Amur-LNG, which replaces the Soyuz-2.
            2. 0
              17 October 2021 09: 17
              five, forgive 11 launches of the same stage, instead of 11 new products - it's not your cat who shit in a slipper .. You count the money ..


              Uh-huh, As with the shuttle, which was supposed to reduce the cost of delivering payloads to orbit, but for some reason did not.
              Could you give exact data how much did the "11-time" step (together with the cost of 11 launches) cost and how much did our 11 one-time steps cost?
              Which is cheaper and how much?
              Just wondering.
  2. +3
    15 October 2021 10: 09
    "Who controls space - controls the Earth"
    - well, actually it is ...
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. +3
    15 October 2021 10: 12
    It's funny to read all this nonsense, as if the mattress is so holy and carries only flowers into orbit and always cleans up the garbage after itself. two-faced
    1. -1
      15 October 2021 10: 39
      Quote: 501Legion
      The mattress is so sacred and carries only flowers into orbit and always removes debris after itself. two-faced

      They didn't have enough dark ones to clean up debris in space. And vaaasche, their Chinese garbage prevents important American ships from sailing freely in space! There is not enough space !!! )))
    2. +1
      15 October 2021 10: 47
      Well, the mattress thinks that it is possible for Jupiter, but it is impossible for a bull.
  5. +4
    15 October 2021 10: 28
    Who was the first to mention the war in space ?!
    "Exceptional Analysts", look back at your SDI program. The US Strategic Defense Initiative - Star Wars, announced by US President Reagan in 1983.
    Your constant strategy in information warfare is "to see a speck in the enemy's eye, and not to notice the beam in yours"
    1. +2
      15 October 2021 10: 49
      If we touch on the military topic, then unexpectedly unpleasant facts may come to light.
      Such, for example, that the preliminary design of the RKK OPS "Almaz" was developed and approved by OKB-52 back in 1967. If anyone has forgotten, the Almaz OPS was created as a purely military orbital station.
      On April 3, 1973, OPS-1 Almaz was launched.
      Skylab OS was launched only on May 14 of the same year.
      So the question of priorities is pretty sensitive.
      1. 0
        15 October 2021 11: 06
        Cosm22. ...So the question of priorities is pretty sensitive.

        In my comment, there is not a word about "priorities". It's about lies
        American "analysts" who blame China without looking back.
        As for the "priority", in the USSR the first destruction of a satellite target occurred on November 1, 1968, the role of the "kamikaze" interceptor was performed by the "Kosmos-252" apparatus. Today such devices are called "satellite inspector". As for the Reagan SDI, as it turned out later, it was a "fake" program to drag the USSR into a new round of the "arms race." hi
        1. +3
          15 October 2021 11: 18
          Those. in the phrase "who is the first" the concept of "priority" as a semantic element of the context is not even implied?
          Further. It was using "looking back" that I mentioned the story with "Diamonds". You can look back even further and remember that the first artificial Earth satellite was launched not only with the aim of picking up from space. And also in order to demonstrate that from now on the nuclear warhead of the carrier can be delivered to any point.
          Regarding the fact that the Union fell for a fake about "Star Wars" - who is his doctor?
          1. -2
            15 October 2021 12: 19
            Cosm22 .....Those. in the phrase "who is the first" the concept of "priority" as a semantic element of the context is not even implied?

            In the "discussion" with you, a soldier's anecdote involuntarily comes to mind:

            Ensign - new radio stations have been installed on these tanks.
            The cadet is a comrade warrant officer, and the radio stations are on lamps, or
            on transistors?
            Ensign - for the dull, I repeat - on the tanks! crying hi
      2. 0
        17 October 2021 09: 20
        If we touch on the military topic, then unexpectedly unpleasant facts may come to light.
        Such, for example, that the preliminary design of the RKK OPS "Almaz" was developed and approved by OKB-52 back in 1967.


        Unpleasant for you, not for normal citizens.
        The Yankees began to develop programs for the military use of space even before Gagarin's flight.
        That some projects (like "Dinosaur", for example) were covered with a basin is another question.
  6. +8
    15 October 2021 10: 29
    About the Chinese space, today the second mission is flying to the Chinese station, this time with the girl for the second time (the Chinese still prefer to use the first squad with experience). For 3 months.


    Chinese woman astronaut will give a lesson to students while in orbit
    Jiuquan, / Xinhua / - Chinese woman astronaut Wang Yaping, crew member of the Shenzhou 13 spacecraft, will teach a lesson to students while in orbit, the Office of the China Manned Space Program (CMSA) said on Thursday.
    This will be Wang Yaping's second lecture from space, said Lin Xiqiang, deputy chief of CMSA, at a press conference on the launch of the Shenzhou 13 spacecraft, which is scheduled for October 16.
    Wang Yaping became China's first "Orbital Teacher" after delivering her lecture live during the flight of the Shenzhou 10 spacecraft in June 2013. The lecture was televised and attracted more than 60 million students in schools in China.

    In providing Yunwang7, who escaped ahead of time to ensure uninterrupted communication.
    1. +1
      15 October 2021 10: 42
      today the second mission is flying to the Chinese station, this time with the girl for the second time (the Chinese still prefer to use the first squad with experience). For 3 months.

      Well, success for them there, and a safe return!
      Russian teachers need to take note of how to conduct online teaching! )))
  7. +2
    15 October 2021 10: 37
    They see space as a future war zone and want to establish their strategic advantage there. And they are all Chinese "militarists". Such conclusions were made in a fresh report of the US Air Force analysts, which were diligently retold by the journalists of The Washington Times.

    "Pot calls the kettle black..."
  8. +2
    15 October 2021 10: 37
    Satellites of all kinds of intelligence are unlikely to be preserved in case of war. Since they have no protection from a cloud of kinetic projectiles now, and after the destruction of the most "populated" orbits, the remaining debris will make them unusable depending on the altitude of the orbit from days to decades.
  9. 0
    15 October 2021 12: 28
    We are waiting for shock stations in orbit)
  10. +1
    15 October 2021 12: 29
    While the Americans are throwing information at China, our small spacecraft weighing only 3.5 kg, designed with the participation of schoolchildren from the Sochi Sirius and assembled by assemblers in the private company Sputniks, continue to carry out remote sensing of the Earth with domestic experimental cameras.

    Cyprus


    Corsica


    Suez Canal


    At the beginning of next year, the group will be replenished with new small spacecraft, including those able to actively maneuver ...
    1. +1
      15 October 2021 13: 07
      that is, there has been more space debris in orbit? How long does such a satellite "live" and how long will it (already dead) fly over the planet?
      1. +2
        15 October 2021 13: 29
        Quote: Dikson
        that is, there has been more space debris in orbit? How long does such a satellite "live" and how long will it (already dead) fly over the planet?


        Garbage? laughing Previous Sirius-sats lived in space in low orbit, transmitting data on space weather, for two and a half years each and quietly left their orbit, as they were not maneuvering. This allowed us to carry out unique measurements of particle fluxes at extremely low altitudes up to 180 km.

        New devices continue this program, the grouping is growing.

        A snapshot of the Suez Canal from the end of August from the Zorky spacecraft in panchromatic mode




"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"